Partnerships, Processes, and Outcomes: A Health Equity–Focused Scoping Meta-Review of Community-Engaged Scholarship

Abstract

In recent decades, there has been remarkable growth in scholarship examining the usefulness of community-engaged research (CEnR) and community-based participatory research (CBPR) for eliminating health inequities.This article seeks to synthesize the extant literature of systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and other related reviews regarding the context, processes, and research designs and interventions underlying CEnR that optimize its effectiveness. Through a scoping review, we have utilized an empirically derived framework of CBPR to map this literature and identify key findings and priorities for future research. Our study found 100 reviews of CEnR that largely support the CBPR conceptual framework.

References 142

1. 1.

   Adebayo OW, Salerno JP, Francillon V, Williams JR. 2018. A systematic review of components of community-based organisation engagement. Health Soc. Care Community 26:e474–84

   Not in our library10.1111/hsc.12533 (opens in a new tab)

2. 2.

   Amendola MG. 2011. Empowerment: healthcare professionals’ and community members’ contributions. J. Cult. Divers 18:82–89

   Not in our library

3. 3.

   Anderson LM, Adeney KL, Shinn C, Safranek S, Buckner-Brown J, Krause LK. 2015. Community coalition-driven interventions to reduce health disparities among racial and ethnic minority populations. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev 2015(6):CD00905

   Not in our library10.1002/14651858.cd009905.pub2 (opens in a new tab)

4. 4.

   Andrews JO, Newman SD, Heath J, Williams LB, Tingen MS. 2012. Community-based participatory research and smoking cessation interventions: a review of the evidence. Nurs. Clin. North. Am 47:81–96

   Not in our library10.1016/j.cnur.2011.10.013 (opens in a new tab)

5. 5.

   Anyon Y, Bender K, Kennedy H, Dechants J. 2018. A systematic review of youth participatory action research (YPAR) in the United States: methodologies, youth outcomes, and future directions. Health Educ. Behav 45(6):865–78

   Not in our library10.1177/1090198118769357 (opens in a new tab)

6. 6.

   Arnstein SR. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Plan 35:216–24

   Not in our library

7. 7.

   Attree P, French B, Milton B, Povall S, Whitehead M, Popay J. 2011. The experience of community engagement for individuals: a rapid review of evidence. Health Soc. Care Community 19:250–60

   Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00976.x (opens in a new tab)

8. 8.

   Averill JB. 2016. An ethnographic meta-synthesis of three southwestern rural studies. Public Health Nurs 33:32–41

   Not in our library10.1111/phn.12229 (opens in a new tab)

9. 9.

   Banna J, Bersamin A. 2018. Community involvement in design, implementation and evaluation of nutrition interventions to reduce chronic diseases in indigenous populations in the U.S.: a systematic review. Int. J. Equity Health 17:116

   Not in our library10.1186/s12939-018-0829-6 (opens in a new tab)

10. 10.

    Beaulieu M, Breton M, Brousselle A. 2018. Conceptualizing 20 years of engaged scholarship: a scoping review. PLOS ONE 13:e0193201

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0193201 (opens in a new tab)

11. 11.

    Belone L, Lucero JE, Duran B, Tafoya G, Baker EA, 2016. Community-based participatory research conceptual model: community partner consultation and face validity. Qual. Health Res 26:117–35

    Not in our library10.1177/1049732314557084 (opens in a new tab)

12. 12.

    Bowen DJ, Hyams T, Goodman M, West KM, Harris-Wai J, Yu JH. 2017. Systematic review of quantitative measures of stakeholder engagement. Clin. Transl. Sci 10:314–36

    Not in our library10.1111/cts.12474 (opens in a new tab)

13. 13.

    Bradbury-Jones C, Isham L, Taylor J. 2018. The complexities and contradictions in participatory research with vulnerable children and young people: a qualitative systematic review. Soc. Sci. Med 215:80–91

    Not in our library10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.038 (opens in a new tab)

14. 14.

    Bradford LEA, Okpalauwaekwe U, Waldner CL, Bharadwaj LA. 2016. Drinking water quality in Indigenous communities in Canada and health outcomes: a scoping review. Int. J. Circumpolar Health 75:32336

    Not in our library10.3402/ijch.v75.32336 (opens in a new tab)

15. 15.

    Brandstetter S, Rüter J, Curbach J, Loss J. 2015. A systematic review on empowerment for healthy nutrition in health promotion. Public Health Nutr 18:3146–54

    Not in our library10.1017/s1368980015000270 (opens in a new tab)

16. 16.

    Braveman P 2017. A new definition of health equity to guide future efforts and measure progress. Health Aff. Blog, 6 22

    Not in our library

17. 17.

    Braveman P, Gruskin S. 2003. Defining equity in health. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 57(4):254–58

    Not in our library10.1136/jech.57.4.254 (opens in a new tab)

18. 18.

    Brear M, Hammarberg K, Fisher J. 2018. Community participation in research from resource-constrained countries: a scoping review. Health Promot. Int 33:723–33

    Not in our library10.1093/heapro/dax010 (opens in a new tab)

19. 19.

    Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Herron-Marx S, Hughes J, 2014. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review. Health Expect 17:637–50

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x (opens in a new tab)

20. 20.

    Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Herron-Marx S, Hughes J, 2014. A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities. Patient 7:387–95

    Not in our library10.1007/s40271-014-0065-0 (opens in a new tab)

21. 21.

    Brizay U, Golob L, Globerman J, Gogolishvili D, Bird M, 2015. Community-academic partnerships in HIV-related research: a systematic literature review of theory and practice. J. Int. AIDS Soc 18:19354

    Not in our library10.7448/ias.18.1.19354 (opens in a new tab)

22. 22.

    Brooks JS, Waylen KA, Borgerhoff Mulder M. 2012. How national context, project design, and local community characteristics influence success in community-based conservation projects. PNAS 109:21265–70

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1207141110 (opens in a new tab)

23. 23.

    Brunton G, O’Mara-Eves A, Thomas J. 2014. The ‘active ingredients’ for successful community engagement with disadvantaged expectant and new mothers: a qualitative comparative analysis. J. Adv. Nurs 70:2847–60

    Not in our library10.1111/jan.12441 (opens in a new tab)

24. 24.
    Narratives of community engagement: a systematic review-derived conceptual framework for public health interventions · 2017

    No notice
25. 25.
    Organizational participatory research: a systematic mixed studies review exposing its extra benefits and the key factors associated with them · 2017

    Not checked
26. 26.

    Bush PL, Pluye P, Loignon C, Granikov V, Wright MT, 2018. A systematic mixed studies review on Organizational Participatory Research: towards operational guidance. BMC Health Serv. Res 18:992

    Not in our library10.1186/s12913-018-3775-5 (opens in a new tab)

27. 27.

    Busse JW, Bruno P, Malik K, Connell G, Torrance D, 2014. An efficient strategy allowed English-speaking reviewers to identify foreign-language articles eligible for a systematic review. J. Clin. Epidemiol 67:547–53

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.022 (opens in a new tab)

28. 28.

    Camden C, Shikako-Thomas K, Nguyen T, Graham E, Thomas A, 2015. Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: a scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts. Disabil. Rehabil 37:1390–400

    Not in our library10.3109/09638288.2014.963705 (opens in a new tab)

29. 29.

    Cargo M, Mercer SL. 2008. The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. Annu. Rev. Public Health 29:325–50

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.091307.083824 (opens in a new tab)

30. 30.

    Carter MW, Tregear ML, Lachance CR. 2015. Community engagement in family planning in the U.S.: a systematic review. Am. J. Prev. Med 49:S116–23

    Not in our library10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.029 (opens in a new tab)

31. 31.

    Castaneda SF, Holscher J, Mumman MK, Salgado H, Keir KB, 2012. Dimensions of community and organizational readiness for change. Progress Community Health Partnerships 6:219–26

    Not in our library10.1353/cpr.2012.0016 (opens in a new tab)

32. 32.

    Catalani C, Minkler M. 2010. Photovoice: a review of the literature in health and public health. Health Educ. Behav 37:424–51

    Not in our library10.1177/1090198109342084 (opens in a new tab)

33. 33.

    Chambers LA, Jackson R, Worthington C, Wilson CL, Tharao W, 2018. Decolonizing scoping review methodologies for literature with, for, and by Indigenous Peoples and the African Diaspora: dialoguing with the tensions. Qual. Health Res 28:175–88

    Not in our library10.1177/1049732317743237 (opens in a new tab)

34. 34.

    Chandanabhumma PP, Duran BM, Peterson JC, Pearson CR, Oetzel JG, 2019. Space within the scientific discourse for the voice of the other? Expressions of community voice in the scientific discourse of community-based participatory research. Health Commun 28.

    Not in our library10.1080/10410236.2019.1581409 (opens in a new tab)

35. 35.

    Chen PG, Diaz N, Lucas G, Rosenthal MS. 2010. Dissemination of results in community-based participatory research. Am. J. Prev. Med 39:372–78

    Not in our library10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.021 (opens in a new tab)

36. 36.

    Chuah FLH, Srivastava A, Rajkumar Singh S, Haldane V, Koh HCH, 2018. Community participation in general health initiatives in high and upper-middle income countries: a systematic review exploring the nature of participation, use of theories, contextual drivers and power relations in community participation. Soc. Sci. Med 213:106–22

    Not in our library10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.019 (opens in a new tab)

37. 37.

    Coburn CE, Penuel WR, Geil KE. 2013. Research-practice partnerships: a strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement in school districts White Pap., William T. Grant Found., New York. https://wtgrantfoundation.org/library/uploads/2015/10/Research-Practice-Partnerships-at-the-District-Level.pdf

    Not in our library

38. 38.

    Cohen BE, Marshall SG. 2017. Does public health advocacy seek to redress health inequities? A scoping review. Health Soc. Care Community 25:309–28

    Not in our library10.1111/hsc.12320 (opens in a new tab)

39. 39.

    Conklin A, Morris Z, Nolte E. 2015. What is the evidence base for public involvement in health-care policy? Results of a systematic scoping review. Health Expect 18:153–65

    Not in our library10.1111/hex.12038 (opens in a new tab)

40. 40.

    Cook WK. 2008. Integrating research and action: a systematic review of community-based participatory research to address health disparities in environmental and occupational health in the USA. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 62:668–76

    Not in our library10.1136/jech.2007.067645 (opens in a new tab)

Questions about this paper

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.