Advances in multiplex PCR: balancing primer efficiencies and improving detection success

Abstract

Summary 1. Multiplex PCR is a valuable tool in many biological studies but it is a multifaceted procedure that has to be planned and optimised thoroughly to achieve robust and meaningful results. In particular, primer concentrations have to be adjusted to assure an even amplification of all targeted DNA fragments. Until now, total DNA extracts were used for balancing primer efficiencies; however, the applicability for comparisons between taxa or different multiple‐copy genes was limited owing to the unknown number of template molecules present per total DNA. 2. Based on a multiplex system developed to track trophic interactions in high Alpine arthropods, we demonstrate a fast and easy way of generating standardised DNA templates. These were then used to balance the amplification success for the different targets and to subsequently determine the sensitivity of each primer pair in the multiplex PCR. 3. In the current multiplex assay, this approach led to an even amplification success for all seven targeted DNA fragments. Using this balanced multiplex PCR, methodological bias owing to variation in primer efficiency will be avoided when analysing field‐derived samples. 4. The approach outlined here allows comparing multiplex PCR sensitivity, independent of the investigated species, genome size or the targeted genes. The application of standardised DNA templates not only makes it possible to optimise primer efficiency within a given multiplex PCR, but it also offers to adjust and/or to compare the sensitivity between different assays. Along with other factors that influence the success of multiplex reactions, and which we discuss here in relation to the presented detection system, the adoption of this approach will allow for direct comparison of multiplex PCR data between systems and studies, enhancing the utility of this assay type.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 45

1. 1.

   Albuquerque P, Mendes MV, Santos CL, Moradas-Ferreira P, Tavares F. DNA signature-based approaches for bacterial detection and identification. Science of the Total Environment. 2009;407:3641-3651.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.10.054

2. 2.

   Amagliani G, Omiccioli E, Andreoni F, Boiani R, Bianconi I, Zaccone R, Mancuso M, Magnani M. Development of a multiplex PCR assay for Photobacterium damselae subsp piscicida identification in fish samples. Journal of Fish Diseases. 2009;32:645-653.

   Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2761.2009.01027.x

3. 3.

   Apte A, Daniel S, Dieffenbach CW, Dveksler GS. PCR primer design. PCR Primer: A Laboratory Manual. 2003;61-74.

   Not in our library

4. 4.

   Dusfour I, Londeau J, Harbach RE, Vythilingham I, Baimai V, Trung HD, Sochanta T, Bangs MJ, Manguin S. Polymerase chain reaction identification of three members of the Anopheles sundaicus (Diptera: Culicidae) complex, malaria vectors in southeast Asia. Journal of Medical Entomology. 2007;44:723-731.

   Not in our library10.1603/0022-2585(2007)44[723:pcriot]2.0.co;2

5. 5.

   Eitzinger B, Traugott M. Which prey sustains cold-adapted invertebrate generalist predators in arable land? Examining prey choices by molecular gut-content analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2011;48:591-599.

   Not in our library

6. 6.

   Elnifro EM, Ashshi AM, Cooper RJ, Klapper PE. Multiplex PCR: optimization and application in diagnostic virology. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2000;13:559-570.

   Not in our library10.1128/cmr.13.4.559-570.2000

7. 7.

   Filteau M, Lagace L, LaPointe G, Roy D. Correlation of maple sap composition with bacterial and fungal communities determined by multiplex automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (MARISA). Food Microbiology. 2011;28:980-989.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.fm.2011.01.008

8. 8.

   Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology. 1994;3:294-299.

   Not in our library

9. 9.

   Gioia G, Lecova L, Genchi M, Ferri E, Genchi C, Mortarino M. Highly sensitive multiplex PCR for simultaneous detection and discrimination of Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens in canine peripheral blood. Veterinary Parasitology. 2010;172:160-163.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.04.027

10. 10.

    Greenstone MH, Weber DC, Coudron TC, Payton ME. Unnecessary roughness? Testing the hypothesis that predators destined for molecular gut-content analysis must be hand-collected to avoid cross-contamination. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2011;11:286-293.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02922.x

11. 11.

    Guichoux E, Lagache L, Wagner S, Chaumeil P, Leger P, Lepais O, Lepoittevin C, Malausa T, Revardel E, Salin F, Petit RJ. Current trends in microsatellite genotyping. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2011;11:591-611.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03014.x

12. 12.

    Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series. 1999;41:95-98.

    Not in our library

13. 13.

    Hamiduzzaman MM, Guzman-Novoa E, Goodwin PH. A multiplex PCR assay to diagnose and quantify Nosema infections in honey bees (Apis mellifera. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2010;105:151-155.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jip.2010.06.001

14. 14.

    Harper GL, King RA, Dodd CS, Harwood JD, Glen DM, Bruford MW, Symondson WOC. Rapid screening of invertebrate predators for multiple prey DNA targets. Molecular Ecology. 2005;14:819-827.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02442.x

15. 15.

    Henegariu O, Heerema NA, Dlouhy SR, Vance GH, Vogt PH. Multiplex PCR: critical parameters and step-by-step protocol. BioTechniques. 1997;23:504-511.

    Not in our library10.2144/97233rr01

16. 16.

    Herrera ML, Vallor AC, Gelfond JA, Patterson TF, Wickes BL. Strain-dependent variation in 18S ribosomal DNA copy numbers in Aspergillus fumigatus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2009;47:1325-1332.

    Not in our library10.1128/jcm.02073-08

17. 17.

    Hill CR, Butler JM, Vallone PM. A 26plex autosomal STR assay to aid human identity testing. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2009;54:1008-1015.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01110.x

18. 18.

    Hodkinson ID, Webb NR, Coulson SJ. Primary community assembly on land – the missing stages: why are the heterotrophic organisms always the first? Journal of Ecology. 2002;90:569-577.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Hosseini R, Keller MA, Schmidt O, Framenau VW. Molecular identification of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) by multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Biological Control. 2007;40:128-135.

    Not in our library

20. 20.

    Kanuch P, Hajkova P, Rehak Z, Bryja J. A rapid PCR-based test for species identification of two cryptic bats Pipistrellus pipistrellus and P. pygmaeus and its application on museum and dropping samples. Acta Chiropterologica. 2007;9:277-282.

    Not in our library

21. 21.

    Kaufmann R. Invertebrate succession on an Alpine glacier foreland. Ecology. 2001;82:2261-2278.

    Not in our library

22. 22.

    King RA, Read DS, Traugott M, Symondson WOC. Molecular analysis of predation: a review of best practice for DNA-based approaches. Molecular Ecology. 2008;17:947-963.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03613.x

23. 23.

    King RA, Vaughan IP, Bell JR, Bohan DA, Symondson WOC. Prey choice by carabid beetles feeding on an earthworm community analysed using species- and lineage-specific PCR primers. Molecular Ecology. 2010;19:1721-1732.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-294x.2010.04602.x

24. 24.

    King AR, Moreno-Ripoll R, Agustí N, Shayler SP, Bell JR, Bohan DA, Symondson WOC. Multiplex reactions for the molecular detection of predation on pest and nonpest invertebrates in agroecosystems. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2011;11:370-373.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02913.x

25. 25.

    Kumar A, Rai KS. Chromosomal localization and copy number of 18S+28S ribosomal-RNA genes in evolutionarily diverse mosquitos (Diptera, Culicidae). Hereditas. 1990;113:277-289.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1601-5223.1990.tb00094.x

26. 26.

    Kuusk AK, Agustí N. Group-specific primers for DNA-based detection of springtails (Hexapoda: Collembola) within predator gut contents. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2008;8:678-681.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.02046.x

27. 27.

    Lee MY, Doh EJ, Kim ES, Kim YW, Ko LS, Oh SE. Application of the multiplex PCR method for discrimination of Artemisia iwayomogi from other Artemisia herbs. Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 2008;31:685-690.

    Not in our library10.1248/bpb.31.685

28. 28.

    Luan Y, Zhang Y, Yue Q, Pang J, Xie R, Yin W. Ribosomal DNA gene and phylogenetic relationships of Diplura and lower Hexapods. Science in China (Series C). 2003;46:67-76.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf03182686

29. 29.

    Macfadyen S, Gibson R, Raso L, Sint D, Traugott M, Memmott J. Parasitoid control of aphids in organic and conventional farming systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2009;133:14-18.

    Not in our library

30. 30.

    Markoulatos P, Siafakas N, Moncany M. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction: a practical approach. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis. 2002;16:47-51.

    Not in our library10.1002/jcla.2058

31. 31.

    Masseret E, Enquebecq M, Laabir M, Genovesi B, Vaquer A, Avarre JC. A simple and innovative method for species identification of phytoplankton cells on minute quantities of DNA. Environmental Microbiology Reports. 2010;2:715-719.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1758-2229.2010.00164.x

32. 32.

    Mendonca FF, Hashimoto DT, Porto-Foresti F, Oliveira C, Gadig OBF, Foresti F. Identification of the shark species Rhizoprionodon lalandii and R. porosus (Elasmobranchii, Carcharhinidae) by multiplex PCR and PCR-RFLP techniques. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2009;9:771-773.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02524.x

33. 33.

    Pitzer JB, Kaufman PE, Tenbroeck SH, Maruniak JE. Host blood meal identification by multiplex polymerase chain reaction for dispersal evidence of stable flies (Diptera: Muscidae) between livestock facilities. Journal of Medical Entomology. 2011;48:53-60.

    Not in our library10.1603/me10123

34. 34.

    Polz MF, Cavanaugh CM. Bias in template-to-product ratios in multitemplate PCR. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1998;64:3724-3730.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.64.10.3724-3730.1998

35. 35.

    Randhawa GJ, Chhabra R, Singh M. Multiplex PCR-based simultaneous amplification of selectable marker and reporter genes for the screening of genetically modified crops. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2009;57:5167-5172.

    Not in our library10.1021/jf900604h

36. 36.

    Robinson MT, Morgan ER, Woods D, Shaw SE. Real-time and multiplex real-time polymerase chain reactions for the detection of Bartonella henselae within cat flea, Ctenocephalides felis, samples. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 2010;24:449-455.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2915.2010.00901.x

37. 37.

    Roques S, Adrados B, Chavez C, Keller C, Magnusson WE, Palomares F, Godoy JA. Identification of neotropical felid faeces using RCP-PCR. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2011;11:171-175.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02878.x

38. 38.

    Roux KH. Optimization and troubleshooting in PCR. PCR Methods and Applications. 1995;4:S185-S194.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.4.5.s185

39. 39.

    Sint D, Raso L, Kaufmann R, Traugott M. Optimizing methods for PCR-based analysis of predation. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2011;11:795-801.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03018.x

40. 40.

    Sipos R, Szekely AJ, Palatinszky M, Revesz S, Marialigeti K, Nikolausz M. Effect of primer mismatch, annealing temperature and PCR cycle number on 16S rRNA gene-targeting bacterial community analysis. Fems Microbiology Ecology. 2007;60:341-350.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00283.x

41. 41.

    Staudacher K, Pitterl P, Furlan L, Cate PC, Traugott M. PCR-based species identification of Agriotes larvae. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 2011a;101:201-210.

    Not in our library10.1017/s0007485310000337

42. 42.

    Staudacher K, Wallinger C, Schallhart N, Traugott M. Detecting ingested plant DNA in soil-living insect larvae. Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 2011b;43:346-350.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.10.022

43. 43.

    Traugott M, Bell JR, Broad GR, Powell W, Van Veen JF, Vollhardt IMG, Symondson WOC. Endoparasitism in cereal aphids: molecular analysis of a whole parasitoid community. Molecular Ecology. 2008;17:3928-3938.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-294x.2008.03878.x

44. 44.

    Traugott M, Bell JR, Raso L, Sint D, Symondson WOC. Generalist predators disrupt parasitoid aphid control by direct and coincidental intraguild predation. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 2012;102:239-247.

    Not in our library10.1017/s0007485311000551

45. 45.

    Webster BL, Rollinson D, Stothard JR, Huyse T. Rapid diagnostic multiplex PCR (RD-PCR) to discriminate Schistosoma haematobium and S. bovis. Journal of Helminthology. 2010;84:107-114.

    Not in our library10.1017/s0022149x09990447

Cited by papers we hold 2

• Species detection from aquatic eDNA: Assessing the importance of capture methods · 2021
  Not checked
• dPCR: A Technology Review · 2018
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.