No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 20, 2026.
Phagocytic microglia and macrophages in brain injury and repair
Fang Yu, Yangfan Wang, Anne R. Stetler and 3 more
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics · 2022 · Review · CC BY
Abstract
Aims. Phagocytosis is the cellular digestion of extracellular particles, such as pathogens and dying cells, and is a key element in the evolution of central nervous system (CNS) disorders. Microglia and macrophages are the professional phagocytes of the CNS. By clearing toxic cellular debris and reshaping the extracellular matrix, microglia/macrophages help pilot the brain repair and functional recovery process. However, CNS resident and invading immune cells can also magnify tissue damage by igniting runaway inflammation and phagocytosing stressed—but viable—neurons.
Discussion. Microglia/macrophages help mediate intercellular communication and react quickly to the “find‐me” signals expressed by dead/dying neurons. The activated microglia/macrophages then migrate to the injury site to initiate the phagocytic process upon encountering “eat‐me” signals on the surfaces of endangered cells. Thus, healthy cells attempt to avoid inappropriate engulfment by expressing “do not‐eat‐me” signals. Microglia/macrophages also have the capacity to phagocytose immune cells that invade the injured brain (e.g., neutrophils) and to regulate their pro‐inflammatory properties. During brain recovery, microglia/macrophages engulf myelin debris, initiate synaptogenesis and neurogenesis, and sculpt a favorable extracellular matrix to support network rewiring, among other favorable roles. Here, we review the multilayered nature of phagocytotic microglia/macrophages, including the molecular and cellular mechanisms that govern microglia/macrophage‐induced phagocytosis in acute brain injury, and discuss strategies that tap into the therapeutic potential of this engulfment process.
Conclusion. Identification of biological targets that can temper neuroinflammation after brain injury without hindering the essential phagocytic functions of microglia/macrophages will expedite better medical management of the stroke recovery stage.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 20, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
INTRODUCTION
Phagocytosis is an essential biological process involving the engulfment of extracellular particles, such as bacteria or cell debris, into the phagocytic cell, where the enveloped particles undergo lysosomal degradation. Microglia/macrophages are the professional phagocytic cell populations of the central nervous system (CNS), with critical roles in shaping neurodevelopment, maintaining homeostasis, and regulating pathological processes such as acute brain injuries and other neurological disorders.
Acute brain injuries are associated with a high risk of mortality and disability. In addition to the initial site of injury, waves of cell dysfunction/death ripple through surrounding tissues and interconnected circuits. The buildup of toxic cell debris initiates profound inflammatory responses within the brain and sends distress signals to the body to recruit peripheral immune cells to the site of injury, including neutrophils and blood‐derived monocytes/macrophages.,, A persistent and exaggerated immune response triggered by dead brain cells and cellular debris may trigger self‐amplifying, uncontrolled neuroinflammatory cascades and hinder functional recovery after stroke. On the contrary, effective clearance of dead cells, myelin debris, and harmful cell components mitigates the release of cytotoxic and pro‐inflammatory markers, a process that is essential for functional recovery following brain injuries., Although peripheral immune cell infiltration is a major contributor in the pathogenesis of secondary brain injury, microglia are capable of engulfing infiltrating immune cells and their cellular components to control the accumulation of peripheral infiltrating immune cells in the injured brain.
Microglia/macrophage phagocytosis is the backbone of a natural compensatory response to brain injuries.,, Initially, phagocytosis was thought to be only beneficial but mounting evidence suggests that aspects of poststroke phagocytosis might also be detrimental.,,, For example, peri‐infarct stressed brain cells, including neurons that have the potential to recover and live, can also be phagocytosed by microglia/macrophages, thereby exacerbating neuronal loss and contributing to delayed brain atrophy and neurodegenerative changes. This detrimental aspect of phagocytosis following brain injuries might be further amplified by aging, when overactivated phagocytosis is associated with cognitive and memory impairments and progressive brain atrophy., The existence of both beneficial and detrimental mechanisms illustrates the complexity of microglia/macrophage phagocytosis in CNS disease. Other factors such as sex, aging, and disease progression may further complicate the function of phagocytes in brain injury.,, Thus, understanding microglia/macrophage‐associated phagocytosis after brain injury at the molecular and cellular levels may accelerate the discovery of better therapeutic strategies. In this review, we examine the available literature on microglial/macrophage phagocytosis in acute brain injuries, with a focus on the underlying mechanisms and therapeutic modalities that offer hope for clinical translation.
Signals that activate or hinder phagocytosis: “Find‐me,” “eat‐me,” and “do not‐eat‐me” signals
Dead or stressed neurons are known to release “find‐me” injury signals, such as nucleotides, sphingosine‐1‐phosphate (S1P), high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), lysophosphatidylcholine, and CX3CL1, to recruit neighboring microglia and blood‐derived macrophages to the brain injury sites. Dead/dying brain cells or cell debris has specific “eat‐me” tags that attract microglia/macrophages and trigger an inflammatory response and the phagocytic process. However, viable neural cells express “do not‐eat‐me” signals to deter aberrant “eat‐me” processes and mitigate phagocytic injury (Figure 1), as discussed below.
“Find‐me” signals
Damaged or stressed‐but‐viable neurons release nucleotides, such as adenosine triphosphate (ATP), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), or uridine triphosphate (UTP), as typical “find‐me” signals that guide microglia/macrophages to move or extend their processes toward the injury sites., During development, neuronally released nucleotides participate in synaptic pruning by activating the P2Y12 receptor on microglia. However, in the context of ischemic brain injury, the P2Y2 receptor for nucleotides is upregulated on microglia. Indeed, neurons release nucleotides under both physiological and pathological conditions, and this response might be associated with microglial activation.
Chemokine CX3CL1 (fractalkine) is a strong chemoattractant “find‐me” signal. Both neurons and synapses release CX3CL1 to activate the microglial CX3CR1 receptor. In neurological disorders such as stroke and Alzheimer's disease,, downregulation of microglial CX3CR1 signaling decreases the activation of CNS resident microglia and the recruitment of peripheral macrophages, thereby improving neurofunctional outcomes in rodent animal models. However, the impact of CX3CR1 is complex, because CX3CR1 depletion impairs microglial phagocytosis and causes synaptic dysfunction in the adult hippocampus. Furthermore, during neurodevelopment, CX3CL1‐CX3CR1 interactions and microglial phagocytosis are essential in synapse pruning; hence, disabling this pathway leads to insufficient or delayed phagocytosis and autism‐like behavior in mice.
Other “find‐me” signals such as sphingosine‐1‐phosphate (S1P) and lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) are related to macrophage recruitment after stroke, and dimerized ribosomal protein S19, endothelial monocyte‐activating polypeptide II, or tyrosyl rRNA synthetase (TyrRS) serve as broad “find‐me” signals that mainly induce macrophage phagocytosis in the periphery.
“Eat‐me” signals
Phosphatidylserine (PS) is a major phospholipid in the inner leaflet of the neuronal plasma membrane, and an essential “eat‐me” signal once flipped to the outer leaflet of endangered cells and exposed on their cell surface. Dead/dying cells or cell components actively display PS on the outer cell surface to induce microglia/macrophage phagocytosis., PS can also reversibly translocate to the surface of cells by translocases, thereby exposing the signal to surrounding microglia/macrophages. Type 4P‐typease (P4‐ATPase), ATP8A1 and ATP8A2 are gatekeepers of the “eat‐me” signals and prevent their exposure on the cell surface to avoid triggering phagocytosis. Oxidative stress, DNA damage, intracellular calcium buildup, ATP depletion, and caspase‐induced apoptotic cell changes can all cause irreversible translocation of PS to the cell surface and induction of microglial/macrophage phagocytosis.,, Although reversible PS exposure can occur in response to nontoxic stimuli, the persistent presence of PS on stressed‐but‐viable neurons might be associated with delayed neuronal death and long‐term neurodegenerative consequences in stroke. Thus, blockade of the steps involved in PS exposure might rescue endangered neurons and prevent neurodegeneration.
PS is recognized by engulfment receptors on phagocytes. Phagocytic PS receptors either directly recognize PS or interact with PS through bridging proteins. Several receptors such as the phosphatidylserine receptor (PSR), the T‐cell immunoglobulin and mucin (TIM) family members,, Stabilin2, and brain angiogenesis inhibitor I (BAI‐I), may directly recognize PS. Indirect PS recognition can also occur via bridging proteins such as milk fat globule‐EGF factor 8 (MFG‐E8) and growth arrest‐specific gene 6 (Gas6)., These bridging proteins have two binding domains that cross‐link PS with its receptors on phagocytes. For example, MFG‐E8 binds to PS on apoptotic neurons and engages integrin αvβ3 on microglia, resulting in microglial phagocytosis of apoptotic neurons. Gas6 bridges the PS on apoptotic cells to the Axl/Mer family of tyrosine kinases (Mer, Axl, and Tyro3) on microglia, thereby stimulating microglial clearance of apoptotic neurons.
It remains uncertain whether PS exposure alone is sufficient to induce phagocytosis. Some studies suggest that PS by itself can elicit phagocytic responses in macrophages; however, others show that not all cells with exposed PS are taken up by phagocytes., Thus, a second signal may work synergistically with PS. Alternatively, PS may have to be modified to induce phagocytosis.
Cell surface calreticulin is an alternative “eat‐me” signal and interacts with low‐density lipoprotein receptor‐related protein 1 (LRP1) on microglia/macrophages to initiate the phagocytic process., The calreticulin/LRP phagocytic signaling pathway is highly associated with the elimination of stressed‐but‐viable neurons and long‐term neuronal loss in stroke., In Aβ‐induced phagocytosis of live neurons in vitro, blocking calreticulin from the neuron surface or blocking LRP1 on microglia/macrophages successfully inhibited the death of live neurons by phagocytosis. In healthy brain cells, calreticulin is present predominantly in the endoplasmic reticulum, but it is translocated to the cell surface in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress, apoptosis, or pro‐inflammatory signaling., Calreticulin also serves as an opsonin that interacts with galactose on the surface of tumor cells and facilitates macrophage phagocytosis. However, free calreticulin can also bind to microglia and block microglial phagocytosis of neurons, offering a potential therapeutic strategy when calreticulin/LRP is overactivated and massive neuronal death ensues.
Complement, galectin‐3, and apolipoprotein E are essential opsonins that enhance phagocytosis by binding cell components or cells that are destined for engulfment. The complement component C1q strengthens signal recognition by binding to cell surface PS, calreticulin, or a desialylated cell surface, and promotes microglial phagocytosis through the production of C3b., C1q can also directly bind to the functional phagocytic receptor complement receptor 3 (CR3) on the microglial cell surface, and induce phagocytosis. In the CNS, complement proteins deposit on synapses and promote synaptic pruning or elimination during neurodevelopment or neurological disease., The key step in complement‐opsonin activation is the conversion of C3 to C3a and C3b, where C3a recruits and activates microglia, whereas C3b opsonizes synapses and neurons to be captured by microglial CR3.,,,
Galectin‐3 connects galactose residues found on the cell surface or cell debris with MER receptor tyrosine kinase (MerTK) on phagocytes. After ischemic brain injury, galectin‐3 is pivotal in mediating microglial activation and proliferation; galectin‐3 knockout significantly increases apoptotic neuron numbers by impairing microglial phagocytic ability. However, in traumatic brain injury (TBI), the release of galectin‐3 is associated with greater neuronal loss and worse neurological function.
In human cells, apoliprotein E (ApoE) was recently found to interact with the microglial TREM2 receptor. Brain cells that bind to ApoE promote microglial migration and enhance phagocytosis by activating the TREM2 receptor on microglia., In neurodevelopment, astrocytes express ApoE and regulate its phagocytic ability via interaction with ApoE, while participating in homeostatic synapse pruning, clearance, and turnover.
Do not‐eat‐me signals
Neuronal transmembrane protein CD47 and sialic acid are recognized “do not‐eat‐me” signals that counterbalance “eat‐me” signals and temper phagocytosis‐induced neuronal injury. CD47 interacts with signal‐regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα) on microglia/macrophages and inhibits phagocytosis. Apart from efferocytosis of apoptotic cells, the CD47‐SIRPα axis was recently found to participate in negative regulation of local membrane excision by microglia during developmental synaptic pruning., Synapses also express CD47 and escape microglial phagocytosis during development. Expression of CD47 on myelin debris may hinder its clearance and contribute to Wallerian degeneration. In hemorrhagic stroke, downregulation of CD47 expression boosts the number of phagocytic microglia/macrophages, enhances erythrocyte phagocytosis, and fosters the resolution of hematomas and other blood components.,,,, However, activation of CD47 may influence brain injury and recovery through other mechanisms. In ischemic stroke, the CD47 signaling pathway may contribute to neutrophil extravasation into the brain parenchyma and amplify neuroinflammation., After traumatic brain injury, CD47 is thought to modulate trans‐endothelial migration of neutrophils and cerebrovascular remodeling at late injury stages., The pleiotropic functions of CD47 in different brain cell types presents an opportunity to modulate spatially distinct aspects of inflammation by targeting a single molecule.
The cell surface of healthy neurons has sialic acid residues integrated into glycoproteins and glycolipids. Sialylation of the cell surface blocks phagocytosis by interacting with sialic acid‐binding immunoglobulin‐like lectins (SIGLECs) on the microglial cell surface and inhibiting the binding of certain opsonins, C1q, C3b, and galectins, whereas desialylated glycoprotein on neurons amplifies the “eat‐me” signal and promotes phagocytosis.
Other “do not‐eat‐me” signals include fractalkine, which is usually expressed by healthy brain cells. Conversely, stressed or damaged cells may lose fractalkine function and encourage inflammatory phagocytosis by microglia.
Microglia/macrophage receptors in the phagocytosis pathway
Specific microglia/macrophage receptors are engaged in different phagocytic processes., After brain injuries, removal of dead/dying or stressed‐but‐viable neurons requires the release of Milk Fat Globule Factor‐E8 (MFG‐E8) from microglia/macrophages. MFG‐E8 then recognizes phosphatidylserine “eat‐me” signals on neurons., Both MerTK and MEF‐E8 are transiently upregulated following transient brain ischemia. Vitronectin receptors (VNR) are also upregulated on the microglial surface in brain disorders and bind phosphatidylserine on the neuronal surface.
As microglia/macrophages engulf invading neutrophils or their debris, they are a major determinant of neutrophil accumulation after ischemic stroke. Microglial phagocytosis of invading neutrophils requires VNR and lectins. The physiological removal or remodeling of synapses and neurites during development or neuroplastic changes usually requires C1q, C3b and CR3, whereas clearance of neuronal precursors involves oxidant‐associated caspase activation, CR3 and DAP12.,, A comprehensive understanding of these distinct receptors and phagocytic pathways is especially important under conditions of brain injury.
Toll‐like receptors (TLRs)
Toll‐like receptors (TLRs) belong to the family of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), which recognize pathogen‐associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) to activate the innate immune response. Microglia/macrophage TLRs are also strong inflammatory receptors and induce production of pro‐inflammatory cytokines in the stroke brain. The observation that inflammatory receptors on microglia/macrophage initiate phagocytosis suggests that neuroinflammation and phagocytosis can interact and even join forces in various disease phases after injury.,, TLRs play a fundamental role in innate immune responses and are exclusively expressed on antigen presenting cells (APCs). Activation of TLR4 accelerates the clearance of myelin and premature engulfment of healthy neurons in Aβ‐induced phagocytosis. In neuroinflammation, stimulation of microglia with TLR ligands in vitro blunts their ability to distinguish between healthy and dead/dying neurons, thus promoting inappropriate cell phagocytosis., TLR‐activated microglia may release oxidants that cause target cells to expose PS as an “eat‐me” signal and upregulation of MFG‐E8, potentially magnifying phagocytic injury.,, Given that microglial TLR affects inflammation and phagocytosis, a better understanding of the roles of TLR in the brain is warranted, as targeting or modulating its effects may be beneficial in models of neurodegenerative disease.
Scavenger receptors
Scavenger receptors (SRs) are involved in the uptake of negatively charged macromolecules and low‐density lipoprotein (LDL). Microglial SRs include macrophage receptor with collagenous structure (MARCO), SR‐B3 (CD36), and macrosialin (CD68). The activation of MARCO triggers reorganization of the microglial cell cytoskeleton, which is critical for phagocytosis. Increased expression of MARCO in mouse cortex following ischemic stroke is consistent with microglial clearance of debris and degenerating cells in the stroke brain. In addition, stimulation of CD36 signaling can promote microglial phagocytic capacity and is an important mechanism underlying blood clearance after intracerebral hemorrhage. Carbon monoxide, a potentially neuroprotective agent at low concentrations, was found to control microglial erythrophagocytosis by regulating cell surface expression of CD36 and also reduced the severity of hemorrhagic injury. Pro‐inflammatory cytokines such as TNF‐α downregulate microglial CD36 expression, leading to impairments in microglial engulfment of the hematoma following intracerebral hemorrhage.
Oxidatively modified lipoproteins are neurotoxic and a rapid clearance of oxidized lipoproteins is therefore vital for proper CNS function. Oxidized lipoproteins in the periphery are effectively removed from the circulation by SR‐expressing liver cells; however, the mechanism underlying the clearance of modified lipoproteins in the stroke brain remains elusive.
In addition to the aforementioned receptors, other receptors may also regulate microglial phagocytosis. For example, CD22 (Siglec 2) is a negative regulator of phagocytosis and its expression is upregulated on aged microglia., CD22 also mediates the antiphagocytic effect of α2,6‐linked sialic acid, and inhibition of CD22 promotes clearance of myelin debris, amyloid‐β oligomers, and α‐synuclein fibrils in vivo., Long‐term CNS delivery of an antibody that blocks CD22 function reprograms microglia toward a homeostatic transcriptional state and improves cognitive function in aged mice.
Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2)
TREM2 is primarily expressed on myeloid cells and belongs to the lectin‐like immunoglobulin superfamily. TREM2 plays a critical role in myelin processing by binding lipids that are components of the myelin sheath (e.g., sulfatides and PS) and signaling through its co‐receptor DAP12 to activate a transcriptional profile., TREM2 knockout suppresses microglia/macrophage numbers in ischemic brain injury and impairs phagocytic capacity by decreasing expression of CD68 and interactions with apoptotic cells., TREM2 also regulates microglial cell activation in response to demyelination.,, TREM2 deficiency causes impaired clearance of myelin debris and axonal dysfunction in both young and aging mice. TREM2 deficiency also exacerbates ischemic damage and worsens neurological recovery in ischemic stroke models. In intracerebral hemorrhage, TREM2 activation attenuates neuroinflammation and neuronal apoptosis by activating PI3K/Akt. Taken together, microglial TREM2 may play a neuroprotective role in stroke and is a promising therapeutic target for the treatment of acute brain injuries.,
Purinergic receptors
Following brain damage, injured neurons release uridine diphosphate (UDP), which binds to and activates microglia/macrophage P2Y6 receptors and induces formation of the phagocytic cup., This signaling pathway is important for debris clearance and functional recovery after ischemic stroke. Inhibition of the P2Y6/UDP complex decreases microglial phagocytosis and protects the brain against ischemic stroke and other CNS diseases,,,, perhaps by mitigating production of inflammatory cytokines such as IL‐1β, TNF‐α, and IL‐6. P2Y6R‐mediated phagocytosis may be a therapeutic target for ischemic stroke at the acute injury stage. However, further studies are warranted to investigate the role of P2Y6R in both the acute and chronic stages of stroke.
Phosphatidylserine receptor
Asymmetric distribution of phospholipids across the plasma membrane is a unique characteristic of eukaryotic cells. As discussed above, phosphatidylserine is on the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane under physiological conditions, but it is flipped to the cell surface before phagocytosis under apoptotic conditions. The recognition of phosphatidylserine on apoptotic cells and the subsequent phagocytosis of apoptotic cells by microglia are mediated by a phosphatidylserine receptor (PSR). Microglial PSRs include TIM1, TIM4, BAI1, and TAM receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), Axl and Mer (encoded by Mertk gene). PSR activation enhances microglial phagocytosis and modulates microglial activation toward an antiinflammatory phenotype. MerTK or MFG‐E8, both of which mediate PS‐recognition, are upregulated by microglia after brain ischemia and enhance delayed neuronal death. Blocking this pathway promotes brain recovery by mitigating delayed neuronal loss and is associated with improved cognitive function., The TAM system is required for microglial recognition, response, and phagocytosis of Aβ plaques; TAM‐mediated microglial phagocytosis promotes the formation of dense‐core plaques.
Phagocytosis of hippocampal axons is a major contributor to dementia progression and appears to be associated with an increased expression of the PS receptor BAI1 on microglia and PS exposure on hippocampal axons. Post‐stroke neuroplastic remodeling rewires neuronal connections, which is critical for recovery. Phagocytic engulfment of PS‐exposing cells can suppress pro‐inflammatory signaling but also cause neuronal death. Thus, aberrant microglial phagocytosis of neuronal components can occur under various pathological conditions, and successful modulation of these processes may promote the repair of injured brain tissues.
Transcription factors that modulate microglia/macrophage phagocytosis
After “eat‐me” signals are recognized by phagocytic receptors on microglia/macrophages, actin polymerization is triggered and forms a phagocytic cup prior to the final phagocytotic process. Once there is closure of the phagocytic cup, the formed phagosome undergoes a process of maturation with endosomes and lysosomes before degrading the engulfed target. Regulation of this process may be another therapeutic target in brain disorders (Figure 2).
Signal transducer and activator transcription 6 (STAT6)
Signal transducer and activator transcription 6 (STAT6) belongs to the Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription family of proteins, which is principally activated by two cytokines, interleukin‐4 (IL‐4) and interleukin‐13 (IL‐13). STAT6 has multiple functions in lymphocytes such as T cells, B cells, and myeloid cells. STAT6 is also a key enhancer of erythrocyte engulfment after intracerebral hemorrhage, and the IL‐4/STAT6 axis promotes long‐term recovery in models of ICH. IL‐1 receptor‐like 1 activation is likely the key downstream step in IL‐4/STAT6‐conferred hematoma clearance. Accordingly, intranasal IL‐4 treatment or other STAT6 activators may be clinically feasible therapeutics for ICH. In ischemic stroke models, the STAT6/arginase1 (STAT6/Arg1) pathway is engaged in phagocytic clearance of dead/dying cells by both microglia and infiltrating macrophages, and upregulation of STAT6/Arg1 signaling ameliorates brain infarction and enhances long‐term neurofunctional recovery. The expression of STAT6 and the activity of its related signaling are increased after both ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes and are mechanistically linked to microglial/macrophage phagocytosis and superior neurofunctional outcomes. Treatment options targeting phagocytic STAT6 may therefore alleviate neurofunctional deficits associated with brain injuries. In particular, IL‐4‐enhanced microglia/macrophage phagocytosis may have good translational potential, given that IL‐4 has shown excellent safety profiles in multiple phase II clinical trials.
Peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor‐γ (PPARγ)
Peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor‐γ (PPARγ) has multiple functional roles in health and disease, such as regulating fatty acid synthesis, glucose metabolism, and adipocyte differentiation. PPARγ induces monocyte differentiation into distinct macrophages with more efficient phagocytic capacities and promotes the antiinflammatory response., In neurological disorders, PPARγ enhances microglia/macrophage‐afforded elimination of Aβ and decreases oxidative stress in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. PPARγ activation increases phagocytic CD36 expression and promotes the clearance of blood deposits by microglia/macrophages, thereby improving neurofunctional recovery in animal models of ICH., In animal models of ischemic stroke, PPARγ activation with rosiglitazone treatment increases phagocytic CD36 expression in microglia and enhances the clearance of invading neutrophils.
Nuclear factor‐erythroid 2 p45‐related factor 2
The transcription factor nuclear factor erythroid 2‐related factor (Nrf2) is a regulator of cytoprotective antioxidant and antiinflammatory signaling pathways. The Nrf2 agonist sulforaphane upregulates the scavenger receptor CD36 and promotes phagocytosis of red blood cells (RBCs) by microglia after ICH. As microglia are the primary phagocytic effector cells responsible for hematoma resolution after ICH, effective clearance of RBCs and RBC‐derived toxins represents a promising therapeutic option. Treatment with 2‐cyano‐3, 12‐dioxooleana‐1, 9‐dien‐28‐oic acid (CDDO)‐ethylamide (CDDO‐EA), a novel Nrf2 activator, can confer neuroprotection against ischemic injury by augmenting HO‐1 expression and microglial polarization toward the M2 phenotype in a murine stroke model.
Hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1α
Hypoxia‐inducible factor (HIF) is a heterodimer composed of oxygen‐sensitive α (HIF‐α) and oxygen‐insensitive β subunits. Under hypoxic conditions, instead of being hydroxylated, HIF‐α interacts with HIF‐1β in the cytoplasm and then translocates into the nucleus, where it binds to hypoxia‐responsive elements (HREs) of HIF‐targeting genes. HIF‐1α facilitates microglial phagocytosis by upregulating expression of CD36 and/or MFG‐E8, both of which contain HREs and promote stroke recovery during the acute stage. HIF‐1α also engages in the metabolic regulation of microglia. HIF increases glycolytic enzymes involved in energy metabolism and balances energy supply and demand. The mTOR‐HIF‐1α axis is also implicated in microglial metabolic reprogramming in AD, resulting in diminishment of microglial phagocytosis of Aβ. Further investigation of HIF‐1α is warranted to assess the beneficial aspects of microglial metabolic regulation by HIF‐1α in brain disorders.
Microglial phenotype after phagocytosis
Microglia play multifaceted roles in the pathogenesis of secondary brain injury at both acute and chronic stages. Together with recruited macrophages, microglia are the primary triggers of neuroinflammation in the CNS, which can be activated within minutes after stroke. Microglial proliferation reaches a peak at 48–72 h after stroke and can last for several weeks. Microglia are mainly detected in the area of ischemic core and then extend to the peri‐infarct region over time. Microglia assume distinct (sometimes polarized) phenotypes as an important warmup process before they join the battle, including transitioning between pro‐inflammatory and antiinflammatory profiles. Signaling pathways such as IFN‐γ and STAT1 promote a phenotype designated as “M1,” which is associated with secretion of pro‐inflammatory cytokines such as TNF‐α, IL‐1β, and IL‐12, to present antigens and kill pathogens. Conversely, IL‐4, IL‐10, or IL‐13 can mediate “M2” polarization and the secretion of neuroprotective factors, such as GDNF, BDNF, IL‐10, and TGF‐β, to facilitate tissue regeneration after injury. Both M1 and M2 microglia/macrophages express phagocytic receptors, but the M2 phenotype is associated with better phagocytic abilities and dead neuron clearance than the M1 phenotype. Phagocytosis mediated by the M1 phenotype may encourage inappropriate phagocytosis of viable neurons, while phagocytosis mediated by the M2 phenotype may be neuroprotective via antioxidative functions.
Does phagocytosis promote or hinder CNS function?
In the acute and subacute stages following brain injury, microglia/macrophages may exacerbate tissue damage by releasing pro‐inflammatory cytokines, and yet, these versatile cells also assist in tissue repair and vascular remodeling. Bulk RNA sequencing data suggest that macrophages in the mouse brain are subject to reprogramming after experimental stroke and transform into a phenotype with enhanced efferocytotic activity., Resident microglia are responsible for more phagocytic activity after stroke compared with hematogenous macrophages, but both cell types can contribute to debris clearance.
One important phagocytic function for microglia is the engulfment of apoptotic cells and debris from broken myelin, which prevents the release of cytotoxic intracellular contents. Similarly, microglia eliminate neurotoxic blood products by phagocytosing and processing extravasated erythrocytes in ICH, preventing their lysis and the ensuing neurotoxicity. The infiltration of other myeloid cells such as neutrophils contributes to pro‐inflammatory neuronal damage at the acute phase of stroke. Microglia also have the power to remove infiltrating neutrophils via phagocytosis, thereby mitigating neutrophil‐mediated neurovascular destruction after brain injury., Notably, neutrophils can escape from microglial engulfment via plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI1)‐dependent downregulation of vitronectin receptor (VNR) after brain injury. On the contrary, microglia also directly engulf endothelial cells and may facilitate disintegration of blood vessels and breakdown of the blood brain barrier (BBB), which would accelerate further infiltration of circulating immune cells into brain parenchyma. After ischemia, neurons expose PS on their outer plasma membrane via the calcium‐activated phosphatidylserine scramblase TMEM16F. This process may allow microglia to phagocytose stressed (but still viable) neurons in the penumbra and exacerbate functional deficits after ischemia and reperfusion. On the contrary, the impact of microglial phagocytotic actions toward live cells upon long‐term stroke outcomes remains unknown, and the clearance of stressed‐but‐viable cells may or may not facilitate long‐term rewiring.
In the chronic stages of brain injury, microglia/macrophages have a multipronged impact on neurogenesis, angiogenesis, and neuroplasticity in brain tissues., Microglia may modulate neuronal and synaptic functions after stroke by stimulating the proliferation of neural progenitor cells (NPCs). Indeed, neurogenesis is accelerated after brain damage. Microglia in the ipsilateral subventricular zone (SVZ) promote neurogenesis through upregulation of TGF‐α, while those in the peri‐infarct areas exert the opposite effects. In the ischemic penumbra, perivascular microglia promote blood vessel disintegration via upregulation of CD68 expression but in the contralateral nonischemic hemisphere, microglia release enhance angiogenesis via VEGF. Some of the synapses within the ischemic areas display enhanced turnover rates after contacting microglia, suggesting that microglia are involved in synaptic pruning after stroke.
Excessive phagocytosis of myelin sheaths can accelerate demyelination with detrimental consequences. Microglia selectively phagocytose myelin sheaths to sculpt myelination in homeostatic conditions, but they can also cause myelin damage by excessively engulfing myelin sheaths 14 days after stroke. On the contrary, when microglia/macrophages internalize cholesterol‐rich myelin debris, they can then synthesize sterols to reinforce remyelination by oligodendrocytes in multiple sclerosis (MS). Whether or not similar mechanisms exist in post‐stroke remodeling remains to be investigated.
In summary, microglia/macrophages play dynamic roles in brain injuries. They engulf dead/dying neurons and neuronal debris to reduce inflammation but may also phagocytose injured yet salvageable neurons in the ischemic penumbra. Although both brain resident microglia and infiltrating macrophages are involved in phagocytic activities following acute brain injury, most studies do not distinguish these two cell populations. However, microglia and macrophages may exhibit distinctive characteristics after brain damage. A thorough understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the regulation of microglia/macrophage phagocytosis after brain injury and the causal link between the temporospatial characteristics of phagocytosis and disease progression/recovery is warranted. The latter information may be leveraged in novel therapeutic strategies to promote the beneficial effects of phagocytosis while avoiding its detrimental effects.
MICROGLIA/MACROPHAGES TOIL IN SUPPORT OF BRAIN REPAIR
The brain is a lipid‐rich organ. A large proportion of lipid is found within the myelin sheath. Lipid uptake or phagocytosis by microglia/macrophages clears the lipidic myelin debris after brain injury. Subsequent lipid metabolism by microglia/macrophage supports axon regeneration, neurogenesis, and rewiring of the neuronal network. Microglia directly interact with synapses during development and under disease conditions. Furthermore, they help to clear disorganized synapse structures, enhance synaptic pruning, and create a favorable extracellular matrix environment for restoration of the anatomical structure and physiological function of the brain after injury.
Fat processing after myelin phagocytosis
Persistent demyelination following brain injury impairs neurofunctional recovery. A successful remyelination process following brain injury involves the clearance of myelin debris, the recycling of lipids by microglia and macrophages, and the regeneration of oligodendrocytes, all of which rebuilds the myelin sheath and rewires functional neuronal circuits., A recent single‐cell RNA sequencing study suggests that microglia/macrophages upregulate genes coding for ApoE and Lpl, as well as other phagocytic signature genes associated with lipid clearance and metabolism and extracellular matrix reshaping. Because the CNS cannot use lipids from non‐brain sources, microglia/macrophage‐afforded recycling of lipid debris from broken myelin is of great importance in neuroplastic recovery after brain injury. A timely activation of the pro‐inflammatory program in microglia/macrophages appears to be required for myelin clearance, oligodendrogenesis, and remyelination. Microglia/macrophages that actively participate in myelin repair (myelin clearance and remyelination) exhibit increased lipid droplet accumulation and pro‐inflammatory characteristics, including increased TREM2 expression., Microglia/macrophages appear to facilitate myelin repair through sequential actions involving the engulfment of myelin debris and synthesis and production of desmosterol, the precursor of cholesterol. Thus, pharmacological manipulations that enhance myelin repair by regulating lipid metabolism in microglia/macrophages may have clinical potential against brain injury.
Synaptic pruning and remodeling
Synaptic pruning and remodeling are pivotal in neuroplastic recovery after injury. During neural development, microglia help shape the neural network by phagocytosing excess synapses, dendrites, and axons, and refining the neural circuitry. Microglia also regulate myelination during developmental myelin sheath formation, contributing to neural circuit refinement and adaptation. Synaptic pruning and remodeling are activated during the recovery phase following brain injuries. The successful rewiring of surviving neural networks and the recruitment of functional synapses after injury are positively correlated with neurofunctional recovery. Several mechanisms are believed to underlie regulation of synaptic pruning and remodeling by microglia/macrophages, such as the complement opsonin C3 and CR3. Finally, microglia support synaptogenesis and pruning after brain injury by regulating the extracellular matrix. Upon activation by the cytokine IL‐33 following brain injury, microglia upregulate expression of extracellular matrix proteases that promote turnover of pathological extracellular matrix proteins to create a more favorable microenvironment for synapse plasticity and neuronal network rewiring.
SUMMARY
In this review, we have summarized the molecular mechanisms that are engaged during microglia/macrophage phagocytosis after brain injury and their potential roles in functional outcomes. We have also described phagocytic pathways that play both detrimental and beneficial roles in brain injury and recovery. However, there are important knowledge gaps in our understanding of the role of microglia/macrophage phagocytosis in acute brain injury. First, most studies on microglia/macrophage phagocytosis do not distinguish between microglia and macrophages. CNS resident microglia and infiltrating bone marrow‐derived macrophages may display distinctive phagocytotic profiles under different brain injury conditions. For example, infiltrating bone marrow‐derived macrophages appear to dominate over microglia in the phagocytosis of red blood cells and hematoma resolution after ICH., A similar trend has been reported in animal models of ischemic stroke, where resident microglia might themselves be susceptible to an ischemic insult, thus impairing their phagocytic capabilities, while peripheral macrophages could be fully activated by damage signals from the brain. A better understanding of the diverse roles of CNS resident microglia and peripherally originating macrophages in phagocytosis may have important implications in fine‐tuning novel therapeutic strategies against brain injuries.
Second, border‐associated macrophages (BAMs) residing in the dura mater, subdural meninges, and choroid plexus represent another myeloid cell population with unique transcriptomes, cellular compositions, and phagocytic abilities compared with microglia and bone marrow‐derived macrophages., Following stroke, both BAMs and bone marrow‐derived macrophages are recruited to the brain lesion site. Post‐stroke BAMs are more similar to microglia than bone‐derived macrophages in multiple aspects, including gene expression. However, in AD, a downregulation of phagocytosis‐related genes is observed in BAMs compared with microglia. Furthermore, a non‐negligible proportion of BAMs can be replaced by infiltrating monocyte/macrophages during brain injury, after BAMs have infiltrated the ischemic brain parenchyma.
Third, most studies on ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or on traumatic brain injury have used rodent models. However, there exist substantial differences in rodent versus human microglial biology. A recent single‐cell RNA sequencing study shows that non‐diseased human brain microglia express elevated levels of CCL2, CCL4, EGR2, and EGR3, suggesting that human microglia may have a chronic pro‐inflammatory baseline compared with rodent microglia. TGF‐β1 is an important cytokine expressed in mouse microglia but less is known about its function in human microglia. Furthermore, mouse microglia are robustly activated via TLR4 upon lipopolysaccharide stimulation, whereas human brain microglia are less responsive to TLR4 ligand binding.
Fourth, aging and sex differences add on extra layers of complexity to microglia/macrophage phagocytosis in brain injuries, although these topics are under active investigation., In aged individuals, the expression of phagocytosis receptors is altered, and phagocytic clearance of cell debris by microglia is impaired due to an overload of misfolded proteins, inadequate responses to stimuli such as systemic inflammation, and microglial overactivation in secondary brain injury.,, Sex differences are also a major but understudied factor impacting brain function and disease profiles. Male and female rodents are known to display distinct microglia distributions, motility, and functional activities at baseline and under disease conditions. Thus, further investigations of the impact of aging and sex differences on microglia/macrophage phagocytosis are warranted.
Fifth, the majority of stroke patients have at least one comorbidity, most of which are also independent risk factors for stroke., Aging is a robust disease modifier that worsens stroke recovery. Aside from age‐related pathologies, almost all types of comorbidities, including hypertension and diabetes, are associated with chronic inflammation, microvascular dysfunction, metabolic disorders, and microglia/macrophage deregulation.,,, Mounting evidence demonstrates that aging and stroke comorbidities exert a significant impact on the phagocytic actions of microglia and macrophages. For example, diabetic conditions and resulting cerebral microbleeds encourage the infiltration and aggregation of phagocytic, galectin 3‐expressing macrophages from blood, to assist in the clearance of dysfunctional micro‐vessels. Type 2 diabetes is also a potent trigger of enhanced microglia/macrophage proliferation and shifts microglia/macrophages toward pro‐inflammatory phenotypes associated with unfavorable long‐term neurofunctional outcomes., In addition, macrophages are key arbitrators in the pathophysiology of hypertension. Macrophages display abnormal activation and phenotype switching in hypertension; thus, further study is warranted on the phagocytic activities of macrophages in brain injury under conditions of preexisting hypertension.,,
In conclusion, a better mechanistic understanding of phagocytosis may help us selectively target and manipulate microglia/macrophage function and hasten the safe and effective treatment of brain disorders in the clinic.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None.
References 182
- 1.
Deshpande OA, Wadhwa R. Phagocytosis. StatPearls; 2021.
Not in our library
- 2.
Bosel J. Blood pressure control for acute severe ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017;23:81‐86
Not in our library10.1097/mcc.0000000000000394
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
Strecker JK, Schmidt A, Schabitz WR, Minnerup J. Neutrophil granulocytes in cerebral ischemia ‐ evolution from killers to key players. Neurochem Int. 2017;107:117‐126
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuint.2016.11.006
- 6.
Cai W, Dai X, Chen J, et al. STAT6/Arg1 promotes microglia/macrophage efferocytosis and inflammation resolution in stroke mice. JCI Insight. 2019;4
Not in our library10.1172/jci.insight.131355
- 7.
Brown GC, Vilalta A. How microglia kill neurons. Brain Res. 2015;1628:288‐297
Not in our library10.1016/j.brainres.2015.08.031
- 8.
- 9.
Zera KA, Buckwalter MS. The local and peripheral immune responses to stroke: implications for therapeutic development. Neurotherapeutics. 2020;17:414‐435
Not in our library10.1007/s13311-020-00844-3
- 10.
Neumann J, Sauerzweig S, Ronicke R, et al. Microglia cells protect neurons by direct engulfment of invading neutrophil granulocytes: a new mechanism of CNS immune privilege. J Neurosci. 2008;28:5965‐5975
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.0060-08.2008
- 11.
Ronaldson PT, Davis TP. Regulation of blood‐brain barrier integrity by microglia in health and disease: a therapeutic opportunity. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2020;40:S6‐S24
Not in our library10.1177/0271678x20951995
- 12.
Shields DC, Haque A, Banik NL. Neuroinflammatory responses of microglia in central nervous system trauma. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2020;40:S25‐S33
Not in our library10.1177/0271678x20965786
- 13.
Kluge MG, Abdolhoseini M, Zalewska K, et al. Spatiotemporal analysis of impaired microglia process movement at sites of secondary neurodegeneration post‐stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019;39:2456‐2470
Not in our library10.1177/0271678x18797346
- 14.
- 15.
Brown GC, Neher JJ. Microglial phagocytosis of live neurons. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;15:209‐216
Not in our library10.1038/nrn3710
- 16.
Neher JJ, Emmrich JV, Fricker M, Mander PK, Théry C, Brown GC. Phagocytosis executes delayed neuronal death after focal brain ischemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:E4098‐4107
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1308679110
- 17.
Vilalta A, Brown GC. Neurophagy, the phagocytosis of live neurons and synapses by glia, contributes to brain development and disease. FEBS J. 2018;285:3566‐3575
Not in our library10.1111/febs.14323
- 18.
Kerr N, Dietrich DW, Bramlett HM, Raval AP. Sexually dimorphic microglia and ischemic stroke. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2019;25:1308‐1317
Not in our library10.1111/cns.13267
- 19.
Hu MY, Lin YY, Zhang BJ, Lu DL, Lu ZQ, Cai W. Update of inflammasome activation in microglia/macrophage in aging and aging‐related disease. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2019;25:1299‐1307
Not in our library10.1111/cns.13262
- 20.
Xie D, He M, Hu X. Microglia/macrophage diversities in central nervous system physiology and pathology. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2019;25:1287‐1289
Not in our library10.1111/cns.13257
- 21.
Butler CA, Popescu AS, Kitchener EJA, Allendorf DH, Puigdellivol M, Brown GC. Microglial phagocytosis of neurons in neurodegeneration, and its regulation. J Neurochem. 2021;158:621‐639
Not in our library10.1111/jnc.15327
- 22.
- 23.
Fuhrmann M, Bittner T, Jung CK, et al. Microglial Cx3cr1 knockout prevents neuron loss in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:411‐413
Not in our library10.1038/nn.2511
- 24.
- 25.
Bolos M, Perea JR, Terreros‐Roncal J, et al. Absence of microglial CX3CR1 impairs the synaptic integration of adult‐born hippocampal granule neurons. Brain Behav Immun. 2018;68:76‐89
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbi.2017.10.002
- 26.
Kim HY, Huang BX, Spector AA. Phosphatidylserine in the brain: metabolism and function. Prog Lipid Res. 2014;56:1‐18
Not in our library10.1016/j.plipres.2014.06.002
- 27.
Martin SJ, Reutelingsperger CP, McGahon AJ, et al. Early redistribution of plasma membrane phosphatidylserine is a general feature of apoptosis regardless of the initiating stimulus: inhibition by overexpression of Bcl‐2 and Abl. J Exp Med. 1995;182:1545‐1556
Not in our library10.1084/jem.182.5.1545
- 28.
- 29.
Suzuki J, Fujii T, Imao T, Ishihara K, Kuba H, Nagata S. Calcium‐dependent phospholipid scramblase activity of TMEM16 protein family members. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:13305‐13316
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m113.457937
- 30.
Neher JJ, Neniskyte U, Zhao JW, Bal‐Price A, Tolkovsky AM, Brown GC. Inhibition of microglial phagocytosis is sufficient to prevent inflammatory neuronal death. J Immunol. 2011;186:4973‐4983
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1003600
- 31.
Hu X, Liou AK, Leak RK, et al. Neurobiology of microglial action in CNS injuries: receptor‐mediated signaling mechanisms and functional roles. Prog Neurobiol. 2014;119–120:60‐84
Not in our library10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.06.002
- 32.
Fadok VA, Bratton DL, Rose DM, Pearson A, Ezekewitz RA, Henson PM. A receptor for phosphatidylserine‐specific clearance of apoptotic cells. Nature. 2000;405:85‐90
Not in our library10.1038/35011084
- 33.
Kobayashi N, Karisola P, Pena‐Cruz V, et al. TIM‐1 and TIM‐4 glycoproteins bind phosphatidylserine and mediate uptake of apoptotic cells. Immunity. 2007;27:927‐940
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2007.11.011
- 34.
Miyanishi M, Tada K, Koike M, Uchiyama Y, Kitamura T, Nagata S. Identification of Tim4 as a phosphatidylserine receptor. Nature. 2007;450:435‐439.
Not in our library10.1038/nature06307
- 35.
Park SY, Jung MY, Kim HJ, et al. Rapid cell corpse clearance by stabilin‐2, a membrane phosphatidylserine receptor. Cell Death Differ. 2008;15:192‐201
Not in our library10.1038/sj.cdd.4402242
- 36.
Park D, Tosello‐Trampont AC, Elliott MR, et al. BAI1 is an engulfment receptor for apoptotic cells upstream of the ELMO/Dock180/Rac module. Nature. 2007;450:430‐434
Not in our library10.1038/nature06329
- 37.
Hanayama R, Tanaka M, Miwa K, Shinohara A, Iwamatsu A, Nagata S. Identification of a factor that links apoptotic cells to phagocytes. Nature. 2002;417:182‐187
Not in our library10.1038/417182a417182a[pii]
- 38.
Leonardi‐Essmann F, Emig M, Kitamura Y, Spanagel R, Gebicke‐Haerter PJ. Fractalkine‐upregulated milk‐fat globule EGF factor‐8 protein in cultured rat microglia. J Neuroimmunol. 2005;160:92‐101
Not in our library10.1016/j.jneuroim.2004.11.012
- 39.
Borisenko GG, Matsura T, Liu SX, et al. Macrophage recognition of externalized phosphatidylserine and phagocytosis of apoptotic Jurkat cells—existence of a threshold. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2003;413:41‐52
Not in our library10.1016/s0003-9861(03)00083-3
- 40.
Suzuki J, Umeda M, Sims PJ, Nagata S. Calcium‐dependent phospholipid scrambling by TMEM16F. Nature. 2010;468:834‐838
Not in our library10.1038/nature09583
- 41.
Gardai SJ, McPhillips KA, Frasch SC, et al. Cell‐surface calreticulin initiates clearance of viable or apoptotic cells through trans‐activation of LRP on the phagocyte. Cell. 2005;123:321‐334
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.032
- 42.
Tyurin VA, Tyurina YY, Feng W, et al. Mass‐spectrometric characterization of phospholipids and their primary peroxidation products in rat cortical neurons during staurosporine‐induced apoptosis. J Neurochem. 2008;107:1614‐1633
Not in our library10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05728.x
- 43.
Cockram TOJ, Dundee JM, Popescu AS, Brown GC. The phagocytic code regulating phagocytosis of mammalian cells. Front Immunol. 2021;12:629979
Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2021.629979
- 44.
- 45.
- 46.
Aderem A, Underhill DM. Mechanisms of phagocytosis in macrophages. Annu Rev Immunol. 1999;17:593‐623
Not in our library10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.593
- 47.
Linnartz B, Kopatz J, Tenner AJ, Neumann H. Sialic acid on the neuronal glycocalyx prevents complement C1 binding and complement receptor‐3‐mediated removal by microglia. J Neurosci. 2012;32:946‐952
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.3830-11.2012
- 48.
Schafer DP, Stevens B. Phagocytic glial cells: sculpting synaptic circuits in the developing nervous system. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013;23:1034‐1040
Not in our library10.1016/j.conb.2013.09.012
- 49.
Schafer DP, Lehrman EK, Kautzman AG, et al. Microglia sculpt postnatal neural circuits in an activity and complement‐dependent manner. Neuron. 2012;74:691‐705
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.026
- 50.
Lee JD, Coulthard LG, Woodruff TM. Complement dysregulation in the central nervous system during development and disease. Semin Immunol. 2019;45:101340
Not in our library10.1016/j.smim.2019.101340
- 51.
Lalancette‐Hebert M, Swarup V, Beaulieu JM, et al. Galectin‐3 is required for resident microglia activation and proliferation in response to ischemic injury. J Neurosci. 2012;32:10383‐10395
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.1498-12.2012
- 52.
- 53.
Atagi Y, Liu CC, Painter MM, et al. Apolipoprotein E is a ligand for triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2). J Biol Chem. 2015;290:26043‐26050
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m115.679043
- 54.
Cudaback E, Li X, Montine KS, Montine TJ, Keene CD. Apolipoprotein E isoform‐dependent microglia migration. FASEB J. 2011;25:2082‐2091
Not in our library10.1096/fj.10-176891
- 55.
Chung WS, Verghese PB, Chakraborty C, et al. Novel allele‐dependent role for APOE in controlling the rate of synapse pruning by astrocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:10186‐10191
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1609896113
- 56.
Lehrman EK, Wilton DK, Litvina EY, et al. CD47 protects synapses from excess microglia‐mediated pruning during development. Neuron. 2018;100(120–134):e126
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.017
- 57.
- 58.
- 59.
Ni W, Mao S, Xi G, Keep RF, Hua Y. Role of erythrocyte CD47 in intracerebral hematoma clearance. Stroke. 2016;47:505‐511
Not in our library10.1161/strokeaha.115.010920
- 60.
Jing C, Bian L, Wang M, Keep RF, Xi G, Hua Y. Enhancement of hematoma clearance with CD47 blocking antibody in experimental intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2019;50:1539‐1547
Not in our library10.1161/strokeaha.118.024578
- 61.
Jiang L, Mu H, Xu F, et al. Transcriptomic and functional studies reveal undermined chemotactic and angiostimulatory properties of aged microglia during stroke recovery. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2020;40:S81‐S97
Not in our library10.1177/0271678x20902542
- 62.
Song Y, Wang H, Li F, Huang Q, Zhang Z. Anti‐CD47 antibody administration via cisterna magna in proper dosage can reduce perihematomal cell death following intracerebral hemorrhage in rats. Brain Res Bull. 2021;174:359‐365
Not in our library10.1016/j.brainresbull.2021.07.003
- 63.
- 64.
Gheibihayat SM, Cabezas R, Nikiforov NG, Jamialahmadi T, Johnston TP, Sahebkar A. CD47 in the brain and neurodegeneration: An update on the role in neuroinflammatory pathways. Molecules. 2021;26
Not in our library10.3390/molecules26133943
- 65.
Jin G, Tsuji K, Xing C, Yang YG, Wang X, Lo EH. CD47 gene knockout protects against transient focal cerebral ischemia in mice. Exp Neurol. 2009;217:165‐170
Not in our library10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.02.004
- 66.
Zhao S, Yu Z, Liu Y, et al. CD47 deficiency improves neurological outcomes of traumatic brain injury in mice. Neurosci Lett. 2017;643:125‐130
Not in our library10.1016/j.neulet.2016.12.006
- 67.
- 68.
Cardona AE, Pioro EP, Sasse ME, et al. Control of microglial neurotoxicity by the fractalkine receptor. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:917‐924
Not in our library10.1038/nn1715
- 69.
Zhang H, Li F, Yang Y, Chen J, Hu X. SIRP/CD47 signaling in neurological disorders. Brain Res. 2015;1623:74‐80
Not in our library10.1016/j.brainres.2015.03.012
- 70.
Liu Y, Yang X, Guo C, Nie P, Liu Y, Ma J. Essential role of MFG‐E8 for phagocytic properties of microglial cells. PloS One. 2013;8:e55754
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0055754
- 71.
Cunningham CL, Martinez‐Cerdeno V, Noctor SC. Microglia regulate the number of neural precursor cells in the developing cerebral cortex. J Neurosci. 2013;33:4216‐4233
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.3441-12.2013
- 72.
Wakselman S, Bechade C, Roumier A, Bernard D, Triller A, Bessis A. Developmental neuronal death in hippocampus requires the microglial CD11b integrin and DAP12 immunoreceptor. J Neurosci. 2008;28:8138‐8143
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.1006-08.2008
- 73.
Fitzgerald KA, Kagan JC. Toll‐like receptors and the control of immunity. Cell. 2020;180:1044‐1066
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.041
- 74.
Caso JR, Pradillo JM, Hurtado O, Leza JC, Moro MA, Lizasoain I. Toll‐like receptor 4 is involved in subacute stress‐induced neuroinflammation and in the worsening of experimental stroke. Stroke. 2008;39:1314‐1320
Not in our library10.1161/strokeaha.107.498212
- 75.
- 76.
Tahara K, Kim HD, Jin JJ, Maxwell JA, Li L, Fukuchi K. Role of toll‐like receptor signalling in Abeta uptake and clearance. Brain. 2006;129:3006‐3019
Not in our library10.1093/brain/awl249
- 77.
Gao YY, Tao T, Wu D, et al. MFG‐E8 attenuates inflammation in subarachnoid hemorrhage by driving microglial M2 polarization. Exp Neurol. 2021;336:113532
Not in our library10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113532
- 78.
Rajbhandari L, Tegenge MA, Shrestha S, et al. Toll‐like receptor 4 deficiency impairs microglial phagocytosis of degenerating axons. Glia. 2014;62:1982‐1991
Not in our library10.1002/glia.22719
- 79.
Canton J, Neculai D, Grinstein S. Scavenger receptors in homeostasis and immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:621‐634
Not in our library10.1038/nri3515
- 80.
Granucci F, Petralia F, Urbano M, et al. The scavenger receptor MARCO mediates cytoskeleton rearrangements in dendritic cells and microglia. Blood. 2003;102:2940‐2947
Not in our library10.1182/blood-2002-12-3651
- 81.
Milne SA, McGregor AL, McCulloch J, Sharkey J. Increased expression of macrophage receptor with collagenous structure (MARCO) in mouse cortex following middle cerebral artery occlusion. Neurosci Lett. 2005;383:58‐62
Not in our library10.1016/j.neulet.2005.03.065
- 82.
El Khoury JB, Moore KJ, Means TK, et al. CD36 mediates the innate host response to beta‐amyloid. J Exp Med. 2003;197:1657‐1666
Not in our library10.1084/jem.20021546
- 83.
Kaiser S, Selzner L, Weber J, Schallner N. Carbon monoxide controls microglial erythrophagocytosis by regulating CD36 surface expression to reduce the severity of hemorrhagic injury. Glia. 2020;68:2427‐2445
Not in our library10.1002/glia.23864
- 84.
Fang H, Chen J, Lin S, et al. CD36‐mediated hematoma absorption following intracerebral hemorrhage: negative regulation by TLR4 signaling. J Immunol. 2014;192:5984‐5992
Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.1400054
- 85.
Keller JN, Hanni KB, Kindy MS. Oxidized high‐density lipoprotein induces neuron death. Exp Neurol. 2000;161:621‐630
Not in our library10.1006/exnr.1999.7276
- 86.
Pluvinage JV, Haney MS, Smith BAH, et al. CD22 blockade restores homeostatic microglial phagocytosis in ageing brains. Nature. 2019;568:187‐192
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-019-1088-4
- 87.
Aires V, Coulon‐Bainier C, Pavlovic A, et al. CD22 blockage restores age‐related impairments of microglia surveillance capacity. Front Immunol. 2021;12:684430
Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2021.684430
- 88.
Siddiqui SS, Matar R, Merheb M, et al. Siglecs in brain function and neurological disorders. Cell. 2019;8
Not in our library10.3390/cells8101125
- 89.
- 90.
Lewcock JW, Schlepckow K, Di Paolo G, Tahirovic S, Monroe KM, Haass C. Emerging microglia biology defines novel therapeutic approaches for Alzheimer's disease. Neuron. 2020;108:801‐821
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2020.09.029
- 91.
Keren‐Shaul H, Spinrad A, Weiner A, et al. A unique microglia type associated with restricting development of Alzheimer's disease. Cell. 2017;169(1276–1290):e1217
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.018
- 92.
- 93.
Cantoni C, Bollman B, Licastro D, et al. TREM2 regulates microglial cell activation in response to demyelination in vivo. Acta Neuropathol. 2015;129:429‐447
Not in our library10.1007/s00401-015-1388-1
- 94.
Poliani PL, Wang Y, Fontana E, et al. TREM2 sustains microglial expansion during aging and response to demyelination. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:2161‐2170
Not in our library10.1172/jci77983
- 95.
Kawabori M, Kacimi R, Kauppinen T, et al. Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) deficiency attenuates phagocytic activities of microglia and exacerbates ischemic damage in experimental stroke. J Neurosci. 2015;35:3384‐3396
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.2620-14.2015
- 96.
- 97.
Gervois P, Lambrichts I. The emerging role of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 as a target for immunomodulation in ischemic stroke. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1668
Not in our library10.3389/fimmu.2019.01668
- 98.
Belayev L, Hong SH, Freitas RS, et al. DHA modulates MANF and TREM2 abundance, enhances neurogenesis, reduces infarct size, and improves neurological function after experimental ischemic stroke. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2020;26:1155‐1167
Not in our library10.1111/cns.13444
- 99.
Koizumi S, Shigemoto‐Mogami Y, Nasu‐Tada K, et al. UDP acting at P2Y6 receptors is a mediator of microglial phagocytosis. Nature. 2007;446:1091‐1095
Not in our library10.1038/nature05704
- 100.
Wen RX, Shen H, Huang SX, et al. P2Y6 receptor inhibition aggravates ischemic brain injury by reducing microglial phagocytosis. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2020;26:416‐429
Not in our library10.1111/cns.13296
- 101.
Fricker M, Neher JJ, Zhao JW, Thery C, Tolkovsky AM, Brown GC. MFG‐E8 mediates primary phagocytosis of viable neurons during neuroinflammation. J Neurosci. 2012;32:2657‐2666
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.4837-11.2012
- 102.
- 103.
Fadeel B, Xue D. The ins and outs of phospholipid asymmetry in the plasma membrane: roles in health and disease. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2009;44:264‐277
Not in our library10.1080/10409230903193307
- 104.
De SR, Ajmone‐Cat MA, Nicolini A, Minghetti L. Expression of phosphatidylserine receptor and down‐regulation of pro‐inflammatory molecule production by its natural ligand in rat microglial cultures. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2002;61:237‐244
Not in our library10.1093/jnen/61.3.237
- 105.
Ravichandran KS. Beginnings of a good apoptotic meal: the find‐me and eat‐me signaling pathways. Immunity. 2011;35:445‐455
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2011.09.004
- 106.
Huang Y, Happonen KE, Burrola PG, et al. Microglia use TAM receptors to detect and engulf amyloid beta plaques. Nat Immunol. 2021;22:586‐594
Not in our library10.1038/s41590-021-00913-5
- 107.
Marker DF, Puccini JM, Mockus TE, Barbieri J, Lu SM, Gelbard HA. LRRK2 kinase inhibition prevents pathological microglial phagocytosis in response to HIV‐1 tat protein. J Neuroinflammation. 2012;9:261
Not in our library10.1186/1742-2094-9-261
- 108.
Yu F, Huang T, Ran Y, et al. New insights into the roles of microglial regulation in brain plasticity‐dependent stroke recovery. Front Cell Neurosci. 2021;15:727899
Not in our library10.3389/fncel.2021.727899
- 109.
- 110.
Quelle FW, Shimoda K, Thierfelder W, et al. Cloning of murine Stat6 and human Stat6, stat proteins that are tyrosine phosphorylated in responses to IL‐4 and IL‐3 but are not required for mitogenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15:3336‐3343
Not in our library10.1128/mcb.15.6.3336
- 111.
Goenka S, Kaplan MH. Transcriptional regulation by STAT6. Immunol Res. 2011;50:87‐96
Not in our library10.1007/s12026-011-8205-2
- 112.
Xu J, Chen Z, Yu F, et al. IL‐4/STAT6 signaling facilitates innate hematoma resolution and neurological recovery after hemorrhagic stroke in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:32679‐32690
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.2018497117
- 113.
Parulekar AD, Kao CC, Diamant Z, Hanania NA. Targeting the interleukin‐4 and interleukin‐13 pathways in severe asthma: current knowledge and future needs. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2018;24:50‐55
Not in our library10.1097/mcp.0000000000000436
- 114.
- 115.
Cai W, Yang T, Liu H, et al. Peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma): a master gatekeeper in CNS injury and repair. Prog Neurobiol. 2018;163‐164:27‐58
Not in our library10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.10.002
- 116.
Yamanaka M, Ishikawa T, Griep A, Axt D, Kummer MP, Heneka MT. PPARgamma/RXRalpha‐induced and CD36‐mediated microglial amyloid‐beta phagocytosis results in cognitive improvement in amyloid precursor protein/presenilin 1 mice. J Neurosci. 2012;32:17321‐17331
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.1569-12.2012
- 117.
Heppner FL, Ransohoff RM, Becher B. Immune attack: the role of inflammation in Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16:358‐372
Not in our library10.1038/nrn3880
- 118.
Ballesteros I, Cuartero MI, Pradillo JM, et al. Rosiglitazone‐induced CD36 up‐regulation resolves inflammation by PPARgamma and 5‐LO‐dependent pathways. J Leukoc Biol. 2014;95:587‐598
Not in our library10.1189/jlb.0613326
- 119.
Zhao X, Sun G, Ting SM, et al. Cleaning up after ICH: the role of Nrf2 in modulating microglia function and hematoma clearance. J Neurochem. 2015;133:144‐152
Not in our library10.1111/jnc.12974
- 120.
Lei X, Li H, Li M, et al. The novel Nrf2 activator CDDO‐EA attenuates cerebral ischemic injury by promoting microglia/macrophage polarization toward M2 phenotype in mice. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2021;27:82‐91
Not in our library10.1111/cns.13496
- 121.
Wenger RH. Cellular adaptation to hypoxia: O2‐sensing protein hydroxylases, hypoxia‐inducible transcription factors, and O2‐regulated gene expression. FASEB J. 2002;16:1151‐1162
Not in our library10.1096/fj.01-0944rev
- 122.
- 123.
York EM, Zhang J, Choi HB, MacVicar BA. Neuroinflammatory inhibition of synaptic long‐term potentiation requires immunometabolic reprogramming of microglia. Glia. 2021;69:567‐578
Not in our library10.1002/glia.23913
- 124.
- 125.
Baik SH, Kang S, Lee W, et al. A breakdown in metabolic reprogramming causes microglia dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. Cell Metab. 2019;30:493‐507.e496
Not in our library10.1016/j.cmet.2019.06.005
- 126.
Ma Y, Wang J, Wang Y, Yang GY. The biphasic function of microglia in ischemic stroke. Prog Neurobiol. 2017;157:247‐272
Not in our library10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.01.005
- 127.
Nakajima K, Kohsaka S. Microglia: neuroprotective and neurotrophic cells in the central nervous system. Curr Drug Targets Cardiovasc Haematol Disord. 2004;4:65‐84
Not in our library10.2174/1568006043481284
- 128.
Denes A, Vidyasagar R, Feng J, et al. Proliferating resident microglia after focal cerebral ischaemia in mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:1941‐1953
Not in our library10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600495
- 129.
Krupinski J, Kaluza J, Kumar P, Kumar S. Immunocytochemical studies of cellular reaction in human ischemic brain stroke. MAB anti‐CD68 stains macrophages, astrocytes and microglial cells in infarcted area. Folia Neuropathol. 1996;34:17‐24.
Not in our library
- 130.
Hu X, Li P, Guo Y, et al. Microglia/macrophage polarization dynamics reveal novel mechanism of injury expansion after focal cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2012;43:3063‐3070
Not in our library10.1161/strokeaha.112.659656
- 131.
Zhao SC, Ma LS, Chu ZH, Xu H, Wu WQ, Liu F. Regulation of microglial activation in stroke. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2017;38:445‐458
Not in our library10.1038/aps.2016.162
- 132.
Nathan CF, Murray HW, Wiebe ME, Rubin BY. Identification of interferon‐gamma as the lymphokine that activates human macrophage oxidative metabolism and antimicrobial activity. J Exp Med. 1983;158:670‐689
Not in our library10.1084/jem.158.3.670
- 133.
- 134.
Wang J, Yang W, Xie H, Song Y, Li Y, Wang L. Ischemic stroke and repair: current trends in research and tissue engineering treatments. Regen Med Res. 2014;2:3
Not in our library10.1186/2050-490x-2-3
- 135.
Neumann J, Gunzer M, Gutzeit HO, Ullrich O, Reymann KG, Dinkel K. Microglia provide neuroprotection after ischemia. FASEB J. 2006;20:714‐716
Not in our library10.1096/fj.05-4882fje
- 136.
Kigerl KA, Gensel JC, Ankeny DP, Alexander JK, Donnelly DJ, Popovich PG. Identification of two distinct macrophage subsets with divergent effects causing either neurotoxicity or regeneration in the injured mouse spinal cord. J Neurosci. 2009;29:13435‐13444
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.3257-09.2009
- 137.
McWhorter FY, Wang T, Nguyen P, Chung T, Liu WF. Modulation of macrophage phenotype by cell shape. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:17253‐17258
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1308887110
- 138.
Shi C, Pamer EG. Monocyte recruitment during infection and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:762‐774
Not in our library10.1038/nri3070
- 139.
Wang R, Liu Y, Ye Q, et al. RNA sequencing reveals novel macrophage transcriptome favoring neurovascular plasticity after ischemic stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2020;40:720‐738
Not in our library10.1177/0271678x19888630
- 140.
Schilling M, Besselmann M, Müller M, Strecker JK, Ringelstein EB, Kiefer R. Predominant phagocytic activity of resident microglia over hematogenous macrophages following transient focal cerebral ischemia: an investigation using green fluorescent protein transgenic bone marrow chimeric mice. Exp Neurol. 2005;196:290‐297
Not in our library10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.08.004
- 141.
Fukumoto Y, Tanaka KF, Parajuli B, et al. Neuroprotective effects of microglial P2Y(1) receptors against ischemic neuronal injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019;39:2144‐2156
Not in our library10.1177/0271678x18805317
- 142.
Zhao X, Grotta J, Gonzales N, Aronowski J. Hematoma resolution as a therapeutic target: the role of microglia/macrophages. Stroke. 2009;40:S92‐S94
Not in our library10.1161/strokeaha.108.533158
- 143.
Jickling GC, Liu D, Ander BP, Stamova B, Zhan X, Sharp FR. Targeting neutrophils in ischemic stroke: translational insights from experimental studies. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015;35:888‐901
Not in our library10.1038/jcbfm.2015.45
- 144.
Jones KA, Maltby S, Plank MW, et al. Peripheral immune cells infiltrate into sites of secondary neurodegeneration after ischemic stroke. Brain Behav Immun. 2018;67:299‐307
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbi.2017.09.006
- 145.
Jeon H, Kim JH, Kim JH, Lee WH, Lee MS, Suk K. Plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 regulates microglial motility and phagocytic activity. J Neuroinflammation. 2012;9:149
Not in our library10.1186/1742-2094-9-149
- 146.
Jolivel V, Bicker F, Binamé F, et al. Perivascular microglia promote blood vessel disintegration in the ischemic penumbra. Acta Neuropathol. 2015;129:279‐295
Not in our library10.1007/s00401-014-1372-1
- 147.
Qin C, Zhou LQ, Ma XT, et al. Dual functions of microglia in ischemic stroke. Neurosci Bull. 2019;35:921‐933
Not in our library10.1007/s12264-019-00388-3
- 148.
Pu H, Zheng X, Jiang X, et al. Interleukin‐4 improves white matter integrity and functional recovery after murine traumatic brain injury via oligodendroglial PPARgamma. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2021;41:511‐529
Not in our library10.1177/0271678x20941393
- 149.
Sandvig I, Augestad IL, Håberg AK, Sandvig A. Neuroplasticity in stroke recovery. The role of microglia in engaging and modifying synapses and networks. Eur J Neurosci. 2018;47:1414‐1428
Not in our library10.1111/ejn.13959
- 150.
Tsai YW, Yang YR, Wang PS, Wang RY. Intermittent hypoxia after transient focal ischemia induces hippocampal neurogenesis and c‐Fos expression and reverses spatial memory deficits in rats. PloS One. 2011;6:e24001
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0024001
- 151.
Choi JY, Kim JY, Kim JY, Park J, Lee WT, Lee JE. M2 phenotype microglia‐derived cytokine stimulates proliferation and neuronal differentiation of endogenous stem cells in ischemic brain. Exp Neurobiol. 2017;26:33‐41
Not in our library10.5607/en.2017.26.1.33
- 152.
Zhang ZG, Zhang L, Jiang Q, et al. VEGF enhances angiogenesis and promotes blood‐brain barrier leakage in the ischemic brain. J Clin Invest. 2000;106:829‐838
Not in our library10.1172/jci9369
- 153.
Wake H, Moorhouse AJ, Jinno S, Kohsaka S, Nabekura J. Resting microglia directly monitor the functional state of synapses in vivo and determine the fate of ischemic terminals. J Neurosci. 2009;29:3974‐3980
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.4363-08.2009
- 154.
Hughes AN, Appel B. Microglia phagocytose myelin sheaths to modify developmental myelination. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23:1055‐1066
Not in our library10.1038/s41593-020-0654-2
- 155.
Berghoff SA, Spieth L, Sun T, et al. Microglia facilitate repair of demyelinated lesions via post‐squalene sterol synthesis. Nat Neurosci. 2021;24:47‐60
Not in our library10.1038/s41593-020-00757-6
- 156.
Zareba J, Peri F. Microglial ‘fat shaming’ in development and disease. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2021;73:105‐109
Not in our library10.1016/j.ceb.2021.07.007
- 157.
Lampron A, Larochelle A, Laflamme N, et al. Inefficient clearance of myelin debris by microglia impairs remyelinating processes. J Exp Med. 2015;212:481‐495
Not in our library10.1084/jem.20141656
- 158.
Cunha MI, Su M, Cantuti‐Castelvetri L, et al. Pro‐inflammatory activation following demyelination is required for myelin clearance and oligodendrogenesis. J Exp Med. 2020;217
Not in our library10.1084/jem.20191390
- 159.
Marschallinger J, Iram T, Zardeneta M, et al. Lipid‐droplet‐accumulating microglia represent a dysfunctional and proinflammatory state in the aging brain. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23:194‐208
Not in our library10.1038/s41593-019-0566-1
- 160.
- 161.
Nguyen PT, Dorman LC, Pan S, et al. Microglial remodeling of the extracellular matrix promotes synapse plasticity. Cell. 2020;182:388‐403 e315
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.050
- 162.
Chang CF, Goods BA, Askenase MH, et al. Erythrocyte efferocytosis modulates macrophages towards recovery after intracerebral hemorrhage. J Clin Invest. 2018;128:607‐624
Not in our library10.1172/jci95612
- 163.
- 164.
Van Hove H, Martens L, Scheyltjens I, et al. A single‐cell atlas of mouse brain macrophages reveals unique transcriptional identities shaped by ontogeny and tissue environment. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22:1021‐1035
Not in our library10.1038/s41593-019-0393-4
- 165.
Goldmann T, Wieghofer P, Jordao MJ, et al. Origin, fate and dynamics of macrophages at central nervous system interfaces. Nat Immunol. 2016;17:797‐805
Not in our library10.1038/ni.3423
- 166.
Rajan WD, Wojtas B, Gielniewski B, et al. Defining molecular identity and fates of CNS‐border associated macrophages after ischemic stroke in rodents and humans. Neurobiol Dis. 2020;137:104722
Not in our library10.1016/j.nbd.2019.104722
- 167.
Masuda T, Sankowski R, Staszewski O, et al. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of mouse and human microglia at single‐cell resolution. Nature. 2019;566:388‐392
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-019-0924-x
- 168.
- 169.
Shi L, Rocha M, Zhang W, et al. Genome‐wide transcriptomic analysis of microglia reveals impaired responses in aged mice after cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2020;40:S49‐S66
Not in our library10.1177/0271678x20925655
- 170.
Yanguas‐Casas N, Crespo‐Castrillo A, Arevalo MA, Garcia‐Segura LM. Aging and sex: impact on microglia phagocytosis. Aging Cell. 2020;19:e13182
Not in our library10.1111/acel.13182
- 171.
Safaiyan S, Kannaiyan N, Snaidero N, et al. Age‐related myelin degradation burdens the clearance function of microglia during aging. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19:995‐998
Not in our library10.1038/nn.4325
- 172.
Perry VH, Holmes C. Microglial priming in neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10:217‐224
Not in our library10.1038/nrneurol.2014.38
- 173.
Ostwald SK, Wasserman J, Davis S. Medications, comorbidities, and medical complications in stroke survivors: the CAReS study. Rehabil Nurs. 2006;31:10‐14
Not in our library10.1002/j.2048-7940.2006.tb00004.x
- 174.
McCann SK, Lawrence CB. Comorbidity and age in the modelling of stroke: are we still failing to consider the characteristics of stroke patients? BMJ Open Sci. 2020;4:e100013
Not in our library10.1136/bmjos-2019-100013
- 175.
Justin Rucker A, Crowley SD. The role of macrophages in hypertension and its complications. Pflugers Arch. 2017;469:419‐430
Not in our library10.1007/s00424-017-1950-x
- 176.
Mehina EMF, Taylor S, Boghozian R, et al. Invasion of phagocytic galectin 3 expressing macrophages in the diabetic brain disrupts vascular repair. Sci Adv. 2021;7
Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.abg2712
- 177.
Ma S, Wang J, Wang Y, et al. Diabetes mellitus impairs White matter repair and long‐term functional deficits after cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2018;49:2453‐2463
Not in our library10.1161/strokeaha.118.021452
- 178.
- 179.
Dzik JM. The ancestry and cumulative evolution of immune reactions. Acta Biochim pol. 2010;57:443‐466.
Not in our library
- 180.
Harwani SC. Macrophages under pressure: the role of macrophage polarization in hypertension. Transl Res. 2018;191:45‐63
Not in our library10.1016/j.trsl.2017.10.011
- 181.
Calvillo L, Gironacci MM, Crotti L, Meroni PL, Parati G. Neuroimmune crosstalk in the pathophysiology of hypertension. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019;16:476‐490
Not in our library10.1038/s41569-019-0178-1
- 182.
Cited by papers we hold 2
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.