Brain activation patterns associated with cue reactivity and craving in abstinent problem gamblers, heavy smokers and healthy controls: an fMRI study

Abstract

Abnormal cue reactivity is a central characteristic of addiction, associated with increased activity in motivation, attention and memory related brain circuits. In this neuroimaging study, cue reactivity in problem gamblers (PRG) was compared with cue reactivity in heavy smokers (HSM) and healthy controls (HC). A functional magnetic resonance imaging event‐related cue reactivity paradigm, consisting of gambling, smoking‐related and neutral pictures, was employed in 17 treatment‐seeking non‐smoking PRG, 18 non‐gambling HSM, and 17 non‐gambling and non‐smoking HC. Watching gambling pictures (relative to neutral pictures) was associated with higher brain activation in occipitotemporal areas, posterior cingulate cortex, parahippocampal gyrus and amygdala in PRG compared with HC and HSM. Subjective craving in PRG correlated positively with brain activation in left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and left insula. When comparing the HSM group with the two other groups, no significant differences in brain activity induced by smoking cues were found. In a stratified analysis, the HSM subgroup with higher Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence scores (FTND M = 5.4) showed higher brain activation in ventromedial prefrontal cortex, rostral anterior cingulate cortex, insula and middle/superior temporal gyrus while watching smoking‐related pictures (relative to neutral pictures) than the HSM subgroup with lower FTND scores (FTND M = 2.9) and than non‐smoking HC. Nicotine craving correlated with activation in left prefrontal and left amygdala when viewing smoking‐related pictures in HSM. Increased regional responsiveness to gambling pictures in brain regions linked to motivation and visual processing is present in PRG, similar to neural mechanisms underlying cue reactivity in substance dependence. Increased brain activation in related fronto‐limbic brain areas was present in HSM with higher FTND scores compared with HSM with lower FTND scores.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 47

1. 1.

   Beck AT, Steer RA, Ball R, Ranieri WF. Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories-IA and -II in Psychiatric Outpatients. J Pers Assess. 1996;67:588-597.

   Not in our library10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_13

2. 2.

   Breiter HC, Rosen BR. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of brain reward circuitry in the human. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;877:523-547.

   Not in our library10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09287.x

3. 3.

   Brody AL, Mandelkern MA, London ED, Childress AR, Lee GS, Bota RG, Ho ML, Saxena S, Baxter LR, Madsen D, Jarvik ME. Brain metabolic changes during cigarette craving. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59:1162-1172.

   Not in our library10.1001/archpsyc.59.12.1162

4. 4.

   Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1789-1795.

   Not in our library10.1001/archinte.158.16.1789

5. 5.

   Conners CK, Sparrow MA. Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS). 1999.

   Not in our library

6. 6.

   Cooney NL, Litt MD, Morse PA, Bauer LO, Gaupp L. Alcohol cue reactivity, negative-mood reactivity, and relapse in treated alcoholic men. J Abnorm Psychol. 1997;106:243-250.

   Not in our library10.1037//0021-843x.106.2.243

7. 7.

   Crockford DN, Goodyear B, Edwards J, Quickfall J, el-Guebaly N. Cue-induced brain activity in pathological gamblers. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;58:787-795.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.04.037

8. 8.

   David SP, Munafo MR, Johansen-Berg H, Smith SM, Rogers RD, Matthews PM, Walton RT. Ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens activation to smoking-related pictorial cues in smokers and nonsmokers: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;58:488-494.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.04.028

9. 9.

   de Ruiter MB, Veltman DJ, Goudriaan AE, Oosterlaan J, Sjoerds Z, van den Brink W. Response perseveration and ventral prefrontal sensitivity to reward and punishment in male problem gamblers and smokers. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009;34:1027-1038.

   Not in our library10.1038/npp.2008.175

10. 10.

    Due DL, Huettel SA, Hall WG, Rubin DC. Activation in mesolimbic and visuospatial neural circuits elicited by smoking cues: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:954-960.

    Not in our library10.1176/appi.ajp.159.6.954

11. 11.

    Franklin TR, Wang Z, Wang J, Sciortino N, Harper D, Li Y, Ehrman R, Kampman K, O'Brien CP, Detre JA, Childress AR. Limbic activation to cigarette smoking cues independent of nicotine withdrawal: a perfusion fMRI study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007;32:2301-2309.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.npp.1301371

12. 12.

    George MS, Anton RF, Bloomer C, Teneback C, Drobes DJ, Lorberbaum JP, Nahas Z, Vincent DJ. Activation of prefrontal cortex and anterior thalamus in alcoholic subjects on exposure tot alcohol-specific cues. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:345-352.

    Not in our library10.1001/archpsyc.58.4.345

13. 13.

    Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND. Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:1642-1652.

    Not in our library10.1176/appi.ajp.159.10.1642

14. 14.

    Goudriaan AE, Oosterlaan J, de Beurs E, van Den Brink W. Pathological gambling: a comprehensive review of biobehavioral findings. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004;28:123-141.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.001

15. 15.

    Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerstrom KO. The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991;86:1119-1127.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x

16. 16.

    Hodgins DC, el Guebaly N. Retrospective and prospective reports of precipitants to relapse in pathological gambling. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72:72-80.

    Not in our library10.1037/0022-006x.72.1.72

17. 17.

    Kalivas PW, Volkow ND. The neural basis of addiction: a pathology of motivation and choice. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:1403-1413.

    Not in our library10.1176/appi.ajp.162.8.1403

18. 18.

    Kilts CD, Gross RE, Ely TD, Drexler KP. The neural correlates of cue-induced craving in cocaine-dependent women. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:233-241.

    Not in our library10.1176/appi.ajp.161.2.233

19. 19.

    Kilts CD, Schweitzer JB, Quinn CK, Gross RE, Faber TL, Muhammad F, Ely TD, Hoffman JM, Drexler KP. Neural activity related to drug craving in cocaine addiction. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:334-341.

    Not in our library10.1001/archpsyc.58.4.334

20. 20.

    Kosten TR, Scanley BE, Tucker KA, Oliveto A, Prince C, Sinha R, Potenza MN, Skudlarski P, Wexler BE. Cue-induced brain activity changes and relapse in cocaine-dependent patients. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31:644-650.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.npp.1300851

21. 21.

    Ledgerwood DM, Petry NM. What do we know about relapse in pathological gambling? Clin Psychol Rev. 2006;26:216-228.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cpr.2005.11.008

22. 22.

    Lee JH, Lim Y, Wiederhold BK, Graham SJ. A functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) study of cue-induced smoking craving in virtual environments. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2005;30:195-204.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10484-005-6377-z

23. 23.

    Lesieur H, Blume SB. The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. Am J Psychiatry. 1987;144:1184-1188.

    Not in our library10.1176/ajp.144.9.1184

24. 24.

    McBride D, Barrett SP, Kelly JT, Aw A, Dagher A. Effects of expectancy and abstinence on the neural response to smoking cues in cigarette smokers: an fMRI study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31:2728-2738.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.npp.1301075

25. 25.

    McClernon FJ, Hiott FB, Huettel SA, Rose JE. Abstinence-induced changes in self-report craving correlate with event-related FMRI responses to smoking cues. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2005;30:1940-1947.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.npp.1300780

26. 26.

    McClernon FJ, Hutchison KE, Rose JE, Kozink RV. DRD4 VNTR polymorphism is associated with transient fMRI-BOLD responses to smoking cues. Psychopharmacol (Berl). 2007;194:433-441.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00213-007-0860-6

27. 27.

    McClernon FJ, Kozink RV, Rose JE. Individual differences in nicotine dependence, withdrawal symptoms, and sex predict transient fMRI-BOLD responses to smoking cues. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33:2148-2157.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.npp.1301618

28. 28.

    Marissen MA, Franken IH, Waters AJ, Blanken P, van den Brink W, Hendriks VM. Attentional bias predicts heroin relapse following treatment. Addiction. 2006;101:1306-1312.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01498.x

29. 29.

    Mudo G, Belluardo N, Fuxe K. Nicotinic receptor agonists as neuroprotective/neurotrophic drugs. Progress in molecular mechanisms. J Neural Transm. 2007;114:135-147.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00702-006-0561-z

30. 30.

    Myrick H, Anton RF, Li X, Henderson S, Drobes D, Voronin K, George MS. Differential brain activity in alcoholics and social drinkers to alcohol cues: relationship to craving. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004;29:393-402.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.npp.1300295

31. 31.

    Nichols T, Hayasaka S. Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review. Stat Methods Med Res. 2003;12:419-446.

    Not in our library10.1191/0962280203sm341ra

32. 32.

    Park MS, Sohn JH, Suk JA, Kim SH, Sohn S, Sparacio R. Brain substrates of craving to alcohol cues in subjects with alcohol use disorder. Alcohol Alcohol. 2007;42:417-422.

    Not in our library10.1093/alcalc/agl117

33. 33.

    Petry NM. Should the scope of addictive behaviors be broadened to include pathological gambling? Addiction. 2006;101(Suppl 1):152-160.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01593.x

34. 34.

    Petry NM, Kiluk BD. Suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in treatment-seeking pathological gamblers. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2002;190:462-469.

    Not in our library10.1097/01.nmd.0000022447.27689.96

35. 35.

    Potenza MN. Should addictive disorders include non-substance-related conditions? Addiction. 2006;101(Suppl 1):142-151.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01591.x

36. 36.

    Potenza MN, Fiellin DA, Heninger GR, Rounsaville BJ, Mazure CM. Gambling: an addictive behavior with health and primary care implications. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:721-732.

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10812.x

37. 37.

    Potenza MN, Steinberg MA, Skudlarski P, Fulbright RK, Lacadie CM, Wilber MK, Rounsaville BJ, Gore JC, Wexler BE. Gambling urges in pathological gambling: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60:828-836.

    Not in our library10.1001/archpsyc.60.8.828

38. 38.

    Reuter J, Raedler T, Rose M, Hand I, Glascher J, Buchel C. Pathological gambling is linked to reduced activation of the mesolimbic reward system. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:147-148.

    Not in our library10.1038/nn1378

39. 39.

    Robins L, Cottler L, Bucholz K, Compton W. Diagnostic Interview Schedule for DSM-IV (DIS-IV-Revision 11 Sep 1998). 1998.

    Not in our library

40. 40.

    Smolka MN, Buhler M, Klein S, Zimmermann U, Mann K, Heinz A, Braus DF. Severity of nicotine dependence modulates cue-induced brain activity in regions involved in motor preparation and imagery. Psychopharmacol (Berl). 2006;184:577-588.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00213-005-0080-x

Cited by papers we hold 3

• Gambling-like behavior in pigeons: ‘jackpot’ signals promote maladaptive risky choice · 2017
  Not checked
• Iowa Gambling Task (IGT): twenty years after – gambling disorder and IGT · 2013
  No notice
• Interactions between affective and cognitive processing systems in problematic gamblers: a functional connectivity study. · 2012
  Not checked

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.