Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Exploring the Prognostic Value of Novel Markers in Adults With a Systemic Right Ventricle

Laurie W. Geenen, Roderick W. J. van Grootel, Korhan Akman and 7 more

Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease · 2019

doi:10.1161/jaha.119.013745 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Background Adults with a systemic right ventricle (sRV) have a high risk of cardiac complications. This study aimed to identify prognostic markers in adults with sRV based on clinical evaluation, echocardiography, and blood biomarkers. Methods and Results In this prospective cohort study, consecutive clinically stable adults with sRV caused by Mustard‐ or congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries were included (2011–2013). Eighty‐six patients were included (age 37±9 years, 65% male, 83% New York Heart Association functional class I, 76% Mustard transposition of the great arteries, 24% congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries). Venous blood sampling was performed including N‐terminal pro B‐type natriuretic peptide, high‐sensitive‐troponin‐T, high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein, growth differentiation factor‐15, galectin‐3, red cell distribution width, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and hemoglobin. Besides conventional echocardiographic measurements, longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain were assessed using strain analysis. During a median follow‐up of 5.9 (interquartile range 5.3–6.3) years, 19 (22%) patients died or had heart failure (primary end point) and 29 (34%) patients died or had arrhythmia (secondary end point). Univariable Cox regression analysis was performed using dichotomous or standardized continuous variables. New York Heart Association functional class >I, systolic blood pressure, and most blood biomarkers were associated with the primary and secondary end point (galectin‐3 not for primary, N‐terminal pro B‐type natriuretic peptide and high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein not for secondary end point). Growth differentiation factor‐15 showed the strongest association with both end points (hazard ratios; 2.44 [95% CI 1.67–3.57, P<0.001], 2.00 [95% CI 1.46–2.73, P<0.001], respectively). End‐diastolic basal dimension of the subpulmonary ventricle was associated with both end points (hazard ratio: 1.95 [95% CI 1.34–2.85], P<0.001, 1.70 [95% CI 1.21–2.38, P=0.002], respectively). Concerning strain analysis, only sRV septal strain was associated with the secondary end point (hazard ratio 0.58 [95% CI 0.39–0.86], P=0.006). Conclusions Clinical, conventional echocardiographic, and blood measurements are important markers for risk stratification in adults with a sRV. The value of novel echocardiographic strain analysis seems limited.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.