Genetic comparison of mouse lung telocytes with mesenchymal stem cells and fibroblasts

1Recent electron microscopic studies have identified telocytes (TCs), a distinct type of interstitial cells, in many cavitary and non-cavitary organs –. Telocytes are defined by their very long prolongations – called telopodes (Tps; generally, 2–3/cell; length of up to hundreds of μm) – which emerge from a relatively small cellular body. It has been shown that TCs form a 3D network through the organ interstitium surrounding organ-specific structures, blood capillaries, immune cells and nerve endings. As a specific functional property, TCs are key players in intercellular signalling, at both short and long distance. Thus, the long Tps establish direct contacts (junctions) with neighbouring cells and contribute to the (directional) transport of long-range signals driven by TCs. Local (paracrine) signalling of TCs is achieved by shedding vesicles,,.

2The ultrastructural portrait of TCs was recently complemented with the immunophenotypical and electrophysiological characterization and the specific microRNA expression signature,,. However, the gene expression profile for this type of cells has not been reported yet. Prompted by these studies, we sought to compare murine lung TCs with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and fibroblasts to identify the genes which are specifically regulated in TCs. We choose lung TCs as these are well-characterized ultrastructurally and immunohistochemically in situ and in vitro,,,,.

3Mouse colonies were maintained in Animal Research Center of Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Lung samples were obtained from 20 to 25 g male BABL/c mice, 4–6 weeks of age. The mice were killed with an overdose of anaesthetic and the lung tissues were harvested for the isolation of TCs. The animal study was approved by the Ethic Committee for Animal Care and Use, Fudan University. Mesenchymal stem cells and fibroblast cell lines were obtained from Sciencell Research Laboratories (Cat. no. M7500-57, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and from Chinese Academy of Science (Cat. no. GNM28, Shanghai, China) respectively.

4Lung tissues were cut into small pieces and harvested under sterile conditions and collected into sterile tubes containing Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM, Gibco, NY, USA), supplemented with 100 UI/ml penicillin and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO, USA), and the samples were brought to the cell culture room immediately. Samples were further rinsed with sterile DMEM and minced into fragments about 1 mm3, which were then incubated at 37°C for 4 hrs on an orbital shaker, with 1 mg/ml type II collagenase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in PBS without Ca2+ and Mg2+. Dispersed cells were separated from non-digested tissue by the filtration through a 40-μm-diameter cell strainer (BD Falcon, Franklin, NJ, USA), harvested by centrifugation, and resuspended in DMEM supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum (Gibco, NY, USA), 100 UI/ml penicillin and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin. Cell density was counted in a haemocytometer and viability was assessed using the Trypan blue. Cells were distributed in 25 cm2 culture flasks at a density of 1 × 105 cells/cm2 and maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere (5% CO2) until becoming semiconfluent (usually 4 days after plating). Culture medium was changed every 48 hrs. Cultured cells were examined by phase contrast microscope, under an inverted Olympus phase contrast microscope (1 × 51).

5Mouse lung telocytes were isolated after 5 days of culture. Mouse MSCs and fibroblasts were cultured and collected on days 5 and 10 respectively. RNA preparation was performed using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions, including a DNase digestion treatment. The amount and quality of RNA were measured by NanoDrop-1000 spectrophotometer and with the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

6The Mouse 4 × 44K Gene Expression Array (Agilent, Shanghai, China) with about 39,000+ mouse genes and transcripts represented with public domain annotations was applied for the analysis of gene profiles of mouse lung telocytes, MSCs and fibroblasts. Sample labelling and array hybridization were performed according to the protocol of One-Color Microarray-Based Gene Expression Analysis (Agilent Technology). Briefly, 1 μg of total RNA from each sample was linearly amplified and labelled with Cy3-dCTP. The labelled cRNAs were purified by RNAeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). The concentration and specific activity of the labelled cRNAs (pmol Cy3/μg cRNA) were measured by NanoDrop ND-1000. One microgram of each labelled cRNA was fragmented by adding 11 μl 10 × Blocking Agent and 2.2 μl of 25 × Fragmentation Buffer, and heated at 60°C for 30 min. 55 μl 2 × GE Hybridization buffer was added to dilute the labelled cRNA. Hundred microlitre of hybridization solution was dispensed into the gasket slide and assembled to the gene expression microarray slide. The slides were incubated for 17 hrs at 65°C in an Agilent Hybridization Oven. The hybridized arrays were washed, fixed and scanned with the Agilent DNA Microarray Scanner (part number G2505B).

7The acquired array images were analysed with Agilent Feature Extraction software (version 10.7.3.1). Quality normalization and subsequent data processing were performed with the GeneSpring GX v11.5.1 software package. The genes detected in all samples were chosen for further data analysis. Differentially expressed genes were identified through Fold Change filtering and hierarchically clustered by the Agilent GeneSpring GX software (version 11.5.1). Gene ontology and String Network analyses were performed with the standard enrichment computation method to study the relation among variant proteins expressed by variant genes. Fisher's exact test was used to find more overlaps between the descriptive list and the GO annotation list than would be expected by chance. The P-value denoted the significance of GO terms enrichment in the descriptive genes.

8The quality of gene data after filtering and the distribution of data sets were assessed and visualized by Box-Plot. There was no significant difference in distributions of log2 ratios among TCs, MSCs and fibroblasts (Figure S1).

9Gene expression array data show that more than 500 genes are at least 10 times higher expressed in TCs comparing with either MSCs or fibroblasts (Table 1). Several genes are found 100 times up-regulated in TCs versus fibroblasts (Cdh2, Cyba, Rnf128, Dpysl3, Fstl1, Rbp1, Gm12892, Cdh2, Aldh1a1, Gm5864) or MSCs (Rbp1 and Glipr1; Table 1A). Additional genes are significantly overexpressed in TCs comparing with MSCs or fibroblasts (Table 1B). Table 2 is a summary of genes found to be down-regulated in TCs. Although many genes are less expressed in TCs comparing with MSCs or fibroblasts, very few are found at least 100 times down-regulated in TCs. Table 2A and B show the genes with known functions that are found at least 30 times down-regulated specifically in TCs comparing with MSCs and fibroblasts.

10The hierarchical cluster of the genes with more than twofold changes among telocytes, MSCs and fibroblasts is shown in Figure 1. Remarkably, the MCSs and fibroblast gene expression profiles relate each other to higher extent than to TCs supporting the view that TCs have a distinct gene expression pattern. In fact this is an important additional proof that TCs and fibroblasts are different cells. The GO analysis indicates that the genes differentially expressed in TCs are mainly involved in development, in tissue and organ morphogenesis and in transport and maintenance of a biological compound to a specific location (Fig. 2A). In addition, many of the differentially expressed genes likely function in extracellular compartments (Fig. 2B) and may play roles in cell survival, growth and differentiation through autocrine and paracrine activity (Fig. 2C). The relationships, including direct (physical) and indirect (functional) associations, of those genes were analysed by String Network analysis (http://www.string-db.org). Among the 156 co-expressed genes, 46 genes were found to have certain interactions (Fig. 3).

11A set of genes are specifically up- or down-regulated in TCs comparing with both fibroblasts and MSC (Table 3). As last two cell types are developmentally and functionally quite different, one being progenitors and the other differentiated, specialized cells, this set of genes should connect to the specific biological activities of TCs among the other stromal cells. Thus, we have found that several genes with roles in tissue remodelling and repair are significantly up-regulated in TCs (Tables 1A and 3): connective tissue growth factor (CTGF),, Transgelin (Tagln), Nidogen 1 (Nid1),, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 (TIMP3), collagen type IV, alpha (Col4a4, Col4a6, Col4a5),, Matrix Metallopeptidase 10 (Mmp10) –, Matrix Metallopeptidase 3 (Mmp3) – and Retinol-binding protein 1 (RBP1). RBP1 (also known as CRABP-I, CRBP, CRBP1, CRBPI, RBPC) is required in tissue remodelling. Regarding the molecular mechanisms, RBP1 delivers vitamin A to other cells through the plasma membrane protein STRA6 involved in JAK/STAT signalling and the intracellular metabolism of the vitamin. Remarkably, two main components of basement membrane, Collagen type IV and Nidogen 1 are up-regulated in the cultured TCs comparing with both MSCs and fibroblasts. Moreover, TIMP3 is an extracellular matrix-anchored metalloproteinase inhibitor that acts specifically to increase vascular (endothelial) basement membrane stability,. As TCs express Matrix Metalloproteases Mmp3 and Mmp10 also, it is likely that TCs are involved in both basement membrane assembly (stability) and surrounding extracellular matrix remodelling.

12Overall, the data indicate that TCs are clearly distinct from both MSCs and fibroblasts, and the gene signature of TCs suggests specific biological functions in (a) development and tissue morphogenesis, (b) biological compound transport and (c) extracellular matrix remodelling. It has been proposed that TCs play essential roles in angiogenesis given that TCs are frequently found in close vicinity of small vessels and express angiogenesis-related factors (VEGF, NO) and pro-angiogenic microRNAs. The data presented here bring additional support to this view suggesting that TCs may also regulate vascular basement membrane remodelling as key step in vascular branching and de novo vessel formation.