Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 18, 2026.

Carnobacterium: positive and negative effects in the environment and in foods

Jørgen J. Leisner, Birgit Groth Laursen, Hervé Prévost and 2 more

FEMS Microbiology Reviews · 2007 · Review

doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00080.x

Abstract

The genus Carnobacterium contains nine species, but only C. divergens and C. maltaromaticum are frequently isolated from natural environments and foods. They are tolerant to freezing/thawing and high pressure and able to grow at low temperatures, anaerobically and with increased CO(2) concentrations. They metabolize arginine and various carbohydrates, including chitin, and this may improve their survival in the environment. Carnobacterium divergens and C. maltaromaticum have been extensively studied as protective cultures in order to inhibit growth of Listeria monocytogenes in fish and meat products. Several carnobacterial bacteriocins are known, and parameters that affect their production have been described. Currently, however, no isolates are commercially applied as protective cultures. Carnobacteria can spoil chilled foods, but spoilage activity shows intraspecies and interspecies variation. The responsible spoilage metabolites are not well characterized, but branched alcohols and aldehydes play a partial role. Their production of tyramine in foods is critical for susceptible individuals, but carnobacteria are not otherwise human pathogens. Carnobacterium maltaromaticum can be a fish pathogen, although carnobacteria are also suggested as probiotic cultures for use in aquaculture. Representative genome sequences are not yet available, but would be valuable to answer questions associated with fundamental and applied aspects of this important genus.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 18, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Carnobacteria are ubiquitous lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated from cold and temperate environments. More importantly from a practical viewpoint, they also frequently predominate in a range of foods, including fish, meat, and some dairy products. In this regard, they have been extensively studied in the last two decades as protective cultures, to inhibit pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms, and as potential spoilage bacteria in chilled seafood and meat products. In addition, owing to their presence in the aqueous environment, their importance as fish pathogens or probiotic cultures in the aquaculture industry has been examined.

The genus Carnobacterium currently consists of nine species, but only two of these, Carnobacterium divergens and C. maltaromaticum (formerly C. piscicola) are frequently encountered in the environment and in foods (Table 1). This review concerns the importance of these two species in dairy, meat and fish products and in the aquatic environment. The taxonomy and methods for isolation and identification of carnobacteria are not described. It is, however, important to note that older studies frequently used carbohydrate fermentation patterns to distinguish between C. divergens and C. maltaromaticum. These methods are now considered less reliable than molecular methods, and results relying on phenotypic criteria must be interpreted with caution.

Natural environment

Among the nine reported species of Carnobacterium, only two species, C. divergens and C. maltaromaticum, are frequently isolated from various sources (Table 1). Four species, C. alterfunditum, C. funditum, C. gallinarum and C. mobile, have been isolated a few times from at most three sources (Table 1). Three species, C. inhibens, C. pleistocenium and C. viridans, have only been isolated from one source, but it should be noted that Carnobacterium spp. related to, for example, C. inhibens have been described. Carnobacterium spp. appear to have both the temperate and polar aquatic environments as habitats including live fish (see also ‘Carnobacteria as pathogenic organisms and/or probiotic cultures’), marine sponges, Antarctic lakes, Arctic and Antarctic sea water as well as the deep sea, aquous alkaline tufa columns from Greenland, and freshwater habitats from the temperate clima zone, including a Sphagnum pond (Leisner et al., unpublished results) and rivers in the northwest region of Spain (Table 1). Although C. maltaromaticum and/or C. divergens have been isolated from tropical fish products, including smoked surubim, a Brazilian tropical freshwater fish, and from vacuum-packed tuna caught in the Indian Ocean and processed in Sri Lanka, it cannot, at least in the latter case, be excluded that this is due to contamination associated with repackaging in Denmark.

The presence of carnobacteria has also been demonstrated in the terrestrial environment, including a field treated with whey, Canadian winter soil, permafrost ice, a compost pile, a collapsed horse manure pile, the larval midgut of a moth species, and other sources (Table 1). It appears that the temperate/polar aquatic and terrestrial environments are both natural habitats.

Carnobacterium divergens and C. maltaromaticum possess traits that may play a role in their survival in these surroundings. One study has reported that a Carnobacterium sp. soil isolate related to C. maltaromaticum survived 48 serial freeze–thaw cycles better than Escherichia coli and an Enterococcus sp. soil isolate, but worse than a few other soil isolates, including an Acinetobacter sp.. Indeed, these organisms may survive freezing for considerable periods of time, as witnessed by the isolation of a Carnobacterium sp. preserved in a permafrost ice wedge for 25 000 years. Additional data on the abilities of carnobacteria to grow at low temperatures and to survive frozen storage is available for food products. Also, a cold-active β-galactosidase from C. maltaromaticum and a cold-adapted alanine dehydrogenase from a Carnobacterium sp. related to C. alterfunditum have been reported. Some carnobacterial isolates originate from natural high-pressure habitats, and additional data on resistance to pressure have been reported for high-pressure-processed foods. It has not been described how other physical/chemical parameters such as salt content, atmosphere and pH affect survival and growth of these organisms in the natural environment.

With respect to energy-yielding substrates, one species, C. maltaromaticum, expresses chitinase activity (Leisner & Ingmer, unpublished data). This may facilitate adherence to and survival on zooplankton as suggested for enterococci, and also explain the isolation of this species from the midgut of the larval stage of a species of moth. Interestingly, the arginine deiminase pathway is expressed by the most frequently encountered species, C. divergens, C. gallinarum, C. maltaromaticum and C. mobile (e.g.,;; ) but not by C. inhibens or C. viridans. Arginine is not a substrate that results in growth of C. alterfunditum and C. funditum, and information is not available for C. pleistocenium. This amino acid may represent an additional energy source for growth and survival when carbohydrates are scarce, and it may offer protection against acid stress, as described for Enterococcus faecalis and related species. Finally, carnobacteria are able to catabolize a range of carbohydrates, although there are considerable interspecies and intraspecies heterogeneities. Examples of sources of such carbohydrates include animals (e.g. chitin and, to some extent, lactose, although the targets of the lactose hydrolytic activity shown by carnobacteria may instead be byproducts of plant sugar polymers and saccharides adsorbed to humic acid substances in the soil), plants (e.g. salicin and sucrose), fungi (e.g. chitin and trehalose), prokaryotes (N-acetylglucosamine), and living organisms in general (ribose). The importance of these abilities for growth and survival in the environment deserves further study. The genome sizes of C. alterfunditum, C. divergens and C. pleistocenium strains and a Carnobacterium sp. AT7 deep sea isolate have been estimated to be 2.9, 3.2, 3.2 and 2.4 Mb, respectively, and for the AT7 isolate, the data are reported in a database described by. These sizes are relatively large in comparison to many other LAB, suggesting that carnobacterial genomes may encode a range of genes that makes them well adapted to deal with environmental challenges.

Even if carnobacteria are well adapted to temperate or polar aqueous environments, this does not always provide improved ability to survive as compared to other bacteria. Thus, the actual abilities of strains of C. divergens and C. maltaromaticum isolated from a Sphagnum pond to survive in water from this source were not improved as compared to related gram-positive bacteria originating from other sources (Leisner et al., unpublished data). At present, therefore, the precise mechanisms by which Carnobacterium spp. persist in the natural environment and their underlying genetics are not known. Finally, it should be noted that the environments from which carnobacteria can be isolated are not always as extreme as they appear at first sight. Thus, Carnobacterium spp. isolated from Lake Vanda, Antarctica were found at a depth of 61 m, where the temperature was c. 15–20°C.

Dairy, fish and meat products

High concentrations of bacteria (>106–107 CFU g−1) in food are typically required before their activity is sufficient to influence the sensory properties of a product. For this to happen, occurrence and growth kinetics are the key parameters, and databases, including ComBase, are available to determine the effect of food storage conditions and product characteristics on growth of specific bacteria. However, information on carnobacteria has not yet been included in such databases.

Carnobacterium maltaromaticum and another Carnobacterium sp. have been isolated from milk (; EF204312), and they, in addition to C. divergens, have been detected in soft cheeses, including mold-ripened brie, mozzarella, Camembert and other types. The high concentration of C. divergens in the curd of mozzarella, exposed to 10–37°C during processing, is in agreement with the maximum growth temperature (40°C) of this species.

The occurrence of Carnobacterium in dairy products (and other foods) is most likely underreported. This is due to the common use of acetate containing media, particularly MRS agar (Oxoid CM361) or Rogosa agar (Oxoid CM0627), for enumeration of LAB. Growth of Carnobacterium is inhibited by acetate, and both MRS and Rogosa agar media significantly underestimate concentrations in food.

Carnobacterium divergens and C. maltaromaticum are present in seafood and are able to grow to high concentrations in different fresh and lightly preserved products. Studies of naturally contaminated products suggest which storage conditions and product characteristics select for carnobacteria as compared to the other bacteria present in seafood. For chilled fresh seafood, we have found no reports where C. divergens and C. maltaromaticum dominated the microbial communities in aerobically stored products, but this has been reported for modified atmosphere-packed (MAP) coalfish, cod, pollack, rainbow trout, salmon, shrimp, swordfish and tuna. After frozen storage (−20 to −30°C for 5–8 weeks), C. divergens and C. maltaromaticum seem to be particularly prominent in chilled MAP fish, as has been reported for cod, garfish, salmon, and tuna. In addition to freezing, these carnobacteria are relatively resistant to high-pressure processing and are found in high concentrations in vacuum-packed and chilled squid mantle and cold-smoked salmon previously treated with 200–400 MPa for 15–20 min. In vacuum-packed cold-smoked or sugar-salted (‘gravad’) seafood with 3–7% NaCl in the water phase and a pH of 5.8–6.5, high concentrations of C. divergens and C. maltaromaticum are particularly common, as reported for halibut, rainbow trout, salmon, surubim, and tuna. High concentrations of C. maltaromaticum are also reported in salted lumpfish roe, and it has been isolated from frozen, smoked mussels. Finally, for cooked seafood, high concentrations of C. maltaromaticum have been detected in MAP shrimp after storage at 2–8°C. Both C. divergens and C. mobile were isolated from cooked and brined MAP shrimps (with NaCl, benzoic acid, citric acid and sorbic acid) after storage at 2–8°C. Clearly, carnobacteria are common in chilled fresh and lightly preserved seafood, but at higher storage temperatures (15–25°C), other species, including Enterococcus spp., more frequently dominate the spoilage microbial community of seafood.

Carnobacterium divergens and C. maltaromaticum are able to grow in meat products at temperatures as low as 2 to −1.5°C, and they are frequently predominant members (up to 50%C. divergens and up to 26%C. maltaromaticum of the gram-positive or LAB isolates obtained) of the microbial community of raw meat (beef, pork, lamb, and poultry). The two species are found irrespective of whether products have been stored aerobically, vacuum packaged, or subjected to modified atmospheres, including gas compositions of CO2/N2 (%) ranging from 10: 90 to 80: 20. One study demonstrated the presence of C. divergens in beef stored in air but not in MAP beef with increased concentrations of O2 (20–40%) in addition to CO2 (40%). The growth of C. funditum is impaired by oxygen, and it will be of interest to study further whether addition of O2 to the gas composition of modified atmospheres consistently inhibits growth of carnobacteria, as has been observed for some other bacteria.

Further studies are needed in order to determine whether differences in the presence of carnobacteria in meat are due to variations in storage conditions or variations in contamination levels at the processing plants. The source of carnobacteria in meat products is most probably the processing plant, as these organisms have not been isolated from the gastrointestinal system or skin of chicken, cattle, pigs or sheep, except for one unpublished study (cow rumen, AY244979). Thus, the source of contamination of broiler carcasses by C. divergens and C. maltaromaticum was shown to be the air in the processing plant and not incoming broiler chickens. In fact, two studies confirmed that C. divergens and C. maltaromaticum present in the raw material were eliminated or reduced in number by cooking of a processed meat product, ham.

Carnobacterium divergens and C. maltaromaticum have, however, been detected in a variety of processed meat products, including the cured pork product bacon, ham, a Danish processed pork product (‘rullepølse’) ( and unpublished results), various Spanish processed meat products, cooked poultry meat, pressure-treated (408–888 MPa) chicken, and irradiated pork and chicken. On a few occasions, C. maltaromaticum has even been isolated from fermented sausages; as noted by, this contrasts with the usual nonaciduric habitats of carnobacteria. Other Carnobacterium spp. isolated from processed meat products include C. gallinarium (irradiated chicken), C. mobile (cooked turkey) and C. viridans (vacuum-packed Bologna sausage). Although these organisms are frequently isolated from processed meat products, it has been suggested that they are rarely present in high numbers, and that terminal spoilage of cooked, cured meats is primarily caused by aciduric LAB.

Finally, a Carnobacterium sp. has also been isolated from egg contents, and it was shown that this isolate had a similar ability to penetrate the eggshell and contaminate the whole egg as various other gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.

Transmission routes for carnobacteria from the natural environment into food-manufacturing plants and further on to dairy, fish and meat products are not known to any extent. Knowledge on this topic is essential to evaluate if species and intraspecific clusters that differ in spoilage ability (as discussed later) also have different colonization abilities. Such knowledge would also illuminate the feasibility of using the production of metabolites, especially tyramine, by C. divergens and C. maltaromaticum as an index of microbial spoilage of specific fish and meat products.

Bacteriocins and antimicrobial properties

Carnobacteria with the ability to produce antimicrobial peptides, bacteriocins, are commonly encountered in foods (e.g.; ). The characterized carnobacterial bacteriocins belong to class I and class II [e.g. for bacteriocin nomenclature]. So far, only one class I bacteriocin (lantibiotic), UI149, has been reported to be produced by Carnobacterium. In contrast, ten amino acid-sequenced bacteriocins belong to class II, and most of these more specifically to class IIa, which comprises small pediocin-like peptides (Table 2). The inhibition spectrum of carnobacterial class IIa bacteriocins includes Listeria, and antimicrobial activity is exerted by pore formation, dissipation of membrane potential, and leakage of internal low molecular weight substances.

Class IIa bacteriocins are ribosomally synthesized as inactive prepeptides that are modified by posttranslational cleavage of the N-terminal peptide leader at a double-glycine site in order to release mature and active cationic peptides. Carnobacterial class IIa bacteriocins (Table 2) have similar amino acid sequences, with a YGNGV(X)C(X)4C motif (X denotes any amino acid) near the N-terminus of the mature peptide. Two cysteine residues form a disulfide bond in the N-terminal region, and there is an amphipathic α-helix near the C-terminus. The N-terminal region is relatively hydrophilic and conserved, whereas the C-terminus is hydrophobic and diverse. To establish the structure–activity relationships of carnobacterial bacteriocins, the structures of carnobacteriocin B2 and divercin V41 were modified. Thus, amino acid substitutions closer to the N-terminus in carnobacteriocin B2 drastically reduced or eliminated antimicrobial activity, whereas this was not so for substitutions close to the C-terminal part. Divercin V41 contains a second disulfide bond located in the C-terminal region. When the C-terminal region of divercin V41 was separated from the N-terminus by endoproteinase Asp-N, only the C-terminal fragment was active. After trypsin cleavage next to lysine at position 42 or disulfide reduction, the C-terminus lost its inhibitory activity. These results suggested that both hydrophobicity and folding imposed by this second disulfide bond were essential for antilisterial activity of the C-terminal hydrophobic peptide. Chemical oxidation of tryptophan residues by N-bromosuccinimide showed that these residues were crucial for inhibitory activity, as modification of any one of them rendered divercin V41 inactive. The three-dimensional structure of carnobacteriocin B2, its precursor and the corresponding immunity protein have been solved by nuclear magnetic resonance. These are, at present, the only reported carnobacterial protein structures.

Carnobacterial class II bacteriocins that contain a double-glycine-type leader peptide are transported by a dedicated ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transport system. In contrast, divergicin A does not require a secretion protein, as the transport depend on the general cellular secretion (sec) pathway.

The genes involved in carnobacterial bacteriocin production are generally clustered in operons. In the simplest case, corresponding to the sec-dependent divergicin A, the bacteriocin operon is composed of only the structural gene followed downstream by the gene encoding an immunity protein that protects the cell from is own bacteriocin. Production of class IIa bacteriocins requires four genes as a minimum, including genes encoding bacteriocin, immunity protein, ABC of transport protein and its membrane-bound accessory protein. Genes for bacteriocin production may be encoded on the chromosome or on plasmids (Table 2). Carnobacterium maltaromaticum LV17 produces at least three class II bacteriocins. Carnobacteriocins A and B2 are encoded on different but compatible plasmids, pCP49 (72 kb) and pCP40 (61 kb), respectively. The carnobacteriocin BM1 structural gene and its immunity gene are localized on the chromosome. Activation and export of carnobacteriocin BM1 depend on genes located on plasmid pCP40 encoding carnobacteriocin B2. For carnobacteriocins BM1 and B2, a peptide-pheromone dependent quorum-sensing mode caused by the bacteriocin itself or an autoinducer peptide is involved in the regulation of bacteriocin production by two- and three-component signal transduction systems. The components of this regulatory system consist of an induction factor, a histidine protein kinase, and a response regulator. Four carnobacterial bacteriocin operons including genes for immunity proteins and regulatory proteins involved in bacteriocin expression and secretion have been sequenced (Fig. 1).

External parameters also affect bacteriocin production. Thus, increasing concentrations of NaCl (2–7%) reduced production of A9b/B2 bacteriocin, increasing the temperature from below 19 to 25°C inhibited production of piscicolin 126, and reducing the pH from 6.5 to 5.5 inhibited production of carnobacteriocins BM1 and B2. Acetate (A9b bacteriocin) or the presence of a bacteriocin-sensitive strain belonging to the same genus induced bacteriocin production. It is clear that, in order to apply carnobacterial bacteriocins for the biopreservation of foods, detailed knowledge of the factors that influence production of the bacteriocin is necessary. Finally, it should be noted that the bacteriocinogenic activity may be lost, as shown for a C. divergens divercin V41-producing strain that retained only partial activity after being subjected to spray-drying.

Interest in applying carnobacterial bacteriocins in foods and feeds has been directed towards inhibiting Listeria monocytogenes (Table 3) and spoilage microorganisms, to extend the shelf-life of lightly preserved seafood. These attempts have generally, but not always [e.g. regarding prevention of spoilage, and ], met with success, although diversity in sensitivity of the target organism has been observed. However, the occurrence of resistant L. monocytogenes target organisms has led to the suggestion that bacteriocin-negative LAB may be more suitable for practical use as bioprotective agents against L. monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods. Indeed, L. monocytogenes is inhibited by carnobacterial cultures that do not produce bacteriocins, and this is partly due to glucose depletion. One study also reported a successful application of cultures with no demonstrated bacteriocinogenic activity for extension of the shelf-life of vacuum-packed cold-smoked salmon. This effect was not, however, observed for a C. divergens strain that was unable to produce the class IIa divercin V41.

Resistance of L. monocytogenes to the class IIa divergicin M35 was probably due to modification of the cell wall fatty acid composition. Listeria monocytogenes strains resistant to the class IIa divercin V41 also showed substantial differences in protein expressions as compared with the wild type strain. A σ54-dependent PTS permease of the mannose family (EIItMan), which belongs to the phosphotransferase system (PTS), is responsible for sensitivity of L. monocytogenes to class IIa bacteriocins. These results suggested that EIItMan encoded by the mptACD operon might be a target molecule for class IIa bacteriocins. Recently, two genes coding for a glycerophosphoryl diester phosphodiesterase (GlpQ) and a protein with a putative phosphoesterase function (Pde) were identified as also being involved in the class IIa sensitivity of En. faecalis. Finally, it is important to note that the susceptibility of the target strain is affected by various environmental conditions such as NaCl and pH.

Another cause of concern when using carnobacteria for biopreservation is that C. divergens and C. maltaromaticum both produce tyramine, as discussed further below. Therefore, it has been suggested that a C. divergens strain in which the tyrosine decarboxylase gene is inactivated by mutagenesis could be used as a protective culture to prevent growth of L. monocytogenes in cold-smoked salmon. Currently, no carnobacterial culture, bacteriocin producing or not, is commercially applied for protection against the growth of L. monocytogenes or other bacterial pathogens or spoilage organisms in food.

Effect of catabolic activities on sensory characteristics and safety of foods

As shown in Table 4, the catabolic activities of carnobacteria may result in sensory spoilage of inoculated fish and meat products. Whether this is so for cheese products is not clear. In naturally contaminated products, it seems other members of the bacterial community are typically more important with regard to sensory effects, including spoilage. It is of interest that spoilage was enhanced if moderate-spoilage strains of C. maltaromaticum were inoculated with nonspoilage Vibrio sp. strains or the moderate-spoilage organism Brochothrix thermosphacta into cold-smoked salmon that was subsequently vacuum-packaged. However, this was not so for combinations of C. maltaromaticum and Photobacterium phosphoreum in this product. In addition, a spoilage synergy effect was observed for combinations of B. thermosphacta and C. divergens, C. maltaromaticum or C. mobile in MAP shrimp.

We will first focus on catabolic reactions with carbohydrates and/or organic acids as substrates and with pyruvic acid as an intermediate metabolite. Respiration might occur in the presence of hematin, as shown for C. maltaromaticum, and, indeed, this species consumes substantial proportions of oxygen during exponential growth under aerobic conditions. Carnobacterium spp. are, however, considered to be homofermentative organisms that produce lactic acid from glucose. The presence of the glycolytic pathway in C. divergens has been demonstrated. It can be debated whether carnobacteria should instead be considered facultative or atypical heterofermentative organisms, as C. divergens and C. maltaromaticum are able to utilize ribose and gluconic acid as substrates for growth, and may produce acetic acid, formic acid, and CO2 (e.g.;;; ) as end-products of some secondary decarboxylation/dissimilation reactions of pyruvic acid. Indeed, carnobacteria were initially described as heterofermenters. Acetic acid production by C. divergens and C. maltaromaticum can be substantial during growth in laboratory media under aerobic conditions or in MAP shrimp, and quantitatively it can exceed lactic acid production. Production of acetic acid by C. maltaromaticum is also increased relative to lactic acid if glucose is substituted by ribose. Furthermore, C. maltaromaticum can produce large amounts of ethanol from glucose and ribose during growth in a shrimp extract under anaerobic conditions.

Acetoin can be generated by C. maltaromaticum from pyruvic acid, and this reaction is also found for C. divergens and C. gallinarum but not for C. alterfunditum, C. funditum, C. inhibens and C. viridance, according to reactions in the Voges–Proskauer test. Carnobacterium mobile gives variable reactions, and information is not available for C. pleistocenium. The factors affecting acetoin production are not well known, but production is increased by resting cells of C. maltaromaticum in the presence of hematin. In addition, two out of four strains of C. divergens and C. maltaromaticum isolated from mozzarella cheese were reported to be able to metabolize citric acid, but the potential sensory role of this reaction, e.g. by production of acetoin and diacetyl, was not examined. Production of diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione by C. maltaromaticum during growth in cold-smoked salmon resulted in a butter-like odor but not in spoilage (Table 4). In conclusion, even, if carbohydrate catabolism by carnobacteria appears to result in a diverse number of metabolites, these have generally a limited effect on the sensory attributes of foods. H2O2 may be produced by C. divergens, and formation of this compound by C. viridans has been associated with spoilage in the form of green discoloration of cured Bologna ham (Table 4).

Whether carnobacteria possess proteolytic activities of potential importance for taste in products such as cheese is not known, and this deserves further investigation. In contrast, metabolites resulting from the degradation of amino acids certainly cause sensory effects in foods (Table 4). Generation of branched alcohols and aldehydes (2-methyl-1-butanal, 2-methyl-1-butanol, 3-methyl-1-butanal, 3-methyl-1-butanol, 2-methylpropanal, and 2-methylpropanol) by transamination, decarboxylation and reduction of the amino acids valine, leucine and isoleucine appears to be particularly important. Production of some of these compounds, such as 3-methyl-1-butanal, is strain or species dependent. Production by a C. maltaromaticum strain of 3-methylbutanal, 3-methylbutanol and 3-methylbutanoic acid from leucine was, in general, increased at pH values of 6.5 or higher and in the presence of increased concentrations of α-ketoisocaproic acid and glucose. This strain affected the odor and reduced the leucine content of a sausage mince, but a clear causal relationship was not demonstrated. Production by C. maltaromaticum of alcohols and aldehydes from valine, leucine and/or isoleucine resulted in a malty, green aroma in skimmed milk and shrimp, and has also caused spoilage of cured ham (Table 4). The association between the presence of these compounds and spoilage is, however, not always straightforward, as production of 3-methyl-1-butanal and/or 3-methyl-1-butanol in shrimp by certain C. maltaromaticum strains did not result in malty off-flavors.

Production of NH4+ from arginine as a result of its catabolism catalyzed by the arginine deaminase pathway may, in theory, cause spoilage of shrimp or squid that contain high levels of free arginine. Carnobacterium maltaromaticum and C. divergens but not C. mobile were able to produce NH4+ in MAP shrimp, but this was not the cause of spoilage of this product.

Production of indole from the amino acid tryptophan is also a potential cause of spoilage, although C. divergens, C. maltaromaticum and C. mobile are all unable to carry out this reaction in standard laboratory media. It has, however, been observed that C. divergens and strains belonging to a major phenotypic cluster of C. maltaromaticum were able to use tryptophan as a substrate during growth in MAP shrimp. Whether this resulted in generation of indole was not examined.

Production of tyramine from tyrosine is the only known metabolic reaction by Carnobacterium spp. that constitutes a cause of concern regarding food safety. Not all carnobacterial species possess this ability, as C. mobile does not produce tyramine during growth in shrimp, and variation exists among different strains and phenotypic clusters of C. divergens and C. maltaromaticum for amounts of tyramine produced. Tyramine production by one C. divergens strain was at its maximum during the stationary growth phase and at a low initial pH in the presence of 0.6% glucose, whereas NaCl (10%) was inhibitory. Regardless of strain variation and the effects of environmental parameters, tyramine production by C. divergens and/or C. maltaromaticum has been reported in a range of foods, including meat (up to 28 mg kg−1), a meat–fat mixture (up to 121 mg kg−1), cold-smoked salmon (up to c. 370 mg kg−1), frozen and thawed salmon (up to 40–60 mg kg−1), and shrimp (up to 20–60 mg kg−1). These levels have no adverse effects on most consumers, but for sensitive individuals, e.g. with reduced monoamine oxidase activity due to medication or hereditary deficiency, very little tyramine can cause migraine headaches, and an intake of no more than 5 mg of tyramine per meal has been recommended. Typical consumption of fish and meat products is 50–150 g per meal. As described above, C. divergens and/or C. maltaromaticum are able to form c. 20–370 mg tyramine kg−1 in these products, corresponding to c. 1–55 mg of tyramine per meal. Consequently, tyramine formation by carnobacteria in specific foods can represent a hazard for sensitive individuals who might suffer migraine headaches. This risk for sensitive individuals can be minimized by restricting their consumption of fish and meat to products that are newly processed, i.e. that are not close to the declared shelf-life expiry day.

Growth of Carnobacterium spp. in food products may result in accumulation of a range of volatile alcohols, ketones, hydrocarbons, and other compounds. The metabolic reactions leading to these products have not been studied in detail for Carnobacterium, in contrast to the situation for other LAB, but may be a result of NAD+-generating reactions or nonenzymatic reactions. Several ketones have characteristic odors, but whether they contribute to spoilage off-flavors as a result of carnobacterial metabolic activity is not well understood. With regard to lipids, C. maltaromaticum has been reported to hydrolyze tributyrin, a triglyceride with butyrate as fatty acid, but it is not known whether this lipase activity contributes to flavor changes of dairy, fish and meat products. Carnobacterium divergens and C. maltaromaticum were not able to limit oxidation of linoleic acid during growth. This indicates that these species may not prevent quality deterioration of meat products by lipid oxidation. Finally, C. maltaromaticum has been shown to cause a softer texture of salmon fillets when inoculated in high numbers.

It is worth noting that interspecies and intraspecies differences exist regarding carnobacterial spoilage capacity. showed that C. mobile and a minor phenotypic cluster of C. maltaromaticum did not spoil MAP shrimp, in contrast to what was seen with C. divergens and the major phenotypic cluster of C. maltaromaticum. It would be of interest to examine whether similar heterogeneities exist for Carnobacterium spp. growing in other dairy, fish and meat products. As environmental parameters readily affect the metabolism of carbohydrates and amino acids, it is not surprising that product-specific and storage-specific conditions also play important roles. The ability of two C. maltaromaticum strains to relatively rapidly spoil meat during growth under aerobic conditions at 7°C but not or only after a long storage period in vacuum packs at 2°C serves as an example (Table 4).

Carnobacteria as pathogenic organisms and/or probiotic cultures

Two human clinical cases caused by opportunistic infection with C. maltaromaticum and a Carnobacterium sp. have been described. Two clinical isolates of C. divergens have also been obtained (accession number AY650920). Carnobacteria are not known members of the human gastrointestinal microbial community, unlike several other LAB. The exceptions are an unpublished study reporting an uncultured Carnobacterium sp. clone from cow rumen (AY244976) and two studies demonstrating the presence of carnobacteria in pig and horse effluent-impacted environments (DQ337521; DQ337531). Nevertheless, it is safe to conclude that the presence of Carnobacterium spp. in food does not present a risk factor for human illness, except for the production of the biogenic amine, tyramine, as discussed previously. Neither do Carnobacterium spp. appear to present a risk for nocosomial infections in hospitals and similar institutions, although they have, in one instance, been isolated from contaminated blood plasma.

The presence of virulence factors in carnobacteria is not well documented. Thus C. maltaromaticum strains isolated from diseased fish lacked hemolytic and phospholipolytic activities. Carnobacterium viridans shows, however, β-hemolytic activity on sheep blood agar. Although several isolates of carnobacteria produce bacteriocins, none of these compounds has been reported to exert a cytolytic activity as shown for the En. faecalis class I-related bacteriocin cytolysin. Regarding chemotherapeutic agents, fish pathogenic strains of C. maltaromaticum were resistant to several of the agents widely used in aquaculture, such as oxytetracycline, quinolones, nitrofurans and potentiated sulfonamides, but sensitive to erythromycin. This species is not resistant to lysozyme from salmonid eggs, which supports the idea that it is not vertically transmitted, at least in this fish species. Finally, it should be noted that two clinical isolates of C. divergens have been reported to possess a gene encoding a new class of penicillinase (AY650920). It will be of interest to further explore the distribution of this enzyme among carnobacterial species as well as its functionality.

It has been documented that some strains of C. maltaromaticum are pathogenic for several fish species, including Australian salmonids, carp, rainbow trout, striped bass and channel catfish, and salmon. Pathologic effects vary, and include, for example, septicemia, peritonitis, exophthalmia, accumulation of ascitic fluid, and hemorrhages. In most (but not all) instances, the virulence appears, however, to be low and only causes problems in fish undergoing severe stress, e.g. due to spawning. It is, therefore, not surprising that C. maltaromaticum and C. maltaromaticum-like strains are also found in the intestine or gills of healthy fish, including Arctic charr, Atlantic cod, Atlantic salmon, brown bullhead, trout, and various freshwater fish. also summarize some of these findings.

The presence of other carnobacterial species in healthy fish has also been reported, including C. divergens [Arctic charr, Atlantic salmon, Atlantic cod and wolffish, trout, and freshwater fish], C. alterfunditum-like [rainbow trout], C. funditum-like [Arctic charr and Atlantic cod], C. gallinarum [Atlantic cod], C. inhibens [Atlantic salmon], C. mobile-like [Arctic charr and Atlantic cod], and Carnobacterium spp. [Arctic charr and carp]. Clearly, further research is necessary to clarify under what circumstances Carnobacterium spp. may be pathogenic for fish and whether the infective capability is species and clone specific.

The reported pathogenicity of C. maltaromaticum has not hindered research into the possibility of using other carnobacteria as probiotic cultures in aquaculture, including Carnobacterium sp., C. alterfunditum, C. divergens, and C. inhibens. Isolates of these species, in addition to C. maltaromaticum, exhibit inhibitory activity towards bacterial fish pathogens. Carnobacterium divergens and C. maltaromaticum enhance the cellular and humoral immune responses and cytokine expression ratios of rainbow trout. Use of carnobacteria as probiotics leads to increased survival of the fish in some instances [larvae of cod fry and Atlantic salmon fry, rainbow trout, and salmon], but not in others [larvae of cod fry, and rainbow trout]. One study showed that in vitro exposure to C. divergens did not reverse the effects of bacterial pathogens, although these were alleviated. Additional research is necessary to validate the usefulness of carnobacteria as probiotic cultures.

Carnobacterium maltaromaticum has also been reported to be pathogenic for the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, upon injection into the thorax. This specific case of pathogenesis is probably best understood as a result of opportunistic infection, although C. maltaromaticum (but not C. divergens, C. gallinarum, C. inhibens, C. mobile or C. viridans) exerts chitinolytic acitivity (Leisner & Ingmer, unpublished data), a feature that can be perceived as targeting the chitin-containing exoskeleton of insects. Indeed, insects may serve as a host for this species.

Genomics

The complete chromosomes of many LAB species have now been sequenced. Currently, 19 complete genome sequences of streptococci and 18 complete genome sequences of the nonpathogenic LAB representing 14 species from the order Lactobacillales are available. However, no genome sequence or physical genetic map is available for Carnobacterium. The LAB have relatively small genomes for nonobligatory bacterial parasites or symbionts, ranging from c. 1.6 to c. 3 Mb. For C. divergens and C. pleistocenium, the genome size was estimated to 3.2 Mb, and for C. alterfunditum pf4T, it was estimated to be 2.9 Mb. At the time of writing (March 2007), there is only one Carnobacterium genome sequencing project. Carnobacterium sp. AT7, a piezophilic strain isolated from the Aleutian trench at a depth of 2500 m, is being sequenced for the Moore Foundation Marine Microbial Genome Sequencing Project with a grant to the J. Craig Venter Institute. The data already available indicate that the Carnobacterium sp. AT7 genome contains 2.4 Mb and encodes 2388 proteins (http://www.genomesonline.org). Carnobacterium sp. AT7 is closely related to C. alterfunditum and C. pleistocenium.

To date, knowledge on the genes and DNA sequences of Carnobacterium is comparatively sparse, concerning mostly bacteriocin-related genes in the species C. divergens and C. maltaromaticum (Table 2) and 16S rRNA and 16S–23S rRNA gene intergenic spacer sequences. Genes involved in some important carnobacterial metabolic traits have been sequenced (Table 5). The genetic information obtained is, for most sequences, derived from just one strain, and may therefore be strain specific, as shown for a number of L. monocytogenes genes.

Clearly, our knowledge of important phenotypes of strains and species of Carnobacterium would benefit from the availability of a complete genome sequence for a strain representative of C. maltaromaticum, which is the species with most importance for the food and aquaculture industries. The most extensive study on phenotypic variation of C. maltaromaticum revealed that the majority of strains studied belonged to one phenotypic cluster (cluster H). Thus, in our opinion, a suitable candidate for a whole genomic sequence could be either C. maltaromaticum LMG 22901 (isolated from pork meat), LMG 22899 (isolated from cod) or LMG 22898 (isolated from salmon), which all belong to this phenotypic cluster. LMG 22901 does not harbor plasmids (Laursen, unpublished), and therefore appears to be a prime candidate for such an endeavor.

Concluding remarks

We have come some way towards understanding important aspects of the presence of carnobacteria in foods and the environment, particularly concerning the genetics of carnobacterial bacteriocins and their application. However, there are important areas where knowledge on these bacteria is limited. These include the following:

Distribution and quantitative microbial ecology: Carnobacterium spp. have not been reported from a number of habitats, such as plants, fermented vegetable foods and the gastrointestinal system of birds and mammals, including humans, that have otherwise been associated with several genera and species of LAB. This may, in some instances, be due to faulty methodology for detecting carnobacteria. Generally, however, our quantitative understanding is limited regarding factors that influence inactivation, survival or growth of carnobacteria in various natural environments. In foods, more detailed information is available, but mathematical models for quantitative prediction of processing, product and storage effects on growth and metabolic activity, including bacteriocin and tyramine formation, awaits further development together with recording of responses in databases. In addition, further studies are needed to elucidate mechanisms underlying the relationship between environmental parameters and kinetic responses of carnobacteria.

Routes of food contamination: To reduce the negative effects of carnobacteria in foods (spoilage metabolites and tyramine), further information on routes of contamination is desirable. In fact, very little research has been performed so far concerning this aspect of carnobacteria in food.

Metabolic activity: It is known that carnobacteria, or at least C. maltaromaticum and C. divergens, have the capacity to produce a wide range of metabolites in chilled food. Further studies on the importance of these metabolites with respect to positive and negative sensory attributes of various foods are, however, needed.

Diversity: We are beginning to appreciate how interspecies and intraspecies variation determine the positive and negative effects of the presence of carnobacteria in food and the environment, but we still do not understand how such variation affects, for instance, their survival in food-processing plants and contamination of foods. The significance of such variation for their potential as fish pathogens also needs to be substantiated. This is also the case for their role as spoilage organisms in meat and fish products, with the exception of a few products such as vacuum-packed smoked salmon and cooked MAP shrimps.

Genomics: Representative genome sequences would offer a very valuable road map in order to answer many of the outstanding questions associated with this important genus.

Statement

Reuse of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.

References 222

  1. 1.

    Ahn C, Stiles ME. Plasmid-associated bacteriocin production by a strain of Carnobacterium piscicola from meat. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990;56:2503-2510.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.56.8.2503-2510.1990

  2. 2.

    Alves VF, de Martinis ECP, Destro MT, Vogel BF, Gram L. Antilisterial activity of a Carnobacterium piscicola isolated from Brazilian smoked fish (Surubim [Pseudoplatystoma sp.]) and its activity against a persistant strain of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from Surubim. J Food Prot. 2005;68:2068-2077.

    Not in our library10.4315/0362-028x-68.10.2068

  3. 3.

    Asakawa A, Yamaguchi K, Konosu S. Taste-active components of the shrimp Pandalus borealis. Nippon Shokuhin Kogyo Gakkaishi. 1981;28:594-599.

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    Azuma T, Bagenda DK, Yamamoto T, Kawai Y, Yamazaki K. Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes by freeze-dried piscicocin CS526 fermentate in food. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2007;44:138-144.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1472-765x.2006.02054.x

  5. 5.

    Barakat RK, Griffiths MW, Harris LJ. Isolation and characterization of Carnobacterium, Lactococcus, and Enterococcus spp. from cooked, modified atmosphere packaged, refrigerated, poultry meat. Int J Food Microbiol. 2000;62:83-94.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0168-1605(00)00381-0

  6. 6.

    Basby M, Jeppesen VF, Huss HH. Characterization of the microflora of lightly salted lumpfish (Cyclopterus lumpus) roe stored at 5°C. J Aquat Food Product Technol. 1998;7:35-51.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    Baya AM, Toranzo AE, Lupiani B, Li T, Roberson BS, Hetrick FM. Biochemical and serological characterization of Carnobacterium spp. isolated from farmed and natural populations of striped bass and catfish. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991;57:3114-3120.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.57.11.3114-3120.1991

  8. 8.

    Bhugaloo-Vial P, Dousset X, Metivier A, Sorokine O, Anglade P, Boyaval P, Marion D. Purification and amino acid sequences of piscicocins V1a and V1b, two class IIa bacteriocins secreted by Carnobacterium piscicola V1 that display significantly different levels of specific inhibitory activity. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62:4410-4416.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.62.12.4410-4416.1996

  9. 9.

    Bhugaloo-Vial P, Douliez J-P, Mollé D, Dousset X, Boyaval P, Marion D. Delineation of key amino acid side chains and peptide domains for antimicrobial properties of divercin V41, a pediocin-like bacteriocin secreted by Carnobacterium divergens V41. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:2895-2900.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.65.7.2895-2900.1999

  10. 10.

    Björkroth J, Ristiniemi M, Vandamme P, Korkeala H. Enterococcus species dominating in fresh modified-atmosphere-packaged, marinated broiler legs are overgrown by Carnobacterium and Lactobacillus species during storage at 6°C. Int J Food Microbiol. 2005;97:267-276.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.04.011

  11. 11.

    Blom H, Katla T, Nissen H, Holo H. Characterization, production and purification of carnocin H, a bacteriocin produced by Carnobacterium 377. Curr Microbiol. 2001;43:227-231.

    Not in our library10.1007/s002840010292

  12. 12.

    Borch E, Molin G. Numerical taxonomy of psychrotrophic lactic acid bacteria from prepacked meat and meat products. Anton Leeuw. 1988;54:301-323.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf00393522

  13. 13.

    Borch E, Molin G. The aerobic growth and product formation of Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc, Brochothrix, and Carnobacterium in batch cultures. Appl Microbiol Biotech. 1989;30:81-88.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    Borch E, Kant-Muermans M-L, Blixt Y. Bacterial spoilage of meat and cured meat products. Int J Food Microbiol. 1996;33:103-120.

    Not in our library10.1016/0168-1605(96)01135-x

  15. 15.

    Bover-Cid S, Holzapfel WH. Improved screening procedure for biogenic amine production by lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol. 1999;53:33-41.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0168-1605(99)00152-x

  16. 16.

    Bratina BJ, Stevenson BS, Green WJ, Schmidt TM. Manganese reduction by microbes from oxic regions of the Lake Vanda (Antarctica) water column. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:3791-3797.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.64.10.3791-3797.1998

  17. 17.

    Brillet A, Pilet M-F, Prevost H, Bouttefroy A, Leroi F. Biodiversity of Listeria monocytogenes sensitivity to bacteriocin-producing Carnobacterium strains and application in sterile cold-smoked salmon. J Appl Microbiol. 2004;97:1029-1037.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02383.x

  18. 18.

    Brillet A, Pilet M-F, Prevost H, Cardinal M, Leroi F. Effect of inoculation of Carnobacterium divergens V41, a biopreservative strain against Listeria monocytogenes risk, on the microbiological, chemical and sensory quality of cold-smoked salmon. Int J Food Microbiol. 2005;104:309-324.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.03.012

  19. 19.

    Brillet A, Matamoros S, Blanchet-Chevrollier C, Leroi F, Prevost H, Pilet M-F, Luten J, Jacobsen C, Bekaert K, Sæbø A, Oehlenschlager J. Selection of non-tyramine producing Carnobacterium strains for the biopreservation of cold-smoked salmon. Seafood Research from Fish to Dish. 2006;403-410.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    Buchanan RL, Klawitter LA. Effectiveness of Carnobacterium piscicola LK5 for controlling the growth of Listeria monocytogenes Scott A in refrigerated foods. J Food Safety. 1992;12:219-236.

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    Buchanan RL, Bagi LK. Microbial competition: effect of culture conditions on the suppression of Listeria monocytogenes Scott A by Carnobacterium piscicola. J Food Prot. 1997;60:254-261.

    Not in our library10.4315/0362-028x-60.3.254

  22. 22.

    Budde BB, Hornbæk T, Jacobsen T, Barkholt V, Koch AG. Leuconostoc carnosum 4010 has the potential for use as a protective culture for vacuum-packed meats: culture isolation, bacteriocin identification, and meat application experiments. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003;83:171-184.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0168-1605(02)00364-1

  23. 23.

    Cailliez-Grimal C, Miguindou-Mabiala R, Leseine M, Revol-Junelles A-M, Millière J-B. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction used for the rapid detection of Carnobacterium species from French soft cheeses. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005;250:163-169.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.femsle.2005.05.037

  24. 24.

    Cailliez-Grimal C, Edima HC, Revol-Junelles A-M, Millière J-B. Carnobacterium maltaromaticum: the only Carnobacterium species in French ripened soft cheeses as revealed by polymerase chain reaction detection. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90:1133-1138.

    Not in our library10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(07)71599-0

  25. 25.

    Calvez AR, Auffray Y, Prévost H, Drider D. Identification of new genes associated with intermediate resistance of Enterococcus faecalis to divercin V41, a pediocin-like bacteriocin. Microbiol. 2007;153:1609-1618.

    Not in our library10.1099/mic.0.2006/004812-0

  26. 26.

    Campos CA, Mazzotta AS, Montville TJ. Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes by Carnobacterium piscicola in vacuum-packaged cooked chicken at refrigeration temperatures. J Food Safety. 1997;17:151-160.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    Chenoll E, Macián MC, Elizaquível P, Aznar R. Lactic acid bacteria associated with vacuum-packed cooked meat product spoilage: population analysis by rDNA-based methods. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;102:498-508.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03081.x

  28. 28.

    Chmelař D, Matušek A, Korger J, Durnová E, Steffen M, Chmelařová E. Isolation of Carnobacterium piscicola from human pus – Case report. Folia Microbiol. 2002;47:455-457.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf02818708

  29. 29.

    Collins MD, Farrow JAE, Phillips BA, Ferusu S, Jones D. Classification of Lactobacillus divergens, Lactobacillus piscicola, and some catalase-negative, asporogenous, rod-shaped bacteria from poultry in a new genus, Carnobacterium. Int J System Bacteriol. 1987;37:310-316.

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    Collins MD, Hutson RA, Foster G, Falsen E, Weiss N. Isobaculum melis gen. nov., sp. nov., a Carnobacterium-like organism isolated from the intestine of a badger. Int J System Evol Microbiol. 2002;52:207-210.

    Not in our library10.1099/00207713-52-1-207

  31. 31.

    Connil N, Prévost H, Dousset X. Production of biogenic amines and divercin V41 in cold smoked salmon inoculated with Carnobacterium divergens V41, and specific detection of this strain by multiplex-PCR. J Appl Microbiol. 2002;92:611-617.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01561.x

  32. 32.

    Coombs J, Brenchley JE. Characterization of two new glycosyl hydrolases from the lactic acid bacterium Carnobacterium piscicola strain BA. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:5094-5099.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.67.11.5094-5099.2001

  33. 33.

    Coombs JM, Brenchley JE. Biochemical and phylogenetic analyses of a cold-active β-galactosidase from the lactic acid bacterium Carnobacterium piscicola BA. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:5443-5450.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.65.12.5443-5450.1999

  34. 34.

    Coton M, Coton E, Lucas P, Lonvaud A. Identification of the gene encoding a putative tyrosine decarboxylase of Carnobacterium divergens 508. Development of molecular tools for the detection of tyramine-producing bacteria. Food Microbiol. 2004;21:125-130.

    Not in our library

  35. 35.

    Coventry MJ, Gordon JB, Wilcock A, Harmark K, Davidson BE, Hickey MW, Hillier AJ, Wan J. Detection of bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria isolated from foods and comparison with pediocin and nisin. J Appl Microbiol. 1997;83:248-258.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-2672.1997.00216.x

  36. 36.

    Dainty RH. Chemical/biochemical detection of spoilage. Int J Food Microbiol. 1996;33:19-33.

    Not in our library10.1016/0168-1605(96)01137-3

  37. 37.

    Dainty RH, Mackey BM. The relationship between the phenotypic properties of bacteria from chill-stored meat and spoilage processes. J Appl Bacteriol Symp Suppl. 1992;73:103S-114S.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2672.1992.tb03630.x

  38. 38.

    Dalet K, Cenatiempo Y, Cossart P, Héchard Y. A σ54-dependent PTS permease of the mannose family is responsible for sensitivity of Listeria monocytogenes to mesentericin Y105. Microbiol. 2001;147:3263-3269.

    Not in our library10.1099/00221287-147-12-3263

  39. 39.

    Dalgaard P, Vancanneyt M, Euras Vilalta N, Swings J, Fruekilde P, Leisner JJ. Identification of lactic acid bacteria from spoilage associations of cooked and brined shrimps stored under modified atmosphere between 0°C and 25°C. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94:80-89.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01806.x

  40. 40.

    Dalgaard P, Madsen HL, Samieian N, Emborg J. Biogenic amine formation and microbial spoilage in chilled garfish (Belone belone belone) – effect of modified atmosphere packaging and previous frozen storage. J Appl Microbiol. 2006;101:80-95.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02905.x

All 222 references

Cited by papers we hold 3

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.