Overexpression of miR156 in switchgrass ( Panicum virgatum L.) results in various morphological alterations and leads to improved biomass production

Abstract

Summary Switchgrass ( Panicum virgatum L.) has been developed into a dedicated herbaceous bioenergy crop. Biomass yield is a major target trait for genetic improvement of switchgrass. microRNAs have emerged as a prominent class of gene regulatory factors that has the potential to improve complex traits such as biomass yield. A miR156b precursor was overexpressed in switchgrass. The effects of miR156 overexpression on SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN LIKE (SPL) genes were revealed by microarray and quantitative RT‐PCR analyses. Morphological alterations, biomass yield, saccharification efficiency and forage digestibility of the transgenic plants were characterized. miR156 controls apical dominance and floral transition in switchgrass by suppressing its target SPL genes. Relatively low levels of miR156 overexpression were sufficient to increase biomass yield while producing plants with normal flowering time. Moderate levels of miR156 led to improved biomass but the plants were non‐flowering. These two groups of plants produced 58%–101% more biomass yield compared with the control. However, high miR156 levels resulted in severely stunted growth. The degree of morphological alterations of the transgenic switchgrass depends on miR156 level. Compared with floral transition, a lower miR156 level is required to disrupt apical dominance. The improvement in biomass yield was mainly because of the increase in tiller number. Targeted overexpression of miR156 also improved solubilized sugar yield and forage digestibility, and offered an effective approach for transgene containment.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 53

1. 1.

   Abramson M, Shoseyov O, Shani Z. Plant cell wall reconstruction toward improved lignocellulosic production and processability. Plant Sci. 2010;178:61-72.

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   Alexandrova KS, Denchev PD, Conger BV. Micropropagation of switchgrass by node culture. Crop Sci. 1996;36:1709-1711.

   Not in our library10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183x003600060049x

3. 3.

   Biemelt S, Tschiersch H, Sonnewald U. Impact of altered gibberellin metabolism on biomass accumulation, lignin biosynthesis, and photosynthesis in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Physiol. 2004;135:254-265.

   Not in our library10.1104/pp.103.036988

4. 4.

   Bouton JH. Molecular breeding of switchgrass for use as a biofuel crop. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2007;17:553-558.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.gde.2007.08.012

5. 5.

   Chen X. Small RNAs and their roles in plant development. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2009;25:21-44.

   Not in our library10.1146/annurev.cellbio.042308.113417

6. 6.

   Chen F, Dixon RA. Lignin modification improves fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007;25:759-761.

   Not in our library10.1038/nbt1316

7. 7.

   Chuck G, Cigan AM, Saeteurn K, Hake S. The heterochronic maize mutant Corngrass1 results from overexpression of a tandem microRNA. Nat. Genet. 2007;39:544-549.

   Not in our library10.1038/ng2001

8. 8.

   Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 1987;19:11-15.

   Not in our library

9. 9.

   Dozmorov I, Centola M. An associative analysis of gene expression array data. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:204-211.

   Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.204

10. 10.

    Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 1956;28:350-356.

    Not in our library

11. 11.

    Fu C, Mielenz JR, Xiao X, Ge Y, Hamilton C, Rodriguez M, Chen F, Foston M, Ragauskas A, Bouton J, Dixon RA, Wang Z-Y. Genetic manipulation of lignin reduces recalcitrance and improves ethanol production from switchgrass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011a;108:3803-3808.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1100310108

12. 12.

    Fu C, Xiao X, Xi Y, Ge Y, Chen F, Bouton J, Dixon RA, Wang Z-Y. Downregulation of cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) leads to improved saccharification efficiency in switchgrass. Bioenerg. Res. 2011b;4:153-164.

    Not in our library

13. 13.

    Ge Y, Fu C, Bhandari H, Bouton J, Brummer EC, Wang Z-Y. Pollen viability and longevity of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). Crop Sci. 2011;51:2698-2705.

    Not in our library

14. 14.

    Gou J-Y, Felippes FF, Liu C-J, Weigel D, Wang J-W. Negative regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis by a miR156-targeted SPL transcription factor. Plant Cell Online. 2011;23:1512-1522.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.111.084525

15. 15.

    Guretzky J, Biermacher J, Cook B, Kering M, Mosali J. Switchgrass for forage and bioenergy: harvest and nitrogen rate effects on biomass yields and nutrient composition. Plant Soil. 2011;339:69-81.

    Not in our library

16. 16.

    Hatfield RD, Grabber J, Ralph J, Brei K. Using the acetyl bromide assay to determine lignin concentrations in herbaceous plants: some cautionary notes. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 1999;47:628-632.

    Not in our library10.1021/jf9808776

17. 17.

    Henry RJ. Evaluation of plant biomass resources available for replacement of fossil oil. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2010;8:288-293.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00482.x

18. 18.

    Hisano H, Nandakumar R, Wang Z-Y. Genetic modification of lignin biosynthesis for improved biofuel production. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant. 2009;45:306-313.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Jakob K, Zhou F, Paterson A. Genetic improvement of C4 grasses as cellulosic biofuel feedstocks. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant. 2009;45:291-305.

    Not in our library

20. 20.

    Jensen CS, Salchert K, Gao C, Andersen C, Didion T, Nielsen KK. Floral inhibition in red fescue (Festuca rubra L.) through expression of a heterologous flowering repressor from Lolium. Mol. Breed. 2004;13:37-48.

    Not in our library

21. 21.

    Jin S, Kanagaraj A, Verma D, Lange T, Daniell H. Release of hormones from conjugates: chloroplast expression of β-glucosidase results in elevated phytohormone levels associated with significant increase in biomass and protection from aphids or whiteflies conferred by sucrose esters. Plant Physiol. 2011;155:222-235.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.110.160754

22. 22.

    Kebeish R, Niessen M, Thiruveedhi K, Bari R, Hirsch H-J, Rosenkranz R, Stabler N, Schonfeld B, Kreuzaler F, Peterhansel C. Chloroplastic photorespiratory bypass increases photosynthesis and biomass production in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007;25:593-599.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt1299

23. 23.

    Koslowsky S, Riegler H, Bergmüller E, Zrenner R. Higher biomass accumulation by increasing phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase activity in Arabidopsis thaliana and Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2008;6:281-294.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00314.x

24. 24.

    Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M. MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief. Bioinforma. 2004;5:150-163.

    Not in our library10.1093/bib/5.2.150

25. 25.

    Li R, Qu R. High throughput Agrobacterium-mediated switchgrass transformation. Biomass Bioenerg. 2011;35:1046-1054.

    Not in our library

26. 26.

    Mann DGJ, LaFayette PR, Abercrombie LL, King ZR, Mazarei M, Halter MC, Poovaiah CR, Baxter H, Shen H, Dixon RA, Parrott WA, Stewart CN. Gateway-compatible vectors for high-throughput gene functional analysis in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) and other monocot species. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2011;10:226-236.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00658.x

27. 27.

    Matts J, Jagadeeswaran G, Roe BA, Sunkar R. Identification of microRNAs and their targets in switchgrass, a model biofuel plant species. J. Plant Physiol. 2010;167:896-904.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jplph.2010.02.001

28. 28.

    McLaughlin SB, Kiniry JR, Taliaferro CM, De La Torre Ugarte D, Donald LS. Projecting yield and utilization potential of switchgrass as an energy crop. Adv. Agron. 2006;90:267-297.

    Not in our library

29. 29.

    Moore KJ, Moser LE, Vogel KP, Waller SS, Johnson BE, Pedersen JF. Describing and quantifying growth stages of perennial forage grasses. Agron. J. 1991;83:1073-1077.

    Not in our library

30. 30.

    Park W, Li J, Song R, Messing J, Chen X. CARPEL FACTORY, a dicer homolog, and HEN1, a novel protein, act in microRNA metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Biol. 2002;12:1484-1495.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01017-5

31. 31.

    Poethig RS. Small RNAs and developmental timing in plants. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2009;19:374-378.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.gde.2009.06.001

32. 32.

    Rhoades MW, Reinhart BJ, Lim LP, Burge CB, Bartel B, Bartel DP. Prediction of plant MicroRNA targets. Cell. 2002;110:513-520.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00863-2

33. 33.
    Downregulation of cinnamyl-alcohol dehydrogenase in switchgrass by RNA silencing results in enhanced glucose release after cellulase treatment. · 2011

    Not checked
34. 34.

    Sakamoto T, Morinaka Y, Ohnishi T, Sunohara H, Fujioka S, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Mizutani M, Sakata K, Takatsuto S, Yoshida S, Tanaka H, Kitano H, Matsuoka M. Erect leaves caused by brassinosteroid deficiency increase biomass production and grain yield in rice. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006;24:105-109.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt1173

35. 35.

    Schmer MR, Vogel KP, Mitchell RB, Perrin RK. Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008;105:464-469.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0704767105

36. 36.

    Schwab R, Palatnik JF, Riester M, Schommer C, Schmid M, Weigel D. Specific effects of MicroRNAs on the plant transcriptome. Dev. Cell. 2005;8:517-527.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.devcel.2005.01.018

37. 37.

    Schwarz S, Grande A, Bujdoso N, Saedler H, Huijser P. The microRNA regulated SBP-box genes SPL9 and SPL15 control shoot maturation in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2008;67:183-195.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11103-008-9310-z

38. 38.

    Shikata M, Koyama T, Mitsuda N, Ohme-Takagi M. Arabidopsis SBP-Box genes SPL10SPL11 and SPL2 control morphological change in association with shoot maturation in the reproductive phase. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009;50:2133-2145.

    Not in our library10.1093/pcp/pcp148

39. 39.

    Somerville C, Youngs H, Taylor C, Davis SC, Long SP. Feedstocks for lignocellulosic biofuels. Science. 2010;329:790-792.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1189268

40. 40.

    Spangenberg G, Wang Z-Y, Potrykus I. Biotechnology in Forage and Turf Grass Improvement. 1998.

    Not in our library

41. 41.

    Stewart CN. Biofuels and biocontainment. Nat. Biotech. 2007;25:283-284.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt0307-283

42. 42.

    Strauss SH, Kershen DL, Bouton JH, Redick TP, Tan H, Sedjo RA. Far-reaching deleterious impacts of regulations on research and environmental studies of recombinant DNA-modified perennial biofuel crops in the United States. Bioscience. 2010;60:729-741.

    Not in our library

43. 43.
    Protocol: a highly sensitive RT-PCR method for detection and quantification of microRNAs · 2007

    No notice
44. 44.

    Wang Z-Y, Ge Y. Recent advances in genetic transformation of forage and turf grasses. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant. 2006;42:1-18.

    Not in our library

45. 45.

    Wang J-W, Czech B, Weigel D. miR156-regulated SPL transcription factors define an endogenous flowering pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell. 2009;138:738-749.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.014

46. 46.

    Wang H, Avci U, Nakashima J, Hahn MG, Chen F, Dixon RA. Mutation of WRKY transcription factors initiates pith secondary wall formation and increases stem biomass in dicotyledonous plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010;107:22338-22343.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1016436107

47. 47.

    Wu G, Park MY, Conway SR, Wang J-W, Weigel D, Poethig RS. The sequential action of miR156 and miR172 regulates developmental timing in Arabidopsis. Cell. 2009;138:750-759.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.031

48. 48.

    Xi Y, Fu C, Ge Y, Nandakumar R, Hisano H, Bouton J, Wang Z-Y. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of switchgrass and inheritance of the transgenes. Bioenerg. Res. 2009;2:275-283.

    Not in our library

49. 49.

    Xie K, Wu Can, Xiong L. Genomic organization, differential expression, and interaction of SQUAMOSA Promoter-Binding-Like tanscription factors and microRNA156 in rice. Plant Physiol. 2006;142:280-293.

    Not in our library10.1104/pp.106.084475

50. 50.

    Xing S, Salinas M, Hohmann S, Berndtgen R, Huijser P. miR156-targeted and nontargeted SBP-Box transcription factors act in concert to secure male fertility in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2010;22:3935-3950.

    Not in our library10.1105/tpc.110.079343

51. 51.

    Xu B, Escamilla-Treviño LL, Sathitsuksanoh N, Shen Z, Shen H, Zhang YHP, Dixon RA, Zhao B. Silencing of 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase in switchgrass leads to reduced lignin content and improved fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production. New Phytol. 2011;192:611-625.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03830.x

52. 52.

    Yuan JS, Tiller KH, Al-Ahmad H, Stewart NR, Stewart CN. Plants to power: bioenergy to fuel the future. Trends Plant Sci. 2008;13:421-429.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tplants.2008.06.001

53. 53.

    Zhang B, Pan X, Cobb GP, Anderson TA. Plant microRNA: a small regulatory molecule with big impact. Dev. Biol. 2006;289:3-16.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.10.036

Cited by papers we hold 5

• The miR156/SPL module regulates apple salt stress tolerance by activating MdWRKY100 expression · 2020
  No notice
• Functional Roles of microRNAs in Agronomically Important Plants—Potential as Targets for Crop Improvement and Protection · 2017
  No notice
• Small RNAs in plants: recent development and application for crop improvement · 2015
  No notice
• Shaping plant architecture · 2015
  No notice
• Functional Evolution in the Plant SQUAMOSA-PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE (SPL) Gene Family · 2013
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.