No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 22, 2026.
Transcriptional, Functional, and Mechanistic Comparisons of Stem Cell–Derived Hepatocytes, HepaRG Cells, and Three-Dimensional Human Hepatocyte Spheroids as Predictive In Vitro Systems for Drug-Induced Liver Injury
Catherine C. Bell, Volker M. Lauschke, Sabine U. Vorrink and 4 more
Drug Metabolism and Disposition · 2017 · CC BY
Abstract
Reliable and versatile hepatic in vitro systems for the prediction of drug pharmacokinetics and toxicity are essential constituents of preclinical safety assessment pipelines for new medicines. Here, we compared three emerging cell systems-hepatocytes derived from induced pluripotent stem cells, HepaRG cells, and three-dimensional primary human hepatocyte (PHH) spheroids-at transcriptional and functional levels in a multicenter study to evaluate their potential as predictive models for drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Transcriptomic analyses revealed widespread gene expression differences between the three cell models, with 8148 of 17,462 analyzed genes (47%) being differentially expressed. Expression levels of genes involved in the metabolism of endogenous as well as xenobiotic compounds were significantly elevated in PHH spheroids, whereas genes involved in cell division and endocytosis were significantly upregulated in HepaRG cells and hepatocytes derived from induced pluripotent stem cells, respectively. Consequently, PHH spheroids were more sensitive to a panel of drugs with distinctly different toxicity mechanisms, an effect that was amplified by long-term exposure using repeated treatments. Importantly, toxicogenomic analyses revealed that transcriptomic changes in PHH spheroids were in compliance with cholestatic, carcinogenic, or steatogenic in vivo toxicity mechanisms at clinically relevant drug concentrations. Combined, the data reveal important phenotypic differences between the three cell systems and suggest that PHH spheroids can be used for functional investigations of drug-induced liver injury in vivo in humans.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 22, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) poses a serious threat to patients, accounting for 13% of acute liver failures and 15% of liver transplantations. Idiosyncratic DILI events, which are typically delayed in onset and restricted to predisposed individuals, account for 10% of these cases and occur with an overall incidence of about 13–19 per 100,000 individuals. Adverse drug reactions significantly increase the length and costs of hospitalization by 1.9 days and US$2262–3244, respectively, and are associated with a 1.9-fold increased mortality risk. Moreover, hepatic liabilities are important cost drivers for the pharmaceutical industry that can result in late-stage attrition of drug candidates or postmarketing withdrawals, as exemplified by bromfenac, troglitazone, ximelagatran, and pemoline. In addition, decreased prescribing due to black box warnings reduces sales, and 10 of 45 compounds that were endowed with such boxed warnings between 1975 and 2000 received their label due to hepatotoxicity.
Toxicity prediction of newly developed compounds in preclinical stages encompasses an array of in silico, in vitro, and in vivo studies. Animal testing has long been the cornerstone for safety assessments of novel chemical entities. Yet the liver is an organ with pronounced species differences with regard to expression and catalytic activities of factors involved in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME). Therefore, animal models do not accurately replicate the etiology and pathogenesis of human liver injury. Thus, due to growing recognition of the limited predictive validity of animal models and increasing legislative pressure to reduce, refine, or replace (“3R” concept) the use of animal models, there is a clear need for predictive in vitro models, which faithfully reflect human liver physiology and function.
Hepatic cell lines are frequently employed in preclinical screening assays, due to their ease of use, ready availability, and low costs. Importantly, however, most hepatic cell lines lack relevant hepatic phenotypes, due to limited expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes, which makes extrapolation of the results to humans questionable. The HepaRG cell line presents a cell system that has been reported to be phenotypically stable, thus allowing long-term culture and repeated-exposure studies. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have the advantage that they can be generated from any human cell type, which allows the retrospective acquisition of cellular material from individuals with a particular genotype or phenotype of interest, such as an idiosyncratic adverse drug reaction, providing an interesting model for deciphering mechanisms of genetically determined DILI reactions.
Primary human hepatocytes (PHHs) are considered the gold standard for studying liver function. However, their rapid dedifferentiation in conventional two-dimensional (2D) monolayer cultures, paralleled by a loss of hepatic functionality, renders them unsuitable for long-term studies and significantly impairs their predictive power for DILI risk. To prevent dedifferentiation, an array of three-dimensional (3D) culture techniques has been developed in which hepatic phenotypes are maintained for extended periods of time. One promising strategy is the culture of PHHs as 3D spheroidal aggregates in which hepatocyte-specific functions can be retained for several weeks, thus enabling repeated-exposure experiments.
In this study, we characterized the transcriptomic signatures of HepaRG cells, PHH spheroid cultures, and hepatocyte-like cells (HLCs) derived from iPSCs (hiPS-Hep cells). Whereas expression patterns in PHH spheroids resembled freshly isolated hepatocytes, HepaRG and hiPS-Hep cells exhibited widespread differences in gene expression, particularly in genes involved in the metabolism of endogenous and xenobiotic compounds. These gene expression differences translated into functional differences as assessed by the sensitivity toward six different hepatotoxic compounds, with PHH spheroids constituting the most sensitive model that detected hepatotoxicity at clinically relevant concentrations. Importantly, toxicogenomic analyses revealed that transcriptional responses elicited by compounds causing inhibition of mitochondrial respiration, perturbation of β-oxidation, cholestatic injury, or genotoxicity in vivo were faithfully reflected in this model. Combined, our data indicate that phenotypes and sensitivities to hepatotoxic agents differ considerably between preclinical cell models and that PHH spheroids are more physiologically relevant and mechanistically accurate in detecting and investigating hepatic liabilities of drugs as compared with HepaRG and hiPS-Hep cells.
Cell Culture.
Cryopreserved PHH 3D spheroids were cultured in culture medium (Williams’ E medium supplemented with 2 mM l-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 10 µg/ml insulin, 5.5 µg/ml transferrin, 6.7 ng/ml sodium selenite, and 100 nM dexamethasone), as previously described. Four days after seeding, 50% of the culture medium was substituted with fresh fetal bovine serum (FBS)–free medium and the medium was subsequently exchanged daily until the start of treatment at day 7. Hepatocytes in monolayer culture were seeded into plates coated with 5 μg/cm2 Rat Tail Collagen Type I (Corning, Corning, NY) in culture medium with 10% FBS. After 2 hours of attachment, the medium was replaced with serum-free culture medium. Donor demographics for all PHH used in this study are presented in Table 1. hiPS-Hep cells were obtained by differentiation from the human iPSC line ChiPSC18 (DEF-hiPSC ChiPSC18) (Cellartis; Takara Bio Europe AB, Göteborg, Sweden) using the Cellartis DE Differentiation Kit and the Cellartis HEP Differentiation Kit (Takara Bio Europe AB) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After initiation of differentiation at day 22, the HLCs were dissociated and reseeded in an appropriate cell culture format for transcriptional analyses and viability assessments. HepaRG cells (Biopredic International, Saint Grégoire, France) were cultured and maintained in culture medium (Williams’ E basal medium plus GlutaMAX containing phenol red; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) with Additive 710 (Biopredic International). For differentiation, cells were cultured in culture medium with Additive 720 (Biopredic International). Cells were maintained in growth medium for 2 weeks followed by 2 weeks of differentiation medium. The medium was changed to culture medium without phenol red and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) 1 day prior to the initiation of treatment.
Compound Exposure and Generation of Toxicity Curves.
Compounds were dissolved in DMSO and diluted in FBS-free medium to a final DMSO concentration of 0.4%. Treatment was performed every 2 to 3 days in FBS-free medium. In the acute setting, viability was determined after a single-dose exposure for 2 days. Under long-term treatment, cells were repeatedly treated for 7 days (three exposures) and 14 days (six exposures). Viability, as assessed by cellular ATP levels, was determined using the CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay (Promega, Nacka, Sweden). Luminescence was measured and the samples were blank corrected and normalized to vehicle control. IC50 values were calculated using a sigmoidal dose-response regression model constrained at viability 0 and 100 (GraphPad Prism software; GraphPad Inc., La Jolla, CA). IC10 values were calculated as follows, with x = 10:
Transcriptomic Analyses.
After 2, 7, and 14 days in culture, cells were harvested in RNAprotect Cell Reagent (Qiagen, Sollentuna, Sweden). RNA was extracted with the AllPrep DNA/RNA Mini Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen). Total RNA samples (45 ng) were labeled with cyanine 3, hybridized on Agilent Whole Human Genome Oligo Microarray slides 8×60K, washed, and scanned on an Agilent MicroArray Scanner (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Images were processed using Agilent Feature Extraction software (version 10.7.3.1). Gene expression differences are expressed relative to the respective spheroid DMSO control samples at the same time point. Microarray data were uploaded to the Gene Expression Omnibus database (submission number GSE93840).
Data Analysis.
Expression data were analyzed in Qlucore Omics Explorer 3.1 (Qlucore, Lund, Sweden). Gene set enrichment analyses were performed using WebGestalt. To assess statistical significances, heteroscedastic, two-tailed, unpaired t tests were performed and P values below 0.05 were considered significant. To correct for multiple tests, the Benjamini–Hochberg algorithm was used with false discovery rates (FDRs) as indicated.
Transcriptional Characterization of Hepatic Cell Models.
When cultured in 2D monolayers, PHHs rapidly dedifferentiate within hours, at least in part due to wide-scale microRNA-mediated inhibition of drug-metabolizing enzymes, transporters, and other hepatic genes. In contrast, expression levels of most important phase I (CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP3A4, and CYP2D6) and phase II (GSTT1 and UGT1A1) drug-metabolizing enzymes, drug and bile transporters (ABCB11 and ABCC1 and SLCO1B1), ligand-activated nuclear receptors (CAR, PXR, and PPARA), and other genes with importance for hepatic functions (ALB and HNF4A) were preserved in 3D PHH spheroid cultures, approximating levels found in the corresponding freshly isolated cells (Fig. 1A). When hepatocytes from the same donors were cultured in 2D monolayers, expression of the same genes was downregulated up to 1800-fold, directly demonstrating the drastic effect of dedifferentiation on hepatic gene expression (Fig. 1B).
We then benchmarked the mRNA expression patterns of PHH spheroids and HepaRG and hiPS-Hep cell systems using transcriptomic analyses (Fig. 2). Importantly, we found pronounced gene expression differences between the three models, with 8148 of 17,462 genes (47%) being differentially expressed over the course of 3 weeks in culture (Fig. 2A; FDR < 0.05, Benjamini–Hochberg correction). Genes involved in DNA replication (Padjusted = 5 × 10−7), mismatch repair (Padjusted = 6 × 10−6), and purine metabolism (Padjusted = 0.0013) were significantly upregulated in HepaRG cells, whereas genes implicated in endocytosis (Padjusted = 8 × 10−10), focal adhesion signaling (Padjusted = 0.0001), and lysosomes (Padjusted = 0.0001) were overexpressed in hiPS-Hep cells. In addition, pathways with general importance for cellular functions, such as ribosomes (Padjusted = 0.0034), cell cycle (Padjusted = 0.0083), and RNA transport (Padjusted = 0.0083) were upregulated in both HepaRG and hiPS-Hep cells. Importantly, genes involved in the metabolism of endogenous as well as xenobiotic compounds were expressed at significantly elevated levels in PHH spheroids compared with HepaRG and hiPS-Hep cells (Padjusted = 3 × 10−33). Although principal component analyses revealed pronounced changes over culture time in HepaRG and hiPS-Hep cells, gene expression signatures in PHH spheroids were stable over the course of 2 weeks (Fig. 2B).
When focusing on genes with importance for drug ADME, we found that variations between the cell systems differed by gene class (Fig. 3). Levels of most phase I enzymes including major cytochrome P450 enzymes, such as CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, and CYP2D6, were much higher in PHH spheroids compared with HepaRG and hiPS-Hep cells (Fig. 3A). DPYD, which encodes the rate-limiting enzyme in pyrimidine metabolism, was expressed at similar levels in PHH spheroids and HepaRG cells. In contrast, CYP3A7 and CYP3A5, which constitute the major CYP3As expressed in fetal liver, were highly expressed in hiPS-Hep cells.
Distinctly different sets of phase II enzymes were expressed in the three cell models. Expression of most transcripts encoding GST enzymes was highest in hiPS-Hep cells, and levels of UGTs and TPMT were elevated in 3D-cultured PHHs (Fig. 3B). Notably, phase II gene expression was generally low in HepaRG cells, suggesting a lower capacity of this cell model to accurately reflect and predict complex drug ADME patterns. Although relevant transporter genes were expressed in all three cell models, their relative abundances differed drastically (Fig. 3C). In PHH spheroids, high levels of physiologically important transporters—such as the bile acid transporters bile salt export pump (BSEP) and Na+-taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP) encoded by ABCB11 and SLC10A1, respectively; steroid and thyroid hormone transporters (SLCO1B1 and SLCO1B3); and MDR2/3, the phosphatidylcholine transporter encoded by ABCB4—were observed. In contrast, transporters implicated in drug resistance of cancer cells were upregulated in hiPS-Hep cells, including ABCB1 (MDR1) and ABCG2 (BCRP).
Toxicity in Hepatic Cell Systems under Repeated-Exposure Regimes.
Next, we investigated functional consequences of the observed expression differences. Previous studies have indicated that although PHHs provide a more predictive model than other hepatic cell lines, their predictive power in acute single-exposure studies in 2D cultures is significantly limited, at least in part due to the rapid loss of hepatic gene expression. Furthermore, with respect to the clinical profile of in vivo toxicity events, assessment of chronic drug-induced hepatotoxicity is of particular importance. Thus, here we investigated the effect of repeated-exposure regimens and analyzed the sensitivity of the three cell models to six hepatotoxic compounds that cause toxicity by distinctly different mechanisms (Figs. 4 and 5). We focused on 1) acetaminophen (APAP), which primarily causes hepatotoxicity due to reactive metabolite formation; 2) aflatoxin B1 as a genotoxic agent; 3) the antiarrhythmic drug amiodarone, which inhibits acyl-CoA transport and mitochondrial respiration; 4) the cholestatic agent chlorpromazine; 5) troglitazone as an inhibitor of β-oxidation that also causes direct opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore; and 6) the anticoagulant ximelagatran as a respiratory chain inhibitor.
The three cell systems showed drastic differences in their sensitivity to APAP toxicity. hiPS-Hep cells were insensitive to APAP toxicity, even after 14 days of treatment (14-day IC50 = 9439 µM). In contrast, the HepaRG cell line detected toxicity already in the acute setting at high concentrations (48-hour IC50 = 5916 µM) and the sensitivity increased further upon repeated exposures to approximate plasma levels in patients after acute APAP overdose (14-day IC50 = 1311 µM; APAP plasma concentration for which immediate treatment is stipulated: >0.7–1.3 mM depending on additional risk factors; ). In PHH spheroids, a drastic increase in sensitivity to APAP toxicity was apparent with chronic exposures, indicating toxicity slightly below typical overdose concentrations after 14 days of exposure (14-day IC50 = 644 µM; therapeutic Cmax = 136 µM; ).
Aflatoxin B1 toxicity showed substantial increases in toxicity over time in all cell systems. PHH spheroids were the most sensitive system in the acute as well as chronic setting, indicating toxicity at exposure levels detected in exposed individuals (28.5 nM; ), followed by HepaRG cells.
hiPS-Hep cells were the only system to indicate amiodarone toxicity already after 48 hours, albeit only at high concentrations. After chronic exposure, all three cell models detected amiodarone-induced hepatotoxicity at similar concentrations, with PHH spheroids being the most sensitive, approximating exposure levels reported as toxic in patients (14-day IC50 = 11.9 µM for PHHs, 18.5 µM for HepaRG cells, and 15 µM for hiPS-Hep cells; human toxic Cmax = 3.8 µM; ).
Although chlorpromazine-induced hepatic injury was detected by all three models, PHH spheroids were the most sensitive at all time points investigated and at concentrations approaching clinical exposure levels (14-day IC50 = 4.6 µM for PHHs, 34.1 µM for HepaRG cells, and 24.6 µM for hiPS-Hep cells; human toxic Cmax = 1.6 µM; ).
Similarly, all three cell systems indicated troglitazone toxicity at clinically relevant concentrations, with IC50 values in PHH spheroids reaching therapeutic levels after chronic exposures (14-day IC50 = 1.5 µM for PHHs, 34.6 µM for HepaRG cells, and 18.7 µM for hiPS-Hep cells; therapeutic Cmax = 2.82 µM; ).
PHH spheroids were the only system to indicate toxicity of ximelagatran after prolonged treatment (7 and 14 days), but only at relatively high concentrations that significantly exceeded therapeutic levels (14-day IC50 = 165 µM; therapeutic Cmax = 0.3 µM; ). It has previously proven difficult to detect ximelagatran toxicity in various in vitro systems and the mechanisms underlying this toxicity are still unclear, although evidence that ximelagatran inhibits mitochondrial respiration was recently presented.
In summary, although sensitivities differed between cell models for the hepatotoxic model compounds in the acute, single-dose setting, the PHH spheroid system was the most sensitive cell model after long-term exposure to all compounds tested (Fig. 5).
Toxicogenomic Analysis of Gene Expression Changes Preceding Compound Toxicity.
Next, we examined whether relevant compound-specific toxicity mechanisms were reflected using toxicogenomic profiling. To this end, we focused on the PHH spheroid model as the most sensitive system that detected toxicity of most tested compounds at clinically relevant exposure levels. To uncouple toxicity mechanisms and outcomes (i.e., study the changes in transcriptional signatures that precede the induction of cell death), we chose subtoxic concentrations (IC10) of the six model compounds. After 14 days of treatment, no significant expression changes were observed in APAP-, troglitazone-, and ximelagatran-treated samples (data not shown), suggesting that these compounds trigger cell death directly without extensive transcriptional perturbations.
In contrast, pronounced changes of gene expression signatures were evident upon treatment with aflatoxin B1, amiodarone, and chlorpromazine (Fig. 6). Aflatoxin B1 induced nucleotide excision repair, apoptosis, and DNA replication (Fig. 6A), in agreement with its genotoxicity and with previous in vivo findings in aflatoxin-exposed rats and tree shrews. We detected significant downregulation of FHIT, a tumor suppressor repressing canonical Wnt signaling by inhibition of β-catenin, whose activity is commonly impaired in preneoplastic lesions. Similarly, we detected a reduction in levels of the methyltransferase SMYD3, which is implicated in hepatocellular carcinoma (Fig. 6B). Moreover, p53 signaling target genes, such as the p53 effector TP53I3, RRM2B, and DDB2 (which play roles in DNA damage repair) and SENS1 (a protein mediating the tumor-suppressive effect of p53 by inhibiting mechanistic target of rapamycin), were increasingly upregulated with prolonged exposure.
PPAR signaling was significantly upregulated after chronic amiodarone exposure, mimicking in vivo gene expression modulations in mice (Fig. 6A), resulting in increased expression of e.g. CPT1A, a PPARα target gene whose gene product is inhibited by amiodarone. Furthermore, we detected a progressive upregulation of key genes involved in lipid and cholesterol metabolism, such as HADHA, ACSL4, and HMGCR (Fig. 6C). Moreover, expression levels of G6PD, the central regulator of the pentose phosphate pathway that controls generation of NADPH, were significantly increased.
Prolonged chlorpromazine treatment caused the most pronounced perturbations of expression signatures, with 6755 genes identified as being differentially expressed (compared with 1520 for aflatoxin B1 and 863 for amiodarone). Among the deregulated pathways were bile acid metabolism (Padjusted = 1 × 10−5), reflecting the cholestatic mechanism of chlorpromazine toxicity. Higher expression of CYP1A2, whose gene product is involved in chlorpromazine metabolism, increased with chlorpromazine treatment, whereas transcript levels of CYP7A1, the key enzyme in bile acid synthesis, as well as of the bile transporters SLC22A1 (OCT1) and SLC10A1 (NTCP) decreased. Moreover, expression levels of SLC and ABC transporters were broadly repressed after 14 days of treatment (Fig. 6E), suggesting major alterations of underlying transcriptional networks.
Discussion
In this study, we compared the phenotypes of three emerging cell culture models for preclinical safety assessments of drugs and drug candidates: PHH spheroids, HepaRG cells, and hiPS-Hep cells. We found that mRNA expression levels of genes with importance for hepatic functionality in PHH spheroids pivoted around levels found in freshly isolated hepatocytes. These data corroborate the results of previous studies showing that 3D spheroid culture conditions improve the gene expression signatures and phenotypes of PHHs, resulting in an approximation of their physiologic counterparts in vivo in humans. Importantly, transcriptional signatures of HepaRG and hiPS-Hep cells drastically differed, with 8148 of 17,462 genes (47% of the assessed transcriptome) being differentially expressed between the three cell models (FDR < 0.05). Importantly, expression of genes encoding enzymes involved in xenobiotic metabolism was strongly reduced in HepaRG and hiPS-Hep cells compared with PHH spheroids (Padjusted = 3 × 10−9). Furthermore, HepaRG and hiPS-Hep cells exhibited impaired expression of genes involved in the metabolism of endogenous compounds, such as fatty acids (Padjusted = 3 × 10−10) and retinol (Padjusted = 2 × 10−9). Combined, these differences suggest impaired capacities of these two cell models to metabolize drugs and to faithfully mimic the mechanisms underlying compound toxicity.
When focusing on ADME genes, we detected highly elevated transcript levels of genes characteristic of the mature human liver, such as CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP3A4, ABCB11, and SLC10A1, in PHH spheroids. In contrast, hiPS-Hep cells showed increased levels of the fetal cytochrome P450s CYP3A5 and CYP3A7, as well as high expression of the most important fetal GST (GSTP1) and transporters whose expression correlated with dedifferentiation during carcinogenesis, such as ABCB1 and ABCG2. The data revealed that gene expression signatures in PHH spheroids closely resembled those detected in isolated hepatocytes. In contrast, reduced expression of many important hepatic genes was evident in HepaRG and hiPS-Hep cells, indicative of deficits in maturation.
To relate changes in transcription patterns to functional consequences, we examined the differential sensitivities of the three cell models to hepatotoxins. APAP toxicity is primarily due to reactive metabolite formation catalyzed by CYP2E1 and CYP3A4 causing subsequent glutathione depletion, but immune-mediated mechanisms have also been linked to APAP-induced liver injury (reviewed in ). In agreement with high CYP2E1 and CYP3A4 expression levels and physiologic but comparatively low expression of GSTs involved in NAPQI detoxification, PHH spheroids detected APAP toxicity after 14 days at concentrations below typical overdose levels. The finding that APAP toxicity was already detected at concentrations that are clinically considered safe is consistent with previous clinical reports showing liver damage, as indicated by serum alanine aminotransferase elevations above three times the upper limit, in 31%–44% of healthy volunteers receiving 4 g APAP daily for 14 days (peak APAP serum level average = 99.2 µM).
Similarly, hepatotoxicity of the mycotoxin aflatoxin B1 requires metabolic activation by CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 to a highly reactive 8,9-epoxide, which can lead to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma or, in rare cases, acute hepatotoxicity. Sensitivity to aflatoxin B1 toxicity was strongly pronounced in PHH spheroids, which show physiologic expression levels of the respective metabolizing enzymes (Fig. 3A). Combined, these data suggest that physiologic and temporally stable expression levels of ADME genes are required to detect hepatotoxicity of compounds that require metabolic activation.
The lipophilic benzofuran derivative amiodarone causes mitochondrial uncoupling due to influx of protonated amiodarone into the mitochondrial matrix. Furthermore, it impairs the respiratory chain complexes I, II, and III and inhibits carnitine palmitoyltransferase I, thus limiting the import of fatty acids into the mitochondria and reducing the flux through mitochondrial β-oxidation. Sensitivity to amiodarone hepatotoxicity did not drastically increase over time and was similar between the three cell models. Although amiodarone is extensively metabolized by CYP3A4 and CYP2C8, its therapeutic as well as toxicological effects seem to be caused by both the parent compound as well as its dealkylated metabolite. Consequently, amiodarone toxicity does not depend on bioactivation, which could provide an explanation for the similar sensitivity levels between the cell systems. These findings are in agreement with previous reports showing lipid accumulation in hiPS-Hep and HepaRG cells already after short-term amiodarone exposures.
Chlorpromazine causes primarily cholestatic liver injury and multiple toxicity mechanisms have been suggested, including perturbation of oxidative phosphorylation, inhibition of bile export, glutathione depletion, phospholipidosis due to inhibition of phospholipases, and hypersensitivity. Clinicopathologically, chlorpromazine toxicity manifests in approximately 1 in 100 patients typically 1–5 weeks after starting treatment and presents as self-limited jaundice, often in combination with eosinophilia. Most patients recover within weeks after discontinuation of treatment but few can experience progression of cholestatic injury to hepatic ductopenia. Toxicity of chlorpromazine was reported to be caused by its 7-hydroxylated metabolite, whereas the sulfoxidized metabolite appeared less toxic. PHH spheroids exhibited the highest sensitivity toward chlorpromazine and detected toxicity already at therapeutic concentrations, which was paralleled by increased expression of CYP1A1 and CYP1A2, as previously reported. Furthermore, expression of genes with importance for bile acid synthesis [e.g., CYP7A1, which catalyzes the rate-limiting step in the classic bile acid synthesis pathway] and bile transport [e.g., the canalicular transporter BSEP (encoded by ABCB11) and the sinusoidal transporters NTCP (SLC10A1) and OCT1 (SLC22A1)] were strongly downregulated, mirroring expression alterations seen in patients with cholestasis in vivo. Interestingly, transcriptional changes indicative of chlorpromazine-induced cholestasis preceded cytotoxicity by 2 weeks, suggesting the potential of the spheroid system to aid biomarker discovery.
The thiazolidinedione troglitazone is a PPARγ agonist used as an insulin sensitizer for treatment of diabetes that also exhibits weak affinity to PPARα. Troglitazone received regulatory approval in 1997 but was withdrawn from the US market in 2000 due to idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity. Troglitazone causes parent compound–mediated steatosis by inhibition of long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase and opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore. In addition to parent compound toxicity, troglitazone metabolites, primarily troglitazone sulfate, can cause cholestatic liver injury by inhibition of BSEP, with an IC50 of 0.4 µM. Furthermore, reactive metabolites and oxidative stress have been implicated in troglitazone toxicity, although their role remains controversial (comprehensively discussed in ). The high sensitivity across models is consistent with troglitazone toxicity being largely caused by the parent compound itself. Nevertheless, toxicity in PHH spheroids is enhanced compared with the other two models, potentially due to additive effects of toxic metabolites such as troglitazone sulfate.
Notably, previous studies have demonstrated improved phenotypes, functionality, and sensitivity to various hepatotoxins in spheroid culture systems of hepatic cell lines, stem cell–derived HLCs, and primary hepatocytes from rats and humans. Yet toxicity in most of these studies was only tested under short-term exposure and was only detected at elevated concentrations (Table 2). Furthermore, whether the mechanisms of compound toxicity were recapitulated in vitro was not evaluated. Our study reinforces the positive effects of 3D culture on expression levels of hepatic genes and provides evidence that spheroids from PHHs can recapitulate human in vivo toxicity mechanisms in an in vitro setting.
Combined, the data presented here suggest that cytotoxicity studies in which long-term treatment regimens are employed improve the sensitivity of diverse hepatic in vitro models. PHH spheroids in particular were found to be the model that most accurately reflected in vivo expression signatures in the human liver. Consequently, 3D cultured PHHs were the most sensitive system to detect drug hepatotoxicity at clinically relevant concentrations. Furthermore, our results show that the 3D spheroid system faithfully reproduced transcriptional toxicity responses observed in human livers in vivo, particularly for drugs that require metabolic activation, act via reactive oxygen species, or inhibit bile flow. Thus, development and characterization of the 3D PHH spheroid model constitutes a promising step toward a much-needed physiologically replicative system that is mechanistically predictive of human drug response.
References 87
- 1.
Anderson N Borlak J (2006 ) Drug-induced phospholipidosis. FEBS Lett 580:5533–5540.
Not in our library10.1016/j.febslet.2006.08.061
- 2.
Anthérieu S Rogue A Fromenty B Guillouzo A Robin MA (2011 ) Induction of vesicular steatosis by amiodarone and tetracycline is associated with up-regulation of lipogenic genes in HepaRG cells. Hepatology 53:1895–1905.
Not in our library10.1002/hep.24290
- 3.
Ayd FJ Jr (1956 ) The dermatologic and systemic manifestations of chlorpromazine hypersensitivity; their clinical significance and management. J Nerv Ment Dis 124:84–87.
Not in our library10.1097/00005053-195607000-00013
- 4.
Bates DW Spell N Cullen DJ Burdick E Laird N Petersen LA Small SD Sweitzer BJ Leape LL Adverse Drug Events Prevention Study Group (1997 ) The costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. JAMA 277:307–311.
Not in our library
- 5.
- 6.
Björnsson ES Bergmann OM Björnsson HK Kvaran RB Olafsson S (2013 ) Incidence, presentation, and outcomes in patients with drug-induced liver injury in the general population of Iceland. Gastroenterology 144:1419–1425.
Not in our library10.1053/j.gastro.2013.02.006
- 7.
Bradley JD Brandt KD Katz BP Kalasinski LA Ryan SI (1991 ) Comparison of an antiinflammatory dose of ibuprofen, an analgesic dose of ibuprofen, and acetaminophen in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med 325:87–91.
Not in our library10.1056/nejm199107113250203
- 8.
Chapman KL Holzgrefe H Black LE Brown M Chellman G Copeman C Couch J Creton S Gehen S Hoberman A (2013 ) Pharmaceutical toxicology: designing studies to reduce animal use, while maximizing human translation. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 66:88–103.
Not in our library10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.03.001
- 9.
Chen HL Liu YJ Chen HL Wu SH Ni YH Ho MC Lai HS Hsu WM Hsu HY Tseng HC (2008 ) Expression of hepatocyte transporters and nuclear receptors in children with early and late-stage biliary atresia. Pediatr Res 63:667–673.
Not in our library10.1203/pdr.0b013e318170a6b5
- 10.
Classen DC Pestotnik SL Evans RS Lloyd JF Burke JP (1997 ) Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. JAMA 277:301–306.
Not in our library
- 11.
Cook D Brown D Alexander R March R Morgan P Satterthwaite G Pangalos MN (2014 ) Lessons learned from the fate of AstraZeneca’s drug pipeline: a five-dimensional framework. Nat Rev Drug Discov 13:419–431.
Not in our library10.1038/nrd4309
- 12.
Elaut G Henkens T Papeleu P Snykers S Vinken M Vanhaecke T Rogiers V (2006 ) Molecular mechanisms underlying the dedifferentiation process of isolated hepatocytes and their cultures. Curr Drug Metab 7:629–660.
Not in our library10.2174/138920006778017759
- 13.
Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H Stuart B Wahle B Bomann W Ahr HJ (2004 ) Characteristic expression profiles induced by genotoxic carcinogens in rat liver. Toxicol Sci 77:19–34.
Not in our library10.1093/toxsci/kfh016
- 14.
Fey SJ Wrzesinski K (2012 ) Determination of drug toxicity using 3D spheroids constructed from an immortal human hepatocyte cell line. Toxicol Sci 127:403–411.
Not in our library10.1093/toxsci/kfs122
- 15.
Fromenty B Fisch C Berson A Letteron P Larrey D Pessayre D (1990 ) Dual effect of amiodarone on mitochondrial respiration. Initial protonophoric uncoupling effect followed by inhibition of the respiratory chain at the levels of complex I and complex II. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 255:1377–1384.
Not in our library
- 16.
Fulgencio JP Kohl C Girard J Pégorier JP (1996 ) Troglitazone inhibits fatty acid oxidation and esterification, and gluconeogenesis in isolated hepatocytes from starved rats. Diabetes 45:1556–1562.
Not in our library10.2337/diab.45.11.1556
- 17.
Funk C Pantze M Jehle L Ponelle C Scheuermann G Lazendic M Gasser R (2001 ) Troglitazone-induced intrahepatic cholestasis by an interference with the hepatobiliary export of bile acids in male and female rats. Correlation with the gender difference in troglitazone sulfate formation and the inhibition of the canalicular bile salt export pump (Bsep) by troglitazone and troglitazone sulfate. Toxicology 167:83–98.
Not in our library10.1016/s0300-483x(01)00460-7
- 18.
García Rodríguez LA Ruigómez A Jick H (1997 ) A review of epidemiologic research on drug-induced acute liver injury using the general practice research data base in the United Kingdom. Pharmacotherapy 17:721–728.
Not in our library
- 19.
Geba GP Weaver AL Polis AB Dixon ME Schnitzer TJ Vioxx, Acetaminophen, Celecoxib Trial (VACT) Group (2002 ) Efficacy of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and acetaminophen in osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized trial. JAMA 287:64–71.
Not in our library10.1001/jama.287.1.64
- 20.
Gerets HHJ Tilmant K Gerin B Chanteux H Depelchin BO Dhalluin S Atienzar FA (2012 ) Characterization of primary human hepatocytes, HepG2 cells, and HepaRG cells at the mRNA level and CYP activity in response to inducers and their predictivity for the detection of human hepatotoxins. Cell Biol Toxicol 28:69–87.
Not in our library10.1007/s10565-011-9208-4
- 21.
Gómez-Lechón MJ Tolosa L Conde I Donato MT (2014 ) Competency of different cell models to predict human hepatotoxic drugs. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 10:1553–1568.
Not in our library10.1517/17425255.2014.967680
- 22.
Gunness P Mueller D Shevchenko V Heinzle E Ingelman-Sundberg M Noor F (2013 ) 3D organotypic cultures of human HepaRG cells: a tool for in vitro toxicity studies. Toxicol Sci 133:67–78.
Not in our library10.1093/toxsci/kft021
- 23.
Hakkola J Raunio H Purkunen R Saarikoski S Vähäkangas K Pelkonen O Edwards RJ Boobis AR Pasanen M (2001 ) Cytochrome P450 3A expression in the human fetal liver: evidence that CYP3A5 is expressed in only a limited number of fetal livers. Biol Neonate 80:193–201.
Not in our library10.1159/000047142
- 24.
Hamamoto R Furukawa Y Morita M Iimura Y Silva FP Li M Yagyu R Nakamura Y (2004 ) SMYD3 encodes a histone methyltransferase involved in the proliferation of cancer cells. Nat Cell Biol 6:731–740.
Not in our library10.1038/ncb1151
- 25.
Hassan AM Sheashaa HA Abdel Fatah MF Ibrahim AZ Gaber OA (2006 ) Does aflatoxin as an environmental mycotoxin adversely affect the renal and hepatic functions of Egyptian lactating mothers and their infants? A preliminary report. Int Urol Nephrol 38:339–342.
Not in our library10.1007/s11255-006-0056-8
- 26.
Heslop JA Rowe C Walsh J Sison-Young R Jenkins R Kamalian L Kia R Hay D Jones RP Malik HZ (2017 ) Mechanistic evaluation of primary human hepatocyte culture using global proteomic analysis reveals a selective dedifferentiation profile. Arch Toxicol 91:439–452.
Not in our library10.1007/s00204-016-1694-y
- 27.
Horikawa M Kato Y Tyson CA Sugiyama Y (2003 ) Potential cholestatic activity of various therapeutic agents assessed by bile canalicular membrane vesicles isolated from rats and humans. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 18:16–22.
Not in our library10.2133/dmpk.18.16
- 28.
Johnson WW Guengerich FP (1997 ) Reaction of aflatoxin B1 exo-8,9-epoxide with DNA: kinetic analysis of covalent binding and DNA-induced hydrolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:6121–6125.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.94.12.6121
- 29.
Jossé R Dumont J Fautrel A Robin MA Guillouzo A (2012 ) Identification of early target genes of aflatoxin B1 in human hepatocytes, inter-individual variability and comparison with other genotoxic compounds. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 258:176–187.
Not in our library10.1016/j.taap.2011.10.019
- 30.
Kaplowitz N (2005 ) Idiosyncratic drug hepatotoxicity. Nat Rev Drug Discov 4:489–499.
Not in our library10.1038/nrd1750
- 31.
Kenne K Skanberg I Glinghammar B Berson A Pessayre D Flinois JP Beaune P Edebert I Pohl CD Carlsson S (2008 ) Prediction of drug-induced liver injury in humans by using in vitro methods: the case of ximelagatran. Toxicol In Vitro 22:730–746.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tiv.2007.11.014
- 32.
Kennedy JA Unger SA Horowitz JD (1996 ) Inhibition of carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1 in rat heart and liver by perhexiline and amiodarone. Biochem Pharmacol 52:273–280.
Not in our library10.1016/0006-2952(96)00204-3
- 33.
Kia R Sison RLC Heslop J Kitteringham NR Hanley N Mills JS Park BK Goldring CEP (2013 ) Stem cell-derived hepatocytes as a predictive model for drug-induced liver injury: are we there yet? Br J Clin Pharmacol 75:885–896.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04360.x
- 34.
Klein S Mueller D Schevchenko V Noor F (2014 ) Long-term maintenance of HepaRG cells in serum-free conditions and application in a repeated dose study. J Appl Toxicol 34:1078–1086.
Not in our library10.1002/jat.2929
- 35.
Krenkel O Mossanen JC Tacke F (2014 ) Immune mechanisms in acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 3:331–343.
Not in our library10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2014.11.01
- 36.
Lasser KE Allen PD Woolhandler SJ Himmelstein DU Wolfe SM Bor DH (2002 ) Timing of new black box warnings and withdrawals for prescription medications. JAMA 287:2215–2220.
Not in our library10.1001/jama.287.17.2215
- 37.
Lauschke VM Hendriks DFG Bell CC Andersson TB Ingelman-Sundberg M (2016 a) Novel 3D culture systems for studies of human liver function and assessments of the hepatotoxicity of drugs and drug candidates. Chem Res Toxicol 29:1936–1955.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00150
- 38.
Lauschke VM Ingelman-Sundberg M (2016 ) The importance of patient-specific factors for hepatic drug response and toxicity. Int J Mol Sci 17:1714–1727.
Not in our library10.3390/ijms17101714
- 39.
Lauschke VM Mkrtchian S Ingelman-Sundberg M (2016 b) The role of microRNAs in liver injury at the crossroad between hepatic cell death and regeneration. Biochem Biophys Res Commun DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.10.084 [published ahead of print].
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.10.084
- 40.
Lauschke VM Vorrink SU Moro SM Rezayee F Nordling Å Hendriks DF Bell CC Sison-Young R Park BK Goldring CE (2016 c) Massive rearrangements of cellular microRNA signatures are key drivers of hepatocyte dedifferentiation. Hepatology 64:1743–1756.
Not in our library10.1002/hep.28780
Cited by papers we hold 3
- Mechanism of baricitinib supports artificial intelligence‐predicted testing in COVID‐19 patients · 2020No notice
- Prediction of Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity Using Long-Term Stable Primary Hepatic 3D Spheroid Cultures in Chemically Defined Conditions · 2018No notice
- Endogenous and xenobiotic metabolic stability of primary human hepatocytes in long‐term 3D spheroid cultures revealed by a combination of targeted and untargeted metabolomics · 2017No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.