Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

A Case Study of Measurement Uncertainty in Field Spectroscopy

Andrew J. Walsh, Guy Byrne, Mark Broomhall

IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · 2022

doi:10.1109/jstars.2022.3195120 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

In this article, a novel approach to measuring in situ field uncertainties in surface reflectance is presented. This work is an outcome of a national campaign by Geoscience Australia to validate our analysis-ready Landsat 8 and Sentinel 2 surface reflectance products. Various aspects of the field site methodology that were expected to contribute significantly to uncertainties were identified and tested. These aspects included the instrumental uncertainty, the use of a rest to stabilize the spectroradiometer fore-optic, the repositioning of the panel used for calibrating reflectance, and uncertainties introduced by the operator of the equipment, following a standard methodology. Results for two field sites are presented, which consistently show that approximately 95% of the overall uncertainty is a result of inherent variability in the ground surface reflectance. Typically, 5% of the uncertainty is introduced by a combination of the instrumentation and methodology.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.