Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Comparison of Two Anesthetic Methods for Intravitreal Ozurdex Injection

V. Levent Karabaş, Berna Özkan, Çiğdem Akdağ Koçer and 3 more

Journal of Ophthalmology · 2015

doi:10.1155/2015/861535 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Purpose. To determine whether subconjunctival lidocaine injection maintains additional anesthetic effect during intravitreal Ozurdex injection. Methods. 63 patients who were diagnosed as central or branch retinal vein occlusion and planned to receive Ozurdex injection for macular edema were prospectively included in the study. The patients were randomized into one of the two anesthetic groups. The first group received topical proparacaine drop and lidocaine applied pledget. The second group received subconjunctival lidocaine injection in addition to the anesthetics in group 1. Results. Mean pain score was 1.90±2.39 in group 1 and 1.71 ± 2.09 in group 2 (p=0.746). Mean subconjunctival hemorrhage grade was 1.67±0.17 in group 1 and 0.90±0.14 in group 2 (p=0.001). There was no relationship between the amount of subconjunctival hemorrhage and pain score of the patients. Conclusions. There was no difference in pain scores between the two anesthetic methods. The addition of subconjunctival lidocaine injection offered no advantage in pain relief compared to lidocaine-applied pledgets.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.