Skip to content
naulon
Get started

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 26, 2026.

Strategies for minimizing muscle loss during use of incretin‐mimetic drugs for treatment of obesity

Jeffrey I. Mechanick, W. Scott Butsch, Sandra M. Christensen and 4 more

Obesity Reviews · 2024 · Review · CC BY

doi:10.1111/obr.13841

Abstract

Summary The rapid and widespread clinical adoption of highly effective incretin‐mimetic drugs (IMDs), particularly semaglutide and tirzepatide, for the treatment of obesity has outpaced the updating of clinical practice guidelines. Consequently, many patients may be at risk for adverse effects and uncertain long‐term outcomes related to the use of these drugs. Of emerging concern is the loss of skeletal muscle mass and function that can accompany rapid substantial weight reduction; such losses can lead to reduced functional and metabolic health, weight cycling, compromised quality of life, and other adverse outcomes. Available evidence suggests that clinical trial participants receiving IMDs for the treatment of obesity lost 10% or more of their muscle mass during the 68‐ to 72‐week interventions, approximately equivalent to 20 years of age‐related muscle loss. The ability to maintain muscle mass during caloric restriction‐induced weight reduction is influenced by two key factors: nutrition and physical exercise. Nutrition therapy should ensure adequate intake and absorption of high‐quality protein and micronutrients, which may require the use of oral nutritional supplements. Additionally, concurrent physical activity, especially resistance training, has been shown to effectively minimize loss of muscle mass and function during weight reduction therapy. All patients receiving IMDs for obesity should participate in comprehensive treatment programs emphasizing adequate protein and micronutrient intakes, as well as resistance training, to preserve muscle mass and function, maximize the benefit of IMD therapy, and minimize potential risks.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 26, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

INTRODUCTION

There has been a dramatic increase in the use of the GLP‐1 (glucagon‐like peptide‐1) receptor agonists semaglutide and liraglutide, and the GLP‐1/glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor co‐agonist tirzepatide to treat obesity after clinical trials showed that semaglutide and tirzepatide were highly effective for weight reduction and after FDA approval for obesity., The rapid clinical adoption of these and other incretin‐mimetic drugs (IMDs) for obesity treatment has outpaced the ability of professional medical societies to update clinical practice guidelines. Consequently, important considerations for the use of IMDs, including management of side effects, may receive inadequate attention in the clinic, leaving patients exposed to potential adverse effects and uncertain long‐term outcomes. An emerging concern is loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, an effect that can lead to reduced functional and metabolic health, weight regain or weight cycling, compromised quality of life, and other adverse outcomes., Available evidence provides limited information about preventing or reversing muscle loss associated with the use of IMDs. The goal of this paper is to examine the issue of muscle loss and outline clinical strategies for minimizing the loss of muscle mass and function in people using IMDs for the treatment of obesity. The paper is based on a 1‐day scientific roundtable meeting in August 2023 attended by each of the authors.

Muscle loss in people with obesity

Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 and GIP are hormones that exert an incretin effect, in which an oral glucose load induces a stronger insulin response than an isoglycemic intravenous glucose load. Similar to endogenous incretin hormones, IMDs have pleiotropic effects on the gastrointestinal tract, the central nervous system, and other organ systems. In general, IMDs have a significant effect on the regulation of body weight by suppressing appetite and slowing gastric emptying. It is widely recognized that restricted caloric intake leading to weight reduction is usually accompanied by loss of muscle mass and that such loss can be detrimental., Thus, steps to monitor and minimize loss of muscle mass and function are essential components of a comprehensive obesity treatment program.

The central goals of obesity treatment are long‐term reduction of excess and abnormal adiposity, as well as complications associated with excess body weight, such as cardiovascular disease (Figure 1)., Unfortunately, most patients who use anti‐obesity medications, including IMDs, for this purpose regain much of their former weight after stopping therapy., Specifically, at the end of the weight reduction phase, most patients will have lower energy expenditure owing to various adaptations, including lower muscle mass, reduced basal metabolic rate, and possibly improved muscle efficiency (Figure 2). Because muscle is more metabolically active than adipose tissue, reductions in muscle mass lead to reduced energy expenditure and consequently reduced energy deficit, rendering weight maintenance more difficult. Furthermore, it is likely the body weight regained after stopping treatment is disproportionately composed of adipose tissue, with little regain of lean mass and little increase in energy expenditure., This process can lead to weight cycling, which is particularly common in young and middle‐aged women (<60 years), who are also the most common type of patients seeking obesity treatment. Severe weight cycling is associated with an increased risk of muscle loss and sarcopenic obesity,, which has been reported in as many as 20% of young women (≥18 years of age) seeking obesity treatment.

On average, people with obesity have a higher absolute skeletal muscle mass and strength than those with a normal weight, especially in weight‐bearing muscles.,, However, a substantial percentage of people with obesity have low muscle mass. Furthermore, when muscle strength is normalized to body weight, it is lower in people living with obesity. Another factor is that prediabetes and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are common in people with obesity, and T2D is associated with lower muscle mass and more rapid age‐related declines in muscle mass.,,, In addition, it is widely recognized that excess and abnormal adiposity has detrimental effects on muscle strength and structure, as well as cardiovascular disease, due to multiple mechanisms, including myosteatosis.,,

Low muscle mass is often unrecognized and is independently associated with increased risk of mortality and morbidity, reduced quality of life, increased risk of T2D, and other adverse health outcomes.,,,, A recent study estimated that 15.9% of the US adult population (≥20 years old) had obesity with low muscle mass, representing almost 30 million people. These individuals—and especially women and those with T2D, prediabetes, or metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)—are already at high risk of sarcopenia (age‐related loss of skeletal muscle function and mass),, sarcopenic obesity (the co‐existence of excess adiposity and low muscle mass/function, which can occur at any age), and the serious negative health outcomes accompanying those conditions (Figure 3).,,,,

Muscle loss in phase 3 trials of IMDs for treatment of obesity

Interpretation of muscle loss in phase 3 trials of IMDs necessitates a clear understanding of body composition terminology and its application. According to precise definitions, lean mass includes lean soft tissues, not bone mass (Figure 4). Fat‐free mass, in contrast, includes the sum of lean mass and bone mass. Unfortunately, the terms “lean mass” and “fat‐free mass” are often mistakenly used interchangeably, which ignores these critical distinctions. Compounding this issue, many studies fail to explain dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) methods in sufficient detail, making it challenging to determine which body composition compartment is being assessed and whether the terminology is used accurately.

In a pivotal trial of semaglutide for the treatment of obesity (Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity‐1; STEP‐1), a subset of participants had body composition analyzed by DXA before and at the end of the 68‐week treatment period (see supplementary appendix in Wilding et al.). In the semaglutide‐treated (2.4 mg once weekly) group, body weight was reduced by an average of 17.32 kg during the treatment period (vs. 2.65 kg in the placebo group); this included a 6.92‐kg mean reduction in total lean mass (vs. 1.48 kg in the placebo group). Thus, in the semaglutide group, 40% of the reduction in body weight was due to a reduction in lean mass. Perhaps more importantly, 6.92 kg represents 13.2% of the average total lean mass at baseline (52.4 kg). Although muscle usually accounts for about one‐half of lean mass, it is not possible to determine from this publication the actual proportion of lean mass that was muscle versus other non‐fat tissues such as the liver, heart, and other organs and tissues. However, it is reasonable to conclude that muscle loss accounted for at least half of the reduction in lean mass during the STEP‐1 trial.,, On this basis, a conservative estimate is that participants in the semaglutide group lost at least 10% of their muscle mass during the 68‐week treatment period.

In a pivotal trial of tirzepatide (Study of Tirzepatide in Participants with Obesity of Overweight; SURMOUNT‐1) for obesity, a subset of participants also had body composition analyzed by DXA before and at the end of the 72‐week treatment period (see supplementary appendix in Jastreboff et al.). In the pooled tirzepatide‐treated (5, 10, or 15 mg once weekly) DXA subgroup, participants lost 10.9% of their lean mass during the treatment period. However, in the overall trial, tirzepatide‐treated patients lost 15% to 20.9% of their body weight. On a percentage basis, the loss of lean mass was similar to that reported among the semaglutide‐treated participants in the STEP‐1 trial. The estimated loss of skeletal muscle in these two major trials (10% or more during 68–72 weeks of treatment) approximates the average decline in muscle mass during 20 years of aging‐related muscle loss in adults older than 30 years, estimated at 3%–5% per decade (Figure 5).

In earlier studies of modest weight reduction by non‐pharmacologic caloric restriction, declines in lean mass typically accounted for 10%–30% of the total body weight reduction. However, this percentage is not a constant and is expected to trend higher in people rapidly experiencing large weight reductions, as observed after bariatric surgery. It can also vary by sex, race, ethnicity, physical activity level, and other variables., Although participants in the active‐treatment groups of the STEP‐1 and SURMOUNT‐1 trials experienced proportionately large declines in lean mass, those declines may be consistent with declines in lean mass expected in people experiencing large weight reductions. Or they could be due to characteristics of participants enrolled in the trials or other trial‐related factors. In the absence of additional studies or analyses, it is premature to speculate that the observed declines in lean mass were due to anything other than reduced caloric intake and possibly inadequate intake of specific macro‐ or micronutrients (in the context of low levels of physical activity).

Available evidence suggests that IMD therapy has beneficial effects on muscle structure and function in animal models and humans.,,,,,,,,, It is unclear whether those effects are sufficient to counteract the loss of muscle mass seen in clinical trials. However, there is evidence that exercise has beneficial effects when added to IMD therapy or to weight reduction induced by caloric restriction.,, It could be a decade or more before long‐term follow‐up studies evaluate the long‐term risk of sarcopenia or sarcopenic obesity associated with IMD therapy. Given the existing elevated risk in people with obesity, and taking into account current research gaps, efforts to minimize that risk should be a routine part of current obesity care.

PRESERVING MUSCLE MASS AND FUNCTION DURING IMD THERAPY FOR OBESITY

Although IMDs have pleiotropic effects, studies have demonstrated that reduced caloric intake accounts for much of their weight‐reducing effect when used for the treatment of obesity.,, It is often unrecognized that many people living with obesity have inadequate intake of protein and essential micronutrients.,, Therefore, the reduced caloric intake during IMD therapy may exacerbate pre‐existing nutritional deficits essential for the maintenance of muscle mass and function. Indeed, reduced muscle mass is now recognized as a phenotypic criterion for the diagnosis of malnutrition by the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition and is also a defining characteristic of sarcopenia and frailty. If such nutritional deficits are accompanied by low levels of physical activity or a history of weight cycling, patients are at even greater risk of losing muscle mass and strength during IMD treatment. Thus, in the setting of obesity treatment with IMDs, preservation of muscle mass should be viewed as a key goal that parallels the goals of reducing adiposity and weight‐related complications (Figure 6). This principle is affirmed in the European consensus on the definition and diagnosis of sarcopenia.,

Nutrition

Adequate nutrition is essential for the maintenance of muscle mass. Comprehensive obesity guidelines provide clear recommendations regarding macronutrient intake, a personalized approach to nutrition, and a comprehensive approach to management.,,, As noted in several guidelines, individualized nutrition education and medical nutrition therapy from a registered dietitian (RD) should be offered as core components of any obesity treatment plan.,,, If an RD is not accessible, the prescribing clinic should provide nutrition education and support.

In the setting of caloric restriction associated with IMD therapy, many patients may have inadequate protein intake. Thus, protein intake should be monitored to ensure it is adequate. Currently, the Institute of Medicine Recommended Dietary Allowance for protein in healthy people is 0.8 g/kg body weight/day. Higher amounts have been recommended for healthy people older than 65 years (1.2–1.5 g/kg body weight). Guidelines for the management of patients after bariatric surgery recommend a minimal protein intake of 60 g/day and up to 1.5 g/kg ideal body weight. Clinical nutrition guidelines from the Joslin Diabetes Center recommend protein intake of 1.0–1.5 g/kg of adjusted body weight, in which adjusted body weight is ideal body weight plus 0.25 × excess body weight. Protein intake should be adapted to meet the individual needs of each patient.,,, Furthermore, protein quality (as reflected by the content of essential amino acids and protein digestibility) affects the ability of dietary protein to support muscle protein synthesis. Thus, nutrition education and support should include individualized guidance on how patients can incorporate high‐quality protein sources in their diet.

Still unclear is the role of protein supplementation beyond recommended levels as a stand‐alone intervention to preserve muscle mass during caloric restriction or during maintenance of a reduced body weight. Studies addressing this issue have had mixed results, and many study designs make it difficult to apply the results to specific patient types such as people living with obesity on calorie‐restricted diets., There are no current guidelines that recommend protein supplementation for these purposes beyond ensuring adequate protein intake on an individual basis.

Recent micronutrient guidelines emphasize that an adequate supply of all essential trace elements and vitamins (micronutrients) is essential for the metabolism of foods supplying protein and energy. Unfortunately, an analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data suggests that more than 40% of US adults have inadequate intake of micronutrients. The recent micronutrient guidelines provide detailed information about the signs of micronutrient deficiency as well as how to assess and correct micronutrient levels. Another set of guidelines addressing nutrition after bariatric surgery also provides a reasonable template for a clinical approach to this issue.

IMD therapy for obesity is associated with reduced appetite, temporary food aversion, and changes in taste preferences, especially during the initial stages of therapy. If patients receiving IMD therapy are unable to maintain a diet containing sufficient high‐quality protein and micronutrients, oral nutritional supplements (ONS) may be an effective and scalable option. With guidance from the clinical team, these products can be integrated into a comprehensive obesity treatment plan without undermining weight reduction efforts., ONS provide protein, energy, and micronutrients for people who are not meeting their nutrition needs by food alone, and some are formulated with ingredients intended to support muscle health, as discussed in detail elsewhere. Use of ONS products is supported by extensive research and clinical guidelines.,, Note that dietary supplements are distinct from ONS and typically provide only specified types and amounts of individual nutrients, and they often have less research supporting their efficacy and safety.,,, Several randomized controlled trials have shown beneficial effects of ONS products on functional outcomes in various clinical scenarios,,, including significantly better leg strength in older (≥65 years), community‐dwelling adults at risk of malnutrition. Ongoing trials are evaluating the role of ONS to support muscle health in people with obesity.

Physical activity

Both aerobic exercise and resistance training are widely recommended as essential components of a comprehensive obesity care plan.,,, Some guidelines recognize that resistance training can promote the maintenance of muscle mass and function during weight reduction therapy and promote weight maintenance after cessation of weight reduction therapy.,, In addition, several systematic reviews and meta‐analyses concluded that resistance training was effective for maintaining muscle mass during caloric restriction in people with overweight or obesity.,,, Another systematic review found similar results after bariatric surgery. These results are also supported by a randomized clinical trial of older adults living with frailty or reduced muscle mass induced by weight reduction. A study of maintenance therapy after low‐calorie weight reduction showed that exercise in combination with IMD therapy is associated with greater loss of adiposity and improvements in glycemic parameters and cardiorespiratory fitness versus IMD therapy alone or exercise alone. Furthermore, a long‐term follow‐up study of people with obesity who were treated with an IMD has shown that discontinuation of therapy was accompanied by weight regain as well as the return of cardiometabolic risk factors (e.g., high blood pressure and prediabetes). However, evidence suggests that when IMD therapy is accompanied by supervised exercise, those adverse effects occurring after treatment discontinuation can be attenuated.

A program of physical activity that includes resistance training should take into account numerous patient‐specific factors including age, baseline fitness level, nutritional status, existing cardiovascular disease or risk factors, joint health and overall mobility, respiratory health, other comorbidities, medications, patient preferences, access to fitness equipment or resources, patient motivation, and psychological factors., Guidance on the development of individualized goals and physical activity programs can be found in guidelines from the American College of Sports Medicine and the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans., The latter guidelines recommend at least 150–300 min per week of moderate‐intensity exercise or 75–150 min of vigorous‐intensity exercise as well as muscle‐strengthening activities on two or more days per week. It also notes the importance of working all the major muscle groups: legs, hips, back, abdomen, chest, shoulders, and arms. A practical consideration for developing resistance training plans is that muscle loss during weight reduction may affect some muscles more than others, and this effect may depend on the person's sex and age.

A related question is whether a high‐protein diet increases the benefit of resistance training with respect to preserving muscle mass during caloric restriction in people with obesity. Several trials, systemic reviews, and meta‐analyses have addressed this question, but most of them studied older adults or people without obesity.,,, Because physical activity increases muscle protein synthesis, it is likely to increase protein needs. At the least, available studies reinforce the importance of maintaining adequate protein intake during caloric restriction in people with obesity. Other advantages of higher protein intake in this setting include increased satiety and energy expenditure, both of which contribute to weight reduction and maintenance of lower weight. Fortuitously, the two key strategies for preserving muscle mass and function during caloric restriction—nutrition and physical exercise—also have beneficial effects on bone,,, potentially reducing the risk for osteosarcopenic obesity.

Skeletal muscle also functions as an endocrine organ. Muscle contraction during exercise triggers the release of numerous autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine mediators collectively known as myokines. These humoral factors have been shown to have beneficial effects on cognition, lipid and glucose metabolism, adipocyte function, bone structure, endothelial function, immune function, and skin structure. Though human research on this topic is limited, preclinical studies suggest that loss of muscle mass or function can detrimentally affect numerous physiological systems.

ASSESSING MUSCLE MASS AND FUNCTION

Assessment of body composition (lean/muscle mass and fat mass) and muscle function can provide useful information to guide the clinical management of obesity.,, A summary of currently available methods is shown in Table 1. The most accurate and reliable methods for assessing body composition (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], computed tomography [CT], and DXA) have limited availability in outpatient settings and relatively high costs. Although they should not replace the measurement of muscle mass, muscle function tests can be used as part of initial screening for suspected sarcopenic obesity (Figure 7). Declines in muscle function may be more evident than declines in muscle mass., Currently, there is a critical need for studies exploring and validating how the results of body composition tests should guide clinical decision‐making during IMD therapy. For example, diagnostic cutoffs for many muscle function tests were developed and validated in older people and may not be applicable or accurate in younger populations.

PROSPECTS FOR THE FUTURE

Low muscle mass is a common and adverse feature of numerous diseases and conditions including obesity, sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, malnutrition, frailty, cardiovascular disease, T2D, and cachexia. Thus, there is considerable research interest in developing treatments to prevent muscle loss or wasting, including efforts focusing on adults with overweight or obesity. A recent study, for example, supports the concept of combining liraglutide therapy for obesity with exercise to improve the maintenance of weight reduction and metabolic parameters., Effects on muscle mass remain to be explored, especially when exercise is combined with the greater weight reduction induced by more effective anti‐obesity IMDs. Other studies are exploring selective androgen receptor modulators or specific nutritional strategies intended to support muscle preservation including ingredients such as protein, amino acids, or β‐hydroxy‐β‐methylbutyrate (HMB), often as part of more complete ONS. Finally, recent studies and ongoing research support the promise of targeting alternative signaling pathways for treating obesity. For example, recent evidence suggests that agents targeting myostatin/activin signaling pathways may be able to effect reductions in adiposity while preserving or even increasing muscle mass.,

CONCLUSIONS

During IMD therapy for obesity, preserving muscle mass and function is an essential treatment goal alongside reducing excess and abnormal adiposity. Two key principles for preserving muscle mass are (1) ensuring adequate intake of protein and other nutrients and (2) incorporating physical activity—specifically resistance training—into a comprehensive obesity treatment plan. ONS can counteract or prevent nutrient deficiencies and help patients maintain a balanced diet, especially in patients experiencing reduced appetite or food aversion. These nutritional strategies should be designed to provide patients with a targeted nutritional intervention without contributing to excessive caloric intake. These goals and principles reinforce the importance of patients having access to healthcare professionals who can offer evidence‐based guidance on nutrition and physical activity.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

This paper emerged from a scientific roundtable meeting in which all authors participated. The first draft was written by the medical writer on the basis of presentations and discussion at the scientific roundtable. All authors reviewed and revised the text and approved the final draft.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

JIM has received honoraria from Abbott Nutrition for lectures and serves on advisory boards for Abbott Nutrition, Aveta.Life, and Twin Health. WSB has received honoraria and/or paid consultancy from Novo Nordisk, Abbott Nutrition, Medscape, Alfie Health, and Med Learning Group. SMC has received honoraria and/or paid consultancy from Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, and Abbott Nutrition. OH has received research support from Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk and serves on an advisory board for Abbott Nutrition. ZL attended the Abbott Nutrition Scientific Roundtable meeting. CMP has received honoraria and/or paid consultancy from Abbott Nutrition, Nutricia, Nestlé Health Science, Pfizer, and AMRA medical and investigator‐initiated grant funding from Almased. SBH has received honoria/paid consultancy from Medifast Corporation, Abbott Nutrition, Tanita Corporation, Novo Nordisk, Versanis, and Amgen.

ROLE OF THE FUNDER/SPONSOR

Abbott Nutrition Health Institute funded the scientific roundtable meeting and manuscript preparation. Authors were reimbursed for the costs of attending the meeting but received no fee or honorarium for their role in the preparation of the manuscript. Abbott Nutrition employees did not influence the content or opinions expressed in the paper.

References 120

  1. 1.

    Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, et al. Once‐weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(11):989‐1002

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2032183

  2. 2.

    Jastreboff AM, Aronne LJ, Ahmad NN, et al. Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(3):205‐216

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2206038

  3. 3.

    Prado CM, Purcell SA, Alish C, et al. Implications of low muscle mass across the continuum of care: a narrative review. Ann Med. 2018;50(8):675‐693

    Not in our library10.1080/07853890.2018.1511918

  4. 4.

    Prado CM, Landi F, Chew STH, et al. Advances in muscle health and nutrition: a toolkit for healthcare professionals. Clin Nutr. 2022;41(10):2244‐2263

    Not in our library10.1016/j.clnu.2022.07.041

  5. 5.

    Nauck MA, Quast DR, Wefers J, Pfeiffer AFH. The evolving story of incretins (GIP and GLP‐1) in metabolic and cardiovascular disease: a pathophysiological update. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021;23(Suppl 3):5‐29

    Not in our library10.1111/dom.14496

  6. 6.

    Chaston TB, Dixon JB, O'Brien PE. Changes in fat‐free mass during significant weight loss: a systematic review. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007;31(5):743‐750

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.ijo.0803483

  7. 7.

    Prado CM, Wells JC, Smith SR, Stephan BC, Siervo M. Sarcopenic obesity: a critical appraisal of the current evidence. Clin Nutr. 2012;31(5):583‐601

    Not in our library10.1016/j.clnu.2012.06.010

  8. 8.

    Mechanick JI, Farkouh ME, Newman JD, Garvey WT. Cardiometabolic‐based chronic disease, adiposity and dysglycemia drivers: JACC state‐of‐the‐art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(5):525‐538

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.044

  9. 9.

    Conte C, Hall KD, Klein S. Is weight loss‐induced muscle mass loss clinically relevant? JAMA. 2024;332(1):9‐10

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.2024.6586

  10. 10.

    Apovian CM, Aronne LJ, Bessesen DH, et al. Pharmacological management of obesity: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(2):342‐362

    Not in our library10.1210/jc.2014-3415

  11. 11.
    Weight regain and cardiometabolic effects after withdrawal of semaglutide: The STEP 1 trial extension · 2022
    No notice
  12. 12.

    Müller MJ, Enderle J, Pourhassan M, et al. Metabolic adaptation to caloric restriction and subsequent refeeding: the Minnesota starvation experiment revisited. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102(4):807‐819

    Not in our library10.3945/ajcn.115.109173

  13. 13.

    Müller MJ, Heymsfield SB, Bosy‐Westphal A. Changes in body composition and homeostatic control of resting energy expenditure during dietary weight loss. Obes (Silver Spring). 2023;31(4):892‐895

    Not in our library10.1002/oby.23703

  14. 14.

    Pownall HJ, Bray GA, Wagenknecht LE, et al. Changes in body composition over 8 years in a randomized trial of a lifestyle intervention: the look AHEAD study. Obes (Silver Spring). 2015;23(3):565‐572

    Not in our library10.1002/oby.21005

  15. 15.

    Rossi AP, Rubele S, Calugi S, et al. Weight cycling as a risk factor for low muscle mass and strength in a population of males and females with obesity. Obes (Silver Spring). 2019;27(7):1068‐1075

    Not in our library10.1002/oby.22493

  16. 16.

    Pellegrini M, Itani L, Rossi AP, et al. Approaching sarcopenic obesity in young and middle‐aged female adults in weight management settings: a narrative review. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10(10)

    Not in our library10.3390/healthcare10102042

  17. 17.

    Bays HE, Golden A, Tondt J. Thirty obesity myths, misunderstandings, and/or oversimplifications: an Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) 2022. Obes Pillars. 2022;3:100034

    Not in our library10.1016/j.obpill.2022.100034

  18. 18.
    Association between Sarcopenic Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes, and Hypertension in Overweight and Obese Treatment-Seeking Adult Women · 2018
    Not checked
  19. 19.
    The impact of obesity on skeletal muscle strength and structure through adolescence to old age · 2015
    No notice
  20. 20.

    Heymsfield SB, Smith B, Chung EA, et al. Phenotypic differences between people varying in muscularity. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022;13(2):1100‐1112

    Not in our library10.1002/jcsm.12959

  21. 21.

    Murdock DJ, Wu N, Grimsby JS, et al. The prevalence of low muscle mass associated with obesity in the USA. Skelet Muscle. 2022;12(1):26

    Not in our library10.1186/s13395-022-00309-5

  22. 22.
    The Association Between Diabetes Mellitus and Risk of Sarcopenia: Accumulated Evidences From Observational Studies · 2021
    Not checked
  23. 23.

    Feng L, Gao Q, Hu K, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of sarcopenia in patients with diabetes: a meta‐analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(5):1470‐1483

    Not in our library10.1210/clinem/dgab884

  24. 24.

    Dai S, Shu D, Meng F, et al. Higher risk of sarcopenia in older adults with type 2 diabetes: NHANES 1999‐2018. Obes Facts. 2023;16(3):237‐248

    Not in our library10.1159/000530241

  25. 25.

    Xu J, Han X, Chen Q, et al. Association between sarcopenia and prediabetes among non‐elderly US adults. J Endocrinol Invest. 2023;46(9):1815‐1824

    Not in our library10.1007/s40618-023-02038-y

  26. 26.

    Li CW, Yu K, Shyh‐Chang N, et al. Pathogenesis of sarcopenia and the relationship with fat mass: descriptive review. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022;13(2):781‐794

    Not in our library10.1002/jcsm.12901

  27. 27.

    Mechanick JI, Hurley DL, Garvey WT. Adiposity‐based chronic disease as a new diagnostic term: the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology position statement. Endocr Pract. 2017;23(3):372‐378

    Not in our library10.4158/ep161688.ps

  28. 28.

    Cruz‐Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):16‐31

    Not in our library10.1093/ageing/afy169

  29. 29.

    Damluji AA, Alfaraidhy M, AlHajri N, et al. Sarcopenia and cardiovascular diseases. Circulation. 2023;147(20):1534‐1553

    Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.123.064071

  30. 30.

    Dent E, Morley JE, Cruz‐Jentoft AJ, et al. International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Sarcopenia (ICFSR): screening, diagnosis and management. J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(10):1148‐1161

    Not in our library10.1007/s12603-018-1139-9

  31. 31.

    Cruz‐Jentoft AJ, Gonzalez MC, Prado CM. Sarcopenia ≠ low muscle mass. Eur Geriatr Med. 2023;14(2):225‐228

    Not in our library10.1007/s41999-023-00760-7

  32. 32.

    Donini LM, Busetto L, Bischoff SC, et al. Definition and diagnostic criteria for sarcopenic obesity: ESPEN and EASO consensus statement. Clin Nutr. 2022;41(4):990‐1000

    Not in our library10.1016/j.clnu.2021.11.014

  33. 33.

    Gao Q, Mei F, Shang Y, et al. Global prevalence of sarcopenic obesity in older adults: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(7):4633‐4641

    Not in our library10.1016/j.clnu.2021.06.009

  34. 34.

    Prado CM, Heymsfield SB. Lean tissue imaging: a new era for nutritional assessment and intervention. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014;38(8):940‐953

    Not in our library10.1177/0148607114550189

  35. 35.

    Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Calanna S, et al. Impact of semaglutide on body composition in adults with overweight or obesity: exploratory analysis of the STEP 1 study. J Endocrine Soc. 2021;5(Supplement_1):A16‐A17

    Not in our library10.1210/jendso/bvab048.030

  36. 36.

    Lee RC, Wang Z, Heo M, Ross R, Janssen I, Heymsfield SB. Total‐body skeletal muscle mass: development and cross‐validation of anthropometric prediction models. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72(3):796‐803

    Not in our library10.1093/ajcn/72.3.796

  37. 37.

    Wang Z, Heo M, Lee RC, Kotler DP, Withers RT, Heymsfield SB. Muscularity in adult humans: proportion of adipose tissue‐free body mass as skeletal muscle. Am J Hum Biol. 2001;13(5):612‐619

    Not in our library10.1002/ajhb.1099

  38. 38.

    Heymsfield SB, Yang S, McCarthy C, et al. Proportion of caloric restriction‐induced weight loss as skeletal muscle. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2024;32(1):32‐40

    Not in our library10.1002/oby.23910

  39. 39.
    Sarcopenia, Dynapenia, and the Impact of Advancing Age on Human Skeletal Muscle Size and Strength; a Quantitative Review · 2012
    No notice
  40. 40.

    Hall KD. Body fat and fat‐free mass inter‐relationships: Forbes's theory revisited. Br J Nutr. 2007;97(6):1059‐1063

    Not in our library10.1017/s0007114507691946

  41. 41.

    Heymsfield SB, Gonzalez MC, Shen W, Redman L, Thomas D. Weight loss composition is one‐fourth fat‐free mass: a critical review and critique of this widely cited rule. Obes Rev. 2014;15(4):310‐321

    Not in our library10.1111/obr.12143

  42. 42.

    Patel KV, Pandey A, Ayers C, Linge J, Leinhard OD, Joshi PH, Neeland IJ. Effect of liraglutide on muscle fat infiltration in adults with overweight or obesity: a randomized clinical trial. European Association for the Study of Diabetes Annual Meeting, 2022. 2022:Abstract #112.

    Not in our library

  43. 43.

    Linge J, Neeland IJ, Dahlqvist Leinhard O, et al. Tirzepatide achieves significant weight loss without adverse effects on muscle composition (SURPASS‐3 MRI). European Association for the Study of Diabetes Annual Meeting, 2023. 2023:Session 01 ‐ OP 01‐01.

    Not in our library

  44. 44.

    Sattar N, Linge J, Neeland IJ, et al. Tirzepatide reduces muscle fat infiltration relative to insulin deglucec in people with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS‐3 MRI). European Association for the Study of Diabetes Annual Meeting, 2023. 2023:Session 01 ‐ OP 01–02.

    Not in our library

  45. 45.

    Abdulla H, Phillips B, Wilkinson D, et al. Effects of GLP‐1 infusion upon whole‐body glucose uptake and skeletal muscle perfusion during fed‐state in older men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023;108(4):971‐978

    Not in our library10.1210/clinem/dgac613

  46. 46.

    Gurjar AA, Kushwaha S, Chattopadhyay S, et al. Long acting GLP‐1 analog liraglutide ameliorates skeletal muscle atrophy in rodents. Metabolism. 2020;103:154044

    Not in our library10.1016/j.metabol.2019.154044

  47. 47.

    Colin IM, Knoops B, Gérard AC. Incretin‐induced changes in the transcriptome of skeletal muscles of fa/fa Zucker rat (ZFR) with obesity, without diabetes. Int J Obes (Lond). 2022;46(7):1311‐1318

    Not in our library10.1038/s41366-022-01114-2

  48. 48.

    Kakegawa T, Sugimoto K, Saito K, et al. Favorable liver and skeletal muscle changes in patients with MASLD and T2DM receiving glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist: a prospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(23):e38444

    Not in our library10.1097/md.0000000000038444

  49. 49.

    Pandey A, Patel KV, Segar MW, et al. Effect of liraglutide on thigh muscle fat and muscle composition in adults with overweight or obesity: results from a randomized clinical trial. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2024;15(3):1072‐1083

    Not in our library10.1002/jcsm.13445

  50. 50.

    Ren Q, Chen S, Chen X, et al. An effective glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists, semaglutide, improves sarcopenic obesity in obese mice by modulating skeletal muscle metabolism. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2022;16:3723‐3735

    Not in our library10.2147/dddt.s381546

  51. 51.

    Tian X, Gao Y, Kong M, et al. GLP‐1 receptor agonist protects palmitate‐induced insulin resistance in skeletal muscle cells by up‐regulating sestrin2 to promote autophagy. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):9446

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-023-36602-6

  52. 52.

    Jensen SBK, Blond MB, Sandsdal RM, et al. Healthy weight loss maintenance with exercise, GLP‐1 receptor agonist, or both combined followed by one year without treatment: a post‐treatment analysis of a randomised placebo‐controlled trial. eClinicalMedicine. 2024;69:102475

    Not in our library10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102475

  53. 53.

    Garvey WT, Mechanick JI, Brett EM, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Comprehensive clinical practice guidelines for medical care of patients with obesity. Endocr Pract. 2016;22(Suppl 3):1‐203

    Not in our library10.4158/ep161365.gl

  54. 54.

    Yumuk V, Tsigos C, Fried M, et al. European guidelines for obesity management in adults. Obes Facts. 2015;8(6):402‐424

    Not in our library10.1159/000442721

  55. 55.

    Wharton S, Lau DCW, Vallis M, et al. Obesity in adults: a clinical practice guideline. CMAJ. 2020;192(31):E875‐e891

    Not in our library10.1503/cmaj.191707

  56. 56.

    Quast DR, Nauck MA, Schenker N, Menge BA, Kapitza C, Meier JJ. Macronutrient intake, appetite, food preferences and exocrine pancreas function after treatment with short‐ and long‐acting glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021;23(10):2344‐2353

    Not in our library10.1111/dom.14477

  57. 57.

    Heise T, JH DV, Urva S, et al. Tirzepatide reduces appetite, energy intake, and fat mass in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2023;46(5):998‐1004

    Not in our library10.2337/dc22-1710

  58. 58.

    Silver HJ, Olson D, Mayfield D, et al. Effect of the glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist liraglutide, compared to caloric restriction, on appetite, dietary intake, body fat distribution and cardiometabolic biomarkers: a randomized trial in adults with obesity and prediabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023;25(8):2340‐2350

    Not in our library10.1111/dom.15113

  59. 59.

    Fanelli SM, Kelly OJ, Krok‐Schoen JL, Taylor CA. Low protein intakes and poor diet quality associate with functional limitations in US adults with diabetes: a 2005‐2016 NHANES analysis. Nutrients. 2021;13(8):2582

    Not in our library10.3390/nu13082582

  60. 60.

    Krok‐Schoen JL, Archdeacon Price A, Luo M, Kelly OJ, Taylor CA. Low dietary protein intakes and associated dietary patterns and functional limitations in an aging population: a NHANES analysis. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(4):338‐347

    Not in our library10.1007/s12603-019-1174-1

  61. 61.

    Agarwal S, Reider C, Brooks JR, Fulgoni VL 3rd. Comparison of prevalence of inadequate nutrient intake based on body weight status of adults in the United States: an analysis of NHANES 2001‐2008. J Am Coll Nutr. 2015;34(2):126‐134

    Not in our library10.1080/07315724.2014.901196

  62. 62.

    Cederholm T, Jensen GL, Correia M, et al. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition—a consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(1):1‐9

    Not in our library10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.002

  63. 63.

    Landi F, Camprubi‐Robles M, Bear DE, et al. Muscle loss: the new malnutrition challenge in clinical practice. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(5):2113‐2120

    Not in our library10.1016/j.clnu.2018.11.021

  64. 64.

    Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25 Pt B):2985‐3023

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.004

  65. 65.

    Morgan‐Bathke M, Raynor HA, Baxter SD, et al. Medical nutrition therapy interventions provided by dietitians for adult overweight and obesity management: an academy of nutrition and dietetics evidence‐based practice guideline. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2023;123(3):520‐545.e510

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jand.2022.11.014

  66. 66.

    Institute of Medicine. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrates, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, and amino acids. The National Academies Press; 2005

    Not in our library10.17226/10490

  67. 67.

    Deutz NE, Bauer JM, Barazzoni R, et al. Protein intake and exercise for optimal muscle function with aging: recommendations from the ESPEN Expert Group. Clin Nutr. 2014;33(6):929‐936

    Not in our library10.1016/j.clnu.2014.04.007

  68. 68.

    Mechanick JI, Apovian C, Brethauer S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures—2019 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(2):175‐247

    Not in our library10.1016/j.soard.2019.10.025

  69. 69.

    Hamdy O, Ganda OP, Maryniuk M, Gabbay RA. CHAPTER 2. Clinical nutrition guideline for overweight and obese adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) or prediabetes, or those at high risk for developing T2D. Am J Manag Care. 2018;24(7):Sp226‐sp231.

    Not in our library

  70. 70.

    Alexander L, Christensen SM, Richardson L, et al. Nutrition and physical activity: an Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement 2022. Obesity Pillars. 2022;1:100005

    Not in our library10.1016/j.obpill.2021.100005

  71. 71.

    Dekker IM, van Rijssen NM, Verreijen A, et al. Calculation of protein requirements; a comparison of calculations based on bodyweight and fat free mass. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2022;48:378‐385

    Not in our library10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.01.014

  72. 72.

    Phillips SM. The impact of protein quality on the promotion of resistance exercise‐induced changes in muscle mass. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2016;13(1):64

    Not in our library10.1186/s12986-016-0124-8

  73. 73.

    Cava E, Yeat NC, Mittendorfer B. Preserving healthy muscle during weight loss. Adv Nutr. 2017;8(3):511‐519

    Not in our library10.3945/an.116.014506

  74. 74.

    Magkos F. Protein‐rich diets for weight loss maintenance. Curr Obes Rep. 2020;9(3):213‐218

    Not in our library10.1007/s13679-020-00391-0

  75. 75.

    Berger MM, Shenkin A, Schweinlin A, et al. ESPEN micronutrient guideline. Clin Nutr. 2022;41(6):1357‐1424

    Not in our library10.1016/j.clnu.2022.02.015

  76. 76.

    Gupta V. Pleiotropic effects of incretins. Ind J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;16(Suppl1):S47‐S56

    Not in our library10.4103/2230-8210.94259

  77. 77.

    Cederholm T, Barazzoni R, Austin P, et al. ESPEN guidelines on definitions and terminology of clinical nutrition. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(1):49‐64

    Not in our library10.1016/j.clnu.2016.09.004

  78. 78.

    American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. ORAL nutrition supplements 2022; Accessed 29 October, 2023. Available from: https://www.nutritioncare.org/uploadedFiles/Documents/Guidelines_and_Clinical_Resources/EN_Resources/Oral‐Nutrition‐Supplements.pdf.

    Not in our library

  79. 79.

    Baldwin C, Smith R, Gibbs M, Weekes CE, Emery PW. Quality of the evidence supporting the role of oral nutritional supplements in the management of malnutrition: an overview of systematic reviews and meta‐analyses. Adv Nutr. 2021;12(2):503‐522

    Not in our library10.1093/advances/nmaa108

  80. 80.

    Mechanick JI, Brett EM, Chausmer AB, Dickey RA, Wallach S. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for the clinical use of dietary supplements and nutraceuticals. Endocr Pract. 2003;9(5):417‐470

    Not in our library10.4158/ep.9.5.417

  81. 81.

    Batsis JA, Apolzan JW, Bagley PJ, et al. A systematic review of dietary supplements and alternative therapies for weight loss. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2021;29(7):1102‐1113

    Not in our library10.1002/oby.23110

  82. 82.

    Heymsfield SB. Dietary supplements for weight loss. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2023;52(2):457‐467

    Not in our library10.1016/j.gtc.2023.03.010

  83. 83.

    Kidambi S, Batsis JA, Donahoo WT, et al. Dietary supplements and alternative therapies for obesity: a perspective from the Obesity Society's Clinical Committee. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2021;29(7):1095‐1098

    Not in our library10.1002/oby.23189

  84. 84.

    de van der Schueren MAE, Laviano A, Blanchard H, Jourdan M, Arends J, Baracos VE. Systematic review and meta‐analysis of the evidence for oral nutritional intervention on nutritional and clinical outcomes during chemo (radio)therapy: current evidence and guidance for design of future trials. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(5):1141‐1153

    Not in our library10.1093/annonc/mdy114

  85. 85.

    Li M, Zhao S, Wu S, Yang X, Feng H. Effectiveness of oral nutritional supplements on older people with anorexia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients. 2021;13(3)

    Not in our library10.3390/nu13030835

  86. 86.

    Xueting H, Meng Y, Yuqing C, Yutong H, Lihong Q, June Z. Home enteral nutrition and oral nutritional supplements in postoperative patients with upper gastrointestinal malignancy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(5):3082‐3093

    Not in our library10.1016/j.clnu.2020.11.023

  87. 87.

    Chew STH, Tan NC, Cheong M, et al. Impact of specialized oral nutritional supplement on clinical, nutritional, and functional outcomes: a randomized, placebo‐controlled trial in community‐dwelling older adults at risk of malnutrition. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(4):1879‐1892

    Not in our library10.1016/j.clnu.2020.10.015

  88. 88.

    Orsso CE, Montes‐Ibarra M, Findlay M, et al. Mapping ongoing nutrition intervention trials in muscle, sarcopenia, and cachexia: a scoping review of future research. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022;13(3):1442‐1459

    Not in our library10.1002/jcsm.12954

  89. 89.

    Alexander L, Christensen SM, Richardson L, et al. Nutrition and physical activity: An Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement 2022. Obesity Pillars. 2022;1:100005

    Not in our library10.1016/j.obpill.2021.100005

  90. 90.

    Weinheimer EM, Sands LP, Campbell WW. A systematic review of the separate and combined effects of energy restriction and exercise on fat‐free mass in middle‐aged and older adults: implications for sarcopenic obesity. Nutr Rev. 2010;68(7):375‐388

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.00298.x

  91. 91.

    Miller CT, Fraser SF, Levinger I, et al. The effects of exercise training in addition to energy restriction on functional capacities and body composition in obese adults during weight loss: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11):e81692

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0081692

  92. 92.

    Sardeli AV, Komatsu TR, Mori MA, Gáspari AF, Chacon‐Mikahil MPT. Resistance training prevents muscle loss induced by caloric restriction in obese elderly individuals: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Nutrients. 2018;10(4):423

    Not in our library10.3390/nu10040423

  93. 93.

    Lopez P, Taaffe DR, Galvão DA, et al. Resistance training effectiveness on body composition and body weight outcomes in individuals with overweight and obesity across the lifespan: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Obes Rev. 2022;23(5):e13428

    Not in our library10.1111/obr.13428

  94. 94.

    Morales‐Marroquin E, Kohl HW 3rd, Knell G, de la Cruz‐Muñoz N, Messiah SE. Resistance training in post‐metabolic and bariatric surgery patients: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2020;30(10):4071‐4080

    Not in our library10.1007/s11695-020-04837-1

  95. 95.

    Villareal DT, Aguirre L, Gurney AB, et al. Aerobic or resistance exercise, or both, in dieting obese older adults. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(20):1943‐1955

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1616338

  96. 96.

    Lundgren JR, Janus C, Jensen SBK, et al. Healthy weight loss maintenance with exercise, liraglutide, or both combined. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(18):1719‐1730

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa2028198

  97. 97.

    Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, et al. The physical activity guidelines for Americans. JAMA. 2018;320(19):2020‐2028

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.2018.14854

  98. 98.

    Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(7):1334‐1359

    Not in our library10.1249/mss.0b013e318213fefb

  99. 99.

    Pownall HJ, Schwartz AV, Bray GA, et al. Changes in regional body composition over 8 years in a randomized lifestyle trial: the look AHEAD study. Obes (Silver Spring). 2016;24(9):1899‐1905

    Not in our library10.1002/oby.21577

  100. 100.

    Finger D, Goltz FR, Umpierre D, Meyer E, Rosa LH, Schneider CD. Effects of protein supplementation in older adults undergoing resistance training: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Sports Med. 2015;45(2):245‐255

    Not in our library10.1007/s40279-014-0269-4

  101. 101.

    Morton RW, Murphy KT, SR MK, et al. A systematic review, meta‐analysis and meta‐regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training‐induced gains in muscle mass and strength in healthy adults. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(6):376‐384

    Not in our library10.1136/bjsports-2017-097608

  102. 102.

    Verreijen AM, Engberink MF, Memelink RG, van der Plas SE, Visser M, Weijs PJ. Effect of a high protein diet and/or resistance exercise on the preservation of fat free mass during weight loss in overweight and obese older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Nutr J. 2017;16(1):10

    Not in our library10.1186/s12937-017-0229-6

  103. 103.
    Effects of elastic resistance exercise on body composition and physical capacity in older women with sarcopenic obesity · 2017
    No notice
  104. 104.

    Drummen M, Tischmann L, Gatta‐Cherifi B, Adam T, Westerterp‐Plantenga M. Dietary protein and energy balance in relation to obesity and co‐morbidities. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:443

    Not in our library10.3389/fendo.2018.00443

  105. 105.

    Villareal DT, Fontana L, Weiss EP, et al. Bone mineral density response to caloric restriction‐induced weight loss or exercise‐induced weight loss: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(22):2502‐2510

    Not in our library10.1001/archinte.166.22.2502

  106. 106.

    Villareal DT, Banks M, Sinacore DR, Siener C, Klein S. Effect of weight loss and exercise on frailty in obese older adults. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(8):860‐866

    Not in our library10.1001/archinte.166.8.860

  107. 107.

    Liu L, Rosen CJ. New insights into calorie restriction induced bone loss. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2023;38(2):203‐213

    Not in our library10.3803/enm.2023.1673

  108. 108.

    Ormsbee MJ, Prado CM, Ilich JZ, et al. Osteosarcopenic obesity: the role of bone, muscle, and fat on health. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2014;5(3):183‐192

    Not in our library10.1007/s13539-014-0146-x

  109. 109.
    Muscle–Organ Crosstalk: The Emerging Roles of Myokines · 2020
    No notice
  110. 110.

    Barazzoni R, Jensen GL, Correia MI, et al. Guidance for assessment of the muscle mass phenotypic criterion for the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) diagnosis of malnutrition. Clin Nutr. 2022;41(6):1425‐1433

    Not in our library10.1016/j.clnu.2022.02.001

  111. 111.

    Compher C, Cederholm T, Correia MI, et al. Guidance for assessment of the muscle mass phenotypic criterion for the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition diagnosis of malnutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2022;46(6):1232‐1242

    Not in our library10.1002/jpen.2366

  112. 112.

    Heymsfield SB, Gonzalez MC, Lu J, Jia G, Zheng J. Skeletal muscle mass and quality: evolution of modern measurement concepts in the context of sarcopenia. Proc Nutr Soc. 2015;74(4):355‐366

    Not in our library10.1017/s0029665115000129

  113. 113.

    Rose Berlin Piodena‐Aportadera M, Lau S, Chew J, et al. Calf circumference measurement protocols for sarcopenia screening: differences in agreement, convergent validity and diagnostic performance. Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2022;26(3):215‐224

    Not in our library10.4235/agmr.22.0057

  114. 114.

    Hu FJ, Liu H, Liu XL, et al. Mid‐upper arm circumference as an alternative screening instrument to appendicular skeletal muscle mass index for diagnosing sarcopenia. Clin Interv Aging. 2021;16:1095‐1104

    Not in our library10.2147/cia.s311081

  115. 115.

    Gonzalez MC, Mehrnezhad A, Razaviarab N, Barbosa‐Silva TG, Heymsfield SB. Calf circumference: cutoff values from the NHANES 1999‐2006. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021;113(6):1679‐1687

    Not in our library10.1093/ajcn/nqab029

  116. 116.

    Delmonico MJ, Harris TB, Visser M, et al. Longitudinal study of muscle strength, quality, and adipose tissue infiltration. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(6):1579‐1585

    Not in our library10.3945/ajcn.2009.28047

  117. 117.
    Combination of exercise and GLP-1 receptor agonist treatment reduces severity of metabolic syndrome, abdominal obesity, and inflammation: a randomized controlled trial · 2023
    No notice
  118. 118.

    Hahamyan HA, Basaria S. Selective androgen receptor modulators‐transformative drugs or heralds of the next drug epidemic? JAMA. 2024;331(16):1359‐1360

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.2024.1769

  119. 119.

    Rodgers BD, Ward CW. Myostatin/activin receptor ligands in muscle and the development status of attenuating drugs. Endocr Rev. 2022;43(2):329‐365

    Not in our library10.1210/endrev/bnab030

  120. 120.

    Heymsfield SB, Coleman LA, Miller R, et al. Effect of bimagrumab vs placebo on body fat mass among adults with type 2 diabetes and obesity: a phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(1):e2033457

    Not in our library10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33457

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.