Six Common Mistakes in Conservation Priority Setting

Abstract

A vast number of prioritization schemes have been developed to help conservation navigate tough decisions about the allocation of finite resources. However, the application of quantitative approaches to setting priorities in conservation frequently includes mistakes that can undermine their authors’ intention to be more rigorous and scientific in the way priorities are established and resources allocated. Drawing on well‐established principles of decision science, we highlight 6 mistakes commonly associated with setting priorities for conservation: not acknowledging conservation plans are prioritizations; trying to solve an ill‐defined problem; not prioritizing actions; arbitrariness; hidden value judgments; and not acknowledging risk of failure. We explain these mistakes and offer a path to help conservation planners avoid making the same mistakes in future prioritizations. Seis Errores Comunes en la Definición de Prioridades de Conservación

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 23

1. 1.

   Bell DE, Raiffa H, Tversky A. Decision making: descriptive, normative, and prescriptive interactions. 1988.

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, Da Fonseca GAB, Gerlach J, Hoffman M, Lamoreux JF, Mittermeier CG, Pilgrim JD, Rodrigues ASL. Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science. 2006;313::58-61.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1127609

3. 3.

   Burgman MA. Risks and decisions for conservation and environmental management. 2005.

   Not in our library

4. 4.

   Carwardine J, O'Connor T, Legge S, Mackey B, Possingham HP, Martin TG. Prioritizing threat management for biodiversity conservation. Conservation Letters. 2012;5:196-204.

   Not in our library

5. 5.

   Edwards W, Hogarth RM. Unfinished tasks: a research agenda for behavioural decision theory. Insights in decision making. 1990;44-65.

   Not in our library

6. 6.

   Failing L, Gregory R. Ten common mistakes in designing biodiversity indicators for forest policy. Journal of Environmental Management. 2003;68::121-132.

   Not in our library10.1016/s0301-4797(03)00014-8

7. 7.

   Game ET, Lipsett-Moore G, Saxon E, Peterson N, Sheppard S. Incorporating climate change adaptation into national conservation assessments. Global Change Biology. 2011;17::3150-3160.

   Not in our library

8. 8.

   Game ET, McDonald-Madden E, Puotinen ML, Possingham HP. Should we protect the strong or the weak? Risk, resilience and the selection of marine protected areas. Conservation Biology. 2008a;22::1619-1629.

   Not in our library10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01037.x

9. 9.

   Game ET, Watts M, Wooldridge S, Possingham H. Planning for persistence in marine reserves: a question of catastrophic importance. Ecological Applications. 2008b;18::670-680.

   Not in our library10.1890/07-1027.1

10. 10.

    Gilbert D. Buried by bad decisions. Nature. 2011;474::275-277.

    Not in our library10.1038/474275a

11. 11.

    Gregory R. Using stakeholder values to make smarter environmental decisions. Enviornment. 2000;42::34-44.

    Not in our library

12. 12.

    Gregory R, Failing L, Harstone M, Long G, McDaniels T, Ohlson D. Structured decision making: a practical guide to environmental management choices. 2012.

    Not in our library

13. 13.

    Joseph LN, Maloney RF, Possingham HP. Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species: a project prioritization protocol. Conservation Biology. 2009;23::328-338.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01124.x

14. 14.

    Keeney RL. Decision analysis: an overview. Operations Research. 1982;30::803-838.

    Not in our library10.1287/opre.30.5.803

15. 15.

    Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. 1993.

    Not in our library

16. 16.

    Kirkpatrick JB. An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biological Conservation. 1983;25::127-134.

    Not in our library

17. 17.

    Moore JL, Runge MC. Combining structured decision making and value-of-information analyses to identify robust management strategies. Conservation Biology. 2012;26::810-820.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01907.x

18. 18.

    Plous S. The psychology of judgment and decision making. 1993.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Redford KH, Taber S. Writing the wrongs: developing a safe-fail culture in conservation. Conservation Biology. 2000;14::1567-1568.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1523-1739.2000.01461.x

20. 20.

    Wilhere GF, Maguire LA, Scott JM, Rachlow JL, Goble DD, Svancara LK. Conflation of values and science: response to Noss et al. Conservation Biology. 2012;26::943-944.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01900.x

21. 21.

    Wilson KA, McBride MF, Bode M, Possingham HP. Prioritizing global conservation efforts. Nature. 2006;440::337-340.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature04366

22. 22.
    Conserving Biodiversity Efficiently: What to Do, Where, and When · 2007

    No notice
23. 23.

    Wolman AG. Measurement and meaningfulness in conservation science. Conservation Biology. 2006;20::1626-1634.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00531.x

Cited by papers we hold 2

• The potential spatiotemporal distribution patterns of Avena nuda and Avena sativa from global perspective provide new insights for the cultivation of commonly cultivated oats · 2025
  Not checked
• Common deficiencies of actions for managing invasive alien species: a decision-support checklist · 2019
  Not checked

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.