Subject-Independent Classification of Motor Imagery Tasks in EEG Using Multisubject Ensemble CNN
Irina Dolzhikova, Berdakh Abibullaev, Reza Sameni and 1 more
IEEE Access · 2022
doi:10.1109/access.2022.3195513 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Subject-independent (SI) classification is a major area of investigation in Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) that aims to construct classifiers of users’ mental states based on collected electroencephalogram (EEG) of independent subjects. Significant inter-subject variabilities in the EEG are among the most challenging issues in designing SI BCI systems. In this work, we propose and examine the utility of Multi-Subject Ensemble Convolutional Neural Network (MS-En-CNN) for SI classification of motor imagery (MI) tasks. The base classifiers used in MS-En-CNN have a fixed CNN architecture (referred to as DeepConvNet) that are trained using data collected from multiple subjects during the training process. In this regard, training subjects are divided into <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$K$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-folds using which <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$K$ </tex-math></inline-formula> base DeepConvNets are trained based on data from <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$K-1$ </tex-math></inline-formula> folds, whereas the hyperparameter optimization is performed using the held-out fold. We evaluate the performance of the MS-En-CNN on the large open-access MI dataset from the literature, which includes 54 participants and a total number of 21,600 trials. The result shows that the MS-En-CNN achieves the highest single-trial SI classification performance reported on this dataset. In particular, we obtained SI classification performances with average and median accuracies of 85.42% and 86.50% (± 10.16%), respectively. This result exhibits a statistically significant improvement (<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${p} < 0.001$ </tex-math></inline-formula>) over the best previously reported result with an average and a median accuracy of 84.19% and 84.50% (±10.08%), respectively.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.