No to Neocosmospora : Phylogenomic and Practical Reasons for Continued Inclusion of the <named-content content-type="genus-species">Fusarium solani</named-content> Species Complex in the Genus Fusarium
Kerry O’Donnell, Abdullah M. S. Al-Hatmi, Takayuki Aoki and 34 more
mSphere · 2020
doi:10.1128/msphere.00810-20 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
ABSTRACT This article is to alert medical mycologists and infectious disease specialists of recent name changes of medically important species of the filamentous mold Fusarium. Fusarium species can cause localized and life-threating infections in humans. Of the 70 Fusarium species that have been reported to cause infections, close to one-third are members of the Fusarium solani species complex (FSSC), and they collectively account for approximately two-thirds of all reported Fusarium infections. Many of these species were recently given scientific names for the first time by a research group in the Netherlands, but they were misplaced in the genus Neocosmospora. In this paper, we present genetic arguments that strongly support inclusion of the FSSC in Fusarium. There are potentially serious consequences associated with using the name Neocosmospora for Fusarium species because clinicians need to be aware that fusaria are broadly resistant to the spectrum of antifungals that are currently available.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Cited by papers we hold1
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.