Special features of RAD Sequencing data: implications for genotyping

Abstract

Restriction site‐associated DNA Sequencing ( RAD ‐Seq) is an economical and efficient method for SNP discovery and genotyping. As with other sequencing‐by‐synthesis methods, RAD ‐Seq produces stochastic count data and requires sensitive analysis to develop or genotype markers accurately. We show that there are several sources of bias specific to RAD ‐Seq that are not explicitly addressed by current genotyping tools, namely restriction fragment bias, restriction site heterozygosity and PCR GC content bias. We explore the performance of existing analysis tools given these biases and discuss approaches to limiting or handling biases in RAD ‐Seq data. While these biases need to be taken seriously, we believe RAD loci affected by them can be excluded or processed with relative ease in most cases and that most RAD loci will be accurately genotyped by existing tools.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 54

1. 1.
   Rapid, low-input, low-bias construction of shotgun fragment libraries by high-density in vitro transposition · 2010

   No notice
2. 2.
   Analyzing and minimizing PCR amplification bias in Illumina sequencing libraries · 2011

   No notice
3. 3.

   Alkan C, Coe BP, Eichler EE. Genome structural variation discovery and genotyping. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2011;12:363-376.

   Not in our library10.1038/nrg2958

4. 4.

   Amish SJ, Hohenlohe PA, Painter S, et al. RAD sequencing yields a high success rate for westslope cutthroat and rainbow trout species-diagnostic SNP assays. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2012;12:653-660.

   Not in our library10.1111/j.1755-0998.2012.03157.x

5. 5.

   Amores A, Catchen J, Ferrara A, Fontenot Q, Postlethwait JH. Genome evolution and meiotic maps by massively parallel DNA sequencing: Spotted gar, an outgroup for the teleost genome duplication. Genetics. 2011;188:799-808.

   Not in our library10.1534/genetics.111.127324

6. 6.

   Andersen EC, Gerke JP, Shapiro JA, et al. Chromosome-scale selective sweeps shape Caenorhabditis elegans genomic diversity. Nature Genetics. 2012;44:285-290.

   Not in our library10.1038/ng.1050

7. 7.

   Andolfatto P, Davison D, Erezyilmaz D, et al. Multiplexed shotgun genotyping for rapid and efficient genetic mapping. Genome Research. 2011;21:610-617.

   Not in our library10.1101/gr.115402.110

8. 8.
   Rapid SNP Discovery and Genetic Mapping Using Sequenced RAD Markers · 2008

   No notice
9. 9.
   Identification of SNP and SSR markers in eggplant using RAD tag sequencing · 2011

   No notice
10. 10.
    Linkage Mapping and Comparative Genomics Using Next-Generation RAD Sequencing of a Non-Model Organism · 2011

    No notice
11. 11.

    Benjamini Y, Speed TP. Summarizing and correcting the GC content bias in high-throughput sequencing. Nucleic Acids Research. 2012;40:e72.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gks001

12. 12.

    Berry CC, Gillet NA, Melamed A, Gormley N, Bangham CRM, Bushman FD. Estimating abundances of retroviral insertion sites from DNA fragment length data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:755-762.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bts004

13. 13.

    Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. American Journal of Human Genetics. 1980;32:314-331.

    Not in our library

14. 14.
    Stacks : Building and Genotyping Loci De Novo From Short-Read Sequences · 2011

    No notice
15. 15.
    Construction and application for QTL analysis of a Restriction Site Associated DNA (RAD) linkage map in barley · 2011

    No notice
16. 16.

    Davey JW, Blaxter ML. RADSeq: next generation population genetics. Briefings in Functional Genomics. 2011;9:416-423.

    Not in our library10.1093/bfgp/elq031

17. 17.

    Davey JW, Hohenlohe PA, Etter PD, Boone JQ, Catchen JM, Blaxter ML. Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2011;12:499-510.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg3012

18. 18.

    DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nature Genetics. 2011;43:491-498.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.806

19. 19.
    A Robust, Simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Approach for High Diversity Species · 2011

    No notice
20. 20.

    Emerson KJ, Merz CR, Catchen JM, et al. Resolving postglacial phylogeography using high-throughput sequencing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010;107:16196-16200.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1006538107

21. 21.

    Etter PD, Bassham S, Hohenlohe PA, Johnson E, Cresko WA, Orgogozo V, Rockman MV, et al. SNP Discovery and Genotyping for Evolutionary Genetics using RAD Sequencing. Molecular Methods for Evolutionary Genetics. 2011a;157-178.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-1-61779-228-1_9

22. 22.
    Local De Novo Assembly of RAD Paired-End Contigs Using Short Sequencing Reads · 2011

    No notice
23. 23.

    Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species. Nature. 2012;487:94-98.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11041

24. 24.

    Helyar SJ, Hemmer-Hanson J, Bekkevold D, et al. Applications of SNPs for population genetics of nonmodel organisms: new opportunities and challenges. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2011;11:123-136.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02943.x

25. 25.

    Hohenlohe PA, Amish SK, Catchen JM, Allendorf FW, Luikart G. Next-generation RAD sequencing identifies thousands of SNPs for assessing hybridization between rainbow and westslope cutthroat trout. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2011;11:117-122.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02967.x

26. 26.

    Hohenlohe PA, Bassham S, Currey M, Cresko WA. Extensive linkage disequilibrium and parallel adaptive divergence across threespine stickleback genomes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2012;367:395-408.

    Not in our library10.1098/rstb.2011.0245

27. 27.

    Houston RD, Davey JW, Bishop SC, et al. Characterisation of QTL-linked and genome-wide restriction site-associated DNA (RAD) markers in farmed Atlantic salmon. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:244.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2164-13-244

28. 28.

    Johnstone IL, Hope IA. Molecular biology. C. Elegans. A Practical Approach. 1999;201-226.

    Not in our library

29. 29.

    Klein JD, Ossowski S, Schneeberger K, Weigel D, Huson DH. LOCAS – A Low Coverage Assembly Tool for Resequencing Projects. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e23455.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0023455

30. 30.

    Lewis JA, Fleming JT. Basic culture methods. Methods in Cell Biology. 1995;48:3-29.

    Not in our library

31. 31.

    Li H. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2987-2993.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btr509

32. 32.

    Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;26:589-595.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698

33. 33.

    Li R, Zhu H, Ruan J, et al. De novo assembly of human genomes with massively parallel short read sequencing. Genome Research. 2010;20:265-272.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.097261.109

34. 34.

    Lunter G, Goodson M. Stampy: a statistical algorithm for sensitive and fast mapping of Illumina sequence reads. Genome Research. 2011;21:936-939.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.111120.110

35. 35.
    Identification and correction of systematic error in high-throughput sequence data · 2011

    No notice
36. 36.

    Miller MR, Dunham JP, Amores A, Cresko WA, Johnson EA. Rapid and cost-effective polymorphism identification and genotyping using restriction site associated DNA (RAD) markers. Genome Research. 2007;17:240-248.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.5681207

37. 37.
    A conserved haplotype controls parallel adaptation in geographically distant salmonid populations · 2011

    No notice
38. 38.

    Nadeau NJ, Martin SH, Kozak KM, Salazar C, Dasmahapatra KK, Davey JW, Baxter SW, et al. Genome-wide patterns of divergence and gene flow across a butterfly radiation. Molecular Ecology. 2012.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05730.x

39. 39.

    Nielsen R, Paul JS, Albrechtsen A, Song YS. Genotype and SNP calling from next-generation sequencing data. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2011;12:443-451.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg2986

40. 40.

    Peng Y, Leung HCM, Yiu SM, Chin FYL. IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1420-1428.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bts174

Cited by papers we hold 10

• SNP discovery for genetic diversity and population structure analysis coupled with restriction-associated DNA (RAD) sequencing in walnut cultivars of Sichuan Province, China · 2020
  Not checked
• How to identify sex chromosomes and their turnover · 2019
  No notice
• Genomic Selection in Aquaculture: Application, Limitations and Opportunities With Special Reference to Marine Shrimp and Pearl Oysters · 2019
  No notice
• Structure and phylogeography of two tropical predators, spinner (Stenella longirostris) and pantropical spotted (S. attenuata) dolphins, from SNP data · 2018
  Not checked
• Genotyping‐by‐sequencing approaches to characterize crop genomes: choosing the right tool for the right application · 2017
  No notice
• Guidelines for planning genomic assessment and monitoring of locally adaptive variation to inform species conservation · 2017
  No notice
• Applications of genotyping by sequencing in aquaculture breeding and genetics · 2017
  No notice
• Genomics of Rapid Incipient Speciation in Sympatric Threespine Stickleback · 2016
  No notice
• Global Diversity Lines–A Five-Continent Reference Panel of Sequenced Drosophila melanogaster Strains · 2015
  No notice
• Amplification Biases and Consistent Recovery of Loci in a Double-Digest RAD-seq Protocol · 2014
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.