Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 16, 2026.

THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2017/18: Enzymes

Stephen PH Alexander, Doriano Fabbro, Eamonn Kelly and 9 more

British Journal of Pharmacology · 2017

doi:10.1111/bph.13877

Abstract

The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2017/18 provides concise overviews of the key properties of nearly 1800 human drug targets with an emphasis on selective pharmacology (where available), plus links to an open access knowledgebase of drug targets and their ligands ( www.guidetopharmacology.org ), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. Although the Concise Guide represents approximately 400 pages, the material presented is substantially reduced compared to information and links presented on the website. It provides a permanent, citable, point‐in‐time record that will survive database updates. The full contents of this section can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.13877/full . Enzymes are one of the eight major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being: G protein‐coupled receptors, ligand‐gated ion channels, voltage‐gated ion channels, other ion channels, nuclear hormone receptors, catalytic receptors and transporters. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside key references and suggestions for further reading. The landscape format of the Concise Guide is designed to facilitate comparison of related targets from material contemporary to mid‐2017, and supersedes data presented in the 2015/16 and 2013/14 Concise Guides and previous Guides to Receptors and Channels. It is produced in close conjunction with the Nomenclature Committee of the Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology (NC‐IUPHAR), therefore, providing official IUPHAR classification and nomenclature for human drug targets, where appropriate.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 16, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Conflict of interest

The authors state that there are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Overview

Enzymes are protein catalysts facilitating the conversion of substrates into products. The Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (NC‐IUBMB) classifies enzymes into families, using a four number code, on the basis of the reactions they catalyse. There are six main families:

EC 1.‐.‐.‐ Oxidoreductases;

EC 2.‐.‐.‐ Transferases;

EC 3.‐.‐.‐ Hydrolases;

EC 4.‐.‐.‐ Lyases;

EC 5.‐.‐.‐ Isomerases;

EC 6.‐.‐.‐ Ligases.

Although there are many more enzymes than receptors in biology, and many drugs that target prokaryotic enzymes are effective medicines, overall the number of enzyme drug targets is relatively small [392, 430], which is not to say that they are of modest importance.

The majority of drugs which act on enzymes act as inhibitors; one exception is metformin, which appears to stimulate activity of AMP‐activated protein kinase, albeit through an imprecisely‐defined mechanism. Kinetic assays allow discrimination of competitive, non‐competitive, and un‐competitive inhibitors. The majority of inhibitors are competitive (acting at the enzyme's ligand recognition site), non‐competitive (acting at a distinct site; potentially interfering with co‐factor or co‐enzyme binding) or of mixed type. One rare example of an uncompetitive inhibitor is lithium ions, which are effective inhibitors at inositol monophosphatase only in the presence of high substrate concentrations. Some inhibitors are irreversible, including a group known as suicide substrates, which bind to the ligand recognition site and then couple covalently to the enzyme. It is beyond the scope of the Guide to give mechanistic information about the inhibitors described, although generally this information is available from the indicated literature.

Many enzymes require additional entities for functional activity. Some of these are used in the catalytic steps, while others promote a particular conformational change. Co‐factors are tightly bound to the enzyme and include metal ions and heme groups. Co‐enzymes are typically small molecules which accept or donate functional groups to assist in the enzymatic reaction. Examples include ATP, NAD, NADP and S‐adenosylmethionine, as well as a number of vitamins, such as riboflavin (vitamin B1) and thiamine (vitamin B2). Where co‐factors/co‐enzymes have been identified, the Guide indicates their involvement.

Family structure

S275 Kinases (EC 2.7.x.x)

– AGC: Containing PKA, PKG, PKC families

– DMPK family

– GEK subfamily

– Other DMPK family kinases

S276 Rho kinase

– G protein‐coupled receptor kinases (GRKs)

– Beta‐adrenergic receptor kinases (βARKs)

– Opsin/rhodopsin kinases

– GRK4 subfamily

– MAST family

– NDR family

– PDK1 family

– Protein kinase A

– Akt (Protein kinase B)

S276 Protein kinase C (PKC)

S277 Alpha subfamily

S277 Delta subfamily

S277 Eta subfamily

– Iota subfamily

– Protein kinase G (PKG)

– Protein kinase N (PKN) family

– RSK family

– MSK subfamily

– p70 subfamily

– RSK subfamily

– RSKR subfamily

– RSKL family

– SGK family

– YANK family

– Atypical

– ABC1 family

– ABC1‐A subfamily

– ABC1‐B subfamily

– Alpha kinase family

– ChaK subfamily

– eEF2K subfamily

– Other alpha kinase family kinases

– BCR family

– Bromodomain kinase (BRDK) family

– G11 family

– Phosphatidyl inositol 3' kinase‐related kinases (PIKK) family

– ATR subfamily

S278 FRAP subfamily

– SMG1 subfamily

– TRRAP subfamily

– Other PIKK family kinases

– RIO family

– RIO1 subfamily

– RIO2 subfamily

– RIO3 subfamily

– PDHK family

– Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDHK) family

– TAF1 family

– TIF1 family

– CAMK: Calcium/calmodulin‐dependent protein kinases

– CAMK1 family

– CAMK2 family

– CAMK‐like (CAMKL) family

– AMPK subfamily

– BRSK subfamily

– CHK1 subfamily

– HUNK subfamily

– LKB subfamily

– MARK subfamily

– MELK subfamily

– NIM1 subfamily

– NuaK subfamily

– PASK subfamily

– QIK subfamily

– SNRK subfamily

– CAMK‐unique family

– CASK family

– DCAMKL family

– Death‐associated kinase (DAPK) family

– MAPK‐Activated Protein Kinase (MAPKAPK) family

– MAPKAPK subfamily

– MKN subfamily

– Myosin Light Chain Kinase (MLCK) family

– Phosphorylase kinase (PHK) family

– PIM family

– Protein kinase D (PKD) family

– PSK family

– RAD53 family

– Testis specific kinase (TSSK) family

– Trbl family

– Trio family

– CK1: Casein kinase 1

– Casein kinase 1 (CK1) family

– Tau tubulin kinase (TTBK) family

– Vaccina related kinase (VRK) family

– CMGC: Containing CDK, MAPK, GSK3, CLK families

– CLK family

S279 Cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK) family

– CCRK subfamily

– CDK1 subfamily

S279 CDK4 subfamily

– CDK5 subfamily

– CDK7 subfamily

– CDK8 subfamily

– CDK9 subfamily

– CDK10 subfamily

– CRK7 subfamily

– PITSLRE subfamily

– TAIRE subfamily

– Cyclin‐dependent kinase‐like (CDKL) family

– Dual‐specificity tyrosine‐(Y)‐phosphorylation regulated kinase (DYRK) family

– Dyrk1 subfamily

– Dyrk2 subfamily

– HIPK subfamily

– PRP4 subfamily

– Glycogen synthase kinase (GSK) family

S279 GSK subfamily

– Mitogen‐activated protein kinases (MAP kinases)

– ERK subfamily

– Erk7 subfamily

– JNK subfamily

– p38 subfamily

– nmo subfamily

– RCK family

– SRPK family

– Other protein kinases

– CAMKK family

– Meta subfamily

– Aurora kinase (Aur) family

– Bub family

– Bud32 family

– Casein kinase 2 (CK2) family

– CDC7 family

– Haspin family

– IKK family

– IRE family

– MOS family

– NAK family

– NIMA (never in mitosis gene a)

‐ related kinase (NEK) family

– NKF1 family

– NKF2 family

– NKF4 family

– NKF5 family

– NRBP family

– Numb‐associated kinase (NAK) family

– Other‐unique family

S280 Polo‐like kinase (PLK) family

– PEK family

– GCN2 subfamily

– PEK subfamily

– Other PEK family kinases

– SgK493 family

– Slob family

– TBCK family

– TOPK family

– Tousled‐like kinase (TLK) family

– TTK family

– Unc‐51‐like kinase (ULK) family

– VPS15 family

– WEE family

– Wnk family

– Miscellaneous protein kinases

– actin‐binding proteins ADF family

– Twinfilin subfamily

– SCY1 family

– Hexokinases

– STE: Homologs of yeast Sterile 7, Sterile 11, Sterile 20 kinases

S280 STE7 family

– STE11 family

– STE20 family

– FRAY subfamily

– KHS subfamily

– MSN subfamily

– MST subfamily

– NinaC subfamily

– PAKA subfamily

– PAKB subfamily

– SLK subfamily

– STLK subfamily

– TAO subfamily

– YSK subfamily

– STE20 family

– STE‐unique family

– TK: Tyrosine kinase

– Non‐receptor tyrosine kinases (nRTKs)

S281 Abl family

S281 Ack family

– Csk family

– Fak family

– Fer family

S281 Janus kinase (JakA) family

S282 Src family

– Syk family

S282 Tec family

– TKL: Tyrosine kinase‐like

– Interleukin‐1 receptor‐associated kinase (IRAK) family

– Leucine‐rich repeat kinase (LRRK) family

– LIM domain kinase (LISK) family

– LIMK subfamily

– TESK subfamily

– Mixed Lineage Kinase (MLK) family

– HH498 subfamily

– ILK subfamily

– LZK subfamily

– MLK subfamily

– TAK1 subfamily

S283 RAF family

– Receptor interacting protein kinase (RIPK) family

– TKL‐unique family

S284 Peptidases and proteinases

– AA: Aspartic (A) Peptidases

S284 A1: Pepsin

– AD: Aspartic (A) Peptidases

S284 A22: Presenilin

– CA: Cysteine (C) Peptidases

– C1: Papain

– C2: Calpain

– C12: Ubiquitin C‐terminal hydrolase

– C19: Ubiquitin‐specific protease

– C54: Aut2 peptidase

– C101: OTULIN peptidase

– CD: Cysteine (C) Peptidases

– C13: Legumain

S284 C14: Caspase

– CE: Cysteine (C) Peptidases

– C48: Ulp1 endopeptidase

– M‐: Metallo (M) Peptidases

– M79: Prenyl protease 2

– MA: Metallo (M) Peptidases

S285 M1: Aminopeptidase N

S285 M2: Angiotensin‐converting (ACE and ACE2)

S286 M10: Matrix metallopeptidase

S286 M12: Astacin/Adamalysin

– M13: Neprilysin

– M49: Dipeptidyl‐peptidase III

– MC: Metallo (M) Peptidases

– M14: Carboxypeptidase A

– ME: Metallo (M) Peptidases

– M16: Pitrilysin

– MF: Metallo (M) Peptidases

– M17: Leucyl aminopeptidase

– MG: Metallo (M) Peptidases

– M24: Methionyl aminopeptidase

– MH: Metallo (M) Peptidases

– M18: Aminopeptidase I

– M20: Carnosine dipeptidase

S286 M28: Aminopeptidase Y

– MJ: Metallo (M) Peptidases

S287 M19: Membrane dipeptidase

– MP: Metallo (M) Peptidases

– M67: PSMD14 peptidase

– PA: Serine (S) Peptidases

S287 S1: Chymotrypsin

– PB: Threonine (T) Peptidases

– C44: Phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate amidotransferase

S288 T1: Proteasome

– T2: Glycosylasparaginase precursor

– PC: Cysteine (C) Peptidases

– C26: Gamma‐glutamyl hydrolase

– SB: Serine (S) Peptidases

S289 S8: Subtilisin

– SC: Serine (S) Peptidases

S289 S9: Prolyl oligopeptidase

– S10: Carboxypeptidase Y

– S28: Lysosomal Pro‐Xaa carboxypeptidase

– S33: Prolyl aminopeptidase

– AAA ATPases

S290 Acetylcholine turnover

S291 Adenosine turnover

S292 Amino acid hydroxylases

S293 L‐Arginine turnover

S294 2.1.1.‐ Protein arginine N‐methyltransferases

S294 Arginase

S294 Arginine:glycine amidinotransferase

S294 Dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolases

S295 Nitric oxide synthases

S296 Carboxylases and decarboxylases

S296 Carboxylases

S298 Decarboxylases

S299 Catecholamine turnover

S302 Ceramide turnover

S302 Serine palmitoyltransferase

– 3‐ketodihydrosphingosine reductase

S303 Ceramide synthase

S304 Sphingolipid Δ4‐desaturase

S304 Sphingomyelin synthase

S305 Sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase

S305 Neutral sphingomyelinase coupling factors

S305 Ceramide glucosyltransferase

S306 Acid ceramidase

S306 Neutral ceramidases

S307 Alkaline ceramidases

S307 Ceramide kinase

S308 Chromatin modifying enzymes

– Enzymatic bromodomain‐containing proteins

– Bromodomain kinase (BRDK) family

– TAF1 family

– TIF1 family

– 1.14.11.‐ Histone demethylases

S309 2.1.1.‐ Protein arginine N‐methyltransferases

– 2.1.1.43 Histone methyltransferases (HMTs)

– 2.3.1.48 Histone acetyltransferases (HATs)

S309 3.5.1.‐ Histone deacetylases (HDACs)

– 3.6.1.3 ATPases

S310 Cyclic nucleotide turnover/signalling

S310 Adenylyl cyclases (ACs)

S311 Exchange protein activated by cyclic AMP (EPACs)

S312 Nitric oxide (NO)‐sensitive (soluble) guanylyl cyclase

S313 Phosphodiesterases, 3Š,5Š‐cyclic nucleotide (PDEs)

S317 Cytochrome P450

S317 CYP1 family

S317 CYP2 family

S318 CYP3 family

S319 CYP4 family

S320 CYP5, CYP7 and CYP8 families

S320 CYP11, CYP17, CYP19, CYP20 and CYP21 families

S321 CYP24, CYP26 and CYP27 families

S321 CYP39, CYP46 and CYP51 families

S323 Endocannabinoid turnover

S323 N‐Acylethanolamine turnover

S324 2‐Acylglycerol ester turnover

S325 Eicosanoid turnover

S325 Cyclooxygenase

S326 Prostaglandin synthases

S327 Lipoxygenases

S328 Leukotriene and lipoxin metabolism

S329 GABA turnover

S330 Glycerophospholipid turnover

S331 Phosphoinositide‐specific phospholipase C

S332 Phospholipase A2

S333 Phosphatidylcholine‐specific phospholipase D

S334 Lipid phosphate phosphatases

S335 Phosphatidylinositol kinases

S336 Phosphatidylinositol phosphate kinases

S339 Haem oxygenase

S340 Hydrogen sulphide synthesis

S341 Hydrolases

S342 Inositol phosphate turnover

S342 Inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate 3‐kinases

S343 Inositol polyphosphate phosphatases

S343 Inositol monophosphatase

S344 Lanosterol biosynthesis pathway

– LPA synthesis

S346 Nucleoside synthesis and metabolism

S347 Sphingosine 1‐phosphate turnover

S348 Sphingosine kinase

S348 Sphingosine 1‐phosphate phosphatase

S349 Sphingosine 1‐phosphate lyase

S349 Thyroid hormone turnover

– 1.‐.‐.‐ Oxidoreductases

– 1.1.1.42 Isocitrate dehydrogenases

– 1.4.3.13 Lysyl oxidases

– 1.13.11.‐ Dioxygenases

S350 1.14.11.29 2‐oxoglutarate oxygenases

S351 1.14.13.9 kynurenine 3‐monooxygenase

– 1.17.4.1 Ribonucleoside‐diphosphate reductases

– 2.1.1.‐ Methyltransferases

– 2.1.2.‐ Hydroxymethyl‐, formyl‐ and related transferases

– 2.3.‐.‐ Acyltransferases

– 2.4.2.1 Purine‐nucleoside phosphorylase

S351 2.4.2.30 poly(ADP‐ribose)polymerases

S352 2.5.1.58 Protein farnesyltransferase

– 2.6.1.42 Branched‐chain‐amino‐acid transaminase

– 3.1.‐.‐ Ester bond enzymes

– 3.1.1.‐ Carboxylic Ester Hydrolases

– 3.2.1.‐ Glycosidases

– 3.4.21.46 Complement factor D

S353 3.5.1.‐ Histone deacetylases (HDACs)

– 3.5.1.2 Glutaminases

S353 3.5.3.15 Peptidyl arginine deiminases (PADI)

– 3.6.5.2 Small monomeric GTPases

S354 RAS subfamily

– RAB subfamily

S355 4.2.1.1 Carbonate dehydratases

– 5.‐.‐.‐ Isomerases

– 5.2.‐.‐ Cis‐trans‐isomerases

S355 5.99.1.2 DNA Topoisomerases

– 6.3.3.‐ Cyclo‐ligases

Overview

Protein kinases (E.C. 2.7.11.‐) use the co‐substrate ATP to phosphorylate serine and/or threonine residues on target proteins. Analysis of the human genome suggests the presence of 518 protein kinases in man (divided into 15 subfamilies), with over 100 protein kinase‐like pseudogenes [335]. It is beyond the scope of the Concise Guide to list all these protein kinase activities, but full listings are available on the 'Detailed page' provided for each enzyme.

Most inhibitors of these enzymes have been assessed in cell‐free investigations and so may appear to 'lose' potency and selectivity in intact cell assays. In particular, ambient ATP concentrations may be influential in responses to inhibitors, since the majority are directed at the ATP binding site [110].

Rho kinase (also known as P160ROCK, Rho‐activated kinase) is activated by members of the Rho small G protein family, which are activated by GTP exchange factors, such as ARHGEF1(Q92888, p115‐RhoGEF), which in turn may be activated by Gα 12/13 subunits [282].

Further reading on Rho kinases

Feng, Y, PV LoGrasso, O Defert and R Li 2016 Rho Kinase (ROCK) Inhibitors and Their Therapeutic Potential J Med Chem 59: 2269‐300 [PMID:26486225]

Nishioka, T, MH Shohag, M Amano and K Kaibuchi 2015 Developing novel methods to search for substrates of protein kinases such as Rho‐kinase Biochim Biophys Acta 1854: 1663‐6 [PMID:25770685]

Shimokawa, H, S Sunamura and K Satoh 2016 RhoA/Rho‐Kinase in the Cardiovascular System Circ Res 118: 352‐66 [PMID:26838319]

Overview

Protein kinase C is the target for the tumour‐promoting phorbol esters, such as tetradecanoyl‐β‐phorbol acetate (TPA, also known as phorbol 12‐myristate 13‐acetate).

Classical protein kinase C isoforms: PKCα, PKCβ, and PKCγ are activated by Ca2+ and diacylglycerol, and may be inhibited by GF109203X, calphostin C, Gö 6983, chelerythrine and Ro31‐8220.

Novel protein kinase C isoforms: PKCδ, PKCϵ, PKCη, PKCθ and PKCμ are activated by diacylglycerol and may be inhibited by calphostin C, Gö 6983 and chelerythrine.

Atypical protein kinase C isoforms:PKCι, PKCζ.

Further reading on Protein kinase C

Igumenova TI. (2015) Dynamics and Membrane Interactions of Protein Kinase C. Biochemistry 54: 4953‐68 [PMID:26214365]

Newton AC et al. (2017) Reversing the Paradigm: Protein Kinase C as a Tumor Suppressor. Trends Pharmacol Sci 38: 438‐447 [PMID:28283201]

Salzer E et al. (2016) Protein Kinase C delta: a Gatekeeper of Immune Homeostasis. J Clin Immunol 36: 631‐40 [PMID:27541826]

Further reading on FRAP subfamily

Hukelmann JL et al. (2016) The cytotoxic T cell proteome and its shaping by the kinase mTOR. Nat. Immunol. 17: 104‐12 [PMID:26551880]

Saxton RA et al. (2017) mTOR Signaling in Growth, Metabolism, and Disease. Cell 169: 361‐371 [PMID:28388417]

Overview

The development of CDK inhibitors as anticancer drugs is reviewed in [508], with detailed content covering CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitors under clinical evaluation.

Further reading on GSK subfamily

Beurel E et al. (2015) Glycogen synthase kinase‐3 (GSK3): regulation, actions, and diseases. Pharmacol Ther 148: 114‐31 [PMID:25435019]

Domoto T et al. (2016) Glycogen synthase kinase‐3beta is a pivotal mediator of cancer invasion and resistance to therapy. Cancer Sci 107: 1363‐1372 [PMID:27486911]

Khan I et al. (2017) Natural and synthetic bioactive inhibitors of glycogen synthase kinase. Eur J Med Chem 125: 464‐477 [PMID:27689729]

Maqbool M et al. (2016) Pivotal role of glycogen synthase kinase‐3: A therapeutic target for Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Med Chem 107: 63‐81 [PMID:26562543]

Further reading on Kinases (EC 2.7.x.x)

Eglen R et al. (2011) Drug discovery and the human kinome: recent trends. Pharmacol. Ther. 130: 144‐56 [PMID:21256157]

Graves LM et al. (2013) The dynamic nature of the kinome. Biochem. J. 450: 1‐8 [PMID:23343193]

Liu Q et al. (2013) Developing irreversible inhibitors of the protein kinase cysteinome. Chem. Biol. 20: 146‐59 [PMID:23438744]

Martin KJ et al. (2012) Selective kinase inhibitors as tools for neuroscience research. Neuropharmacology 63: 1227‐37 [PMID:22846224]

Tarrant MK et al. (2009) The chemical biology of protein phosphorylation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78: 797‐825 [PMID:19489734]

Wu‐Zhang AX et al. (2013) Protein kinase C pharmacology: refining the toolbox. Biochem. J. 452: 195‐209 [PMID:23662807]

Overview

Peptidases and proteinases hydrolyse peptide bonds, and can be simply divided on the basis of whether terminal peptide bonds are cleaved (exopeptidases and exoproteinases) at the amino terminus (aminopeptidases) or carboxy terminus (carboxypeptidases). Non‐terminal peptide bonds are cleaved by endopeptidases and endoproteinases, which are divided into serine endopeptidases (EC 3.4.21.‐), cysteine endopeptidases (EC 3.4.22.‐), aspartate endopeptidases (EC 3.4.23.‐), metalloendopeptidases (EC 3.4.24.‐) and threonine endopeptidases (EC 3.4.25.‐).

Since it is beyond the scope of the Guide to list all peptidase and proteinase activities, this summary focuses on selected enzymes of significant pharmacological interest that have ligands (mostly small‐molecules) directed against them. For those interested in detailed background we recommend the MEROPS database [450] (with whom we collaborate) as an information resource [432].

Presenilin (PS)‐1 or ‐2 act as the catalytic component/essential co‐factor of the γ‐secretase complex responsible for the final carboxy‐terminal cleavage of amyloid precursor protein (APP) [260] in the generation of amyloid beta (Aβ) [7, 510]. Given that the accumulation and aggregation of Aβ in the brain is pivotal in the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD), inhibition of PS activity is one mechanism being investigated as a therapeutic option for AD [187]. Several small molecule inhibitors of PS‐1 have been investigated, with some reaching early clinical trials, but none have been formally approved. Dewji et al. (2015) have reported that small peptide fragments of human PS‐1 can significantly inhibit Aβ production (total Aβ, Aβ40 and Aβ42) both in vitro and when infused in to the brains of APP transgenic mice [119]. The most active small peptides in this report were P4 and P8, from the amino‐terminal domain of PS‐1.

Information on members of this family may be found in the online database.

Caspases, (E.C. 3.4.22.‐) which derive their name from Cysteine ASPartate‐specific proteASES, include at least two families; initiator caspases (caspases 2, 8, 9 and 10), which are able to hydrolyse and activate a second family of effector caspases (caspases 3, 6 and 7), which themselves are able to hydrolyse further cellular proteins to bring about programmed cell death. Caspases are heterotetrameric, being made up of two pairs of subunits, generated by a single gene product, which is proteolysed to form the mature protein. Members of the mammalian inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAP) are able to bind the procaspases, thereby preventing maturation to active proteinases.

Information on members of this family may be found in the online database.

Comments

CARD16 (Caspase recruitment domain‐containing protein 16, caspase‐1 inhibitor COP, CARD only domain‐containing protein 1, pseudo interleukin‐1β converting enzyme, pseudo‐ICE, ENSG00000204397) shares sequence similarity with some of the caspases.

Overview

Aminopeptidases catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino (N) terminus of protein or peptide substrates, and are involved in many essential cellular functions. Members of this enzyme family may be monomeric or multi‐subunit complexes, and many are zinc metalloenzymes [522].

Information on members of this family may be found in the online database.

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) are calcium‐ and zinc‐dependent proteinases regulating the extracellular matrix and are often divided (e.g. [545]) on functional and structural bases into gelatinases, collagenases, stromyelinases and matrilysins, as well as membrane type‐MMP (MT‐MMP).

Comments

A number of small molecule ‘broad spectrum’ inhibitors of MMP have been described, including marimastat and batimastat.

Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase (TIMP) proteins are endogenous inhibitors acting to chelate MMP proteins: TIMP1(TIMP1, P01033), TIMP2(TIMP2, P16035), TIMP3(TIMP3, P35625), TIMP4(TIMP4, Q99727)

Overview

ADAM (A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinase domain containing proteins) metalloproteinases cleave cell‐surface or transmembrane proteins to generate soluble and membrane‐limited products.

ADAMTS (with thrombospondin motifs) metalloproteinases cleave cell‐surface or transmembrane proteins to generate soluble and membrane‐limited products.

Information on members of this family may be found in the online database.

Comments

Additional ADAM family members include AC123767.2 (cDNA FLJ58962, moderately similar to mouse ADAM3, ENSG00000231168), AL160191.3 (ADAM21‐like protein, ENSG00000235812), AC136428.3‐2 (ENSG00000185520) and ADAMDEC1 (decysin 1, ENSG00000134028).

Other ADAMTS family members include AC104758.12‐5 (FLJ00317 protein Fragment ENSG00000231463), AC139425.3‐1 (ENSG00000225577), and AC126339.6‐1 (ENSG00000225734).

Folate hydrolase is also known as NAALADase as it is responsible for the hydrolysis of N‐acetaspartylglutamate to form N‐acetylaspartate and L‐glutamate. In the gut, the enzyme assists in the assimilation of folate by hydrolysing dietary poly‐gamma‐glutamylfolate. The enzyme is highly expressed in the prostate, and its expression is up‐regulated in cancerous tissue. A tagged version of the antibody capromab has been used for imaging purposes.

Overview

The T1 macropain beta subunits form the catalytic proteinase core of the 20S proteasome complex [93]. This catalytic core enables the degradation of peptides with Arg, Phe, Tyr, Leu, and Glu adjacent to the cleavage site. The β5 subunit is the principal target of the approved drug proteasome inhibitor bortezomib.

One member of this family has garnered intense interest as a clinical drug target. As liver PCSK9 acts to maintain cholesterol homeostasis, it has become a target of intense interest for clinical drug development. Inhibition of PCSK9 can lower low‐density cholesterol (LDL‐C) by clearing LDLR‐bound LDL particles, thereby lowering circulating cholesterol levels. It is hypothesised that this action may improve outcomes in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [315, 452, 501]. Therapeutics which inhibit PCSK9 are viewed as potentially lucrative replacements for statins, upon statin patent expiry. Several monoclonal antibodies including alirocumab, evolocumab, bococizumab, RG‐7652 and LY3015014 are under development. One RNAi therapeutic, code named ALN‐PCS02, is also in development [106, 147, 155].

Information on members of this family may be found in the online database.

Acetylcholine is familiar as a neurotransmitter in the central nervous system and in the periphery. In the somatic nervous system, it activates nicotinic acetylcholine receptors at the skeletal neuromuscular junction. It is also employed in the autonomic nervous system, in both parasympathetic and sympathetic branches; in the former, at the smooth muscle neuromuscular junction, activating muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. In the latter, acetylcholine is involved as a neurotransmitter at the ganglion, activating nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Acetylcholine is synthesised in neurones through the action of choline O‐acetyltransferase and metabolised after release through the extracellular action of acetylcholinesterase and cholinesterase. Choline is accumulated from the extracellular medium by selective transporters (see SLC5A7 and the SLC44 family). Acetylcholine is accumulated in synaptic vesicles through the action of the vesicular acetylcholine transporter SLC18A3.

Comments

A number of organophosphorus compounds inhibit acetylcholinesterase and cholinesterase irreversibly, including pesticides such as chlorpyrifos‐oxon, and nerve agents such as tabun, soman and sarin. AChE is unusual in its exceptionally high turnover rate which has been calculated at 740 000/min/molecule [570].

Further reading on Acetylcholine turnover

Li Q et al. (2017) Recent progress in the identification of selective butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Med Chem 132: 294‐309 [PMID:28371641]

Lockridge O. (2015) Review of human butyrylcholinesterase structure, function, genetic variants, history of use in the clinic, and potential therapeutic uses. Pharmacol Ther 148: 34‐46 [PMID:25448037]

Masson P et al. (2016) Slow‐binding inhibition of cholinesterases, pharmacological and toxicological relevance. Arch Biochem Biophys 593: 60‐8 [PMID:26874196]

Rotundo RL. (2017) Biogenesis, assembly and trafficking of acetylcholinesterase. J Neurochem [PMID:28326552]

Silman I et al. (2017) Recent developments in structural studies on acetylcholinesterase. J Neurochem [PMID:28503857]

Overview

A multifunctional, ubiquitous molecule, adenosine acts at cell‐surface G protein‐coupled receptors, as well as numerous enzymes, including protein kinases and adenylyl cyclase. Extracellular adenosine is thought to be produced either by export or by metabolism, predominantly through ecto‐5'‐nucleotidase activity (also producing inorganic phosphate). It is inactivated either by extracellular metabolism via adenosine deaminase (also producing ammonia) or, following uptake by nucleoside transporters, via adenosine deaminase or adenosine kinase (requiring ATP as co‐substrate). Intracellular adenosine may be produced by cytosolic 5'‐nucleotidases or through S‐adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase (also producing L‐homocysteine).

Comments

An extracellular adenosine deaminase activity, termed ADA2 or adenosine deaminase growth factor (ADGF, CECR1, Q9NZK5) has been identified [101, 331], which is insensitive to EHNA[595]. Other forms of adenosine deaminase act on ribonucleic acids and may be divided into two families: ADAT1(Q9BUB4) deaminates transfer RNA; ADAR(EC 3.5.4.37, also known as 136 kDa double‐stranded RNA‐binding protein, P136, K88DSRBP, Interferon‐inducible protein 4); ADARB1 (EC 3.5.‐.‐,, also known as dsRNA adenosine deaminase) and ADARB2 (EC 3.5.‐.‐, also known as dsRNA adenosine deaminase B2, RNA‐dependent adenosine deaminase 3) act on double‐stranded RNA. Particular polymorphisms of the ADA gene result in loss‐of‐function and severe combined immunodeficiency syndrome. Adenosine deaminase is able to complex with dipeptidyl peptidase IV (EC 3.4.14.5, DPP4, also known as T‐cell activation antigen CD26, TP103, adenosine deaminase complexing protein 2) to form a cell‐surface activity [259].

Further reading on Adenosine turnover

Boison D. (2013) Adenosine kinase: exploitation for therapeutic gain. Pharmacol. Rev. 65: 906‐43 [PMID:23592612]

Cortés A et al. (2015) Moonlighting adenosine deaminase: a target protein for drug development. Med Res Rev 35: 85‐125 [PMID:24933472]

Nishikura K (2016) A‐to‐I editing of coding and non‐coding RNAs by ADARs. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 17: 83‐96 [PMID:26648264]

Sawynok J (2016) Adenosine receptor targets for pain. Neuroscience 338: 1‐18 [PMID:26500181]

Xiao Y et al. (2015) Role of S‐adenosylhomocysteine in cardiovascular disease and its potential epigenetic mechanism. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 67: 158‐66 [PMID:26117455]

Overview

The amino acid hydroxylases (monooxygenases), EC.1.14.16.‐, are iron‐containing enzymes which utilise molecular oxygen and sapropterin as co‐substrate and co‐factor, respectively. In humans, as well as in other mammals, there are two distinct L‐Tryptophan hydroxylase 2 genes. In humans, these genes are located on chromosomes 11 and 12 and encode two different homologous enzymes, TPH1 and TPH2.

Further reading on Amino acid hydroxylases

Bauer IE et al. (2015) Serotonergic gene variation in substance use pharmacotherapy: a systematic review. Pharmacogenomics 16: 1307‐14 [PMID:26265436]

Daubner SC et al. (2011) Tyrosine hydroxylase and regulation of dopamine synthesis. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 508: 1‐12 [PMID:21176768]

Flydal MI et al. (2013) Phenylalanine hydroxylase: function, structure, and regulation. IUBMB Life 65: 341‐9 [PMID:23457044]

Roberts KM et al. (2013) Mechanisms of tryptophan and tyrosine hydroxylase. IUBMB Life 65: 350‐7 [PMID:23441081]

Tekin I et al. (2014) Complex molecular regulation of tyrosine hydroxylase. J Neural Transm 121: 1451‐81 [PMID:24866693]

Waloen K et al. (2017) Tyrosine and tryptophan hydroxylases as therapeutic targets in human disease. Expert Opin Ther Targets 21: 167‐180 [PMID:27973928]

Overview

L‐arginine is a basic amino acid with a guanidino sidechain. As an amino acid, metabolism of L‐arginine to form L‐ornithine, catalysed by arginase, forms the last step of the urea production cycle. L‐Ornithine may be utilised as a precursor of polyamines (see Carboxylases and Decarboxylases) or recycled via L‐argininosuccinic acid to L‐arginine. L‐Arginine may itself be decarboxylated to form agmatine, although the prominence of this pathway in human tissues is uncertain. L‐Arginine may be used as a precursor for guanidoacetic acid formation in the creatine synthesis pathway under the influence of arginine:glycine amidinotransferase with L‐ornithine as a byproduct. Nitric oxide synthase uses L‐arginine to generate nitric oxide, with L‐citrulline also as a byproduct.

L‐Arginine in proteins may be subject to post‐translational modification through methylation, catalysed by protein arginine methyltransferases. Subsequent proteolysis can liberate asymmetric NG,NG‐dimethyl‐L‐arginine(ADMA), which is an endogenous inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase activities. ADMA is hydrolysed by dimethylarginine dimethylhydrolase activities to generate L‐citrulline and dimethylamine.

Further reading on L‐Arginine turnover

Lai L et al. (2016) Modulating DDAH/NOS Pathway to Discover Vasoprotective Insulin Sensitizers. J Diabetes Res 2016: 1982096 [PMID:26770984]

Pekarova M et al. (2015) The crucial role of l‐arginine in macrophage activation: What you need to know about it. Life Sci 137: 44‐8 [PMID:26188591]

Pudlo M et al. (2017) Arginase Inhibitors: A Rational Approach Over One Century. Med Res Rev 37: 475‐513 [PMID:27862081]

Sudar‐Milovanovic E et al. (2016) Benefits of L‐Arginine on Cardiovascular. System Mini Rev Med Chem 16: 94‐103 [PMID:26471966]

Overview

Protein arginine N‐methyltransferases (PRMT, EC 2.1.1.‐) encompass histone arginine N‐methyltransferases (PRMT4, PRMT7, EC 2.1.1.125) and myelin basic protein N‐methyltransferases (PRMT7, EC 2.1.1.126). They are dimeric or tetrameric enzymes which use S‐adenosyl methionine as a methyl donor, generating S‐adenosylhomocysteine as a by‐product. They generate both mono‐methylated and di‐methylated products; these may be symmetric (SDMA) or asymmetric (NG,NG‐dimethyl‐L‐arginine) versions, where both guanidine nitrogens are monomethylated or one of the two is dimethylated, respectively.

Information on members of this family may be found in the online database.

Arginase (EC 3.5.3.1) are manganese‐containing isoforms, which appear to show differential distribution, where the ARG1 isoform predominates in the liver and erythrocytes, while ARG2 is associated more with the kidney.

Information on members of this family may be found in the online database.

Comments

Nω‐hydroxyarginine, an intermediate in NOS metabolism of L‐arginine acts as a weak inhibitor and may function as a physiological regulator of arginase activity. Although isoform‐selective inhibitors of arginase are not available, examples of inhibitors selective for arginase compared to NOS are Nω‐hydroxy‐nor‐L‐arginine[525], S‐(2‐boronoethyl)‐L‐cysteine[97, 268] and 2(S)‐amino‐6‐boronohexanoic acid [24, 97].

Overview

Dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolases (DDAH, EC 3.5.3.18) are cytoplasmic enzymes which hydrolyse NG,NG‐dimethyl‐L‐arginine to form dimethylamine and L‐citrulline.

Nitric oxide synthases (NOS, E.C. 1.14.13.39) are a family of oxidoreductases that synthesize nitric oxide (NO.) via the NADPH and oxygen‐dependent consumption of L‐arginine with the resultant by‐product, L‐citrulline. There are 3 NOS isoforms and they are related by their capacity to produce NO, highly conserved organization of functional domains and significant homology at the amino acid level. NOS isoforms are functionally distinguished by the cell type where they are expressed, intracellular targeting and transcriptional and post‐translation mechanisms regulating enzyme activity. The nomenclature suggested by NC‐IUPHAR of NOS I, II and III [363] has not gained wide acceptance, and the 3 isoforms are more commonly referred to as neuronal NOS (nNOS), inducible NOS (iNOS) and endothelial NOS (eNOS) which reflect the location of expression (nNOS and eNOS) and inducible expression (iNOS). All are dimeric enzymes that shuttle electrons from NADPH, which binds to a C‐terminal reductase domain, through the flavins FAD and FMN to the oxygenase domain of the other monomer to enable the BH4‐dependent reduction of heme bound oxygen for insertion into the substrate, L‐arginine. Electron flow from reductase to oxygenase domain is controlled by calmodulin binding to canonical calmodulin binding motif located between these domains. eNOS and nNOS isoforms are activated at concentrations of calcium greater than 100 nM, while iNOS shows higher affinity for Ca2+/calmodulin(CALM1 CALM2 CALM3, P62158) with great avidity and is essentially calcium‐independent and constitutively active. Efficient stimulus‐dependent coupling of nNOS and eNOS is achieved via subcellular targeting through respective N‐terminal PDZ and fatty acid acylation domains whereas iNOS is largely cytosolic and function is independent of intracellular location. nNOS is primarily expressed in the brain and neuronal tissue, iNOS in immune cells such as macrophages and eNOS in the endothelial layer of the vasculature although exceptions in other cells have been documented. L‐NAME and related modified arginine analogues are inhibitors of all three isoforms, with IC50 values in the micromolar range.

Comments

The reductase domain of NOS catalyses the reduction of cytochrome c and other redox‐active dyes [345]. NADPH:O2 oxidoreductase catalyses the formation of superoxide anion/H2O2 in the absence of L‐arginine and sapropterin.

Further reading on Nitric oxide synthases

Bogdan, C. (2015) Nitric oxide synthase in innate and adaptive immunity: An update. Trends Immunol 36: 161‐78 [PMID:25687683]

Lundberg JO et al. (2015) Strategies to increase nitric oxide signalling in cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov 14: 623‐41 [PMID:26265312]

Oliveira‐Paula GH et al. (2016) Endothelial nitric oxide synthase: From biochemistry and gene structure to clinical implications of NOS3 polymorphisms. Gene 575: 584‐99 [PMID:26428312]

Shu X et al. (2015) Endothelial nitric oxide synthase in the microcirculation. Cell Mol Life Sci 72: 4561‐75 [PMID:26390975]

Zhao Y et al. (2015) Vascular nitric oxide: Beyond eNOS. J Pharmacol Sci 129: 83‐94 [PMID:26499181]

Overview

The carboxylases allow the production of new carbon‐carbon bonds by introducing HCO3 ‐ or CO2 into target molecules. Two groups of carboxylase activities, some of which are bidirectional, can be defined on the basis of the cofactor requirement, making use of biotin (EC 6.4.1.‐) or vitamin K hydroquinone (EC 4.1.1.‐).

Comments

Dicarboxylic acids including citric acid are able to activate ACC1/ACC2 activity allosterically. PCC is able to function in forward and reverse modes as a ligase (carboxylase) or lyase (decarboxylase) activity, respectively. Loss‐of‐function mutations in GGCX are associated with clotting disorders.

Overview

The decarboxylases generate CO2 and the indicated products from acidic substrates, requiring pyridoxal phosphate or pyruvic acid as a co‐factor.

Further reading on Carboxylases and decarboxylases

Bale S et al. (2010) Structural biology of S‐adenosylmethionine decarboxylase. Amino Acids 38: 451‐60 [PMID:19997761]

Jitrapakdee S et al. (2008) Structure, mechanism and regulation of pyruvate carboxylase. Biochem. J. 413: 369‐87 [PMID:18613815]

Lietzan AD et al. (2014) Functionally diverse biotin‐dependent enzymes with oxaloacetate decarboxylase activity. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 544: 75‐86 [PMID:24184447]

Moya‐García AA et al. (2009) Structural features of mammalian histidine decarboxylase reveal the basis for specific inhibition. Br. J. Pharmacol. 157: 4‐13 [PMID:19413567]

Tong L. (2013) Structure and function of biotin‐dependent carboxylases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 70: 863‐91 [PMID:22869039]

Vance JE et al. (2013) Formation and function of phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylethanolamine in mammalian cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1831: 543‐54 [PMID:22960354]

Overview

Catecholamines are defined by the presence of two adjacent hydroxyls on a benzene ring with a sidechain containing an amine. The predominant catacholamines in mammalian biology are the neurotransmitter/hormones dopamine, (‐)‐noradrenaline (norepinephrine) and (‐)‐adrenaline(epinephrine). These hormone/transmitters are synthesized by sequential metabolism from L‐phenylalanine via L‐tyrosine. Hydroxylation of L‐tyrosine generates levodopa, which is decarboxylated to form dopamine. Hydroxylation of the ethylamine sidechain generates (‐)‐noradrenaline (norepinephrine), which can be methylated to form (‐)‐adrenaline(epinephrine). In particular neuronal and adrenal chromaffin cells, the catecholamines dopamine, (‐)‐noradrenaline and (‐)‐adrenaline are accumulated into vesicles under the influence of the vesicular monoamine transporters (VMAT1/SLC18A1 and VMAT2/SLC18A2). After release into the synapse or the bloodstream, catecholamines are accumulated through the action cell‐surface transporters, primarily the dopamine (DAT/SLC6A3) and norepinephrine transporter (NET/SLC6A2). The primary routes of metabolism of these catecholamines are oxidation via monoamine oxidase activities of methylation via catechol O‐methyltransferase.

Further reading on Catecholamine turnover

Dauvilliers Y et al. (2015) Catechol‐O‐methyltransferase, dopamine, and sleep‐wake regulation. Sleep Med Rev 22: 47‐53 [PMID:25466290]

Deshwal S et al. (2017) Emerging role of monoamine oxidase as a therapeutic target for cardiovascular disease. Curr Opin Pharmacol 33: 64‐69 [PMID:28528298]

Fisar Z. (2016) Drugs related to monoamine oxidase activity. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 69: 112‐24 [PMID:26944656]

Ramsay RR. (2016). Molecular aspects of monoamine oxidase B. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 69: 81‐9 [PMID:26891670]

Waloen K et al. (2017). Tyrosine and tryptophan hydroxylases as therapeutic targets in human disease. Expert Opin Ther Targets 21: 167‐180 [PMID:27973928]

Overview

Ceramides are a family of sphingophospholipids synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum, which mediate cell stress responses, including apoptosis, autophagy and senescence, Serine palmitoyltransferase generates 3‐ketosphinganine, which is reduced to sphinganine(dihydrosphingosine). N‐Acylation allows the formation of dihydroceramides, which are subsequently reduced to form ceramides. Once synthesized, ceramides are trafficked from the ER to the Golgi bound to the ceramide transfer protein, CERT (COL4A3BP, Q9Y5P4). Ceramide can be metabolized via multiple routes, ensuring tight regulation of its cellular levels. Addition of phosphocholine generates sphingomyelin while carbohydrate is added to form glucosyl‐ or galactosylceramides. Ceramidase re‐forms sphingosine or sphinganine from ceramide or dihydroceramide. Phosphorylation of ceramide generates ceramide phosphate. The determination of accurate kinetic parameters for many of the enzymes in the sphingolipid metabolic pathway is complicated by the lipophilic nature of the substrates.

The functional enzyme is a heterodimer of SPT1 (LCB1) with either SPT2 (LCB2) or SPT3 (LCB2B); the small subunits of SPT (ssSPTa or ssSPTb) bind to the heterodimer to enhance enzymatic activity. The complexes of SPT1/SPT2/ssSPTa and SPT1/SPT2/ssSPTb were most active with palmitoylCoA as substrate, with the latter complex also showing some activity with stearoylCoA [202]. Complexes involving SPT3 appeared more broad in substrate selectivity, with incorporation of myristoylCoA prominent for SPT1/SPT3/ssSPTa complexes, while SP1/SPT3/ssSPTb complexes had similar activity with C16, C18 and C20 acylCoAs [202].

This family of enzymes, also known as sphingosine N‐acyltransferase, is located in the ER facing the cytosol with an as‐yet undefined topology and stoichiometry. Ceramide synthase in vitro is sensitive to inhibition by the fungal derived toxin, fumonisin B1.

DEGS1 and DEGS2 are 4TM proteins.

Comments

DEGS1 activity is inhibited by a number of natural products, including curcumin and Δ9‐tetrahydrocannabinol[138].

Overview

Following translocation from the ER to the Golgi under the influence of the ceramide transfer protein, sphingomyelin synthases allow the formation of sphingomyelin by the transfer of phosphocholine from the phospholipid phosphatidylcholine.

Sphingomyelin synthase‐related protein 1 is structurally related but lacks sphingomyelin synthase activity.

Also known as sphingomyelinase.

Protein FAN [3] and polycomb protein EED [410] allow coupling between TNF receptors and neutral sphingomyelinase phosphodiesterases.

The six human ceramidases may be divided on the basis of pH optimae into acid, neutral and alkaline ceramidases, which also differ in their subcellular location.

The six human ceramidases may be divided on the basis of pH optimae into acid, neutral and alkaline ceramidases, which also differ in their subcellular location.

Comments

ASAH2B appears to be an enzymatically inactive protein, which may result from gene duplication and truncation.

Overview

The six human ceramidases may be divided on the basis of pH optimae into acid, neutral and alkaline ceramidases, which also differ in their subcellular location.

Comments

A ceramide kinase‐like protein has been identified in the human genome (CERKL, Q49MI3).

Further reading on Ceramide turnover

Aburasayn H et al. (2016) Targeting ceramide metabolism in obesity. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 311: E423‐35 [PMID:27382035]

Adada M et al. (2016) Inhibitors of the sphingomyelin cycle: Sphingomyelin synthases and sphingomyelinases. Chem Phys Lipids 197: 45‐59 [PMID:26200918]

Casals N et al. (2016) Carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1C: From cognition to cancer. Prog Lipid Res 61: 134‐48 [PMID:26708865]

Casasampere M et al. (2016) Inhibitors of dihydroceramide desaturase 1: Therapeutic agents and pharmacological tools to decipher the role of dihydroceramides in cell biology. Chem Phys Lipids 197: 33‐44 [PMID:26248324]

Fucho R et al. (2017) Ceramides and mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation in obesity. FASEB J 31: 1263‐1272 [PMID:28003342]

Hernandez‐Corbacho MJ et al. (2017) Sphingolipids in mitochondria. Biochim Biophys Acta 1862: 56‐68 [PMID:27697478]

Ilan Y. (2016) Compounds of the sphingomyelin‐ceramide‐glycosphingolipid pathways as secondary messenger molecules: new targets for novel therapies for fatty liver disease and insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 310: G1102‐17 [PMID:27173510]

Iqbal J et al. (2017) Sphingolipids and Lipoproteins in Health and Metabolic Disorders. Trends Endocrinol Metab 28: 506‐518 [PMID:28462811]

Kihara A. (2016) Synthesis and degradation pathways, functions, and pathology of ceramides and epidermal acylceramides. Prog Lipid Res 63: 50‐69 [PMID:27107674]

Petrache I et al. (2016) Ceramide Signaling and Metabolism in Pathophysiological States of the Lung. Annu Rev Physiol 78: 463‐80 [PMID:26667073]

Rodriguez‐Cuenca S et al. (2017) Sphingolipids and glycerophospholipids ‐ The “ying and yang” of lipotoxicity in metabolic diseases. Prog Lipid Res 66: 14‐29 [PMID:28104532]

Sasset L et al. (2016) Sphingolipid De Novo Biosynthesis: A Rheostat of Cardiovascular Homeostasis. Trends Endocrinol Metab 27: 807‐819 [PMID:27562337]

Vogt D et al. (2017) Therapeutic Strategies and Pharmacological Tools Influencing S1P Signaling and Metabolism. Med Res Rev 37: 3‐51 [PMID:27480072]

Wegner MS et al. (2016) The enigma of ceramide synthase regulation in mammalian cells. Prog Lipid Res 63: 93‐119 [PMID:27180613]

Overview

Chromatin modifying enzymes, and other chromatin‐modifying proteins, fall into three broad categories: writers, readers and erasers. The function of these proteins is to dynamically maintain cell identity and regulate processes such as differentiation, development, proliferation and genome integrity via recognition of specific 'marks' (covalent post‐translational modifications) on histone proteins and DNA [280]. In normal cells, tissues and organs, precise co‐ordination of these proteins ensures expression of only those genes required to specify phenotype or which are required at specific times, for specific functions. Chromatin modifications allow DNA modifications not coded by the DNA sequence to be passed on through the genome and underlies heritable phenomena such as X chromosome inactivation, aging, heterochromatin formation, reprogramming, and gene silencing (epigenetic control).

To date at least eight distinct types of modifications are found on histones. These include small covalent modifications such as acetylation, methylation, and phosphorylation, the attachment of larger modifiers such as ubiquitination or sumoylation, and ADP ribosylation, proline isomerization and deimination. Chromatin modifications and the functions they regulate in cells are reviewed by Kouzarides (2007) [280].

Writer proteins include the histone methyltransferases, histone acetyltransferases, some kinases and ubiquitin ligases.

Readers include proteins which contain methyl‐lysine‐recognition motifs such as bromodomains, chromodomains, tudor domains, PHD zinc fingers, PWWP domains and MBT domains.

Erasers include the histone demethylases and histone deacetylases (HDACs and sirtuins).

Dysregulated epigenetic control can be associated with human diseases such as cancer [137], where a wide variety of cellular and protein abberations are known to perturb chromatin structure, gene transcription and ultimately cellular pathways [27, 477]. Due to the reversible nature of epigenetic modifications, chromatin regulators are very tractable targets for drug discovery and the development of novel therapeutics. Indeed, small molecule inhibitors of writers (e.g. azacitidine and decitabine target the DNA methyltransferases DNMT1 and DNMT3 for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes [175, 565]) and erasers (e.g. the HDAC inhibitors vorinostat, romidepsin and belinostat for the treatment of T‐cell lymphomas [153, 265]) are already being used in the clinic. The search for the next generation of compounds with improved specificity against chromatin‐associated proteins is an area of intense basic and clinical research [61]. Current progress in this field is reviewed by Simó‐Riudalbas and Esteller (2015) [478].

Protein arginine N‐methyltransferases (PRMT, EC 2.1.1.‐) encompass histone arginine N‐methyltransferases (PRMT4, PRMT7, EC 2.1.1.125) and myelin basic protein N‐methyltransferases (PRMT7, EC 2.1.1.126). They are dimeric or tetrameric enzymes which use S‐adenosyl methionine as a methyl donor, generating S‐adenosylhomocysteine as a by‐product. They generate both mono‐methylated and di‐methylated products; these may be symmetric (SDMA) or asymmetric (NG,NG‐dimethyl‐L‐arginine) versions, where both guanidine nitrogens are monomethylated or one of the two is dimethylated, respectively.

Information on members of this family may be found in the online database.

Histone deacetylases act as erasers of epigenetic acetylation marks on lysine residues in histones. Removal of the acetyl groups facilitates tighter packing of chromatin (heterochromatin formation) leading to transcriptional repression.

The histone deacetylase family has been classified in to five subfamilies based on phylogenetic comparison with yeast homologues:

Class I contains HDACs 1, 2, 3 and 8

Class IIa contains HDACs 4, 5, 7 and 9

Class IIb contains HDACs 6 and 10

Class III contains the sirtuins (SIRT1‐7)

Class IV contains only HDAC11.

Classes I, II and IV use Zn+ as a co‐factor, whereas catalysis by Class III enzymes requires NAD+ as a co‐factor, and members of this subfamily have ADP‐ribosylase activity in addition to protein deacetylase function [456].

HDACs have more general protein deacetylase activity, being able to deacetylate lysine residues in non‐histone proteins [90] such as microtubules [233], the hsp90 chaperone [281] and the tumour suppressor p53 [322].

Dysregulated HDAC activity has been identified in cancer cells and tumour tissues [305, 444], making HDACs attractive molecular targets in the search for novel mechanisms to treat cancer [567]. Several small molecule HDAC inhibitors are already approved for clinical use: romidepsin, belinostat, vorinostat, panobinostat, belinostat, valproic acid and tucidinostat. HDACs and HDAC inhibitors currently in development as potential anti‐cancer therapeutics are reviewed by Simó‐Riudalbas and Esteller (2015) [478].

Information on members of this family may be found in the online database.

Cyclic nucleotides are second messengers generated by cyclase enzymes from precursor triphosphates and hydrolysed by phosphodiesterases. The cellular actions of these cyclic nucleotides are mediated through activation of protein kinases (cAMP‐ and cGMP‐dependent protein kinases), ion channels (cyclic nucleotide‐gated, CNG, and hyperpolarization and cyclic nucleotide‐gated, HCN) and guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs, Epac).

Adenylyl cyclase, E.C. 4.6.1.1, converts ATP to cyclic AMP and pyrophosphate. Mammalian membrane‐bound adenylyl cyclases are typically made up of two clusters of six TM domains separating two intracellular, overlapping catalytic domains that are the target for the nonselective activators forskolin, NKH477(except AC9, [419]) and Gα s(the stimulatory G protein α subunit). Adenosine and its derivatives (e.g. 2',5'‐dideoxyadenosine), acting through the P‐site, appear to be physiological inhibitors of adenylyl cyclase activity [527]. Three families of adenylyl cyclase are distinguishable: calmodulin(CALM1 CALM2 CALM3, P62158)‐stimulated (AC1, AC3 and AC8), Ca2+‐inhibitable (AC5, AC6 and AC9) and Ca2+‐insensitive (AC2, AC4 and AC7) forms.

Comments

Nitric oxide has been proposed to inhibit AC5 and AC6 selectively [223], although it is unclear whether this phenomenon is of physiological significance. A soluble adenylyl cyclase has been described (ADCY10, Q96PN6 [54]), unaffected by either Gα or Gβ γ subunits, which has been suggested to be a cytoplasmic bicarbonate (pH‐insensitive) sensor [82]. It can be inhibited selectively by KH7 (pIC50 5.0‐5.5) [221].

Further reading on Adenylyl cyclases

Dessauer CW et al. (2017) International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CI. Structures and Small Molecule Modulators of Mammalian Adenylyl Cyclases. Pharmacol Rev 69: 93‐139 [PMID:28255005]

Halls ML et al. (2017) Adenylyl cyclase signalling complexes ‐ Pharmacological challenges and opportunities. Pharmacol Ther 172: 171‐180 [PMID:28132906]

Wu L et al. (2016) Adenylate cyclase 3: a new target for anti‐obesity drug development. Obes Rev 17: 907‐14 [PMID:27256589]

Overview

Epacs are members of a family of guanine nucleotide exchange factors (ENSFM00250000000899), which also includes RapGEF5(GFR, KIAA0277, MR‐GEF, Q92565) and RapGEFL1 (Link‐GEFII, Q9UHV5). They are activated endogenously by cyclic AMP and with some pharmacological selectivity by 8‐pCPT‐2'‐O‐Me‐cAMP[134]. Once activated, Epacs induce an enhanced activity of the monomeric G proteins, Rap1 and Rap2 by facilitating binding of guanosine‐5'‐triphosphate in place of guanosine 5'‐diphosphate, leading to activation of phospholipase C [459].

Further reading on Exchange protein activated by cyclic AMP (EPAC)

Fujita T et al. (2017) The role of Epac in the heart. Cell Mol Life Sci 74: 591‐606 [PMID:27549789]

Parnell E et al. (2015) The future of EPAC‐targeted therapies: agonism versus antagonism. Trends Pharmacol Sci 36: 203‐14 [PMID:25744542]

Wang P et al. (2017) Exchange proteins directly activated by cAMP (EPACs): Emerging therapeutic targets. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 27: 1633‐1639 [PMID:28283242]

Overview

Nitric oxide (NO)‐sensitive (soluble) guanylyl cyclase (GTP diphosphate‐lyase (cyclising)), E.C. 4.6.1.2, is a heterodimer comprising a β 1 subunit and one of two alpha subunits (α 1, α 2) giving rise to two functionally indistinguishable isoforms, GC‐1 (α 1 β 1) and GC‐2 (α 2 β 1) [449, 593]. A haem group is associated with the β subunit and is the target for the endogenous ligand NO, and, potentially, carbon monoxide [159]. The enzyme converts guanosine‐5'‐triphosphate to the intracellular second messenger cyclic guanosine‐3',5'‐monophosphate (cyclic GMP).

Comments

ODQ also shows activity at other haem‐containing proteins [142], while YC‐1 may also inhibit cGMP‐hydrolysing phosphodiesterases [158, 169].

Further reading on Nitric oxide (NO)‐sensitive (soluble) guanylyl cyclase

Papapetropoulos A et al. (2015) Extending the translational potential of targeting NO/cGMP‐regulated pathways in the CVS. Br J Pharmacol 172: 1397‐414 [PMID:25302549]

Pechanova O et al. (2015) Cardiac NO signalling in the metabolic syndrome. Br J Pharmacol 172: 1415‐33 [PMID:25297560]

Vanhoutte PM et al. (2016) Thirty Years of Saying NO: Sources, Fate, Actions, and Misfortunes of the Endothelium‐Derived Vasodilator Mediator. Circ Res 119: 375‐96 [PMID:27390338]

Yetik‐Anacak G et al. (2015) Gas what: NO is not the only answer to sexual function. Br J Pharmacol 172: 1434‐54 [PMID:24661203]

Overview

3',5'‐Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases (PDEs, 3',5'‐cyclic‐nucleotide 5'‐nucleotidohydrolase), E.C. 3.1.4.17, catalyse the hydrolysis of a 3',5'‐cyclic nucleotide (usually cyclic AMP or cyclic GMP). Isobutylmethylxanthine is a nonselective inhibitor with an IC50 value in the millimolar range for all isoforms except PDE 8A, 8B and 9A. A 2',3'‐cyclic nucleotide 3'‐phosphodiesterase (E.C. 3.1.4.37 CNPase) activity is associated with myelin formation in the development of the CNS.

Comments

PDE1A, 1B and 1C appear to act as soluble homodimers, while PDE2A is a membrane‐bound homodimer. PDE3A and PDE3B are membrane‐bound.

PDE4 isoforms are essentially cyclic AMP specific. The potency of YM976 at other members of the PDE4 family has not been reported. PDE4B–D long forms are inhibited by extracellular signal‐regulated kinase (ERK)‐mediated phosphorylation [224, 225]. PDE4A–D splice variants can be membrane‐bound or cytosolic [229]. PDE4 isoforms may be labelled with [3H]rolipram.

PDE6 is a membrane‐bound tetramer composed of two catalytic chains (PDE6A or PDE6C and PDE6B), an inhibitory chain (PDE6G or PDE6H) and the PDE6D chain. The enzyme is essentially cyclic GMP specific and is activated by the α‐subunit of transducin (Gα t) and inhibited by sildenafil, zaprinast and dipyridamole with potencies lower than those observed for PDE5A. Defects in PDE6B are a cause of retinitis pigmentosa and congenital stationary night blindness.

Further reading on Phosphodiesterases, 3',5'‐cyclic nucleotide (PDEs)

Das A et al. (2015) PDE5 inhibitors as therapeutics for heart disease, diabetes and cancer. Pharmacol Ther 147: 12‐21 [PMID:25444755]

Jorgensen C et al. (2015) Phosphodiesterase4D (PDE4D)–A risk factor for atrial fibrillation and stroke? J Neurol Sci 359: 266‐74 [PMID:26671126]

Klussmann E. (2016) Protein‐protein interactions of PDE4 family members ‐ Functions, interactions and therapeutic value. Cell Signal 28: 713‐8 [PMID:26498857]

Korkmaz‐Icoz S et al. (2017) Targeting phosphodiesterase 5 as a therapeutic option against myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury and for treating heart failure. Br J Pharmacol [PMID:28213937]

Leal LF et al. (2015) Phosphodiesterase 8B and cyclic AMP signaling in the adrenal cortex. Endocrine 50: 27‐31 [PMID:25971952]

Movsesian M. (2016) Novel approaches to targeting PDE3 in cardiovascular disease. Pharmacol Ther 163: 74‐81 [PMID:27108947]

Ricciarelli R et al. (2015) Phosphodiesterase 4D: an enzyme to remember. Br J Pharmacol 172: 4785‐9 [PMID:26211680]

Wu C et al. (2016) Phosphodiesterase‐4 inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for metabolic disorders. Obes Rev 17: 429‐41 [PMID:26997580]

Overview

The cytochrome P450 enzyme family (CYP450), E.C. 1.14.‐.‐, were originally defined by their strong absorbance at 450 nm due to the reduced carbon monoxide‐complexed haem component of the cytochromes. They are an extensive family of haem‐containing monooxygenases with a huge range of both endogenous and exogenous substrates. Listed below are the human enzymes; their relationship with rodent CYP450 enzyme activities is obscure in that the species orthologue may not mediate metabolism of the same substrates. Although the majority of CYP450 enzyme activities are concentrated in the liver, the extrahepatic enzyme activities also contribute to patho/physiological processes. Genetic variation of CYP450 isoforms is widespread and likely underlies a significant proportion of the individual variation to drug administration.

Comments

Converts lauric acid to 12‐hydroxylauric acid.

Further reading on Cytochrome P450

Backman JT et al. (2016) Role of Cytochrome P450 2C8 in Drug Metabolism and Interactions. Pharmacol Rev 68: 168‐241 [PMID:26721703]

Davis CM et al. (2017) Cytochrome P450 eicosanoids in cerebrovascular function and disease. Pharmacol Ther [PMID:28527918]

Ghosh D et al. (2016) Recent Progress in the Discovery of Next Generation Inhibitors of Aromatase from the Structure‐Function Perspective. J Med Chem 59: 5131‐48 [PMID:26689671]

Go RE et al. (2015) Cytochrome P450 1 family and cancers. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 147: 24‐30 [PMID:25448748]

Guengerich FP et al. (2016) Recent Structural Insights into Cytochrome P450 Function. Trends Pharmacol Sci 37: 625‐40 [PMID:27267697]

Isvoran A et al. (2017) Pharmacogenomics of the cytochrome P450 2C family: impacts of amino acid variations on drug metabolism. Drug Discov Today 22: 366‐376 [PMID:27693711]

Jamieson KL et al. (2017) Cytochrome P450‐derived eicosanoids and heart function. Pharmacol Ther [PMID:28551025]

Mak PJ et al. (2017) Spectroscopic studies of the cytochrome P450 reaction mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta [PMID:28668640]

Moutinho M et al. (2016) Cholesterol 24‐hydroxylase: Brain cholesterol metabolism and beyond. Biochim Biophys Acta 1861 1911‐1920 [PMID:27663182]

Shalan H et al. (2017) Keeping the spotlight on cytochrome P450. Biochim Biophys Acta [PMID:28599858]

Overview

The principle endocannabinoids are 2‐acylglycerol esters, such as 2‐arachidonoylglycerol (2AG), and N‐acylethanolamines, such as anandamide(N‐arachidonoylethanolamine, AEA). The glycerol esters and ethanolamides are synthesised and hydrolysed by parallel, independent pathways. Mechanisms for release and re‐uptake of endocannabinoids (and related entities) are unclear, although candidates for intracellular transport have been suggested. For the generation of 2‐arachidonoylglycerol, the key enzyme involved is diacylglycerol lipase (DGL), whilst several routes for anandamide synthesis have been described, the best characterized of which involves N‐acylphosphatidylethanolamine‐phospholipase D (NAPE‐PLD, [476]). A transacylation enzyme which forms N‐acylphosphatidylethanolamines has recently been identified as a cytosolic enzyme, PLA2G4E(Q3MJ16) [383]. In vitro experiments indicate that the endocannabinoids are also substrates for oxidative metabolism via cyclooxygenase, lipoxygenase and cytochrome P450 enzyme activities [11, 154, 488].

Comments

Routes for N‐acylethanolamine biosynthesis other than through NAPE‐PLD activity have been identified [536].

2‐Acylglycerol ester turnover

Comments on Endocannabinoid turnover: Many of the compounds described as inhibitors are irreversible and so potency estimates will vary with incubation time. FAAH2 is not found in rodents [563] and a few of the inhibitors described have been assessed at this enzyme activity. 2‐arachidonoylglycerol has been reported to be hydrolysed by multiple enzyme activities from neural preparations, including ABHD2(P08910) [356], ABHD12(Q8N2K0) [44], neuropathy target esterase (PNPLA6, Q8IY17 [338]) and carboxylesterase 1 (CES1, P23141 [581]). ABHD2(P08910) has also been described as a triacylglycerol lipase and ester hydrolase [329], while ABHD12(Q8N2K0) is also able to hydrolyse lysophosphatidylserine [531]. ABHD12(Q8N2K0) has been described to be inhibited selectively by triterpenoids, such as betulinic acid [401].

Further reading on Endocannabinoid turnover

Blankman JL et al. (2013) Chemical probes of endocannabinoid metabolism. Pharmacol. Rev. 65: 849‐71 [PMID:23512546]

Janssen FJ et al. (2016) Inhibitors of diacylglycerol lipases in neurodegenerative and metabolic disorders. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 26: 3831‐7 [PMID:27394666]

Ueda N et al. (2013) Metabolism of endocannabinoids and related N‐acylethanolamines: canonical and alternative pathways. FEBS J. 280: 1874‐94 [PMID:23425575]

Wellner N et al. (2013) N‐acylation of phosphatidylethanolamine and its biological functions in mammals. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1831: 652‐62 [PMID:23000428]

Overview

Eicosanoids are 20‐carbon fatty acids, where the usual focus is the polyunsaturated analogue arachidonic acid and its metabolites. Arachidonic acid is thought primarily to derive from phospholipase A2 action on membrane phosphatidylcholine, and may be re‐cycled to form phospholipid through conjugation with coenzyme A and subsequently glycerol derivatives. Oxidative metabolism of arachidonic acid is conducted through three major enzymatic routes: cyclooxygenases; lipoxygenases and cytochrome P450‐like epoxygenases, particularly CYP2J2. Isoprostanes are structural analogues of the prostanoids (hence the nomenclature D‐, E‐, F‐isoprostanes and isothromboxanes), which are produced in the presence of elevated free radicals in a non‐enzymatic manner, leading to suggestions for their use as biomarkers of oxidative stress. Molecular targets for their action have yet to be defined.

Prostaglandin (PG) G/H synthase, most commonly referred to as cyclooxygenase (COX, (5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z)‐icosa‐5,8,11,14‐tetraenoate,hydrogen‐donor: oxygen oxidoreductase) activity, catalyses the formation of PGG2 from arachidonic acid. Hydroperoxidase activity inherent in the enzyme catalyses the formation of PGH2 from PGG2. COX‐1 and ‐2 can be nonselectively inhibited by ibuprofen, ketoprofen, naproxen, indomethacin and paracetamol (acetaminophen). PGH2 may then be metabolised to prostaglandins and thromboxanes by various prostaglandin synthases in an apparently tissue‐dependent manner.

Subsequent to the formation of PGH2, the cytochrome P450 activities thromboxane synthase (CYP5A1, TBXAS1, P24557, EC 5.3.99.5) and prostacyclin synthase (CYP8A1, PTGIS, Q16647, EC 5.3.99.4) generate thromboxane A2 and prostacyclin (PGI2), respectively (see Cytochrome P450s). Additionally, multiple enzyme activities are able to generate prostaglandin E2(PGE2), prostaglandin D2(PGD2) and prostaglandin F2α(PGF2α). PGD2 can be metabolised to 9α,11β‐prostacyclin F2α through the multifunctional enzyme activity of AKR1C3. PGE2 can be metabolised to 9α,11β‐prostaglandin F2α through the 9‐ketoreductase activity of CBR1. Conversion of the 15‐hydroxyecosanoids, including prostaglandins, lipoxins and leukotrienes to their keto derivatives by the NAD‐dependent enzyme HPGD leads to a reduction in their biological activity.

Comments

YS121 has been reported to inhibit mPGES1 and 5‐LOX with a pIC50value of 5.5 [276].

Overview

The lipoxygenases (LOXs) are a structurally related family of non‐heme iron dioxygenases that function in the production, and in some cases metabolism, of fatty acid hydroperoxides. For arachidonic acid as substrate, these products are hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acids (HPETEs). In humans there are five lipoxygenases, the 5S‐(arachidonate: oxygen 5‐oxidoreductase), 12R‐(arachidonate 12‐lipoxygenase, 12R‐type), 12S‐(arachidonate: oxygen 12‐oxidoreductase), and two distinct 15S‐(arachidonate: oxygen 15‐oxidoreductase) LOXs that oxygenate arachidonic acid in different positions along the carbon chain and form the corresponding 5S‐, 12S‐, 12R‐, or 15S‐hydroperoxides, respectively.

Comments

An 8‐LOX (EC 1.13.11.40, arachidonate:oxygen 8‐oxidoreductase) may be the mouse orthologue of 15‐LOX‐2 [167]. Some general LOX inhibitors are nordihydroguiaretic acid and esculetin. Zileuton and caffeic acid are used as 5‐lipoxygenase inhibitors, while baicalein and CDC are 12‐lipoxygenase inhibitors. The specificity of these inhibitors has not been rigorously assessed with all LOX forms: baicalein, along with other flavonoids, such as fisetin and luteolin, also inhibits 15‐LOX‐1 [450].

Overview

Leukotriene A4(LTA4), produced by 5‐LOX activity, and lipoxins may be subject to further oxidative metabolism; ω‐hydroxylation is mediated by CYP4F2 and CYP4F3, while β‐oxidation in mitochondria and peroxisomes proceeds in a manner dependent on coenzyme A conjugation. Conjugation of LTA4 at the 6 position with reduced glutathione to generate LTC4 occurs under the influence of leukotriene C4 synthase, with the subsequent formation of LTD4 and LTE4, all three of which are agonists at CysLT receptors. LTD4 formation is catalysed by γ‐glutamyltransferase, and subsequently dipeptidase 2 removes the terminal glycine from LTD4 to generate LTE4. Leukotriene A4 hydrolase converts the 5,6‐epoxide LTA4 to the 5‐hydroxylated LTB4, an agonist for BLT receptors. LTA4 is also acted upon by 12S‐LOX to produce the trihydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids lipoxins LXA4 and LXB4. Treatment with a LTA4 hydrolase inhibitor in a murine model of allergic airway inflammation increased LXA4 levels, in addition to reducing LTB4, in lung lavage fluid [429].

LTA4 hydrolase is also involved in biosynthesis of resolvin Es. Aspirin has been reported to increase endogenous formation of 18S‐hydroxyeicosapentaenoate (18S‐HEPE) compared with 18R‐HEPE, a resolvin precursor. Both enantiomers may be metabolised by human recombinant 5‐LOX; recombinant LTA4hydrolase converted chiral 5S(6)‐epoxide‐containing intermediates to resolvin E1 and 18S‐resolvin E1 [384].

Comments

LTA4H is a member of a family of arginyl aminopeptidases (ENSFM00250000001675), which also includes aminopeptidase B (RNPEP, 9H4A4) and aminopeptidase B‐like 1 (RNPEPL1, Q9HAU8). Dipeptidase 1 and 2 are members of a family of membrane dipeptidases, which also includes (DPEP3, Q9H4B8) for which LTD4 appears not to be a substrate.

Further reading on Eicosanoid turnover

Ackermann JA et al. (2017) The double‐edged role of 12/15‐lipoxygenase during inflammation and immunity Biochim Biophys Acta 1862: 371‐381 [PMID:27480217]

Grosser T et al. (2017) The Cardiovascular Pharmacology of Nonsteroidal Anti‐Inflammatory Drugs. Trends Pharmacol Sci [PMID:28651847]

Horn T et al. (2015) Evolutionary aspects of lipoxygenases and genetic diversity of human leukotriene signaling. Prog Lipid Res 57: 13‐39 [PMID:25435097]

Joshi YB et al. (2015) The 12/15‐lipoxygenase as an emerging therapeutic target for Alzheimer's disease. Trends Pharmacol Sci 36: 181‐6 [PMID:25708815]

Koeberle A et al. (2015) Perspective of microsomal prostaglandin E2 synthase‐1 as drug target in inflammation‐related disorders. Biochem Pharmacol 98: 1‐15 [PMID:26123522]

Kuhn H et al. (2015) Mammalian lipoxygenases and their biological relevance. Biochim Biophys Acta 1851: 308‐30 [PMID:25316652]

Patrignani P et al. (2015) Cyclooxygenase inhibitors: From pharmacology to clinical read‐outs. Biochim Biophys Acta 1851: 422‐32 [PMID:25263946]

Radmark O et al. (2015) 5‐Lipoxygenase, a key enzyme for leukotriene biosynthesis in health and disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 1851: 331‐9 [PMID:25152163]

Sasaki Y et al. (2017) Role of prostacyclin synthase in carcinogenesis. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat [PMID:28506876]

Seo MJ et al. (2017) Prostaglandin synthases: Molecular characterization and involvement in prostaglandin biosynthesis. Prog Lipid Res 66: 50‐68 [PMID:28392405]

Vitale P et al. (2016) COX‐1 Inhibitors: Beyond Structure Toward Therapy. Med Res Rev 36: 641‐71 [PMID:27111555]

Overview

The inhibitory neurotransmitter γ‐aminobutyrate (GABA, 4‐aminobutyrate) is generated in neurones by glutamic acid decarboxylase. GAD1 and GAD2 are differentially expressed during development, where GAD2 is thought to subserve a trophic role in early life and is distributed throughout the cytoplasm. GAD1 is expressed in later life and is more associated with nerve terminals [136] where GABA is principally accumulated in vesicles through the action of the vesicular inhibitory amino acid transporter SLC32A1. The role of γ‐aminobutyraldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH9A1) in neurotransmitter GABA synthesis is less clear. Following release from neurons, GABA may interact with either GABAA or GABAB receptors and may be accumulated in neurones and glia through the action of members of the SLC6 family of transporters. Successive metabolism through GABA transaminase and succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase generates succinic acid, which may be further metabolized in the mitochondria in the tricarboxylic acid cycle.

Further reading on GABA turnover

Koenig MK et al. (2017) Phenotype of GABA‐transaminase deficiency. Neurology 88: 1919‐1924 [PMID:28411234]

Lee H et al. (2015) Ornithine aminotransferase versus GABA aminotransferase: implications for the design of new anticancer drugs. Med Res Rev 35: 286‐305 [PMID:25145640]

McQuail JA et al. (2015) Molecular aspects of age‐related cognitive decline: the role of GABA signaling. Trends Mol Med 21: 450‐60 [PMID:26070271]

Overview

Phospholipids are the basic barrier components of membranes in eukaryotic cells divided into glycerophospholipids (phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol and its phosphorylated derivatives) and sphingolipids (ceramide phosphorylcholine and ceramide phosphorylethanolamine).

Phosphoinositide‐specific phospholipase C (PLC, EC 3.1.4.11), catalyses the hydrolysis of PIP2 to IP3 and 1,2‐diacylglycerol, each of which have major second messenger functions. Two domains, X and Y, essential for catalytic activity, are conserved in the different forms of PLC. Isoforms of PLC‐β are activated primarily by G protein‐coupled receptors through members of the Gq/11 family of G proteins. The receptor‐mediated activation of PLC‐γ involves their phosphorylation by receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) in response to activation of a variety of growth factor receptors and immune system receptors. PLC‐ϵ1 may represent a point of convergence of signalling via both G protein‐coupled and catalytic receptors. Ca2+ ions are required for catalytic activity of PLC isoforms and have been suggested to be the major physiological form of regulation of PLC‐δ activity. PLC has been suggested to be activated non‐selectively by the small molecule m3M3FBS[23], although this mechanism of action has been questioned [284]. The aminosteroid U73122 has been described as an inhibitor of phosphoinositide‐specific PLC [485], although its selectivity among the isoforms is untested and it has been reported to occupy the H1 histamine receptor [235].

Comments

A series of PLC‐like proteins (PLCL1, Q15111; PLCL2, Q9UPR0 and PLCH1, Q4KWH8) form a family with PLCδ and PLCζ1 isoforms, but appear to lack catalytic activity.

PLC‐δ2 has been cloned from bovine sources [351].

Further reading on Phosphoinositide‐specific phospholipase C

Cocco L et al. (2015) Phosphoinositide‐specific phospholipase C in health and disease. J Lipid Res 56: 1853‐60 [PMID:25821234]

Cockcroft S et al. (2016) Topological organisation of the phosphatidylinositol 4,5‐bisphosphate‐phospholipase C resynthesis cycle: PITPs bridge the ER‐PM gap. Biochem J 473: 4289‐4310 [PMID:27888240]

Litosch I. (2015) Regulating G protein activity by lipase‐independent functions of phospholipase C. Life Sci 137: 116‐24 [PMID:26239437]

Nakamura Y et al. (2017) Regulation and physiological functions of mammalian phospholipase C. J Biochem 161: 315‐321 [PMID:28130414]

Swann K et al. (2016) The sperm phospholipase C‐zeta and Ca2+ signalling at fertilization in mammals. Biochem Soc Trans 44: 267‐72 [PMID:26862214]

Overview

Phospholipase A2(PLA2, EC 3.1.1.4) cleaves the sn‐2 fatty acid of phospholipids, primarily phosphatidylcholine, to generate lysophosphatidylcholine and arachidonic acid. Most commonly‐used inhibitors (e.g. bromoenol lactone, arachidonyl trifluoromethyl ketone or methyl arachidonyl fluorophosphonate) are either non‐selective within the family of phospholipase A2 enzymes or have activity against other eicosanoid‐metabolising enzymes.

Secreted or extracellular forms: sPLA2‐1B, sPLA2‐2A, sPLA2‐2D, sPLA2‐2E, sPLA2‐2F, sPLA2‐3, sPLA2‐10 and sPLA2‐12A

Cytosolic, calcium‐dependent forms: cPLA2‐4A, cPLA2‐4B, cPLA2‐4C, cPLA2‐4D, cPLA2‐4E and cPLA2‐4F

Other forms: PLA2‐G5, iPLA2‐G6, PLA2‐G7 and PAFAH2 (platelet‐activating factor acetylhydrolase 2)

Further reading on Phospholipase A2

Leslie CC. (2015) Cytosolic phospholipase A(2): physiological function and role in disease. J Lipid Res 56: 1386‐402 [PMID:25838312]

Ong WY et al. (2015) Synthetic and natural inhibitors of phospholipases A2: their importance for understanding and treatment of neurological disorders. ACS Chem Neurosci 6: 814‐31 [PMID:25891385]

Ramanadham S et al. (2015) Calcium‐independent phospholipases A2 and their roles in biological processes and diseases. J Lipid Res 56: 1643‐68 [PMID:26023050]

Comments

The sequence of PLA2‐2C suggests a lack of catalytic activity, while PLA2‐12B (GXIIB, GXIII sPLA2‐like) appears to be catalytically inactive [448]. A further fragment has been identified with sequence similarities to Group II PLA2 members. Otoconin 90 (OC90) shows sequence homology to PLA2‐G10.

A binding protein for secretory phospholipase A2 has been identified which shows modest selectivity for sPLA2‐1B over sPLA2‐2A, and also binds snake toxin phospholipase A2[13]. The binding protein appears to have clearance function for circulating secretory phospholipase A2, as well as signalling functions, and is a candidate antigen for idiopathic membraneous nephropathy [29].

PLA2‐G7 and PAFAH2 also express platelet‐activating factor acetylhydrolase activity (EC 3.1.1.47).

Overview

Phosphatidylcholine‐specific phospholipase D (PLD, EC 3.1.4.4) catalyses the formation of phosphatidic acid from phosphatidylcholine. In addition, the enzyme can make use of alcohols, such as butanol in a transphosphatidylation reaction [428].

Comments

A lysophospholipase D activity (ENPP2, Q13822, also known as ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 2, phosphodiesterase I, nucleotide pyrophosphatase 2, autotaxin) has been described, which not only catalyses the production of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) from lysophosphatidylcholine, but also cleaves ATP (see Goding et al., 2003 [185]). Additionally, an N‐acylethanolamine‐specific phospholipase D (NAPEPLD, Q6IQ20) has been characterized, which appears to have a role in the generation of endocannabinoids/endovanilloids, including anandamide[388]. This enzyme activity appears to be enhanced by polyamines in the physiological range [311] and fails to transphosphatidylate with alcohols [408].

Three further, less well‐characterised isoforms are PLD3 (PLD3, Q8IV08, other names Choline phosphatase 3, HindIII K4L homolog, Hu‐K4), PLD4 (PLD4, Q96BZ4, other names Choline phosphatase 4, Phosphatidylcholine‐hydrolyzing phospholipase, D4C14orf175 UNQ2488/PRO5775) and PLD5 (PLD5, Q8N7P1). PLD3 has been reported to be involved in myogenesis [391]. PLD4 is described not to have phospholipase D catalytic activity [588], but has been associated with inflammatory disorders [386, 507, 526]. Sequence analysis suggests that PLD5 is catalytically inactive.

Further reading on Phospholipase D

Brown HA et al. (2017) Targeting phospholipase D in cancer, infection and neurodegenerative disorders. Nat Rev Drug Discov 16: 351‐367 [PMID:28209987]

Frohman MA. (2015) The phospholipase D superfamily as therapeutic targets. Trends Pharmacol Sci 36: 137‐44 [PMID:25661257]

Nelson RK et al. (2015) Physiological and pathophysiological roles for phospholipase D. J Lipid Res 56: 2229‐37 [PMID:25926691]

Overview

Lipid phosphate phosphatases, divided into phosphatidic acid phosphatases or lipins catalyse the dephosphorylation of phosphatidic acid (and other phosphorylated lipid derivatives) to generate inorganic phosphate and diacylglycerol. PTEN, a phosphatase and tensin homolog (BZS, MHAM, MMAC1, PTEN1, TEP1) is a phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5‐trisphosphate 3‐phosphatase which acts as a tumour suppressor by reducing cellular levels of PI 3,4,5‐P, thereby toning down activity of PDK1 and PKB. Loss‐of‐function mutations are frequently identified as somatic mutations in cancers.

Phosphatidylinositol may be phosphorylated at either 3‐ or 4‐ positions on the inositol ring by PI 3‐kinases or PI 4‐kinases, respectively.

Phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinases

Phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinases (PI3K, provisional nomenclature) catalyse the introduction of a phosphate into the 3‐position of phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylinositol 4‐phosphate (PIP) or phosphatidylinositol 4,5‐bisphosphate (PIP2). There is evidence that PI3K can also phosphorylate serine/threonine residues on proteins. In addition to the classes described below, further serine/threonine protein kinases, including ATM (Q13315) and mTOR(P42345), have been described to phosphorylate phosphatidylinositol and have been termed PI3K‐related kinases. Structurally, PI3Ks have common motifs of at least one C2, calcium‐binding domain and helical domains, alongside structurally‐conserved catalytic domains. Wortmannin and LY 294002 are widely‐used inhibitors of PI3K activities. Wortmannin is irreversible and shows modest selectivity between Class I and Class II PI3K, while LY294002 is reversible and selective for Class I compared to Class II PI3K.

Class I PI3Ks (EC 2.7.1.153) phosphorylate phosphatidylinositol 4,5‐bisphosphate to generate phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5‐trisphosphate and are heterodimeric, matching catalytic and regulatory subunits. Class IA PI3Ks include p110α, p110β and p110δ catalytic subunits, with predominantly p85 and p55 regulatory subunits. The single catalytic subunit that forms Class IB PI3K is p110γ. Class IA PI3Ks are more associated with receptor tyrosine kinase pathways, while the Class IB PI3K is linked more with GPCR signalling.

Class II PI3Ks (EC 2.7.1.154) phosphorylate phosphatidylinositol to generate phosphatidylinositol 3‐phosphate (and possibly phosphatidylinositol 4‐phosphate to generate phosphatidylinositol 3,4‐bisphosphate). Three monomeric members exist, PI3K‐C2α, β and β, and include Ras‐binding, Phox homology and two C2domains.

The only class III PI3K isoform (EC 2.7.1.137) is a heterodimer formed of a catalytic subunit (VPS34) and regulatory subunit (VPS15).

Phosphatidylinositol 4‐kinases

Phosphatidylinositol 4‐kinases (EC 2.7.1.67) generate phosphatidylinositol 4‐phosphate and may be divided into higher molecular weight type III and lower molecular weight type II forms.

Overview

PIP2 is generated by phosphorylation of PI 4‐phosphate or PI 5‐phosphate by type I PI 4‐phosphate 5‐kinases or type II PI 5‐phosphate 4‐kinases.

Type I PIP kinases are required for the production of the second messenger phosphatidylinositol 4,5‐bisphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P2) by phosphorylating PtdIns(4)P [426]. This enzyme family is also known as type I PIP(5)Ks.

Type II PIP kinases are essential for the production of the second messenger phosphatidylinositol 4,5‐bisphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P2) by phosphorylating PtdIns(5)P [426]. This enzyme family is also known as type II PIP(5)Ks.

Further reading on Phosphatidylinositol kinases

Bauer TM et al. (2015) Targeting PI3 kinase in cancer. Pharmacol Ther 146: 53‐60 [PMID:25240910]

Mayer IA et al. (2016) The PI3K/AKT Pathway as a Target for Cancer Treatment. Annu Rev Med 67: 11‐28 [PMID:26473415]

Singh P et al. (2016) p110alpha and p110beta isoforms of PI3K signaling: are they two sides of the same coin? FEBS Lett 590: 3071‐82 [PMID:27552098]

Zhu J et al. (2015) Discovery of selective phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase inhibitors to treat hematological malignancies. Drug Discov Today 20: 988‐94 [PMID:25857437]

Further reading on Glycerophospholipid turnover

Cauvin C et al. (2015) Phosphoinositides: Lipids with informative heads and mastermind functions in cell division. Biochim Biophys Acta 1851: 832‐43 [PMID:25449648]

Irvine RF. (2016) A short history of inositol lipids. J Lipid Res 57: 1987‐1994 [PMID:27623846]

Poli A et al. (2016) Nuclear Phosphatidylinositol Signaling: Focus on Phosphatidylinositol Phosphate Kinases and Phospholipases C. J Cell Physiol 231: 1645‐55 [PMID:26626942]

Overview

Haem oxygenase (heme,hydrogen‐donor:oxygen oxidoreductase (α‐methene‐oxidizing, hydroxylating)), E.C. 1.14.99.3, converts heme into biliverdin and carbon monoxide, utilizing NADPH as cofactor.

Comments

The existence of a third non‐catalytic version of haem oxygenase, HO3, has been proposed, although this has been suggested to be a pseudogene [215]. The chemical tin protoporphyrin IX acts as a haem oxygenase inhibitor in rat liver with an IC50 value of 11 nM [128].

Further reading on Haem oxygenase

Abraham NG et al. (2016) Translational Significance of Heme Oxygenase in Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome. Trends Pharmacol Sci 37: 17‐36 [PMID:26515032]

Naito Y et al. (2014) Heme oxygenase‐1 and anti‐inflammatory M2 macrophages. Arch Biochem Biophys 564: 83‐8 [PMID:25241054]

Otterbein LE et al. (2016) Heme Oxygenase‐1 and Carbon Monoxide in the Heart: The Balancing Act Between Danger Signaling and Pro‐Survival. Circ Res 118: 1940‐59 [PMID:27283533]

Poulos TL. (2014) Heme enzyme structure and function. Chem. Rev. 114: 3919‐62 [PMID:24400737]

Overview

Hydrogen sulfide is a gasotransmitter, with similarities to nitric oxide and carbon monoxide. Although the enzymes indicated below have multiple enzymatic activities, the focus here is the generation of hydrogen sulphide (H2S) and the enzymatic characteristics are described accordingly. Cystathionine β‐synthase (CBS) and cystathionine γ‐lyase (CSE) are pyridoxal phosphate (PLP)‐dependent enzymes. 3‐mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (3‐MPST) functions to generate H2S; only CAT is PLP‐dependent, while 3‐MPST is not. Thus, this third pathway is sometimes referred to as PLP‐independent. CBS and CSE are predominantly cytosolic enzymes, while 3‐MPST is found both in the cytosol and the mitochondria.

Further reading on Hydrogen sulphide synthesis

Asimakopoulou A et al. (2013) Selectivity of commonly used pharmacological inhibitors for cystathionine á synthase (CBS) and cystathionine g lyase (CSE). British Journal of Pharmacology 169: 922‐932 [PM:23488457]

Kanagy NL et al. (2017) Vascular biology of hydrogen sulfide. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 312: C537‐C549 [PMID:28148499]

Meng G et al. (2017) Protein S‐sulfhydration by hydrogen sulfide in cardiovascular system. Br J Pharmacol [PMID:28148499]

Wallace JL et al. (2015) Hydrogen sulfide‐based therapeutics: exploiting a unique but ubiquitous gasotransmitter. Nat Rev Drug Discov 14: 329‐45 [PMID:28148499]

Overview

Listed in this section are hydrolases not accumulated in other parts of the Concise Guide, such as monoacylglycerol lipase and acetylcholinesterase. Pancreatic lipase is the predominant mechanism of fat digestion in the alimentary system; its inhibition is associated with decreased fat absorption. CES1 is present at lower levels in the gut than CES2 (P23141), but predominates in the liver, where it is responsible for the hydrolysis of many aliphatic, aromatic and steroid esters. Hormone‐sensitive lipase is also a relatively non‐selective esterase associated with steroid ester hydrolysis and triglyceride metabolism, particularly in adipose tissue. Endothelial lipase is secreted from endothelial cells and regulates circulating cholesterol in high density lipoproteins.

Further reading on Hydrolases

Markey GM. (2011) Carboxylesterase 1 (Ces1): from monocyte marker to major player. J. Clin. Pathol. 64: 107‐9 [PMID:21177752]

Takenaka MC et al. (2016) Regulation of the T Cell Response by CD39. Trends Immunol 37: 427‐39 [PMID:27236363]

Overview

The sugar alcohol D‐myo‐inositol is a component of the phosphatidylinositol signalling cycle, where the principal second messenger is inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate, IP3, which acts at intracellular ligand‐gated ion channels, IP3 receptors to elevate intracellular calcium. IP3 is recycled to inositol by phosphatases or phosphorylated to form other active inositol polyphosphates. Inositol produced from dephosphorylation of IP3 is recycled into membrane phospholipid under the influence of phosphatidyinositol synthase activity (CDP‐diacylglycerol‐inositol 3‐phosphatidyltransferase [EC 2.7.8.11]).

Inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate 3‐kinases (E.C. 2.7.1.127, ENSFM00250000001260) catalyse the generation of inositol 1,3,4,5‐tetrakisphosphate (IP4) from IP3. IP3 kinase activity is enhanced in the presence of calcium/calmodulin(CALM1 CALM2 CALM3, P62158) [98].

Information on members of this family may be found in the online database.

Members of this family exhibit phosphatase activity towards IP3, as well as towards other inositol derivatives, including the phospholipids PIP2 and PIP3. With IP3 as substrate, 1‐phosphatase (EC 3.1.3.57) generates 4,5,‐IP2, 4‐phosphatases (EC 3.1.3.66, ENSFM00250000001432) generate 1,5,‐IP2 and 5‐phosphatases (E.C. 3.1.3.36 or 3.1.3.56) generate 1,4,‐IP2.

Information on members of this family may be found in the online database.

Comments

In vitro analysis suggested IP3 and IP4 were poor substrates for SKIP, synaptojanin 1 and synaptojanin 2, but suggested that PIP2 and PIP3 were more efficiently hydrolysed [458].

Overview

Inositol monophosphatase (E.C. 3.1.3.25, IMPase, myo‐inositol‐1(or 4)‐phosphate phosphohydrolase) is a magnesium‐dependent homodimer which hydrolyses myo‐inositol monophosphate to generate myo‐inositol and phosphate. Glycerol may be a physiological phosphate acceptor. Li+ is a nonselective un‐competitive inhibitor more potent at IMPase 1 (pKica. 3.5, [347]; pIC50 3.2, [385]) than IMPase 2 (pIC50 1.8‐2.1, [385]). IMPase activity may be inhibited competitively by L690330(pKi 5.5, [347]), although the enzyme selectivity is not yet established.

Comments

Polymorphisms in either of the genes encoding these enzymes have been linked with bipolar disorder [481, 482, 589]. Disruption of the gene encoding IMPase 1, but not IMPase 2, appears to mimic the effects of Li+ in mice [104, 105].

Further reading on Inositol phosphate turnover

Irvine R. (2016) A tale of two inositol trisphosphates. Biochem Soc Trans 44: 202‐11 [PMID:26862207]

Livermore TM et al. (2016) Phosphate, inositol and polyphosphates. Biochem Soc Trans 44: 253‐9 [PMID:26862212]

Miyamoto A et al. (2017) Probes for manipulating and monitoring IP3. Cell Calcium 64: 57‐64 [PMID:27887748]

Windhorst S et al. (2017) Inositol‐1,4,5‐trisphosphate 3‐kinase‐A (ITPKA) is frequently over‐expressed and functions as an oncogene in several tumor types. Biochem Pharmacol 137: 1‐9 [PMID:28377279]

Overview

Lanosterol is a precursor for cholesterol, which is synthesized primarily in the liver in a pathway often described as the mevalonate or HMG‐CoA reductase pathway. The first two steps (formation of acetoacetyl CoA and the mitochondrial generation of (S)‐3‐hydroxy‐3‐methylglutaryl‐CoA) are also associated with oxidation of fatty acids.

Further reading on Lanosterol biosynthesis pathway

Moutinho M et al. (2017) The mevalonate pathway in neurons: It's not just about cholesterol. Exp Cell Res [PMID:28232115]

Mullen PJ et al. (2016) The interplay between cell signalling and the mevalonate pathway in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 16: 718‐731 [PMID:27562463]

Ness GC. (2015) Physiological feedback regulation of cholesterol biosynthesis: Role of translational control of hepatic HMG‐CoA reductase and possible involvement of oxylanosterols. Biochim Biophys Acta 1851: 667‐73 [PMID:25701719]

Porter TD. (2015) Electron Transfer Pathways in Cholesterol Synthesis. Lipids 50: 927‐36 [PMID:26344922]

Samaras K et al. (2016) Does statin use cause memory decline in the elderly? Trends Cardiovasc Med 26: 550‐65 [PMID:27177529]

Overview

The de novo synthesis and salvage of nucleosides have been targetted for therapeutic advantage in the treatment of particular cancers and gout. Dihydrofolate reductase produces tetrahydrofolate, a cofactor required for synthesis of purines, pyrimidines and amino acids. GART allows formylation of phosphoribosylglycinamide, an early step in purine biosynthesis. Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase produces orotate, a key intermediate in pyrimidine synthesis. IMP dehydrogenase generates xanthosine monophosphate, an intermediate in GTP synthesis.

Comments

Thymidylate synthetase allows the interconversion of dUMP and dTMP, thereby acting as a crucial step in DNA synthesis. Purine nucleoside phosphorylase allows separation of a nucleoside into the nucleobase and ribose phosphate for nucleotide salvage. Xanthine dehydrogenase generates urate in the purine degradation pathway. Post‐translational modifications of xanthine dehydrogenase convert the enzymatic reaction to a xanthine oxidase, allowing the interconversion of hypoxanthine and xanthine, with the production (or consumption) of reactive oxygen species. Ribonucleotide reductases allow the production of deoxyribonucleotides from ribonucleotides.

Further reading on Nucleoside synthesis and metabolism

Day RO et al. (2016) Xanthine oxidoreductase and its inhibitors: relevance for gout. Clin Sci (Lond) 130: 2167‐2180 [PMID:27798228]

Okafor ON et al. (2017) Allopurinol as a therapeutic option in cardiovascular disease. Pharmacol Ther 172: 139‐150 [PMID:27916655]

Sramek M et al. (2017) Much more than you expected: The non‐DHFR‐mediated effects of methotrexate. Biochim Biophys Acta 1861: 499‐503 [PMID:27993660]

Overview

S1P (sphingosine 1‐phosphate) is a pro‐survival signal, in contrast to ceramide. It is formed by the sphingosine kinase‐catalysed phosphorylation of sphingosine. S1P can be released from cells to act as an agonist at a family of five G protein‐coupled receptors (S1P1‐5) but also has intracellular targets. S1P can be dephosphorylated back to sphingosine or hydrolysed to form hexadecanal and phosphoethanolamine. Sphingosine choline phosphotransferase (EC 2.7.8.10) generates sphingosylphosphocholine from sphingosine and CDP‐choline. Sphingosine β‐galactosyltransferase (EC 2.4.1.23) generates psychosine from sphingosine in the presence of UDP‐α‐D‐galactose. The molecular identities of these enzymes have not been confirmed.

Further reading on Sphingosine kinases

Adams DR et al. (2016) Sphingosine Kinases: Emerging Structure‐Function Insights. Trends Biochem Sci 41: 395‐409 [PMID:27021309]

Marfe G et al. (2015) Sphingosine kinases signalling in carcinogenesis. Mini Rev Med Chem 15: 300‐14 [PMID:25723458]

Pyne NJ et al. (2017) Sphingosine Kinase 2 in Autoimmune/Inflammatory Disease and the Development of Sphingosine Kinase 2 Inhibitors. Trends Pharmacol Sci 38: 581‐591 [PMID:28606480]

Pyne S et al. (2016) Sphingosine 1‐phosphate and sphingosine kinases in health and disease: Recent advances. Prog Lipid Res 62: 93‐106 [PMID:26970273]

Santos WL et al. (2015) Drugging sphingosine kinases. ACS Chem Biol 10: 225‐33 [PMID:25384187]

Further reading on Sphingosine 1‐phosphate lyase

Ebenezer DL et al. (2016) Targeting sphingosine‐1‐phosphate signaling in lung diseases. Pharmacol Ther 168: 143‐157 [PMID:27621206]

Sanllehi P et al. (2016) Inhibitors of sphingosine‐1‐phosphate metabolism (sphingosine kinases and sphingosine‐1‐phosphate lyase). Chem Phys Lipids 197: 69‐81 [PMID:26200919]

Overview

The thyroid hormones triiodothyronine and thyroxine, usually abbreviated as triiodothyronine and T4, respectively, are synthesized in the thyroid gland by sequential metabolism of tyrosine residues in the glycosylated homodimeric protein thyroglobulin (TG, P01266) under the influence of the haem‐containing protein iodide peroxidase. Iodide peroxidase/TPO is a haem‐containing enzyme, from the same structural family as eosinophil peroxidase (EPX, P11678), lactoperoxidase (LPO, P22079) and myeloperoxidase (MPO, P05164). Circulating thyroid hormone is bound to thyroxine‐binding globulin (SERPINA7, P05543).

Tissue deiodinases

These are 1 TM selenoproteins that remove an iodine from T4(3,3',5,5'‐tetraiodothyronine) to generate triiodothyronine(3,3',5‐triiodothyronine, a more potent agonist at thyroid hormone receptors) or rT3(rT3, 3,3',5'‐triiodothyronine, a relatively inactive analogue). DIO1 is also able to deiodinate RT3 to form 3,3'‐diidothyronine (T2). Iodotyrosine deiodinase is a 1TM homodimeric enzyme.

Further reading on Thyroid hormone turnover

Darras VM et al. (2015) Intracellular thyroid hormone metabolism as a local regulator of nuclear thyroid hormone receptor‐mediated impact on vertebrate development. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1849: 130‐41 [PMID:24844179]

Gereben B et al. (2015) Scope and limitations of iodothyronine deiodinases in hypothyroidism. Nat Rev Endocrinol 11: 642‐52 [PMID:26416219]

Mondal S et al. (2017) Novel thyroid hormone analogues, enzyme inhibitors and mimetics, and their action. Mol Cell Endocrinol [PMID:28408161]

Schweizer U et al. (2015) New insights into the structure and mechanism of iodothyronine deiodinases. J Mol Endocrinol 55: R37‐52 [PMID:26390881]

van der Spek AH et al. (2017) Thyroid hormone metabolism in innate immune cells. J Endocrinol 232: R67‐R81 [PMID:27852725]

Overview

Hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) is a transcriptional complex that is involved in oxygen homeostasis [466]. At normal oxygen levels, the alpha subunit of HIF (HIF‐1α) is targeted for degradation by prolyl hydroxylation by the prolyl hydrolxyases PHD proteins 1‐3 (HIF‐PHs) whch are 2‐oxoglutarate oxygenases responsible for the post‐translational modification of a specific proline in each of the oxygen‐dependent degradation domains of HIF‐1α. Hydroxylated HIFs are then targeted for proteasomal degradation via the von Hippel‐Lindau ubiquitination complex [245]. Under hypoxic conditions, the hydroxylation reaction is blunted which results in decreased HIF degradation. The surviving HIFs are then available to translocate to the nucleus where they heterodimerize with HIF‐1β, effecting increased expression of hypoxia‐inducible genes.

HIF‐PH enzymes are being investigated as pharmacological targets as their inhibition mimics the hypoxic state and switches on transcription of genes associated with processes such as erythropoiesis and vasculogenesis [151]. Small molecule HIF‐PH inhibitors are in clinical trial as novel therapies for the amelioration of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease [50].

Further reading on 2‐oxoglutarate oxygenases

Ivan M et al. (2017) The EGLN‐HIF O2‐Sensing System: Multiple Inputs and Feedbacks. Mol Cell 66: 772‐779 [PMID:28622522]

Markolovic S et al. (2015) Protein Hydroxylation Catalyzed by 2‐Oxoglutarate‐dependent Oxygenases. J Biol Chem 290: 20712‐22 [PMID:26152730]

Salminen A et al. (2015) 2‐Oxoglutarate‐dependent dioxygenases are sensors of energy metabolism, oxygen availability, and iron homeostasis: potential role in the regulation of aging process. Cell Mol Life Sci 72: 3897‐914 [PMID:26118662]

Wu Y et al. (2017) Application of in‐vitro screening methods on hypoxia inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem 25: 3891‐3899 [PMID:28625716]

Zurlo G et al. (2016) New Insights into Protein Hydroxylation and Its Important Role in Human Diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta 1866: 208‐220 [PMID:27663420]

Further reading on Kynurenine 3‐monooxygenases

Dounay AB et al. (2015) Challenges and Opportunities in the Discovery of New Therapeutics Targeting the Kynurenine Pathway. J Med Chem 58: 8762‐82 [PMID:26207924]

Erhardt S et al. (2017) The kynurenine pathway in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Neuropharmacology 112: 297‐306 [PMID:27245499]

Fujigaki H et al. (2017) L‐Tryptophan‐kynurenine pathway enzymes are therapeutic target for neuropsychiatric diseases: Focus on cell type differences. Neuropharmacology 112: 264‐274 [PMID:26767951]

Smith JR et al. (2016) Kynurenine‐3‐monooxygenase: a review of structure, mechanism, and inhibitors. Drug Discov Today 21: 315‐24 [PMID:26589832]

Song P et al. (2017) Abnormal kynurenine pathway of tryptophan catabolism in cardiovascular diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci 74: 2899‐2916 [PMID:28314892]

Overview

The Poly ADP‐ribose polymerase family is a series of enzymes, where the best characterised members are nuclear proteins which are thought to function by binding to single strand breaks in DNA, allowing the recruitment of repair enzymes by the synthesis of NAD‐derived ADP‐ribose polymers, which are subsequently degraded by a glycohydrolase (PARG, Q86W56).

Further reading on Poly(ADP‐ribose)polymerases

Bai P. (2015) Biology of Poly(ADP‐Ribose) Polymerases: The Factotums of Cell Maintenance. Mol Cell 58: 947‐58 [PMID:26091343]

Bai P et al. (2015) Poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerases as modulators of mitochondrial activity. Trends Endocrinol Metab 26: 75‐83 [PMID:25497347]

Bock FJ et al. (2016) New directions in poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase biology. FEBS J 283: 4017‐4031 [PMID:27087568]

Bock FJ et al. (2015) RNA Regulation by Poly(ADP‐Ribose) Polymerases. Mol Cell 58: 959‐69 [PMID:26091344]

Ryu KW et al. (2015) New facets in the regulation of gene expression by ADP‐ribosylation and poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerases. Chem Rev 115: 2453‐81 [PMID:25575290]

Overview

Farnesyltransferase is a member of the prenyltransferases family which also includes geranylgeranyltransferase types I (EC 2.5.1.59) and II (EC 2.5.1.60) [72]. Protein farnesyltransferase catalyses the post‐translational formation of a thioether linkage between the C‐1 of an isoprenyl group and a cysteine residue fourth from the C‐terminus of a protein (ie to the CaaX motif, where 'a' is an aliphatic amino acid and 'X' is usually serine, methionine, alanine or glutamine; leucine for EC 2.5.1.59) [165]. Farnesyltransferase is a dimer, composed of an alpha and beta subunit and requires Mg2+ and Zn2+ ions as cofactors. The active site is located between the subunits. Prenylation creates a hydrophobic domain on protein tails which acts as a membrane anchor.

Substrates of the prenyltransferases include Ras, Rho, Rab, other Ras‐related small GTP‐binding proteins, G‐protein γ‐subunits, nuclear lamins, centromeric proteins and many proteins involved in visual signal transduction.

In relation to the causative association between oncogenic Ras proteins and cancer, farnesyltransferase has become an important mechanistic drug discovery target.

Information on members of this family may be found in the online database.

Further reading on Protein farnesyltransferase

Gao S et al. (2016) The Role of Geranylgeranyltransferase I‐Mediated Protein Prenylation in the Brain. Mol Neurobiol 53: 6925‐6937 [PMID:26666664]

Shen M et al. (2015) Farnesyltransferase and geranylgeranyltransferase I: structures, mechanism, inhibitors and molecular modeling. Drug Discov Today 20: 267‐76 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25450772[PMID:25450772]

Shen Y et al. (2015) The Recent Development of Farnesyltransferase Inhibitors as Anticancer and Antimalarial Agents. Mini Rev Med Chem 15: 837‐57 [PMID:25963569]

Wang M et al. (2016) Protein prenylation: unique fats make their mark on biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 17: 110‐22 [PMID:26790532]

Overview

Histone deacetylases act as erasers of epigenetic acetylation marks on lysine residues in histones. Removal of the acetyl groups facilitates tighter packing of chromatin (heterochromatin formation) leading to transcriptional repression.

The histone deacetylase family has been classified in to five subfamilies based on phylogenetic comparison with yeast homologues:

Class I contains HDACs 1, 2, 3 and 8

Class IIa contains HDACs 4, 5, 7 and 9

Class IIb contains HDACs 6 and 10

Class III contains the sirtuins (SIRT1‐7)

Class IV contains only HDAC11.

Classes I, II and IV use Zn+ as a co‐factor, whereas catalysis by Class III enzymes requires NAD+ as a co‐factor, and members of this subfamily have ADP‐ribosylase activity in addition to protein deacetylase function [456].

HDACs have more general protein deacetylase activity, being able to deacetylate lysine residues in non‐histone proteins [91] such as microtubules [233], the hsp90 chaperone [281] and the tumour suppressor p53 [322].

Dysregulated HDAC activity has been identified in cancer cells and tumour tissues [305, 444], making HDACs attractive molecular targets in the search for novel mechanisms to treat cancer [567]. Several small molecule HDAC inhibitors are already approved for clinical use: romidepsin, belinostat, vorinostat, panobinostat, belinostat, valproic acid and tucidinostat. HDACs and HDAC inhibitors currently in development as potential anti‐cancer therapeutics are reviewed by Simó‐Riudalbas and Esteller (2015) [478].

Information on members of this family may be found in the online database.

Further reading on Histone deacetylases

Maolanon AR et al. (2017) Natural and Synthetic Macrocyclic Inhibitors of the Histone Deacetylase Enzymes. Chembiochem 18: 5‐49 [PMID:27748555]

Micelli C et al. (2015) Histone deacetylases: structural determinants of inhibitor selectivity. Drug Discov Today 20: 718‐35 [PMID:25687212]

Millard CJ et al. (2017) Targeting Class I Histone Deacetylases in a “Complex” Environment. Trends Pharmacol Sci 38: 363‐377 [PMID:28139258]

Roche J et al. (2016) Inside HDACs with more selective HDAC inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem 121: 451‐83 [PMID:27318122]

Zagni C et al. (2017) The Search for Potent, Small‐Molecule HDACIs in Cancer Treatment: A Decade After Vorinostat. Med Res Rev [PMID:28181261]

Overview

In humans, the peptidyl arginine deiminases (PADIs; HGNC family link) are a family of five enzymes, PADI1‐4 and PADI6. PADIs catalyze the deimination of protein L‐arginine residues to L‐citrulline and ammonia, generating peptidyl‐citrulline on histones, fibrinogen, and other biologically relevant proteins. The human isozymes exhibit tissue‐specific expression patterns [256]. Overexpression and/or increased PADI activity is observed in several diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, lupus, Parkinson's disease, and cancer [37]. Pharmacological PADI inhibition reverses protein‐hypercitrullination and disease in mouse models of multiple sclerosis [366].

Information on members of this family may be found in the online database.

Further reading on Peptidyl arginine deiminases

Koushik S et al. (2017) PAD4: pathophysiology, current therapeutics and future perspective in rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin Ther Targets 21: 433‐447 [PMID:28281906]

Tu R et al. (2016) Peptidyl Arginine Deiminases and Neurodegenerative Diseases. Curr Med Chem 23: 104‐14 [PMID:26577926]

Whiteley CG. (2014) Arginine metabolising enzymes as targets against Alzheimers' disease. Neurochem Int 67: 23‐31 [PMID:24508404]

Overview

The RAS proteins (HRAS, NRAS and KRAS) are small membrane‐localised G protein‐like molecules of 21 kd. They act as an on/off switch linking receptor and non‐receptor tyrosine kinase activation to downstream cytoplasmic or nuclear events. Binding of GTP activates the switch, and hydrolysis of the GTP to GDP inactivates the switch.

The RAS proto‐oncogenes are the most frequently mutated class of proteins in human cancers. Common mutations compromise the GTP‐hydrolysing ability of the proteins causing constitutive activation [495], which leads to increased cell proliferation and decreased apoptosis [598]. Because of their importance in oncogenic transformation these proteins have become the targets of intense drug discovery effort [25].

Information on members of this family may be found in the online database.

Further reading on RAS subfamily

Dorard C et al. (2017) Deciphering the RAS/ERK pathway in vivo Biochem Soc Trans 45: 27‐36 [PMID:28202657]

Keeton AB et al. (2017) The RAS‐Effector Interaction as a Drug Target. Cancer Res 77: 221‐226 [PMID:28062402]

Lu S et al. (2016) Ras Conformational Ensembles, Allostery, and Signaling. Chem Rev 116: 6607‐65 [PMID:26815308]

Ostrem JM et al. (2016) Direct small‐molecule inhibitors of KRAS: from structural insights to mechanism‐based design. Nat Rev Drug Discov 15: 771‐785 [PMID:27469033]

Papke B et al. (2017) Drugging RAS: Know the enemy. Science 355: 1158‐1163 [PMID:28302824]

Quah SY et al. (2016) Pharmacological modulation of oncogenic Ras by natural products and their derivatives: Renewed hope in the discovery of novel anti‐Ras drugs. Pharmacol Ther 162: 35‐57 [PMID:27016467]

Simanshu DK et al. (2017) RAS Proteins and Their Regulators in Human Disease. Cell 170: 17‐33 [PMID:28666118]

Overview

Carbonic anhydrases facilitate the interconversion of water and carbon dioxide with bicarbonate ions and protons (EC 4.2.1.1), with over a dozen gene products identified in man. The enzymes function in acid‐base balance and the movement of carbon dioxide and water. They are targetted for therapeutic gain by particular antiglaucoma agents and diuretics.

Further reading on 4.2.1.1 Carbonic anhydrases

Frost SC. (2014) Physiological functions of the alpha class of carbonic anhydrases. Subcell Biochem 75: 9‐30 [PMID:24146372]

Supuran CT. (2017) Advances in structure‐based drug discovery of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Expert Opin Drug Discov 12: 61‐88 [PMID:27783541]

Supuran CT. (2016) Structure and function of carbonic anhydrases. Biochem J 473: 2023‐32 [PMID:27407171]

Overview

DNA topoisomerases regulate the supercoiling of nuclear DNA to influence the capacity for replication or transcription. The enzymatic function of this series of enzymes involves cutting the DNA to allow unwinding, followed by re‐attachment to reseal the backbone. Members of the family are targetted in anti‐cancer chemotherapy.

Further reading on DNA topoisomerases

Bansal S et al. (2017) Topoisomerases: Resistance versus Sensitivity, How Far We Can Go? Med Res Rev 37: 404‐438 [PMID:27687257]

Capranico G et al. (2017) Type I DNA Topoisomerases. J Med Chem 60: 2169‐2192 [PMID:28072526]

Nagaraja V et al. (2017) DNA topoisomerase I and DNA gyrase as targets for TB therapy. Drug Discov Today 22: 510‐518 [PMID:27856347]

Pommier Y et al. (2016) Roles of eukaryotic topoisomerases in transcription, replication and genomic stability. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 17: 703‐721 [PMID:27649880]

Seol Y et al. (2016) The dynamic interplay between DNA topoisomerases and DNA topology. Biophys Rev 8: 101‐111 [PMID:28510219]

References 604

  1. 1.

    Aaltonen N et al. (2013 ) [23521796].

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    Abita JP et al. (1976 ) [182695].

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    Adam‐Klages S et al. (1996 ) [8808629].

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    Agarwal RP et al. (1977 ) [849330].

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    Ahn K et al. (2007 ) [17949010].

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    Ahn K et al. (2009 ) [19389627].

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    Ahn K et al. (2010 ) [21115843].

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    Akama T et al. (2009 ) [19303290].

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    Alaamery MA et al. ((2010) ) [20228279].

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    Alberts AW et al. (1980 ) [6933445].

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Alexander SP et al. (2007 ) [17876303].

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    Almahariq M et al. (2013 ) [23066090].

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    Ancian P et al. (1995 ) [7548076].

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    Aoki M et al. (2000 ) [10991987].

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    Apsel B et al. (2008 ) [18849971].

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Aritake K et al. (2006 ) [16547010].

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    Asimakopoulou A et al. (2013 ) [23488457].

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    AstraZeneca. AZ12971554. Accessed on 12/09/2014. astrazeneca.com.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    Avvaru BS et al. (2010 ) [20605094].

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    Babbedge RC et al. (1993 ) [7693279].

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    Bachovchin DA et al. (2010 ) [21084632].

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    Bae YS et al. (1998 ) [9468499].

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    Bae YS et al. (2003 ) [12695532].

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Baggio R et al. (1999 ) [10454520].

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    Baines AT et al. (2011 ) [22004085].

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    Balla A et al. (2008 ) [18077555].

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    Baylin SB et al. (2011 ) [21941284].

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    Beauchamp E et al. (2009 ) [19647031].

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    Beck LH et al. (2009 ) [19571279].

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    Bellier JP et al. (2011 ) [21382474].

    Not in our library

  31. 31.

    Berg S et al. (2012 ) [22489897].

    Not in our library

  32. 32.

    Bergamini G et al. (2012 ) [22544264].

    Not in our library

  33. 33.

    Bergstrom JD et al. (2000 ) [10620343].

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    Bergstrom JD et al. (1993 ) [8419946].

    Not in our library

  35. 35.

    Bhatnagar AS et al. (1990 ) [2149502].

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    Biagi G et al. (1996 ) [8691450].

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    Bicker KL et al. (2013 ) [23175390].

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    Binda C et al. (2004 ) [15027868].

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    Binda C et al. (2008 ) [18426226].

    Not in our library

  40. 40.

    Bisogno T et al. (2003 ) [14610053].

    Not in our library

All 604 references

Cited by papers we hold 8

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.