Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 30, 2026.

The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: implications for species distribution modelling

Mary Susanne Wisz, Julien Pottier, W. Daniel Kissling and 21 more

Biological Reviews · 2012 · Review

doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2012.00235.x

Abstract

Predicting which species will occur together in the future, and where, remains one of the greatest challenges in ecology, and requires a sound understanding of how the abiotic and biotic environments interact with dispersal processes and history across scales. Biotic interactions and their dynamics influence species' relationships to climate, and this also has important implications for predicting future distributions of species. It is already well accepted that biotic interactions shape species' spatial distributions at local spatial extents, but the role of these interactions beyond local extents (e.g. 10 km 2 to global extents) are usually dismissed as unimportant. In this review we consolidate evidence for how biotic interactions shape species distributions beyond local extents and review methods for integrating biotic interactions into species distribution modelling tools. Drawing upon evidence from contemporary and palaeoecological studies of individual species ranges, functional groups, and species richness patterns, we show that biotic interactions have clearly left their mark on species distributions and realised assemblages of species across all spatial extents. We demonstrate this with examples from within and across trophic groups. A range of species distribution modelling tools is available to quantify species environmental relationships and predict species occurrence, such as: ( i ) integrating pairwise dependencies, ( ii ) using integrative predictors, and ( iii ) hybridising species distribution models (SDMs) with dynamic models. These methods have typically only been applied to interacting pairs of species at a single time, require a priori ecological knowledge about which species interact, and due to data paucity must assume that biotic interactions are constant in space and time. To better inform the future development of these models across spatial scales, we call for accelerated collection of spatially and temporally explicit species data. Ideally, these data should be sampled to reflect variation in the underlying environment across large spatial extents, and at fine spatial resolution. Simplified ecosystems where there are relatively few interacting species and sometimes a wealth of existing ecosystem monitoring data (e.g. arctic, alpine or island habitats) offer settings where the development of modelling tools that account for biotic interactions may be less difficult than elsewhere.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 158

  1. 1.

    Abrahamczyk S, Kessler M. Hummingbird diversity, food niche characters, and assemblage composition along a latitudinal precipitation gradient in the Bolivian lowlands. Journal of Ornithology. 2010;151:615-625.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    Agustí J, Antón M. Mammoths, Sabertooths, and Hominids: 65 Million Years of Mammalian Evolution in Europe. 2002.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    Algar AC, Kharouba HM, Young ER, Kerr JT. Predicting the future of species diversity: macroecological theory, climate change, and direct tests of alternative forecasting methods. Ecography. 2009;32:22-33.

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    ÁLvarez-Loayza P, White JF, Torres MS, Balslev H, Kristiansen T, Svenning J-C, Gil N. Light converts endosymbiotic fungus to pathogen, influencing seedling survival and niche-space filling of a common tropical tree. Iriartea deltoidea. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e16386.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0016386

  5. 5.

    Araújo MB, Luoto M. The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2007;16:743-753.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    Augustin NH, Mugglestone MA, Buckland ST. An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife. Journal of Applied Ecology. 1996;33:339-347.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    Austin MP. Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecological Modelling. 2002;157:101-118.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    Bartish IV, Kadereit JW, Comes HP. Late Quaternary history of Hippophaë rhamnoides L. (Elaeagnaceae) inferred from chalcone synthase intron (Chsi) sequences and chloroplast DNA variation. Molecular Ecology. 2006;15:4065-4083.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.03079.x

  9. 9.

    Bascompte J. Mutualistic networks. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2009;7:429-436.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    Bauer IE, McMorrow J, Yalden DW. The historic ranges of three equid species in north-east Africa: a quantitative comparison of environmental tolerances. Journal of Biogeography. 1994;21:169-182.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Bellingham PJ, Towns DR, Cameron EK, Davis JJ, Wardle DA, Wilmshurst JM, Mulder CPH. New Zealand island restoration: seabirds, predators, and the importance of history. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 2010;34:115-136.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    Bennett KD, Lamb HF. Holocene pollen sequences as a record of competitve interacitons among tree populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 1988;3:141-144.

    Not in our library10.1016/0169-5347(88)90178-4

  13. 13.

    Berger J, Stacey PB, Bellis L, Johnson MP. A mammalian predator-prey imbalance: grizzly bear and wolf extinction affect avian neotropical migrants. Ecological Applications. 2001;11:947-960.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    Bertolino S. Introduction of the American grey squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) in Europe: a case study in biological invasion. Current Science. 2008;95:903-906.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    Billick I, Case TJ. Higher order interactions in ecological communities: what are they and how can they be detected? Ecology. 1994;75:1529-1543.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Bohn U, Neuhäusl R. Map of the Natural Vegetation of Europe. 2003.

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    Bond WJ, Midgley GF, Woodward FI. The importance of low atmospheric CO2 and fire in promoting the spread of grasslands and savannas. Global Change Biology. 2003;9:973-982.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    Boursot P, Auffray JC, Brittondavidian J, Bonhomme F. The evolution of house mice. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1993;24:119-152.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    Bowers MA, Brown JH. Body size and coexistence in desert rodents: chance or community structure? Ecology. 1982;63:391-400.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    Braschler B, Hill JK. Role of larval host plants in the climate-driven range expansion of the butterfly Polygonia c-album. Journal of Animal Ecology. 2007;76:415-423.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01217.x

  21. 21.

    Briers RA. Range limits and parasite prevalence in a freshwater snail. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B. 2003;270:S178-S180.

    Not in our library10.1098/rsbl.2003.0046

  22. 22.

    Brooker RW. Plant-plant interactions and environmental change. New Phytologist. 2006;171:271-284.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01752.x

  23. 23.

    Brooker RW, Callaghan TV. The balance between positive and negative plant interactions and its relationship to environmental gradients: a model. Oikos. 1998;81:196-207.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Brooker RW, Callaway RM, Cavieres LA, Kikvidze Z, Lortie CJ, Michalet R, Pugnaire FI, Valiente-Banuet A, Whitham TG. Don't diss integration: a comment on Ricklefs' disintegrating communities. The American Naturalist. 2009;174:919-927.

    Not in our library10.1086/648058

  25. 25.

    Bruelheide H, Scheidel U. Slug herbivory as a limiting factor for the geographical range of Arnica montana. Journal of Ecology. 1999;87:839-848.

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    Bullock JM, Edwards RJ, Carey PD, Rose RJ. Geographical separation of two Ulex species at three spatial scales: does competition limit species' ranges? Ecography. 2000;23:257-271.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    Callaghan TV, Johansson M, Heal OW, Saelthun NR, Barkved LJ, Bayfield N, Brandt O, Brooker R, Christiansen HH, Forchhammer M, Høye TT, Humlum O, Järvinen A, Jonasson C, Kohler J, Magnusson B, Meltofte H, Mortensen L, Neuvonen S, Pearce I, Rasch M, Turner L, Hasholt B, Huhta E, Leskinen E, Nielsen N, Siikamäki P. Environmental changes in the North Atlantic Region: SCANNET as a collaborative approach for documenting, understanding and predicting changes. Ambio Special Report Number. 2004;13:39-50.

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    Callaway RM, Brooker RW, Choler P, Kikvidze Z, Lortie CJ, Michalet R, Paolini L, Pugnaire FI, Newingham B, Aschehoug ET, Armas C, Kikodze D, Cook BJ. Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress. Nature. 2002a;417:844-848.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature00812

  29. 29.

    Callaway RM, DeLucia EH, Moore D, Nowak R, Schlesinger WH. Competition and facilitation: contrasting effects of Artemisia tridentata on desert vs. montane pines. Ecology. 1996;77:2130-2141.

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    Callaway RM, Reinhart KO, Moore GW, Moore DJ, Pennings SC. Epiphyte host preferences and host traits: mechanisms for species-specific interactions. Oecologia. 2002b;132:221-230.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00442-002-0943-3

  31. 31.

    Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Rodriguez A, Holben WE. Soil biota and exotic plant invasion. Nature. 2004;427:731-733.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature02322

  32. 32.

    Case TJ, Bender EA. Testing for higher order interactions. The American Naturalist. 1981;118:920-929.

    Not in our library

  33. 33.

    Choler P, Michalet R, Callaway RM. Facilitation and competition on gradients in alpine plant communities. Ecology. 2001;82:3295-3308.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    Dalsgaard B, González AMM, Olesen JM, Ollerton J, Timmermann A, Andersen LH, Tossas AG. Plant-hummingbird interactions in the West Indies: floral specialisation gradients associated with environment and hummingbird size. Oecologia. 2009;159:757-766.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00442-008-1255-z

  35. 35.

    van Dam NM. How plants cope with biotic interactions. Plant Biology. 2009;11:1-5.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00179.x

  36. 36.

    Damgaard C, Fayolle A. Measuring the importance of competition: a new formulation of the problem. Journal of Ecology. 2010;98:1-6.

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    Davis AJ, Jenkinson LS, Lawton JH, Shorrocks B, Wood S. Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature. 1998;391:783-786.

    Not in our library10.1038/35842

  38. 38.

    Dengler JF, Jansen F, Glöckler F, Peet RK, De Cáceres M, Chytrý M, Ewald J, Oldeland J, Lopez-Gonzalez G, Finckh M, Mucina L, Rodwell JS, Schaminée JHJ, Spencer N. The Global Index of Vegetation-Plot Databases (GIVD): a new resource for vegetation science. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2011;22:582-597.

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    Dormann CF, McPherson JM, Araújo MB, Bivand R, Bolliger J, Carl G, Davies RG, Hirzel A, Jetz W, Kissling WD, Kühn I, Ohlemüller R, Peres-Neto PR, Reineking B, Schröder B, Schurr FM, Wilson R. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography. 2007;30:609-628.

    Not in our library

  40. 40.

    Dormann CF, Roxburgh SH. Experimental evidence rejects pairwise modelling approach to coexistence in plant communities. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B. 2005;272:1279-1285.

    Not in our library10.1098/rspb.2005.3066

  41. 41.

    Engelkes T, Morrien E, Verhoeven KJF, Bezemer TM, Biere A, Harvey JA, McIntyre LM, Tamis WLM, van der Putten WH. Successful range-expanding plants experience less above-ground and below-ground enemy impact. Nature. 2008;456:946-948.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature07474

  42. 42.

    Engler R, Guisan A. MIGCLIM: predicting plant distribution and dispersal in a changing climate. Diversity and Distributions. 2009;15:590-601.

    Not in our library

  43. 43.

    Estes JA, Terborgh J, Brashares JS, Power ME, Berger J, Bond WJ, Carpenter SR, Essington TE, Holt RD, Jackson JBC, Marquis RJ, Oksanen L, Oksanen T, Paine RT, Pikitch EK, Ripple WJ, Sandin SA, Scheffer M, Schoener TW, Shurin JB, Sinclair ARE, Soule ME, Virtanen R, Wardle DA. Trophic downgrading of planet Earth. Science. 2011;333:301-306.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1205106

  44. 44.

    Ferrier S, Guisan A. Spatial modelling of biodiversity at the community level. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2006;43:393-404.

    Not in our library

  45. 45.

    Forchhammer MC, Post E, Berg TBG, Høye TT, Schmidt NM. Local-scale and short-term herbivore-plant spatial dynamics reflect influences of large-scale climate. Ecology. 2005;86:2644-2651.

    Not in our library

  46. 46.

    Gallien L, Münkemüller T, Albert CH, Boulangeat I, Thuiller W. Predicting potential distributions of invasive species: where to go from here? Diversity and Distributions. 2010;16:331-342.

    Not in our library

  47. 47.

    Ganem G, Litel C, Lenormand T. Variation in mate preference across a house mouse hybrid zone. Heredity. 2008;100:594-601.

    Not in our library10.1038/hdy.2008.20

  48. 48.

    Gilman SE, Urban MC, Tewksbury J, Gilchrist GW, Holt RD. A framework for community interactions under climate change. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2010;25:325-331.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tree.2010.03.002

  49. 49.

    Götzenberger L, de Bello F, Bråthen KA, Davison J, Dubuis A, Guisan A, Lepš J, Lindborg R, Moora M, Pärtel M, Pellissier L, Pottier J, Vittoz P, Zobel K, Zobel M. Ecological assembly rules in plant communities—approaches, patterns and prospects. Biological Reviews. 2012;87:111-127.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-185x.2011.00187.x

  50. 50.

    Greene WH. Econometric Analysis. 1993.

    Not in our library

  51. 51.

    van Grunsven RHA, van der Putten WH, Bezemer TM, Veenendaal EM. Plant-soil feedback of native and range-expanding plant species is insensitive to temperature. Oecologia. 2010;162:1059-1069.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00442-009-1526-3

  52. 52.

    Guisan A, Rahbek C. SESAM—a new framework integrating macroecological and species distribution models for predicting spatio-temporal patterns of species assemblages. Journal of Biogeography. 2011;38:1433-1444.

    Not in our library

  53. 53.

    Guisan A, Thuiller W. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters. 2005;8:993-1009.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x

  54. 54.

    Guisan A, Weiss SB, Weiss AD. GLM versus CCA spatial modeling of plant species distribution. Plant Ecology. 1999;143:107-122.

    Not in our library

  55. 55.

    Guisan A, Zimmermann NE. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling. 2000;135:147-186.

    Not in our library

  56. 56.

    Gutierrez D, Fernandez P, Seymour AS, Jordano D. Habitat distribution models: are mutualist distributions good predictors of their associates? Ecological Applications. 2005;15:3-18.

    Not in our library

  57. 57.

    Hawkins BA, Porter EE. Relative influences of current and historical factors on mammal and bird diversity patterns in deglaciated North America. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2003;12:475-481.

    Not in our library

  58. 58.

    Hayes RD, Farnell R, Ward RMP, Carey J, Dehn M, Kuzyk GW, Baer AM, Gardner CL, O…Donoghue M. Experimental reduction of wolves in the Yukon: ungulate responses and management implications. Wildlife Monographs. 2003;152:1-35.

    Not in our library

  59. 59.

    Heikkinen RK, Luoto M, Virkkala R, Pearson RG, Korber JH. Biotic interactions improve prediction of boreal bird distributions at macro-scales. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2007;16:754-763.

    Not in our library

  60. 60.

    Hemmer H, Kahlke RD, Vekua AK. The Old World puma—Puma pardoides (Owen, 1846) (Carnivora: Felidae)—in the Lower Villafranchian (Upper Pliocene) of Kvabebi (East Georgia, Transcaucasia) and its evolutionary and biogeographical significance. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Palaontologie. 2004;233:197-231.

    Not in our library

  61. 61.

    Hewitt GM. Post-glacial re-colonization of European biota. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 1999;68:87-112.

    Not in our library

  62. 62.

    Hirzel A, Guisan A. Which is the optimal sampling strategy for habitat suitability modelling. Ecological Modelling. 2002;157:331-341.

    Not in our library

  63. 63.

    Holt RD, Barfield M. Trophic interactions and range limits: the diverse roles of predation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B. 2009;276:1435-1442.

    Not in our library10.1098/rspb.2008.1536

  64. 64.

    Hultén E, Fries M. Atlas of the North European Vascular Plants. 1986.

    Not in our library

  65. 65.

    Hutchinson GE. Concluding remarks. Cold Springs Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. 1957;22:415-427.

    Not in our library

  66. 66.

    2010.

    Not in our library

  67. 67.

    Jablonski D. Biotic interactions and macroevolution: extensions and mismatches across scales and levels. Evolution. 2008;62:715-739.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00317.x

  68. 68.

    Johnson CN, Isaac JL, Fisher DO. Rarity of a top predator triggers continent-wide collapse of mammal prey: dingoes and marsupials in Australia. Proceedings of the Royal Society London Series B. 2007;274:341-346.

    Not in our library10.1098/rspb.2006.3711

  69. 69.

    Jones HP, Tershy BR, Zavaleta ES, Croll DA, Keitt BS, Finkelstein ME, Howald GR. Severity of the effects of invasive rats on seabirds: a global review. Conservation Biology. 2008;22:16-26.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00859.x

  70. 70.

    Josefsson M, Andersson B. The environmental consequences of alien species in the Swedish lakes Malaren, Hjalmaren, Vanern and Vattern. Ambio. 2001;30:514-521.

    Not in our library10.1579/0044-7447-30.8.514

  71. 71.

    Keane RM, Crawley MJ. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2002;17:164-170.

    Not in our library

  72. 72.

    Keith DA, Akçakaya HR, Thuiller W, Midgley GF, Pearson RG, Phillips SJ, Regan HM, Araújo MB, Rebelo TG. Predicting extinction risks under climate change: coupling stochastic population models with dynamic bioclimatic habitat models. Biology Letters. 2008;4:560-563.

    Not in our library10.1098/rsbl.2008.0049

  73. 73.

    Kissling WD, Rahbek C, Böhning-Gaese K. Food plant diversity as broad-scale determinant of avian frugivore richness. Proceedings of the Royal Society London Series B. 2007;274:799-808.

    Not in our library10.1098/rspb.2006.0311

  74. 74.

    Klironomos JN. Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature. 2002;417:67-70.

    Not in our library10.1038/417067a

  75. 75.

    Koenig WD, Haydock J. Oaks, acorns, and the geographical ecology of acorn woodpeckers. Journal of Biogeography. 1999;26:159-165.

    Not in our library

  76. 76.

    Lang G. Quartäre Vegetationsgeschichte Europas: Methoden und Erebnisse. 1994.

    Not in our library

  77. 77.

    Latimer AM, Banerjee S, Sang H, Mosher ES, Silander JA. Hierarchical models facilitate spatial analysis of large data sets: a case study on invasive plant species in the northeastern United States. Ecology Letters. 2009;12:144-154.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01270.x

  78. 78.

    Leathwick JR, Austin MP. Competitive interactions between tree species in New Zealand's old-growth indigenous forests. Ecology. 2001;82:2560-2573.

    Not in our library

  79. 79.

    Lischke H, Zimmermann NE, Bolliger J, Rickebusch S, Löffler TJ. TreeMig: a forest-landscape model for simulating spatio-temporal patterns from stand to landscape scale. Ecological Modelling. 2006;199:409-420.

    Not in our library

  80. 80.

    Lortie CJ, Brooker RW, Choler P, Kikvidze Z, Michalet R, Pugnaire FI, Callaway RM. Rethinking plant community theory. Oikos. 2004;107:433-438.

    Not in our library

  81. 81.

    Lovett GM, Camja CD, Arthur MA, Weathers KC, Fitzhugh RD. Forest ecosystem responses to exotic pests and pathogens in Eastern North America. BioScience. 2006;56:395-405.

    Not in our library

  82. 82.

    Maas MC, Krause DW, Strait SG. The decline and extinction of Plesiadapiformes (Mammalia: ?Primates) in North America: displacement or replacement? Paleobiology. 1988;14:410-431.

    Not in our library

  83. 83.

    MacFadden BJ. Extinct mammalian biodiversity of the ancient New World tropics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2006;21:157-165.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tree.2005.12.003

  84. 84.

    Maestre FT, Bowker MA, Escolar C, Puche MD, Soliveres S, Maltez-Mouro S, Garcia-Palacios P, Castillo-Monroy AP, Martinez I, Escudero A. Do biotic interactions modulate ecosystem functioning along stress gradients? Insights from semi-arid plant and biological soil crust communities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London Series B. 2010;365:2057-2070.

    Not in our library10.1098/rstb.2010.0016

  85. 85.

    Malaeb ZA, Summers JK, Pugesek BH. Using structural equation modeling to investigate relationships among ecological variables. Environmental and Ecological Statistics. 2000;7:93-111.

    Not in our library

  86. 86.

    Maran T, Henttonen H. Why is the European mink (Mustela lutreola) disappearing?—A review of the process and hypotheses. Annals Zoologici Fennici. 1995;32:47-54.

    Not in our library

  87. 87.

    McGill BJ, Etienne RS, Gray JS, Alonso D, Anderson MJ, Benecha HK, Dornelas M, Enquist BJ, Green JL, He FL, Hurlbert AH, Magurran AE, Marquet PA, Maurer BA, Ostling A, Soykan CU, Ugland KI, White EP. Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. Ecology Letters. 2007;10:995-1015.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01094.x

  88. 88.

    Meier ES, Edwards TC, Kienast F, Dobbertin M, Zimmermann NE. Co-occurrence patterns of trees along macro-climatic gradients and their potential influence on the present and future distribution of Fagus sylvatica L. Journal of Biogeography. 2010a;38:371-382.

    Not in our library

  89. 89.

    Meier ES, Kienast F, Pearman PB, Svenning J-C, Thuiller W, Araújo MB, Guisan A, Zimmermann NE. Biotic and abiotic variables show little redundancy in explaining tree species distributions. Ecography. 2010b;33:1038-1048.

    Not in our library

  90. 90.

    Mellars P. Neanderthals and the modern human colonization of Europe. Nature. 2004;432:461-465.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature03103

  91. 91.

    Michalet R, Brooker RW, Cavieres LA, Kikvidze Z, Lortie CJ, Pugnaire FI, Valiente-Banuet A, Callaway RM. Do biotic interactions shape both sides of the humped-back model of species richness in plant communities? Ecology Letters. 2006;9:767-773.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00935.x

  92. 92.

    Midgley GF, Davies ID, Albert CH, Altwegg R, Hannah L, Hughes GO, O…Halloran LR, Seo C, Thorne JH, Thuiller W. BioMove: an integrated platform simulating the dynamic response of species to environmental change. Ecography. 2010;33:612-616.

    Not in our library

  93. 93.

    Mitchell-Jones AJ, Amori G, Bogdanowicz W, Kryštufek B, Reijnders PJH, Spitzenberger F, Stubbe M, Thissen JBM, Vohralík V, Zima J. .The Atlas of European Mammals. 1999.

    Not in our library

  94. 94.

    Morgan GS, Lucas SG. Mammalian biochronology of Blancan and Irvingtonian (Pliocene and Early Pleistocene) faunas from New Mexico. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 2003;279:269-320.

    Not in our library

  95. 95.

    Morin X, Chuine I. Sensitivity analysis of the tree distribution model PHENOFIT to climatic input characteristics: implications for climate impact assessment. Global Change Biology. 2005;11:1493-1503.

    Not in our library

  96. 96.

    Mouillot D, Mason NWH, Wilson JB. Is the abundance of species determined by their functional traits? A new method with a test using plant communities. Oecologia. 2007;152:729-737.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00442-007-0688-0

  97. 97.

    Novotny V, Drozd P, Miller SE, Kulfan M, Janda M, Basset Y, Weiblen GD. Why are there so many species of herbivorous insects in tropical rainforests? Science. 2006;313:1115-1118.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1129237

  98. 98.

    Nunez MA, Horton TR, Simberloff D. Lack of belowground mutualisms hinders Pinaceae invasions. Ecology. 2009;90:2352-2359.

    Not in our library10.1890/08-2139.1

  99. 99.

    Ovaskainen O, Hottola J, Siitonen J. Modeling species co-occurrence by multivariate logistic regression generates new hypotheses on fungal interactions. Ecology. 2010;91:2514-2521.

    Not in our library10.1890/10-0173.1

  100. 100.

    Paillet FL. Chestnut: history and ecology of a transformed species. Journal of Biogeography. 2002;29:1517-1530.

    Not in our library

  101. 101.

    Pearson RG, Dawson TP. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2003;12:361-371.

    Not in our library

  102. 102.

    Pellissier L, Brathen KA, Pottier J, Randin CF, Vittoz P, Dubuis A, Yoccoz NG, Alm T, Zimmermann NE, Guisan A. Species distribution models reveal apparent competitive and facilitative effects of a dominant species on the distribution of tundra plants. Ecography. 2010;33:1004-1014.

    Not in our library

  103. 103.

    Pellissier L, Pradervand JN, Pottier J, Dubois A, Maiorano L, Guisan A. Climate-based empirical models show biased predictions of butterfly communities along environmental gradients. Ecography. 2012;35:1-9.

    Not in our library

  104. 104.

    Peres-Neto PR, Olden JD, Jackson DA. Environmentally constrained null models: site suitability as occupancy criterion. Oikos. 2001;93:110-120.

    Not in our library

  105. 105.

    Preston KL, Rotenberry JT, Redak R, Allen MF. Habitat shifts of endangered species under altered climate conditions: importance of biotic interactions. Global Change Biology. 2008;14:1-15.

    Not in our library

  106. 106.

    Pulliam HR. On the relationship between niche and distribution. Ecology Letters. 2000;3:349-361.

    Not in our library

  107. 107.

    van der Putten WH, Klironomos JN, Wardle DA. Microbial ecology of biological invasions. The ISME Journal. 2007;1:28-37.

    Not in our library10.1038/ismej.2007.9

  108. 108.

    van der Putten WH, Macel M, Visser ME. Predicting species distribution and abundance responses to climate change: why it is essential to include biotic interactions across trophic levels. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London Series B. 2010;365:2025-2034.

    Not in our library10.1098/rstb.2010.0037

  109. 109.

    Rahbek C, Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK, Entsminger GL, Rangel TFLV, Graves GR. Predicting continental-scale patterns of bird species richness with spatially explicit models. Proceedings of the Royal Society London Series B. 2007;274:165-174.

    Not in our library10.1098/rspb.2006.3700

  110. 110.

    Randi E, Weiss S, Ferrand N. Phylogeography of South European mammals. Phylogeography of Southern European Refugia: Evolutionary Perspectives on the Origins and Conservation of European Biodiversity. 2007;101-126.

    Not in our library

  111. 111.

    Redfern JV, Ferguson MC, Becker EA, Hyrenbach KD, Good C, Barlow J, Kaschner K, Baumgartner MF, Forney KA, Ballance LT, Fauchald P, Halpin P, Hamazaki T, Pershing AJ, Qian SS, Read A, Reilly SB, Torres L, Werner F. Techniques for cetacean-habitat modeling. Marine Ecology-Progress Series. 2006;310:271-295.

    Not in our library

  112. 112.

    Reinhart KO, Packer A, van der Putten WH, Clay K. Plant-soil biota interactions and spatial distribution of black cherry in its native and invasive ranges. Ecology Letters. 2003;6:1046-1050.

    Not in our library

  113. 113.

    Reitz SR, Trumble JT. Competitive displacement among insects and arachnids. Annual Review of Entomology. 2002;47:435-465.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145227

  114. 114.

    Richardson DM, Allsopp N, D…Antonio CM, Milton SJ, Rejmanek M. Plant invasions—the role of mutualisms. Biological Reviews. 2000;75:65-93.

    Not in our library10.1017/s0006323199005435

  115. 115.

    Ricklefs RE. Community diversity—relative roles of local and regional processes. Science. 1987;235:167-171.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.235.4785.167

  116. 116.

    Ricklefs RE. Disintegration of the ecological community. The American Naturalist. 2008;172:741-750.

    Not in our library10.1086/593002

  117. 117.

    Ricklefs RE. Evolutionary diversification, coevolution between populations and their antagonists, and the filling of niche space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010a;107:1265-1272.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0913626107

  118. 118.

    Ricklefs RE. Host-pathogen coevolution, secondary sympatry and species diversification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London Series B. 2010b;365:1139-1147.

    Not in our library10.1098/rstb.2009.0279

  119. 119.

    Ricklefs RE, Schluter D, Ricklefs RE, Schluter D. Species diversity: regional and historical influences. Species Diversity in Ecological Communities: Historical and Geographical Perspectives. 1993;350-363.

    Not in our library

  120. 120.

    Rüger N, Gutierrez AG, Kissling WD, Armesto JJ, Huth A. Ecological impacts of different harvesting scenarios for temperate evergreen rain forest in southern Chile—A simulation experiment. Forest Ecology and Management. 2007;252:52-66.

    Not in our library

  121. 121.

    Santucci F, Emerson BC, Hewitt GM. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of European hedgehogs. Molecular Ecology. 1998;7:1163-1172.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00436.x

  122. 122.

    Schaminee JHJ, Hennekens SM, Chytry M, Rodwell JS. Vegetation-plot data and databases in Europe: an overview. Preslia. 2009;81:173-185.

    Not in our library

  123. 123.

    Schneider H, Schuettpelz E, Pryer KM, Cranfill R, Magallon S, Lupia R. Ferns diversified in the shadow of angiosperms. Nature. 2004;428:553-557.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature02361

  124. 124.

    Schuettpelz E, Pryer KM. Evidence for a Cenozoic radiation of ferns in an angiosperm-dominated canopy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106:11200-11205.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0811136106

  125. 125.

    Schweiger O, Biesmeijer JC, Bommarco R, Hickler T, Hulme PE, Klotz S, Kühn I, Moora M, Nielsen A, Ohlemüller R, Petanidou T, Potts SG, Pyšek P, Stout JC, Sykes MT, Tscheulin T, Vilà M, Walther GR, Westphal C, Winter M, Zobel M, Settele J. Multiple stressors on biotic interactions: how climate change and alien species interact to affect pollination. Biological Reviews. 2010;85:777-795.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00125.x

  126. 126.

    Schweiger O, Heikkinen RK, Harpke A, Hickler T, Klotz S, Kudrna O, Kühn I, Poyry J, Settele J. Increasing range mismatching of interacting species under global change is related to species traits. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2011;21:88-99.

    Not in our library

  127. 127.

    Schweiger O, Settele J, Kudrna O, Klotz S, Kühn I. Climate change can cause spatial mismatch of trophically interacting species. Ecology. 2008;89:3472-3479.

    Not in our library10.1890/07-1748.1

  128. 128.

    Sebastian-Gonzalez E, Sanchez-Zapata JA, Botella F, Ovaskainen O. Testing the heterospecific attraction hypothesis with time-series data on species co-occurrence. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B. 2010;277:2983-2990.

    Not in our library10.1098/rspb.2010.0244

  129. 129.

    Shanahan M, Harrison RD, Yamuna R, Boen W, Thornton IWB. Colonization of an island volcano, Long Island, Papua New Guinea, and an emergent island, Motmot, in its caldera lake. V. Colonization by figs (Ficus spp.), their dispersers and pollinators. Journal of Biogeography. 2001;28:1365-1377.

    Not in our library

  130. 130.

    Shipley B. Cause and Correlation in Biology: A User's Guide to Path Analysis, Structural Equations and Causal Inference. 2011.

    Not in our library

  131. 131.

    Shipley B, Vile D, Garnier E. From plant traits to plant communities: a statistical mechanistic approach to biodiversity. Science. 2006;314:812-814.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1131344

  132. 132.

    Skerratt L, Berger L, Speare R, Cashins S, McDonald K, Phillott A, Hines H, Kenyon N. Spread of Chytridiomycosis has caused the rapid global gecline and extinction of frogs. EcoHealth. 2007;4:125-134.

    Not in our library

  133. 133.

    Smolik MG, Dullinger S, Essl F, Kleinbauer I, Leitner M, Peterseil J, Stadler LM, Vogl G. Integrating species distribution models and interacting particle systems to predict the spread of an invasive alien plant. Journal of Biogeography. 2010;37:411-422.

    Not in our library

  134. 134.

    Soberón JM. Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distributions of species. Ecology Letters. 2007;10:1115-1123.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01107.x

  135. 135.

    Stanley SM, Newman WA. Competitive exclusion in evolutionary time: the case of the acorn barnacles. Paleobiology. 1980;6:173-183.

    Not in our library

  136. 136.

    Stralberg D, Jongsomjit D, Howell CA, Snyder MA, Alexander JD, Wiens JA, Root TL. Re-shuffling of species with climate disruption: a no-analog future for California birds? PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e6825.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0006825

  137. 137.

    Suttle KB, Thomsen M, Power ME. Species interactions reverse grassland responses to changing climate. Science. 2007;315:640-642.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1136401

  138. 138.

    Thornton IWB, Compton SG, Wilson CN. The role of animals in the colonization of the Krakatau Islands by fig trees (Ficus species). Journal of Biogeography. 1996;23:577-592.

    Not in our library

  139. 139.

    Thuiller W, Albert C, Araújo MB, Berry PM, Cabeza M, Guisan A, Hickler T, Midgely GF, Paterson J, Schurr FM, Sykes MT, Zimmermann NE. Predicting global change impacts on plant species' distributions: future challenges. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics. 2008;9:137-152.

    Not in our library

  140. 140.

    Tompkins DM, Draycott RAH, Hudson PJ. Field evidence for apparent competition mediated via the shared parasites of two gamebird species. Ecology Letters. 2000a;3:10-14.

    Not in our library

  141. 141.

    Tompkins DM, Greenman JV, Robertson PA, Hudson PJ. The role of shared parasites in the exclusion of wildlife hosts: Heterakis gallinarum in the ring-necked pheasant and the grey partridge. Journal of Animal Ecology. 2000b;69:829-840.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00439.x

  142. 142.

    Tompkins DM, White AR, Boots M. Ecological replacement of native red squirrels by invasive greys driven by disease. Ecology Letters. 2003;6:189-196.

    Not in our library

  143. 143.

    Tylianakis JM, Didham RK, Bascompte J, Wardle D. Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology Letters. 2008;11:1351-1363.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01250.x

  144. 144.

    Valiente-Banuet A, Rumebe AV, Verdú M, Callaway RM. Modern quaternary plant lineages promote diversity through facilitation of ancient Tertiary lineages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;103:16812-16817.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0604933103

  145. 145.

    Vetaas OR. Realized and potential climate niches: a comparison of four Rhododendron tree species. Journal of Biogeography. 2002;29:545-554.

    Not in our library

  146. 146.

    Vislobokova I. On Pliocene faunas with Proboscideans in the territory of the former Soviet Union. Quaternary International. 2005;126:93-105.

    Not in our library

  147. 147.

    Walker DA, Raynolds MK. An International Arctic Vegetation Database: a Foundation for Panarctic Biodiversity Studies. 2011.

    Not in our library

  148. 148.

    Webb SD. Mammalian faunal dynamics of the Great American interchange. Paleobiology. 1976;2:220-234.

    Not in our library

  149. 149.

    Webb SD. The great American biotic interchange: patterns and processes. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 2006;93:245-257.

    Not in our library

  150. 150.

    Whittaker RJ. Communities and Ecosystems. 1975.

    Not in our library

  151. 151.

    Wiens JJ. The niche, biogeography and species interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B. 2011;366:2336-2350.

    Not in our library10.1098/rstb.2011.0059

  152. 152.

    Wilkinson DM. Mycorrhizal fungi and quaternary plant migrations. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters. 1998;7:137-140.

    Not in our library

  153. 153.

    Williams JW, Jackson ST. Novel climates, no-analog communities, and ecological surprises. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2007;5:475-482.

    Not in our library

  154. 154.

    Willis KJ, Whittaker RJ. Species diversity—Scale matters. Science. 2002;295:1245-1248.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1067335

  155. 155.

    Wootton JT. The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1994;25:443-466.

    Not in our library

  156. 156.

    Zimmermann NE, Edwards TC, Graham CH, Pearman PB, Svenning J-C. New trends in species distribution modelling. Ecography. 2010;33:985-989.

    Not in our library

  157. 157.

    Zobel M. The relative role of species pools in determining plant species richness: an alternative explanation of species coexistence? Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 1997;12:266-269.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0169-5347(97)01096-3

  158. 158.

    Zobel M, Pärtel M. What determines the relationship between plant diversity and habitat productivity? Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2008;17:679-684.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 6

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.