Unrestricted Attention May Not Be All You Need–Masked Attention Mechanism Focuses Better on Relevant Parts in Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis

Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) is one of the highly challenging tasks in natural language processing. It extracts fine-grained sentiment information in user-generated reviews, as it aims at predicting the polarities towards predefined aspect categories or relevant entities in free text. Previous deep learning approaches usually rely on large-scale pre-trained language models and the attention mechanism, which applies the complete computed attention weights and does not place any restriction on the attention assignment. We argue that the original attention mechanism is not the ideal configuration for ABSA, as for most of the time only a small portion of terms are strongly related to the sentiment polarity of an aspect or entity. In this paper, we propose a masked attention mechanism customized for ABSA, with two different approaches to generate the mask. The first method sets an attention weight threshold that is determined by the maximum of all weights, and keeps only attention scores above the threshold. The second selects the top words with the highest weights. Both remove the lower score parts that are assumed to be less relevant to the aspect of focus. By ignoring part of input that is claimed irrelevant, a large proportion of input noise is removed, keeping the downstream model more focused and reducing calculation cost. Experiments on the Multi-Aspect Multi-Sentiment (MAMS) and SemEval-2014 datasets show significant improvements over state-of-the-art pre-trained language models with full attention, which displays the value of the masked attention mechanism. Recent work shows that simple self-attention in Transformer quickly degenerates to a rank-1 matrix, and masked attention may be another cure for that trend.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.