Available energy fluxes drive a transition in the diversity, stability, and functional structure of microbial communities

Abstract

A fundamental goal of microbial ecology is to understand what determines the diversity, stability, and structure of microbial ecosystems. The microbial context poses special conceptual challenges because of the strong mutual influences between the microbes and their chemical environment through the consumption and production of metabolites. By analyzing a generalized consumer resource model that explicitly includes cross-feeding, stochastic colonization, and thermodynamics, we show that complex microbial communities generically exhibit a transition as a function of available energy fluxes from a "resource-limited" regime where community structure and stability is shaped by energetic and metabolic considerations to a diverse regime where the dominant force shaping microbial communities is the overlap between species' consumption preferences. These two regimes have distinct species abundance patterns, different functional profiles, and respond differently to environmental perturbations. Our model reproduces large-scale ecological patterns observed across multiple experimental settings such as nestedness and differential beta diversity patterns along energy gradients. We discuss the experimental implications of our results and possible connections with disorder-induced phase transitions in statistical physics.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 55

1. 1.
   A communal catalogue reveals Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity · 2017

   No notice
2. 2.

   Huttenhower C, Gevers D, Knight R, Abubucker S, Badger JH, Chinwalla AT, et al Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 2012;486:207

   Not in our library10.1038/nature11234

3. 3.
   Challenges in microbial ecology: building predictive understanding of community function and dynamics · 2016

   No notice
4. 4.

   Loreau M. Consumers as maximizers of matter and energy flow in ecosystems. The American Naturalist. 1995;145:22

   Not in our library10.1086/285726

5. 5.

   Embree M, Liu JK, Al-Bassam MM, Zengler K. Networks of energetic and metabolic interactions define dynamics in microbial communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015;112:15450

   Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1506034112

6. 6.

   Gause GF, Witt AA. Behavior of Mixed Populations and the Problem of Natural Selection. The American Naturalist. 1935;69:596

   Not in our library10.1086/280628

7. 7.

   MacArthur R. Species Packing and Competitive Equilibrium for Many Species. Theoretical Population Biology. 1970;1:1

   Not in our library10.1016/0040-5809(70)90039-0

8. 8.

   Levin SA. Community equilibria and stability, and an extension of the competitive exclusion principle. The American Naturalist. 1970;104:413

   Not in our library10.1086/282676

9. 9.

   Chesson P. MacArthur’s consumer-resource model. Theoretical Population Biology. 1990;37:26

   Not in our library10.1016/0040-5809(90)90025-q

10. 10.

    Chase JM. Community assembly: when should history matter? Oecologia. 2003;136:489

    Not in our library10.1007/s00442-003-1311-7

11. 11.

    Jeraldo P, Sipos M, Chia N, Brulc JM, Dhillon AS, Konkel ME, et al Quantification of the relative roles of niche and neutral processes in structuring gastrointestinal microbiomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109:9692

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1206721109

12. 12.

    Kessler DA, Shnerb NM. Generalized model of island biodiversity. Physical Review E. 2015;91:042705

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.91.042705

13. 13.
    Stochastic assembly produces heterogeneous communities in the Caenorhabditis elegans intestine · 2017

    No notice
14. 14.

    Bekker A, Holland HD, Wang PL, Rumble D III, Stein HJ, Hannah JL, et al Dating the rise of atmospheric oxygen. Nature. 2004;427:117

    Not in our library10.1038/nature02260

15. 15.
    Cyanobacteria and the Great Oxidation Event: evidence from genes and fossils · 2015

    Corrected
16. 16.

    Jones CG, Lawton JH, Moshe S. Organisms as Ecosystem Engineers. Oikos. 1994;69:373

    Not in our library10.2307/3545850

17. 17.

    Goldford JE, Lu N, Bajić D, Estrela S, Tikhonov M, Sanchez-Gorostiaga A, et al Emergent Simplicity in Microbial Community Assembly. Science. 2018;361:469

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aat1168

18. 18.

    Harcombe WR, Riehl WJ, Dukovski I, Granger BR, Betts A, Lang AH, et al Metabolic Resource Allocation in Individual Microbes Determines Ecosystem Interactions and Spatial Dynamics. Cell Reports. 2014;7:1104

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2014.03.070

19. 19.

    Zomorrodi AR, Segrè D. Synthetic Ecology of Microbes: Mathematical Models and Applications. J Mol Biol. 2016;428:837

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmb.2015.10.019

20. 20.

    Friedman J, Higgins LM, Gore J. Community structure follows simple assembly rules in microbial microcosms. Nature Ecology and Evolution. 2017;1:0109

    Not in our library10.1038/s41559-017-0109

21. 21.

    Taillefumier T, Posfai A, Meir Y, Wingreen NS. Microbial consortia at steady supply. eLife. 2017;6:e22644

    Not in our library10.7554/elife.22644

22. 22.

    Goyal A, Maslov S. Diversity, stability, and reproducibility in stochastically assembled microbial ecosystems. Physical Review Letters. 2018;120:158102

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.120.158102

23. 23.

    Good BH, Martis S, Hallatschek O. Directional selection limits ecological diversification and promotes ecological tinkering during the competition for substitutable resources. bioRxiv. 2018.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1807530115

24. 24.
    Stability criteria for complex microbial communities · 2018

    No notice
25. 25.

    Tikhonov M, Monasson R. Innovation Rather than Improvement: A Solvable High-Dimensional Model Highlights the Limitations of Scalar Fitness. Journal of Statistical Physics. 2018

    Not in our library10.1007/s10955-018-1956-6

26. 26.

    Wigner EP. Characteristic Vectors of Bordered Matrices With Infinite Dimensions. Annals of Mathematics (ser 2). 1955;62:548.

    Not in our library

27. 27.

    May RM. Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 2001.

    Not in our library

28. 28.

    D’Alessio L, Kafri Y, Polkovnikov A, Rigol M. From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics. Advances in Physics. 2016;65:239

    Not in our library10.1080/00018732.2016.1198134

29. 29.

    Fisher CK, Mehta P. The transition between the niche and neutral regimes in ecology. PNAS. 2014;111:13111

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1405637111

30. 30.

    Dickens B, Fisher CK, Mehta P. Analytically tractable model for community ecology with many species. Physical Review E. 2016;94:022423

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.94.022423

31. 31.

    Bunin G. Ecological communities with Lotka-Volterra dynamics. Physical Review E. 2017;95:042414

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.95.042414

32. 32.

    Biroli G, Bunin G, Cammarota C. Marginally stable equilibria in critical ecosystems. New Journal of Physics. 2018;20:083051

    Not in our library10.1088/1367-2630/aada58

33. 33.

    Gibbs T, Grilli J, Rogers T, Allesina S. The effect of population abundances on the stability of large random ecosystems. arXiv. 2017;1708.08837.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.98.022410

34. 34.

    Advani M, Bunin G, Mehta P. Statistical physics of community ecology: a cavity solution to MacArthur’s consumer resource model. Journal of Statistical Mechanics. 2018; p. 033406

    Not in our library10.1088/1742-5468/aab04e

35. 35.

    Barbier M, Arnoldi JF, Bunin G, Loreau M. Generic assembly patterns in complex ecological communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1710352115

36. 36.

    Sunagawa S, Coelho LP, Chaffron S, Kultima JR, Labadie K, Salazar G, et al Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science. 2015;348:1261359

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1261359

37. 37.

    Obadia B, Güvener ZT, Zhang V, Ceja-Navarro JA, Brodie EL, Ja WW, et al Probabilistic Invasion Underlies Natural Gut Microbiome Stability. Current Biology. 2017;27:1999

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.034

38. 38.

    Posfai A, Taillefumier T, Wingreen NS. Metabolic Trade-Offs Promote Diversity in a Model Ecosystem. Physical Review Letters. 2017;118:028103

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.118.028103

39. 39.

    Tikhonov M, Monasson R. Collective Phase in Resource Competition in a Highly Diverse Ecosystem. Physical Review Letters. 2017;118:048103

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.118.048103

40. 40.

    MacArthur R, Levins R. The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species. The American Naturalist. 1967;101:377

    Not in our library10.1086/282505

Cited by papers we hold 3

• Modeling microbial metabolic trade-offs in a chemostat. · 2020
  Not checked
• Microbial coexistence through chemical-mediated interactions · 2019
  No notice
• High-order interactions distort the functional landscape of microbial consortia · 2019
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.