Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Approximate periodically focused solutions to the nonlinear Vlasov-Maxwell equations for intense beam propagation through an alternating-gradient field configuration

Ronald C. Davidson, Hong Qin, Paul J. Channell

Physical Review Special Topics. Accelerators and Beams · 1999

doi:10.1103/physrevstab.2.074401 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

This paper considers an intense non-neutral ion beam propagating in the z direction through a periodic-focusing quadrupole or solenoidal field with transverse focusing force, -[κ_{x}(s)xe[over ^]_{x}+κ_{y}(s)ye[over ^]_{y}], on the beam ions. Here, s=β_{b}ct is the axial coordinate, (γ_{b}-1)m_{b}c^{2} is the directed axial kinetic energy of the beam ions, and the (oscillatory) lattice coefficients satisfy κ_{x}(s+S)=κ_{x}( s) and κ_{y}(s+S)=κ_{y}( s), where S=const is the periodicity length of the focusing field. The theoretical model employs the Vlasov-Maxwell equations to describe the nonlinear evolution of the distribution function f_{b}(x,y,x^{′},y^{′},s) and the (normalized) self-field potential ψ(x,y,s) in the transverse laboratory-frame phase space (x,y,x^{′},y^{′}). Here, H[over ^](x,y,x^{′},y^{′},s)=(1/2)(x^{′2}+y^{′2})+( 1/2)[κ_{x}( s)x^{2}+κ_{y}(s)y^{2}]+ψ(x,y,s) is the (dimensionless) Hamiltonian for particle motion in the applied field plus self-field configurations, where (x,y) and (x^{′},y^{′}) are the transverse displacement and velocity components, respectively, and ψ(x,y,s) is the self-field potential. The Hamiltonian is formally assumed to be of order ε, a small dimensionless parameter proportional to the characteristic strength of the focusing field as measured by the lattice coefficients κ_{x}(s) and κ_{y}(s). Using a third-order Hamiltonian averaging technique developed by P. J. Channell [Phys. Plasmas 6, 982 (1999)], a canonical transformation is employed that utilizes an expanded generating function that transforms away the rapidly oscillating terms. This leads to a Hamiltonian, H(X[over ̃],Y[over ̃],X[over ̃]^{′},Y[over ̃]^{′},s)=(1/2)(X[over ̃]^{′2}+Y[over ̃]^{′2})+(1/ 2)κ_{f}(X[over ̃]^{2}+Y[over ̃]^{2})+ψ(X[over ̃],Y[over ̃],s), correct to order ε^{3} in the “slow” transformed variables (X[over ̃],Y[over ̃],X[over ̃]^{′},Y[over ̃]^{′}). Here, the transverse focusing coefficient in the transformed variables satisfies κ_{f}=const, and the asymptotic expansion procedure is expected to be valid for a sufficiently small phase advance (σ<π/3=60°, say). Properties of axisymmetric beam equilibrium distribution functions, F_{b}^{0}(H^{0}), with ∂/∂s=0=∂/∂Θ, are calculated in the transformed variables, and the results are transformed back to the laboratory frame. Corresponding properties of the periodically focused distribution function f_{b}(x,y,x^{′},y^{′},s) are calculated correct to order ε^{3} in the laboratory frame, including statistical averages such as the mean-square beam dimensions, 〈x^{2}〉(s) and 〈y^{2}〉( s), the unnormalized transverse beam emittances, ε_{x}(s) and ε_{y}(s), the self-field potential, ψ(x,y,s), the number density of beam particles, n_{b}(x,y,s), and the transverse flow velocity, V_{b}(x,y,s). As expected, the beam cross section in the laboratory frame is a pulsating ellipse for the case of a periodic-focusing quadrupole field or a pulsating circular cross section for the case of a periodic-focusing solenoidal field.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.