No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.
The Microbiology of Bloodstream Infection: 20-Year Trends from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program
Daniel J. Diekema, Po-Ren Hsueh, Rodrigo E. Mendes and 4 more (opens in a new tab)
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · 2019 · CC BY
doi:10.1128/aac.00355-19 (opens in a new tab)
Abstract
Bloodstream infection (BSI) organisms were consecutively collected from >200 medical centers in 45 nations between 1997 and 2016. Species identification and susceptibility testing followed Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methods at a central laboratory.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 17, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
INTRODUCTION
Bloodstream infection (BSI) causes significant patient morbidity and mortality worldwide. Changing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) rates, pathogen distribution, demographics, and medical care delivery all may affect the epidemiology of BSI; therefore, continuously monitoring trends in the microbiology of BSI pathogens worldwide is very important. Examining microbiological trends can help inform diagnostic approaches, treatment strategies, and prevention programs.
A major concern has been the emergence and global spread of multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms, including oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ORSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. (VRE), and MDR Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) (including extended-spectrum-β-lactamase [ESBL] producers), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), and MDR nonfermenters such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. Several studies have demonstrated the high mortality attributable to BSI due to these MDR organisms.
The SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program was established in 1997 to monitor the predominant bacterial pathogens and the antimicrobial resistance patterns of organisms isolated from patients with various infection types, including BSI. We now report trends in organism distribution and AMR among BSI isolates submitted to the SENTRY Program during the first 20 years of the program (1997 to 2016).
RESULTS
Among the 264,901 BSI isolates collected, the most common pathogens overall were S. aureus and Escherichia coli (together accounting for over 40% of BSIs), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and Enterococcus faecalis (see Table 1). Notably, the number of E. coli isolates increased (from 18.7% in 1997 to 2000, to 24.0% in 2013 to 2016) whereas the number of S. aureus isolates declined (from 22.5% to 18.7%), as an overall proportion of all BSI. This change was accompanied by an increase in the proportion of GNB among the top 10 pathogens causing BSI (from 33.5% to 43.4% between the years 1997 to 2000 and the years 2013 to 2016). The proportion of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates declined from 4.2% of all BSI in 1997 to 2000 to less than 2.0% of all BSI in 2009 to 2016.
Pathogen frequency varied somewhat over time and by region, hospital-onset (HO) or community-onset (CO) status, and age (see Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4). However, S. aureus and E. coli remained predominant, with S. aureus representing a larger proportion of BSIs in North and Latin America (24.5% and 20.1% overall, respectively), while E. coli was predominant in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region (24.1% and 26.0% overall, respectively). Major decreases in the frequency of S. aureus detection occurred in Latin America (from 21.5% in 1997 to 2000 to 16.4% in 2013 to 2016) and the Asia-Pacific region (from 20.8% to 13.9%; Table 2). S. pneumoniae frequency decreased during the study period, especially in Latin America (from 4.0% in 1997 to 2000 to 0.4% in 2013 to 2016) and the Asia-Pacific region (from 4.6% to 0.9%). In contrast, E. coli and K. pneumoniae frequencies increased in all regions, with the greatest increases in Europe and the Asia-Pacific regions (Table 2). Acinetobacter spp. represented higher proportions of BSI in Latin America and the Asia-Pacific regions (4.4% and 3.2% overall, respectively) than elsewhere.
While E. coli and S. aureus were the two most common causes of BSI in both HO-BSI and CO-BSI, they were much more predominant for CO-BSI (57.8% versus 31.3% for HO-BSI). HO-BSI was more often due to non-E. coli GNB (P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp.; Table 4).
The prevalence of ORSA increased until 2005 to 2008 and then declined in all regions and among HO-BSI and CO-BSI (Fig. 1). Of the 56,575 S. aureus BSI isolates tested against vancomycin, only 1 had a vancomycin MIC in the CLSI nonsusceptible category (8 mg/liter), and no trend toward an increase in the vancomycin MIC over time (“MIC creep”) was detected. The proportion of VRE (vancomycin MIC, >4 mg/liter) declined after 2012 and was 16.4% overall (see Fig. 2). Daptomycin resistance among S. aureus and enterococci remained rare (<0.1%).
The frequency of MDR Enterobacteriaceae among all Enterobacteriaceae isolates increased from 6.2% in 1997 to 2000 to 15.8% in 2013 to 2016 and was highest among the HO-BSI isolates (Fig. 3). The frequency of MDR among Enterobacteriaceae varied by region, with the highest rates observed in Latin America (28.1%). ESBL-phenotype E. coli, ESBL-phenotype Klebsiella spp., and CRE phenotypes also increased over the surveillance period (Fig. 4). MDR rates were highest among the nonfermentative GNB (P. aeruginosa at 26.3% and Acinetobacter baumannii-Acinetobacter calcoaceticus complex at 70.6%); 48 isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii-Acinetobacter calcoaceticus (0.9%) and 9 isolates of P. aeruginosa (<0.1%) were pan-drug resistant. Colistin was the only agent with predictable activity against Acinetobacter baumannii-Acinetobacter calcoaceticus complex (96.9% susceptible; Table 5).
The antimicrobial activity of selected agents against the 107,617 Enterobacteriaceae isolates is outlined in Table 5. Over 95% of these BSI pathogens were susceptible in vitro to amikacin, ceftazidime-avibactam, carbapenems, and tigecycline.
DISCUSSION
Many surveillance programs are designed to monitor trends in BSI. However, the scope of most programs is limited to specific patient populations, countries, or regions and the programs do not confirm the organism identification or susceptibility data at a reference laboratory. The SENTRY Program performs global surveillance, monitoring pathogens from consecutive BSI episodes and testing all isolates at the central reference laboratory. Collecting isolates from consecutive episodes allows inference of rates of prevalence at each site, providing the opportunity to examine large-scale trends.
Major findings from the first 2 decades of SENTRY Program BSI surveillance include (i) the predominance of S. aureus and E. coli as BSI pathogens worldwide, (ii) the decline in the proportion of BSI due to important resistant Gram-positive pathogens (ORSA, VRE, daptomycin resistance among S. aureus and enterococci [DRE]) during the second decade of surveillance, and (iii) the ongoing increase in the detection of GNB and in MDR-GNB as a proportion of all causes of BSI worldwide.
Population-based BSI surveillance is consistent with our findings regarding the prominence of S. aureus and E. coli as BSI pathogens. Laupland has reviewed population-based BSI surveillance programs from various regions, noting that E. coli and S. aureus were the two most common BSI pathogens, with estimated incidence rates of 35 and 25 per 100,000, respectively. By comparison, the next most common BSI cause was S. pneumoniae, at 10 cases/100,000. SENTRY surveillance suggests that E. coli has become slightly more prominent than S. aureus over the past 2 decades, while the proportion of BSI caused by S. pneumoniae has declined. The reasons for these trends are not yet understood but may be related to changes in health care delivery, emergence and global spread of the E. coli sequence type 131 clone, increased focus on S. aureus disease prevention in community and health care settings, and the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines. Whatever the reasons, our findings suggest that priority should be given to developing novel prevention approaches for these two important BSI pathogens, including continued research and development of vaccine candidates.
For the first decade of SENTRY BSI surveillance, the proportions of important resistant phenotypes among Gram-positive pathogens (ORSA and VRE) were stable or increasing. Somewhat surprisingly, the proportions of S. aureus BSI and Enterococcus sp. BSI due to ORSA and VRE, respectively, declined over the past 5 to 10 years of the surveillance period. The decline in the proportion of ORSA that we report is consistent with other regional and national surveillance programs that observed reductions in ORSA infections, or in the proportion of S. aureus that are ORSA, during the decade of the 2000s. Although this decline has coincided with an increased emphasis on hospital infection prevention practices worldwide, the reasons for it are unclear and likely to be complex and multifactorial. We discuss this in more detail in a recent report on overall S. aureus infections at all anatomic infection sites in the SENTRY Program. We also observed that the percentage of vancomycin resistance among enterococci stabilized and has begun to decline. Given the fact that VRE BSI is an almost exclusively health care-associated infection, it seems likely that a decline in VRE as a proportion of all enterococcal infections is related to improved hospital infection prevention and coincides with general reductions in the rates of health care-associated infections. Finally, only one S. aureus BSI isolate with vancomycin resistance (MIC = 8 mg/liter) was detected across 2 decades of surveillance, and daptomycin resistance among indicated S. aureus and Enterococcus spp. (MIC, >1 mg/liter) has remained extremely uncommon.
In contrast to the resistance trends seen among Gram-positive pathogens, SENTRY surveillance revealed that detection of GNB is increasing as a proportion of all BSI causes and that the proportion of important GNB resistance phenotypes has increased over the past 2 decades. Our findings support reports of the emergence and spread of ESBL and carbapenemase enzymes worldwide. While some of these enzymes, e.g., CTX-M and KPC, have disseminated globally, rates of regional (and even local) variations in prevalence are substantial. This increases the importance of developing regional surveillance and prevention collaborations in an attempt to interrupt transmission in communities and across health care networks. Beyond Enterobacteriaceae, the most resistant GNB in our surveillance were the nonfermenters P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. These are the species among which the pan-drug-resistant GNB are most likely to be detected and for which new drug development is increasingly critical.
The surveillance data we present in this report have limitations. As a sentinel network that collects pathogens from selected medical centers, the SENTRY Program does not provide population-based information about the incidence of infections in a given region. In addition, not all sentinel medical centers participated in each year of the 20-year surveillance program. As participating centers leave the program, additional centers from that region are added, with the goal of maintaining robust and broadly representative samples from as many countries and regions as possible. Furthermore, regions of the world with limited resources for clinical laboratory support, e.g., Africa, are also underrepresented or not represented in this report. Finally, while we have investigated some of the trends noted, we do not present our molecular or sequencing data in this report.
Nonetheless, the duration and global scope of the SENTRY Program provide important insights into trends in pathogen frequency and antimicrobial resistance trends among BSI pathogens. While E. coli and S. aureus remain the major causes of BSI worldwide, there is an important divergence between the antimicrobial resistance challenges posed by Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial causes of BSI. While the most important resistance phenotypes among Gram-positive BSI pathogens are stable or declining as a proportion of reported infections, the proportion of MDR GNB is increasing worldwide. Improved diagnostic, therapeutic, and preventive approaches are urgently needed for these pathogens. Ongoing global surveillance remains important to help inform development, implementation, and follow-up of these approaches.
Organism collection.
SENTRY is a sentinel surveillance program for tracking antimicrobial resistance worldwide via a global network of medical centers. Each participating SENTRY Program center submitted bacterial isolates and clinical data for consecutive unique episodes of BSI each month during the surveillance period (one isolate per patient, from any acute care setting). Isolate identification was confirmed at the central reference laboratory (JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, IA, USA) using conventional and proteomic methods. This report describes the organism distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility trends among the 264,901 BSI isolates collected from 238 SENTRY participating centers in North America (72 centers in the United States and Canada), Latin America (18 centers in 7 countries), Europe (65 centers in 23 countries), and the Asia-Pacific region (83 centers in 12 countries) between January 1997 and December 2016. When the sample collection date was 3 or more days after the admission date, we designated the BSI episode a “hospital-onset” episode.
Resistance phenotypes.
VRE was defined on the basis of a vancomycin MIC of >4 mg/liter (nonsusceptible per CLSI and resistant per the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing [EUCAST]). CRE was defined as resistance to meropenem, imipenem (not applied for Proteus mirabilis or indole-positive Proteeae), and/or doripenem. The ESBL phenotype was defined as E. coli, P. mirabilis, and Klebsiella spp. with an aztreonam, ceftazidime, or ceftriaxone MIC of ≥2 mg/liter. MDR among GNB was defined using CDC criteria (nonsusceptibility to at least one drug in ≥3 of the following antibiotic classes: broad-spectrum cephalosporins, carbapenems, broad-spectrum penicillin combined with a β-lactamase inhibitor, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, glycylcyclines (for Enterobacteriaceae only), and the polymyxins. Pan-drug resistance was defined as nonsusceptibility to a drug in all antibiotic classes.
Susceptibility methods.
Susceptibility testing was performed against more than 20 antimicrobial agents, using reference broth microdilution methods and interpretive MIC breakpoints as described by CLSI and EUCAST. FDA breakpoints were used if CLSI breakpoints were not available. Quality control was performed as recommended by CLSI, and results were all within established ranges.
References 42
- 1.
McNamara JF, Righi E, Wright H, Hartel GF, Harris PNA, Paterson DL 2018 Long-term morbidity and mortality following bloodstream infection: a systematic literature review. J Infect 77:1–8. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jinf.2018.03.005 (opens in a new tab)
- 2.
Cosgrove SE, Sakoulas G, Perencevich EN, Schwaber MJ, Karchmer AW, Carmeli Y 2003 Comparison of mortality associated with methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 36:53–59. doi:.
Not in our library10.1086/345476 (opens in a new tab)
- 3.
Edmond MB, Ober JF, Dawson JD, Weinbaum DL, Wenzel RP 1996 Vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia: natural history and attributable mortality. Clin Infect Dis 23:1234–1239. doi:.
Not in our library10.1093/clinids/23.6.1234 (opens in a new tab)
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
Diekema DJ, Pfaller MA, Jones RN, Doern GV, Kugler KC, Beach ML, Sader HS 2000 Trends in antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with bloodstream infections in the USA, Canada and Latin America. SENTRY Participants Group. Int J Antimicrob Agents 13:257–271. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/s0924-8579(99)00131-4 (opens in a new tab)
- 7.
Burton DC, Edwards JR, Horan TC, Jernigan JA, Fridkin SK 2009 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus central line-associated bloodstream infections in US intensive care units, 1997–2007. JAMA 301:727–736. doi:.
Not in our library10.1001/jama.2009.153 (opens in a new tab)
- 8.
Gagliotti C, Balode A, Baquero F, Degener J, Grundmann H, Gur D, Jarlier V, Kahlmeter G, Monen J, Monnet DL, Rossolini GM, Suetens C, Weist K, Heuer O; EARS-Net Participants (Disease Specific Contact Points for AMR). 2011 Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus: bad news and good news from the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net, formerly EARSS), 2002 to 2009. Euro Surveill 16(33):pii=19819. doi:.
Not in our library10.2807/ese.16.11.19819-en (opens in a new tab)
- 9.
Johnson AP, Davies J, Guy R, Abernethy J, Sheridan E, Pearson A, Duckworth G 2012 Mandatory surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia in England: the first 10 years. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:802–809. doi:.
Not in our library10.1093/jac/dkr561 (opens in a new tab)
- 10.
Laupland KB 2013 Incidence of bloodstream infection: a review of population-based studies. Clin Microbiol Infect 19:492–500. doi:.
Not in our library10.1111/1469-0691.12144 (opens in a new tab)
- 11.
Skogberg K, Lyytikainen O, Ollgren J, Nuorti JP, Ruutu P 2012 Population-based burden of bloodstream infections in Finland. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:E170–E176. doi:.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03845.x (opens in a new tab)
- 12.
Weiner LM, Webb AK, Limbago B, Dudeck MA, Patel J, Kallen AJ, Edwards JR, Sievert DM 2016 Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011–2014. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 37:1288–1301. doi:.
Not in our library10.1017/ice.2016.174 (opens in a new tab)
- 13.
Wilson J, Elgohari S, Livermore DM, Cookson B, Johnson A, Lamagni T, Chronias A, Sheridan E 2011 Trends among pathogens reported as causing bacteraemia in England, 2004–2008. Clin Microbiol Infect 17:451–458. doi:.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03262.x (opens in a new tab)
- 14.
Nicolas-Chanoine MH, Blanco J, Leflon-Guibout V, Demarty R, Alonso MP, Canica MM, Park YJ, Lavigne JP, Pitout J, Johnson JR 2008 Intercontinental emergence of Escherichia coli clone O25:H4-ST131 producing CTX-M-15. J Antimicrob Chemother 61:273–281. doi:.
Not in our library10.1093/jac/dkm464 (opens in a new tab)
- 15.
Knox J, Uhlemann AC, Lowy FD 2015 Staphylococcus aureus infections: transmission within households and the community. Trends Microbiol 23:437–444. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tim.2015.03.007 (opens in a new tab)
- 16.
Kallen AJ, Mu Y, Bulens S, Reingold A, Petit S, Gershman K, Ray SM, Harrison LH, Lynfield R, Dumyati G, Townes JM, Schaffner W, Patel PR, Fridkin SK 2010 Health care-associated invasive MRSA infections, 2005–2008. JAMA 304:641–648. doi:.
Not in our library10.1001/jama.2010.1115 (opens in a new tab)
- 17.
Klevens RM, Morrison MA, Nadle J, Petit S, Gershman K, Ray S, Harrison LH, Lynfield R, Dumyati G, Townes JM, Craig AS, Zell ER, Fosheim GE, McDougal LK, Carey RB, Fridkin SK 2007 Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the United States. JAMA 298:1763–1771. doi:.
Not in our library10.1001/jama.298.15.1763 (opens in a new tab)
- 18.
Rosen JB, Thomas AR, Lexau CA, Reingold A, Hadler JL, Harrison LH, Bennett NM, Schaffner W, Farley MM, Beall BW, Moore MR; CDC Emerging Infections Program Network. 2011 Geographic variation in invasive pneumococcal disease following pneumococcal conjugate vaccine introduction in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 53:137–143. doi:.
Not in our library10.1093/cid/cir326 (opens in a new tab)
- 19.
Giersing BK, Dastgheyb SS, Modjarrad K, Moorthy V 2016 Status of vaccine research and development of vaccines for Staphylococcus aureus. Vaccine 34:2962–2966. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.03.110 (opens in a new tab)
- 20.
Huttner A, Hatz C, van den Dobbelsteen G, Abbanat D, Hornacek A, Frolich R, Dreyer AM, Martin P, Davies T, Fae K, van den Nieuwenhof I, Thoelen S, de Valliere S, Kuhn A, Bernasconi E, Viereck V, Kavvadias T, Kling K, Ryu G, Hulder T, Groger S, Scheiner D, Alaimo C, Harbarth S, Poolman J, Fonck VG 2017 Safety, immunogenicity, and preliminary clinical efficacy of a vaccine against extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli in women with a history of recurrent urinary tract infection: a randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1b trial. Lancet Infect Dis 17:528–537. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30108-1 (opens in a new tab)
- 21.
Sader HS, Mendes RE, Streit JM, Flamm RK 2017 Antimicrobial susceptibility trends among Staphylococcus aureus from U.S. hospitals: results from 7 years of the ceftaroline (AWARE) surveillance program (2010–2016). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e01043-17. doi:.
Not in our library10.1128/aac.01043-17 (opens in a new tab)
- 22.
Chambers HF, Deleo FR 2009 Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:629–641. doi:.
Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro2200 (opens in a new tab)
- 23.
Chatterjee SS, Otto M 2013 Improved understanding of factors driving methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus epidemic waves. Clin Epidemiol 5:205–217. doi:.
Not in our library10.2147/clep.s37071 (opens in a new tab)
- 24.
Perencevich EN, Diekema DJ 2010 Decline in invasive MRSA infection: where to go from here? JAMA 304:687–689. doi:.
Not in our library10.1001/jama.2010.1125 (opens in a new tab)
- 25.
Planet PJ 2017 Life after USA300: the rise and fall of a superbug. J Infect Dis 215:S71–S77. doi:.
Not in our library10.1093/infdis/jiw444 (opens in a new tab)
- 26.
Rolain JM, Abat C, Brouqui P, Raoult D 2015 Worldwide decrease in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: do we understand something? Clin Microbiol Infect 21:515–517. doi:.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmi.2015.04.017 (opens in a new tab)
- 27.
Diekema DJ, Pfaller MA, Shortridge D, Zervos M, Jones RN 2019 Twenty-year trends in antimicrobial susceptibilities among Staphylococcus aureus from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Open Forum Infect Dis 6:S47–S53. doi:.
Not in our library10.1093/ofid/ofy270 (opens in a new tab)
- 28.
Magill SS, O’Leary E, Janelle SJ, Thompson DL, Dumyati G, Nadle J, Wilson LE, Kainer MA, Lynfield R, Greissman S, Ray SM, Beldavs Z, Gross C, Bamberg W, Sievers M, Concannon C, Buhr N, Warnke L, Maloney M, Ocampo V, Brooks J, Oyewumi T, Sharmin S, Richards K, Rainbow J, Samper M, Hancock EB, Leaptrot D, Scalise E, Badrun F, Phelps R, Edwards JR; Emerging Infections Program Hospital Prevalence Survey Team. 2018 Changes in prevalence of health care-associated infections in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med 379:1732–1744. doi:.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1801550 (opens in a new tab)
- 29.
Castanheira M, Mendes RE, Jones RN, Sader HS 2016 Changes in the frequencies of beta-lactamase genes among Enterobacteriaceae isolates in U.S. hospitals, 2012 to 2014: activity of ceftazidime-avibactam tested against beta-lactamase-producing isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:4770–4777. doi:.
Not in our library10.1128/aac.00540-16 (opens in a new tab)
- 30.
McDanel J, Schweizer M, Crabb V, Nelson R, Samore M, Khader K, Blevins AE, Diekema D, Chiang HY, Nair R, Perencevich E 2017 Incidence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella infections in the United States: a systematic literature review. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 38:1209–1215. doi:.
Not in our library10.1017/ice.2017.156 (opens in a new tab)
- 31.
Jacob JT, Klein E, Laxminarayan R, Beldavs Z, Lynfield R, Kallen AJ, Ricks P, Edwards J, Srinivasan A, Fridkin S, Rasheed KJ, Lonsway D, Bulens S, Herrera R, McDonald LC, Patel J, Limbago B, Bell M, Cardo D 2013 Vital signs: carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 62:165–170.
Not in our library
- 32.
Tangden T, Giske CG 2015 Global dissemination of extensively drug-resistant carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: clinical perspectives on detection, treatment and infection control. J Intern Med 277:501–512. doi:.
Not in our library10.1111/joim.12342 (opens in a new tab)
- 33.
van Duin D, Doi Y 2017 The global epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Virulence 8:460–469. doi:.
Not in our library10.1080/21505594.2016.1222343 (opens in a new tab)
- 34.
Ray MJ, Lin MY, Tang AS, Arwady MA, Lavin MA, Runningdeer E, Jovanov D, Trick WE 2018 Regional spread of an outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae through an ego network of healthcare facilities. Clin Infect Dis 67:407–410. doi:.
Not in our library10.1093/cid/ciy084 (opens in a new tab)
- 35.
Slayton RB, Toth D, Lee BY, Tanner W, Bartsch SM, Khader K, Wong K, Brown K, McKinnell JA, Ray W, Miller LG, Rubin M, Kim DS, Adler F, Cao C, Avery L, Stone NT, Kallen A, Samore M, Huang SS, Fridkin S, Jernigan JA 2015 Vital signs: estimated effects of a coordinated approach for action to reduce antibiotic-resistant infections in health care facilities - United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 64:826–831. doi:.
Not in our library10.15585/mmwr.mm6430a4 (opens in a new tab)
- 36.
Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, Harbarth S, Hindler JF, Kahlmeter G, Olsson-Liljequist B, Paterson DL, Rice LB, Stelling J, Struelens MJ, Vatopoulos A, Weber JT, Monnet DL 2012 Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:268–281. doi:.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x (opens in a new tab)
- 37.
Isler B, Doi Y, Bonomo RA, Paterson DL 2019 New treatment options against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e01110.
Not in our library10.1128/aac.01110-18 (opens in a new tab)
- 38.
Perez F, Hujer AM, Hujer KM, Decker BK, Rather PN, Bonomo RA 2007 Global challenge of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:3471–3484. doi:.
Not in our library10.1128/aac.01464-06 (opens in a new tab)
- 39.
CLSI. 2018 M07Ed11E. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard: 11th ed Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
Not in our library
- 40.
CLSI. 2017 M100-S27. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 27th informational supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
Not in our library
- 41.
EUCAST. 2017 Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MIC's and zone diameters. Version 7.1, March 2017. http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_7.1_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf. Accessed March 2017.
Not in our library
- 42.
EUCAST. 2018 Package insert, Allergan USA, Inc. https://www.allergan.com/assets/pdf/dalvance_pi. Accessed 22 August 2018.
Not in our library
Cited by papers we hold 8
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Infections, Animal Modeling, and Therapeutics · 2023No notice
- Vaccination to Prevent Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infections · 2022Not checked
- Antimicrobial Resistance and Molecular Epidemiology of Escherichia coli From Bloodstream Infection in Shanghai, China, 2016–2019 · 2022Not checked
- Identification of distinct capsule types associated with Serratia marcescens infection isolates. · 2022Not checked
- An Update of Mobile Colistin Resistance in Non-Fermentative Gram-Negative Bacilli · 2022Not checked
- Innate Host Defense against Klebsiella pneumoniae and the Outlook for Development of Immunotherapies · 2021Not checked
- Bloodstream infections in adult patients with malignancy, epidemiology, microbiology, and risk factors associated with mortality and multi-drug resistance · 2021No notice
- Fecal Microbiome Characteristics and the Resistome Associated With Acquisition of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms Among Elderly Subjects · 2019Not checked
Questions about this paper
We email you if it is retracted, withdrawn, corrected or flagged.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.