No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 23, 2026.
Dominant Bacterial Phyla from the Human Gut Show Widespread Ability To Transform and Conjugate Bile Acids
L. N. Lucas, K. Barrett, R. L. Kerby and 5 more
mSystems · 2021 · CC BY
Abstract
Our current knowledge regarding microbial bile acid transformations comes primarily from biochemical studies on a relatively small number of species or from bioinformatic predictions that rely on homology to known bile acid-transforming enzyme sequences. Therefore, much remains to be learned regarding the variety of bile acid transformations and their representation across gut microbial species.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 23, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
INTRODUCTION
Within the last decade, the central role that the gut microbiota plays in human health has become widely recognized. A fundamental way by which the gut microbiota affects human physiology is via a wide variety of microbially encoded biochemical activities such as vitamin synthesis, production of small organic acids, and modification of bile acids. While each of these has a significant impact on human health, chemical modification of bile acids by gut microbes is of particular interest due to the fact that bacterially modified bile acids can act as signaling molecules (i.e., hormones) within the host and can also directly modulate gut microbiota composition.
The human liver produces two bile acids, termed primary bile acids, from cholesterol: cholic acid (CA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) (Fig. 1). After synthesis, primary bile acids in the liver are conjugated to taurine or glycine, which enhances their solubility and facilitates their circulation within the body. Conjugated bile acids are then shuttled through the gallbladder into the small intestine, where they act as detergents to help emulsify and solubilize fats and facilitate the transport of lipids and lipid soluble vitamins (Fig. 1). As bile acids circulate, the majority (∼95%) are actively absorbed across the distal small intestine wall (Fig. 1). The reabsorbed bile acids are returned to the liver and gallbladder and continue through this cycle, called enterohepatic circulation. However, a small amount (∼5%) escape ileal bile salt transport and enter the large intestine. In the large intestine primarily, but also in the small intestine, bile acids are subjected to chemical modification by bacteria (Fig. 1). Primary bile acids that have been modified by bacteria are termed secondary bile acids; more than 50 secondary bile acids have so far been documented in human feces. Secondary bile acids are passively reabsorbed through the large intestine wall and into the bloodstream, where they join other bile acids undergoing enterohepatic circulation.
One of the most widespread bile acid transformations carried out by gut bacteria is deconjugation (i.e., removal of the glycine or taurine moieties) of glycine- and taurine-conjugated primary bile acids (Fig. 1). The hydrolysis of the amide bond connecting taurine or glycine to the bile acid steroid core is performed by bacterial bile salt hydrolases (BSH). BSH activity appears to be common in gut microbes, though less widespread in Gram-negative than in Gram-positive bacteria. The efficiency by which bile acids are recirculated throughout the body is dependent on their structure; glycine- and taurine-conjugated bile acids are more readily removed from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract by active transport and are also more readily taken up by the liver during systemic circulation. In humans, CA, CDCA, deoxycholic acid (DCA), ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), and lithocholic acid (LCA) can be reconjugated to glycine or taurine by host enzymes in the liver.
Following deconjugation, bacterial production of secondary bile acids can involve several categories of reactions, including dehydroxylation, dehydrogenation, esterification, epimerization, and oxidation. These chemical transformations may be carried out by a single species harboring multiple enzymes or may require the sequential action of different bacterial species, each possessing distinct capabilities. One of the most common enzyme classes in bile acid transformations is hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases (HSDs). HSDs catalyze the reversible oxidation of hydroxyl groups on the C-3, C-7, and C-12 carbon positions of the bile acid steroid core (Fig. 2A to E). HSDs have stereospecificity; for example, a 3α-HSD can oxidize an α-OH group at the C-3 position, whereas a 3β-HSD can oxidize a β-OH group at the C-3 carbon. Thus, the sequential action by both α- and β-HSDs can result in epimerization of an -OH group on the bile acid steroid core. Another well-recognized transformation is the dehydroxylation of the primary bile acids CA and CDCA at the α-oriented hydroxyl group on C-7, which results in the two most common secondary bile acid species, DCA and LCA (Fig. 2F).
Variations in gut microbial community makeup can lead to variable composition of an individual’s bile acid pool, with differential effects on both the host and gut microbiota. Bile acids can bind and modulate the activity of nuclear hormone receptors (NHRs) in the liver, including farnesoid X receptor (FXR), vitamin D receptor (VDR), and the pregnane-activated receptor (PXR), which are involved in the regulation bile acid homeostasis, xenobiotic metabolism, triglyceride metabolism, and glucose metabolism. Bile acids can also modulate activity of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in the intestine, which participate in the regulation of bile acid metabolism, energy expenditure, and glucose metabolism. By interacting with these receptors in the liver and intestine, bile acids can elicit broad effects on host physiology. Deviations from typical bile acid levels have been associated with illnesses such as cholesterol gallstone disease, recurrent GI tract bacterial infections, and liver and colon cancers. There is growing evidence that bile acids produced by HSD activity are involved in the pathogeneses of hormone-dependent cancer, hypertension, and obesity, and high levels of hyodeoxycholic acid (HDCA), a ligand for liver X receptors and GPCRs, have been associated with cholestatic liver disease or intestinal malabsorption. In contrast to the association of bile acids with disease, UDCA is used as a therapeutic for cholesterol gallstones, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and recurrent pancreatitis.
The full variety of bile acid transformations and their representation across gut microbial species are still unknown; current knowledge is primarily based on biochemical studies from a relatively small number of species or bioinformatic searches that rely on known sequences of genes involved in bile acid transformation to make predictions. Because of this, our current knowledge regarding microbial bile acid transformations is not sufficient to predict how a particular microbe impacts the bile acid pool and, thus, host physiology. To shed light on these questions, we performed a systematic in vitro investigation of the bile acid-transforming capabilities of 72 bacterial species commonly found in the human intestinal tract. Our results significantly expand upon the lists of bacterial species known to perform bile acid transformations, and we also identify novel conjugated secondary bile acids. The results of this study will help scientists better understand how the gut microbiome shapes the composition of the bile acid pool.
In vitro screen for bile acid-transforming activity in gut bacteria.
Seventy-two bacterial isolates, representing 70 species across seven phyla found in the human gut, were assessed for their in vitro ability to chemically transform the primary bile acids cholic acid (CA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) and the prominent secondary bile acid deoxycholic acid (DCA) (Table S1). All strains used in this study, with the exception of Clostridium scindens, were previously sequenced, and their genomes are publicly available (Table S1). The C. scindens strain was newly isolated from a human fecal sample (see Materials and Methods). Bacterial isolates were incubated with each of these three bile acids separately (i.e., CA, DCA, and CDCA) at 100 μM concentrations, which are within physiological ranges. In addition, we incubated each isolate with all three bile acids combined, totaling 300 μM. Samples were collected at 24 and 48 h post-inoculation for quantitation of bile acids (see Materials and Methods). We used a non-targeted high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method to screen for the presence of transformed bile acids (39 of which were directly matched to standards), including conjugated bile acids (see Table S2).
We observed that bile acid-transforming activity was highly prevalent among the gut microbes analyzed and was not phylogenetically constrained (Fig. S1). Of the 72 strains screened, we found that 43 (representing 41 species) performed at least one bile acid modification on one or more of the bile acids tested. Of the 43 strains that showed bile acid-transforming capabilities, 32 species were novel bile acid transformers. Additionally, of the 9 species already known to transform bile acids, all showed additional capabilities not previously recognized. The 43 bacterial strains exhibited a range of bile acid transformations: 42 possessed hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD) activity, 5 showed 7α-dehydroxylation activity, and 3 performed other less-well-studied transformations on the bile acid core (Fig. 2, 3, and S1). Interestingly, we also found that 28 strains, representing 27 species, were capable of conjugating bile acids to amino acids. Most strains with bile acid-transforming capabilities were found in the Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, or Bacteroidetes phyla, which were our most heavily sampled phyla.
Our in vitro analysis also revealed a wide range in the efficiency by which different bacterial isolates transform bile acids; for example, some microbes transformed >90% of the added bile acid, while others transformed 5% or less. Most bile acid transformations occurred within 24 h of growth, but several strains displayed a measurable increase in bile acid production from 24 to 48 h (Fig. 3 and S2). Finally, we observed no significant differences (P > 0.05, two-tailed paired t test) in bile acid transformations when bile acid substrates were added individually or in combination.
3α-, 7α-, and 12α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity.
The most common bile acid transformation that we encountered in our screen was oxidation of 3α-, 7α-, or 12α-hydroxyl groups on the steroid core (Fig. 2A to E, 3, S1, and S2). 7α-HSD activity was present in 38 strains and yielded the highest concentrations of secondary bile acids in our screen (Fig. 2B, 3, S1, and S2). On average, the strains that possessed 7α-HSD activity transformed ∼30.8 μM CA (ranging from 0.12 to 66.4 μM) and ∼22.8 μM CDCA (ranging from 0.16 to 93.9 μM) by 48 h (Fig. 3 and Table S3). Members of the Bacteroidaceae family, with the exception of Bacteroides vulgatus, exhibited the highest production of secondary bile acids, transforming 46.1 ± 18.5 μM or 82.4 ± 12.2 μM added CA or CDCA, respectively, into 7-oxo bile acid intermediates by 48 h (Fig. 3 and Table S3). Several strains of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron have been shown to exhibit 7α-HSD activity, but the B. thetaiotaomicron 3731, VPI-5482, and 7330 strains, all of which displayed high bile acid-transforming activity, were not previously described (Fig. 3). Additionally, we corroborated that Bacteroides intestinalis exhibited 7α-HSD activity on both CA and CDCA. Also consistent with previous findings, we found that Escherichia coli K-12 substrain MG1655 possessed 7α-HSD activity, acting on both CA and CDCA.
We observed 3α-HSD activity in 25 isolates, 16 of which were Firmicutes, mostly in the Lachnospiraceae family (Fig. 2D, 3, and S2). On average, these strains displayed much lower activity than those possessing 7α-HSD activity (Fig. 4A). By 48 h, the average concentrations of secondary bile acids produced by 3α-HSD activity were ∼0.93 μM (ranging from 0.12 to 2.29 μM) for CA, ∼0.97 μM (ranging from 0.10 to 9.35 μM) for CDCA, and ∼1.54 μM (ranging from 0.16 to 7.23 μM) for DCA (Fig. 3 and Table S3). Most strains that exhibited 3α-HSD activity only acted on one or two of the bile acid substrates, but two of three Collinsella strains and all three Ruminococcus strains tested were able to transform all three added bile acids, CA, CDCA, and DCA (Fig. 3). Furthermore, these five strains produced the highest concentrations of 3-oxo bile acids (Fig. 3 and Table S3). Collinsella aerofaciens has only been shown to produce 3-oxoCA from CA; thus, production of 3-oxoDCA and 3-oxoCDCA expand upon its previously known bile acid-transforming capabilities. Our lab isolate of C. scindens produced 3-oxoCDCA from CDCA and 3-oxoCA from CA but did not produce 3-oxoDCA from DCA (Fig. 3 and S2), which is consistent with a previous study reporting that both C. scindens VPI 12708 and C. scindens ATCC 35704 produce 3-oxo bile acids from both CA and CDCA.
12α-HSD activity was detected in 12 strains (Fig. 2C, 3, S1, and S2). 12α-HSD activity was previously detected primarily in the genus Clostridium, but our results show it to be much more widespread (Fig. 3 and S1). Members of the Firmicutes and Actinobacteria phyla produced higher concentrations of 12-oxo bile acids than members of the Bacteroidetes (Fig. 3 and S1). On average, strains that exhibited 12α-HSD activity transformed ∼2.0 μM CA (ranging from 0.09 to 7.92 μM) and ∼9.74 μM DCA (ranging from 0.19 to 28.6 μM) at 48 h, a level of activity that is intermediate between the 7α-HSD and 3α-HSD activities discussed above (Fig. 3 and 4A; Table S3). In several instances, the 12-oxo bile acid concentration increased significantly between 24 and 48 h (P < 0.005, two-tailed paired t test) (Fig. 3 and S2).
12α-HSD activity on bile acids was demonstrated previously in 7α-dehydroxylating bacteria Clostridium leptum, C. scindens, and Clostridium hylemonae as well as in the gut commensal C. aerofaciens. We observed that C. hylemonae produced 12-oxo bile acids from CA and DCA, but we did not observe 12α-HSD activity in C. leptum and C. scindens (Fig. 3). Consistent with previous observations, we found that C. aerofaciens transformed CA and CDCA into 12-oxoCDCA and 12-oxoLCA, respectively.
Lastly, we found that Holdemania filiformis produced a small amount of 7, 12-dioxoLCA from CA by 48 h (Fig. 3 and S2, and Table S3). The transformation of CA to 7, 12-dioxoLCA requires both 7α-dehydrogenation and 12α-dehydrogenation on the same molecule; while we identified 5 strains capable of performing both dehydrogenations on CA, only H. filiformis produced the doubly modified bile acid (Fig. 2E).
Specificity of α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity.
A comparison between the amounts of secondary bile acids produced by HSD activity at the 3α-, 7α-, and 12α-positions within each strain revealed interesting trends (Fig. 4B). For example, in nearly all isolates, 3α-HSD and 12α-HSD activity exhibited preference toward DCA and/or CDCA over CA (Fig. 4B). For 7α-HSD activity, there was a slight preference toward CDCA over CA for most microbes. However, some isolates, such as H. filiformis and Alistipes indistinctus, showed a clear preference for CA over CDCA, while C. scindens and B. ovatus exhibited a marked preference for CDCA over CA (Fig. 3 and S2; Table S3).
Bacterial isolates also showed some specificity regarding the types of HSD activity they displayed. That is, of the 42 strains that possessed HSDs, 14 showed only one type of HSD activity (3 species were able to act at C-3, 10 species at C-7, and 1 species at C-12), 21 displayed two types of HSD activity, and only 5 isolates possessed all three types of HSD activity (Fig. 3 and S1).
7α-Dehydroxylation activity.
Bile acid 7α-dehydroxylation (e.g., transformation of CA into DCA, and CDCA into LCA) (Fig. 2F) is a multistep pathway performed by the bile acid inducible (bai) operon, which encodes seven enzymes and a transporter. This pathway is reported to be highly conserved and has primarily been observed in Clostridia species, but our results suggest it to be more widespread (Fig. 3 and S1).
In our screen, 7α-dehydroxylation of CA to DCA was more prevalent than 7α-dehydroxylation of CDCA to LCA (Fig. 3). We found 5 strains capable of 7α-dehydroxylation: Bacteroides vulgatus, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, and Roseburia intestinalis dehydroxylated CA, C. scindens dehydroxylated CDCA, and C. hylemonae dehydroxylated both CA and CDCA.
Three previously reported 7α-dehydroxylating strains are C. hylemonae DSM 15053, C. scindens ATCC 35704, and C. leptum ATCC 29065. C. leptum ATCC 29065 and C. scindens ATCC 35704 have been shown to dehydroxylate both CA and CDCA, while C. hylemonae DSM 15053 has been shown to only dehydroxylate CA. We were unable to reproduce 7α-dehydroxylation of both CA and CDCA in C. leptum ATCC 29065 but observed that C. hylemonae DSM 15053 dehydroxylated CA to DCA as previously reported. Our C. scindens isolate showed inconsistent low-level production of LCA from CDCA and DCA from CA (Fig. 3 and Table S3).
Of all five strains we found to perform 7α-dehydroxylation, only C. hylemonae possessed the canonical bai operon, encoding BaiA2, BaiB, BaiCD, BaiE, BaiF, BaiG, and BaiH but not BaiI (see Materials and Methods). Interestingly, our lab isolate of C. scindens, which displayed only low levels of the expected 7α-dehydroxylation activity, also possessed the canonical bai operon without baiI. However, when comparing our C. scindens isolate to the previously sequenced C. scindens VPI 12708, we identified one mismatch in the protein sequences for BaiB (amino acid substitution H214L) and BaiH (amino acid substitution V526A) and two mismatches in BaiE (amino acid substitutions T74S and A95E). It is possible that these alterations were enough to decrease its 7α-dehydroxylation activity, but further analyses will need to be performed to support this hypothesis. Finally, R. intestinalis, B. vulgatus, and B. adolescentis were all predicted to possess only four or five genes of the canonical eight-gene operon. This suggests that divergent or nonhomologous genes may encode the 7α-dehydroxylation activity in the newly identified strains.
Other bile acid transformations: hydroxyl group conversions at C-6 and C-7.
Consistent with previous reports, we observed that both C. aerofaciens and Ruminococcus gnavus produced small amounts of UDCA from CDCA (Fig. 3 and S2). The transformation of CDCA to UDCA requires the combined action of 7α- and 7β-HSDs to epimerize the C-7 hydroxyl group on the steroid core (Fig. 2A and G). This bile acid transformation is of particular interest, because UDCA is used therapeutically to treat gastrointestinal tract diseases.
Another bile acid transformation of interest is conversion of DCA to HDCA (Fig. 2G). Collinsella stercoris produced 1.55 μM HDCA from DCA at 48 h (Fig. 3 and S2). While the enzymes responsible for this transformation are not known, it is almost certainly a multistep mechanism involving α-dehydroxylation of the C-12 hydroxyl group followed by a hydroxylation on C-6.
To the best of our knowledge, production of β-muricholic acid (β-MCA) by human gut isolates has not been previously reported. Here, we found that R. gnavus can transform CA to β-MCA (Fig. 2G, 3, and S2). This transformation requires α-dehydroxylation at C-12, epimerization of the C-7 hydroxyl group of CA, and addition of a hydroxyl group at the C-6 position. Interestingly, bacterial 12α-dehydroxylation of bile acids appears to be a rare transformation.
Amino acid conjugation of bile acids by gut bacteria.
Our in vitro screen revealed that 25 strains, representing 24 species, were capable of conjugating DCA, CDCA, or CA to glycine in vitro (Fig. 5A and Table S4). Twenty-three strains produced up to 1.02 μM (averaging ∼0.236 μM at 48 h) of glycodeoxycholic acid (GDCA) from DCA, 16 strains produced up to 0.70 μM (averaging ∼0.145 μM at 48 h) of glycochenodeoxycholic acid (GCDCA) from CDCA, and 7 strains produced up to 0.098 μM (averaging 0.036 μM at 48 h) of glycocholic acid (GCA) from CA (Fig. 5A and Table S4). To our knowledge, this is the first report of bacterially mediated reconjugation of bile acids to glycine.
In addition to the microbial conjugation of CDCA, DCA, and CA to glycine, we also observed glycine conjugation to the most prominent secondary bile acid produced in our screen, 7-oxolithocholic acid (7-oxoLCA) (Fig. 5, S3, and Table S4). All strains that could perform this conjugation were members of the Bacteroidaceae and produced detectable amounts of glycol-7-oxolithocholic (G-7-oxoLCA) acid when provided with CDCA as a substrate.
A recent study reported that the mouse microbiome is capable of conjugating CA to the amino acids phenylalanine, tyrosine, and leucine and showed that Enterocloster (formerly Clostridium) bolteae can carry out CA conjugations to phenylalanine and tyrosine in vitro. Guided by these data, we searched our data for the presence of bile acids conjugated to amino acids. We found that 28 isolates, representing 27 species, were capable of conjugating CDCA, DCA, or CA to one or more of the following amino acids: glutamate, glutamine, aspartate, asparagine, methionine, histidine, lysine, serine, tryptophan, valine, alanine, and arginine; they were also able to conjugate to the previously described phenylalanine, leucine/isoleucine, or tyrosine (Fig. 5 and S3). In total, we identified 44 novel amino acid-bile acid conjugates. The amino acids most frequently conjugated to bile acids were glycine and phenylalanine (Fig. 5 and S3). CDCA and DCA were conjugated to amino acids much more frequently than CA. Of these 28 isolates, 25 overlapped with strains that possessed the ability to conjugate bile acids to glycine (Fig. 5, S3, and Table S4). To corroborate the identification of conjugated bile acids, we used tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) to generate high-resolution spectra for each conjugated bile acid of interest (Fig. 5B); these spectra displayed the expected fragmentation patterns (Table S5).
Interestingly, in some bacterial strains, we noticed double chromatographic peaks corresponding to the exact masses and with the expected characteristic MS/MS spectra for bile acids conjugated to alanine or valine (Fig. S4, Table S5). Enantiomers, which have the same mass, can have different retention times; thus, this observation suggests that some bacterial strains are conjugating both d- and l-alanine or valine to CDCA, DCA, or CA (Fig. S4 and Table S5).
Our results indicate that the ability to conjugate amino acids to primary and secondary bile acids is widespread among gut microbes (Fig. 5 and S3; Table S4). Bile acid conjugation to taurine was not observed in our screen, either because organisms lack the necessary enzymes or because the growth medium did not supply sufficient amounts of the compound. Further investigation is required to determine the possibility of microbial taurine conjugation to bile acids. The enzymes responsible for amino acid conjugation are currently unknown, and while it is plausible that microbial BSH may participate in glycine conjugation, it is unclear what enzymes would be responsible for bile acid conjugation to all other amino acids. Interestingly, we saw most conjugation ability in the Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes, which are the same three phyla reported to possess glycine reconjugation activity and BSH activity. In addition, most species fall into three families: Bifidobacteriaceae, Lachnospiraceae, and Bacteroidaceae (Fig. 5 and S1). The physiological effects of amino acid-conjugated bile acid—other than those conjugated to glycine or taurine—are unknown, although it was recently reported that cholic acid conjugated to phenylalanine, leucine, and tyrosine can act as FXR agonists and are enriched in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and cystic fibrosis. In addition, it is unknown whether bile acid conjugation to amino acids other than glycine or taurine enhances their intestinal absorption and enterohepatic circulation. Further studies are required to investigate these important questions.
Comparison of bioinformatically predicted and observed HSD activity.
A previous study by Kisiela et al. included a bioinformatic search for 3α-, 7α-, and 12α-HSD homologs in all sequenced bacteria and archaea (at the time of analysis) and identified putative HSDs across numerous genera. The study, which evaluated 69 of our 72 bacterial strains, used known protein sequences to identify HSD homologues. They predicted 22 of the 40 bacterial species that exhibited HSD activity in this in vitro study. We were able to confirm all predicted HSD activities (3α-, 7α-, and 12α-HSD) in all species except two (C. hylemonae and C. scindens). We confirmed 7 of 8 species predicted to possess 3α-HSD activity, 6 of which were an exact strain match, 10 of 10 species predicted to possess 7α-HSD activity, 8 of which were an exact strain match, and 9 of 10 species predicted to possess 12α-HSD activity, 9 of which were an exact strain match (Fig. S1 and Table S6). Although C. hylemonae was predicted to possess both 3α- and 12α-HSD activity, we observed 7α- and 12α-HSD activity in our screen and only trace 3α-HSD activity (i.e., production of 3-oxoCDCA from CDCA of less than 0.1 μM). Interestingly, prior in vitro studies on C. hylemonae showed only a functional 12α-HSD but not a 3α- or 7α-HSD. In addition, C. scindens was predicted to possess 3α-, 7α-, and 12α-HSD activity, but in our lab isolate, under the specified experimental conditions, we only observed 3α- and 7α-HSD. Of the 69 sequenced species that overlap between our in vitro study and the Kisiela et al. bioinformatic analysis, we found many species that displayed HSD activity that were not predicted by their analysis (see Table S6). We identified 13 additional species (13 strains) with 3α-HSD activity, 24 additional species (26 strains) with 7α-HSD activity, and 2 additional species (3 strains) with 12α-HSD activity (Fig. S1 and Table S6). This suggests that there are yet to be identified HSDs with low or no homology to currently known enzymes or that some low-level transformations may represent nonspecific enzyme catalysis.
A different study by Doden et al. used a bioinformatics approach to identify bacteria with previously unreported 12α-HSD activity. They predicted 12α-HSDs to be widespread among the phyla Firmicutes and Actinobacteria. Our results confirmed the predicted 12α-HSD activity in 11 species identified by their analysis (Fig. S1 and Table S6). Interestingly, their study predicted 12α-HSD activity in 10 species belonging to the phylum Bacteroidetes that we analyzed in our in vitro screen, but we only observed 12α-HSD activity in two of them. The reason for this discrepancy is unknown, but it is plausible that Bacteroidetes species only induce 12α-HSD activity under specific growth conditions, and the specific medium used in this study (see Materials and Methods) may have suppressed the expression of these class of enzymes. It is worth pointing out that the study by Kisiela et al. only identified two Bacteroidetes strains with 12-HSD activity, Bacteroides pectinophilus and Bacteroides fragilis (neither of which were assessed in our study), while Doden et al. identified a large number of Bacteroidetes strains with this activity, including both aforementioned strains and 12 of the species analyzed in this study (Table S6). The discrepancies between these two studies are likely a reflection of the distinct methodologies used and the specific selection of seed gene sequences, but they also highlight the difficulty in accurately predicting HSD activity from gene sequence homology.
To provide further insight into this issue, we performed a bioinformatic search to predict HSD proteins in our strains based on known sequences (Table S6) (see Materials and Methods). As summarized in Table S6, the predictions of our own bioinformatic analysis showed fair overlap with the Kisiela et al. and Doden et al. studies but still failed to predict the observed in vitro bile acid-transforming HSD activity of many species. Overall, these results suggest that nonhomologous genes may be responsible for the observed in vitro HSD activity, but further research is required to determine what combination of mutations, deletions, gene duplications, or gene regulation might be responsible for causing discrepancies between observed and predicted HSD activity. In addition, bile acid-transforming activity may be influenced by the gut environment and interspecies interactions in vivo.
Conclusion.
Our results greatly expand upon the lists of organisms known to perform different types of bile acid transformations. The high prevalence of bile acid transformations, with few discernible patterns based on phylogeny, illustrates the widespread distribution of bile acid-transforming capabilities across human gut bacteria. We anticipate that knowledge generated by this study will facilitate engineering of synthetic microbial communities with predictable effects on bile acid composition in in vivo systems, which will be vital for assessing the physiological effects of microbially transformed bile acids. A new suite of questions can now be asked about how bacteria act by themselves or in concert with others to transform bile acids and generate a diverse bile acid pool.
Strains and media.
All strains are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material. All strains were grown on Mega medium, which was filter sterilized and stored in a Coy anaerobic chamber (5% H2, 20% CO2, and 75% N2) at least 24 h prior to use. Mega medium contains (per liter tap distilled water): 100 ml (1 M, pH 7.2) potassium phosphate buffer, 10 g tryptone peptone, 5 g yeast extract, 5 g meat extract, 4 ml (25 mg/100 ml) resazurin, 1.8 g d-glucose, 0.9 g d-maltose, 0.86 g d-cellobiose, 0.46 g d-fructose, 1 g sodium acetate trihydrate, 0.02 g MgSO4·7H2O, 2.1 g NaHCO3, 0.08 g NaCl, 1 ml (0.8 g/100 ml) CaCl2, 1 ml (1 mg/ml in 100% ethanol) vitamin K3 (menadione), 1 ml (1.2 mg hematin/ml in 0.2 M histidine, pH 8.0) histidine hematin, 2 ml (25% [vol/vol]) Tween 80, 10 ml ATCC MD-VS vitamin mix, 10 ml ATCC MD-TMS trace mineral mix, 1 ml (40 mg/100 ml) FeSO4·7H2O, and 0.5 g l-cysteine HCl. For cultures of Akkermansia muciniphila, the medium was amended with 0.5 mg/ml mucin. This specific medium was designed to allow growth of all species in this study. Clostridium scindens was isolated from a quercetin-degrading anaerobic enrichment inoculated with a human fecal sample. The C. scindens genome was sequenced by the Microbial Genome Sequencing Center (MiGS, Pittsburgh PA). Genome hybrid assembly with Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) reads was performed using he Unicycler v.0.4.8 pipeline; 1.083 Gbp Illumina reads and 1.004 Gbp ONT reads were assembled into a single contig of 3,941,835 bp (530× coverage) with 47.61% GC content. Assembly annotation was performed using Prokka v.1.14.5. The genome sequence data of the C. scindens strain isolated in this study can be accessed with the NCBI reference sequence NZ_CP080442.1.
Sample handling and growth conditions.
Strains were grown at 37°C in an anaerobic chamber with an atmosphere of 75% N2, 20% CO2, and 5% H2. Starting from freezer stocks, strains were first grown overnight to a high density (optical density at 600 nm [OD600] range of 0.349 to 1.9, measured directly in the tube) in Hungate tubes containing Mega medium. These cultures were then used to inoculate (1:15 dilution) 3 ml of Mega medium in 5-ml polypropylene tubes, amended with bile acids. There were 5 sets of conditions for the quantitative screen of bile acid-transforming activity. Under the first three conditions, medium contained one of each of the three bile acids, cholic acid (CA), chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), or deoxycholic acid (DCA), at 100 μM each. Under the fourth condition, all three bile acids were combined, totaling 300 μM. Under the fifth condition (control), no bile acids were provided. In addition, we tested for spontaneous bile acid degradation or transformation in uninoculated controls containing bile acids. At 24 and 48 h after inoculation, 1 ml of culture was collected and spun down at room temperature for 10 min at 10,000 × g, and the supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube. The supernatant was diluted to 1:100 using ultrahigh-pressure liquid chromatography (uHPLC)-grade H2O, and 100 μl was transferred to an HPLC vial for analysis. In addition to the qualitative screen, we also carried out an initial qualitative screen in which strains were grown in 96-well plates (200-μl cultures) for 24 h with bile acids mixed totaling 300 μM. In combination, 5 independent measurements of bile acid-transforming activity were carried out for each bacterial strain in this study: four quantitative measurements and an initial qualitative assessment.
uHPLC-MS/MS measurements.
Samples were analyzed using an ultrahigh-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (uHPLC-MS/MS) system consisting of a Thermo Scientific Vanquish uHPLC system coupled to a heated electrospray ionization (HESI; using negative polarity) and hybrid quadrupole high-resolution mass spectrometer (Q Exactive Orbitrap; Thermo Scientific). Settings for the ion source were as follows: auxiliary gas flow rate of 10, sheath gas flow rate of 30, sweep gas flowrate of 1, 2.5-kV spray voltage, 320°C capillary temperature, 300°C heater temperature, and S-lens radiofrequency (RF) level of 50%. Nitrogen was used as nebulizing gas by the ion trap source. Liquid chromatography (LC) separation was achieved using a Waters Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column with 1.7-μm particle size, 2.1 by 100 mm in length. Solvent A was water with 10 mM ammonium acetate adjusted to pH 6.0 with acetic acid. Solvent B was 100% methanol. The total run time was 31.5 min with the following gradient: a 0- to 24-min gradient from 30% solvent B (initial condition) to 100% solvent B; hold 5 min at 100% solvent B; drop to 30% solvent B for 2.5-min reequilibration to initial condition. The flow rate was 200 μl/min throughout. Other LC parameters were as follows: autosampler temperature, 4°C; injection volume, 10 μl; column temperature, 50°C. The MS method performed a full MS1 full scan (290 to 1,000 m/z) together with a series of parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) scans. These MS2 scans (all-ion fragmentation) were centered at m/z values of 370, 408, 446, 484, and 522; each using an isolation width of 40.0 m/z. Fragmentations were performed at 60 normalized collision energy (NCE). All scans used a resolution value of 70,000, an automatic gain control (ACG) target value of 1E6, and a maximum injection time (IT) of 40 ms. Experimental MS data were converted to the mzXML format and used for bile acid identification. Bile acid peaks were identified using MAVEN (metabolomics analysis and visualization engine). For tandem mass spectrometry of conjugated bile acids, MS2 scans (selected ion fragmentation) were performed at 20, 30, and 40 NCE (normalized collision energy). All scans used a resolution value of 17,500, an automatic gain control (ACG) target value of 1E6, and a maximum injection time (IT) of 40 ms.
Determination of bile acid concentrations.
Bile acid quantitation was achieved using standard concentrations of each bile acid ranging from 0.01 μg/ml (or 0.019 μM to 0.027 μM depending on the bile acid) to 1 μg/ml (or 1.94 μM to 2.65 μM depending on the bile acid) to generate five-point standard curves. The detection limit was below 0.05 μM for all bile acids. The threshold for reported core bile acid transformations was 0.1 μM. Standards were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids and dissolved and stored in methanol at −80°C. See Table S2 for bile acid standard names and structural features. For bile acids conjugated to amino acids, compounds were identified by their exact mass (mass error of less than 2 ppm) and predicted retention times but could not be quantified, since standards are not commercially available (Table S5). The only exceptions were bile acids conjugated to glycine (i.e., GDCA and CDCA), for which standards were available.
BLASTP search for the bai operon
Bacterial genomes were downloaded from NCBI ftp site using GenBank assemblies (GCA) or RefSeq assemblies (GCF). Eight amino acid sequences from Clostridium scindens VPI 12708 were downloaded from UniProt and used as reference sequences: BaiB (P19409), BaiCD (P19410), BaiE (P19412), BaiA2 (P19413), BaiF (P19413), BaiG (P32369), BaiH (P32370), and BaiI (P32371). Each of these eight Bai proteins were searched against all protein coding genes (CDS) from the downloaded bacterial genomes, with an E value threshold of 1E−10. Gene coordinates (start position, end position, strand) in the genome were obtained from the GFF file on the NCBI ftp site. A bai operon was considered highly homologous if gene queries yielded eight bai operon genes within a close genome region (<100,000 bp).
Hidden Markov model search for the HSD gene.
Bacterial genomes were downloaded from the NCBI ftp site using GenBank assemblies (GCA) or RefSeq assemblies (GCF). To annotate 3α-, 7α-, 12α-HSD genes, hidden Markov model (HMM) searches were performed using custom HMM profiles against all protein coding genes (CDS) from the downloaded bacterial genomes. To generate 3α-, 7α-, 12α-HSD HMM profiles, reference sequences were downloaded from UniProt, and only reviewed (Swiss-Prot) sequences or sequences validated by experiments in the literature were used: for 3α-HSD, reference sequences included Q59718 (Pseudomonas sp. B-0831), P80702 (Pseudomonas testosteroni), A7B3K3 (Ruminococcus gnavus strain ATCC 29149/VPI C7-9), C8WMP0 (Eggerthella lenta), P19337 (Clostridium scindens strain JCM 10418/VPI 12708), and P07914 (Clostridium scindens strain JCM 10418/VPI 12708). For 7α-HSD, reference sequences included P0AET8 (Escherichia coli strain K-12), Q8YIN7 (Brucella melitensis biotype 1 strain 16M/ATCC 23456/NCTC 10094), Q5LA59 (Bacteroides fragilis strain ATCC 25285/DSM 2151/JCM 11019/NCTC 9343), G9FRD7 (Clostridium absonum), and P50200 (Clostridium sordellii). For 12α-HSD, reference sequences validated by Doden et al. were used, including C0BWQ2 (Clostridium hylemonae DSM 15053), P21215 (Clostridium sp. strain ATCC 29733/VPI C48-50), R7AM69 (Eggerthella sp. CAG:298), C8WLK7 (Eubacterium lentum strain ATCC 25559/DSM 2243/JCM 9979/NCTC 11813/VPI 0255), B0NG52 (Clostridium scindens strain ATCC 35704/DSM 5676/VPI 13733/19), and B6FYX7 (Clostridium hiranonis strain DSM 13275/JCM 10541/KCTC 15199/TO-931). Reference sequences from each HSD were aligned using MUSCLE version 3.8.31, and the HMM profile was constructed using hmmbuild3. All CDS in bacterial genomes were searched using HMM search version 3.2.1. The identified cutoff in each profile HMM was determined by a minimal bit score to maximize the F measure. In each 3α-, 7α-, and 12α-HSD profile HMM, the positive group was defined as its reference sequences, and the negative group was defined as a combination of the other two references. For example, the positive group for the 3α-HSD profile HMM was six 3α-HSD reference sequences, and the negative group for the 3α-HSD profile HMM was the combined 7α- and 12α-HSD reference sequences. The F measure score was defined as follows: F = 2/(recall−1 + precision−1), where “recall” is the true positive/(true positive + false negative) and “precision” is the true positive/(true positive + false positive). By this procedure, the cutoff for 3α-HSD was 146.1, the cutoff for 7α-HSD was 220.6, and the cutoff for 3α-HSD was 120.2.
All identified HSD genes together with HMM reference sequences were aligned with MUSCLE version 3.8.31. Conserved motif sequences were visualized by WebLogo3.
Phylogenetic tree construction.
We used publicly available full genomes and constructed the tree using the Genome Clustering tool using the Joint Genome Institute’s IMG/MER, which is based on hierarchical clustering of the taxonomy of selected genera (Fig. S1; Table S1).
Data availability.
The HMM search file is publicly available at https://github.com/qijunz/Lucas_BA_paper. C. scindens genome sequence data have been deposited in NCBI under reference sequence NZ_CP080442.1.
References 72
- 1.
- 2.
Zhou H, Hylemon PB. 2014. Bile acids are nutrient signaling hormones. Steroids 86:62–68. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/j.steroids.2014.04.016
- 3.
De Aguiar Vallim TQ, Tarling EJ, Edwards PA. 2013. Pleiotropic roles of bile acids in metabolism. Cell Metab 17:657–669. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2013.03.013
- 4.
Li T, Chiang JYL. 2014. Bile acid signaling in metabolic disease and drug therapy. Pharmacol Rev 66:948–983. doi:.
Not in our library10.1124/pr.113.008201
- 5.
Ridlon JM, Bajaj JS. 2015. The human gut sterolbiome: bile acid-microbiome endocrine aspects and therapeutics. Acta Pharm Sin B 5:99–105. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/j.apsb.2015.01.006
- 6.
Duboc H, Taché Y, Hofmann AF. 2014. The bile acid TGR5 membrane receptor: from basic research to clinical application. Dig Liver Dis 46:302–312. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/j.dld.2013.10.021
- 7.
Wang H, Chen J, Hollister K, Sowers LC, Forman BM. 1999. Endogenous bile acids are ligands for the nuclear receptor FXR/BAR. Mol Cell 3:543–553. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80348-2
- 8.
Begley M, Gahan CGM, Hill C. 2005. The interaction between bacteria and bile. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:625–651. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/j.femsre.2004.09.003
- 9.
Midtvedt T. 1974. Microbial bile acid transformation. Am J Clin Nutr 27:1341–1347. doi:.
Not in our library10.1093/ajcn/27.11.1341
- 10.
Jones BV, Begley M, Hill C, Gahan CGM, Marchesi JR. 2008. Functional and comparative metagenomic analysis of bile salt hydrolase activity in the human gut microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:13580–13585. doi:.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0804437105
- 11.
- 12.
Ridlon J, Kang D, Hylemon P, Bajaj J. 2014. Bile acids and the gut microbiome. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 30:332–338. doi:.
Not in our library10.1097/mog.0000000000000057
- 13.
- 14.
Chassaing B, Gewirtz AT. 2018. Gut microbiome and metabolism. In Said HM, Ghishan FK, Kaunitz JD, Merchant JL, Wood JD (ed), Physiology of the gastrointestinal tract, 6th ed. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom.
Not in our library
- 15.
Quinn RA, Melnik AV, Vrbanac A, Fu T, Patras KA, Christy M, Bodai Z, Belda-Ferre P, Tripathi A, Chung LK, Downes M, Welch RD, Quinn M, Humphrey G, Panitchpakdi M, Weldon K, Aksenov A, da Silva R, Avila-Pacheco J, Clish C, Bae S, Mallick H, Franzosa EA, Lloyd-Price J, Bussell R, Thron T, Nelson AT, Wang M, Leszczynski E, Vargas F, Gauglitz JM, Meehan MJ, Gentry E, Arthur TD, Komor AC, Poulsen O, Boland BS, Chang JT, Sandborn WJ, Lim M, Garg N, Lumeng JC, Xavier RJ, Kazmierczak BI, Jain R, Egan M, Rhee KE, Ferguson D, Raffatellu M, Vlamakis H, et al. 2020. Global chemical impact of the microbiome includes novel bile-acid conjugations. Nature 579:123–129. doi:.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2047-9
- 16.
Wegner K, Just S, Gau L, Mueller H, Gérard P, Lepage P, Clavel T, Rohn S. 2017. Rapid analysis of bile acids in different biological matrices using LC-ESI-MS/MS for the investigation of bile acid transformation by mammalian gut bacteria. Anal Bioanal Chem 409:1231–1245. doi:.
Not in our library10.1007/s00216-016-0048-1
- 17.
Batta AK, Salen G, Arora R, Shefer S, Batta M, Person A. 1990. Side chain conjugation prevents bacterial 7-dehydroxylation of bile acids. J Biol Chem 265:10925–10928. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/s0021-9258(19)38535-7
- 18.
Chikai T, Nakao H, Uchida K. 1987. Deconjugation of bile acids by human intestinal bacteria implanted in germ-free rats. Lipids 22:669–671. doi:.
Not in our library10.1007/bf02533948
- 19.
Liang L, Yi Y, Lv Y, Qian J, Lei X, Zhang G. 2018. A comprehensive genome survey provides novel insights into bile salt hydrolase (BSH) in Lactobacillaceae. Molecules 23:1157. doi:.
Not in our library10.3390/molecules23051157
- 20.
Gopal-Srivastava R, Hylemon PB. 1988. Purification and characterization of bile salt hydrolase from Clostridium perfringens. J Lipid Res 29:1079–1085. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/s0022-2275(20)38464-9
- 21.
Jarocki P, Zdzisław T, Ski T. 2013. Genetic diversity of bile salt hydrolases among human intestinal bifidobacteria. Curr Microbiol 67:286–292. doi:.
Not in our library10.1007/s00284-013-0362-1
- 22.
Smet D, Van Hoorde L, Vande Woestyne M, Christiaens H, Verstraete W. 1995. Significance of bile salt hydrolytic activities of lactobacilli. J Appl Bacterio l79:292–301. doi:.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2672.1995.tb03140.x
- 23.
Stellwag EJ, Hylemon PB. 1976. Purification and characterization of bile salt hydrolase from Bacteroides fragilis subsp. fragilis. Biochim Biophys Acta 452:165–176. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/0005-2744(76)90068-1
- 24.
Hofmann AF, Hagey LR. 2014. Key discoveries in bile acid chemistry and biology and their clinical applications: history of the last eight decades. J Lipid Re s55:1553–1595. doi:.
Not in our library10.1194/jlr.r049437
- 25.
Hofmann AF, Hagey LR. 2008. Bile acids: chemistry, pathochemistry, biology, pathobiology, and therapeutics. Cell Mol Life Sci 65:2461–2483. doi:.
Not in our library10.1007/s00018-008-7568-6
- 26.
Kisiela M, Skarka A, Ebert B, Maser E. 2012. Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases (HSDs) in bacteria - a bioinformatic perspective. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 129:31–46. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.08.002
- 27.
Doden H, Sallam LA, Devendran S, Ly L, Doden G, Daniel SL, Alves JMP, Ridlon JM. 2018. Metabolism of oxo-bile acids and characterization of recombinant 12α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases from bile acid 7α-dehydroxylating human gut bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e00235-18. doi:.
Not in our library10.1128/aem.00235-18
- 28.
Liu L, Aigner A, Schmid RD. 2011. Identification, cloning, heterologous expression, and characterization of a NADPH-dependent 7β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase from Collinsella aerofaciens. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 90:127–135. doi:.
Not in our library10.1007/s00253-010-3052-y
- 29.
Lee JY, Arai H, Nakamura Y, Fukiya S, Wada M, Yokota A. 2013. Contribution of the 7β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase from Ruminococcus gnavus N53 to ursodeoxycholic acid formation in the human colon. J Lipid Res 54:3062–3069. doi:.
Not in our library10.1194/jlr.m039834
- 30.
Ridlon J, Kang D, Hylemon PB. 2010. Isolation and characterization of a bile acid inducible 7α-dehydroxylating operon in Clostridium hylemonae TN271. Anaerobe 16:137–146. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/j.anaerobe.2009.05.004
- 31.
Reference deleted.
Not in our library
- 32.
Reference deleted.
Not in our library
- 33.
- 34.
Staley C, Weingarden AR, Khoruts A, Sadowsky MJ. 2017. Interaction of gut microbiota with bile acid metabolism and its influence on disease states. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101:47–64. doi:.
Not in our library10.1007/s00253-016-8006-6
- 35.
Wells JE, Berr F, Thomas LA, Dowling RH, Hylemon PB. 2000. Isolation and characterization of cholic acid 7α-dehydroxylating fecal bacteria from cholesterol gallstone patients. J Hepatol 32:4–10. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/s0168-8278(00)80183-x
- 36.
Weingarden AR, Chen C, Bobr A, Yao D, Lu Y, Nelson VM, Sadowsky MJ, Khoruts A. 2013. Microbiota transplantation restores normal fecal bile acid composition in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 306:310–319. doi:.
Not in our library10.1152/ajpgi.00282.2013
- 37.
Fu T, Zhao X, Evans RM. 2016. Liver cancer checks in when bile acid clocks out. Cancer Cell 30:827–828. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ccell.2016.11.012
- 38.
Maria GR, Garcia-Irigoyen O, Moschetta A. 2017. Bile acids and colon cancer: is FXR the solution of the conundrum? Mol Aspects Med 56:66–74. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/j.mam.2017.04.002
- 39.
Sacquet E, Parquet M, Riottot M, Raizman A, Jarrige P, Huguet C, Infante R. 1983. Intestinal absorption, excretion, and biotransformation of hyodeoxycholic acid in man. J Lipid Res 24:604–613. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/s0022-2275(20)37965-7
- 40.
Kawamata Y, Fujii R, Hosoya M, Harada M, Yoshida H, Miwa M, Fukusumi S, Habata Y, Itoh T, Shintani Y, Hinuma S, Fujisawa Y, Fujino M. 2003. A G protein-coupled receptor responsive to bile acids. J Biol Chem 278:9435–40. doi:.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m209706200
Cited by papers we hold 8
- Bile salt hydrolase catalyses formation of amine-conjugated bile acids · 2024No notice
- microbeMASST: a taxonomically informed mass spectrometry search tool for microbial metabolomics data · 2024No notice
- Bile salt hydrolases shape the bile acid landscape and restrict Clostridioides difficile growth in the murine gut · 2023No notice
- Human metabolome variation along the upper intestinal tract · 2023No notice
- Profiling the human intestinal environment under physiological conditions · 2023No notice
- Gut microbiota derived bile acid metabolites maintain the homeostasis of gut and systemic immunity · 2023No notice
- Gut-Microbiota-Derived Metabolites Maintain Gut and Systemic Immune Homeostasis · 2023No notice
- Reverse metabolomics for the discovery of chemical structures from humans · 2023No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.