Effects of spatial smoothing on functional brain networks

Abstract

Graph‐theoretical methods have rapidly become a standard tool in studies of the structure and function of the human brain. Whereas the structural connectome can be fairly straightforwardly mapped onto a complex network, there are more degrees of freedom in constructing networks that represent functional connections between brain areas. For functional magnetic resonance imaging ( fMRI ) data, such networks are typically built by aggregating the blood‐oxygen‐level dependent signal time series of voxels into larger entities (such as Regions of Interest in some brain atlas) and determining their connection strengths from some measure of time‐series correlations. Although it is evident that the outcome must be affected by how the voxel‐level time series are treated at the preprocessing stage, there is a lack of systematic studies of the effects of preprocessing on network structure. Here, we focus on the effects of spatial smoothing , a standard preprocessing method for fMRI . We apply various levels of spatial smoothing to resting‐state fMRI data and measure the changes induced in functional networks. We show that the level of spatial smoothing clearly affects the degrees and other centrality measures of functional network nodes; these changes are non‐uniform, systematic, and depend on the geometry of the brain. The composition of the largest connected network component is also affected in a way that artificially increases the similarity of the networks of different subjects. Our conclusion is that wherever possible, spatial smoothing should be avoided when preprocessing fMRI data for network analysis.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 47

1. 1.

   Alexander‐Bloch, A., Lambiotte, R., Roberts, B., Giedd, J., Gogtay, N. & Bullmore, E. (2012a ) The discovery of population differences in network community structure: new methods and applications to brain functional networks in schizophrenia. NeuroImage, 59, 3889–3900.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.035

2. 2.

   Alexander‐Bloch, A.F., Vértes, P.E., Stidd, R., Lalonde, F., Clasen, L., Rapoport, J., Giedd, J., Bullmore, E.T. et al (2012b ) The anatomical distance of functional connections predicts brain network topology in health and schizophrenia. Cereb. Cortex, 23, 127–138.

   Not in our library10.1093/cercor/bhr388

3. 3.

   Andellini, M., Cannatà, V., Gazzellini, S., Bernardi, B. & Napolitano, A. (2015 ) Test–retest reliability of graph metrics of resting state MRI functional brain networks: a review. J. Neurosci. Methods, 253, 183–192.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.05.020

4. 4.

   Anderson, J.S., Druzgal, T.J., Froehlich, A., DuBray, M.B., Lange, N., Alexander, A.L., Abildskov, T., Nielsen, J.A. et al (2010 ) Decreased interhemispheric functional connectivity in autism. Cereb. Cortex, 21, 1134–1146.

   Not in our library10.1093/cercor/bhq190

5. 5.

   Aurich, N.K., Alves Filho, J.O., da Silva, A.M.M. & Franco, A.R. (2015 ) Evaluating the reliability of different preprocessing steps to estimate graph theoretical measures in resting state fMRI data. Front. Neurosci., 9, 48.

   Not in our library10.3389/fnins.2015.00048

6. 6.

   Bassett, D.S. & Bullmore, E.T. (2009 ) Human brain networks in health and disease. Curr. Opin. Neurol., 22, 340–347.

   Not in our library10.1097/wco.0b013e32832d93dd

7. 7.

   Bennett, C.M. & Miller, M.B. (2010 ) How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging? Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1191, 133–155.

   Not in our library10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05446.x

8. 8.

   Braun, U., Plichta, M.M., Esslinger, C., Sauer, C., Haddad, L., Grimm, O., Mier, D., Mohnke, S. et al (2012 ) Test–retest reliability of resting‐state connectivity network characteristics using fMRI and graph theoretical measures. NeuroImage, 59, 1404–1412.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.044

9. 9.

   Carp, J. (2012 ) The secret lives of experiments: methods reporting in the fMRI literature. NeuroImage, 63, 289–300.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.004

10. 10.

    Desikan, R.S., Ségonne, F., Fischl, B., Quinn, B.T., Dickerson, B.C., Blacker, D., Buckner, R.L., Dale, A.M. et al (2006 ) An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. NeuroImage, 31, 968–980.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021

11. 11.

    Di Martino, A., Yan, C.‐G., Li, Q., Denio, E., Castellanos, F.X., Alaerts, K., Anderson, J.S., Assaf, M. et al (2014 ) The autism brain imaging data exchange: towards a large‐scale evaluation of the intrinsic brain architecture in autism. Mol. Psychiatry, 19, 659–667.

    Not in our library10.1038/mp.2013.78

12. 12.

    Fornito, A., Zalesky, A. & Breakspear, M. (2013 ) Graph analysis of the human connectome: promise, progress, and pitfalls. NeuroImage, 80, 426–444.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.087

13. 13.

    Gallos, L.K., Makse, H.A. & Sigman, M. (2012 ) A small world of weak ties provides optimal global integration of self‐similar modules in functional brain networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 2825–2830.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1106612109

14. 14.

    Hagberg, A. A., Schult, D. A. & Swart, P. J. (2008 ). Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX In Varoquaux G., Vaught T. & Millman J. (Eds), Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy2008), Pasadena, CA, USA, pp. 11–15. Available at: http://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/scipy2008/

    Not in our library

15. 15.

    Hayasaka, S. (2013 ) Functional connectivity networks with and without global signal correction. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 7, 888.

    Not in our library10.3389/fnhum.2013.00880

16. 16.

    van den Heuvel, M.P., Stam, C.J., Boersma, M. & Pol, H.H. (2008 ) Small‐world and scale‐free organization of voxel‐based resting‐state functional connectivity in the human brain. NeuroImage, 43, 528–539.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.010

17. 17.

    Hopfinger, J.B., Büchel, C., Holmes, A.P. & Friston, K.J. (2000 ) A study of analysis parameters that influence the sensitivity of event‐related fMRI analyses. NeuroImage, 11, 326–333.

    Not in our library10.1006/nimg.2000.0549

18. 18.

    Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M. & Smith, S. (2002 ) Improved optimisation for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. NeuroImage, 17, 825–841.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1053-8119(02)91132-8

19. 19.

    Jenkinson, M., Beckmann, C.F., Behrens, T.E.J., Woolrich, M.W. & Smith, S.M. (2012 ) FSL. NeuroImage, 62, 782–790.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015

20. 20.

    Koziol, L.F. & Budding, D.E. (2009 ). Subcortical Structures and Cognition: Implications for Neuropsychological Assessment. Springer‐Verlag, New York.

    Not in our library

21. 21.

    Kujala, R., Glerean, E., Pan, R.K., Jääskeläinen, I.P., Sams, M. & Saramäki, J. (2016 ) Graph coarse‐graining reveals differences in the module‐level structure of functional brain networks. Eur. J. Neurosci., 44, 2673–2684.

    Not in our library10.1111/ejn.13392

22. 22.
    Eigenvector Centrality Mapping for Analyzing Connectivity Patterns in fMRI Data of the Human Brain · 2010

    No notice
23. 23.
    Changes in Community Structure of Resting State Functional Connectivity in Unipolar Depression · 2012

    No notice
24. 24.

    Mikl, M., Mareček, R., Hluštík, P., Pavlicová, M., Drastich, A., Chlebus, P., Brázdil, M. & Krupa, P. (2008 ) Effects of spatial smoothing on fMRI group inferences. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 26, 490–503.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mri.2007.08.006

25. 25.

    Molloy, E.K., Meyerand, M.E. & Birn, R.M. (2014 ) The influence of spatial resolution and smoothing on the detectability of resting‐state and task fMRI. NeuroImage, 86, 221–230.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.001

26. 26.

    Pajula, J. & Tohka, J. (2014 ) Effects of spatial smoothing on inter‐subject correlation based analysis of fMRI. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 32, 1114–1124.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mri.2014.06.001

27. 27.

    Papo, D., Zanin, M., Pineda‐Pardo, J.A., Boccaletti, S. & Buldú, J.M. (2014 ) Functional brain networks: great expectations, hard times and the big leap forward. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 369, 20130525.

    Not in our library10.1098/rstb.2013.0525

28. 28.

    Power, J.D., Barnes, K.A., Snyder, A.Z., Schlaggar, B.L. & Petersen, S.E. (2012 ) Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. NeuroImage, 59, 2142–2154.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018

29. 29.

    Power, J.D., Mitra, A., Laumann, T.O., Snyder, A.Z., Schlaggar, B.L. & Petersen, S.E. (2014 ) Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI. NeuroImage, 84, 320–341.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.048

30. 30.

    Rubinov, M. & Sporns, O. (2010 ) Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. NeuroImage, 52, 1059–1069.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003

31. 31.

    Scheinost, D., Papademetris, X. & Constable, R.T. (2014 ) The impact of image smoothness on intrinsic functional connectivity and head motion confounds. NeuroImage, 95, 13–21.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.035

32. 32.

    Shehzad, Z., Kelly, A.C., Reiss, P.T., Gee, D.G., Gotimer, K., Uddin, L.Q., Lee, S.H., Margulies, D.S. et al (2009 ) The resting brain: unconstrained yet reliable. Cereb. Cortex, 19, 2209–2229.

    Not in our library10.1093/cercor/bhn256

33. 33.

    Shirer, W.R., Jiang, H., Price, C.M., Ng, B. & Greicius, M.D. (2015 ) Optimization of rs‐fMRI pre‐processing for enhanced signal‐noise separation, test–retest reliability, and group discrimination. NeuroImage, 117, 67–79.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.015

34. 34.

    Silver, N.C. & Dunlap, W.P. (1987 ) Averaging correlation coefficients: should Fisher's z transformation be used? J. Appl. Psychol., 72, 146–148.

    Not in our library

35. 35.

    Smith, S.M., Jenkinson, M., Woolrich, M.W., Beckmann, C.F., Behrens, T.E., Johansen‐Berg, H., Bannister, P.R., De Luca, M. et al (2004 ) Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage, 23, S208–S219.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051

36. 36.

    Sporns, O. (2013a ) The human connectome: origins and challenges. NeuroImage, 80, 53–61.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.023

37. 37.

    Sporns, O. (2013b ) Network attributes for segregation and integration in the human brain. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 23, 162–171.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.conb.2012.11.015

38. 38.
    Defining nodes in complex brain networks · 2013

    No notice
39. 39.

    Telesford, Q.K., Morgan, A.R., Hayasaka, S., Simpson, S.L., Barret, W., Kraft, R.A., Mozolic, J.L. & Laurienti, P.J. (2010 ) Reproducibility of graph metrics in fMRI networks. Front. Neuroinform., 4, 117.

    Not in our library10.3389/fninf.2010.00117

40. 40.

    Tononi, G., Sporns, O. & Edelman, G.M. (1994 ) A measure for brain complexity: relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 5033–5037.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.91.11.5033

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.