Skip to content
naulon
Get started

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 29, 2026.

Gender-related variables for health research

Mathias W. Nielsen, Marcia L. Stefanick, Diana Peragine and 10 more

Biology of Sex Differences · 2021 · CC BY

doi:10.1186/s13293-021-00366-3

Abstract

Background. In this paper, we argue for Gender as a Sociocultural Variable (GASV) as a complement to Sex as a Biological Variable (SABV). Sex (biology) and gender (sociocultural behaviors and attitudes) interact to influence health and disease processes across the lifespan—which is currently playing out in the COVID-19 pandemic. This study develops a gender assessment tool—the Stanford Gender-Related Variables for Health Research—for use in clinical and population research, including large-scale health surveys involving diverse Western populations. While analyzing sex as a biological variable is widely mandated, gender as a sociocultural variable is not, largely because the field lacks quantitative tools for analyzing the influence of gender on health outcomes.

Methods. We conducted a comprehensive review of English-language measures of gender from 1975 to 2015 to identify variables across three domains: gender norms, gender-related traits, and gender relations. This yielded 11 variables tested with 44 items in three US cross-sectional survey populations: two internet-based (N = 2051; N = 2135) and a patient-research registry (N = 489), conducted between May 2017 and January 2018.

Results. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses reduced 11 constructs to 7 gender-related variables: caregiver strain, work strain, independence, risk-taking, emotional intelligence, social support, and discrimination. Regression analyses, adjusted for age, ethnicity, income, education, sex assigned at birth, and self-reported gender identity, identified associations between these gender-related variables and self-rated general health, physical and mental health, and health-risk behaviors.

Conclusion. Our new instrument represents an important step toward developing more comprehensive and precise survey-based measures of gender in relation to health. Our questionnaire is designed to shed light on how specific gender-related behaviors and attitudes contribute to health and disease processes, irrespective of—or in addition to—biological sex and self-reported gender identity. Use of these gender-related variables in experimental studies, such as clinical trials, may also help us understand if gender factors play an important role as treatment-effect modifiers and would thus need to be further considered in treatment decision-making.

Supplementary Information. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13293-021-00366-3.

References 85

  1. 1.

    Wizemann TM, Pardue M-L. Exploring the biological contributions to human health: does sex matter? 2001.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    Klein SL, Schiebinger L, Stefanick ML, Cahill L, Danska J, de Vries GJ, Kibbe MR, McCarthy MM, Mogil JS, Woodruff TK, Zucker I. Opinion: sex inclusion in basic research drives discovery. PNAS. 2015;112(17):5257-5258.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1502843112

  3. 3.

    Gender, Sex and Health Research Guide: A tool for CIHR applicants. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. 2010. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/50836.html. Accessed 19 Jan 2021.

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    Fact sheet: Gender Equality in Horizon 2020. European Commission. 2013. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/sites/horizon2020/files/FactSheet_Gender_2.pdf. Accessed 19 Jan 2021.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    NOT-OD-15-102: Consideration of sex as a biological variable in NIH-funded research 2015. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-15-102.html. Accessed 28 Aug 2020.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    Madsen TE, Bourjeily G, Hasnain M, Jenkins M, Morrison MF, Sandberg K, Tong IL, Trott J, Werbinksi J, McGregor A. Sex-and gender-based medicine: the need for precise terminology. Gend Genome. 2017;1:122-128.

    Not in our library10.1089/gg.2017.0005

  7. 7.

    Kuhlmann E, Annadale E. Gender and healthcare. 2010.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    Hunt K, Annadale E. Gender and health: major themes in health and social welfare. 2012.

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    Hunt K, Lewars H, Emslie C, Batty GD. Decreased risk of death from coronary heart disease amongst men with higher ‘femininity’ scores: a general population cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:612-620.

    Not in our library10.1093/ije/dym022

  10. 10.

    Pelletier R, Khan NA. Sex versus gender-related characteristics: which predicts outcome after acute coronary syndrome in the young? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:127-135.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.067

  11. 11.

    Pelletier R, Ditto B, Pilote L. A composite measure of gender and its association with risk factors in patients with premature acute coronary syndrome. Psychosom Med. 2015;77(5):517-526.

    Not in our library10.1097/psy.0000000000000186

  12. 12.

    Bem SL. The measurement of psychological androgyny. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974;42(2):155.

    Not in our library10.1037/h0036215

  13. 13.

    Schiebinger L. The mind has no sex? Women in the origins of modern science. 1989.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.246.4936.1502

  14. 14.
    Gender norms and social norms: differences, similarities and why they matter in prevention science · 2019
    No notice
  15. 15.

    Wood W, Eagly AH. Two traditions of research on gender identity. Sex Roles. 2015;73(11):461-473.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11199-015-0480-2

  16. 16.

    Wood W, Eagly AH, Leary MR, Hoyle RH. Gender identity. Handbook of individual differences in social behavior. 2009;109-125.

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    Connell R. Gender, health and theory: conceptualizing the issue, in local and world perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(11):1675-1683.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.006

  18. 18.

    Schiebinger L, Klinge I, Sánchez de Madariaga I, Paik HY, Schraudner M, Stefanick M. Term: Gender. Gendered Innovations in Science, Health & Medicine, Engineering, and Environment. 2021.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    Tannenbaum C, Ellis RP, Eyssel F, Zou J, Schiebinger L. Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering. Nature. 2019;575:137-146.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41586-019-1657-6

  20. 20.

    Heise L, Greene ME, Opper N, Stavropoulou M, Harper C, Nascimento M, Zewdie D, Darmstadt GL, Greene ME, Hawkes S, Heise L, Henry S, Heymann J, Klugman J, Levine R, Raj A, Gupta GR. Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health. Lancet. 2019;393(10189):2440-2454.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30652-x

  21. 21.

    Connell RW, Pearse R. Gender: in world perspective. 2014.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    Cook N. Gender relations in global perspective: essential readings. 2007.

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    Hyde JS, Bigler RS, Joel D, Tate CC, van Anders SM. The future of sex and gender in psychology: five challenges to the gender binary. Am Psychol. 2019;74(2):171-193.

    Not in our library10.1037/amp0000307

  24. 24.

    Lee PH, Stewart SM, Lun VMC, Bond MH, Yu X, Lam TH. Validating the Concord Index as a measure of family relationships in China. J Fam Psychol. 2012;26(6):906-915.

    Not in our library10.1037/a0029994

  25. 25.

    Jackson FM. The development of a race and gender-specific stress measure for African-American women: Jackson, Hogue, Phillips contextualized stress measure. Ethn Dis. 2005;15(4):594-600.

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    Wong YJ, Shea M, LaFollette JR, Hickman SJ, Cruz N, Boghokian T. The inventory of subjective masculinity experiences: development and psychometric properties. J Mens Stud. 2011;19(3):236-255.

    Not in our library10.3149/jms.1903.236

  27. 27.

    Zuckerman M. The development of an affect adjective check list for the measurement of anxiety. J Consult Psychol. 1960;24(5):457-462.

    Not in our library10.1037/h0042713

  28. 28.

    Gillespie BL, Eisler RM. Development of the feminine gender role stress scale: a cognitive-behavioral measure of stress, appraisal, and coping for women. Behav Modif. 1992;16(3):426-438.

    Not in our library10.1177/01454455920163008

  29. 29.

    Mahalik JR, Locke BD, Ludlow LH, Diemer MA, Scott RP, Gottfried M, Freitas G. Development of the conformity to masculine norms inventory. Psychol Men Masculinity. 2003;4(1):3.

    Not in our library10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.3

  30. 30.

    Mahalik JR, Morray EB, Coonerty-Femiano A, Ludlow LH, Slattery SM, Smiler A. Development of the conformity to feminine norms inventory. Sex Roles. 2005;52(7–8):417-435.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11199-005-3709-7

  31. 31.

    Levant R, Richmond K, Cook S, House AT, Aupont M. The femininity ideology scale: factor structure, reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and social contextual variation. Sex Roles. 2007;57(5–6):373-383.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11199-007-9258-5

  32. 32.

    Spence JT, Helmreich RL, Stapp J. The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: a measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. 1978.

    Not in our library

  33. 33.

    Hathaway SR, McKinley JC. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory; manual (revised). 1951.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    Storms MD. Sex role identity and its relationships to sex role attributes and sex role stereotypes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1979;37(10):1779-1789.

    Not in our library10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1779

  35. 35.

    Sugihara Y, Katsurada E. Gender role development in Japanese culture: diminishing gender role differences in a contemporary society. Sex Roles. 2002;47(9):443-452.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1021648426787

  36. 36.

    Berzins JI, Welling MA, Wetter RE. A new measure of psychological androgyny based on the Personality Research Form. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1978;46(1):126.

    Not in our library10.1037/0022-006x.46.1.126

  37. 37.

    Berger A, Krahé B. Negative attributes are gendered too: conceptualizing and measuring positive and negative facets of sex-role identity. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2013;43(6):516-531.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    Basu J. Development of the Indian Gender Role Identity Scale. J Indian Acad Appl Psychol. 2010;36(1):25-34.

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    O’Neil JM, Helms BJ, Gable RK, David L, Wrightsman LS. Gender-Role Conflict Scale: college men’s fear of femininity. Sex Roles. 1986;14(5–6):335-350.

    Not in our library

  40. 40.

    Thompson EH, Pleck JH. The structure of male role norms. Am Behav Sci. 1986;29(5):531-543.

    Not in our library10.1177/000276486029005003

All 85 references

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.