No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Nov 4, 2026.

Exploring functional protein covariation across single cells using nPOP

Andrew Leduc, R. Gray Huffman, Joshua Cantlon and 2 more

Genome Biology · 2022 · CC BY

doi:10.1101/2021.04.24.441211

Abstract

Background. Many biological processes, such as cell division cycle and drug resistance, are reflected in protein covariation across single cells. This covariation can be quantified and interpreted by single-cell mass spectrometry with sufficiently high throughput and accuracy.

Results. Here, we describe nPOP, a method that enables simultaneous sample preparation of thousands of single cells, including lysing, digesting, and labeling individual cells in volumes of 8–20 nl. nPOP uses piezo acoustic dispensing to isolate individual cells in 300 pl volumes and performs all subsequent sample preparation steps in small droplets on a fluorocarbon-coated glass slide. Protein covariation analysis identifies cell cycle dynamics that are similar and dynamics that differ between cell types, even within subpopulations of melanoma cells delineated by markers for drug resistance priming. Melanoma cells expressing these markers accumulate in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, display distinct protein covariation across the cell cycle, accumulate glycogen, and have lower abundance of glycolytic enzymes. The non-primed melanoma cells exhibit gradients of protein abundance, suggesting transition states. Within this subpopulation, proteins functioning in oxidative phosphorylation covary with each other and inversely with proteins functioning in glycolysis. This protein covariation suggests divergent reliance on energy sources and its association with other biological functions. These results are validated by different mass spectrometry methods.

Conclusions. nPOP enables flexible, automated, and highly parallelized sample preparation for single-cell proteomics. This allows for quantifying protein covariation across thousands of single cells and revealing functionally concerted biological differences between closely related cell states. Support for nPOP is available at https://scp.slavovlab.net/nPOP.

Supplementary Information. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13059-022-02817-5.

References 53

1.
The Human Cell Atlas · 2017
No notice
2.
Specht H, Slavov N. Transformative opportunities for single-cell proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2018;17:2563-2916.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00257
3.
Ziegenhain C, et al. Comparative analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing methods. Mol Cell. 2017;65:631-643.
Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2017.01.023
4.
Slavov N. Unpicking the proteome in single cells. Science. 2020;367:512-513.
Not in our library10.1126/science.aaz6695
5.
Slavov N. Learning from natural variation across the proteomes of single cells. PLoS Biol. 2022;20:1-4.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pbio.3001512
6.
Shaffer SM, et al. Rare cell variability and drug-induced reprogramming as a mode of cancer drug resistance. Nature. 2017;546:431-435.
Not in our library10.1038/nature22794
7.
Emert BL, et al. Variability within rare cell states enables multiple paths toward drug resistance. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:865-876.
Not in our library10.1038/s41587-021-00837-3
8.
Stallaert W, et al. The structure of the human cell cycle. Cell Syst. 2022;13(3):230-240.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cels.2021.10.007
9.
Mahdessian D, et al. Spatiotemporal dissection of the cell cycle with single-cell proteogenomics. Nature. 2021;590:649-654.
Not in our library10.1038/s41586-021-03232-9
10.
Slavov N. Scaling up single-cell proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2022;21:100179.
Not in our library10.1016/j.mcpro.2021.100179
11.
Slavov N. Single-cell protein analysis by mass spectrometry. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2020;60:1-9.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.04.018
12.
Vanderaa C, Gatto L. Replication of single-cell proteomics data reveals important computational challenges. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2021;18:835-843.
Not in our library10.1080/14789450.2021.1988571
13.
Kelly RT. Single-cell proteomics: progress and prospects. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2020;19:1739-1748.
Not in our library10.1074/mcp.r120.002234
14.
Single-cell proteomic and transcriptomic analysis of macrophage heterogeneity using SCoPE2 · 2021
No notice
15.
Singh A. Towards resolving proteomes in single cells. en. Nat Methods. 2021;18:856.
Not in our library10.1038/s41592-021-01243-y
16.
Li Z-Y, et al. Nanoliter-scale oil-air-droplet chip-based single cell proteomic analysis. Anal Chem. 2018;90:5430-5438.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00661
17.
Nanodroplet processing platform for deep and quantitative proteome profiling of 10–100 mammalian cells · 2018
No notice
18.
Specht H, et al. Automated sample preparation for high-throughput single-cell proteomics. bioRxiv. 2018. 10.1101/399774.
Not in our library
19.
Ctortecka C. et al. An automated workflow for multiplexed single-cell proteomics sample preparation at unprecedented sensitivity. bioRxiv. 2021. 10.1101/2021.04.14.439828.
Not in our library
20.
Marx V. A dream of single-cell proteomics. Nat Methods. 2019;16:809-812.
Not in our library10.1038/s41592-019-0540-6
21.
Klein AM, et al. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell. 2015;161:1187-1201.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.044
22.
Macosko EZ, et al. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell. 2015;161:1202-1214.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.002
23.
Cong Y, et al. Ultrasensitive single-cell proteomics workflow identifies > 1000 protein groups per mammalian cell. Chem Sci. 2021;12:1001-1006.
Not in our library10.1039/d0sc03636f
24.
Derks J, et al. Increasing the throughput of sensitive proteomics by plexDIA. Nat Biotechnol. 2022. 10.1038/s41587-022-01389-w.
Not in our library10.1038/s41587-022-01389-w
25.
Petelski AA, et al. Multiplexed single-cell proteomics using SCoPE2. Nat Protoc. 2021;16:5398-5425.
Not in our library10.1038/s41596-021-00616-z
26.
Framework for multiplicative scaling of single-cell proteomics. en. Nat Biotechnol. 2022:1–2. 10.1038/s41587-022-01411-1.
Not in our library10.1038/s41587-022-01411-1
27.
Huffman RG, et al. Prioritized single-cell proteomics reveals molecular and functional polarization across primary macrophages. Nature Methods In press. bioRxiv 2022.03.16.484655. 2022. 10.1101/2022.03.16.484655.
Not in our library
28.
Glotzer M, Murray AW, Kirschner MW. Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway. Nature. 1991;349:132-138.
Not in our library10.1038/349132a0
29.
Adaptive resistance of melanoma cells to RAF inhibition via reversible induction of a slowly dividing de‐differentiated state · 2017
No notice
30.
Harmange G, et al. Disrupting cellular memory to overcome drug resistance. bioRxiv. 2022. 10.1101/2022.06.16.496161.
Not in our library
31.
Rousset M, Chevalier G, Rousset J-P, Dussaulx E, Zweibaum A. Presence and cell growth-related variations of glycogen in human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell lines in culture. Cancer Res. 1979;39:531-534.
Not in our library
32.
Slavov, N. Universality, specificity and regulation of S. cerevisiae growth rate response in different carbon sources and nutrient limitations PhD thesis (Princeton University, 2010).
Not in our library
33.
Slavov N, Botstein D, Caudy A. Extensive regulation of metabolism and growth during the cell division cycle. bioRxiv. 2014. 10.1101/005629.
Not in our library
34.
Slavov N. Increasing proteomics throughput. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:809-810.
Not in our library10.1038/s41587-021-00881-z
35.
SCoPE-MS: mass spectrometry of single mammalian cells quantifies proteome heterogeneity during cell differentiation · 2018
No notice
36.
Leduc A, Huffman RG, Cantlon J, Khan S, Slavov N. Highly parallel droplet sample preparation for Single Cell Proteomics V.2. protocols.io. 2022.
Not in our library
37.
Cooper S. The synchronization manifesto: a critique of whole-culture synchronization. FEBS J. 2019;286:4650-4656.
Not in our library10.1111/febs.15050
38.
Cox J, Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized ppb range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:1367-1372.
Not in our library10.1038/nbt.1511
39.
Cox J, et al. Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. J Proteome Res. 2011;10:1794-1805.
Not in our library10.1021/pr101065j
40.
Tyanova S, Temu T, Cox J. The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. Nat Protoc. 2016;11:2301.
Not in our library10.1038/nprot.2016.136
41.
Chen AT, Franks A, Slavov N. DART-ID increases single-cell proteome coverage. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019;15:1-30.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007082
42.
Demichev V, Messner CB, Vernardis SI, Lilley KS, Ralser M. DIA-NN: neural networks and interference correction enable deep proteome coverage in high throughput. Nat Methods. 2020;17:41-44.
Not in our library10.1038/s41592-019-0638-x
43.
Vanderaa C, Gatto L. Utilizing Scp for the analysis and replication of single-cell proteomics data. bioRxiv. 2021. 10.1101/2021.04.12.439408.
Not in our library
44.
Vanderaa C, Gatto L. Mass spectrometry-based single-cell proteomics data analysis. Bioconductor. 2020. 10.18129/B9.bioc.scp.
Not in our library
45.
Single-cell proteomic and transcriptomic analysis of macrophage heterogeneity using SCoPE2 · 2021
No notice
46.
Johnson WE, Li C, Rabinovic A. Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. Biostatistics. 2007;8:118-127.
Not in our library10.1093/biostatistics/kxj037
47.
Post-transcriptional regulation across human tissues · 2017
No notice
48.
Exploring functional protein covariation across single cells using nPOP · 2022
No notice
49.
Exploring functional protein covariation across single cells using nPOP · 2022
No notice
50.
Gatto L, et al. Initial recommendations for performing, benchmarking, and reporting single-cell proteomics experiments. Nature Methods In press. Preprint: 2022. arXiv:2207.10815, 10.48550/arXiv.2207.10815.
Not in our library10.1038/s41592-023-01785-3
51.
Exploring functional protein covariation across single cells using nPOP · 2022
No notice
52.
Exploring functional protein covariation across single cells using nPOP · 2022
No notice
53.
Huffman G, Chen AT, Specht H, Slavov N. DO-MS: data-driven optimization of mass spectrometry methods. J Proteome Res. 2019;18:2493-2500.
Not in our library10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00039

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.