No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 20, 2026.
An increase of inhibition drives the developmental decorrelation of neural activity
Mattia Chini, Thomas Pfeffer, Ileana Hanganu-Opatz
eLife · 2022 · CC BY
Abstract
Throughout development, the brain transits from early highly synchronous activity patterns to a mature state with sparse and decorrelated neural activity, yet the mechanisms underlying this process are poorly understood. The developmental transition has important functional consequences, as the latter state is thought to allow for more efficient storage, retrieval, and processing of information. Here, we show that, in the mouse medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), neural activity during the first two postnatal weeks decorrelates following specific spatial patterns. This process is accompanied by a concomitant tilting of excitation-inhibition (E-I) ratio toward inhibition. Using optogenetic manipulations and neural network modeling, we show that the two phenomena are mechanistically linked, and that a relative increase of inhibition drives the decorrelation of neural activity. Accordingly, in mice mimicking the etiology of neurodevelopmental disorders, subtle alterations in E-I ratio are associated with specific impairments in the correlational structure of spike trains. Finally, capitalizing on EEG data from newborn babies, we show that an analogous developmental transition takes place also in the human brain. Thus, changes in E-I ratio control the (de)correlation of neural activity and, by these means, its developmental imbalance might contribute to the pathogenesis of neurodevelopmental disorders.
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 20, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Introduction
Neural activity in the developing brain has several unique traits, such as discontinuity, extremely low firing rates, a loose temporal coordination of excitation and inhibition, and weak modulation by behavioral state. These patterns of early activity have been described in humans as well as in disparate model organisms ranging from fish to flies, and from rodents to brain organoids. As brain networks mature, they gradually evolve into exhibiting motives with adult-like spatiotemporal properties. Oscillatory events become more rhythmic, increasing their amplitude and average frequency, oscillation patterns become more complex, the ratio of excitatory and inhibitory conductances (E-I ratio) decreases, excitation and inhibition tighten on a temporal scale, and brain activity decorrelates and sparsifies. The relationship between decorrelation and E-I ratio has been the subject of extensive experimental and theoretical work in the adult brain. Decorrelated and sparse activity is a hallmark of adult spike trains and artificial neural networks alike. This activity pattern bears important functional and behavioral relevance, as it allows for efficient storing and retrieval of information, while minimizing energy consumption. However, it is still unknown whether changes in E-I ratio underlie the developmental decorrelation of brain activity. The (patho)physiological relevance of this process is underscored by the hypothesis that altered E-I ratio is the hallmark of later-emerging neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism and schizophrenia, diseases that have also been linked to disruption of correlated activity in animal models.
E-I ratio is controlled by the interplay between pyramidal neurons (PYRs) and interneurons (INs). Throughout development, both populations of neurons migrate into the cortex following an ‘inside-out’ sequence that corresponds to their birthdate. This process is guided by cues provided by PYRs, which populate the cortical layers at an earlier time point than INs. The functional integration of INs into the cortical circuitry is a slow process that is initiated by the establishment of transient circuits. During the first postnatal week, mouse inhibitory circuits are dominated by somatostatin-positive (SST+) INs. At later time points, parvalbumin-positive (PV+) INs are also integrated into local networks. In rodents, the development of inhibitory synapses is not complete until postnatal day (P)30. It is thus conceivable that the developmental strengthening of inhibitory synapses and the ensuing tilting of E-I ratio toward inhibition might underlie the decorrelation of neural activity. In favor of this hypothesis, chronic manipulation of IN activity in the murine barrel cortex results in altered temporal and spatial structure of brain activity. However, direct evidence linking E-I ratio and the strengthening of inhibition with the developmental decorrelation of brain activity is still lacking. Further, it is still debated whether GABA, the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the adult brain, actually exerts an inhibitory effect also during early development. It has long been thought that, in the rodent neocortex, GABA might act as an excitatory neurotransmitter for the first 2 postnatal weeks, and only subsequently ‘switch’ to an inhibitory effect. These findings have been called into question, but the argument remains open.
Here, we combined in vivo extracellular electrophysiological recordings and optogenetics with neural network modeling to systematically explore the relationship between E-I ratio and the decorrelation of neural activity in the developing rodent and human brain. In the murine medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), a brain area where E-I ratio is of particular relevance in the context of neurodevelopmental disorders, we show that GABA inhibits neural activity from the very first postnatal days, and that an increase in the strength of the exerted inhibition progressively decorrelates the prefrontal spike trains. Using neural network modeling and bidirectional optogenetic manipulation of IN activity, we further uncover how the inhibition increase drives the change in the correlation structure. Moreover, in a mouse model of impaired neurodevelopment, we report that excessively low E-I ratio causes impaired spike train correlations. Finally, we investigate two different EEG datasets and illustrate the translational relevance of these findings by providing first insights into analogous developmental processes that take place in newborn babies.
The patterns of prefrontal activity dynamically evolve with age
To investigate the relationship between E-I ratio and the decorrelation of neural activity that occurs throughout development, we interrogated a large dataset (n=117 mice) of multi-site extracellular recordings of local field potential (LFP) and single unit activity (SUA) from the prelimbic subdivision of the mPFC of unanesthetized P2-12 mice (Figure 1A). Across this developmental phase, the LFP evolves from an almost complete lack of activity (silent periods) to uninterrupted (continuous) activity, passing through intermediate stages in which silent periods alternate with bouts of neuronal activity (active periods) (Figure 1A). To quantify this transition, we calculated the proportion of active periods over the recording and found that it monotonically increases over age (age slope = 0.88, 95% CI [0.84; 0.93], p<10–50, generalized linear model) (Figure 1B). The increase in the proportion of active periods resulted from the augmentation of both number and duration of individual active periods until continuous activity was detected (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A-C). Accompanying these high-level changes in activity dynamics, the maximum amplitude of active periods, the broadband LFP power, and the SUA firing rate exponentially increased over age (age slope = 0.24, 0.47, and 0.21, 95% CI [0.18; 0.30], [0.40; 0.53], and [0.15; 0.27], p<10–9, p<10–23, p<10–11, respectively, generalized linear model) (Figure 1C, Figure 1—figure supplement 1D-F).
Changes in the log-log power spectral density (PSD) slope (reflected by the 1/f exponent) have been linked to E-I ratio by several experimental and theoretical studies. In particular, a relative increase in inhibition is thought of leading to a steeper PSD slope (higher 1/f exponent), whereas the opposite occurs when E-I ratio shifts toward excitation. Given that INs have a more protracted integration into cortical circuits than PYRs, this process might be accompanied by a developmental shift of the E-I ratio toward inhibition. In line with this hypothesis, the PSD slope grew steeper over age, as readily observed when the PSD was normalized by the area under the curve (Figure 1D). To quantify this observation, we parameterized the PSDs using a recently published protocol, and confirmed that the 1/f exponent increases with age (age slope = 0.12, 95% CI [0.11; 0.14], p<10–27, linear model) (Figure 1E).
Thus, the monitoring of age-dependent dynamics of prefrontal LFP and SUA let us propose that, throughout development, E-I ratio tilts toward inhibition.
E-I ratio controls pairwise spike train correlations in a neural network model
To explore the relationship between the 1/f exponent, E-I ratio, and the (de)correlation of neuronal spike trains, we simulated a neural network of 400 interconnected conductance-based leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neurons (Figure 2A). In line with anatomical data, 80% of those simulated neurons were excitatory (PYRs), whereas 20% were inhibitory (INs). PYRs were simulated with outgoing excitatory AMPA synapses, while INs were simulated with outgoing inhibitory GABAergic synapses, including recurrent connections for both PYRs and INs. In keeping with theoretical and experimental work, excitatory and inhibitory synaptic weights were simulated with a lognormal distribution. Both neuron types received input noise and PYRs received an additional external excitatory Poisson stimulus with a constant spike rate of 1.5 spikes/s (see Materials and methods for details on the model). We parametrically varied the AMPA and GABA conductances on both PYRs and INs and defined the network’s net inhibition strength as the ratio between the inhibitory and excitatory conductances. The network was simulated for 60 s for each parameter combination. The network’s LFP was defined as the sum of the absolute values of all synaptic currents on PYRs, which was shown to be a reliable proxy of experimental LFP recordings. Across all parameters combinations, INs exhibited higher average firing rates compared to PYRs (INs = 4.06 Hz, 95% CI [3.53; 5.42], PYRs = 1.51 Hz, 95% CI [1.02; 2.98]).
In agreement with previous results, the increase in the network’s net inhibition strength robustly tilted the PSD slope (in the range from 30 to 100 Hz). Increased levels of net inhibition were associated with a steeper decay of power as a function of frequency and a corresponding increase of the 1/f exponent, across a range of AMPA conductance levels (Figure 2B); Pearson correlation coefficient, averaged across AMPA levels (inhibition strength slope = 0.022, 95% CI [0.021; 0.024], linear model). We next examined the effect of increasing the network’s net inhibition strength on neural correlations. To this end, we computed the spike time tiling coefficient (STTC; at a lag of 1 s), a parameter that measures pairwise correlations between spike trains without being biased by firing rate, on the network’s spike matrices (both PYRs and INs) and across all levels of net inhibition strength. For all levels of AMPA conductance, we found that increased net inhibition strength results in a robust logarithmic decrease in STTC (Figure 2C; inhibition strength slope = −0.068, 95% CI [0.075; 0.061], generalized linear model).
Thus, simulations of a biologically plausible neural circuit reveal that increased net inhibition strength leads to an increase of the PSD 1/f exponent that is accompanied by decorrelation of neural spike trains.
Prefrontal spike trains decorrelate over development
Since neural network modeling predicts that a shift of E-I ratio toward inhibition leads to higher 1/f exponent and decorrelation of neural activity, we tested on the experimental data whether the developmental increase in the 1/f exponent in the mouse mPFC was accompanied by a decorrelation of neural activity. For this, we calculated the STTC between >40,000 pairs of spike trains over a large range of lags (2.5 ms to 10 s) (Figure 3A). For the analysis, we only considered SUA that was recorded for at least 60 min. To verify the robustness of STTC as an estimator, we compared the STTC obtained on the first and the second half of the recording. The STTCs computed on the two halves of the recording strongly correlated with each other across all the investigated lags (0.70, [0.50; 0.80] median and min-max Pearson correlation; 0.70 [0.52; 0.79] median and min-max Spearman correlation) (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A-B), thus corroborating its robustness as an estimator. Throughout the manuscript, we will consider STTC computed at 1 s, yet the summary plots and the supplementary statistical table include values calculated at all lags.
Using multivariate mixed hierarchical linear regression, we found that STTC negatively correlated with the distance between neurons (i.e. nearby neurons had higher STTC values than neurons that are far apart) over all the investigated lags (main distance effect, p<10–78 at 1 s lag, linear mixed-effect model) (Figure 3B–D). This is in line with previous studies conducted in the adult and developing brain of several mammalian species. Further, STTC values negatively correlated with age at lags ≤5 s (main age effect, p<10–4 at 1 s lag, linear mixed-effect model), an effect that was strongest in the 100–1000 ms range (Figure 3B and D, Figure 3—figure supplement 1C). This developmental STTC decrease did not occur uniformly across all neuron pairs. Rather, age and distance had a significant interaction, nearby pairs of neurons displaying a more severe decorrelation over age than neurons that were further apart (age*distance interaction, p<10–12 at 1 s lag, linear mixed-effect model) (Figure 3B–D).
Taken together, these data indicate that, throughout development, as E-I ratio tilts toward inhibition, there is a concomitant decorrelation of pairwise neuronal activity computed over lags that span more than three orders of magnitude. This result is in agreement with data from the rodent barrel cortex. In addition, we report that this process follows a specific spatial pattern, with the activity of nearby neurons being the most affected.
Optogenetic IN manipulation confirms developmental increase of inhibition
To substantiate the experimental evidence supporting the developmental increase of inhibition in the mouse mPFC, we optogenetically manipulated IN activity at different stages of early development. To this aim, we selectively transfected Dlx5/6cre and Gad2cre INs with either an excitatory (ChR2, n=19 mice) or an inhibitory opsin (ArchT, n=40 mice) using a combination of mouse lines and viral approaches. Briefly, expression of an excitatory opsin in INs was achieved by injecting P0-1 Dlx5/6cre and Gad2cre mice with a virus encoding for ChR2 (AAV9-Ef1alpha-DIO-hChR2(ET/TC)-eYFP). Expression of an inhibitory opsin was instead achieved by crossing Dlx5/6cre and Gad2cre mice with a mouse line (Ai40(RCL-ArchT/EGFP)-D) expressing ArchT under a cre-dependent promoter. No significant differences between experiments targeting Dlx5/6cre and Gad2cre neurons were detected and therefore, the datasets were pooled. In line with previously developed protocols, we applied a 3-s-long ‘ramp-like’ optogenetic stimulation of increasing intensity (Figure 4A, Figure 4—figure supplement 1A).
IN activation led to conspicuous modulation of SUA across all investigated ages. Upon stimulus, a small number of neurons (putative INs) gradually increased their firing rate (Figure 4B). The proportion of stimulated INs was similar among mouse lines (main mouse line effect, p=0.14, generalized linear mixed-effect model) and across ages (main age effect = 0.14, 95% CI [–0.04; 0.34], p=0.12, generalized linear mixed-effect model) (Figure 4—figure supplement 1B; individual dots correspond to optogenetic stimulation protocols, see figure legend and Materials and methods). This is in line with the histological quantification of the number of virally transfected neurons that led to similar results for all mouse lines (main mouse line effect, p=0.45, linear mixed-effect model) and developmental stages (main age effect = −1.35, 95% CI [–3.22; 0.51], p=0.18, linear mixed-effect model) (Figure 4—figure supplement 1C). While putative INs increased their firing rate in response to optogenetic stimulation, a larger proportion of neurons (putative PYRs) significantly decreased their firing rate (Figure 4B). In line with the results above that indicated increasing inhibition throughout development, the proportion of inhibited neurons augmented with age (main age effect = 0.31, 95% CI [0.09; 0.55], p=0.005, generalized linear mixed-effect model) (Figure 4C; individual dots correspond to optogenetic stimulation protocols, see figure legend and Materials and methods). These results are unlikely to be biased by a ‘floor effect’ due to the low firing rate of neurons in the youngest mice, as limiting the analysis to neurons in the top 50% for spikes fired during the optogenetic protocol yielded an even stronger effect (main age effect = 0.47, 95% CI [0.17; 0.81], p=0.002, generalized linear mixed-effect model) (Figure 4—figure supplement 1D; individual dots correspond to optogenetic stimulation protocols, see figure legend and Materials and methods). Regardless of age, after terminating the optogenetic stimulus, PYRs responded with a prominent ‘rebound’ increase in firing rate, similar to the effects reported for the adult brain. Such widespread inhibition upon IN stimulation supports the hypothesis that GABA exerts an inhibitory population-level effect already during the first postnatal days.
To dissect the main ‘neuronal trajectories’ in response to light stimulation, we performed principal component analysis (PCA) on trial-averaged smoothed and normalized spike trains and projected the time-varying activity of neurons onto a low-dimensional space. The two principal components captured two populations of neurons that, during optogenetic stimulation, responded with a monotonic decrease (first component) and increase (second component) in firing rate (Figure 4D). While opto-tagging at such an early age is not possible, we hypothesize that the first component corresponds to inhibited PYRs and the second one to INs that were activated with the optogenetic stimulus. Interestingly, the two dynamics were strikingly similar across age groups (Figure 4D).
To corroborate this hypothesis, we carried out a series of simulations in a LIF neural network model analogous to the one previously described. To mimic the ‘ramp-like’ optogenetic stimulation, we injected INs with repeated sweeps of an excitatory current with the same temporal profile (3 s of stimulation of increasing intensity) (Figure 4—figure supplement 1E). The model confirmed that, similarly to the neuronal trajectory described by the first PCA component, PYRs decreased their firing rate in response to the stimulation, while INs responded with an increase in firing rate that is analogous to the neuronal trajectory described by the second PCA component (Figure 4—figure supplement 1F). To test the role played by inhibition in generating the population dynamics, we systematically varied the reversal potential (Vrev) driving the inhibitory post-synaptic currents. Vrevs that were higher than the action potential threshold (Vthr) (excitatory GABA) between the resting membrane potential (Vrest) and the Vthr (depolarizing GABA) or equal to Vrest resulted in runaway excitation and average firing rates within 100–1000 Hz range (Figure 4—figure supplement 1G). Vrev that were at least 5 mV lower than the Vrest resulted in stable networks, but only Vrevs that were 10 mV or lower than Vrest were able to fully recapitulate the experimentally observed population trajectories (Figure 4—figure supplement 1H).
Taken together, these data indicate that, while the inhibition strength exerted by INs increases throughout development, the dynamics with which the PYR-IN network responds to IN activation does not change across the first 2 postnatal weeks. These data also provides support to the notion that, on a network level, GABA exerts an inhibitory effect already during the first postnatal week.
To further corroborate these results, we carried out analogous experiments in mice expressing an inhibitory opsin in INs (Figure 5A, Figure 4—figure supplement 1A).
Light-induced IN silencing resulted in a widespread progressive increase of firing, with very few inhibited neurons (12/1611 neurons) (Figure 5B). Independent of age group, the increased firing abruptly returned to baseline levels upon terminating the optogenetic stimulus (Figure 5B). The proportion of neurons responding with a firing rate increase during IN inhibition augmented with age (main age effect = 0.54, 95% CI [0.37; 0.74], p<10–8, generalized linear model) (Figure 5C; individual dots correspond to optogenetic stimulation protocols, see figure legend and Materials and methods). To qualitatively compare the ‘neuronal trajectories’, we performed trial-averaged PCA. The first component, that captured the activity of putative PYRs, responded to the light stimulus with a monotonic rise of firing rate that quickly dropped as soon as the stimulus stopped (Figure 5D). On the contrary, and in line with previous experimental and theoretical work in the adult brain, putative INs (the trajectory captured by the second component), had a biphasic response. They were initially inhibited but, halfway through the optogenetic stimulation, displayed a steep increase in firing rate, that persisted until end of the stimulus (Figure 5D). This response pattern is typical for inhibition-stabilized networks (ISNs), a regime at which adult cortical circuits operate, and that has been suggested to not characterize the early developing brain.
To corroborate the experimental findings of putative PYRs’ and INs’ temporal dynamics, we carried out a series of simulations in a LIF neural network model. To mimic the ‘ramp-like’ optogenetic inhibition of INs, we injected this population of neurons with repeated sweeps of an inhibitory current with the same temporal profile (3 s of stimulation of increasing intensity) (Figure 5E). The model confirmed that, similarly to the neuronal trajectory described by the first PCA component, PYRs monotonically increased their firing rate in response to the IN inhibition (Figure 5F). INs had a biphasic response analogous to the one described by the second PCA component. They initially decreased their firing rate and then, halfway through the ramp stimulation, robustly increased their firing rate (Figure 5F). To test the role of inhibition in generating the population dynamics, we systematically varied the Vrev driving the inhibitory post-synaptic currents. Analogously to what has been previously shown, excitatory and depolarizing GABA both resulted in runaway excitation and average firing rates that were in the 100–1000 Hz range (Figure 4—figure supplement 1I). Vrev that were at least 5 mV lower than Vrest resulted in stable networks, but only Vrev that were 10 mV or lower than Vrest were able to fully recapitulate the population trajectories that we experimentally observed (Figure 4—figure supplement 1J).
Thus, while the network excitation derived from IN inhibition increased throughout development, the dynamics with which the PYR-IN network responds to IN inhibition did not change during the first 2 postnatal weeks. These data further support the conclusion that, on a network level, GABA exerts an inhibitory effect already in the first postnatal week.
We have previously shown that the optogenetic paradigm that we utilized does not lead to significant tissue heating, but to further rule out possible nonspecific effects, we applied the same stimulation paradigm to cre- mice (n=10 mice, 380 neurons, Figure 4—figure supplement 2A). Pooling together all investigated mice, only 6 out of 380 units were activated, whereas none was inhibited. These results are in line with the statistical threshold (0.01) that was used for this analysis (proportion of modulated units 0.016, CI [0.007; 0.034], Figure 4—figure supplement 2B). Thus, the used light stimulation leads to minimal non-significant, if any, unspecific modulation of neuronal firing.
Taken together, these data show that optogenetic manipulation of INs robustly affects the neonatal prefrontal network in an age-dependent manner. Stimulating INs induced widespread inhibition of putative PYRs, whereas the contrary was true after IN inhibition. Both effects augmented with age. However, the ability of INs to control the cortical inhibition did not qualitatively change during the first 2 postnatal weeks, resembling adult patterns. These data provide evidence against the long-standing hypothesis of network-level excitatory effects of GABA in the developing mouse cortex.
Optogenetic manipulation of IN activity impacts pairwise spike train correlations
To investigate the relationship between age-dependent dynamics of inhibition and decorrelation of spike trains, we compared STTC before IN optogenetic manipulation (STTCpre) to STTC during optogenetic manipulation (STTCstim). Considering that STTCpre and STTCstim could only be computed in 3 s epochs (times the number of trials), we first verified whether STTCpre was a good predictor of ‘baseline’ STTC. Pooling across mice and different IN manipulations, STTCpre robustly correlated with baseline STTC across every investigated lag, from 2.5 ms to 1 s (0.66, [0.48; 0.72] median and min-max Pearson correlation; 0.68 [0.40; 0.71] median and min-max Spearman correlation) (Figure 6—figure supplement 1A-B). Further, STTCstim exhibited lower correlation values with baseline STTC across all lags, a first hint that optogenetic IN manipulation affected STTC (Figure 6—figure supplement 1A-B).
As predicted by the experimental and modeling results, optogenetic modulation of IN activity affected the STTC values across all investigated timescales (Figure 6A–B, Figure 6—figure supplement 1C). IN stimulation resulted in decreased STTC values (main IN stimulation effect, p<10–71, 1 s lag, linear mixed-effect model) (Figure 6A). On the other hand, IN inhibition increased STTC (main IN inhibition effect, p<10–286, 1 s lag, linear mixed-effect model) (Figure 6B). Moreover, in line with the strongest decorrelation along development for nearby neurons (Figure 3D), IN modulation had a larger impact on STTC values of nearby neurons when compared to pairs that are further apart (IN stimulation*distance interaction, p=2*10–4; IN inhibition*distance interaction p<10–5, 1 s lag, linear mixed-effect model) (Figure 6C–D).
Thus, these data indicate that IN manipulation causally impacts pairwise correlations between spike trains. The effect of IN manipulation increases with age, in agreement with the notion that inhibition strengthens throughout development.
Mice with altered developmental E-I ratio have excessively decorrelated activity
Developmental imbalances in E-I ratio have been linked to the pathophysiology of neurodevelopmental disorders. A corollary of the results above is that impaired developmental E-I ratio should result in altered correlation levels of neuronal activity. To test this hypothesis, we interrogated an open-source dataset that we recently published. The dataset was obtained from extracellular recordings of SUA from the mPFC of P4-10 control and dual-hit genetic-environmental (GE) mice. GE mice mimic the etiology (combined disruption of Disc1 gene and maternal immune activation) and cognitive impairment of schizophrenia, showing already at neonatal age reduced excitatory activity in the superficial layers of the mPFC (;; Figure 7A). On the flipside, deep layers of the mPFC are not affected. Therefore, we hypothesized that GE mice have lower STTC values than controls (i.e. mice lacking the abnormal genetic background and influence of environmental stressor). Considering the layer specificity of the deficits identified in the mPFC of GE mice, we reasoned that this effect should be present in spike trains from neurons in the superficial layers. Overall, GE mice had lower spike train correlations when compared to controls (main condition effect, p=0.032, 1 s lag, linear mixed-effect model) (Figure 7—figure supplement 1A). In line with the proposed hypothesis, this deficit depended on whether the neuron pair was situated in the superficial or deep layers of the mPFC (condition*layer interaction, p<10–7, 1 s lag, linear mixed-effect model). While there was no significant difference between STTC of controls and GE spike train pairs situated in the deep layers (p=0.15, 1 s lag, linear mixed-effect model), spike train pairs of GE mice in which one of the two neurons was located in the superficial layers had reduced STTC values (p=0.016, 1 s lag). This difference was even more robust if both neurons were situated in the superficial layers (p=10–3, 1 s lag) (Figure 7B–D). Last, the effect did not depend on the age of the mouse (condition*age interaction, p=0.16, 1 s lag, linear mixed-effect model) (Figure 7—figure supplement 1A-B).
Taken together, these data support the hypothesis that decreased developmental E-I ratio results in reduced spike train pairwise correlations. Further, we show that this effect is remarkably specific. In GE mice, a mouse model characterized by reduced excitatory drive in prefrontal PYRs of the superficial layers, the reduced correlation levels were largely limited to spike train pairs involving PYRs of the superficial layers.
E-I ratio decreases with age in newborn babies
Considering the role of E-I ratio for neurodevelopmental disorders, it is of critical relevance to assess whether a developmental strengthening of inhibition occurs also in humans. To this aim, we interrogated two EEG datasets recorded in newborn babies of an age between 35 and 46 post-conception weeks (PCW), a stage of brain development that is roughly equivalent to the one that we studied in mice. While it is not straightforward to compare intracranial recordings from a deep structure like the mouse mPFC to human EEG data, to maximize the consistency between approaches, we limited our analysis to channels from the frontal derivations of the EEG (Figure 8A).
The first dataset consisted of 1100 EEG recordings from sleeping babies with an age comprised between 36 and 45 PCW. Similar to the PSDs of recordings from the neonatal mice mPFC, the PSD slope grew steeper over age (Figure 8—figure supplement 1A), a phenomenon that was readily apparent after normalization of the PSD (Figure 8B). We quantified the 1/f exponent on the 1–20 Hz frequency range and confirmed that it increased with age (age coefficient = 0.26, 95% CI [0.24; 0.27], p<10–183, linear model) (Figure 8C). A second dataset consisted of EEG recordings from 42 sleeping babies, recorded at 40 and 43 PCW. The analyses revealed that also for these data the PSD slope grew steeper (Figure 8—figure supplement 1B-C) and the 1/f exponent increased with age (age coefficient = 0.30, 95% CI [0.17; 0.42], p<10–4, linear mixed-effect model) (Figure 8D). The increase in 1/f slope over age was very similar across the two different datasets (mean age coefficients = 0.26 and 0.30) and no statistical difference was found between them (main dataset effect, p=0.15; age*dataset interaction, p=0.21, linear mixed-effect model) (Figure 8E).
Thus, the E-I ratio decreases along development also in newborn humans. This feature might represent a fingerprint of cortical circuit maturation in mammalian species.
Discussion
Integration of INs into the cortical circuitry has been proposed to bear important structural, functional, and behavioral consequences. Here, we show that, even though INs inhibit neuronal activity already in the first postnatal week, the relative strength of the exerted inhibition increases with age, leading to a decrease of E-I ratio. This developmental process contributes to a transition in brain dynamics from early highly synchronous activity patterns to decorrelated neural activity later in life. We further show that an early imbalance in E-I ratio in the mPFC results in altered temporal neural dynamics. Last, leveraging two EEG datasets recorded in newborn babies, we provide evidence for analogous developmental processes taking place in the human cortex.
Inhibitory synaptogenesis is an exquisitely specific process that is orchestrated by distinct molecular programs and neural activity. Its timeline is protracted and it extends to early adulthood in the mouse somatosensory cortex. PYRs are thought of playing an instructive role in this process, by providing molecular cues guiding IN migration and by regulating their survival in an activity-dependent manner. Inhibitory circuits during the first postnatal week have several peculiarities, including a predominance of inhibitory synapses by SST+ INs and the presence of hub neurons that control the formation of functional assemblies. One of the unique traits of early inhibitory circuits that has garnered much attention is the hypothesis that GABA might act as an excitatory neurotransmitter. This excitatory action of GABA has been most intensively investigated at single-cell level and has been proposed to result from the low expression of KCC2, a potassium chloride cotransporter extruding chloride, which leads to high intracellular chloride concentration in immature neurons. The ‘GABA-switch’ from an excitatory to inhibitory neurotransmitter has been suggested to take place between the first and the second postnatal week. Refuting this hypothesis, recent studies have shown that, already during the first postnatal week, GABAergic transmission, while depolarizing on single neurons, exerts an inhibitory action on population activity. In line with this latter interpretation, the present study provides SUA-level evidence of the inhibitory effect of GABA in vivo already in the first postnatal days. This is of particular interest considering that the PFC is a brain area whose development is thought of being more protracted than sensory areas, where the early effects of GABA have been more intensively studied. We show that optogenetic inhibition of cortical INs results in a widespread increase of SUA firing rates and, conversely, increasing their activity leads to a reduction of neuronal activity. While the strength of the inhibition exerted by INs increases throughout development, the network effects generated by INs do not qualitatively change with age. Already during the first postnatal week, optogenetic inhibition of INs leads to a paradoxical increase in their firing rate. This dynamics is characteristic of ISNs that have a high degree of recurrent inhibition, a regime that has been proposed to emerge at later developmental phases. Here, we find experimental and computational evidence that the mPFC might operate in an ISN regime already shortly after birth. Neural network modeling suggests that this is only possible in the presence of a strong hyperpolarizing chloride drive at inhibitory synapses. Of note, we only observed a paradoxical effect, the signature of ISN networks, in response to optogenetic inhibition and not stimulation of INs. This apparent discrepancy is most likely the result of the approach that we employed to express an inhibitory opsin in INs. The combination of two mouse lines (see Materials and methods) targeted a larger proportion of neurons than the approach that combined a mouse line with viral injections (see Materials and methods) and has been used to express the inhibitory opsin. The proportion of activated/inhibited neurons is a critical factor in determining whether a paradoxical response is elicited. Similar discrepancies between the two different targeting approaches have been previously reported for the adult cortex. Further, in neural network models, the paradoxical effect is more readily observed in response to IN inhibition than IN stimulation. Thus, while the effects of GABA might differ within brain regions, our data supports the notion that, in the mPFC, GABA has an inhibitory role already at P2 and that even in the first postnatal days, the cortex operates in an ISN regime.
As the brain develops and inhibitory synaptogenesis progresses, the temporal coordination between excitatory and inhibitory transmission tightens with a relative strengthening of inhibition with respect to excitation (i.e. a decrease in E-I ratio). While E-I ratio is thought of being a critical feature of healthy neural networks, the functional consequences of the developmental E-I ratio decrease are still poorly understood. Individually, E-I ratio imbalances and altered correlational structure of brain activity have both been linked to mental disorders. Studying how these two processes are linked to each other is therefore likely to be insightful for understanding the pathophysiology of these disorders. To address this knowledge gap, we explored the impact of varying E-I ratio in a biologically plausible neural network model. In line with previous results, we show that E-I ratio can be indirectly tracked by measuring the 1/f exponent, a notion that we leveraged to show that there is an E-I ratio decrease in the mouse and human mPFC. We further show that, in a neural network model, a relative increase in inhibition results in decreased pairwise correlations of spike trains. Confirming the modeling results, we report that, in the mouse mPFC, the inferred E-I ratio decrease taking place across the first two postnatal weeks is accompanied by a reduction in pairwise spike trains correlations, as previously described in sensory cortices. To further strengthen the link between the two processes, we bidirectionally manipulated the activity of prefrontal INs by light. In line with our hypothesis, optogenetic stimulation of INs (i.e. decreasing E-I ratio) results in reduced correlations among spike trains. Conversely, optogenetic inhibition of INs (i.e. increasing E-I ratio) increases correlations among spike trains. IN inhibition results in increased spike train correlations even though, in the last portion of the optogenetic protocol, IN displays a paradoxical increase in firing rate. This might indicate that even a transient reduction in inhibition strength might be sufficient to increase neural correlations. Both the age-dependent as well as IN manipulation-induced effects on activity correlations do not impact all spike train pairs in a uniform manner. Rather, neuron pairs that are close to each other are more severely affected than those that are farther apart. While an IN subtype-specific dissection of the mechanisms accounting for neural activity decorrelation is beyond the scope of this study, this effect might be explained by the fact that PV+ INs preferentially provide local inhibition and have a particularly protracted integration into the prefrontal cortical circuitry. PV+ INs generally provide inhibition at the soma and the axon initial segment, a position that is particularly suited to inhibit the spiking output of PYRs and thereby reduce pairwise spiking correlations. The progressive embedment of PV+ INs in the rodent prefrontal circuitry has also been suggested to be responsible for the increase in the average frequency of the LFP oscillations that are generated by layer 2/3 PYRs. Future studies might shed light on whether this process is related to the decorrelation of brain activity.
In the adult brain and modern artificial neural networks, most neurons are only sparsely active and correlations between neurons are low. The relationship between correlations, network activity, and behavioral performance is complex and has been reviewed elsewhere. Briefly, correlated activity has been proposed as limiting the amount of information that can be encoded and as being energy-inefficient. Conversely, theoretical and experimental work has shown that correlated neural activity can also enhance the robustness of information transmission. In sensory cortices, the decorrelated adult activity patterns result from a developmental sparsification process. Along the same lines, neural activity has also been shown to become less global and more local throughout development. Here, we describe that a similar transition also occurs in a higher-order brain area such as the mPFC. Several non-mutually exclusive mechanisms underlying this phenomenon have been proposed, such as a transition in synaptic plasticity rules, changes in NMDA receptor composition, a decrease in the input resistance of neurons, or a combination of these. Here, we propose that an increase in inhibition also plays a role in the decorrelation of neural activity.
Further, we show that the 1/f exponent derived from LFP recorded from the mouse mPFC increases along the first two postnatal weeks. Similarly, the 1/f exponent derived from the frontal derivations of EEG recorded from human babies increases between the 36th and the 45th PCW (from ~2 weeks preterm birth to ~7 weeks after birth, when considering 38 weeks as the average length of human pregnancy; ). This is the opposite of processes taking place in aging, between childhood and adulthood, and even from the 1st to the 7th month of life. The decline in the 1/f exponent (indicative of increased E-I ratio) occurring between childhood and elderliness can be explained by the decline of brain GABA levels and cortical inhibition. This is however unlikely to explain the discrepancy between the current study and the effect reported for babies of 1–7 months of age, an age range that borders the one that we investigated. In age-matched mice, a wave of interneuronal cell death takes place around this age and might induce an early shift from E-I ratio decrease to E-I ratio increase. Whether a similar process occurs in humans too and might explain the discrepancy between the two studies is still unknown and, due to the ethical and technical limitations of invasive recordings in humans, difficult to address. Directly investigating pairwise spike train correlations is not feasible without resorting to invasive intracranial recordings. It is however noteworthy that, albeit at a different spatial and temporal resolution, the density of phase and amplitude EEG spatial correlations decreases between the last trimester of pregnancy and the first weeks of life. Importantly, an impaired structure of frontal correlations at birth, such as the one induced by birth prematurity, is predictive of impaired neurological performance. Future work should address whether changes in E-I ratio also underlie the developmental maturation of these high-level EEG spatial correlations.
Several studies have reported E-I imbalances in the mPFC of mouse models of mental disorders and in patients affected by these diseases. Following this stream of evidence, we investigated a dataset previously obtained from in vivo electrophysiological recordings from the mPFC of a mouse mimicking the etiology of schizophrenia, generated by combining two mild stressors, a genetic and an environmental one. Their synergistic combination results in severe deficits affecting PYRs that reside in the superficial layers of the mPFC. These neurons display a simplified dendritic arborization, a severe reduction in spine density and firing rate. Thus, GE mice have a reduced E-I ratio in the mPFC superficial layers, which leads to diminished STTC values among spike trains. While in sensory areas correlation might limit information carrying capacity, in associative brain areas, like the mPFC, correlations are thought of improving signal readout, and increased correlations have been linked to improved behavioral performance. This data support the hypothesis that imbalances in E-I ratio might be a possible unifying framework for understanding the circuit dysfunction characterizing neuropsychiatric disorders. In this perspective, it is relevant that the development of E-I ratio can also be quantified, albeit indirectly, also from EEG recordings of newborn babies. The fact that two different EEG datasets yield similar estimations for the age-dependent changes in the 1/f exponent supports the notion that this parameter might be a robust biomarker of E-I ratio development with potential translational relevance.
Data and code availability
LFP and SUA data that were newly generated for this study are available at the following open-access repository: https://gin.g-node.org/mchini/development_EI_decorrelation.
Code supporting the findings of this study is available at the following open-access repository: https://github.com/mchini/Chini_et_al_EI_decorrelation;.
Experimental models and subject details
All experiments were performed in compliance with the German laws and following the European Community guidelines regarding the research animals use. All experiments were approved by the local ethical committee (G132/12, G17/015, N18/015). Experiments were carried out on C57BL/6J, Dlx5/6-Cre (Tg(dlx5a-cre)1Mekk/J, Jackson Laboratory), Gad2-IRES-Cre (Gad2tm2(cre)Zjh, Jackson Laboratory), and ArchT (Ai40(RCL-ArchT/EGFP)-D, Jackson Laboratory) mice of both sexes. Mice were housed in individual cages on a 12 hr light/12 hr dark cycle, and were given access to water and food ad libitum. The day of birth was considered P0. To inhibit IN activity, mice from the Dlx5/6-Cre and Gad2-IRES-Cre driver lines were crossed with mice from the ArchT reporter line. To stimulate IN activity, P0-P1 mice from the Dlx5/6-Cre and Gad2-IRES-Cre driver lines were injected in the mPFC with a virus encoding for ChR2 (AAV9-Ef1alpha-DIO-hChR2(ET/TC)-eYFP) as previously described. Details on the data acquisition and experimental setup of open-access datasets that were used in this project have been previously published.
Surgery
In vivo extracellular recordings were performed from the prelimbic subdivision of the mPFC of non-anesthetized P2-12 mice. Before starting with the surgical procedure, a local anesthetic was applied on the mice neck muscles (0.5% bupivacain/1% lidocaine). The procedure was carried out under isoflurane anesthesia (induction: 5%; maintenance: 1–3%, lower for older pups, higher for younger pups). Neck muscles were cut to reduce muscle artifacts. A craniotomy over the mPFC (0.5 mm anterior to bregma, 0.1–0.5 mm lateral to the midline) was performed by first carefully thinning the skull and then removing it with the use of a motorized drill. Mice were head-fixed into a stereotactic frame and kept on a heated (37°C) surface throughout the entire recording. (Opto)Electrodes (four-shank, 4×4 recording sites, 100 µm between recording sites, 125 µm shank distance; NeuroNexus, Ann Arbor, MI) were slowly inserted into the prelimbic cortex, at a depth varying between 1.4 and 2 mm depending on the age of the mouse. A silver wire implanted into the cerebellum was used as ground and external reference. Before signal acquisition, mice were allowed to recover for 30–45 min, to maximize the quality and stability of the recording as well as single units yield.
Signal acquisition
Extracellular signals were acquired and digitized at a 32 kHz sampling rate after band-pass filtering (0.1–9000 Hz) using an extracellular amplifier (Digital Lynx SX; Neuralynx, Bozeman, MO, Cheetah, Neuralynx, Bozeman, MO).
Optogenetic stimulation
Optical stimuli were delivered by an Arduino Uno-controlled (Arduino, Italy) diode laser (Omicron, Austria). The delivered light stimuli varied in wavelength (472 or 594 nm) according to the experimental paradigm (IN stimulation and inhibition, respectively). Laser power was titrated before signal acquisition and adjusted to the minimum level that induced reliable spiking response. Typical light power at the fiber tip was measured in the range of 15–40 mW/mm2. Optogenetic stimulations consisted of ramp-like stimuli of 3 s duration as previously described. Ramp stimulations were repeated 30–120 times and carried out on the two outmost lateral shanks of the 4-shank electrodes, corresponding to superficial and deep layers of the mPFC. In Figures 3C and 4C, Figure 4—figure supplement 1B and D, these two distinct optogenetic protocols are plotted separately (statistical analysis is however run on the individual mouse level, see ‘Statistical modeling’ section).
Histology
Epifluorescence images of coronal brain sections were acquired postmortem to reconstruct the position of the recording electrode and quantify the amount of eYFP expressing neurons. Only mice in which the electrodes were placed in the correct position were kept for further analysis. eYFP expression was manually quantified on a slide-by-slide basis.
Neural network modeling
The architecture of the network was set similarly to, and is schematically illustrated in Figure 2A. The network was composed of a total of 400 conductance-based LIF units, 80% of which were excitatory (E) (N=320) and 20% were inhibitory (I) (N=80). The units in the network were all connected with each other, with a synaptic weight that was log-normally distributed. Excitatory (E→E, E→I) and inhibitory (I→I and I→E) synapses were mediated by AMPA and GABA conductances, respectively. All baseline parameter values used in the simulations are listed in Table 1. All simulations were performed using Brain2 for Python3.7.
The dynamics of each excitatory and inhibitory cell were governed by the following stochastic differential equation:
with
and
where is the membrane potential, is the leak membrane potential, and and denote the AMPA and GABA current reversal potentials, respectively. The synaptic conductance parameters and the corresponding decay time constants are denoted by, and,, respectively. is a noise term that is generated by an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process with zero mean. Due to the near-instantaneous rise times of AMPA- and GABA-mediated currents (both typically <0.5 ms), we opted to neglect these in the current simulations. Moreover, synaptic transmission was assumed to be instantaneous (i.e. with zero delay). The excitatory units of the network received an additional external input in the form of AMPA-mediated Poisson spike trains from an external pool of 100 units with a constant spike rate of 1.5 spikes/s.
In order to assess the effect of altered E-I ratio, we parametrically modulated all excitatory (through multiplication with 25 linearly spaced values from 0.1 to 0.7) and all inhibitory (26 linearly spaced values from 0.2 to 1.2) synaptic conductances. The network was simulated for a duration of 30 s for each of the 25×26 parameter combinations. For each parameter combination, the LFP of the network was computed by taking the sum of the absolute values of the AMPA and GABA currents on all excitatory cells. Neuronal correlation was estimated by means of the STTC (see below), assessed at a lag of 1 s.
To mimic optogenetic modulation of IN activity, we added an external current to the stochastic differential equation regulating the dynamics of inhibitory neurons:
where Istim is a 3-s-long ramp-like inhibitory or excitatory current, administered in repeated sweeps, with an interval of 6 s.
Electrophysiological analysis
Data were analyzed with custom-written algorithms in the MATLAB and Python environment that are available on the following github repository: https://github.com/mchini/Chini_et_al_EI_decorrelation (copy archived at swh:1:rev:9a07c56f36c80a60a44a6607a5a4061a37d96ae7; ).
Detection of active periods
During early development, brain activity is characterized by an alternation of periods of isoelectric traces (silent periods) and oscillatory bursts (active periods). To detect and quantify the properties of active periods, we developed a novel detection algorithm. For this, the extracellular signal was band-pass filtered (4–20 Hz) and downsampled to 100 Hz, before being averaged across recording electrodes. The average signal (raw and z-scored) was then passed through a boxcar square filter (500 ms) on which a hysteresis threshold was applied. Active periods were firstly detected as oscillatory peaks exceeding an absolute or relative threshold (100 µV or four standard deviations, respectively) and subsequently extended to all neighboring time points that exceed a lower threshold (50 µV or two standard deviations, respectively). The combination of absolute and relative thresholding makes this approach suitable to a wide range of signals, from the highly discontinuous brain activity of P2 mice, to the nearly continuous brain activity of P11-12 mice (Figure 1A–B). Neighboring active periods whose inter-active period interval was shorter than 1 s were merged. Active periods whose duration was smaller than 300 ms were discarded.
Power spectral density
PSDs for mouse and human data (see below for exception) were computed with the mtspecgramc function of the Chronux Toolbox (10-s-long windows, 5 s overlap). Median averaging was the preferred measure of central tendency. To quantify the PSD modulation by IN optogenetic stimulation/inhibition, we computed the MI (see below) of the PSD computed on the last 1.5 s of the optogenetic stimulation with the PSD computed on the 1.5 s preceding stimulus delivery.
EEG preprocessing
EEG signal was extracted only from frontal electrodes (Fp1, F7, F3, Fp2, F8, F4, Fpz, when available) and re-referenced to a common average reference before further analysis. From the EEG dataset of 1100 sleeping babies, epochs whose average envelope amplitude exceeded two standard deviations from the mean were considered as possible artifacts and were removed from further analysis. No preprocessing was applied to the EEG dataset of sleeping babies recorded at 40 and 43 PCW, as PSDs were already included in the freely available data.
1/f exponent
The 1/f exponent was extracted on the 5–20 and 5–45 Hz (human and mouse data, respectively) frequency range of PSDs using the FOOOF package with the ‘fixed’ aperiodic mode. To quantify the 1/f exponent modulation by IN optogenetic stimulation/inhibition, we compared the exponent obtained by PSDs computed on the second half of the optogenetic stimulation with the baseline exponent.
Spike sorting
Spike sorting was performed using Klusta. Automatically obtained clusters were then manually curated using phy (https://github.com/cortex-lab/phy, ).
Spike time tiling coefficient
The STTC, a metric that tracks correlations between spike trains and is robust to changes in firing rate, was calculated as previously described (;; Figure 3A):
where PA is defined as the proportion of spikes in spike train A that falls within ±Δt of a spike from spike train B. TA is defined as the proportion of time that occurs within (is ‘tiled’ by) ±Δt from the spikes of spike train A. The same applies for PB and TB. The ‘lag’ parameter ±Δt controls the ‘timescale’ at which the STTC is computed, a parameter that we systematically varied across more than three orders of magnitude (from 2.5 ms to 10 s). Baseline STTC analysis was limited to spike trains pairs that were recorded for at least an hour and for which both spike trains had at least 50 spikes (40,921 of 56,613 spike train pairs). To quantify the STTC modulation by IN optogenetic stimulation/inhibition, we compared the STTC derived by spike matrices obtained during the 3 s optogenetic stimulation with the STTC derived by spike matrices obtained during the 3 s preceding optogenetic stimulation.
Modulation index
The modulation index (MI) is a normalization strategy that was used to compute optogenetically induced changes in firing rate and LFP power. The MI has the desirable property of bounding the normalized value between –1 and 1. MI was computed as:
Optogenetic modulation of electrophysiological parameters
Modulation of firing rate by optogenetic manipulation was quantified using the MI and signed-rank testing that compared the firing rate during the last 1.5 s of optical stimulation with the firing rate during the 1.5 s preceding stimulus delivery.
PCA of spike matrices during optogenetic stimulations
The first two PCA components of the spike during optogenetic stimulations were computed on trial-averaged spike trains that were convolved with a Gaussian window (500 ms length, 50 ms standard deviation) and z-scored across the time dimension.
Statistical modeling
Statistical modeling was carried out in the R environment. All the scripts and the processed data on which the analysis is based are available from the following github repository: https://github.com/mchini/Chini_et_al_EI_decorrelation.
Nested data were analyzed with (generalized) linear mixed-effects models (lmer and glmer functions of the lme4 R package; ). Depending on the specific experimental design, we used ‘mouse’ or ‘subject’ as random effects. For statistical analysis of STTC, to maximize interpretability of the results (i.e. avoid multiple triple interactions), each STTC lag was investigated as its own independent variable, using identical statistical models. Regression on that data, upon visual inspection seemed to be better fit by an exponential curve, were fitted with generalized linear (mixed-effect) models (family = Gamma, α=1, link = inverse). Proportions (e.g. the proportion of activated/inhibited units) were also fitted with generalized linear (mixed-effect) models (family = Binomial, link = logit). Statistical significance for linear mixed-effects models were computed with the lmerTest R package, using the Satterthwaite’s degrees of freedom method. When possible, model selection was performed according to experimental design. When this was not possible, models were compared using the compare_performance function of the performance R package, and model choice was based on an holistic comparison of AIC, BIC, RMSE, and R2. Model output was plotted with the plot_model (type=‘pred’) function of the sjPlot R package; 95% confidence intervals were computed using the confint R function. Post hoc analysis with Tukey multiple comparison correction was carried out using the emmeans and emtrends functions of the emmeans R package.
References 115
- 1.
Akin O, Bajar BT, Keles MF, Frye MA, Zipursky SL. Cell-type-specific patterned stimulus-independent neuronal activity in the Drosophila visual system during synapse formation. Neuron. 2019;101:894-904.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.008
- 2.
Antoine MW, Langberg T, Schnepel P, Feldman DE. Increased excitation-inhibition ratio stabilizes synapse and circuit excitability in four autism mouse models. Neuron. 2019;101:648-661.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2018.12.026
- 3.
Averbeck BB, Latham PE, Pouget A. Neural correlations, population coding and computation. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. 2006;7:358-366.
Not in our library10.1038/nrn1888
- 4.
Avitan L, Pujic Z, Mölter J, Van De Poll M, Sun B, Teng H, Amor R, Scott EK, Goodhill GJ. Spontaneous activity in the zebrafish tectum reorganizes over development and is influenced by visual experience. Current Biology. 2017;27:2407-2419.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.056
- 5.
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Lme4. arXiv. 2014.
Not in our library10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- 6.
Ben-Ari Y. Excitatory actions of gaba during development: the nature of the nurture. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. 2002;3:728-739.
Not in our library10.1038/nrn920
- 7.
- 8.
Bitzenhofer SH, Ahlbeck J, Wolff A, Wiegert JS, Gee CE, Oertner TG, Hanganu-Opatz IL. Layer-specific optogenetic activation of pyramidal neurons causes beta-gamma entrainment of neonatal networks. Nature Communications. 2017b;8:14563.
Not in our library10.1038/ncomms14563
- 9.
Bitzenhofer SH, Pöpplau JA, Hanganu-Opatz I. Gamma activity accelerates during prefrontal development. eLife. 2020;9:e56795.
Not in our library10.7554/elife.56795
- 10.
Bitzenhofer SH, Pöpplau JA, Chini M, Marquardt A, Hanganu-Opatz IL. A transient developmental increase in prefrontal activity alters network maturation and causes cognitive dysfunction in adult mice. Neuron. 2021;109:1350-1364.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2021.02.011
- 11.
Blankenship AG, Hamby AM, Firl A, Vyas S, Maxeiner S, Willecke K, Feller MB. The role of neuronal connexins 36 and 45 in shaping spontaneous firing patterns in the developing retina. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2011;31:9998-10008.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.5640-10.2011
- 12.
Buzsáki G, Mizuseki K. The log-dynamic brain: how skewed distributions affect network operations. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. 2014;15:264-278.
Not in our library10.1038/nrn3687
- 13.
Che A, Babij R, Iannone AF, Fetcho RN, Ferrer M, Liston C, Fishell G, De Marco García NV. Layer I interneurons sharpen sensory maps during neonatal development. Neuron. 2018;99:98-116.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2018.06.002
- 14.
- 15.
Chini M, Pöpplau JA, Lindemann C, Carol-Perdiguer L, Hnida M, Oberländer V, Xu X, Ahlbeck J, Bitzenhofer SH, Mulert C, Hanganu-Opatz IL. Resolving and rescuing developmental miswiring in a mouse model of cognitive impairment. Neuron. 2020;105:60-74.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2019.09.042
- 16.
Chini M. Software Heritage. 2021.
Not in our library
- 17.
Chini M., Hanganu-Opatz IL. Prefrontal cortex development in health and disease: lessons from rodents and humans. Trends in Neurosciences. 2021;44:227-240.
Not in our library10.1016/j.tins.2020.10.017
- 18.
Cirelli C, Tononi G. Cortical development, electroencephalogram rhythms, and the sleep/wake cycle. Biological Psychiatry. 2015;77:1071-1078.
Not in our library10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.12.017
- 19.
- 20.
Cogswell M, Ahmed F, Girshick R, Zitnick L, Batra D. Reducing Overfitting in Deep Networks by Decorrelating Representations. arXiv. 2016.
Not in our library
- 21.
Colombo MA, Napolitani M, Boly M, Gosseries O, Casarotto S, Rosanova M, Brichant JF, Boveroux P, Rex S, Laureys S, Massimini M, Chieregato A, Sarasso S. The spectral exponent of the resting EEG indexes the presence of consciousness during unresponsiveness induced by propofol, xenon, and ketamine. NeuroImage. 2019;189:631-644.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.024
- 22.
Cossart R. Operational hub cells: a morpho-physiologically diverse class of gabaergic neurons united by a common function. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2014;26:51-56.
Not in our library10.1016/j.conb.2013.12.002
- 23.
Cun YL, Denker JS, Solla SA. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 1990;598-605.
Not in our library
- 24.
Cutts CS, Eglen SJ. Detecting pairwise correlations in spike trains: an objective comparison of methods and application to the study of retinal waves. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2014;34:14288-14303.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.2767-14.2014
- 25.
Donoghue T, Haller M, Peterson EJ, Varma P, Sebastian P, Gao R, Noto T, Lara AH, Wallis JD, Knight RT, Shestyuk A, Voytek B. Parameterizing neural power spectra into periodic and aperiodic components. Nature Neuroscience. 2020;23:1655-1665.
Not in our library10.1038/s41593-020-00744-x
- 26.
Dorrn AL, Yuan K, Barker AJ, Schreiner CE, Froemke RC. Developmental sensory experience balances cortical excitation and inhibition. Nature. 2010;465:932-936.
Not in our library10.1038/nature09119
- 27.
Duan ZRS, Che A, Chu P, Modol L, Bollmann Y, Babij R, Fetcho RN, Otsuka T, Fuccillo MV, Liston C, Pisapia DJ, Cossart R, De Marco García NV. GABAergic restriction of network dynamics regulates interneuron survival in the developing cortex. Neuron. 2018;105:75-92.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2019.10.008
- 28.
Favuzzi E, Deogracias R, Marques-Smith A, Maeso P, Jezequel J, Exposito-Alonso D, Balia M, Kroon T, Hinojosa AJ, F Maraver E, Rico B. Distinct molecular programs regulate synapse specificity in cortical inhibitory circuits. Science. 2019;363:413-417.
Not in our library10.1126/science.aau8977
- 29.
- 30.
Frankle J, Carbin M. The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networks. arXiv. 2019.
Not in our library
- 31.
Gao R, Penzes P. Common mechanisms of excitatory and inhibitory imbalance in schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders. Current Molecular Medicine. 2015;15:146-167.
Not in our library10.2174/1566524015666150303003028
- 32.
Gao R, Peterson EJ, Voytek B. Inferring synaptic excitation/inhibition balance from field potentials. NeuroImage. 2017;158:70-78.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.078
- 33.
Garaschuk O, Linn J, Eilers J, Konnerth A. Large-scale oscillatory calcium waves in the immature cortex. Nature Neuroscience. 2000;3:452-459.
Not in our library10.1038/74823
- 34.
Golshani P, Gonçalves JT, Khoshkhoo S, Mostany R, Smirnakis S, Portera-Cailliau C. Internally mediated developmental desynchronization of neocortical network activity. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2009;29:10890-10899.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.2012-09.2009
- 35.
Goltstein PM, Montijn JS, Pennartz CMA. Effects of isoflurane anesthesia on ensemble patterns of ca2+ activity in mouse v1: reduced direction selectivity independent of increased correlations in cellular activity. PLOS ONE. 2015;10:e0118277.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0118277
- 36.
Gour A, Boergens KM, Heike N, Hua Y, Laserstein P, Song K, Helmstaedter M. Postnatal connectomic development of inhibition in mouse barrel cortex. Science. 2021;371:eabb4534.
Not in our library10.1126/science.abb4534
- 37.
Greenberg DS, Houweling AR, Kerr JND. Population imaging of ongoing neuronal activity in the visual cortex of awake rats. Nature Neuroscience. 2008;11:749-751.
Not in our library10.1038/nn.2140
- 38.
- 39.
Hamm JP, Peterka DS, Gogos JA, Yuste R. Altered cortical ensembles in mouse models of schizophrenia. Neuron. 2017;94:153-167.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.019
- 40.
Hazan L, Ziv NE. Activity dependent and independent determinants of synaptic size diversity. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2020;40:2828-2848.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.2181-19.2020
- 41.
He W, Donoghue T, Sowman PF, Seymour RA, Brock J, Crain S, Voytek B, Hillebrand A. Co-Increasing Neuronal Noise and Beta Power in the Developing Brain. bioRxiv. 2019.
Not in our library10.1101/839258
- 42.
Hendry SH, Schwark HD, Jones EG, Yan J. Numbers and proportions of GABA-immunoreactive neurons in different areas of monkey cerebral cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1987;7:1503-1519.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.07-05-01503.1987
- 43.
Hermans L, Leunissen I, Pauwels L, Cuypers K, Peeters R, Puts NAJ, Edden RAE, Swinnen SP. Brain GABA levels are associated with inhibitory control deficits in older adults. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2018;38:7844-7851.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.0760-18.2018
- 44.
Izhikevich L, Gao R, Peterson E, Voytek B. Measuring the Average Power of Neural Oscillations. bioRxiv. 2018.
Not in our library10.1101/441626
- 45.
Jukic AM, Baird DD, Weinberg CR, McConnaughey DR, Wilcox AJ. Length of human pregnancy and contributors to its natural variation. Human Reproduction. 2013;28:2848-2855.
Not in our library10.1093/humrep/det297
- 46.
Kalemaki K, Velli A, Christodoulou O, Denaxa M, Karagogeos D, Sidiropoulou K. The developmental changes in intrinsic and synaptic properties of prefrontal neurons enhance local network activity from the second to the third postnatal weeks in mice. Cerebral Cortex. 2021;bhab438:bhab438.
Not in our library10.1093/cercor/bhab438
- 47.
Kato HK, Asinof SK, Isaacson JS. Network-level control of frequency tuning in auditory cortex. Neuron. 2017;95:412-423.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.019
- 48.
Kepecs A, Fishell G. Interneuron cell types are fit to function. Nature. 2014;505:318-326.
Not in our library10.1038/nature12983
- 49.
Khazipov R, Sirota A, Leinekugel X, Holmes GL, Ben-Ari Y, Buzsáki G. Early motor activity drives spindle bursts in the developing somatosensory cortex. Nature. 2004;432:758-761.
Not in our library10.1038/nature03132
- 50.
Kirmse K, Kummer M, Kovalchuk Y, Witte OW, Garaschuk O, Holthoff K. GABA depolarizes immature neurons and inhibits network activity in the neonatal neocortex in vivo. Nature Communications. 2015;6:7750.
Not in our library10.1038/ncomms8750
- 51.
Kohn A, Coen-Cagli R, Kanitscheider I, Pouget A. Correlations and neuronal population information. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2016;39:237-256.
Not in our library10.1146/annurev-neuro-070815-013851
- 52.
Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. Christensen, lmertest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software. 2017;82:1-26.
Not in our library10.18637/jss.v082.i13
- 53.
- 54.
Lennie P. The cost of cortical computation. Current Biology. 2003;13:493-497.
Not in our library10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00135-0
- 55.
Lenth RV, Buerkner P, Herve M, Love J, Riebl H, Singmann H. Emmeans. 2020.
Not in our library
- 56.
Lim L, Mi D, Llorca A, Marín O. Development and functional diversification of cortical interneurons. Neuron. 2018;100:294-313.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.009
- 57.
Lissemore JI, Bhandari A, Mulsant BH, Lenze EJ, Reynolds CF, Karp JF, Rajji TK, Noda Y, Zomorrodi R, Sibille E, Daskalakis ZJ, Blumberger DM. Reduced gabaergic cortical inhibition in aging and depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018;43:2277-2284.
Not in our library10.1038/s41386-018-0093-x
- 58.
Lombardi F, Herrmann HJ, de Arcangelis L. Balance of excitation and inhibition determines 1/f power spectrum in neuronal networks. Chaos. 2017;27:047402.
Not in our library10.1063/1.4979043
- 59.
Lüdecke D, Bartel A, Schwemmer C. Zenoda. 2021a.
Not in our library
- 60.
Lüdecke D, Ben-Shachar M, Patil I, Waggoner P, Makowski D. Performance: an R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. Journal of Open Source Software. 2021b;6:3139.
Not in our library10.21105/joss.03139
- 61.
Luongo FJ, Horn ME, Sohal VS. Putative microcircuit-level substrates for attention are disrupted in mouse models of autism. Biological Psychiatry. 2016;79:667-675.
Not in our library10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.04.014
- 62.
Markram H, Toledo-Rodriguez M, Wang Y, Gupta A, Silberberg G, Wu C. Interneurons of the neocortical inhibitory system. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. 2004;5:793-807.
Not in our library10.1038/nrn1519
- 63.
- 64.
- 65.
Medendorp WE, Bjorefeldt A, Crespo EL, Prakash M, Pal A, Waddell ML, Moore CI, Hochgeschwender U. Selective postnatal excitation of neocortical pyramidal neurons results in distinctive behavioral and circuit deficits in adulthood. IScience. 2021;24:102157.
Not in our library10.1016/j.isci.2021.102157
- 66.
Mizuno H, Rao MS, Mizuno H, Sato T, Nakazawa S, Iwasato T. NMDA receptor enhances correlation of spontaneous activity in neonatal barrel cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2021;41:1207-1217.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.0527-20.2020
- 67.
Modol L, Bollmann Y, Tressard T, Baude A, Che A, Duan ZRS, Babij R, De Marco García NV, Cossart R. Assemblies of perisomatic gabaergic neurons in the developing barrel cortex. Neuron. 2020;105:93-105.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2019.10.007
- 68.
Moore AK, Weible AP, Balmer TS, Trussell LO, Wehr M. Rapid rebalancing of excitation and inhibition by cortical circuitry. Neuron. 2018;97:1341-1355.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.045
- 69.
Moreno-Bote R, Beck J, Kanitscheider I, Pitkow X, Latham P, Pouget A. Information-limiting correlations. Nature Neuroscience. 2014;17:1410-1417.
Not in our library10.1038/nn.3807
- 70.
Murata Y, Colonnese MT. GABAergic interneurons excite neonatal hippocampus in vivo. Science Advances. 2020;6:eaba1430.
Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.aba1430
- 71.
Nelson SB, Valakh V. Excitatory/inhibitory balance and circuit homeostasis in autism spectrum disorders. Neuron. 2015;87:684-698.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2015.07.033
- 72.
Olshausen BA, Field DJ. Sparse coding of sensory inputs. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2004;14:481-487.
Not in our library10.1016/j.conb.2004.07.007
- 73.
Omidvarnia A, Fransson P, Metsäranta M, Vanhatalo S. Functional bimodality in the brain networks of preterm and term human newborns. Cerebral Cortex. 2014;24:2657-2668.
Not in our library10.1093/cercor/bht120
- 74.
Picardo MA, Guigue P, Bonifazi P, Batista-Brito R, Allene C, Ribas A, Fishell G, Baude A, Cossart R. Pioneer GABA cells comprise a subpopulation of hub neurons in the developing hippocampus. Neuron. 2011;71:695-709.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.018
- 75.
Rahmati V, Kirmse K, Holthoff K, Schwabe L, Kiebel SJ. Developmental emergence of sparse coding: A dynamic systems approach. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:13015.
Not in our library10.1038/s41598-017-13468-z
- 76.
Rochefort NL, Garaschuk O, Milos RI, Narushima M, Marandi N, Pichler B, Kovalchuk Y, Konnerth A. Sparsification of neuronal activity in the visual cortex at eye-opening. PNAS. 2009;106:15049-15054.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0907660106
- 77.
Rossant C, Kadir SN, Goodman DFM, Schulman J, Hunter MLD, Saleem AB, Grosmark A, Belluscio M, Denfield GH, Ecker AS, Tolias AS, Solomon S, Buzsaki G, Carandini M, Harris KD. Spike sorting for large, dense electrode arrays. Nature Neuroscience. 2016;19:634-641.
Not in our library10.1038/nn.4268
- 78.
Rossant C. GitHub. 2022.
Not in our library
- 79.
Roux L, Stark E, Sjulson L, Buzsáki G. In vivo optogenetic identification and manipulation of gabaergic interneuron subtypes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2014;26:88-95.
Not in our library10.1016/j.conb.2013.12.013
- 80.
Sadeh S, Silver RA, Mrsic-Flogel TD, Muir DR. Assessing the role of inhibition in stabilizing neocortical networks requires large-scale perturbation of the inhibitory population. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2017;37:12050-12067.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.0963-17.2017
- 81.
Sadeh S, Clopath C. Patterned perturbation of inhibition can reveal the dynamical structure of neural processing. eLife. 2020;9:e52757.
Not in our library10.7554/elife.52757
- 82.
- 83.
Schaworonkow N, Voytek B. Longitudinal changes in aperiodic and periodic activity in electrophysiological recordings in the first seven months of life. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 2021;47:100895.
Not in our library10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100895
- 84.
Schetinin V, Jakaite L. Extraction of features from sleep EEG for bayesian assessment of brain development. PLOS ONE. 2017;12:e0174027.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0174027
- 85.
Sessolo M, Marcon I, Bovetti S, Losi G, Cammarota M, Ratto GM, Fellin T, Carmignoto G. Parvalbumin-positive inhibitory interneurons oppose propagation but favor generation of focal epileptiform activity. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2015;35:9544-9557.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.5117-14.2015
- 86.
Shen J, Colonnese MT. Development of activity in the mouse visual cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2016;36:12259-12275.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.1903-16.2016
- 87.
Shew WL, Yang H, Yu S, Roy R, Plenz D. Information capacity and transmission are maximized in balanced cortical networks with neuronal avalanches. Journal of Neuroscience. 2014;31:55-63.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.4637-10.2011
- 88.
Sidman RL, Rakic P. Neuronal migration, with special reference to developing human brain: a review. Brain Research. 1973;62:1-35.
Not in our library10.1016/0006-8993(73)90617-3
- 89.
Siegel F, Heimel JA, Peters J, Lohmann C. Peripheral and central inputs shape network dynamics in the developing visual cortex in vivo. Current Biology. 2012;22:253-258.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2011.12.026
- 90.
Smith MA, Kohn A. Spatial and temporal scales of neuronal correlation in primary visual cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2008;28:12591-12603.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.2929-08.2008
- 91.
Sohal VS, Rubenstein JLR. Excitation-inhibition balance as a framework for investigating mechanisms in neuropsychiatric disorders. Molecular Psychiatry. 2019;24:1248-1257.
Not in our library10.1038/s41380-019-0426-0
- 92.
- 93.
Tokariev A, Videman M, Palva JM, Vanhatalo S. Functional brain connectivity develops rapidly around term age and changes between vigilance states in the human newborn. Cerebral Cortex. 2016;26:4540-4550.
Not in our library10.1093/cercor/bhv219
- 94.
Tokariev A, Stjerna S, Lano A, Metsäranta M, Palva JM, Vanhatalo S. Preterm birth changes networks of newborn cortical activity. Cerebral Cortex. 2019;29:814-826.
Not in our library10.1093/cercor/bhy012
- 95.
- 96.
Tremblay R, Lee S, Rudy B. GABAergic interneurons in the neocortex: from cellular properties to circuits. Neuron. 2016;91:260-292.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.033
- 97.
Trujillo CA, Gao R, Negraes PD, Gu J, Buchanan J, Preissl S, Wang A, Wu W, Haddad GG, Chaim IA, Domissy A, Vandenberghe M, Devor A, Yeo GW, Voytek B, Muotri AR. Complex oscillatory waves emerging from cortical organoids model early human brain network development. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;25:558-569.
Not in our library10.1016/j.stem.2019.08.002
- 98.
Tsodyks MV, Skaggs WE, Sejnowski TJ, McNaughton BL. Paradoxical effects of external modulation of inhibitory interneurons. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1997;17:4382-4388.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.17-11-04382.1997
- 99.
Tuncdemir SN, Wamsley B, Stam FJ, Osakada F, Goulding M, Callaway EM, Rudy B, Fishell G. Early somatostatin interneuron connectivity mediates the maturation of deep layer cortical circuits. Neuron. 2016;89:521-535.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.020
- 100.
Valente M, Pica G, Bondanelli G, Moroni M, Runyan CA, Morcos AS, Harvey CD, Panzeri S. Correlations enhance the behavioral readout of neural population activity in association cortex. Nature Neuroscience. 2021;24:975-986.
Not in our library10.1038/s41593-021-00845-1
- 101.
Vanhatalo S, Kaila K. Development of neonatal EEG activity: from phenomenology to physiology. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2006;11:471-478.
Not in our library10.1016/j.siny.2006.07.008
- 102.
Vinje WE, Gallant JL. Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. Science. 2000;287:1273-1276.
Not in our library10.1126/science.287.5456.1273
- 103.
Voytek B, Kramer MA, Case J, Lepage KQ, Tempesta ZR, Knight RT, Gazzaley A. Age-related changes in 1/f neural electrophysiological noise. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2015;35:13257-13265.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.2332-14.2015
- 104.
- 105.
- 106.
Wong FK, Bercsenyi K, Sreenivasan V, Portalés A, Fernández-Otero M, Marín O. Pyramidal cell regulation of interneuron survival sculpts cortical networks. Nature. 2018;557:668-673.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-018-0139-6
- 107.
- 108.
Xu XX, Chini M, Bitzenhofer SH, Hanganu-Opatz IL. Transient knock-down of prefrontal DISC1 in immune-challenged mice causes abnormal long-range coupling and cognitive dysfunction throughout development. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2019;39:1222-1235.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.2170-18.2018
- 109.
Xu X, Song L, Kringel R, Hanganu-Opatz IL. Developmental Decrease of Entorhinal Gate Disrupts Prefrontal-Hippocampal Communication in Immune-Challenged DISC1 Knockdown Mice. Research Square. 2021.
Not in our library10.21203/rs.3.rs-290304/v1
- 110.
- 111.
Yizhar O, Fenno LE, Prigge M, Schneider F, Davidson TJ, O’Shea DJ, Sohal VS, Goshen I, Finkelstein J, Paz JT, Stehfest K, Fudim R, Ramakrishnan C, Huguenard JR, Hegemann P, Deisseroth K. Neocortical excitation/inhibition balance in information processing and social dysfunction. Nature. 2011;477:171-178.
Not in our library10.1038/nature10360
- 112.
Yu Y, Migliore M, Hines ML, Shepherd GM. Sparse coding and lateral inhibition arising from balanced and unbalanced dendrodendritic excitation and inhibition. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2014;34:13701-13713.
Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.1834-14.2014
- 113.
Zhang Z, Jiao YY, Sun QQ. Developmental maturation of excitation and inhibition balance in principal neurons across four layers of somatosensory cortex. Neuroscience. 2011;174:10-25.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.11.045
- 114.
- 115.
Zick JL, Blackman RK, Crowe DA, Amirikian B, DeNicola AL, Netoff TI, Chafee MV. Blocking NMDAR disrupts spike timing and decouples monkey prefrontal circuits: implications for activity-dependent disconnection in schizophrenia. Neuron. 2018;98:1243-1255.
Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2018.05.010
Cited by papers we hold 2
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.