Are specialists at risk under environmental change? Neoecological, paleoecological and phylogenetic approaches

Abstract

The question ‘what renders a species extinction prone’ is crucial to biologists. Ecological specialization has been suggested as a major constraint impeding the response of species to environmental changes. Most neoecological studies indicate that specialists suffer declines under recent environmental changes. This was confirmed by many paleoecological studies investigating longer‐term survival. However, phylogeneticists, studying the entire histories of lineages, showed that specialists are not trapped in evolutionary dead ends and could even give rise to generalists. Conclusions from these approaches diverge possibly because (i) of approach‐specific biases, such as lack of standardization for sampling efforts (neoecology), lack of direct observations of specialization (paleoecology), or binary coding and prevalence of specialists (phylogenetics); (ii) neoecologists focus on habitat specialization; (iii) neoecologists focus on extinction of populations, phylogeneticists on persistence of entire clades through periods of varying extinction and speciation rates; (iv) many phylogeneticists study species in which specialization may result from a lack of constraints. We recommend integrating the three approaches by studying common datasets, and accounting for range‐size variation among species, and we suggest novel hypotheses on why certain specialists may not be particularly at risk and consequently why certain generalists deserve no less attention from conservationists than specialists.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 80

1. 1.

   Ackerly DD. Community assembly, niche conservatism, and adaptive evolution in changing environments. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2003;164:S165-S184.

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   Armbruster WS, Baldwin BG. Switch from specialized to generalized pollination. Nature. 1998;394:632.

   Not in our library

3. 3.

   Baumiller TK. Survivorship analysis of Paleozoic Crinoidea – effect of filter morphology on evolutionary rates. Paleobiology. 1993;19:304-321.

   Not in our library

4. 4.

   Ben-Halima T, Gillon Y, Louveaux A. Spécialisation trophique individuelle dans une population de Dociostaurus maroccanus (Orthopt.:Acrididae). Acta Oecol./Oecol. Gener. 1985;6:17-24.

   Not in our library

5. 5.

   Bernays EA. The value of being a resource specialist: behavioral support for a neural hypothesis. Am. Nat. 1998;151:451-464.

   Not in our library10.1086/286132 (opens in a new tab)

6. 6.

   Berthold P, Helbig AJ, Mohr G, Querner U. Rapid microevolution of migratory behavior in a wild bird species. Nature. 1992;360:668-670.

   Not in our library

7. 7.
   Parallel Declines in Pollinators and Insect-Pollinated Plants in Britain and the Netherlands · 2006

   Not checked
8. 8.

   Bofarull AM, Royo AA, Fernandez MH, Ortiz-Jaureguizar E, Morales J. Influence of continental history on the ecological specialization and macroevolutionary processes in the mammalian assemblage of South America: Differences between small and large mammals. BMC Evol. Biol. 2008;8:1471-2148.

   Not in our library10.1186/1471-2148-8-97 (opens in a new tab)

9. 9.

   Böhning-Gaese K, Oberrath R. Phylogenetic effects on morphological, life-history, behavioural and ecological traits of birds. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1999;1:347-364.

   Not in our library

10. 10.

    Brändle M, Prinzing A, Pfeifer R, Brandl R. Dietary niche breadth for Central European birds: correlations with species-specific traits. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2002;4:643-657.

    Not in our library

11. 11.

    Brooks DR, McLennan DA. The Nature of Diversity. 2002.

    Not in our library

12. 12.

    Brown JH. Macroecology. 1995.

    Not in our library

13. 13.

    Cope ED. The Primary Factors of Organic Evolution. 1896.

    Not in our library

14. 14.

    Crespi BJ, Sandoval CP. The phylogenetic evidence for the evolution of ecological specialization in Timema Walking-sticks. J. Evol. Biol. 2000;13:249-262.

    Not in our library

15. 15.

    Dyer LA, Singer MS, Lill JT, Stireman JO, Gentry GL, Marquis RJ, et al. Host specificity of Lepidoptera in tropical and temperate forests. Nature. 2007;448:696-699.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature05884 (opens in a new tab)

16. 16.

    Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Düll R, Wirth V, Werner W, Paulißen D. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. 1992.

    Not in our library

17. 17.

    Feranec RS. Ecological generalization during adaptive radiation: evidence from Neogene mammals. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2007;9:555-577.

    Not in our library

18. 18.

    Flessa KW, Powers KV, Cisne JL. Specialization and evolutionary longevity in the Arthropoda. Paleobiology. 1975;1:71-91.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Fontaine C, Collin CL, Dajoz I. Generalist foraging of pollinators: diet expansion at high density. J. Ecol. 2008;96:1002-1010.

    Not in our library

20. 20.

    Futuyma DJ, Fox CW, Roff DA, Fairbairn DJ. Ecological specialization and generalization. Evolutionary Ecology – Concepts and Case Studies. 2001;177-189.

    Not in our library

21. 21.

    Futuyma DJ, Moreno G. The evolution of ecological specialization. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1988;19:207-233.

    Not in our library

22. 22.

    Jablonski D. Lessons from the past: evolutionary impacts of mass extinctions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2001;98:5393-5398.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.101092598 (opens in a new tab)

23. 23.

    Jablonski D, Raup DM. Selectivity of end-Cretaceous marine bivalve extinctions. Science. 1995;268:389-391.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.11536722 (opens in a new tab)

24. 24.

    Janz N, Nyblom K, Nylin S. Evolutionary dynamics of host-plant specialization: a case study of the tribe Nymphalini. Evolution. 2001;55:783-796.

    Not in our library10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0783:edohps]2.0.co;2 (opens in a new tab)

25. 25.

    Jiguet F, Gadot AS, Julliard R, Newson SE, Couvet D. Climate envelope, life history traits and the resilience of birds facing global change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2007;13:672-1684.

    Not in our library

26. 26.

    Johnson KG, Budd AF, Stemann TA. Extinction selectivity and ecology of Neogene Caribbean reef corals. Paleobiology. 1995;21:52-73.

    Not in our library

27. 27.

    Julliard R, Jiguet F, Couvet D. Common birds facing global changes: what makes a species at risk? Glob. Chang. Biol. 2003;10:148-154.

    Not in our library

28. 28.

    Kammer TW, Baumiller TK, Ausich WI. Evolutionary significance of differential species longevity in Osagean-Meramecian (Mississippian) crinoid clades. Paleobiology. 1998;24:155-176.

    Not in our library

29. 29.

    Karban R. Plant behaviour and communication. Ecol. Lett. 2008;11:727-739.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01183.x (opens in a new tab)

30. 30.

    Keller G, Adatte T, Stinnesbeck W, Luciani V, Karoui-Yaakoub N, Zaghbib-Turki D. Paleoecology of the Cretaceous-Tertiary mass extinction in planktonic foraminifera. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 1998;178:257-297.

    Not in our library

31. 31.

    Kelley ST, Farrell BD. Is specialization a dead end? The phylogeny of host use in Dendroctonus bark beetles (Scolytidae). Evolution. 1998;52:1731-1743.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02253.x (opens in a new tab)

32. 32.

    Kiessling W, Baron-Szábo RC. Extinction and recovery patterns of sclerectinian corals at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. Paleogeogr. Paleoclimat. Paleoecol. 2004;214:195-223.

    Not in our library

33. 33.

    Klotz S, Kühn I, Durka W. BIOLFLOR – Eine Datenbank mit biologisch-ökologischen Merkmalen zur Flora von Deutschland. 2002.

    Not in our library

34. 34.

    Koh LP, Sodhi NS, Brook BW. Ecological correlates of extinction proneness in tropical butterflies. Conserv. Biol. 2004;18:1571-1578.

    Not in our library

35. 35.

    Labandeira CC, Johnson KR, Wilf P. Impact of the terminal Cretaceous event on plant-insect associations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002;99:2061-2066.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.042492999 (opens in a new tab)

36. 36.

    Leonard JA, Vila C, Fox-Dobbs K, Koch PL, Wayne RK, Van Valkenburgh B. Megafaunal extinctions and the disappearance of a specialized wolf ecomorph. Curr. Biol. 2007;17:1146-1150.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.072 (opens in a new tab)

37. 37.

    Liow LH. Does versatility as measured by geographic range, bathymetric range and morphological variability contribute to taxon longevity? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2007a;16:117-128.

    Not in our library

38. 38.

    Liow LH. Lineages with long durations are old and morphologically average: an analysis using multiple datasets. Evolution. 2007b;61:885-901.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00077.x (opens in a new tab)

39. 39.

    Losos JB, Irschick DJ, Schoener TW. Adaptation and constraints in the evolution of specialization of bahamian Anolis Lizards. Evolution. 1994;48:1786-1798.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb02214.x (opens in a new tab)

40. 40.

    Maddison WP, Midford PE, Otto SP. Estimating a binary character’s effect on speciation and extinction. Syst. Biol. 2007;56:701-710.

    Not in our library10.1080/10635150701607033 (opens in a new tab)

41. 41.

    McKinney M. Extinction vulnerability and selectivity: combining ecological and paleontological views. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1997;28:495-516.

    Not in our library

42. 42.

    Mitter C, Farrell B, Wiegmann B. The phylogenetic study of adaptive zones – has phytophagy promoted insect diversification? Am. Nat. 1988;132:107-128.

    Not in our library

43. 43.

    Moran NA. The evolution of host-plant alternation in Aphids: evidence for specialization as a dead end. Am. Nat. 1988;132:681-706.

    Not in our library

44. 44.

    Morse GE, Farrell BD. Ecological and evolutionary diversification of the seed beetle genus Stator (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae). Evolution. 2005;59:1315-1333.

    Not in our library

45. 45.

    Munday PL. Habitat loss, resource specialization, and extinction on coral reefs. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2004;10:1642-1647.

    Not in our library

46. 46.

    Munoz-Duran J. Correlates of speciation and extinction rates in the Carnivora. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2002;4:963-991.

    Not in our library

47. 47.

    Norris RD. Extinction selectivity and ecology in Planktonic-Foraminifera. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 1992;95:1-17.

    Not in our library

48. 48.

    Nosil P, Mooers AØ. Testing hypotheses about ecological specialization using phylogenetic trees. Evolution. 2005;59:2256-2263.

    Not in our library

49. 49.

    Novotny V, Drozd P, Miller SE, Kulfan M, Janda M, Basset Y, et al. Why are there so many species of herbivorous insects in tropical rainforests? Science. 2006;313:1115-1118.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1129237 (opens in a new tab)

50. 50.

    Oakley TH, Cunningham CW. Independent contrasts succeed where ancestral reconstruction fails in a known bacteriophage phylogeny. Evolution. 2000;54:397-405.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00042.x (opens in a new tab)

51. 51.

    Polly PD. Paleontology and the comparative method: ancestral node reconstructions versus observed node values. Am. Nat. 2001;157:596-609.

    Not in our library10.1086/320622 (opens in a new tab)

52. 52.

    Prinzing A. Are generalists pressed for time? An interspecific test of the Time-limited Disperser Model. Ecology. 2003;84:1744-1755.

    Not in our library

53. 53.

    Prinzing A, Durka W, Klotz S, Brandl R. Which species become aliens? Evol. Ecol. Res. 2002a;4:385-405.

    Not in our library

54. 54.

    Prinzing A, Durka W, Klotz S, Brandl R. Geographic variability of ecological niches of plant species: are competition and stress relevant? Ecography. 2002b;25:721-729.

    Not in our library

55. 55.

    Prinzing A, Ozinga W, Durka W. The relationship between the global and regional distribution of species changes during phylogeny. Evolution. 2004;58:2622-2633.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01616.x (opens in a new tab)

56. 56.

    Prinzing A, Reiffers R, Braakhekke WG, Hennekens SM, Tackenberg O, Ozinga WA, et al. Less lineages – more trait variation: phylogenetically clustered plant communities are functionally more diverse. Ecol. Lett. 2008;11:809-819.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01189.x (opens in a new tab)

57. 57.

    Rapoport EH. Areography: Geographical Strategies of Species. 1982.

    Not in our library

58. 58.

    Rezende EL, Lavabre JE, Guimaraes PR, Jordano P, Bascompte J. Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks. Nature. 2007;448:925-926.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature05956 (opens in a new tab)

59. 59.

    Rosenzweig ML. Species Diversity in Space and Time. 1995.

    Not in our library

60. 60.

    Safi K, Kerth G. A comparative analysis of specialization and extinction risk in temperate-zone bats. Conserv. Biol. 2004;18:1293-1299.

    Not in our library

61. 61.

    Sanchez B, Prado JL, Alberdi MT. Ancient feeding, ecology and extinction of Pleistocene horses from the Pampean Region. Ameghiniana. 2006;43:427-436.

    Not in our library

62. 62.

    Sargent RD, Vamosi JC. The influence of canopy position, pollinator syndrome, and region on evolutionary transitions in pollinator guild size. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2008;169:39-47.

    Not in our library

63. 63.

    Schluter D. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. 2000.

    Not in our library

64. 64.

    Simpson GG. Tempo and Mode in Evolution. 1944.

    Not in our library

65. 65.

    Smith AB, Jeffery CH. Selectivity of extinction among sea urchins at the end of the Cretaceous period. Nature. 1998;392:68-71.

    Not in our library

66. 66.

    Spitze K, Sadler TD. Evolution of a generalist genotype: multivariate analysis of the adaptiveness of phenotypic plasticity. Am. Nat. 1996;148:S108-S123.

    Not in our library

67. 67.

    Stephens PR, Wiens JJ. Ecological diversification and phylogeny of emydid Turtle. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2003;79:577-610.

    Not in our library

68. 68.

    Stireman JO. The evolution of generalization? Parasitoid flies and the perils of inferring host range evolution from phylogenies. J. Evol. Biol. 2005;18:325-336.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00850.x (opens in a new tab)

69. 69.

    Thompson JN. The Coevolutionary Process. 1994.

    Not in our library

70. 70.

    Vamosi JC, Wilson JRU. Nonrandom extinction leads to elevated loss of angiosperm evolutionary history. Ecol. Lett. 2008;11:1047-1053.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01215.x (opens in a new tab)

71. 71.

    Van Valkenburgh B, Wang X, Damuth J. Cope’s rule, hypercarnivory, and extinction in North American Canids. Science. 2004;306:101-104.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1102417 (opens in a new tab)

72. 72.

    Vrba ES. Ecology in relation to speciation rates. Some case histories of Miocene-Recent mammal clades. Evol. Ecol. 1987;1:283-300.

    Not in our library

73. 73.

    Walker KJ, Preston CD. Ecological predictors of extinction risk in the Flora of Lowland England, UK. Biodivers. Conserv. 2006;15:1913-1942.

    Not in our library

74. 74.

    Ward AA. Optimal habitat selection in time-limited dispersers. Am. Nat. 1986;129:568-579.

    Not in our library

75. 75.
    Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change · 2001

    No notice
76. 76.

    Webster AJ, Purvis A. Testing the accuracy of methods for reconstructing ancestral states of continuous characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B. 2002;269:143-149.

    Not in our library10.1098/rspb.2001.1873 (opens in a new tab)

77. 77.

    Wiens JJ, Graham CH. Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2005;36:519-539.

    Not in our library

78. 78.

    Williams P. Does specialization explain rarity among British bumblebees? A response to Goulson et al. Biol. Conserv. 2005;122:33-43.

    Not in our library

79. 79.

    Williams YM, Williams SE, Alford RA, Waycott M, Johnson CN. Niche breadth and geographical range: ecological compensation for geographical rarity in rainforest frogs. Biol. Lett. 2006;2:532-535.

    Not in our library10.1098/rsbl.2006.0541 (opens in a new tab)

80. 80.

    Zayed A, Packer L, Grixti JC, Ruz L, Owen RE, Toro H. Increased genetic differentiation in a specialist versus a generalist bee: implications for conservation. Conserv. Genet. 2005;6:1017-1026.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 2

• Enhancing dietary specialization metrics in observational studies of wild animal populations · 2020
  Not checked
• Beyond the Fragmentation Threshold Hypothesis: Regime Shifts in Biodiversity Across Fragmented Landscapes · 2010
  No notice

Questions about this paper

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.