A Comparative Study for Localization of Forgery Regions in Images
Mustafa Ozden, Canberk Sahin
IEEE Access · 2025
doi:10.1109/access.2025.3591571 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
As computer technologies and image processing software have advanced, it has become progressively easier to produce simple fake or forged images by altering digital images without leaving any discernible trace. There is a significant need to detect manipulated regions in images in crucial fields such as politics, law, and forensic medicine. In this study, we propose a method that combines the traditional techniques, such as Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) and Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT), with the advantages of deep learning methods to detect manipulated regions in forged images. The proposed method involves designing an architecture where DWT and DCT are used in parallel with DenseNet based Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). To evaluate the effectiveness of this method, we implemented three alternative approaches: one that uses only DCT and CNN, another that uses only DWT and CNN, and a third that employs only CNN without either transformation. In total, four different methods were tested on eight datasets, and their performance was compared using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, dice similarity coefficient, and F1 score. The results from these comparisons clearly indicate the effectiveness and high classification accuracy of the proposed method. By leveraging the combined strengths of traditional image processing techniques and advanced deep learning algorithms, the proposed method demonstrates superior capability in detecting manipulated regions in forged images, thus offering a robust solution for applications in forensic field.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
References55
55 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.