Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 22, 2026.

MTCH2 is a mitochondrial outer membrane protein insertase

Alina Guna, Taylor A. Stevens, Alison J. Inglis and 11 more

Science · 2022

doi:10.1126/science.add1856

Abstract

In the mitochondrial outer membrane, α-helical transmembrane proteins play critical roles in cytoplasmic-mitochondrial communication. Using genome-wide CRISPR screens, we identified mitochondrial carrier homolog 2 (MTCH2), and its paralog MTCH1, and showed that it is required for insertion of biophysically diverse tail-anchored (TA), signal-anchored, and multipass proteins, but not outer membrane β-barrel proteins. Purified MTCH2 was sufficient to mediate insertion into reconstituted proteoliposomes. Functional and mutational studies suggested that MTCH2 has evolved from a solute carrier transporter. MTCH2 uses membrane-embedded hydrophilic residues to function as a gatekeeper for the outer membrane, controlling mislocalization of TAs into the endoplasmic reticulum and modulating the sensitivity of leukemia cells to apoptosis. Our identification of MTCH2 as an insertase provides a mechanistic explanation for the diverse phenotypes and disease states associated with MTCH2 dysfunction.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 22, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Mitochondria are organelles of endosymbiotic origin that have evolved to play a central role in eukaryotic cell metabolism and signaling. Mitochondrial function and their ability to communicate with the cytosol depend on proteins embedded in the outer mitochondrial membrane. As a result, dysregulation of outer membrane protein function is associated with ageing and the pathogenesis of a variety of human diseases including Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and many cancers. In mammals, the insertion of α-helical proteins into the outer membrane, a function that would not have been required in the ancestral endosymbiont, remains poorly understood. In yeast and trypanosomes the mitochondrial import protein 1 (Mim1) and pATOM36, respectively, have been implicated in this process, but no clear homologs exist in mammalian mitochondria. One important class of α-helical outer membrane proteins are tail-anchored proteins (TAs), which are characterized by a single C-terminal transmembrane domain (TMD) and mediate diverse functions including apoptosis, innate immunity, and mitochondrial turnover and dynamics. Therefore, we set out to systematically identify and characterize the factors required for mitochondrial TA biogenesis in human cells.

Using an in vitro competition assay we first showed that TA insertion does not strictly require the TOM complex, the major outer membrane translocase (Fig. 1A, fig. S1–2;). Therefore, to enable CRISPR-based screens, we adapted and validated (Fig. 1B, fig. S3) a split-GFP reporter to measure insertion of the model TA, OMP25, into mitochondria. Amongst hits that increased mitochondrial integration of OMP25 were the ER membrane protein complex (EMC) and the ubiquilin (UBQLN) chaperone family (Fig. 1C; fig. S4A). These results are consistent with the EMC serving as the major insertase for mislocalized mitochondrial TAs into the ER (fig. S4;), and the UBQLNs’ role in degrading mislocalized mitochondrial TAs, leading to their accumulation in the cytosol (fig. S5).

Conversely, depletion of the outer membrane resident mitochondrial carrier homologue 2 (MTCH2) resulted in the most pronounced loss of OMP25 integration (Fig. 1D, fig. S6A). MTCH2 is a member of the solute carrier 25 (SLC25) family, integral membrane proteins best known for their role in transporting metabolites into the mitochondrial matrix, but its localization and sequence suggests its function has potentially diverged, and it has no known substrates or transporter activity. Further, loss of MTCH2 is associated with a variety of pleotropic phenotypes including defects in mitochondrial fusion, lipid homeostasis, and apoptosis. However, the underlying biochemical activity of MTCH2 is not known.

Because of the diverse phenotypes attributed to MTCH2, we excluded the possibility that dysregulation of lipogenesis (fig. S6B,C;), the outer membrane, or general mitochondrial protein biogenesis (Fig. 1E) could explain the observed biogenesis defect on OMP25. We next sought to determine if MTCH2 could be playing a more general role in the biogenesis of other mitochondrial outer membrane proteins. Using a quantitative proteomics strategy, we compared the steady-state levels of endogenous proteins in mitochondria isolated from wildtype or MTCH2 depleted cells (Fig. 2A, fig. S7A, Tables S2–3). We identified several outer membrane α-helical TA, signal anchored, and multipass proteins, that were reproducibly decreased upon loss of MTCH2 (Fig. 2B). Because MTCH2 levels do not appreciably alter the mRNA levels for these proteins (fig. S7C;), we concluded that the effects of MTCH2 on the mitochondrial outer membrane proteome must be occurring post-transcriptionally. To determine if MTCH2 exerts these effects specifically on biogenesis of nascent substrates, we tested a panel of mitochondrial proteins using our fluorescent reporter strategy (Fig. 1B). Consistent with the proteomics, MTCH2 affected the biogenesis of a functionally and biophysically diverse set of TA, signal anchored, and multipass proteins (Fig. 2C, D, fig. S8).

Based on these experiments, we reasoned that MTCH2 may have evolved the ability to insert α-helical proteins into the outer membrane. To test this hypothesis, we focused on TA proteins, because they are the largest class of α-helical outer membrane proteins and adopt a uniform topology. Using an in vitro insertion assay with purified mitochondria (Fig. 3A, fig. S1C, fig. S9), we found that loss of MTCH2 affected the insertion of several mitochondrial TA proteins, but not unrelated intermembrane- or matrix-targeted controls (Fig. 3B, C and fig. S10, fig S11). Further, using site-specific crosslinking (Fig. 3D, Table S4;), we demonstrated that MTCH2 physically associated with nascent substrates during their insertion (Fig. 3E, fig. S12).

Finally, to determine whether MTCH2 is sufficient for TA insertion, we purified MTCH2 (Fig. 3F) and optimized conditions for its reconstitution into liposomes (fig. S13). Using a panel of α-helical substrates, we show that purified MTCH2 specifically stimulated insertion of MTCH2 dependent, but not MTCH2 independent TAs and signal anchored proteins (Fig. 3G, fig. S14). To reconcile these results with earlier observations that trypsin-treated mitochondria remain competent for TA insertion, we found that in contrast to several subunits of the TOM complex, MTCH2 is largely trypsin resistant (Fig. 3H). Cumulatively, the requirement for MTCH2 in vivo and in vitro for TA insertion, together with its reconstituted insertase activity and physical association with substrates, rigorously establishes MTCH2 as an insertase for α-helical mitochondrial outer membrane proteins.

Bioinformatic analysis reveals that in addition to MTCH2, other examples of SLC25 family members lacking canonical sequence motifs are found in both mitochondria and peroxisomes (Fig. 4A, fig. S15). Indeed, depletion of the close paralog MTCH1, which is also localized to the mitochondrial outer membrane, had an additive effect to loss of MTCH2 on biogenesis of many mitochondrial TAs (Fig. 4B, fig. S17). This result is consistent with our genome-wide screen (fig. S17C) and the synthetic lethal relationship between MTCH1 and 2. We therefore propose that MTCH1/2 are the founding members of a unique class of membrane protein insertases that exploit the SLC25 transporter fold (fig. S18).

In contrast to other solute carrier family members, in which the transmembrane helices close to form a pore that allows charged species to cross the membrane, the AlphaFold2 predicted model of MTCH2 contains a prominent groove that is accessible to the membrane and lined with charged and polar residues (Fig. 4C, fig. S19). By introducing mutations at positions that altered the electrostatic potential of its intramembrane surfaces, we identified mutants that both diminish and enhance biogenesis of MTCH2-dependent but not independent substrates (Fig. 4C, fig. S19–20). We therefore concluded that MTCH2’s role in TA insertion relies on a hydrophilic surface within the bilayer.

Given MTCH2’s central role in mitochondrial TA biogenesis, we asked whether it may broadly affect cellular proteostasis. We find that indeed, depletion of MTCH2 leads to an increase in ER insertion of mitochondrial TAs, while MTCH2 overexpression leads to a commensurate decrease in their mistargeting to the ER (Fig. 4D, fig. S21–22). This effect was enhanced by further depleting ATP13A1, an ER dislocase for mislocalized mitochondrial TAs (fig. S21C). These data suggest that MTCH2 is a central ‘gatekeeper’ for the mitochondrial outer membrane: MTCH2 levels and activity dictate the cytosolic reservoir of mitochondrial TAs, which then can be re-routed to the ER if unable to successful integrate into mitochondria (Fig. 4D).

Finally, considering that insertion of several MTCH2-dependent TAs play a central role in apoptosis, we reasoned that MTCH2 activity may affect cellular sensitivity to apoptotic stimuli. To test this, we overexpressed MTCH2 in human K562 cells, which are derived from a myelogenous leukemia cell line known to upregulate the anti-apoptotic TA, BCL2L1. We treated cells with imatinib, a leukemia treatment which targets the BCR-ABL oncogene, and measured apoptosis. We found that while knockout of MTCH2 did not appreciably alter apoptosis propensity in this system, overexpression of wild type MTCH2 markedly sensitizes K562 cells to imatinib treatment (Fig. 4E). Critically, by expressing a series of MTCH2 mutants we found that this sensitization depends on MTCH2’s insertase activity.

In summary, we have demonstrated that MTCH2 is a defining member of a family of membrane protein insertases that are necessary and sufficient for insertion of TAs into human mitochondria. MTCH2’s insertase activity relies on a hydrophilic groove within the bilayer, an apparent example of convergent evolution of many membrane protein translocases including the EMC, Hrd1, and YidC. A significant number of mitochondrial TAs are enriched in basic residues immediately C terminal to their TMDs, and may be particularly reliant on charged surfaces along their route into the membrane. MTCH2’s role also appears to extend to the integration of a broader class of α-helical proteins into the outer membrane, including signal anchored and multipass proteins. Homologs of MTCH2 are present in metazoan peroxisomes and its orthologs are found throughout holozoa, suggesting that the MTCH2 family has co-opted the SLC25 transporter fold to function in diverse biological membranes. The transition from a solute carrier, which mediates transport of small molecules across the membrane, to an insertase appears to have been enabled by the evolution of a membrane accessible hydrophilic groove absent from MTCH2’s SLC25 ancestors.

Previously, loss of MTCH2 has been reported to lead to a diverse range of phenotypes including dysregulation of mitophagy, mitochondrial fragmentation, recruitment of tBID, and altered lipid homeostasis, and was also identified in a recent genome-wide association study for Alzheimer’s disease. The identification of MTCH2 as a key gatekeeper for α-helical outer membrane proteins now provides a molecular explanation for its pleotropic phenotypes, many of which can be directly ascribed to defects in biogenesis of MTCH2 substrates.

References 72

  1. 1.

    Friedman JR, Nunnari J, Mitochondrial form and function. Nature 505, 335 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/nature12985

  2. 2.
  3. 3.

    Bose A, Beal MF, Mitochondrial dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurochem 139 Suppl 1, 216 (2016 ).

    Not in our library10.1111/jnc.13731

  4. 4.

    Vyas S, Zaganjor E, Haigis MC, Mitochondria and Cancer. Cell 166, 555 (2016 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.002

  5. 5.

    N W, N P, Mitochondrial Machineries for Protein Import and Assembly The Annual Review of Biochemistry (2017 ).

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014352

  6. 6.

    Doan KN, The Mitochondrial Import Complex MIM Functions as Main Translocase for α-Helical Outer Membrane Proteins. Cell Rep 31, 107567 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107567

  7. 7.

    Vitali DG, Independent evolution of functionally exchangeable mitochondrial outer membrane import complexes eLife 7, (2018 ).

    Not in our library10.7554/elife.34488

  8. 8.

    Setoguchi K, Otera H, Mihara K, Cytosolic factor- and TOM-independent import of C-tail-anchored mitochondrial outer membrane proteins. EMBO J 25, 5635 (2006 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.emboj.7601438

  9. 9.

    Gilbert LA, Genome-Scale CRISPR-Mediated Control of Gene Repression and Activation. Cell 159, 647 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.029

  10. 10.

    Le Vasseur M, Genome-wide CRISPRi screening identifies OCIAD1 as a prohibitin client and regulatory determinant of mitochondrial Complex III assembly in human cells. Elife 10, e67624 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.7554/elife.67624

  11. 11.

    Coukos R, An engineered transcriptional reporter of protein localization identifies regulators of mitochondrial and ER membrane protein trafficking in high-throughput CRISPRi screens. Elife 10, e69142 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.7554/elife.69142

  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.

    Labbé K, The modified mitochondrial outer membrane carrier MTCH2 links mitochondrial fusion to lipogenesis. J Cell Biol 220, e202103122 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.202103122

  15. 15.

    Rottiers V, MTCH2 is a conserved regulator of lipid homeostasis. Obesity (Silver Spring) 25, 616 (2017 ).

    Not in our library10.1002/oby.21751

  16. 16.

    Zaltsman Y, MTCH2/MIMP is a major facilitator of tBID recruitment to mitochondria. Nat Cell Biol 12, 553 (2010 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/ncb2057

  17. 17.
  18. 18.

    Fry MY, Saladi SM, Cunha A, Clemons WM, Sequence-based features that are determinant for tail-anchored membrane protein sorting in eukaryotes. Traffic 22, 306 (2021 ).

    Not in our library10.1111/tra.12809

  19. 19.

    McKenna MJ, The endoplasmic reticulum P5A-ATPase is a transmembrane helix dislocase. Science 369, eabc5809 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1126/science.abc5809

  20. 20.

    Palmieri F, The mitochondrial transporter family SLC25: identification, properties and physiopathology. Mol Aspects Med 34, 465 (2013 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mam.2012.05.005

  21. 21.

    Shi X, Combinatorial GxGxE CRISPR screen identifies SLC25A39 in mitochondrial glutathione transport linking iron homeostasis to OXPHOS. Nat Commun 13, 2483 (2022 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/s41467-022-30126-9

  22. 22.
  23. 23.

    Benito A, Grillot D, Nuñez G, Fernández-Luna JL, Regulation and Function of Bcl-2 During Differentiation-Induced Cell Death in HL-60 Promyelocytic Cells American Journal of Pathology 146, 481 (1995 ).

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Pleiner T, Structural basis for membrane insertion by the human ER membrane protein complex. Science 369, 433 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1126/science.abb5008

  25. 25.
  26. 26.

    Bai L, You Q, Feng X, Kovach A, Li H, Structure of the ER membrane complex, a transmembrane-domain insertase. Nature 584, 475 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-020-2389-3

  27. 27.

    Wu X, Structural basis of ER-associated protein degradation mediated by the Hrd1 ubiquitin ligase complex. Science 368, eaaz2449 (2020 ).

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aaz2449

  28. 28.

    Kumazaki K, Structural basis of Sec-independent membrane protein insertion by YidC. Nature 509, 516 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/nature13167

  29. 29.

    Rao M, Multiple selection filters ensure accurate tail-anchored membrane protein targeting Elife (2016 ).

    Not in our library10.7554/elife.21301

  30. 30.

    Karch CM, Ezerskiy LA, Bertelsen S, Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics Consortium, A. D. G. C., Goate AM, Alzheimer’s Disease Risk Polymorphisms Regulate Gene Expression in the ZCWPW1 and the CELF1 Loci. PLoS One 11, e0148717 (2016 ).

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0148717

  31. 31.

    Allen M, Late-onset Alzheimer disease risk variants mark brain regulatory loci. Neurol Genet 1, e15 (2015 ).

    Not in our library10.1212/nxg.0000000000000012

  32. 32.

    Escott-Price V, Gene-wide analysis detects two new susceptibility genes for Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One 9, e94661 (2014 ).

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0094661

  33. 33.

    Riggs P, Expression and purification of recombinant proteins by fusion to maltose-binding protein Molecular Biotechnology (2000 ).

    Not in our library10.1385/mb:15:1:51

  34. 34.

    Brambillasca S, Transmembrane topogenesis of a tail-anchored protein is modulated by membrane lipid composition. EMBO J 24, 2533 (2005 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.emboj.7600730

  35. 35.

    Chen JJ, Compromised function of the ESCRT pathway promotes endolysosomal escape of tau seeds and propagation of tau aggregation. J Biol Chem 294, 18952 (2019 ).

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.ra119.009432

  36. 36.

    Jost M, Combined CRISPRi/a-Based Chemical Genetic Screens Reveal that Rigosertib Is a Microtubule-Destabilizing Agent. Mol Cell 68, 210 (2017 ).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2017.09.012

  37. 37.
  38. 38.
  39. 39.

    Cabantous S, Terwilliger TC, Waldo GS, Protein tagging and detection with engineered self-assembling fragments of green fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol 23, 102 (2005 ).

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt1044

  40. 40.
All 72 references

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.