Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Assessment of Corneal Epithelial Thickness in Asymmetric Keratoconic Eyes and Normal Eyes Using Fourier Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

S. Catalan, L. Cadarso, F. Esteves and 3 more

Journal of Ophthalmology · 2016

doi:10.1155/2016/5697343 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Purpose . To compare the characteristics of asymmetric keratoconic eyes and normal eyes by Fourier domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) corneal mapping. Methods . Retrospective corneal and epithelial thickness OCT data for 74 patients were compared in three groups of eyes: keratoconic ( n = 22 ) and normal fellow eyes ( n = 22 ) in patients with asymmetric keratoconus and normal eyes ( n = 104 ) in healthy subjects. Areas under the curve (AUC) of receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for each variable were compared across groups to indicate their discrimination capacity. Results . Three variables were found to differ significantly between fellow eyes and normal eyes (all p < 0.05 ): minimum corneal thickness, thinnest corneal point, and central corneal thickness. These variables combined showed a high discrimination power to differentiate fellow eyes from normal eyes indicated by an AUC of 0.840 (95% CI: 0.762–0.918). Conclusions . Our findings indicate that topographically normal fellow eyes in patients with very asymmetric keratoconus differ from the eyes of healthy individuals in terms of their corneal epithelial and pachymetry maps. This type of information could be useful for an early diagnosis of keratoconus in topographically normal eyes.

Abstract licence: CC BY

References31

    31 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

    Reads

    Read by people on this page

    None yet.

    Checked or read by AI through naulon

    None yet.

    A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

    Are you an author?

    Is this your paper?

    Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.