Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Some remarks on certain classes of semilattices

P. V. Ramana Murty, M. Krishna Murty

International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences · 1982

doi:10.1155/s0161171282000039 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

In this paper the concept of a ∗‐semilattice is introduced as a generalization to distributive ∗‐lattice first introduced by Speed [1]. It is shown that almost all the results of Speed can be extended to a more eneral class of distributive ∗‐semilattices. In pseudocomplemented semilattices and distributive semilattices the set of annihilators of an element is an ideal in the sense of Grätzer [2]. But it is not so in general and thus we are led to the definition of a weakly distributive semilattice. In §2 we actually obtain the interesting corollary that a modular ∗‐semilattice is weakly distributive if and only if its dense filter is neutral. In §3 the concept of a sectionally pseudocomplemented semilattice is introduced in a natural way. It is proved that given a sectionally pseudocomplemented semilattice there is a smallest quotient of it which is a sectionally Boolean algebra. Further as a corollary to one of the theorems it is obtained that a sectionally pseudocomplemented semilattice with a dense element becomes a ∗‐semilattice. Finally a necessary and sufficient condition for a ∗‐semilattice to be a pseudocomplemented semilattice is obtained.

Abstract licence: CC BY

References6

    6 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

    Reads

    Read by people on this page

    None yet.

    Checked or read by AI through naulon

    None yet.

    A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

    Are you an author?

    Is this your paper?

    Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.