No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 19, 2026.
Design of a Broad-Range Bacteriophage Cocktail That Reduces Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms and Treats Acute Infections in Two Animal Models
Francesca Forti, Dwayne R. Roach, Marco Cafora and 8 more
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · 2018 · CC BY
Abstract
The alarming diffusion of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial strains requires investigations on nonantibiotic therapies. Among such therapies, the use of bacteriophages (phages) as antimicrobial agents, namely, phage therapy, is a promising treatment strategy supported by the findings of recent successful compassionate treatments in Europe and the United States. In this work, we combined host range and genomic information to design a 6-phage cocktail killing several clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa , including those collected from Italian cystic fibrosis (CF) patients, and analyzed the cocktail performance. We demonstrated that the cocktail composed of four novel phages (PYO2, DEV, E215 and E217) and two previously characterized phages (PAK_P1 and PAK_P4) was able to lyse P. aeruginosa both in planktonic liquid cultures and in biofilms. In addition, we showed that the phage cocktail could cure acute respiratory infection in mice and treat bacteremia in wax moth ( Galleria mellonella ) larvae. Furthermore, administration of the cocktail to larvae prior to bacterial infection provided prophylaxis. In this regard, the efficiency of the phage cocktail was found to be unaffected by the MDR or mucoid phenotype of the pseudomonal strain. The cocktail was found to be superior to the individual phages in destroying biofilms and providing a faster treatment in mice. We also found the Galleria larva model to be cost-effective for testing the susceptibility of clinical strains to phages, suggesting that it could be implemented in the frame of developing personalized phage therapies.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 19, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
INTRODUCTION
The opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa principally infects the airways of immunocompromised patients and is one of the principal bacteria isolated from adults with cystic fibrosis (CF). The appearance and diffusion of multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates of P. aeruginosa are responsible for the increasingly unsuccessful use of antibiotics. Thus, alternative therapies are urgently needed, and the use of bacteriophages (phages), the natural viral enemies of bacteria, has received renewed attention. Phage therapy was proposed 100 years ago, before the discovery of antibiotics. Following an initial worldwide expansion, the use of this therapy declined, being replaced by the use of antibiotics, which were more successful. Beyond efficacy itself, the lack of precise knowledge of the complex interaction between phages and bacteria has played a major role in the shift from using phages to using antibiotics. For instance, while today genome sequencing and experimentation can determine whether a phage is virulent or temperate, such information was not available in early 20th century. Temperate phages are known to serve as vehicles for bacterial sequence exchanges between strains, eventually leading to the dissemination of genes coding for toxins or antibiotic resistance. Therefore, for therapeutic applications, the use of only virulent (strictly lytic) phages is advised. Compared to antibiotics, phages have several advantages. First, as obligate bacterial viruses, they tend to be specific to their bacterial hosts and their killing activity is confined to a narrow range of pathogenic strains. This avoids collateral damage to human and animal healthy commensal microbiota, contrary to broad-spectrum antibiotics. Another advantage of phage therapy over conventional antibiotics is the dynamic dosing provided by phages, which multiply when the target bacterial host strains are present and decrease in number as the target bacteria are eliminated. Thus, phages provide an infection site-specific augmentation of the dose that cannot be achieved through the standard repeated dosing of antibiotics. Lastly, phages are often able to kill bacteria independently of their MDR phenotype.
Several reports have demonstrated that the growth of a pathogenic bacterium can be controlled in vitro and in vivo with specific phages. These range from the experimental treatment of Escherichia coli diarrhea, Klebsiella pneumoniae pulmonary infection, and Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia to that of P. aeruginosa keratitis. In addition, the therapeutic effect of phage administration on P. aeruginosa-infected mice or Galleria larvae has also been reported. However, no consensual and validated guidelines for the selection of individual or multiple therapeutic phages that target a specific pathogen have been adopted. One strategy is to isolate the causative agent of the bacterial infection from the patient and then identify in vitro one or more phages that lyse that strain(s). This approach is laborious and time-consuming, and it also requires a large pool of phages to be on hand. An alternative strategy would be to preemptively combine a mixture of phages (cocktail) that together are able to efficiently kill a broad range of clinical strains of a disease-specific pathogen.
In this study, we investigated the preemptive tactic, using in vitro and in silico criteria to combine a mixture of phages to efficiently treat a broad range of P. aeruginosa clinical strains isolated from Italian patients with CF. We show that a cocktail of six phages virulent for Pseudomonas can kill with 77% coverage P. aeruginosa clinical strains from CF patients, while it is effective at reducing pseudomonal biofilms in vitro. Furthermore, the phage cocktail resolved pseudomonal acute pneumonia in mice and treated bacteremia in wax moth (Galleria mellonella) larvae.
Isolation and electron microscopy imaging of broad-host-range phages infecting Italian P. aeruginosa strains isolated from cystic fibrosis patients.
We collected 40 P. aeruginosa strains from CF patients at several Italian medical centers (see Materials and Methods). In addition, we added 2 Italian isolates from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 9 non-Italian clinical strains previously isolated from CF and non-CF patients, 5 environmental isolates, and 2 laboratory strains (PAO1 and PAO1 pilA) to increase the genetic diversity of the bacterial hosts tested (see Table S1 in the supplemental material).
Then, we isolated 23 novel phages as described in Materials and Methods (Table S2). Next, we measured the efficiency of plating (EOP) of each phage on the panel of 58 P. aeruginosa strains (Table S3). As expected, each phage had a distinct host range, with no individual phage being able to lyse all strains in the aforementioned collection, and some only lysed less than 30% of strains. Intriguingly, none of our tested phages was able to lyse P. aeruginosa strains PaPh23 and PaPh30. However, about half of the isolated phages exhibited a much broader host range by lysing more than half of the strain collection.
From the pool of moderately broad host range phages, we selected six phages (PYO2, E215, E220, S218, E217, and DEV) that, when combined, were theoretically predicted to infect 97% of the strain collection (Table S3). Transmission electron microscopy images of these phages are shown in Fig. S1. All belong to the order Caudovirales; PYO2, DEV and E220 are members of the Podoviridae family and share a highly similar morphology (a regular icosahedral head of 72 nm in diameter and a short tail of 18 nm); E215 and E217 belong to the Myoviridae family, and both share a very similar morphology with a regular icosahedral head of 80 nm in diameter and a tail 185 nm long; S218 is a member of the Siphoviridae and possesses an icosahedral head of 100 nm in length and 60 nm in width and a flexible 210-nm-long tail.
One-step growth experiments in PAO1 were performed in order to characterize the PYO2, DEV, E215, and E217 phages (Fig. S2). Phages PYO2 and DEV have a similar latent period (20 min) and burst size (100 and 200 PFU/ml, respectively), whereas E215 and E217 show a longer latent period (30 to 40 min), and both have a burst size of over 200 PFU/ml.
Genome characterization of the selected phages.
We sequenced phages PYO2, E215, E220, S218, E217, and DEV, and their genomic characteristics are reported in Table S4. The genomes of both phages PYO2 and DEV were 72,697 bp in length and 99% similar. The alignments showed that the sequences of PYO2 and DEV are related to those of the Podoviridae Lit1virus group and share similar levels of conservation with the publically available sequences of Pseudomonas phages PEV2 and RWG. The genomes of phages E215 (66,789 bp) and E217 (66,291 bp) also had a high level of similarity (97% identity over 98% of their length), are related to the genomes of members of the P1virus subfamily of the Myoviridae, and closely resemble the genome of Pseudomonas phage vB_PaeM_CEB_DP1.
In order to discard temperate phages and, more broadly, phages that could serve as vehicles for undesirable functions, we searched for similarities between all putative viral open reading frames (ORFs) and a custom database of genes expressing bacterial virulence factors, antibiotic resistance, and integrases/excisionases/recombinases. We found that the genomes of phages PYO2, DEV, E215, and E217 do not encode proteins with similarity to undesirable functions, leading us to classify them as virulent. On the contrary, as reported in Table S4, the genomes of phages E220 and S218 contained open reading frames with high levels of similarity to genes annotated as integrases in the ACLAME database. This suggests that phages E220 and S218 have a temperate life cycle not conducive of a desirable antimicrobial agent and thus were not studied further.
Evaluation of in vitro efficiency of transduction of the selected phages.
We tested the capacity of the PYO2, DEV, E215, and E217 phages to transduce genetic markers. We found that the frequency of transduction was less than 10−9 per infecting phage, a frequency that is about 100-fold lower than the typical general transduction rate for virulent phages, leading us to conclude that these phages would unlikely serve as vehicles to carry antibiotic resistance or virulence genes.
Definition of a genetically diverse phage cocktail.
With the aim to assemble a phage cocktail that displays a broad host range and genetic diversity, we selected 6 virulent phages, PYO2, DEV, E215, E217, PAK_P1, and PAK_P4. The last two are previously characterized P. aeruginosa Myoviridae virulent phages isolated in France that are 93,198 bp and 93,147 bp, respectively, and that display 93% identity over 98% of their genome length. PYO2/DEV, E215/E217, and PAK_P1/PAK_P4 constitute three groups of genomically similar phages and represent three viral genera. The six phages do not show significant sequence similarity to each other, other than the sequence similarity between the pairs of closely related phages (Fig. S4 and Table S4). Here, we refer to the mixture of all six phages as the “phage cocktail.”
In vitro characterization of the cocktail and its individual components.
The EOP of the cocktail was compared to that of each individual phage on 58 P. aeruginosa strains and is reported in Table 1. As was to be expected, the phage cocktail was able to lyse a range of bacterial strains broader than the range that any of the individual phages that made up the cocktail could lyse. That is, a single phage with the broadest host range lysed only 36 of the 58 strains in the full strain collection (62%) and 22 of the 40 Italian CF clinical strains (55%), whereas combining the phages in a cocktail expanded the host range of the full strain collection lysed by 15% (45 out of 58 strains) and the host range of the Italian CF clinical strain collection lysed by 20% (30 out of 40 strains). Of note, the host range of the phage cocktail in vitro was lower than that predicted theoretically from summing the host range of each individual phage within the cocktail. This phenomenon could be due to host infection competition between phages.
The lysis kinetics of P. aeruginosa strain PAO1 and PAK-lumi cultures infected with each phage and with the cocktail were followed by monitoring the optical density (OD) at 600 nm (OD600) over time (Fig. 1A to C). For PAO1, at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 2.5, PYO2 and DEV caused a decrease in the OD600 at 1 to 1.5 h postinfection (p.i.) and E215 caused a relatively smaller decrease at about 2 h. For PAK-lumi, the effect was less pronounced both after DEV infection and after E215 infection. Interestingly, phage E217 did not cause lysis but clearly stopped the growth of both PAO1 and PAK-lumi. PAK_P1 and PAK_P4 did not alter PAO1 growth, whereas the OD600 of PAK-lumi started to decrease at 2 h p.i.
After infection of both the PAO1 and PAK-lumi cultures with the phage cocktail (Fig. 2C), the OD600 decreased at about 70 min p.i. This indicates that the phages were able to kill sensitive bacteria in vitro in a relatively short time after infection. After overnight incubation, however, the OD600 reached high values, due to the growth of resistant bacteria, as confirmed by testing several bacteria (10/10 resistant clones), indicating that the cocktail failed to prevent the outgrowth of phage-resistant variants.
Phages disrupt P. aeruginosa biofilm.
We tested the capability of phages to reduce the biofilms formed by green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing P. aeruginosa PAO1 or PAK-lumi strains. After 48 h of biofilm formation on glass slides, the phages were applied as a cocktail (Fig. 2A) or individually (Fig. S3). The biofilm biomass nearly disappeared after incubation with the phage cocktail. To quantify the biofilm reduction, we measured the biofilm biomass by crystal violet staining of 24-h biofilms and found that the cocktail caused a significant reduction in the PAO1 and PAK-lumi biofilm biomass (63% and 65%, respectively; Fig. 2B). In addition, the efficiency of the cocktail in destroying a preformed biofilm formed by various clinical P. aeruginosa strains was also tested. The cocktail reduced 64% (P < 0.001) of a highly dense biofilm produced by strain PaPh5 used in the first infection and reduced the biomasses of the mucoid AA43 strain and the mucoid MDR PaPh32 strain by 19% (P = 0.6) and 37% (P < 0.001), respectively.
Intriguingly, PAK_P1 and PAK_P4, which are unable to replicate on PAO1, caused a significant increase in the PAO1 biofilm biomass (Fig. S3). This effect was not observed when the phages were components of the cocktail. Although the cause of this phenomenon is unclear, it could be related to the host defense system to reduce phage growth.
Phage treatment of P. aeruginosa respiratory infection in mice.
We tested the capacity of the phage cocktail to cure a P. aeruginosa acute respiratory infection in a mouse model. Figure 3 shows that phage treatment even at the lowest MOI (an MOI of 0.05 for each phage) was effective at reducing the respiratory bacterial burden by 48 h and achieving a 100% survival rate. Noninvasive longitudinal monitoring of P. aeruginosa infection showed that the phage cocktail administered at each of the MOIs tested led to a reduction of the bacterial burden in the mouse lungs (Fig. 3B). In comparison, administration of the phage cocktail at the highest MOI (1.0) began to reduce significantly the bacterial density by 6 h posttreatment, whereas with administration at the two lower MOIs (0.05 and 0.1), it took up to 9 h before the reduction became significant.
Phage treatment of P. aeruginosa systemic infection of G. mellonella larvae.
In the frame of developing personalized phage therapies before the treatment of patients, we investigated the effects of the phages on P. aeruginosa clinical isolates in wax moth (G. mellonella) larvae as a rapid and economical screening method. First, we assessed that administration of the phage cocktail at the higher dose of an MOI of 25 (CK25) did not per se cause adverse effects on the larvae (Fig. 4A and B). Then, we showed that death was significantly delayed in larvae infected with a lethal dose of PAK-lumi and treated 1 h later with the phage cocktail (Fig. 4A). Indeed, the rate of survival of the larvae after 20 h increased from about 17% to 49% by treatment with the cocktail at an MOI of 8 (CK8) and to 63% by treatment with the cocktail at an MOI of 25 (CK25) (Fig. 4E). Even at a later time point (40 h), the rate of survival increased from 6.6% of larvae not treated with phages to 26.6% and 30.5% (Mantel-Cox test, P < 0.0001) of the groups that received the phage cocktail at the different MOIs (Fig. 4A). Moreover, we showed that pretreatment with the phage cocktail 1 h before PAK-lumi challenge provided prophylaxis against lethal infection (Mantel-Cox test, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 4B and E). Interestingly, both of the two clinical strains PaPh5 and AA43 were also controlled by the phage cocktail (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 4C to E).
DISCUSSION
CF patients, who experience pulmonary infections predominantly caused by P. aeruginosa, are increasingly exposed to the risk of infection caused by MDR strains due to the recurrent use of antibiotics. In this study, we isolated and characterized new phages, assembled a 6-phage cocktail, and tested its efficacy against MDR P. aeruginosa strains both in vitro and in two in vivo animal models.
Several studies have reported the successful treatment of experimental bacterial infections with phages, supporting their use as first-line therapy, in particular, for infections caused by MDR pathogens. In line with these data, two compassionate phage treatments were recently reported in Europe and the United States, confirming the efficacy and safety of such an approach. However, for these two examples, the choice of phages was guided, first, by their in vitro activity against the patient's pathogen without, to our knowledge, any in vivo validation step. In addition to such a customized solution, a parallel strategy would be to design ready-to-use cocktails with a broad host range. Here, we assembled a 6-phage cocktail, taking into account the host range and genomic information for phages, and assessed its in vitro and in vivo efficacies.
The cocktail is made up of 3 pairs of closely related phages, as revealed by genome sequencing (with divergences of less than 8% sequence identity between the components of each pair). Although the pairs have highly similar genomes, the related phages differ in their host range in vitro, which is part of the rationale for the construction of the cocktail. For example, phage DEV lyses strain LESB58, whereas the closely related phage PYO2 does not. The nucleotide sequences of these two phages, however, differ by less than 1% over their complete genomes. We noticed that the genomic variation is mainly confined to two genes: the 3′-end region of the RNA polymerase gene (orf71 in Fig. S4B in the supplemental material), in which most substitutions observed were synonymous, and the ORF encoding dUTPase (orf81 in Fig. S4B), in which 21/128 amino acids (16%) differed. dUTPase has been reported to be essential for viral replication in certain hosts and implicated in the host range under specific conditions. Our observations suggest that dUTPase genes can be considered attractive candidate genes, beyond the expected structural genes involved in host recognition, for future studies of host specificity mechanisms.
Compared to the host spectrum of the individual phages, our cocktail had in vitro a broader host spectrum for clinically isolated P. aeruginosa strains. In addition, the cocktail lysed all 3 MDR strains in our collection (strains PaPh24, PaPh25, and PaPh32), implying that phage infection was independent of cells harboring an antibiotic resistance mechanism. Moreover, the phage cocktail was able to infect and kill mucoid strains isolated from chronically infected CF patients.
Treatment of a P. aeruginosa biofilm with the phage cocktail demonstrated that phages are able to enter the biofilm, destroying the biomass and reaching the bacteria embedded inside. In this respect, the use of the phage cocktail greatly increased the effect of single-phage infections (compare Fig. 2 with Fig. S3). We also observed that the phage cocktail reduced to different degrees the biofilms formed by different strains, which may have been due to the differences in biofilm formation and the biofilm composition observed with clinical P. aeruginosa strains.
Our findings indicate that in mice, lethal acute respiratory infection can be cured by treatment with the cocktail. Compared to our previous data obtained with a single phage, the cocktail showed the advantage of having more rapid efficacy in reducing the bacterial load. This suggests a synergistic action when using multiple phages. Further investigations will be required to identify the mechanisms behind such synergy, but in the light of the findings of our recent investigations on the role of the immune system during monophage therapy, we can hypothesize that the cocktail reduces the probability that phage-resistant bacteria will grow. In systemic G. mellonella infection, in which bacteria were directly injected in the hemolymph, a significant delay in the time to death over that for the nontreated controls was observed upon phage injection. The presence of a significant difference in lethality between untreated and phage-treated larvae at an early time point after infection (20 h) suggests that this test could be introduced for in vivo evaluation of the effectiveness of phage therapy. Moreover, the phage cocktail was able to prevent P. aeruginosa infection in the larvae. Prophylaxis with phages could be proposed for CF or immunocompromised patients, who are frequently hospitalized and therefore at higher risk of exposure to nosocomial infections. The use of the larva model provided several advantages over the use of the murine model, among which was the flexibility to test many clinical strains, as shown here. Indeed, some P. aeruginosa clinical strains have been found not to infect the respiratory tract of mice (; unpublished data), which limits the use of this model. Other advantages are related to the cost, the easy management in a microbiology lab, and to some extent, the experimental time. These characteristics of the larva model provide a solution for the in vivo evaluation of the activities of phages and cocktails against a clinical isolate that could be integrated into the process of selection of the phages best suited for use in the formulation of a cocktail.
Overall, our strategy, based on (i) host range, (ii) genomic information, and (iii) in vitro efficacies, led to the formulation of a 6-phage cocktail that was validated in two in vivo models. It should be noticed that the in vitro efficacies in liquid cultures and biofilms were the less encouraging data, as the cocktail did not prevent within 24 h the growth of bacterial resistant clones, and some individual phages enhanced the density of biofilms. Therefore, to design phage cocktails, the pertinence of in vitro tests under conditions irrelevant to the treatment of human bacterial infections can be questioned, despite its rationale being at the root of phage therapy.
P. aeruginosa strains.
Clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa were isolated from primary and chronically infected patients at the Centro di Riferimento per la Fibrosi Cistica della Regione Lombardia, Milan, Italy, and at the Ospedale Bambino Gesù, Rome, Italy, and kindly provided by A. Bragonzi of the Infection and Cystic Fibrosis Unit at San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. Strain PAO1 pilA, in which the pilA gene has been deleted, was kindly provided by F. Imperi (Università degli Studi di Roma-Sapienza, Rome, Italy). The other strains were present in the lab collection. All the strains are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material. Strains PAO1 and PAK-lumi were transformed with plasmid tPUCP19-GFP (C. Penaranda and D. Hung, personal communication), which expresses high levels of GFP to make them fluorescent, and strain PAO1Tcr was used for transduction experiments.
Bacteriophage isolation.
Our phage collection includes 25 independent isolates, listed in Table S2. Several isolates originated from sewage samples collected from the Milano Nosedo and Milano Peschiera Borromeo wastewater treatment plants. Independent samples collected on different days were used to avoid the reisolation of the same phage. Clear plaques were purified by standard procedures. Two phages were isolated from the commercial preparations Phagyo (batch number 06.06.13; JSC Biochimpharm, Tbilisi, Georgia) and Intesti Bacteriophage (batch number M2-501; Eliava Institute, Tbilisi, Georgia) by plating the preparation on PAO1 and isolating a single clear plaque from each preparation. Several natural derivatives of these two initial isolates with different plaque morphologies or host ranges were added to the collection. On a few occasions, the evolution of some phage variants was performed, as indicated previously, in which an exponential-phase culture of a specific strain was infected with a phage and infection was continued for 24 h; then, the culture was centrifuged and the supernatant was used to reinoculate a fresh bacterial culture. This procedure was repeated daily for 6 days. The EOP of the evolved phage present after 6 days was compared to the EOP of the ancestral phage used as the inoculum. If the EOP was improved, the phage was added to the collection. Despite several attempts, no phage able to infect strains PaPh23 and PaPh30 was isolated.
High-titer phage stock preparations.
High-titer preparations of the phages were obtained by infection of 500 ml of liquid culture of PAO1 or PAK-lumi, as described in reference, with the following modifications: the lysates were filtered through 1.2-μm-pore-diameter filters and incubated for 30 min at 37°C with DNase (1 μg/ml) and RNase (1 μg/ml) before precipitation with polyethylene glycol. For in vivo experiments, phage lysates were purified by cesium chloride ultracentrifugation, as described in reference, and dialyzed against TN buffer (10 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7). Then, each phage preparation was passed through an endotoxin removal column (EndoTrap HD; Hyglos, Germany) before measuring the endotoxin level by Limulus amoebocyte lysate chromogenic endotoxin quantitation (Pierce). The levels of endotoxins of the phage preparations were below the limit value recommended for intravenous administration (5.0 international units/kg body mass/hour; http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/pharmacopoeia/Bacterial-endotoxins_QAS11-452_FINAL_July12.pdf).
Plating efficiency.
The plating efficiency of the isolated phages on clinical strains of P. aeruginosa was determined according to standard protocols: 5 μl of serial dilutions of a phage preparation was spotted on agar plates on which a specific bacterial host was spread. The number of plaques observed after overnight incubation was compared to that obtained on strain PAO1 or PAK-lumi.
In vitro infection.
For determining the lysis kinetics of infected cultures, a culture of strain PAO1 or PAK-lumi in LD broth at 37°C with shaking was infected with each phage at an OD600 of 0.1 or with the 6-phage cocktail at an MOI of 2.5, and the OD of the culture was followed.
Sequencing and assembly of phage genome sequences and their screening for the presence of potential undesirable gene products.
Genomic DNA extracted from purified high-titer phage preparations was subjected to standard Illumina library preparation protocols and sequenced on an Illumina Mi-Seq instrument at the CNR IBBIOM Institute in Bari, Italy, to generate paired-end (2 × 250 nucleotides) sequence reads. Raw paired-end sequence data were subjected to stringent quality trimming and removal of library adapters using Trimmomatic software and assembled using the SPAdes (v3.7.1) program and k-mer lengths of 75, 97, and 119.
Each genome was assembled as a single contig and deposited in GenBank. BLAST similarity searches of the complete genome sequences against the sequences in GenBank recovered high levels of identity and contiguity with previously sequenced genomes and allowed taxonomic assignment of each isolate (Table S4). An in-house database of undesirable genes was constructed by merging entries from the ACLAME database of mobile elements whose descriptions contained any of the terms “integrase,” “excisionase,” “recombinase,” or “repressor” with those from the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) and the Virulence Factor Database (VFDB). All ORFs with the ATG, GTG, or TTG start codon were inferred from viral genome sequences using a custom Python script and used as queries for BLASTX searches (E value cutoff, 5e−04) against the undesirable gene database.
Transduction assay.
Phages were tested for their ability to transduce the tetracycline resistance (Tcr) marker from PAO1Tcr into wild-type PAO1. An aliquot (100 μl) of a high-titer lysate (>1 × 1010 PFU/ml) obtained in PAO1TcR was used to infect a 10-ml overnight culture of the recipient strain PAO1. After static incubation at room temperature for 30 min to allow phage adsorption, the tubes were transferred to 37°C for 20 min, the cells were centrifuged, and the pelleted cells were resuspended in 300 μl LB. Aliquots (150 μl) of the cell mixture were spread onto two agar plates containing tetracycline (100 μl/ml). The frequency of transduction was calculated as the ratio of Tcr colony transductants to the adsorbed phage.
Composition of the phage cocktail.
Four newly isolated Pseudomonas phages that presented different and complementary host ranges were selected as constituents of the phage cocktail. The four newly isolated phages were named, according to a recent proposal for a rational scheme for the nomenclature of viruses, vB_PaeP_PYO2, vB_PaeP_DEV, vB_PaeM_E215, and vB_PaeM_E217, abbreviated in this paper PYO2, DEV, E215, and E217, respectively.
To these, phages PAK_P1 and PAK_P4, previously characterized for their therapeutic efficacies in mouse infections, were added; both are Myoviridae, have a head diameter of 80 nm and a tail of about 130 nm, and share no homologies with the other 4 phages in the cocktail. Their genome sequences (GenBank accession number NC_015294 and KC862300, respectively) are 93,198 bp and 93,147 bp, respectively, with 93% identity.
Our final cocktail included these 6 phages: PYO2, DEV, E215, E217, PAK_P1, and PAK_P4. The cocktail was composed of phages mixed at the same number of PFU per milliliter, and the cocktail was prepared immediately before each experiment to ensure accurate phage titers.
Biofilm disruption.
Two methods were used to monitor biofilm disruption: fluorescence microscopy and crystal violet staining. For better visualization of the biofilms, we used either the PAK-lumi or PAO1 strain transformed with plasmid tPUCP19-GFP, which expresses a high level of GFP. Biofilms of PAK gfp and PAO1 gfp were grown in an 8-well chamber microscope slide (Nunc Lab-Tek chamber slide) for 48 h in 200 μl LD broth at 37°C. Every 24 h the supernatant was gently removed and replaced by fresh LD broth. After 48 h, phages at 1 × 108 PFU/ml were added and incubation at 37°C was continued for 4 h. The supernatant containing the planktonic cells was removed, and the slide was gently washed and examined with a Leica DMRB microscope equipped with standard fluorescence filters using a 100× objective. Images were acquired with a charge-coupled-device video camera (Leica DCF 480).
For biofilm evaluation by crystal violet staining, an overnight culture of either P. aeruginosa PAO1 or a clinical isolate was diluted to an OD600 of about 0.02 in LD broth, and 100 μl was inoculated into 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h to allow biofilm formation. Broth containing planktonic cells was gently removed, the wells were washed with 200 μl of LD, 120 μl of LD containing phage lysate at 108 PFU/ml was added, and incubation was continued for 4 h. After incubation, the wells were carefully emptied and gently washed with H2O. The bacteria adhering to the walls of the plate were stained with 150 μl of 0.1% crystal violet solution in H2O for 20 min. After washing with tap water, the dye was eluted from the adherent biofilm with 150 μl 5% SDS and quantified by measuring the optical density of a 10-fold dilution of the eluate at 600 nm. Each treatment was repeated in 18 wells, and the median value and standard deviation (SD) were calculated.
Animals and ethics.
Mice were housed under pathogen-free conditions with ad libitum access to food and water. Animal experiments were conducted in accordance with European directives on animal protection and welfare and were approved by the French Ministry of Education and Research (reference number 2015-0041) and the Institut Pasteur (reference number 10.565).
Mouse acute respiratory infection.
Female BALB/c mice between 8 and 12 weeks of age were anesthetized with 100 mg/kg ketamine and 10 mg/kg xylazine. Subsequently, the animals were intranasally infected with 1 × 107 CFU mid-log-phase P. aeruginosa PAK-lumi suspended in 30 μl phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). After 2 h postinfection (p.i.), mice whose lungs were infected were treated intranasally with the 6-phage cocktail at the indicated PFU dose suspended in 30 μl PBS. An IVIS Spectrum 100 in vivo imaging system (PerkinElmer) was used to facilitate noninvasive longitudinal monitoring of P. aeruginosa infection in live individual animals in real time, performed as previously described.
Systemic infection of Galleria mellonella larvae.
A PAK-lumi culture was grown to an OD600 of 0.5 in LD broth at 37°C with shaking, pelleted, and diluted to an OD of 1 in physiological solution, equivalent to 1 × 109 CFU/ml. After appropriate dilution, 10 μl of inoculum, containing about 30 cells of P. aeruginosa PAK-lumi, was delivered into the larva hemolymph behind the last proleg. A phage suspension, consisting of 10 μl containing the 6-phage cocktail at 1,500 or 4,500 PFU, was delivered behind the last proleg on the opposite site at 1 h p.i. For prophylaxis experiments, the larvae were infected with the phages 1 h before they were infected with the bacteria. All experiments used 15 or 20 larvae. A positive-control group (larvae infected and treated with physiological solution) and two negative-control groups (one group injected with physiological solution only and one group injected with the phage suspension only to assess the toxicity of the phage cocktail) were also included. The larvae were placed into petri dishes and incubated at 37°C in the dark. The survival of the larvae was followed hourly after 16 h p.i.; the larvae were recorded as dead when they did not move in response to touch.
Phage treatment of larvae infected with clinical P. aeruginosa strains was performed after determination of the lethal dose of bacteria of each strain, equal to 110 and 30 CFU/larva for the AA43 and PaPh5 strains, respectively. At 1 h after injection of the bacteria into the larvae, a fixed dose of phage cocktail (4,500 PFU/larva) was injected.
Statistical analysis.
Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Tukey test or the chi-square test with the Yates correction. P values for Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated by the Mantel-Cox test. Statistical analysis was done using GraphPad software (http://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/).
Accession number(s).
The GenBank accession numbers for the phages are MF490236 for vB_PaeP_PYO2, MF490238 for vB_PaeP_DEV, MF490241 for vB_PaeM_E215, MF490240 for vB_PaeM_E217, MF490237 for vB_PaeP_E220, and MF490239 for vB_PaeS_S218.
References 50
- 1.
Loc-Carrillo C, Abedon S 2011 Pros and cons of phage therapy. Bacteriophage 1:111–114. doi:.
Not in our library10.4161/bact.1.2.14590
- 2.
Roach DR, Debarbieux L 2017 Phage therapy: awakening a sleeping giant. Emerg Top Life Sci 1:93–103. doi:.
Not in our library10.1042/etls20170002
- 3.
D'Herelle F 2017 On an invisible microbe antagonistic to dysenteric bacilli. C R Acad Sci 165:373–375.
Not in our library10.1016/j.resmic.2007.07.005
- 4.
Chibani-Chennoufi S, Bruttin A, Brüssow H, Dillmann M, Bru H 2004 Phage-host interaction: an ecological perspective. J Bacteriol 186:3677–3686. doi:.
Not in our library10.1128/jb.186.12.3677-3686.2004
- 5.
Bruttin A, Brüssow H, Bru H 2005 Human volunteers receiving Escherichia coli phage T4 orally: a safety test of phage therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:2874–2878. doi:.
Not in our library10.1128/aac.49.7.2874-2878.2005
- 6.
Dufour N, Debarbieux L, Fromentin M, Ricard JD 2015 Treatment of highly virulent extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli pneumonia with bacteriophages. Crit Care Med 43:e190–e198. doi:.
Not in our library10.1097/ccm.0000000000000968
- 7.
Chattopadhyay MK, Chakraborty R, Grossart H-P, Reddy GS, Jagannadham MV 2015 Antibiotic resistance of bacteria. Biomed Res Int 2015:1–2. doi:.
Not in our library10.1155/2015/501658
- 8.
Labrie SJ, Samson JE, Moineau S 2010 Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:317–327. doi:.
Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro2315
- 9.
Denou E, Bruttin A, Barretto C, Ngom-Bru C, Brüssow H, Zuber S 2009 T4 phages against Escherichia coli diarrhea: potential and problems. Virology 388:21–30. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/j.virol.2009.03.009
- 10.
Cao F, Wang X, Wang L, Li Z, Che J, Wang L, Li X, Cao Z, Zhang J, Jin L, Xu Y 2015 Evaluation of the efficacy of a bacteriophage in the treatment of pneumonia induced by multidrug resistance Klebsiella pneumoniae in mice. Biomed Res Int 2015:752930. doi:.
Not in our library10.1155/2015/752930
- 11.
Wang Y, Mi Z, Niu W, An X, Yuan X, Liu H, Li P, Liu Y, Feng Y, Huang Y, Zhang X, Zhang Z, Fan H, Peng F, Tong Y, Bai C 2016 Intranasal treatment with bacteriophage rescues mice from Acinetobacter baumannii-mediated pneumonia. Future Microbiol 11:631–641. doi:.
Not in our library10.2217/fmb.16.11
- 12.
- 13.
Debarbieux L, Leduc D, Maura D, Morello E, Criscuolo A, Grossi O, Balloy V, Touqui L 2010 Bacteriophages can treat and prevent Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infections. J Infect Dis 201:1096–1104. doi:.
Not in our library10.1086/651135
- 14.
Alemayehu D, Casey PG, McAuliffe O 2012 Bacteriophages ϕMR299-2 and ϕNH-4 can eliminate Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the murine lung and on cystic fibrosis lung airway. mBio 3:e00029-12. doi:.
Not in our library10.1128/mbio.00029-12
- 15.
Roach DR, Leung CY, Henry M, Morello E, Singh D, Di Santo JP, Weitz JS, Debarbieux L 2017 Synergy between the host immune system and bacteriophage is essential for successful phage therapy against an acute respiratory pathogen. Cell Host Microbe 22:38–47. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/j.chom.2017.06.018
- 16.
Olszak T, Zarnowiec P, Kaca W, Danis-Wlodarczyk K, Augustyniak D, Drevinek P, de Soyza A, McClean S, Drulis-Kawa Z 2015 In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity of environmental bacteriophages against Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from cystic fibrosis patients. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:6021–6033. doi:.
Not in our library10.1007/s00253-015-6492-6
- 17.
Gill JJ, Hyman P 2010 Phage choice, isolation, and preparation for phage therapy. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 11:2–14. doi:.
Not in our library10.2174/138920110790725311
- 18.
Pirnay JP, De Vos D, Verbeken G, Merabishvili M, Chanishvili N, Vaneechoutte M, Zizi M, Laire G, Lavigne R, Huys I, Van den Mooter G, Buckling A, Debarbieux L, Pouillot F, Azeredo J, Kutter E, Dublanchet A, Górski A, Adamia R 2011 The phage therapy paradigm: prêt-à-porter or sur-mesure? Pharm Res 28:934–937. doi:.
Not in our library10.1007/s11095-010-0313-5
- 19.
Leplae R, Lima-Mendez G, Toussaint A 2010 ACLAME: a classification of mobile genetic elements, update 2010. Nucleic Acids Res 38:D57–D61. doi:.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkp938
- 20.
Holloway BW, Krishnapillai V, Morgan AF 1979 Chromosomal genetics of Pseudomonas. Microbiol Rev 43:73–102.
Not in our library10.1128/mr.43.1.73-102.1979
- 21.
Henry M, Lavigne R, Debarbieux L 2013 Predicting in vivo efficacy of therapeutic bacteriophages used to treat pulmonary infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:5961–5968. doi:.
Not in our library10.1128/aac.01596-13
- 22.
Henry M, Bobay LM, Chevallereau A, Saussereau E, Ceyssens PJ, Debarbieux L 2015 The search for therapeutic bacteriophages uncovers one new subfamily and two new genera of Pseudomonas-infecting Myoviridae. PLoS One 10:e0117163. doi:.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0117163
- 23.
Goodridge LD 2010 Designing phage therapeutics. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 11:15–27. doi:.
Not in our library10.2174/138920110790725348
- 24.
Hall AR, De Vos D, Friman VP, Pirnay JP, Buckling A 2012 Effects of sequential and simultaneous applications of bacteriophages on populations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro and in wax moth larvae. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:5646–5652. doi:.
Not in our library10.1128/aem.00757-12
- 25.
Lacqua A, Wanner O, Colangelo T, Martinotti MG, Landini P 2006 Emergence of biofilm-forming subpopulations upon exposure of Escherichia coli to environmental bacteriophages. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:956–959. doi:.
Not in our library10.1128/aem.72.1.956-959.2006
- 26.
Lin DM, Koskella B, Lin HC 2017 Phage therapy: an alternative to antibiotics in the age of multi-drug resistance. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 8:162–173. doi:.
Not in our library10.4292/wjgpt.v8.i3.162
- 27.
Abedon ST, Kuhl SJ, Blasdel BG, Kutter EM 2011 Phage treatment of human infections. Bacteriophage 1:66–85. doi:.
Not in our library10.4161/bact.1.2.15845
- 28.
Chan BK, Abedon ST, Loc-Carrillo C 2013 Phage cocktails and the future of phage therapy. Future Microbiol 8:769–783. doi:.
Not in our library10.2217/fmb.13.47
- 29.
Cooper CJ, Mirzaei MK, Nilsson AS 2016 Adapting drug approval pathways for bacteriophage-based therapeutics. Front Microbiol 7:1209. doi:.
Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2016.01209
- 30.
- 31.
Schooley RT, Biswas B, Gill JJ, Hernandez-Morales A, Lancaster J, Lessor L, Barr JJ, Reed SL, Rohwer F, Benler S, Segall AM, Taplitz R, Smith DM, Kerr K, Kumaraswamy M, Nizet V, Lin L, McCauley MD, Strathdee SA, Benson CA, Pope RK, Leroux BM, Picel AC, Mateczun AJ, Cilwa KE, Regeimbal JM, Estrella LA, Wolfe DM, Henry MS, Quinones J, Salka S, Bishop-Lilly KA, Young R, Hamilton T 2017 Development and use of personalized bacteriophage-based therapeutic cocktails to treat a patient with a disseminated resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00954-17. doi:.
Not in our library10.1128/aac.00954-17
- 32.
Hizi A, Herzig E 2015 dUTPase: the frequently overlooked enzyme encoded by many retroviruses. Retrovirology 12:70. doi:.
Not in our library10.1186/s12977-015-0198-9
- 33.
Warner HR, Thompson RB, Mozer TJ, Duncan BK 1979 The properties of a bacteriophage T5 mutant unable to induce deoxyuridine 5′-triphosphate nucleotidohydrolase. Synthesis of uracil-containing T5 deoxyribonucleic acid. J Biol Chem 254:7534–7539.
Not in our library
- 34.
Rakhuba DV, Kolomiets EI, Dey ES, Novik GI 2010 Bacteriophage receptors, mechanisms of phage adsorption and penetration into host cell. Pol J Microbiol 59:145–155.
Not in our library
- 35.
Head NE, Yu H 2004 Cross-sectional analysis of clinical and environmental isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: biofilm formation, virulence, and genome diversity. Infect Immun 72:133–144. doi:.
Not in our library10.1128/iai.72.1.133-144.2004
- 36.
Dufour N, Clermont O, La Combe B, Messika J, Dion S, Khanna V, Denamur E, Ricard JD, Debarbieux L, Eveillard M, Kouatchet A, Lasocki S, Asfar P, Billard-Pomares T, Magdoud F, Barnaud G, Corvec S, Lakhal K, Armand L, Wolff M, Bourdon S, Reignier J, Martin S, Fihman V, Deprost N, Bador J, Charles PE, Goret J, Boyer A, Wallet F, Jaillette E, Nseir S, Landraud L, Ruimy R, Danin PE, Dellamonica J, Cremniter J, Frat JP, Jauréguy F, Clec'h C, Decré D, Maury E 2016 Bacteriophage LM33_P1, a fast-acting weapon against the pandemic ST131-O25b:H4 Escherichia coli clonal complex. J Antimicrob Chemother 71:3072–3080. doi:.
Not in our library10.1093/jac/dkw253
- 37.
Merabishvili M, Pirnay JP, De Vos D 2018 Guidelines to compose an ideal bacteriophage cocktail. Methods Mol Biol 1693:99–110. doi:.
Not in our library10.1007/978-1-4939-7395-8_9
- 38.
Minandri F, Imperi F, Frangipani E, Bonchi C, Visaggio D, Facchini M, Pasquali P, Bragonzi A, Visca P 2016 Role of iron uptake systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence and airway infection. Infect Immun 84:2324–2335. doi:.
Not in our library10.1128/iai.00098-16
- 39.
Adams M 1959 Bacteriophages. Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, NY.
Not in our library
- 40.
Betts A, Vasse M, Kaltz O, Hochberg ME 2013 Back to the future: evolving bacteriophages to increase their effectiveness against the pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Evol Appl 6:1054–1063. doi:.
Not in our library10.1111/eva.12085
Cited by papers we hold 13
- Systematic bacteriophage selection for the lysis of multiple Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains · 2025Not checked
- Therapeutic Optimization of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> Phages: From Isolation to Directed Evolution · 2025Not checked
- Pathogenesis of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm: A Review · 2022No notice
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa: pathogenesis, virulence factors, antibiotic resistance, interaction with host, technology advances and emerging therapeutics · 2022No notice
- Heterogenous Susceptibility to R-Pyocins in Populations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Sourced from Cystic Fibrosis Lungs · 2021Not checked
- Phages for Biofilm Removal · 2020No notice
- Development of a Bacteriophage Cocktail to Constrain the Emergence of Phage-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa · 2020No notice
- Bacteriophage therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms: a review · 2020No notice
- Five rules for resistance management in the antibiotic apocalypse, a road map for integrated microbial management · 2019Not checked
- Galleria mellonella as a consolidated in vivo model hosts: New developments in antibacterial strategies and novel drug testing · 2019No notice
- Phage therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in a cystic fibrosis zebrafish model · 2019No notice
- Efficacy of bacteriophage treatment against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Galleria mellonella larvae and a mouse model of acute pneumonia · 2019No notice
- Bacteriophage Therapy: Clinical Trials and Regulatory Hurdles · 2018No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.