A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species' traits and environment

Abstract

With the growing body of literature assessing the impact of invasive alien plants on resident species and ecosystems, a comprehensive assessment of the relationship between invasive species traits and environmental settings of invasion on the characteristics of impacts is needed. Based on 287 publications with 1551 individual cases that addressed the impact of 167 invasive plant species belonging to 49 families, we present the first global overview of frequencies of significant and non‐significant ecological impacts and their directions on 15 outcomes related to the responses of resident populations, species, communities and ecosystems. Species and community outcomes tend to decline following invasions, especially those for plants, but the abundance and richness of the soil biota, as well as concentrations of soil nutrients and water, more often increase than decrease following invasion. Data mining tools revealed that invasive plants exert consistent significant impacts on some outcomes (survival of resident biota, activity of resident animals, resident community productivity, mineral and nutrient content in plant tissues, and fire frequency and intensity), whereas for outcomes at the community level, such as species richness, diversity and soil resources, the significance of impacts is determined by interactions between species traits and the biome invaded. The latter outcomes are most likely to be impacted by annual grasses, and by wind pollinated trees invading mediterranean or tropical biomes. One of the clearest signals in this analysis is that invasive plants are far more likely to cause significant impacts on resident plant and animal richness on islands rather than mainland. This study shows that there is no universal measure of impact and the pattern observed depends on the ecological measure examined. Although impact is strongly context dependent, some species traits, especially life form, stature and pollination syndrome, may provide a means to predict impact, regardless of the particular habitat and geographical region invaded.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 77

1. 1.

   Bourg NA, McShea WJ, Gill DE. Putting a CART before the search: successful habitat prediction for a rare forest herb. Ecology. 2005;86:2793-2804.

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CG. Classification and Regression Trees. 1984.

   Not in our library

3. 3.

   Cutler DR, Edwards TC, Beard KH, Cutler A, Hess KT, Gibson J, Lawler JJ. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology. 2007;88:2783-2792.

   Not in our library10.1890/07-0539.1

4. 4.

   Daehler CC. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 2003;34:183-211.

   Not in our library

5. 5.

   Daehler CC, Carino DA. Predicting invasive plants: prospects for general screening system based on current regional models. Biological Invasions. 2000;2:93-102.

   Not in our library

6. 6.

   Daehler CC, Virtue JG. Likelihood and consequences: reframing the Australian weed risk assessment to reflect a standard model of risk. Plant Protection Quarterly. 2010;25:52-55.

   Not in our library

7. 7.

   Daehler CC, Denslow JS, Ansari S, Kuo H-C. A risk assesment system for screening out invasive pest plants from Hawai′i and other Pacific Islands. Conservation Biology. 2004;18:360-368.

   Not in our library

8. 8.

   D'Antonio CM, Vitousek PM. Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass fire cycle, and global change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 1992;23:63-87.

   Not in our library

9. 9.

   Davis M, Chew MK, Hobbs RJ, et al. Don't judge species on their origins. Nature. 2011;474:153-154.

   Not in our library10.1038/474153a

10. 10.

    De'ath G, Fabricius E. Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology. 2000;81:3178-3192.

    Not in our library

11. 11.

    Ehrenfeld JG. Effect of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems. 2003;6:503-523.

    Not in our library

12. 12.

    Ehrenfeld JG. Ecosystem consequences of biological invasions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 2010;41:59-80.

    Not in our library

13. 13.

    Ellenberg H. Vegetation Ecology of Central Europe. 1988.

    Not in our library

14. 14.

    Gaertner M, Breeyen AD, Hui C, Richardson DM. Impacts of alien plant invasions on species richness in Mediterranean-type ecosystems: a meta-analysis. Progress in Physical Geography. 2009;33:319-338.

    Not in our library

15. 15.

    Gerber E, Krebs C, Murrell C, Moretti M, Rocklin R, Schaffner U. Exotic invasive knotweeds (Fallopia spp.) negatively affect native plant and invertebrate assemblages in European riparian habitats. Biological Conservation. 2008;141:646-654.

    Not in our library

16. 16.

    Gimeno I, Vilà M, Hulme PE. Are islands more susceptible to plant invasion than continents? A test using Oxalis pes-caprae in the western Mediterranean. Journal of Biogeography. 2006;33:1559-1565.

    Not in our library

17. 17.

    Gordon DR, Onderdonk DA, Fox AM, Stocker RK. Consistent accuracy of the Australian weed risk assessment system across varied geographies. Diversity and Distributions. 2008;14:234-242.

    Not in our library

18. 18.

    Gozlan RE, Newton AC. Biological invasions: benefits versus risks. Science. 2009;324:1015.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.324_1015a

19. 19.

    de Groot M, Kleijn D, Jogan N. Species groups occupying different trophic levels respond differently to the invasion of semi-natural vegetation by Solidago canadensis. Biological Conservation. 2007;136:612-617.

    Not in our library

20. 20.

    Gurevitch J, Hedges LV. Statistical issues in conducting ecological metaanalyses. Ecology. 1999;80:1142-1149.

    Not in our library

21. 21.

    Gurevitch J, Hedges LV, Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J. Combining the results of independent experiments. Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments. 2001;347-369.

    Not in our library

22. 22.

    Harvey PH, Pagel MD. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. 1991.

    Not in our library

23. 23.

    Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. 1985.

    Not in our library

24. 24.

    Hejda M, Pyšek P. What is the impact of Impatiens glandulifera on species diversity of invaded riparian vegetation? Biological Conservation. 2006;132:143-152.

    Not in our library

25. 25.

    Hejda M, Pyšek P, Jarošík V. Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities. Journal of Ecology. 2009;97:393-403.

    Not in our library

26. 26.

    Hobbs RJ, Arico S, Aronson J, et al. Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2006;15:1-7.

    Not in our library

27. 27.

    Hochachka WM, Caruana R, Fink D, Munson A, Riedewald M, Sorokina D, Kelling S. Data-mining discovery of pattern and process in ecological systems. The Journal of Wildlife Management. 2007;71:2427-2437.

    Not in our library

28. 28.

    Hulme PE. Beyond control: wider implications for the management of biological invasions. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2006;43:835-847.

    Not in our library

29. 29.

    Hulme PE, Hester R, Harrison RM. Biological invasions in Europe: drivers, pressures, states, impacts and responses. Biodiversity under Threat. 2007;56-80.

    Not in our library

30. 30.

    Hulme PE, Richardson DM. Biosecurity: the changing face of invasion biology. Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: The Legacy of Charles Elton. 2011;301-314.

    Not in our library

31. 31.

    Hulme PE. Weed risk assessment: a way forward or a waste of time? Journal of Applied Ecology. 2012;49:10-19.

    Not in our library

32. 32.

    Hulme PE, Bremner ET. Assessing the impact of Impatiens glandulifera on riparian habitats: partitioning diversity components following species removal. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2006;43:43-50.

    Not in our library

33. 33.

    Hulme PE, Nentwig W, Pyšek P, Vilà M. Biological invasions: benefits versus risk response. Science. 2009a;324:1015-1016.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1171111

34. 34.

    Hulme PE, Pyšek P, Nentwig W, Vilà M. Will threat of biological invasions unite the European Union? Science. 2009b;324:40-41.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1171111

35. 35.

    Hurlbert SH. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs. 1984;54:187-211.

    Not in our library

36. 36.

    Inderjit, van der Putten WH. Impacts of soil microbial communities on exotic plant invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2010;25:512-519.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tree.2010.06.006

37. 37.

    Jarošík V, Simberloff D, Rejmánek M. CART and related methods. Encyclopedia of Biological Invasions. 2011;104-108.

    Not in our library

38. 38.

    Lambertini M, Leape J, Marton-Lefèvre J, et al. Invasives: a major conservation threat. Science. 2011;333:404-405.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.333.6041.404-b

39. 39.

    Levine JM, Vilà M, D'Antonio CM, Dukes JS, Grigulis K, Lavorel S. Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B. 2003;270:775-781.

    Not in our library10.1098/rspb.2003.2327

40. 40.

    Liao C, Peng R, Luo Y, et al. Altered ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycles by plant invasion: a meta-analysis. New Phytologist. 2007;177:706-714.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02290.x

41. 41.

    Lodge DM, Williams S, MacIsaac H, et al. Biological invasions: recommendations for policy and management. Ecological Applications. 2006;16:2034-2054.

    Not in our library10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2035:birfup]2.0.co;2

42. 42.

    Meffin R, Miller AL, Hulme PE, Duncan RP. Experimental introduction of the alien weed Hieracium lepidulum reveals no significant impact on montane plant communities in New Zealand. Diversity and Distributions. 2010;16:804-815.

    Not in our library

43. 43.

    Moravcová L, Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Havlíčková V, Zákravský P. Reproductive characteristics of neophytes in the Czech Republic: traits of invasive and non-invasive species. Preslia. 2010;82:365-390.

    Not in our library

44. 44.

    Olden JD, Poff NL. Toward a mechanistic understanding and prediction of biotic homogenization. American Naturalist. 2003;162:442-460.

    Not in our library10.1086/378212

45. 45.

    Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, et al. Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biological Invasions. 1999;1:3-19.

    Not in our library

46. 46.

    Pejchar L, Mooney HA. Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2009;24:497-504.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.016

47. 47.

    Pheloung PC, Williams PA, Halloy SR. A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. Journal of Environmental Management. 1999;57:239-251.

    Not in our library

48. 48.

    Powell KI, Chase JM, Knight TM. A synthesis of plant invasion effects on biodiversity across spatial scales. American Journal of Botany. 2011;98:539-548.

    Not in our library10.3732/ajb.1000402

49. 49.

    Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Nentwig W. Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? Biological Invasions. 2007;97-125.

    Not in our library

50. 50.

    Pyšek P, Richardson DM. Invasive species, environmental change and management, and health. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2010;35:25-55.

    Not in our library

51. 51.

    Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Pergl J, Jarošík V, Sixtová Z, Weber E. Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2008;23:237-244.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tree.2008.02.002

52. 52.

    Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Pergl J, et al. The global invasion success of Central European plants is related to distribution characteristics in their native range and species traits. Diversity and Distributions. 2009;15:891-903.

    Not in our library

53. 53.

    Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Hulme PE, et al. Disentangling the role of environmental and human pressures on biological invasions across Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:12157-12162.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1002314107

54. 54.

    Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Pergl J. Alien plants introduced by different pathways differ in invasion success: unintentional introductions as a threat to natural areas. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e24890.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0024890

55. 55.

    Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M, Barbour MG, Panetta FD, West CJ. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions. 2000;6:93-107.

    Not in our library

56. 56.

    Sax DF, Gaines SD. Species diversity: from global decreases to local increases. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2003;18:561-566.

    Not in our library

57. 57.

    Scherber C, Eisenhauer N, Weisser WW, et al. Bottom-up effects of plant diversity on multitrophic interactions in a biodiversity experiment. Nature. 2010;468:553-556.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature09492

58. 58.

    Schlaepfer MA, Sax DF, Olden JD. The potential conservation value of non-native species. Conservation Biology. 2011;25:428-437.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01646.x

59. 59.

    Schweiger O, Biesmeijer J, Bommarco B, et al. Multiple stressors on biotic interactions: how climate change and alien species interact to affect pollination. Biological Reviews. 2010;85:777-795.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00125.x

60. 60.

    Simberloff D, Alexander J, Allendorf F, et al. Non-natives: 141 scientists object. Nature. 2011;475:36.

    Not in our library10.1038/475036a

61. 61.

    Standish RJ, Robertson AW, Williams PA. The impact of an invasive weed Tradescantia fluminensis on native forest regeneration. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2001;38:1253-1263.

    Not in our library

62. 62.

    Steinberg G, Colla P. CART: Classification and Regression Trees. 1997.

    Not in our library

63. 63.

    Steinberg G, Golovnya M. CART 6.0 User's Manual. 2006.

    Not in our library

64. 64.

    Thiele J, Isermann M, Otte A, Kollmann J. Competitive displacement or biotic resistance? Disentangling relationships between community diversity and invasion success of tall herbs and shrubs. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2010a;21:213-220.

    Not in our library

65. 65.

    Thiele J, Kollmann J, Markussen B, Otte A. Impact assessment revisited: improving the theoretical basis for management of invasive alien species. Biological Invasions. 2010b;12:2025-2035.

    Not in our library

66. 66.

    Traveset A, Richardson DM. Biological invasions as disruptors of plant-animal reproductive mutualisms. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2006;21:208-216.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tree.2006.01.006

67. 67.

    Valtonen A, Jantunen J, Saarinen K. Flora and lepidoptera fauna adversely affected by invasive Lupinus polyphyllus along road verges. Biological Conservation. 2006;133:389-396.

    Not in our library

68. 68.

    Van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Schlaepfer D, Jeschke JM, Fischer M. Are invaders different? A conceptual framework of comparative approaches for assessing determinants of invasiveness. Ecology Letters. 2010;13:947-958.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01503.x

69. 69.

    Vilà M, Weber E, D'Antonio CM. Conservation implications of invasion by plant hybridization. Biological Invasions. 2000;2:207-217.

    Not in our library

70. 70.

    Vilà M, Tessier M, Suehs CM, et al. Local and regional assessments of the impacts of plant invaders on vegetation structure and soil properties of Mediterranean islands. Journal of Biogeography. 2006;33:853-861.

    Not in our library

71. 71.

    Vilà M, Basnou C, Pyšek P, et al. How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecological services? A pan-European cross-taxa assessment. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2009;8:135-144.

    Not in our library

72. 72.

    Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M, et al. Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecology Letters. 2011;14:702-708.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x

73. 73.

    Vitousek PM, Walker LR. Biological invasion by Myrica faya in Hawaii: plant demography, nitrogen fixation, ecosystem effects. Ecological Monographs. 1989;59:247-265.

    Not in our library

74. 74.

    Vitousek PM, Walker LR, Whitaker LD, Mueller-Dombois D, Matson PA. Biological invasion by Myrica faya alters ecosystem development in Hawaii. Science. 1987;238:802-804.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.238.4828.802

75. 75.

    Weber E. Invasive Plant Species of the World: A Reference Guide to Environmental Weeds. 2003.

    Not in our library

76. 76.

    Weber E, Gut D. Assessing the risk of potentially invasive plant species in central Europe. Journal for Nature Conservation. 2004;12:171-179.

    Not in our library

77. 77.

    Winter M, Schweiger O, Klotz S, et al. Plant extinctions and introductions lead to phylogenetic and taxonomic homogenization of the European flora. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106:21721-21725.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0907088106

Cited by papers we hold 11

• Molecular evidence for natural hybridization between Rumex crispus and R. obtusifolius (Polygonaceae) in Korea · 2022
  Not checked
• Simultaneous effect of habitat remnancy, exotic species, and anthropogenic disturbance on orchid diversity in South Australia · 2022
  Not checked
• Selective Native Plants of Oklahoma and Nearby States That Can Be a Nuisance to Occasionally Invasive · 2021
  Not checked
• Comparing environmental impacts of alien plants, insects and pathogens in protected riparian forests · 2021
  Not checked
• Contrasting alien effects on native diversity along biotic and abiotic gradients in an arid protected area · 2021
  Not checked
• Ecomorphological relationships and invasion history of non‐native terrestrial bird species on O‘ahu, Hawai‘i, suggest ecological fitting during novel community assembly · 2020
  Not checked
• Impact of an invasive alien plant on litter decomposition along a latitudinal gradient · 2018
  Not checked
• The Microbiome of Animals: Implications for Conservation Biology · 2016
  No notice
• A Unified Classification of Alien Species Based on the Magnitude of their Environmental Impacts · 2014
  No notice
• Resource competition in plant invasions: emerging patterns and research needs · 2014
  No notice
• Invasive species and the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation: how close has Brazil come to achieving Target 10?
  Not checked

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.