No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 20, 2026.
Mechanisms of diabetic foot ulceration: A review
Haibo Deng, Binghui Li, Qian Shen and 6 more
Journal of Diabetes · 2023 · Review · CC BY
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are associated with complex pathogenic factors and are considered a serious complication of diabetes. The potential mechanisms underlying DFUs have been increasingly investigated. Previous studies have focused on the three aspects of diabetic peripheral vascular disease, neuropathy, and wound infections. With advances in technology, researchers have been gradually conducting studies using immune cells, endothelial cells, keratinocytes, and fibroblasts, as they are involved in wound healing. It has been reported that the upregulation or downregulation of molecular signaling pathways is essential for the healing of DFUs. With a recent increase in the awareness of epigenetics, its regulatory role in wound healing has become a much sought‐after trend in the treatment of DFUs. This review focuses on four aspects involved in the pathogenesis of DFUs: physiological and pathological mechanisms, cellular mechanisms, molecular signaling pathway mechanisms, and epigenetics. Given the challenge in the treatment of DFUs, we are hopeful that our review will provide new ideas for peers.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 20, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
BACKGROUND
With the aging of the global population, there has been an increase in the number of patients with diabetes every year. The statistics in 2019 projected 135.6 million individuals among the 65–99‐year‐old population worldwide to be diabetic, and this number is expected to reach 195.2 million by 2030, making it the largest global epidemic in the 21st century. The global prevalence of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is about 6.4% in the diabetic population. About 50%–60% of patients with DFUs will develop diabetic foot infection (DFI) and 15% will undergo amputation. The 5‐year risk of death in patients with DFUs is 2.5 times that in patients without foot ulcers. The global direct health expenditure in diabetes was about $700 billion in 2019 and is estimated to increase to $825 billion by 2030, of which the medical costs related to DFUs will account for a third of the total costs incurred in the management of diabetes. Currently, patients with DFU suffer physical, mental, and economic trauma caused by this debilitating condition. Keeping in mind the urgent needs of patients and society, several researchers have begun to focus on research related to DFUs, as the study of its pathogenesis is key in treatment.
The normal wound‐healing process mainly involves the following four stages: (a) in the “hemostasis” stage, vasoconstriction, platelet aggregation, and recruitment of circulating coagulation factors in the wound occur; (b) in the “inflammation” stage, inflammatory cells gather and secrete inflammatory factors; matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)‐9 is secreted by macrophages and neutrophil extracellular reticular traps (NETs) are secreted by neutrophils; (c) in the “proliferation” stage, the inflammation subsides and skin cells, such as keratinocytes secreting epidermal growth factor (EGF), proliferate and migrate to the wound bed; and (d) in the “remodeling” stage, new tissue is remolded and deposited through the extracellular matrix and neovascularization, involving fibroblasts that secrete fibroblast cytokines (FGF) and vascular endothelial cells that secrete vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).,,
In diabetic wounds, tissue ischemia, hypoxia, and high glucose microenvironment interfere with the progress of these programmed healing stages, resulting in delayed healing or nonhealing of the wounds and several clinical complications. The key pathogenic factors in the pathogenesis of diabetic foot are displayed in Figure 1. The mechanism and pathogenesis of DFUs are complex and only a few treatment methods can effectively promote healing; thus, there is an urgent need to develop new methods that can not only reduce expenditure but also effectively cure DFUs. However, the key molecular regulatory mechanisms involved in the healing of DFUs are unclear, and additional studies are warranted for a better understanding of this condition.
Peripheral vascular lesions dominated by atherosclerosis
Peripheral artery disease is an essential factor of foot ulcers in nearly 50% of patients with diabetes. Among them, atherosclerosis is the main cause of peripheral vascular disease. The arterial wall consists of several cells and tissues, including endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC), fibroblasts, and components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) such as elastin and collagen. Abnormal carbohydrate, fat, and protein metabolism in diabetes; the increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS); and the activation of inflammatory mediators can lead to vascular endothelial damage., Arterial endothelial cell injury, vascular smooth muscle dysfunction, inflammatory state, blood hypercoagulability, and abnormal changes in platelets are risk factors that promote atherosclerosis. On the one hand, hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, excessive free fatty acids, and activated advanced glycation end products (AGEs) inhibit the production of nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and ROS and alleviate oxidative stress. On the other hand, these factors can lead to an increase in proinflammatory factors such as transcription factors, nuclear factor‐κB (NF‐κB), and activating protein‐1. In this highly activated inflammatory state, white blood cells adhere to the inner wall of the artery, migrate and phagocytize fat, and transform into foam cells, thereby promoting the formation of atherosclerotic lesions. When macrophages and low‐density lipoproteins (LDLs) penetrate the middle layer of the artery to form foam cells, VSMCs migrate to the arterial stria that is rich in foam cells and lead to the synthesis, secretion, and deposit of ECM, thus promoting atherosclerosis. Moreover, impaired endogenous platelet inhibition in patients with diabetes can readily activate platelets. The activated endothelium produces an excess of adhesion molecules and platelet agonists. The activated platelets stimulate leukocyte recruitment, which is also activated through interaction with platelets and may promote the progression of atherosclerosis and plaque rupture, resulting in thrombosis and vascular occlusion.
Moreover, the extent to which the lower limbs are affected by atherosclerosis in diabetic patients is different from that in nondiabetic patients. In patients with diabetes, the inferior genicular artery (posterior tibial artery and anterior tibial artery) is primarily involved, whereas the femoral and popliteal artery segments (superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery) are involved to a lesser extent. The main iliac artery is usually not involved. Ischemic ulcers or gangrene may occur with the development of tibial artery occlusion or proximal artery occlusion when the arterial perfusion of the foot is inadequate in maintaining the functional integrity of the skin. Therefore, peripheral angiopathy is the initial cause of DFU and also the primary factor leading to amputation and death. Atherosclerosis is the main pathological process of peripheral vascular disease. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture can induce peripheral arterial thrombosis, especially in a diabetic environment, directly leading to arterial occlusion and lower limb ischemia, which, in turn, leads to the formation of DFUs.
Peripheral neuropathy
Diabetic foot neuropathy is closely related to age, disease course, and the extent of diabetes control. Among diabetic complications, the clinical syndrome triggered by injury to the peripheral and autonomic nervous systems is very common. Because of the disordered metabolic environment in diabetes, the pathological changes in the nervous system are closely related to the structural and functional disorders of nerve cells. For example, hyperglycemia, high levels of AGE, excessive acylcarnitine, and oxidized LDLs affect motor, sensory, and other functions by destroying the structure and function of nerve cells. Because of the lack of perception of pain symptoms, the risk of trauma in patients with diabetes is significantly increased; thus, skin damage and ulcers may go unnoticed for weeks or months by both patients and physicians alike. On the one hand, AGEs cause changes in or loss of protein functions; on the other hand, after binding to AGE‐specific receptors (RAGEs), they modify gene expression and mediate intracellular signal transduction, increasing the production of inflammatory mediators and free radicals, which seriously interfere with the release and transport of neuronal transmitters. Because of excessive substrate and oversaturated delivery system, acetyl‐CoA molecules are converted into acylcarnitine, which can cause high stress response and mitochondrial dysfunction in Schwann cells and dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons and induce axonal degeneration, resulting in irreversible damage to the nervous system of diabetic individuals. The clinical manifestations of motor neuropathy are mainly muscular atrophy of the leg and foot, and motor paralysis and loss of muscle reflex can also be observed. Achilles tendon reflex dysfunction is an early symptom of motor neuropathy. Autonomic neuropathy often causes vasomotor dysfunction of the lower extremities, resulting in arteriovenous shunts of the cutaneous vascular network of the lower extremities. Additionally, autonomic neuropathy can cause dysfunction in sweat gland secretion and increase blood perfusion of the deep skin, resulting in skin overheating. Abnormalities in the secretion of sweat glands in the skin can cause excessive evaporation of sweat, leading to drying of the skin of the foot, which further impairs its protective function and increases the risk of foot ulcers. The combination of sensory and motor peripheral neuropathies results in uneven foot pressure load and poor gait. Over time, hyperkeratosis of the compressed skin will form a hematoma and break due to neuropathy and increased plantar pressure load, eventually developing into an ulcer that is difficult to heal.
Studies in rodent models reveal that hyperglycemia alters the function of key plastic molecules of the nervous system, including the expression patterns of neuromodulin, β‐tubulin, heat‐shock protein, and poly‐ADP‐ribose polymerase in DRG., Abnormalities in DRG function, including the change in splice body function, change of motor neuron protein expression, and the upregulation of GW‐body (mRNA processing site), are important links in diabetic neuropathy.
In addition, plasma LDLs in patients with diabetes are oxidized by ROS, after which they bind to oxidized LDL receptors 1 and 4 and RAGE. This, in turn, activates a series of signaling pathways, including caspase 3 and ribonucleic acid pathways, mediating additional inflammatory responses and leading to the accumulation of reactive oxygen free radicals, which can cause irreversible nerve tissue damage., Some studies have found disorders in polyol and inositol metabolism: Na/K‐adenosine triphosphate (ATP) enzyme degradation, neurovascular defects, neurotrophic disorders, axonal transport defects, and nonenzymatic glycosylation of neurons and transport proteins in the nerves of diabetic individuals., Pathological changes in these key pathways can lead to abnormal protein processing, oxidative damage, and mitochondrial dysfunction in neurons, leading to the loss of peripheral nerve function.
Wound infections
Diabetic foot infection is a common and serious complication in patients with diabetes. Insufficient arterial blood supply to the lower extremities and multiple neuropathies increase the risk of diabetic foot infection. DFIs are usually caused by a single bacterium (Staphylococcus aureus). Chronic infections may be to the result of mixed infections by several microorganisms, including not only S. aureus and Streptococcus spp., but also coagulase‐negative staphylococci, enterococci, gram‐negative bacteria, and anaerobes. In addition, the most common fungal pathogens responsible for DFIs are Candida albicans, candida subsmooth, and C. tropicalis. Among them, candida subsmooth is the most common yeast strain isolated from DFU tissue because it is often isolated from under the nails. This mixed infection poses special challenges in the treatment of patients with DFUs especially when complicated by bacterial and fungal infections. Persistent DFIss are closely related to immune cell dysfunction, including impaired immune function (leukopenia) and inflammatory response disorder (persistent inflammation of macrophages), which are discussed subsequently.
Changes in the primary cellular biological functions in patients with DFUs
Immune cells, keratinocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and different cytokines are involved in the healing of DFUs. In the inflammatory stage, infiltrating monocytes/macrophages in the wound are essential for the transformation of the wound from a proinflammatory to an anti‐inflammatory environment. In the later stage of normal wound inflammation, macrophages change from the proinflammatory to the anti‐inflammatory phenotype. However, in individuals with DFUs, the macrophage function/phenotypic transition is impaired and macrophages continue to maintain a proinflammatory state. Clinical and experimental evidence shows that, contrary to that observed in normal tissue, healing of DFUs is characterized by leukocyte recruitment, macrophage activation, and the production of proinflammatory cytokines, showing a chronic proinflammatory state. In addition, the phagocytic ability of macrophages in DFU wounds is significantly impaired and ineffective in removing necrotic tissue from the wound. In addition to macrophage response, the inflammatory response is enhanced by neutrophils and can adversely affect the healing of diabetic wounds. In diabetic wounds, phagocytosis, neutrophil degranulation, and the anti‐infective effects of ROS are disrupted. Excessive infiltration and activation at the site of tissue injury mediate tissue damage by releasing cytokines and proteases and regulating the adaptive immune response. Moreover, the expression of neutrophil protein arginine deiminase (PAD)‐4 is upregulated by hyperglycemia. When neutrophils invade the wound, their ability to secrete NETs is inhibited, resulting in delayed wound healing., Macrophages and neutrophils secrete proteases in the form of zymogen, which is activated outside the cell and degrades ECM proteins (elastin and interstitial collagen). For example, MMP degrades fibronectin into fragments and further activates MMPs. These fibronectin fragments cause leukocyte infiltration, tissue damage, and persistent inflammation. Therefore, different cells will play a therapeutic role with unique functions in diabetic wound healing (Figure 2).
In the healing stage of DFUs, reepithelialization and dermal repair play a vital role in skin tissue regeneration. Studies have shown that during wound reepithelialization, keratinocytes migrate to the wound site and proliferate and differentiate into different structures to restore the integrity of the structure and function of the epidermis. The order followed from the inside to the outside is skin epidermis, basal cell layer, spinous cell layer, granular cell layer, and stratum corneum. In the early stage of wound healing, keratinocytes can directly kill invasive pathogens by secreting cytokines, chemokines, antimicrobial peptides, and extracellular vesicles to mediate the interaction between keratinocytes and circulating immune cells, thereby promoting wound healing. However, the high glucose environment of diabetic wounds disrupts the normal functioning of keratinocytes, resulting in delayed wound reepithelialization. Dermal repair is mainly achieved by the proliferation, differentiation, and secretion of ECM components of fibroblasts. Special fibroblasts in the upper (papillary) layer can form hair papillae and regulate hair follicle growth and hair regeneration. Lower layer (reticular) fibroblasts are primarily involved in maintaining the morphological structure of the dermis, providing a stable environment for angiogenesis, nerve regeneration, and immune‐clearance activities. Additionally, fibroblasts can differentiate into myofibroblasts that promote wound contraction, secrete proteases and MMPs to degrade the inflammatory matrix, and secrete collagen and other ECM proteins to participate in the formation of granulation tissue. Collagen III in the ECM is replaced by collagen I, which has a higher tensile strength. However, hyperglycemia and the accumulation of AGEs lead to impaired fibroblast function, such as decreased proliferation, accelerated apoptosis, and inhibition of migration to the wound site, all of which lead to impaired dermal repair and delayed healing of diabetic wounds.,
Endothelial cell quality and neovascularization play a vital role in wound healing. Endothelial cells are generally arranged on the inner surface of the vascular lumen and regulate vasoconstriction and dilatation by modulating the levels of vasoactive factors such as eNOS. In wound healing, endothelial cells at different stages of angiogenesis are mainly regulated by VEGF. In the inflammatory stage, VEGF increases vascular permeability, affects the expression of selectin and intercellular adhesion molecules in endothelial cells, and promotes the recruitment of leukocytes to the injured site. In the proliferation stage, VEGF strongly stimulates the proliferation and migration of endothelial cells, whereas, in the remodeling stage, it induces endothelial cell assembly to promote vascular lumen formation. In vivo studies have shown that arterial endothelial cells in a hyperglycemic environment lose their integrity. They are more prone to apoptosis and to shedding and entering the blood circulation, leading to angiogenesis disorders. This damage is mainly attributed to the following five pathways: (a) polyol pathway, (b) increase of intracellular AGEs, (c) upregulation of RAGE, (d) activation of various subtypes of protein kinase C, and (e) overactivation of the hexosamine pathway. In diabetes, the decrease in NOS due to peripheral neuropathy and peripheral arterial disease leads to a decrease in peripheral blood flow by vasoconstriction. The lack of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in the wound inhibits the formation of new blood vessels and delays wound healing.
Stem cells are the critical cells in postinjury and routine homeostasis skin repair in the healing of DFU. Stem cells have the characteristics of asymmetric replication, the potential of strong self‐renewal, and multidifferentiation. In particular, the functional state of EPCs and epidermal stem cells (ESCs) critically influences the process of wound healing. EPC functions such as migration, differentiation, adhesion, and tube formation are impaired in the hyperglycemic state of diabetes, which causes long‐term wound nonhealing, particularly in chronic wounds like diabetic wounds. As the precursor of endothelial cells, EPCs migrate from bone marrow to peripheral blood under the action of hypoxia inducible factor‐1, stromal cell derived factor‐1α, and VEGF and are recruited to the ischemic site to form new blood vessels through adhesion, proliferation, differentiation, and tube formation to repair wounds. Moreover, ESCs also play an indispensable role in process of wound healing. In vitro experiments show that ESCs enhance the proliferation and migration of diabetic fibroblasts and macrophages (Mφ), and promote alternative or M2 Mφ polarization. In wounds of db/db mice, treatment with ESCs accelerate wound healing by decreasing inflammation, augmenting wound cell proliferation, stimulating angiogenesis, and inducing M2 Mφ polarization.
In recent years, intercellular communications play an important role in the development of many diseases. As an important mediator of cellular communication, exosomes carry and transmit important signaling molecules and are widely involved in intercellular material transport and information transfer; they regulate cellular physiological activities and are closely related to the occurrence and course of various diseases. Under physiological and pathological conditions, almost all cells can produce and secrete exosomes, including immune cells (such as B cells, T cells, mast cells, dendritic cells), platelets, cancer cells, epithelial cells, mesenchyme cells, neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes., Exosomes are widespread and distributed in various body fluids, they are rich in nucleic acids (microRNA, lncRNA, circRNA, mRNA, tRNA, etc.), proteins, lipids, etc. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC)‐exosomal ncRNAs have shown great potential in skin healing as it promotes wound healing. A study by Liang et al found that human adipose‐derived MSC secreted exosomes (adMSC‐Exo) could translocate microRNA‐125a (miR‐125a) to endothelial cells and promote angiogenesis by inhibiting delta‐like 4 (DLL4). This may have a function in wound repair in DFUs. Additionally, Xu Juan et al found that miRNA‐221‐3p was highly expressed in EPC‐derived exosomes and promoted wound healing in diabetic mice. Moreover, a study by Qijun Lu et al found that engineered human adipose stem cell‐derived exosomes containing miR‐21‐5p could promote keratin formation and cell proliferation and migration via Wnt/β‐catenin signaling in vitro and increase epithelial reformation, collagen remodeling, angiogenesis, and maturation in vivo to promote diabetic skin wound healing. However, there are still many challenges in applying exosomal ncRNAs in actual clinical treatment. With further research, exosomal ncRNAs will show great value in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diabetic foot.
The role of the main signaling pathway of DFU
In the human life cycle, signaling pathways are involved in the occurrence, development, and outcome of various diseases. Signaling pathways have both positive and negative regulatory effects. Whether positive regulation or negative regulation, these pathways are involved not only in disease progression but also in disease treatment. Moreover, several signaling pathways cross‐regulate each other, and this complex network of regulation brings infinite possibilities to research. In the next section, we explore, in detail, the regulatory role of important signaling pathways involved in diabetic wound healing (Figure 3).
Role of the phosphatidylinositol‐3‐kinas/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/Akt/mTOR) signaling pathway in the healing process of DFUs
The PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway is involved in regulating the occurrence and recovery of many diseases and plays a role in the migration, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of repaired cells in the healing of diabetic ulcers. Studies have found that the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway can regulate the accumulation of lipids in endothelial cells and fibroblasts to prevent diabetic wound cell fading and enhance wound healing., When the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signal pathway is activated, it can upregulate the expression of VEGF, FGF, and EGF; promote proliferation, migration, angiogenesis, and collagen synthesis; and induce epithelial‐mesenchymal transition (EMT) and stimulate wound healing., Activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway not only enhances the mRNA expression of alpha smooth muscle actin, fibronectin, collagen (COL1A1, COL3A1), and transforming growth factor beta but also promotes the proliferation and differentiation of fibroblasts, thereby accelerating wound closure. In the wounds of individuals with hyperglycemia, protein kinase B (AKT) phosphorylation can directly phosphorylate eNOS and induce NO production after activation of the PI3K/AKT‐eNOS pathway, serving as a key regulator of vascular protection, maintaining endothelial cell function, and promoting angiogenesis, thus indicating its role in diabetic wound healing.
Role of Wnt/ β‐catenin signaling pathway in the healing of DFUs
The Wnt/β‐catenin pathway is a very conservative signaling pathway that participates in several biological processes such as inflammation, carcinogenesis, fibrosis and angiogenesis, cell proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation. It is also an important signaling pathway that regulates wound healing., Healing is accelerated in normal wounds when the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway is upregulated and the proliferation, differentiation, and migration of epidermal cells are enhanced. In DFUs, downregulated Wnt/β‐catenin signaling leads to suppression of the biological activity of skin cells and the expression of cytokines, resulting in immune dysfunction of the wound, dysplasia of granulation tissue, and reepithelialization disorders, thus delaying wound healing. In addition, pigment epithelium‐derived factor in diabetic wounds inhibits Wnt/β‐catenin signaling, resulting in mobilization and dysfunction of EPCs, thereby inhibiting angiogenesis and delaying wound healing. In the wound‐healing stage of ulcers, macrophages are closely related to the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway. Wnt5a affects the inflammatory response by regulating macrophage phenotype. Wnt7b is also a key protein that promotes wound angiogenesis. Some studies show that downregulation of the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway may be related to a decrease in Rspo protein caused by diabetes. Studies have shown that hyperglycemia affects the proliferation, migration, and collagen secretion of fibroblasts through phosphorylation of β‐catenin and its accumulation in the cytoplasm, migration to the nucleus, and regulation of target gene transcription.
Role of Notch signaling pathway in the healing of DFUs
The Notch pathway plays a key role in cell differentiation, proliferation, and angiogenesis and participates in the regulation of tissue homeostasis in humans. In diabetic wounds, Notch pathway dysfunction can lead to inhibition of cell differentiation, proliferation disorders, and reduced angiogenesis, all of which interfere with diabetic wound healing. Some studies report that Notch1 activation leads to impaired proliferation of keratinocytes, whereas a defect in Notch1 signaling in keratinocytes leads to excessive epidermal proliferation in mice that may even result in skin tumors. Hyperglycemia directly promotes the pathological activation of Notch1 signals in the skin of diabetic individuals by activating the positive feedback loop between the Dll4 ligand and Notch1 receptor, which inhibits diabetic wound healing. Moreover, Notch signaling is closely related to the development and differentiation of monocytes and macrophages. In DFUs, high levels of kallikrein binding protein activate the Notch signal pathway, promote macrophage polarization to M1, increase the number of macrophages in the wound, and lead to a pronounced inflammatory response, which slows down wound healing in patients with diabetes.
Role of Janus kinase and signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK–STAT) signaling pathway in the healing of DFUs
The JAK–STAT signaling pathway is essential in maintaining balance in the body. In diabetic individuals, growth factors and chemokines can activate the JAK–STAT pathway. When the STAT protein is phosphorylated by JAK protein, as it constitutes an essential step to ensure dimerization, nuclear translocation, DNA attachment, and transcription of target genes. A recent study found that the expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) in diabetic wounds decreased significantly. Moreover, during most of the wound‐healing period, the expression of interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) and IL‐6R α increased significantly, resulting in a sharp increase in phosphorylated STAT3 levels, leading to the dysfunctional inflammation of diabetic wounds. In addition, the gp130/JAK–STAT3 signal loop mediated by IL‐6R is negatively regulated by SOCS3. SOCS3 is expressed in the epithelium of the wound and its overexpression delays the healing of diabetic wounds by interfering with the proliferation and migration of keratinocytes. In DFUs, the upregulation of forkhead box protein M1 (FOXM1) and STAT3 mediates impaired immune cell activation, recruitment, and survival, resulting in delayed wound healing. Photobiological regulation at 660 nm promotes the secretion of EGF and EGF receptor (EGFR) in diabetic wounds and activates the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in fibroblasts, leading to the migration and proliferation of downstream cells, which promote wound healing. In short, JAK–STAT mediates the biological activity of various cytokines/chemokines; thus, the regulation of JAK–STAT signaling is a promising target for the treatment of diabetic wounds.
Role of NF‐κB signaling pathway in the healing of DFUs
The NF‐κB pathway regulates hundreds of genes that are involved in several important cellular responses, such as inflammation, cell migration, proliferation, and apoptosis. Moreover, NF‐κB regulates the expression of proinflammatory genes in macrophages and granulation area and enhances the expression of degrading enzymes in cytokine synthesis, including cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules. The activated NF‐κB complex is transferred to the nucleus, where it binds to the DNA in the B‐binding motif to promote the expression of proinflammatory enzymes and proinflammatory factors such as IL‐6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α, and inducible NOS. In addition, inflammatory disorders mediated by NF‐κB can lead to wound inflammation and neurodegenerative diseases. High glucose levels can induce the activation of NF‐κB, promote apoptosis of human endothelial cells by enhancing caspase‐3 activity, and delay wound healing in individuals with diabetes mellitus. Some studies have confirmed that negative pressure wound therapy can inhibit the release of proinflammatory enzymes and cytokines by preventing the activation of NF‐κB, thereby increasing wound‐healing rate, reducing healing time, and lowering the risk of amputation. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy activating the NF‐κB signal can promote stromal cell derived factor‐1 and VEGF expression in fibroblasts, regulate cell proliferation and migration, and promote angiogenesis and wound healing. The NF‐κB signaling pathway is one of the key pathways of nuclear signal regulation and its functional changes in DFUs directly determine wound healing. However, there is limited clarity regarding the key molecules that determine the activation or inhibition of NF‐κB signaling pathway; thus, in‐depth studies are required.
Epigenetic changes in DFUs
DFU is a severe complication of diabetes and epigenetics has been shown to play a key regulatory role. There are three main types of epigenetic gene regulation: DNA modification, biochemical modification of histone tail, and ATP‐dependent chromatin remodeling. For example, DNA methylation caused by long‐term hyperglycemia and noncoding RNA modification caused by gene–environment interaction can lead to complications. Therefore, in‐depth studies on the epigenetic mechanism of DFUs will greatly improve the current situation and shed light on the healing process. The subsequent sections focus on the epigenetic regulatory mechanisms of the primary cells involved in the healing of DFUs, including the effects of gene methylation, demethylation, and histone modification in inflammatory cells, keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and vascular endothelial cells.
Epigenetic regulation of inflammatory cells
Some studies have shown the effects of DNA methylation and demethylation on the function of inflammatory cells in diabetic wounds. For example, H3K27 demethylase and Jumonji‐domain‐containing protein D3 (JMJD3) have been shown to play a role in the activation of pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory macrophage phenotypes. In mouse macrophages, JMJD3 can be upregulated by lipopolysaccharide and IL‐4 to promote the expression of proinflammatory genes or IL‐4 target genes. It has been reported that the inhibition of DNA methyltransferase‐1 (DNMT1) by 5‐azacytidine promotes the formation of M2 macrophages and inhibits the inflammation of bone marrow‐derived macrophages (BMDMs). DNMT1 in BMDMs increase and enhance the production of proinflammatory macrophage phenotype in a type 2 diabetes mouse model of genetically modified and diet‐induced obesity. Wound healing in knockout DNMT1 and db/db mice has shown significant improvement. In the inflammatory stage of wound healing, mixed leukemia gene (MLL)1 has been shown to promote the deposition of H3K4me3 in macrophages and reduce the inflammatory response in diabetic wounds. Thus, MLL1 plays an important role in regulating macrophage‐mediated inflammation in wound healing. In the diet‐induced obesity model of diabetes, macrophages promote the methylation expression of JMJD and H3K4, which in turn reduces the methylation of H3K27. Among them, the increase in JMJD3 levels has been indicated as the likely reason for the decrease in H3K27 methylation. JMJD3 stimulates IL‐12 expression in wound macrophages, which can delay wound healing. Neutrophil activity in the healing of DFUs is also regulated by epigenetics. During NETosis, neutrophils are activated by PAD‐4 and undergo histone citrullination, resulting in exocytosis and apoptosis of the complex formed by NETs. Although this process protects against infection by engulfing the bacteria, the release of NETosis can interfere with wound tissue healing. In fact, the typical granule components of NETs such as neutrophil protease3, neutrophil elastase, and myeloperoxidase; and nuclear components such as histones H2A, H2B, and H3 increase in nonhealing diabetic wounds. Thus, the epigenetic regulation of neutrophils is closely related to the interference with wound healing.
Epigenetic regulation of keratinocytes and fibroblasts
Abnormal DNA methylation has been confirmed in keratinocytes and fibroblasts in DFUs in humans and is closely related to reepithelialization, angiogenesis, and extracellular matrix precipitation. For example, JMJD3 promotes the migration of keratinocytes to the wound site by increasing Notch1 expression. Tumor necrosis factor‐α promotes MMP9 expression in keratinocytes, depending on the specific demethylation of MMP9 promoter, thereby delaying the migration and proliferation of keratinocytes, which is closely related to the nonhealing of diabetic wounds. In addition, ASH1L‐targeting histone H3 is related to the methylation of K4, K9, K20, and K36 at the active gene promoter. The absence of Ash1l hinders the reepithelialization of normal wounds. Expression of the miR‐197‐3p target caveolin‐1 in fibroblasts is significantly upregulated in unhealed DFU tissues. Inhibiting caveolin‐1 expression and activating the EGFR pathway can stimulate the migration and proliferation of fibroblasts and accelerate wound healing. Therefore, reprogramming the diabetic fibroblasts inhibits the expression of negative regulatory factors through the regulation of miR; thus, mature fibroblasts can promote the epigenetic characteristics of wound healing.
Epigenetic regulation of vascular endothelial cells
In DFU wounds, an increase in cellular ATP can stimulate wound healing by increasing angiogenesis and collagen production. Human mammary epithelial cells cultured in high glucose conditions show epigenetic changes that increase the expression of the NF‐κB‐subunit p65 gene, induce the secretion of vascular cell adhesion molecule‐1, mediate leukocyte‐endothelial cell adhesion, and finally promote the development of atherosclerotic lesions of the vascular wall. This epigenetic change is due to H3K4 methylation and H3K9 demethylation of lysine‐specific demethylase‐1 in the NF‐κB‐p65 promoter, which leads to the continuous open state of NF‐κB‐p65 transcriptional activity. In addition, the increased transcription of NF‐κβ‐p65, monocyte chemoattractant protein‐1, and IL‐6 in the aortic endothelial cells of patients with DFUs can lead to the overexpression of miR‐125b and downregulation of miR‐146a‐5p, which is a regulator of endothelial dysfunction in metabolic memory. Thus, miR‐125b and miR‐146a‐5p may be explored as novel targets to promote wound healing in diabetic individuals. During wound healing, endothelial cells secrete a large amount of miR‐191. As a downstream effect, the miRNA targets the silencing small band‐1 gene, which encodes a multidomain functional protein that regulates cell adhesion, tissue structure maintenance, angiogenesis, and cell migration during tissue repair, resulting in difficulties in wound healing in individuals with diabetes.
Future perspectives
Currently, there is great potential and significant room for improvement with respect to the pathogenesis and treatment of DFUs. First, it is necessary to clearly understand the pathogenesis of DFUs as it is the cornerstone of curing this condition. Only by accurately comprehending the regulation of the pathogenesis of DFUs can new drugs or interventions for relevant targets be developed.
Additionally, the use of stem cells to treat DFUs is emerging as a promising treatment. Embryonic and mesenchymal stem cells can be induced to differentiate into myofibroblasts, keratinocytes, and endothelial cells, which are components of wound healing. At the same time, stem cells synthesize and secrete several cytokines to promote cell recruitment, immune regulation, ECM remodeling, angiogenesis, and nerve regeneration. However, unlimited cloning and proliferation of stem cells pose great challenges, such as the formation of skin tumors, in clinical treatment. We always firmly believed that based on the unremitting efforts of researchers worldwide, stem cell proliferation and differentiation will eventually be accurately regulated and streamlined.
However, reverse differentiation of cells also shows promise in the clinical treatment of DFUs. Our research team found that keratinocytes can reverse‐differentiate into embryonic progenitor cells when induced by basic fibroblasts and can participate in angiogenesis, reepithelialization, and ECM precipitation., These findings have been partially verified in cell‐based experiments as well as in mice.
CONCLUSIONS
To summarize, we need to devote ourselves to research on the pathogenesis of DFUs at different levels, constantly explore new key regulatory targets, develop novel products for use in a clinical setting, and identify measures that could promote the healing of DFUs.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Conception and design: Haibo Deng, Binghui Li; collection and assembly of data: Haibo Deng, Chenchen Zhang, Liewn Kuang, SiYuan Wang, ZhiQiang Ma; data analysis and interpretation: Haibo Deng, Qian Shen, Ran Chen, Gongchi Li; graphic illustration: Haibo Deng; manuscript writing: all authors; manuscript revision: Haibo Deng, Gongchi Li; final approval of manuscript: all authors.
FUNDING INFORMATION
This work was supported by Building Project of Hubei Natural Science Foundation Project (2020CFB696) and Medical letter of the State Health Office (National Natural Science Foundation of China [81801922] and Research and Development Program of Hubei Province [2020BCB029]).
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
None declared.
ETHICAL APPROVAL
No human or animal studies involved or no ethical statement for the study.
References 127
- 1.
Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the international diabetes federation diabetes atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157:107843.
Not in our library10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843
- 2.
Zhang P, Lu J, Jing Y, Tang S, Zhu D, Bi Y. Global epidemiology of diabetic foot ulceration: a systematic review and meta‐analysis †. Ann Med. 2017;49(2):106‐116.
Not in our library10.1080/07853890.2016.1231932
- 3.
Walsh JW, Hoffstad OJ, Sullivan MO, Margolis DJ. Association of diabetic foot ulcerand death in a population‐based cohort from the United Kingdom. Diabet Med. 2016;33(11):1493‐1498.
Not in our library10.1111/dme.13054
- 4.
Williams R, Karuranga S, Malanda B, et al. Global and regional estimates and projections of diabetes‐related health expenditure: results from the international diabetes federation diabetes atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020;162:108072.
Not in our library10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108072
- 5.
Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y, Longaker MT. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature. 2008;453(7193):314‐321.
Not in our library10.1038/nature07039
- 6.
Shaw TJ, Martin P. Wound repair at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2009;122(18):3209‐3213.
Not in our library10.1242/jcs.031187
- 7.
Wicks K, Torbica T, Mace KA. Myeloid cell dysfunction and the pathogenesis of thediabetic chronic wound. Semin Immunol. 2014;26(4):341‐353.
Not in our library10.1016/j.smim.2014.04.006
- 8.
Davis FM, Kimball A, Boniakowski A, Gallagher K. Dysfunctional wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers: new crossroads. Curr Diab Rep. 2018;18(1):2.
Not in our library10.1007/s11892-018-0970-z
- 9.
Dinh TL, Veves A. A review of the mechanisms implicated in the pathogenesis of the diabetic foot. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2005;4(3):154‐159.
Not in our library10.1177/1534734605280130
- 10.
Mazurek R, Dave JM, Chandran RR, et al. Vascular cells in blood Vessel Wall development and disease. Adv Pharmacol. 2017;78:323‐350.
Not in our library10.1016/bs.apha.2016.08.001
- 11.
Hasegawa Y, Saito T, Ogihara T, et al. Blockade of the nuclear factor‐κB pathway inthe endothelium prevents insulin resistance and prolongs life spans. Circulation. 2012;125(9):1122‐1133.
Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.111.054346
- 12.
Xu S, Ilyas I, Little PJ, et al. Endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases and beyond: from mechanism to pharmacotherapies. Pharmacol Rev. 2021;73(3):924‐967.
Not in our library10.1124/pharmrev.120.000096
- 13.
Vinik A, Flemmer M. Diabetes and macrovascular disease. J Diabetes Complications. 2002;16(3):235‐245.
Not in our library10.1016/s1056-8727(01)00212-4
- 14.
Marco M, Valentina I, Daniele M, et al. Peripheral arterial disease in persons with diabetic foot ulceration: a current comprehensive overview. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2021;17(4):474‐485.
Not in our library10.2174/1573399816999201001203111
- 15.
Rahman S, Rahman T, Ismail AA, Rashid AR. Diabetes‐associated macrovasculopathy:pathophysiology and pathogenesis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2007;9(6):767‐780.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1463-1326.2006.00655.x
- 16.
Hotamisligil GS. Inflammation and metabolic disorders. Nature. 2006;444(7121):860‐867.
Not in our library10.1038/nature05485
- 17.
Bandyk DF. The diabetic foot: pathophysiology, evaluation, and treatment. Semin Vasc Surg. 2018;31(2–4):43‐48.
Not in our library10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2019.02.001
- 18.
Callaghan BC, Price RS, Chen KS, Feldman EL. The importance of rare subtypes in diagnosis and treatment of peripheral neuropathy: A review. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(12):1510‐1518.
Not in our library10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.2347
- 19.
Peltier A, Goutman SA, Callaghan BC. Painful diabetic neuropathy [published correction appears in BMJ. 2014;348:g3440]. BMJ. 2014;348:g1799.
Not in our library10.1136/bmj.g1799
- 20.
Yang P, Feng J, Peng Q, Liu X, Fan Z. Advanced glycation end products: potential mechanism and therapeutic target in cardiovascular complications under diabetes. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:9570616‐9570612.
Not in our library10.1155/2019/9570616
- 21.
Viader A, Sasaki Y, Kim S, et al. Aberrant Schwann cell lipid metabolism linked to mitochondrial deficits leads to axon degeneration and neuropathy. Neuron. 2013;77(5):886‐898.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2013.01.012
- 22.
Andersen H. Motor dysfunction in diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012;28(Suppl 1):89‐92.
Not in our library10.1002/dmrr.2257
- 23.
Kamenov ZA, Traykov LD. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;771:176‐193.
Not in our library10.1007/978-1-4614-5441-0_15
- 24.
Molines L, Darmon P, Raccah D. Charcot's foot: newest findings on its pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. Diabetes Metab. 2010;36(4):251‐255.
Not in our library10.1016/j.diabet.2010.04.002
- 25.
Vinik AI, Maser RE, Mitchell BD, Freeman R. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(5):1553‐1579.
Not in our library10.2337/diacare.26.5.1553
- 26.
- 27.
Ma J, Pan P, Anyika M, Blagg BSJ, Dobrowsky RT. Modulating molecular chaperones improves mitochondrial bioenergetics and decreases the inflammatory transcriptome in diabetic SensoryNeurons. ACS Chem Nerosci. 2015;6(9):1637‐1648.
Not in our library10.1021/acschemneuro.5b00165
- 28.
Lupachyk S, Shevalye H, Maksimchyk Y, Drel VR, Obrosova IG. PARP inhibition alleviates diabetes‐induced systemic oxidative stress and neural tissue 4‐hydroxynonenal adduct accumulation: correlation with peripheral nerve function. Free Radic Biol Med. 2011;50(10):1400‐1409.
Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.01.037
- 29.
- 30.
Vincent AM, Hayes JM, McLean LL, Vivekanandan‐Giri A, Pennathur S, Feldman EL. Dyslipidemia‐induced neuropathy in mice: the role of oxLDL/LOX‐1. Diabetes. 2009;58(10):2376‐2385.
Not in our library10.2337/db09-0047
- 31.
Keller JN, Hanni KB, Markesbery WR. Oxidized low‐density lipoprotein induces neuronal death: implications for calcium, reactive oxygen species, and caspases. J Neurochem. 1999;72(6):2601‐2609.
Not in our library10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0722601.x
- 32.
- 33.
Singh VP, Bali A, Singh N, Jaggi AS. Advanced glycation end products and diabeticcomplications. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2014;18(1):1‐14.
Not in our library10.4196/kjpp.2014.18.1.1
- 34.
Court FA, Hendriks WT, MacGillavry HD, Alvarez J, van Minnen J. Schwann cell toaxon transfer of ribosomes: toward a novel understanding of the role of glia in the nervous system. J Neurosci. 2008;28(43):11024‐11029.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.2429-08.2008
- 35.
Yates C, May K, Hale T, et al. Wound chronic‐ity, inpatient care, and chronic kidney disease predispose to MRSA infection in diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1907‐1909.
Not in our library10.2337/dc09-0295
- 36.
Chellan G, Shivaprakash S, Ramaiyar SK, et al. Spectrum and prevalence of fungi infecting deep tissues of lower‐limb wounds in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:2097‐2102.
Not in our library10.1128/jcm.02035-09
- 37.
Berendt AR, Peters EJG, Bakker K, et al. Diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a progress report on diagnosis and a systematic review of treatment. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008;24:S145‐S161.
Not in our library10.1002/dmrr.836
- 38.
Wynn TA, Vannella KM. Macrophages in tissue repair, regeneration, and fibrosis. Immunity. 2016;44(3):450‐462.
Not in our library10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.015
- 39.
Falanga V. Wound healing and its impairment in the diabetic foot. Lancet. 2005;366(9498):1736‐1743.
Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67700-8
- 40.
Baltzis D, Eleftheriadou I, Veves A. Pathogenesis and treatment of impaired wound healing in diabetes mellitus: new insights. Adv Ther. 2014;31(8):817‐836.
Not in our library10.1007/s12325-014-0140-x
- 41.
Davis FM, Kimball A, Boniakowski A, Gallagher K. Dysfunctional wound healing inDiabetic foot ulcers: new crossroads. Curr Diab Rep. 2018;18(1):2.
Not in our library10.1007/s11892-018-0970-z
- 42.
- 43.
Kolaczkowska E, Kubes P. Neutrophil recruitment and function in health and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(3):159‐175.
Not in our library10.1038/nri3399
- 44.
Caielli S, Banchereau J, Pascual V. Neutrophils come of age in chronic inflammation. Curr Opin Immunol. 2012;24(6):671‐677.
Not in our library10.1016/j.coi.2012.09.008
- 45.
Wang Y, Xiao Y, Zhong L, et al. Increased neutrophil elastase and proteinase 3 and augmented NETosis are closely associated with‐cell autoimmunity in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2014;63(12):4239‐4248.
Not in our library10.2337/db14-0480
- 46.
Wong SL, Demers M, Martinod K, et al. Diabetesprimes neutrophils to undergo NETosis, which impairs wound healing. Nat Med. 2015;21(7):815‐819.
Not in our library10.1038/nm.3887
- 47.
Widgerow AD. Chronic wound fluid–thinking outside the box. Wound Repair Regen. 2011;19(3):287‐291.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1524-475x.2011.00683.x
- 48.
Singer AJ, Clark RA. Cutaneous wound healing. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(10):738‐746.
Not in our library10.1056/nejm199909023411006
- 49.
Raja SK, Garcia MS, Isseroff RR. Wound re‐epithelialization: modulating keratinocyte migration in wound healing. Front Biosci. 2007;12:2849‐2868.
Not in our library10.2741/2277
- 50.
- 51.
Lynch MD, Watt FM. Fibroblast heterogeneity: implications for human disease. J ClinInvest. 2018;128(1):26‐35.
Not in our library10.1172/jci93555
- 52.
Dekoninck S, Blanpain C. Stem cell dynamics, migration and plasticity during woundhealing. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21(1):18‐24.
Not in our library10.1038/s41556-018-0237-6
- 53.
Diegelmann RF, Evans MC. Wound healing: an overview of acute, fibrotic and delayed healing. Front Biosci. 2004;9:283‐289.
Not in our library10.2741/1184
- 54.
Catrina SB, Zheng X. Disturbed hypoxic responses as a pathogenic mechanism of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016;32(Suppl 1):179‐185.
Not in our library10.1002/dmrr.2742
- 55.
Desta T, Li J, Chino T, Graves DT. Altered fibroblast proliferation and apoptosis in diabetic gingival wounds. J Dent Res. 2010;89(6):609‐614.
Not in our library10.1177/0022034510362960
- 56.
Ignarro LJ, Buga GM, Wood KS, Byrns RE, Chaudhuri G. Endothelium‐derived relaxing factor produced and released from artery and vein is nitric oxide. Proc Natl AcadSci USA. 1987;84(24):9265‐9269.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.84.24.9265
- 57.
Huang X, Liang P, Jiang B, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen potentiates diabetic wound healing by promoting fibroblast cell proliferation and endothelial cell angiogenesis. Life Sci. 2020;259:118246.
Not in our library10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118246
- 58.
Yu JQ, Liu XF, Chin LK, Liu AQ, Luo KQ. Study of endothelial cell apoptosis using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) biosensor cell line with hemodynamic microfluidic chip system. Lab Chip. 2013;13(14):2693‐2700.
Not in our library10.1039/c3lc50105a
- 59.
Giacco F, Brownlee M. Oxidative stress and diabetic complications. Circ Res. 2010;107(9):1058‐1070.
Not in our library10.1161/circresaha.110.223545
- 60.
Thum T, Fraccarollo D, Schultheiss M, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase uncoupling impairs endothelial progenitor cell mobilization and function in diabetes. Diabetes. 2007;56(3):666‐674.
Not in our library10.2337/db06-0699
- 61.
Ding DC, Shyu WC, Lin SZ. Mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Transplant. 2011;20(1):5‐14.
Not in our library10.3727/096368910x
- 62.
Wang K, Dai X, He J, et al. Endothelial overexpression of metallothionein prevents diabetes‐induced impairment in ischemia angiogenesis through preservation of HIF‐1α/SDF‐1/VEGF signaling in endothelial progenitor cells. Diabetes. 2020;69:1779‐1792.
Not in our library10.2337/db19-0829
- 63.
Kaushik K, Das A. Endothelial progenitor cell therapy for chronic wound tissue regeneration. Cytotherapy. 2019;21:1137‐1150.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jcyt.2019.09.002
- 64.
Wan G, Chen Y, Chen J, et al. Regulation of endothelial progenitor cell functions during hyperglycemia: new therapeutic targets in diabetic wound healing. J Mol Med (Berl). 2022;100(4):485‐498.
Not in our library10.1007/s00109-021-02172-1
- 65.
Wang P, Theocharidis G, Vlachos IS, et al. Exosomes derived from epidermal stem cells improve diabetic wound healing. J Invest Dermatol. 2022;142(9):2508‐2517.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jid.2022.01.030
- 66.
Xu YX, Pu SD, Li X, et al. Exosomal ncRNAs: novel therapeutic target and biomarker for diabetic complications. Pharmacol Res. 2022;178:106135.
Not in our library10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106135
- 67.
Kalluri R, LeBleu VS. The biology function and biomedical applications of exosomes. Science. 2020;367(6478):eaau6977.
Not in our library10.1126/science.aau6977
- 68.
Bosque A, Dietz L, Gallego‐Lleyda A, et al. Comparative proteomics of exosomes secreted by tumoral Jurkat T cells and normal human T cell blasts unravels a potential tumorigenic role for valosin‐containing protein. Oncotarget. 2016;7(20):29287‐29305.
Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.8678
- 69.
He C, Zheng S, Luo Y, Wang B. Exosome Theranostics: biology and translational journal pre‐proof 48 / 59 medicine. Theranostics. 2018;8(1):237‐255.
Not in our library10.7150/thno.21945
- 70.
Shi R, Jin Y, Hu W, et al. Exosomes derived from mmu_circ_0000250‐modified adipose‐derived mesenchymal stem cells promote wound healing in diabetic mice by inducing miR‐128‐3p/SIRT1‐mediated autophagy. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2020;318(5):C848‐C856.
Not in our library10.1152/ajpcell.00041.2020
- 71.
Xu J, Bai S, Cao Y, et al. miRNA‐221‐3p in endothelial progenitor cell‐derived exosomes accelerates skin wound healing in diabetic mice. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020;13:1259‐1270.
Not in our library10.2147/dmso.s243549
- 72.
Lv Q, Deng J, Chen Y, Wang Y, Liu B, Liu J. Engineered human adipose stem‐cell‐derived exosomes loaded with miR‐21‐5p to promote diabetic cutaneous wound healing. Mol Pharm. 2020;17(5):1723‐1733.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00177
- 73.
Wei F, Wang A, Wang Q, et al. Plasma endothelial cells‐derived extracellular vesiclespromote wound healing in diabetes through YAP and the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Aging. 2020;12(12):12002‐12018.
Not in our library10.18632/aging.103366
- 74.
Chen Q, Tang L, Xin G, et al. Oxidative stress mediated by lipid metabolism contributes to high glucose‐induced senescence in retinal pigment epithelium. Free Radic Biol Med. 2019;130:48‐58.
Not in our library10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.10.419
- 75.
Yang HL, Tsai YC, Korivi M, Chang CT, Hseu YC. Lucidone promotes the cutaneous wound healing process via activation of the PI3K/AKT, Wnt/β‐catenin and NF‐κB signaling pathways. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2017;1864:151‐168.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.10.021
- 76.
Jere SW, Houreld NN, Abrahamse H. Role of the PI3K/AKT (mTOR and GSK3β) signalling pathway and photobiomodulation in diabetic wound healing. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2019;50:52‐59.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cytogfr.2019.03.001
- 77.
Zhang E, Gao B, Yang L, Wu X, Wang Z. Notoginsenoside Ft1 promotes fibroblast proliferation via PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway and benefits wound healing in genetically diabetic mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2016;356(2):324‐332.
Not in our library10.1124/jpet.115.229369
- 78.
Xing Y, Lai J, Liu X, et al. Netrin‐1 restores cell injury and impaired angiogenesis in vascular endothelial cells upon high glucose by PI3K/AKT‐eNOS. J Mol Endocrinol. 2017;58(4):167‐177.
Not in our library10.1530/jme-16-0239
- 79.
Clevers H. Wnt/beta‐catenin signaling in development and disease. Cell. 2006;127(3):469‐480.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.018
- 80.
Zhang B, Ma JX. Wnt pathway antagonists and angiogenesis. Protein Cell. 2010;1(10):898‐906.
Not in our library10.1007/s13238-010-0112-0
- 81.
Zhang H, Nie X, Shi X, et al. Regulatory mechanisms of the Wnt/β‐catenin Pathwayin diabetic cutaneous ulcers. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:1114.
Not in our library10.3389/fphar.2018.01114
- 82.
Yamaguchi Y, Passeron T, Hoashi T, et al. Dickkopf 1 (DKK1) regulates skin pigmentation and thickness by affecting Wnt/beta‐catenin signaling in keratinocytes. FASEB J. 2008;22(4):1009‐1020.
Not in our library10.1096/fj.07-9475com
- 83.
Qi W, Yang C, Dai Z, et al. High levels of pigment epithelium‐derived factor in diabetes impair wound healing through suppression of Wnt signaling. Diabetes. 2015;64(4):1407‐1419.
Not in our library10.2337/db14-1111
- 84.
Newman AC, Hughes CC. Macrophages and angiogenesis: a role for Wnt signaling. Vasc Cell. 2012;4(1):13.
Not in our library10.1186/2045-824x-4-13
- 85.
Zhao Y, Ming L, Wei Z, et al. Changes in the expression of Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway in diabetic ulcers. ChinJ Pathophysiol. 2015;17:2033‐2038.
Not in our library
- 86.
Mullin NK, Mallipeddi NV, Hamburg‐Shields E, Ibarra B, Khalil AM, Atit RP. Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway regulates specific lncRNAs that impact dermal fibroblasts and skin fibrosis. Front Genet. 2017;8:183 Published 2017 Nov 21.
Not in our library10.3389/fgene.2017.00183
- 87.
Siebel C, Lendahl U. Notch signaling in development, tissue homeostasis, and disease. Physiol Rev. 2017;97(4):1235‐1294.
Not in our library10.1152/physrev.00005.2017
- 88.
Nicolas M, Wolfer A, Raj K, et al. Notch1 functions as a tumor suppressor in mouse skin. Nat Genet. 2003;33(3):416‐421.
Not in our library10.1038/ng1099
- 89.
Zheng X, Narayanan S, Sunkari VG, et al. Triggering of a Dll4‐Notch1 loop impairs wound healing in diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116(14):6985‐6994.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1900351116
- 90.
Wang YC, He F, Feng F, et al. Notch signaling determines the M1 versus M2 polarization of macrophages in antitumor immune responses. Cancer Res. 2010;70(12):4840‐4849.
Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-0269
- 91.
Feng J, Dong C, Long Y, et al. Elevated Kallikrein‐binding protein in diabetes impairs wound healing through inducing macrophage M1 polarization. Cell Commun Signal. 2019;17(1):60.
Not in our library10.1186/s12964-019-0376-9
- 92.
Wan S, Jiao X, Cao H, Gu Y, Yan L, et al. Advances in understandingthe innate immune‐associated diabetic kidney disease. FASEB J. 2021;35(2):e21367.
Not in our library10.1096/fj.202002334r
- 93.
Dodington DW, Desai HR, Woo M. JAK/STAT ‐ emerging players in metabolism. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2018;29(1):55‐65.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tem.2017.11.001
- 94.
Lee EG, Luckett‐Chastain LR, Calhoun KN, Frempah B, Bastian A, Gallucci RM. Interleukin 6 function in the skin and isolated keratinocytesis modulated by hyperglycemia. J Immunol Res. 2019;2019:5087847.
Not in our library10.1155/2019/5087847
- 95.
Goren I, Linke A, Müller E, Pfeilschifter J, Frank S. The suppressorof cytokine signaling‐3 is upregulated in impaired skin repair: implications for keratinocyte proliferation. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126(2):477‐485.
Not in our library10.1038/sj.jid.5700063
- 96.
- 97.
Jere SW, Houreld NN, Abrahamse H. Photobiomodulation at 660nm stimulates proliferation and migration of diabetic wounded cells via the expression of epidermal growthfactor and the JAK/STAT pathway. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2018;179:74‐83.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.12.026
- 98.
Ghosh S, Karin M. Missing pieces in the NF‐kappaB puzzle. Cell. 2002;109(Suppl):S81‐S96.
Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00703-1
- 99.
Atic R, Deveci E. Endothelin 1, NF‐κB, and ADAM‐15 expression in diabetic foot wounds. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2019;120(1):58‐64.
Not in our library10.4149/bll_2019_009
- 100.
Li C, Yang Z, Zhai C, et al. Maslinic acid potentiates the anti‐tumor activity of tumor necrosis factor alpha by inhibiting NF‐kappaB signaling pathway. Mol Cancer. 2010;9:73.
Not in our library10.1186/1476-4598-9-73
- 101.
- 102.
Sheu ML, Ho FM, Yang RS, et al. High glucose induces human endothelial cell apoptosis through a phosphoinositide 3‐kinase‐regulated cyclooxygenase‐2 pathway. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25(3):539‐545.
Not in our library10.1161/01.atv.0000155462.24263.e4
- 103.
Wang T, He R, Zhao J, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy inhibits inflammationand upregulates activating transcription factor‐3 and downregulates nuclear factor‐κB indiabetic patients with foot ulcerations. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2017;33(4):e2871.
Not in our library10.1002/dmrr.2871
- 104.
Portela A, Esteller M. Epigenetic modifications and human disease. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(10):1057‐1068.
Not in our library10.1038/nbt.1685
- 105.
Jhamb S, Vangaveti VN, Malabu UH. Genetic and molecular basis of diabetic foot ulcers: clinical review. J Tissue Viability. 2016;25(4):229‐236.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jtv.2016.06.005
- 106.
Ishii M, Wen H, Corsa CA, et al. Epigenetic regulation of the alternatively activated macrophage phenotype. Blood. 2009;114(15):3244‐3254.
Not in our library10.1182/blood-2009-04-217620
- 107.
Wang X, Cao Q, Yu L, Shi H, Xue B, Shi H. Epigenetic regulation of macrophage polarization and inflammation by DNA methylation in obesity. JCI Insight. 2016;1(19):e87748 Published 2016 Nov 17.
Not in our library10.1172/jci.insight.87748
- 108.
- 109.
Kimball AS, Joshi A, Carson WF 4th, et al. The histone Methyltransferase MLL1 directs macrophage‐mediated inflammation in wound healing and is altered in a murine model of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2017;66(9):2459‐2471.
Not in our library10.2337/db17-0194
- 110.
De Santa F, Totaro MG, Prosperini E, Notarbartolo S, Testa G, Natoli G. The histoneH3 lysine‐27 demethylase Jmjd3 links inflammation to inhibition of polycomb‐mediated gene silencing. Cell. 2007;130(6):1083‐1094.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.019
- 111.
Fadini GP, Menegazzo L, Rigato M, et al. NETosis delays diabetic wound healing in mice and humans. Diabetes. 2016;65:1061‐1071.
Not in our library10.2337/db15-0863
- 112.
Park LK, Maione AG, Smith A, et al. Genome‐wide DNA methylation analysis identifies a metabolic memory profile in patient‐derived diabetic foot ulcer fibroblasts. Epigenetics. 2014;9(10):1339‐1349.
Not in our library10.4161/15592294.2014.967584
- 113.
Na J, Shin JY, Jeong H, et al. JMJD3 and NF‐κB‐dependent activation of Notch1 gene is required for keratinocyte migration during skin wound healing. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):6494 Published 2017 Jul 26.
Not in our library10.1038/s41598-017-06750-7
- 114.
Ling L, Ren M, Yang C, et al. Role of site‐specific DNA demethylation in TNFα‐induced MMP9 expression in keratinocytes. J Mol Endocrinol. 2013;50(3):279‐290. Published 2013 Apr 12.
Not in our library10.1530/jme-12-0172
- 115.
Tanaka Y, Katagiri Z, Kawahashi K, Kioussis D, Kitajima S. Trithorax‐group protein ASH1 methylates histone H3 lysine 36. Gene. 2007;397(1–2):161‐168.
Not in our library10.1016/j.gene.2007.04.027
- 116.
Li G, Ye Z, Shi C, et al. The histone Methyltransferase Ash1l is required for epidermal homeostasis in mice. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45401.
Not in our library10.1038/srep45401
- 117.
Sawaya AP, Jozic I, Stone RC, et al. Mevastatin promotes healing by targeting caveolin‐1 to restore EGFR signaling. JCI Insight. 2019;4(23):e129320.
Not in our library10.1172/jci.insight.129320
- 118.
Pastar I, Marjanovic J, Liang L, et al. Cellular reprogramming of diabetic foot ulcer fibroblasts triggers pro‐healing miRNA‐mediated epigenetic signature. Exp Dermatol. 2021;30(8):1065‐1072.
Not in our library10.1111/exd.14405
- 119.
Kotwal GJ, Sarojini H, Chien S. Pivotal role of ATP in macrophages fast tracking wound repair and regeneration. Wound Repair Regen. 2015;23(5):724‐727.
Not in our library10.1111/wrr.12323
- 120.
Gallagher KA, Liu ZJ, Xiao M, et al. Diabetic impairments in NO‐mediated endothelial progenitor cell mobilization and homing are reversed by hyperoxia and SDF‐1 alpha. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(5):1249‐1259.
Not in our library10.1172/jci29710
- 121.
Brasacchio D, Okabe J, Tikellis C, et al. Hyperglycemia induces a dynamic cooperativity of histone methylase and demethylase enzymes associated with gene‐activating epigenetic marks that coexist on the lysine tail. Diabetes. 2009;58(5):1229‐1236.
Not in our library10.2337/db08-1666
- 122.
Zhong X, Liao Y, Chen L, et al. The MicroRNAs in the pathogenesis of metabolic memory. Endocrinology. 2015;156(9):3157‐3168.
Not in our library10.1210/en.2015-1063
- 123.
Dangwal S, Stratmann B, Bang C, et al. Impairment of wound healing in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus influences circulating MicroRNA patterns via inflammatory cytokines. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35(6):1480‐1488.
Not in our library10.1161/atvbaha.114.305048
- 124.
Guo J, Dardik A, Fang K, Huang R, Gu Y. Meta‐analysis on the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers with autologous stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8:228
Not in our library10.1186/s13287-017-0683-2.305048147
- 125.
- 126.
Sun X, Fu X, Han W, Zhao Y, Liu H, Sheng Z. Dedifferentiation of human terminally differentiating keratinocytes into their precursor cells induced by basic fibroblast growth factor. Biol Pharm Bull. 2011;34(7):1037‐1045.
Not in our library10.1248/bpb.34.1037
- 127.
Zhang C, Fu X, Chen P, et al. Dedifferentiation derived cells exhibit phenotypic and functional characteristics of epidermal stem cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14(5):1135‐1145.
Not in our library10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00765.x
Cited by papers we hold 1
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.