Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Nov 3, 2026.

Niche width collapse in a resilient top predator following ecosystem fragmentation

Craig A. Layman, John P. Quattrochi, Caroline M. Peyer and 1 more

Ecology Letters · 2007

doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01087.x

Abstract

Much research has focused on identifying species that are susceptible to extinction following ecosystem fragmentation, yet even those species that persist in fragmented habitats may have fundamentally different ecological roles than conspecifics in unimpacted areas. Shifts in trophic role induced by fragmentation, especially of abundant top predators, could have transcendent impacts on food web architecture and stability, as well as ecosystem function. Here we use a novel measure of trophic niche width, based on stable isotope ratios, to assess effects of aquatic ecosystem fragmentation on trophic ecology of a resilient, dominant, top predator. We demonstrate collapse in trophic niche width of the predator in fragmented systems, a phenomenon related to significant reductions in diversity of potential prey taxa. Collapsed niche width reflects a homogenization of energy flow pathways to top predators, likely serving to destabilize remnant food webs and render apparently resilient top predators more susceptible to extinction through time.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 49

  1. 1.

    Adams AJ, Dahlgren CP, Kellison GT, Kendall MS, Layman CA, Ley JA, et al. Nursery function of tropical back-reef systems. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2006;318:287-301.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    Bearhop S, Adams CE, Waldron S, Fuller RA, Macleod H. Determining trophic niche width: a novel approach using stable isotope analysis. J. Anim. Ecol. 2004;73:1007-1012.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    Bolnick DI. Intraspecific competition favours niche width expansion in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 2001;410:463-466.

    Not in our library10.1038/35068555

  4. 4.

    Bolnick DI, Svanbäck R, Fordyce JA, Yang LH, Davis JM, Hulsey CD, et al. The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am. Nat. 2003;161:1-28.

    Not in our library10.1086/343878

  5. 5.

    Buchan KC. The Bahamas. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2000;41:94-111.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    Cardillo M, Mace GM, Jones KE, Bielby J, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Sechrest W, et al. Multiple causes of high extinction risk in large mammal species. Science. 2005;309:1239-1241.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1116030

  7. 7.

    Cocheret de la Morinière E, Pollux BJA, Nagelkerken I, Hemminga MA, Huiskes AHL, van der Velde G. Ontogenetic dietary changes of coral reef fishes in the mangrove-seagrass-reef continuum: stable isotopes and gut-content analysis. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2003;246:279-289.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    Cornwell WK, Schwilk DW, Ackerly DD. A trait-based test for habitat filtering: convex hull volume. Ecology. 2006;87:1465-1471.

    Not in our library10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1465:attfhf]2.0.co;2

  9. 9.

    Crooks KR, Sanjayan M, Crooks KR, Sanjayan M. Connectivity conservation: maintaining connections. Connectivity Conservation. 2006;1-19.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    Debinski DM, Holt RD. A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv. Biol. 2000;14:342-355.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Elton CS. Animal Ecology. 1927.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    Fahrig L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Sys. 2003;34:487-515.

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    Gonzalez A, Lawton JH, Gilbert FS, Blackburn TM, Evans-Freke I. Metapopulation dynamics, abundance, and distribution in a microecosystem. Science. 1998;281:2045-2047.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.281.5385.2045

  14. 14.

    Greathouse EA, Pringle CM, McDowell WH, Holmquist JG. Indirect upstream effects of dams: consequences of migratory consumer extirpation in Puerto Rico. Ecol. Appl. 2006;16:339-352.

    Not in our library10.1890/05-0243

  15. 15.

    Henle K, Davies KF, Kleyer M, Margules C, Settele J. Predictors of species sensitivity to fragmentation. Biodivers. Conserv. 2004;13:207-251.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Hopkins GW, Thacker JI, Dixon AFG, Waring P, Telfer MG. Identifying rarity in insects: the importance of host plant range. Biol. Conserv. 2002;105:293-307.

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    Layman CA, Silliman BR. Preliminary survey and diet analysis of juvenile fishes of an estuarine creek on Andros Island, Bahamas. Bull. Mar. Sci. 2002;70:199-210.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    Layman CA, Arrington DA, Langerhans RB, Silliman BR. Degree of fragmentation affects fish assemblage structure in Andros Island (Bahamas) estuaries. Caribb. J. Sci. 2004;40:232-244.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    Layman CA, Winemiller KO, Arrington DA, Jepsen DB. Body size and trophic position in a diverse tropical food web. Ecology. 2005;86:2530-2535.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    Layman CA, Arrington DA, Montaña CG, Post DM. Can stable isotope ratios provide quantitative measures of trophic diversity within food webs? Ecology. 2007;88:42-48.

    Not in our library10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[42:csirpf]2.0.co;2

  21. 21.

    Leibold MA. The niche concept revisited - mechanistic models and community context. Ecology. 1995;76:1371-1382.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    Lotze HK, Lenihan HS, Bourque BJ, Bradbury RH, Cooke RG, Kay MC, et al. Depletion, degradation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas. Science. 2006;312:1806-1809.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1128035

  23. 23.

    McCall DD, Rakocinski CF. Grass shrimp (Palaemonetes spp.) play a pivotal role in enhancing Ruppia Maritima. Ecology. 2007;88:618-624.

    Not in our library10.1890/06-0375

  24. 24.

    McCann K, Hastings A, Huxel GR. Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature. 1998;395:794-798.

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    McKinney ML. Extinction vulnerability and selectivity: combining ecological and paleontological views. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1997;28:495-516.

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    Micheli F, Halpern BS. Low functional redundancy in coastal marine assemblages. Ecol. Lett. 2005;8:391-400.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    Nilsson C, Reidy CA, Dynesius M, Revenga C. Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world’s large river systems. Science. 2005;308:405-408.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1107887

  28. 28.

    Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, et al. The natural flow regime. BioScience. 1997;47:769-784.

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    Post DM. The long and short of food-chain length. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002a;17:269-277.

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    Post DM. Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology. 2002b;83:703-718.

    Not in our library

  31. 31.

    Post DM, Conners DM, Goldberg DS. Prey preference by a top predator and the stability of linked food chains. Ecology. 2000a;81:8-14.

    Not in our library

  32. 32.

    Post DM, Pace ML, Hairston NGJ. Ecosystem size determines food-chain length in lakes. Nature. 2000b;405:1047-1049.

    Not in our library10.1038/35016565

  33. 33.

    Post DM, Layman CA, Arrington DA, Takimoto G, Montaña CG, Quattrochi J. Getting to the fat of the matter: models, methods and assumptions for dealing with lipids in stable isotope analyses. Oecologia. 2007;152:179-189.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00442-006-0630-x

  34. 34.

    Pounds JA, Bustamante MR, Coloma LA, Consuegra JA, Fogden MPL, Foster PN, et al. Widespread amphibian extinctions from epidemic disease driven by global warming. Nature. 2006;439:161-167.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature04246

  35. 35.

    Pringle CM. Hydrologic connectivity and the management of biological reserves: a global perspective. Ecol. Appl. 2001;11:981-998.

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    Pringle C, Crooks KR, Sanjayan M. Hydrologic connectivity: a neglected dimension of conservation biology. Connectivity Conservation. 2006;233-254.

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Cowlishaw G, Mace GM. Predicting extinction risk in declining species. Proc. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. 2000;267:1947-1952.

    Not in our library10.1098/rspb.2000.1234

  38. 38.

    Robinson SK, Thompson FR, Donovan TM, Whitehead DR, Faaborg J. Regional forest fragmentation and the nesting success of migratory birds. Science. 1995;267:1987-1990.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.267.5206.1987

  39. 39.

    Rooney N, McCann K, Gellner G, Moore JC. Structural asymmetry and the stability of diverse food webs. Nature. 2006;442:265-269.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature04887

  40. 40.

    Schmidt SN, Olden JD, Solomon CT, Vander Zanden MJ. Quantitative approaches to the study of stable isotope food web data. Ecology.

    Not in our library10.1890/07-0121.1

All 49 references

Cited by papers we hold 4

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.