Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 31, 2026.

Stability of SARS-CoV-2 phylogenies

Yatish Turakhia, Nicola De Maio, Bryan Thornlow and 11 more

PLOS Genetics · 2020 · CC BY

doi:10.1101/2020.06.08.141127

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to unprecedented, nearly real-time genetic tracing due to the rapid community sequencing response. Researchers immediately leveraged these data to infer the evolutionary relationships among viral samples and to study key biological questions, including whether host viral genome editing and recombination are features of SARS-CoV-2 evolution. This global sequencing effort is inherently decentralized and must rely on data collected by many labs using a wide variety of molecular and bioinformatic techniques. There is thus a strong possibility that systematic errors associated with lab—or protocol—specific practices affect some sequences in the repositories. We find that some recurrent mutations in reported SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences have been observed predominantly or exclusively by single labs, co-localize with commonly used primer binding sites and are more likely to affect the protein-coding sequences than other similarly recurrent mutations. We show that their inclusion can affect phylogenetic inference on scales relevant to local lineage tracing, and make it appear as though there has been an excess of recurrent mutation or recombination among viral lineages. We suggest how samples can be screened and problematic variants removed, and we plan to regularly inform the scientific community with our updated results as more SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences are shared ( https://virological.org/t/issues-with-sars-cov-2-sequencing-data/473 and https://virological.org/t/masking-strategies-for-sars-cov-2-alignments/480 ). We also develop tools for comparing and visualizing differences among very large phylogenies and we show that consistent clade- and tree-based comparisons can be made between phylogenies produced by different groups. These will facilitate evolutionary inferences and comparisons among phylogenies produced for a wide array of purposes. Building on the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Browser at UCSC, we present a toolkit to compare, analyze and combine SARS-CoV-2 phylogenies, find and remove potential sequencing errors and establish a widely shared, stable clade structure for a more accurate scientific inference and discourse.

References 79

  1. 1.

    NCBI Staff. NCBI Insights: INSDC Statement on SARS-CoV-2 sequence data sharing during COVID-19. 17 Aug 2020 [cited 26 Aug 2020]. Available: https://ncbiinsights.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2020/08/17/insdc-covid-data-sharing/

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    Maurano MT, Ramaswami S, Westby G, Zappile P, Dimartino D, Shen G, et al Sequencing identifies multiple, early introductions of SARS-CoV2 to New York City Region.

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.04.15.20064931

  3. 3.
  4. 4.

    Zhang Y-Z, Holmes EC. A Genomic Perspective on the Origin and Emergence of SARS-CoV-2. Cell. 2020;181:223–227.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.035

  5. 5.

    Bal A, Destras G, Gaymard A, Bouscambert-Duchamp M, Valette M, Escuret V, et al Molecular characterization of SARS-CoV-2 in the first COVID-19 cluster in France reveals an amino-acid deletion in nsp2 (Asp268Del).

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cmi.2020.03.020

  6. 6.

    Grubaugh ND, Ladner JT, Lemey P, Pybus OG, Rambaut A, Holmes EC, et al Tracking virus outbreaks in the twenty-first century. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:10–19.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41564-018-0296-2

  7. 7.

    Yi H. 2019 novel coronavirus is undergoing active recombination. Clin Infect Dis. 2020

    Not in our library10.1093/cid/ciaa219

  8. 8.

    Chaw S-M, Tai J-H, Chen S-L, Hsieh C-H, Chang S-Y, Yeh S-H, et al The origin and underlying driving forces of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12929-020-00665-8

  9. 9.

    van Dorp L, Acman M, Richard D, Shaw LP, Ford CE, Ormond L, et al Emergence of genomic diversity and recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2020 p. 104351

    Not in our library10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104351

  10. 10.

    Li Y, Wang Y, Qiu Y, Gong Z, Deng L, Pan M, et al SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein Receptor Binding Domain is Subject to Negative Selection with Predicted Positive Selection Mutations.

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.05.04.077842

  11. 11.

    Victorovich KV, Rajanish G, Aleksandrovna KT, Krishna KS, Nicolaevich SA, Vitoldovich PV. Translation-associated mutational U-pressure in the first ORF of SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses.

    Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2020.559165

  12. 12.

    Zehender G, Lai A, Bergna A, Meroni L, Riva A, Balotta C, et al GENOMIC CHARACTERISATION AND PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF SARS-COV-2 IN ITALY.

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.03.15.20032870

  13. 13.

    Gardy JL, Loman NJ. Towards a genomics-informed, real-time, global pathogen surveillance system. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19:9–20.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg.2017.88

  14. 14.
  15. 15.

    Adebali O, Bircan A, Circi D, Islek B, Kilinc Z, Selcuk B, et al Phylogenetic Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Genomes in Turkey.

    Not in our library10.3906/biy-2005-35

  16. 16.

    Hadfield J, Megill C, Bell SM, Huddleston J, Potter B, Callender C, et al Nextstrain: real-time tracking of pathogen evolution. Bioinformatics. 2018 pp. 4121–4123.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bty407

  17. 17.
  18. 18.

    Rambaut A, Holmes EC, Hill V, O’Toole Á, McCrone JT, Ruis C, et al A dynamic nomenclature proposal for SARS-CoV-2 to assist genomic epidemiology.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41564-020-0770-5

  19. 19.

    Mavian C, Marini S, Prosperi M, Salemi M. A snapshot of SARS-CoV-2 genome availability up to 30th March, 2020 and its implications.

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.04.01.020594

  20. 20.

    Fountain-Jones NM, Appaw RC, Carver S, Didelot X, Volz EM, Charleston M. Emerging phylogenetic structure of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. bioRxiv. 2020 p. 202005.19.103846.

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.05.19.103846

  21. 21.

    Bogner P, Capua I, Lipman DJ, Cox NJ. A global initiative on sharing avian flu data. Nature. 2006 pp. 981–981.

    Not in our library10.1038/442981a

  22. 22.

    Rayko M, Komissarov A. Quality control of low-frequency variants in SARS-CoV-2 genomes.

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.04.26.062422

  23. 23.

    Akther S, Bezrucenkovas E, Sulkow B, Panlasigui C. CoV Genome Tracker: tracing genomic footprints of Covid-19 pandemic. bioRxiv. 2020 Available: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.10.036343v1.abstract

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    DeMaio N, Walker C, Borges R, Weilguny L, Slodkowicz G, Goldman N. Issues with SARS-CoV-2 sequencing data. In: Virological [Internet]. 5 5 2020 [cited 13 May 2020]. Available: http://virological.org/t/issues-with-sars-cov-2-sequencing-data/473

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    Freeman TM, Genomics England Research Consortium, Wang D, Harris J. Genomic loci susceptible to systematic sequencing bias in clinical whole genomes. Genome Res. 2020;30: 415–426.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.255349.119

  26. 26.
  27. 27.

    Korber B, Fischer WM, Gnanakaran S, Yoon H, Theiler J, Abfalterer W, et al Spike mutation pipeline reveals the emergence of a more transmissible form of SARS-CoV-2.

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.04.29.069054

  28. 28.
  29. 29.

    Banerjee AK, Begum F, Ray U. Mutation Hot Spots in Spike Protein of COVID-19.

    Not in our library10.20944/preprints202004.0281.v1

  30. 30.

    Laamarti M, Alouane T, Kartti S, Chemao-Elfihri MW, Hakmi M, Essabbar A, et al Large scale genomic analysis of 3067 SARS-CoV-2 genomes reveals a clonal geo-distribution and a rich genetic variations of hotspots mutations.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0240345

  31. 31.

    Wang C, Liu Z, Chen Z, Huang X, Xu M, He T, et al The establishment of reference sequence for SARS-CoV-2 and variation analysis. Journal of Medical Virology. 2020 pp. 667–674.

    Not in our library10.1002/jmv.25762

  32. 32.

    Wang Y, Mao J-M, Wang G-D, Qiu Z, Yao Q, Chen K-P. Human SARS-CoV-2 has evolved to reduce CG dinucleotide in its open reading frames.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41598-020-69342-y

  33. 33.

    Wen F, Yu H, Guo J, Li Y, Luo K, Huang S. Identification of the hyper-variable genomic hotspot for the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. J Infect. 2020

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jinf.2020.02.027

  34. 34.
  35. 35.
  36. 36.

    Wertheim JO. A Glimpse Into the Origins of Genetic Diversity in the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2020

    Not in our library10.1093/cid/ciaa213

  37. 37.

    Vasilarou M, Alachiotis N, Garefalaki J, Beloukas A, Pavlidis P. Population genomics insights into the recent evolution of SARS-CoV-2.

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.04.21.054122

  38. 38.

    Ou J, Zhou Z, Dai R, Zhang J, Lan W, Zhao S, et al Emergence of RBD mutations in circulating SARS-CoV-2 strains enhancing the structural stability and human ACE2 receptor affinity of the spike protein. bioRxiv. 2020 p. 202003.15.991844.

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.03.15.991844

  39. 39.

    Sashittal P, Luo Y, Peng J, El-Kebir M. Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 viral diversity within and across hosts. bioRxiv. 2020 p. 202005.07.083410.

    Not in our library10.1101/2020.05.07.083410

  40. 40.

    Velazquez-Salinas L, Zarate S, Eberl S, Gladue DP, Novella I, Borca MV. Positive selection of ORF3a and ORF8 genes drives the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic.

    Not in our library10.3389/fmicb.2020.550674

All 79 references

Cited by papers we hold 4

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.