Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 19, 2026.

Therapeutic Cardiac‐Targeted Delivery of miR‐1 Reverses Pressure Overload–Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy and Attenuates Pathological Remodeling

Ioannis Karakikes, Antoine H. Chaanine, Soojeong Kang and 5 more

Journal of the American Heart Association · 2013

doi:10.1161/jaha.113.000078

Abstract

Background Micro RNA s (mi RNA s) play a key role in the development of heart failure, and recent studies have shown that the muscle‐specific miR‐1 is a key regulator of cardiac hypertrophy. We tested the hypothesis that chronic restoration of miR‐1 gene expression in vivo will regress hypertrophy and protect against adverse cardiac remodeling induced by pressure overload. Methods and Results Cardiac hypertrophy was induced by left ventricular pressure overload in male S prague‐ D awley rats subjected to ascending aortic stenosis. When the hypertrophy was established at 2 weeks after surgery, the animals were randomized to receive either an adeno‐associated virus expressing miR‐1 ( AAV 9. miR‐1 ) or green fluorescent protein ( GFP ) as control ( AAV 9. GFP ) via a single‐bolus tail‐vein injection. Administration of miR‐1 regressed cardiac hypertrophy (left ventricular posterior wall thickness,; 2.32±0.08 versus 2.75±0.07 mm, P <0.001) and (left ventricular septum wall thickness, 2.23±0.06 versus 2.54±0.10 mm, P <0.05) and halted the disease progression compared with control‐treated animals, as assessed by echocardiography (fractional shortening, 37.60±5.01% versus 70.68±2.93%, P <0.05) and hemodynamic analyses (end‐systolic pressure volume relationship/effective arterial elastance, 1.87±0.46 versus 0.96±0.38, P <0.05) after 7 weeks of treatment. Additionally, miR‐1 replacement therapy lead to a marked reduction of myocardial fibrosis, an improvement in calcium handling, inhibition of apoptosis, and inactivation of the mitogen‐activated protein kinase signaling pathways, suggesting a favorable effect on preventing the maladaptive ventricular remodeling. We also identified and validated a novel bona fide target of miR‐1 , Fibullin‐2 ( Fbln2 ), a secreted protein implicated in extracellular matrix remodeling. Conclusions Taken together, our findings suggest that restoration of miR‐1 gene expression is a potential novel therapeutic strategy to reverse pressure‐induced cardiac hypertrophy and prevent maladaptive cardiac remodeling.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 19, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Cardiac hypertrophy is an adaptive growth response of the heart in response to increased stress such as aortic stenosis. Persistent stress activates diverse signal transduction pathways leading to pathological remodeling of the heart and consequently the development of heart failure, a syndrome characterized by dilatation of the left ventricle and contractile dysfunction.– Cardiac hypertrophy is a major risk factor for the development of heart failure, and its therapeutic reversal is associated with improved mortality.– Recent studies have indicated a key role of microRNAs (miRNAs) in biological processes including differentiation, apoptosis, proliferation, and development,– and their dysregulation has been linked to several human diseases, including cardiovascular disease.– miRNAs are small noncoding RNA molecules that act as post‐transcriptional repressors of target genes by antisense binding to 3′‐untranslated regions (3′‐UTRs) of target mRNAs, resulting in mRNA degradation and/or translational repression. Their altered expression has been linked to heart disease, and several miRNAs are aberrantly expressed in the diseased heart, suggesting that altered miRNA gene expression may be a common feature of human cardiovascular disease.– Previous studies have shown that the muscle‐specific miR‐1 is a key regulator of cardiac hypertrophy, and its expression is diminished in both animal models and human heart disease.–,– Because individual miRNAs often regulate the expression of multiple gene targets, modulating the expression of a single miRNA can, in principle, influence multiple gene networks and thereby modify complex disease phenotypes. The network of miR‐1 target genes and their mechanism of action in the heart have led to the suggestion that miR‐1 gene replacement may provide a potential source of novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of cardiovascular abnormalities in humans.

In this study, we addressed a clinically relevant question of whether the chronic restoration of miR‐1 expression in vivo by adeno‐associated virus (AAV)‐mediated gene transfer could be protective against the maladaptive cardiac remodeling induced by pressure overload. We present evidence that the restoration of miR‐1 gene expression induces the regression of the pathological left ventricular (LV) pressure‐overload–induced hypertrophy and prevents the deterioration of cardiac function despite severe persistence of elevated LV systolic pressure. The reversal of the hypertrophic phenotype was also evident at the cellular and molecular levels and was paralleled by the attenuation of myocardial fibrosis and the inhibition of apoptosis. In addition, we identified a novel direct target gene of miR‐1, Fbln2, which, in part, may contribute to the regression of the hypertrophic phenotype. Our data reveal a novel mechanism of miR‐1–induced functional improvements that are associated with the modulation of hypertrophic signaling pathways, extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, and calcium homeostasis. These findings provide a proof‐of‐concept support for systemic delivery of antihypertrophic miRNAs using cardiotropic AAV vectors, which represent a novel strategy to modulate cardiac miRNA gene expression and potentially an attractive approach for heart failure therapy.

Methods

Animals were handled as approved by the Mount Sinai Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in accordance with the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Institutes of Health.

Hypertrophy Model

Male Sprague‐Dawley rats (180 to 200 g) underwent ascending aortic banding (AAB) after induction of anesthesia with intraperitoneal ketamine (up to 85 mg/kg) and xylazine (up to 10 mg/kg), as described previously. Additional animals underwent a left thoracotomy without aortic banding to serve as age‐matched controls (sham).

Recombinant AAV9.miR‐1 Construct

A genomic fragment containing the miR‐1 precursor was polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified from the rat miR‐1 precursor sequence, cloned into self‐complementary AAV genome vector, and pseudotyped into rAAV9 capsids (AAV9.miR‐1). The green fluorescent protein (GFP)‐expressing vector (AAV9.GFP) was used as a control. Recombinant AAV‐9 viruses were produced as previously described.

Viral Delivery Protocol

Two weeks after AAB, the rats with evident LV hypertrophy, as assessed by echocardiography, were randomly chosen to receive a single‐bolus tail‐vein injection of either AAV9.miR‐1 (n=6) or AAV9.GFP (n=9) at 5×1011 vg (viral genomes) per animal. Echocardiographic measurements were performed at baseline and 2 and 9 weeks post AAB. Invasive hemodynamics measurements were also obtained at 9 weeks post AAB, and the animals were killed (protocol summarized in Figure 1A).

Echocardiographic Analysis

Transthoracic echocardiography was performed using a Vivid 7 (GE Healthcare) echocardiography apparatus with a 14‐MHz probe (i13L probe; General Electric). Animals were sedated with ketamine (up to 80 mg/kg) injected intraperitoneally. Long‐axis parasternal views and short‐axis parasternal 2‐dimensional (2D) views, at the mid‐papillary level, of the left ventricle were obtained to calculate the LV end‐diastolic (LVEDV) and end‐systolic (LVESV) volumes as well as the ejection fraction of the left ventricle. Volumes were calculated by using the formulae of the area‐length method (V=5/6×A×L, where V is the volume in mL, A is the cross‐sectional area of the LV cavity in cm2, obtained from the mid‐papillary short parasternal image in diastole and in systole, and L is the length of the LV cavity in cm, measured from the long‐axis parasternal image as the distance from the endocardial LV apex to the mitral‐aortic junction in diastole and in systole). M‐mode images were obtained by 2‐dimensional guidance from the parasternal short‐axis view for the measurements of LV wall thickness of the septum (cm) and of the posterior wall (cm), LV end‐diastolic diameter (cm), and LV end‐systolic diameter (cm), as well as to calculate the LV fractional shortening (FS, %).

Hemodynamics Analysis

At end point, LV pressure–volume loops (P‐V) measurements were obtained as previously described. Briefly, rats were anesthetized with inhaled isoflurane (5% v/v) for induction and subsequently intubated and mechanically ventilated as noted in the surgery section. Isoflurane was lowered (2% to 3% v/v) for surgical incision. The chest was opened through a median sternotomy, and a 1.9F rat P‐V catheter (Scisense) was inserted into the LV apex through an apical stab performed with a 25‐gauge needle. The animals were kept sedated with 0.75% to 1% isoflurane maintaining a stable heart rate (≈350 beats/min). Hemodynamic recordings were performed after 5 minutes of stable heart rate. The intrathoracic inferior vena cava was transiently occluded to decrease venous return during the recording to obtain load‐independent P‐V relationships. Linear fits were obtained for end‐systolic P‐V relationships (ESPVR) and end‐diastolic P‐V relationships (EDPVR). At the end of the experiment, 30% NaCl 50 μL was slowly injected into the external jugular vein for ventricular parallel conductance measurement as previously described.– Blood resistivity was measured using a special probe (Scisense). Volume measurements were initially obtained as blood conductance and calibrated using Baan equation 3, and pressure sensors were calibrated according to manufacturer's instructions (Scisense).

Quantification of Mature miRNAs

Total RNA was isolated with use of an mirVana miRNA Isolation Kit (Ambion) followed by a DNase treatment to eliminate contaminating genomic DNA (Invitrogen). Mature miR‐1 expression was quantified by real‐time quantitative PCR (qPCR) using the Taqman MicroRNA Assays according to the manufacturer's instructions (Applied Biosystems). Gene expression levels were normalized to U6 rRNA endogenous control, and fold changes were calculated using the ΔΔCt method.

qRT‐PCR Gene Expression Analysis

Relative gene expression was determined using 2‐step qRT‐PCR. Quantitative PCRs were performed with Power SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) on an ABI Prism 7500 Real Time PCR System. Fold changes were calculated using the ΔΔCt method with normalization to 18S rRNA housekeeping gene.

Western Blotting Analysis

Protein expression was evaluated in LV lysates by Western blot analysis according to standard procedures with antibodies against phospholamban (Pln) (Badrilla, UK), Serca2a (custom made in our laboratory), extracellular signal‐regulated protein kinase (ERK1/2), phospho‐ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204), phospho‐p38 (Thr180/Tyr182), p38, phospho–c‐jun NH2‐terminal kinase (JNK) (Thr183/Tyr185), JNK, Bcl‐2, and Bax (Cell Signaling Technology), Fbln2 (Genetex), Ncx1 (Abcam), and Gapdh (Sigma‐Aldrich). The signals were detected with ECL‐Plus chemiluminescence detection kit (Pierce) or with the ODYSSEY Infrared Imaging System (Li‐CoR).

Histological Assessment of Fibrosis

LV cryosections (≈10 μm) were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and stained with picrosirius solution (0.1% Sirius Red in picric acid; Sigma‐Aldrich). Images were acquired at ×20 magnification under circular polarized illumination using an Olympus BX50 microscope. The relative amount of collagen area to total tissue area was measured in each image by using a color threshold technique with National Institutes of Health ImageJ software.

Histological Assessment of Myocyte Cross‐sectional Area

Heart LV cryosections (10 μm) cut at the papillary muscle level were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and incubated with Texas Red‐X conjugate of wheat germ agglutinin (5 μg/mL; Invitrogen) for 45 minutes at room temperature. The cross‐sectional area of approximately 100 myocytes with circular shape of the cell membrane was measured in the LV free walls of each animal using ImageJ software.

Dual Luciferase Assays

The 3′‐UTR of Fbln2 and Ncx1 containing the predicted miR‐1 target sequences were amplified by PCR and cloned into the multiple cloning region located downstream of the Renilla translational stop codon of the psiCHECK‐2 dual luciferase vector (Promega). Using the DharmaFECT Duo transfection reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 50 ng of psiCHECK–3′‐UTR constructs and 10 pmol of pre–miR‐1 miRNA precursors or 10 pmol of pre‐miR negative control (Life Technologies) were cotransfected in HEK293FT (Invitrogen) cells. Forty‐eight hours after transfection, the normalized Renilla luciferase activity (Renilla luciferase/firefly) was measured using the Dual‐Glo Luciferase Assay System according to the manufacturer's instructions (Promega).

Isolation and Culture of Rat Ventricular Myocytes

Neonatal rat ventricular myocytes were isolated by enzymatic dissociation of cardiac ventricle from 1‐ to 2‐day‐old Sprague‐Dawley pups using the neonatal cardiomyocyte isolation system according to the manufacturer's instructions (Worthington). Adult rat ventricular myocytes were isolated from male Sprague‐Dawley rats (280 to 300 g) using a modified Langendorff perfusion system as previously described.

Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase–Mediated dUTP Nick End Labeling Assay

The assessment of apoptosis was performed by the indirect terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated dUTP nick end labeling assay (TUNEL) method, using an antidigoxigenin antibody with a rhodamine fluorochrome with the Apoptag Red in Situ Apoptosis Detection kit (Millipore) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Human Heart Specimens

Human heart tissue specimens were obtained from the National Disease Research Interchange through the Human Tissues and Organs for Research program.

Statistical Analysis

The underlying assumption of normal distribution was investigated by performing a Kolmogorov–Smirnoff normality test and normal probability plot test. When the distribution was found to be normal, statistical significance between 2 groups was examined by t test and by 1‐way ANOVA for multigroup comparisons. When the ANOVA results were significant, the differences among individual groups were determined with the Bonferroni post hoc test. The echocardiography data were analyzed with repeated measures ANOVA test. The luciferase reporter assay data were analyzed with 2‐factor ANOVA test. P<0.05 was considered significant.

Systemic Administration of AAV9.miR‐1 Restores miR‐1 Gene Expression In Vivo

A genomic fragment containing the miR‐1 precursor was PCR amplified from the rat miR‐1 precursor sequence and cloned into the self‐complementary AAV genome vector under the control of cytomegalovirus promoter (Figure 1B). The expression cassette was comprised of the miR‐1 stem loop sequence flanked by its native intron sequence, which preserves the putative hairpin structure and proper endogenous processing. The expression of mature miR‐1 was validated in vitro in neonatal (Figure 1C) and adult cardiac myocytes (Figure 1D) by qRT‐PCR with stem‐loop primers (Figure 1E). AAV9‐mediated miR‐1 gene transfer in vivo in the setting of pressure‐overload hypertrophy (Figure 1A) restored the expression of the mature miR‐1 in the hypertrophic hearts (Figure 1F).

miR‐1 Gene Transfer Reverses Hypertrophy and Prevents Functional Deterioration

LV function and dimensions were measured by serial echocardiography at baseline and 2 weeks and 9 weeks post‐AAB (Figure 2A). After 2 weeks, the AAB hearts exhibited concentric hypertrophy characterized by marked increase in LV thickness (LV wall thickness of the septum and of the posterior wall) and a significant increase in fractional shortening (FS) compared with sham‐operated animals (Table 1). Seven weeks after gene transfer, the LV wall thickness of the AAV9.miR‐1 group was significantly decreased compared with the AAV9.GFP group (LV wall thickness of the posterior wall: 2.32±0.08 versus 2.75±0.07 mm, P<0.001; LV wall thickness of the septum: 2.23±0.06 versus 2.54±0.10 mm, P<0.05) (Figure 2B and Table 1). In addition, the AAV9.GFP group displayed substantial increase in LV chamber end‐systolic (LVEDs) and end‐diastolic (LVEDd) dimensions compared with the sham group, indicating ventricular dilatation, which has been significantly attenuated by AAV9.miR‐1 gene transfer (Table 1). The AAV9.GFP group exhibited significantly reduced contractility compared with the AAV9.miR‐1–treated animals, as assessed by FS (37.60±5.01% versus 70.68±2.93%, P<0.05) (Figure 2C) and the ejection fraction (53.86±7.12% versus 87.99±1.43%, P<0.05) (Table 1).

Additionally, we further examined the effects of miR‐1 restoration on cardiac function in vivo by using the PV‐loop analysis. Catheterization and hemodynamic analysis after 7 weeks of gene transfer showed a significant increase in LV chamber dimensions in the AAV9.GFP– compared with the AAV9.miR‐1–treated hearts (EDV: 1316.30±79.15 μL versus 683.37±79.14 μL, P<0.05; ESV: 869.40±150 μL versus 312.86±83.85 μL, P<0.05) (Table 2), which is in agreement with the echocardiographic measurements. The analysis of LV function also revealed a significant improvement in the AAV9.miR‐1 systolic parameters compared with the AAV9.GFP group as measured by the end‐systolic PV relation normalized to the effective arterial elastance (Ea) (1.87±0.46 versus 0.96±0.38, P<0.05) (Figure 2D). Moreover, diastolic parameters were also normalized in the AAV9.miR‐1 group as evidenced by the decrease in the time constant of LV pressure decay during the isovolumic relaxation phase tau (7.94±0.7 versus 9.69±1.42, P<0.05) (Figure 2E). Taken together, these data suggest that miR‐1 gene transfer preserved cardiac function and prevented the transition to heart failure induced by pressure overload.

Postmortem analysis revealed that the heart weight–to–body weight ratio was significantly lower in AAV9.miR‐1– compared with AAV9.GFP–treated hearts (3.72±0.10 versus 5.9±0.69 mg/g, P=0.02) (Figure 3A). We confirmed these observations at the cellular level by evaluating the cross‐sectional area of cardiac myocytes in histological sections of LV tissues at 7 weeks post gene transfer (Figure 3B). We observed that cardiac myocytes from AAV9.GFP were significantly larger than those from the sham‐operated hearts (689.33±14.53 versus 379.68±9.10 μm2, P<0.05). In contrast, AAV9.miR‐1 treatment significantly reduced the cardiac myocyte cross‐sectional area to levels similar to those of the sham‐operated hearts (400.92±12.62 versus 379.68±9.10 μm2, P<0.05) (Figure 3B).

miR‐1 Modulates the Expression of Molecular Markers of Cardiac Hypertrophy

Next we investigated the effect of miR‐1 treatment on molecular abnormalities associated with pathological hypertrophy. We tested the hypothesis that the reversal of the pathological remodeling observed in the AAV9.miR‐1 group in vivo is paralleled by a reversal in the reinduction of the maladaptive fetal cardiac gene program. We assessed the expression of the hypertrophic fetal genes, atrial natriuretic factor (Anf), skeletal muscle α‐actin (Acta1), cardiac alpha‐actinin (Actc1), as well as the contractile protein isoforms α‐ and β‐myosin heavy chain (Myh6 and Myh7, respectively), at 7 weeks post gene transfer. Pressure‐overload–induced hypertrophy in the AAV9.GFP–treated group was associated with reinduction of the “fetal gene program” characterized by a significant increase in the mRNA expression of Anf (21‐fold), Myh7 (4.3‐fold), and Acta1 (1.8‐fold) and a decrease in Myh6 (21.6‐fold) and Actc1 (1.7‐fold) compared with sham‐operated animals (Figure 3C). In contrast, we observed a reversal of the MHC shift that was characterized by the significant increase in the “adult” Myh6 (17.84‐fold) and decrease in the “fetal” Myh7 (1.55‐fold) as well as the significant decrease in Anf expression (4.37‐fold) and the significant increase of Actc1 (1.8‐fold) in miR‐1‐treated hearts compared with AAV9.GFP–treated hearts (Figure 3C).

miR‐1 Regulates the Expression and Activity of Key Calcium Homeostasis Genes

Ca2+ uptake into the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) is mediated by the cardiac SR Ca2+‐ATPase (Serca2a) and regulated by Pln. Serca2a is an important regulator of intracellular Ca2+ signaling in the heart, and its decreased expression and activity are implicated in heart failure. We performed immunoblotting analyses to assess the protein levels of Serca2a and Pln and the phosphorylation state of Pln (Figure 4A). We observed a significant decrease in Serca2a protein expression levels (50%) but no change in Pln expression in ventricular tissue from AAV9.GFP compared with sham‐operated animals (Figure 4B). Phosphorylation of Pln at Ser16 was also decreased (Figure 4B). In contrast, AAV9.miR‐1 significantly upregulated Serca2a protein levels and restored the Serca2a/Pln ratio to sham levels compared with AAV9.GFP; it also increased Pln phosphorylation at Ser16 and the phosphoPln/Pln ratio (Figure 4B). Taken together, the data suggest that the changes in Serca2a content and activity (increased Pln phosphorylation and Serca2a/Pln ratio) are indicative of enhanced SR Ca2+ cycling, which correlates with the improvement in cardiac contractility observed following miR‐1 gene transfer.

Activity of the Mitogen‐Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Pathways Is Altered by miR‐1

It is well established that pressure‐overload–induced biomechanical stresses stimulate various signaling pathways essential for induction of the hypertrophic response. These signaling pathways include the mitogen‐activated protein kinase superfamily with its 3 terminal effector kinase subfamilies: ERK1/2, JNK, and p38. We sought to determine whether miR‐1 restoration had an effect on these pathways. The activity of both ERK1/2 and p38 kinase proteins were significantly increased in AAV9.GFP hearts compared with sham‐operated animals, as assessed by their phosphorylation levels. In contrast, the p38 and the ERK1/2 kinase activation was significantly decreased in AAV9.miR‐1–compared with AAV9.GFP treated animals. We did not observe significant changes in JNK or phospho‐JNK levels among the groups (Figure 5).

miR‐1 Inhibits Cardiac Fibrosis and Apoptosis

Since cardiac fibrosis and apoptosis are prominent features in the transition from compensatory hypertrophy to heart failure, we sought to examine the potential involvement of miR‐1 restoration in the regulation of cardiac ECM remodeling and apoptosis. Fibrosis is a pathological feature of cardiac adaptation to stress, where the proliferation of fibroblasts and increased deposition of ECM components results in myocardial stiffness and diastolic dysfunction, and recently it has been demonstrated that miRNAs play a central role in the control of cardiac fibrosis and pathological LV remodeling.– Histological examination of LV sections by sirius‐red staining and subsequent quantification of the fibrotic area revealed that AAB induced a profound increase in interstitial fibrosis in the AAV9.GFP–treated hearts compared with sham‐operated hearts. In contrast, AAV9.miR‐1 treatment significantly decreased fibrosis (Figure 6A and 6B). In addition, we observed a significant reduction in mRNA expression of the profibrotic genes, the transforming growth factor beta‐1 (Tgfb1), and the connective tissue growth factor (Ctgf), in the AAV9.miR‐1– compared with AAV9.GFP–treated hearts (Figure 6C and 6D, respectively).

In addition, in response to long‐term pressure overload, cardiomyocyte apoptosis may further contribute to the transition from LV hypertrophy to heart failure. By Western blot analysis, we quantified the protein expression of the antiapoptotic gene, Bcl‐2, and the proapoptotic gene, Bax, which are involved in the apoptotic pathway (Figure 7A). Results showed that there was a significant increase in Bcl‐2 and a decrease in Bax expression in AAV9.miR‐1– compared with AAV9.GFP–treated hearts. Consequently, the Bcl‐2/Bax ratio, an important marker of myocardial cell survival probability, was significantly increased in the AAV9.miR‐1– compared with AAV9.GFP–treated hearts (Figure 7B). These findings were further corroborated in situ apoptosis detection by TUNEL assay, which demonstrated a marked decrease in DNA fragmentation of nuclei detected in AAV9.miR‐1– compared with AAV9.GFP–treated hearts (Figure 7C through 7D).

Identification of Fbln2 as a Direct Target of miR‐1

Previous studies have identified several direct targets of miR‐1, including calmodulin (Calm), insulin growth factor 1 (Igf1), Ncx1, and twinfilin (Twf1), which play a significant role in hypertrophy and heart failure. To gain additional insights into the molecular function of the miR‐1 in the setting of pressure‐overload–induced cardiac hypertrophy, we used computational and experimental approaches for the identification of novel, biologically relevant direct target genes. Using a target prediction algorithm, we identified Fbln2 as putative target gene of miR‐1. The mRNA sequence of Fbln2 is predicted to contain a conserved “seed” sequence complementary to miR‐1 in the 3′‐UTR (Figure 8A). Fbln2 is an extracellular matrix protein that is highly expressed in the developing heart and plays an important role during embryonic development and cardiac remodeling.

We performed a luciferase‐based expression assays in vitro to verify that Fbln2 is a bona fide miR‐1 target. A short (≈250 bp) fragment from the 3′‐UTR of Fbln2 was cloned downstream of the stop codon of the Renilla luciferase in a dual‐luciferase reporter vector. In parallel, a fragment of the Ncx1 3′‐UTRs predicted to contain a conserved “seed” sequence complementary to miR‐1 was also cloned, serving a positive control for the luciferase assay. Each construct was cotransfected in HEK293 cells with synthetic miR‐1 mimics (pre–miR‐1) or control mimics (control pre‐miR). In the presence of miR‐1, we observed a significant decrease in luciferase activity of Fbln2 and Ncx1 constructs (Figure 8B). In contrast, cotransfection of a control miRNA did not result in a decrease in luciferase activity (Figure 8B). In addition, cotransfection of pre‐miR‐1 or control pre‐miR mimics with constructs containing the deleted 3′‐UTR sequences had no significant effect on the luciferase activity (Figure 8B).

In addition, we evaluated whether Fbln2 and Ncx1 expression was regulated by miR‐1 in vivo in the setting of pressure‐overload–induced hypertrophy. Western blot analysis demonstrated that at the protein level, the expression of both Fbln2 and Ncx1 was significantly decreased in the LV tissue of the AAV9.miR‐1– compared with AAV9.GFP–treated animals (Figure 8C through 8E). In addition to translational repression, miRNAs can lead to mRNA degradation of their targets.– We observed a significant decrease in the mRNA expression levels of Fbln2 and Ncx1 in the AAV9.miR1 animals compared with AAV9.GFP‐treated, as assessed by qRT‐PCR (Figure 8F). Furthermore, we verified that the expression of Igf1, Twf1, and Calm2 was decreased in AAV9.miR‐1– compared with AAV.9.GFP–treated animals (Figure 8G through 8I). Taken together, these results suggest that the restoration of miR‐1 levels in the setting of pressure‐overload–induced hypertrophy in vivo was paralleled by the modulation of a novel direct target gene, Fbln2, as well as the previously identified targets, Ncx1, Igf1, Twf1, and Calm2.

Discussion

Recent studies have shown that changes in miRNA expression play an important role in diverse aspects of cardiovascular pathophysiology, and the modulation of miRNA activity could provide potential new therapeutic targets for cardiovascular diseases., The ability of a single miRNA to control the expression of hundreds of proteins– suggests that modulation of individual miRNAs can influence multiple pathways simultaneously. Thus, therapeutically restoring the levels of individual antihypertrophic miRNAs in the hypertrophic heart, such as miR‐1, may therefore alleviate the deleterious effect of multiple pathways associated with pathological ventricular remodeling and heart failure.

In the current study, we assessed the long‐term effect of miR‐1 gene transfer in pressure‐overload–induced cardiac hypertrophy in vivo using a cardiotropic AAV9 vector that efficiently transduces cardiac tissue.,– We have presented a novel therapeutic strategy for the treatment of preexisting hypertrophy based on cardiac‐targeted delivery of miR‐1. The results described herein demonstrated that normalization of miR‐1 gene expression levels, which were downregulated in hypertrophy, reversed cardiac hypertrophy and attenuated pathological remodeling by simultaneously affecting multiple processes associated with pathological hypertrophy and heart failure. These findings are in agreement with other data showing an antihypertrophic effect of miR‐1.–, Further support to our findings is provided by recent studies that showed that miR‐1 overexpression attenuated agonist‐induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy both in vitro– and in vivo. However, in the latter study of Ikeda et al, only the short‐term expression of miR‐1 was examined in normal hearts using an adenovirus.

An important and novel aspect of our study is the uncovering of the pivotal role that miR‐1 plays in the attenuation of pressure‐overload–induced myocardial fibrosis, a key pathological feature of myocardial remodeling. Chronic pressure overload induces structural changes characterized by an increased accumulation of ECM proteins in the interstitium and perivascular regions of the myocardium, which leads to increased myocardial stiffness and alters the mechanics of the heart, predisposing individuals to ventricular dysfunction and arrhythmias.,– However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of a fibrogenic cardiac phenotype are not yet fully defined. Recently, it has been demonstrated that miRNAs such as miR‐133, miR‐30, miR‐29, and miR‐21 play a central role in the control of cardiac fibrosis and pathological LV remodeling by targeting multiple ECM‐related proteins associated with fibrosis.– In line with these findings, our data suggest that miR‐1 may also be implicated in the regulation of fibrosis by targeting Fbln‐2, a secreted ECM protein that plays an important role during adverse tissue remodeling under pathologicsl conditions.,– It has been recently described that the loss of Fbln2 inhibits ECM remodeling, attenuating the progression of cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction. Consistent with the postulated role of Fbln2 as a key pro fibrotic factor, we showed that the restoration of miR‐1 expression significantly decreased its expression as well as the marked reduction in collagen content and the downregulation of key profibrotic factors. The significance of this observation is strengthened by data from human samples showing that Fbln2 protein expression is significantly increased in hypertrophic hearts (Figure 8J), suggesting that it may be a key player in the development of heart failure in humans.

We have also uncovered another potential novel role of miR‐1 in intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis. To maintain Ca2+ homeostasis, Ca2+ entering cardiac cells during the process of excitation‐contraction coupling must be balanced by Ca2+ removal. During relaxation, Ca2+ is immediately transported into the SR via Serca2a and extruded by the sarcolemmal Ncx1. Heart failure is associated with reduced Serca2a expression– and increased Ncx1 expression,– which has been shown to contribute to both contractile dysfunction and arrhythmogenesis. Our data suggests a beneficial effect of miR‐1 gene transfer in Ca2+ homeostasis by directly modulating Ncx1 expression levels. In subsequent experiments in isolated hypertrophic cardiomyocytes, we demonstrated that miR‐1 overexpression modulates intracellular Ca2+ transients by altering the kinetics of Ca2+ removal from the cytoplasm during relaxation (Figure 9 and Table 3), which is in agreement with previous findings in transgenic animals overexpressing Ncx1. The enhanced Serca2a expression and activity observed in AAV9.miR‐1–treated hearts together with the reduction in Ncx1 expression results in a normalized Ncx1/Serca2a ratio, supporting a novel mechanism that miR‐1 fine‐tunes the Ca2+ homeostasis in cardiomyocytes, suggesting that miR‐1 plays a significant functional role in calcium metabolism in the heart.

It is possible that some of the beneficial effects observed in the miR‐1–treated hearts represents an indirect effect resulting from the reduced biomechanical overload secondary to the enhanced contractile function. In addition, we cannot exclude the possibility that miR‐1 could directly affect signaling pathways in other cell types such as cardiac fibroblasts, smooth muscle cells, or endothelial cells. Nevertheless, regardless of the precise mechanism, the global changes induced by the restoration of miR‐1 expression in the heart halted the progression of hypertrophy, ameliorating the pathological hypertrophic remodeling. Further investigation using the experimental platform used in this study has the potential to elucidate the specific mechanism(s) of miRNAs function in a disease setting. Future studies will provide a better understanding of the biological role of miR‐1 in the development of heart failure and will lead to the identification of novel molecular effectors and signaling pathways that target the progression of maladaptive cardiac hypertrophy.

In conclusion, AAV‐mediated normalization of miR‐1 expression ameliorates the hypertrophic phenotype and attenuates progressive deterioration of LV function through reversal of the cellular and molecular maladaptive remodeling associated with cardiac hypertrophy. Restoration of miR‐1 levels, therefore, may lead to a novel therapeutic strategy to reverse cardiac hypertrophy.

References 57

  1. 1.

    Hunter JJ Chien KR Signaling pathways for cardiac hypertrophy and failure. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341:1276-1283

    Not in our library10.1056/nejm199910213411706

  2. 2.

    Sadoshima J Izumo S The cellular and molecular response of cardiac myocytes to mechanical stress. Annu Rev Physiol. 1997; 59:551-571

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.physiol.59.1.551

  3. 3.

    Heineke J Molkentin JD Regulation of cardiac hypertrophy by intracellular signalling pathways. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006; 7:589-600

    Not in our library10.1038/nrm1983

  4. 4.

    Koren MJ Devereux RB Casale PN Savage DD Laragh JH Relation of left ventricular mass and geometry to morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated essential hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 1991; 114:345-352

    Not in our library10.7326/0003-4819-114-5-345

  5. 5.

    McKinsey TA Kass DA Small‐molecule therapies for cardiac hypertrophy: moving beneath the cell surface. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007; 6:617-635

    Not in our library10.1038/nrd2193

  6. 6.

    Bartel DP Chen CZ Micromanagers of gene expression: the potentially widespread influence of metazoan microRNAs. Nat Rev Genet. 2004; 5:396-400

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg1328

  7. 7.

    Kloosterman WP Plasterk RH The diverse functions of microRNAs in animal development and disease. Dev Cell. 2006; 11:441-450

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2006.09.009

  8. 8.

    Divakaran V Mann DL The emerging role of microRNAs in cardiac remodeling and heart failure. Circ Res. 2008; 103:1072-1083

    Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.108.183087

  9. 9.

    van Rooij E Olson EN MicroRNAs: powerful new regulators of heart disease and provocative therapeutic targets. J Clin Invest. 2007; 117:2369-2376

    Not in our library10.1172/jci33099

  10. 10.

    Lai EC Micro RNAs are complementary to 3′ UTR sequence motifs that mediate negative post‐transcriptional regulation. Nat Genet. 2002; 30:363-364

    Not in our library10.1038/ng865

  11. 11.

    Sayed D Hong C Chen IY Lypowy J Abdellatif M MicroRNAs play an essential role in the development of cardiac hypertrophy. Circ Res. 2007; 100:416-424

    Not in our library10.1161/01.res.0000257913.42552.23

  12. 12.

    Care A Catalucci D Felicetti F Bonci D Addario A Gallo P Bang ML Segnalini P Gu Y Dalton ND Elia L Latronico MV Hoydal M Autore C Russo MA Dorn GW II Ellingsen O Ruiz‐Lozano P Peterson KL Croce CM Peschle C Condorelli G MicroRNA‐133 controls cardiac hypertrophy. Nat Med. 2007; 13:613-618

    Not in our library10.1038/nm1582

  13. 13.

    Zhao Y Ransom JF Li A Vedantham V von Drehle M Muth AN Tsuchihashi T McManus MT Schwartz RJ Srivastava D Dysregulation of cardiogenesis, cardiac conduction, and cell cycle in mice lacking miRNA‐1‐2. Cell. 2007; 129:303-317

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.030

  14. 14.

    Cheng Y Ji R Yue J Yang J Liu X Chen H Dean DB Zhang C MicroRNAs are aberrantly expressed in hypertrophic heart: do they play a role in cardiac hypertrophy? Am J Pathol. 2007; 170:1831-1840

    Not in our library10.2353/ajpath.2007.061170

  15. 15.

    Thum T Galuppo P Wolf C Fiedler J Kneitz S van Laake LW Doevendans PA Mummery CL Borlak J Haverich A Gross C Engelhardt S Ertl G Bauersachs J MicroRNAs in the human heart: a clue to fetal gene reprogramming in heart failure. Circulation. 2007; 116:258-267

    Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.107.687947

  16. 16.

    van Rooij E Sutherland LB Liu N Williams AH McAnally J Gerard RD Richardson JA Olson EN A signature pattern of stress‐responsive microRNAs that can evoke cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006; 103:18255-18260

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0608791103

  17. 17.

    Ikeda S Kong SW Lu J Bisping E Zhang H Allen PD Golub TR Pieske B Pu WT Altered microRNA expression in human heart disease. Physiol Genomics. 2007; 31:367-373

    Not in our library10.1152/physiolgenomics.00144.2007

  18. 18.

    Ikeda S He A Kong SW Lu J Bejar R Bodyak N Lee KH Ma Q Kang PM Golub TR Pu WT MicroRNA‐1 negatively regulates expression of the hypertrophy‐associated calmodulin and Mef2a genes. Mol Cell Biol. 2009; 29:2193-2204

    Not in our library10.1128/mcb.01222-08

  19. 19.

    Elia L Contu R Quintavalle M Varrone F Chimenti C Russo MA Cimino V De Marinis L Frustaci A Catalucci D Condorelli G Reciprocal regulation of microRNA‐1 and insulin‐like growth factor‐1 signal transduction cascade in cardiac and skeletal muscle in physiological and pathological conditions. Circulation. 2009; 120:2377-2385

    Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.109.879429

  20. 20.

    Del Monte F Butler K Boecker W Gwathmey JK Hajjar RJ Novel technique of aortic banding followed by gene transfer during hypertrophy and heart failure. Physiol Genomics. 2002; 9:49-56

    Not in our library10.1152/physiolgenomics.00035.2001

  21. 21.

    Suckau L Fechner H Chemaly E Krohn S Hadri L Kockskamper J Westermann D Bisping E Ly H Wang X Kawase Y Chen J Liang L Sipo I Vetter R Weger S Kurreck J Erdmann V Tschope C Pieske B Lebeche D Schultheiss HP Hajjar RJ Poller WC Long‐term cardiac‐targeted RNA interference for the treatment of heart failure restores cardiac function and reduces pathological hypertrophy. Circulation. 2009; 119:1241-1252

    Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.108.783852

  22. 22.

    Pacher P Nagayama T Mukhopadhyay P Batkai S Kass DA Measurement of cardiac function using pressure‐volume conductance catheter technique in mice and rats. Nat Protoc. 2008; 3:1422-1434

    Not in our library10.1038/nprot.2008.138

  23. 23.

    Porterfield JE Kottam AT Raghavan K Escobedo D Jenkins JT Larson ER Trevino RJ Valvano JW Pearce JA Feldman MD Dynamic correction for parallel conductance, GP, and gain factor, alpha, in invasive murine left ventricular volume measurements. J Appl Physiol. 2009; 107:1693-1703

    Not in our library10.1152/japplphysiol.91322.2008

  24. 24.

    Terracciano CM MacLeod KT Measurements of Ca2+ entry and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ content during the cardiac cycle in guinea pig and rat ventricular myocytes. Biophys J. 1997; 72:1319-1326

    Not in our library10.1016/s0006-3495(97)78778-2

  25. 25.

    Chu G Kranias EG Functional interplay between dual site phospholambam phosphorylation: insights from genetically altered mouse models. Basic Res Cardiol. 2002; 97suppl 1:I43-I48

    Not in our library10.1007/s003950200028

  26. 26.

    Kawase Y Hajjar RJ The cardiac sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase: a potent target for cardiovascular diseases. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008; 5:554-565

    Not in our library10.1038/ncpcardio1301

  27. 27.

    Molkentin JD Dorn GW II Cytoplasmic signaling pathways that regulate cardiac hypertrophy. Annu Rev Physiol. 2001; 63:391-426

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.physiol.63.1.391

  28. 28.

    Creemers EE Pinto YM Molecular mechanisms that control interstitial fibrosis in the pressure‐overloaded heart. Cardiovasc Res. 2011; 89:265-272

    Not in our library10.1093/cvr/cvq308

  29. 29.

    Thum T Gross C Fiedler J Fischer T Kissler S Bussen M Galuppo P Just S Rottbauer W Frantz S Castoldi M Soutschek J Koteliansky V Rosenwald A Basson MA Licht JD Pena JT Rouhanifard SH Muckenthaler MU Tuschl T Martin GR Bauersachs J Engelhardt S MicroRNA‐21 contributes to myocardial disease by stimulating MAP kinase signalling in fibroblasts. Nature. 2008; 456:980-984

    Not in our library10.1038/nature07511

  30. 30.

    Duisters RF Tijsen AJ Schroen B Leenders JJ Lentink V van der Made I Herias V van Leeuwen RE Schellings MW Barenbrug P Maessen JG Heymans S Pinto YM Creemers EE miR‐133 and miR‐30 regulate connective tissue growth factor: implications for a role of microRNAs in myocardial matrix remodeling. Circ Res. 2009; 104:170-178

    Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.108.182535

  31. 31.

    van Rooij E Sutherland LB Thatcher JE DiMaio JM Naseem RH Marshall WS Hill JA Olson EN Dysregulation of microRNAs after myocardial infarction reveals a role of miR‐29 in cardiac fibrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008; 105:13027-13032

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0805038105

  32. 32.

    Condorelli G Morisco C Stassi G Notte A Farina F Sgaramella G de Rienzo A Roncarati R Trimarco B Lembo G Increased cardiomyocyte apoptosis and changes in proapoptotic and antiapoptotic genes bax and bcl‐2 during left ventricular adaptations to chronic pressure overload in the rat. Circulation. 1999; 99:3071-3078

    Not in our library10.1161/01.cir.99.23.3071

  33. 33.

    Kumarswamy R Lyon AR Volkmann I Mills AM Bretthauer J Pahuja A Geers‐Knorr C Kraft T Hajjar RJ Macleod KT Harding SE Thum T SERCA2a gene therapy restores microRNA‐1 expression in heart failure via an Akt/FoxO3a‐dependent pathway. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33:1067-1075

    Not in our library10.1093/eurheartj/ehs043

  34. 34.

    Li Q Song XW Zou J Wang GK Kremneva E Li XQ Zhu N Sun T Lappalainen P Yuan WJ Qin YW Jing Q Attenuation of microRNA‐1 derepresses the cytoskeleton regulatory protein twinfilin‐1 to provoke cardiac hypertrophy. J Cell Sci. 2010; 123:2444-2452

    Not in our library10.1242/jcs.067165

  35. 35.

    Betel D Wilson M Gabow A Marks DS Sander C The microRNA.org resource: targets and expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36:D149-D153

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkm995

  36. 36.

    Zhang HY Chu ML Pan TC Sasaki T Timpl R Ekblom P Extracellular matrix protein fibulin‐2 is expressed in the embryonic endocardial cushion tissue and is a prominent component of valves in adult heart. Dev Biol. 1995; 167:18-26

    Not in our library10.1006/dbio.1995.1003

  37. 37.

    Tsuda T Wang H Timpl R Chu ML Fibulin‐2 expression marks transformed mesenchymal cells in developing cardiac valves, aortic arch vessels, and coronary vessels. Dev Dyn. 2001; 222:89-100

    Not in our library10.1002/dvdy.1172

  38. 38.

    Tsuda T Wu J Gao E Joyce J Markova D Dong H Liu Y Zhang H Zou Y Gao F Miller T Koch W Ma X Chu ML Loss of fibulin‐2 protects against progressive ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012; 52:273-282

    Not in our library10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.11.001

  39. 39.

    Guo H Ingolia NT Weissman JS Bartel DP Mammalian microRNAs predominantly act to decrease target mRNA levels. Nature. 2010; 466:835-840

    Not in our library10.1038/nature09267

  40. 40.

    Lim LP Lau NC Garrett‐Engele P Grimson A Schelter JM Castle J Bartel DP Linsley PS Johnson JM Microarray analysis shows that some microRNAs downregulate large numbers of target mRNAs. Nature. 2005; 433:769-773

    Not in our library10.1038/nature03315

All 57 references

Cited by papers we hold 12

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.