Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Nov 5, 2026.

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in previously undiagnosed health care workers in New Jersey, at the onset of the U.S. COVID-19 pandemic

Emily S. Barrett, Daniel B. Horton, Jason Roy and 10 more (opens in a new tab)

BMC Infectious Diseases · 2020 · CC BY

doi:10.1101/2020.04.20.20072470 (opens in a new tab)

Abstract

Background Healthcare workers (HCW) are presumed to be at increased risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection due to occupational exposure to infected patients. However, there has been little epidemiological research to assess these risks. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study of HCW ( n = 546) and non-healthcare workers (NHCW; n = 283) with no known prior SARS-CoV-2 infection who were recruited from a large U.S. university and two affiliated university hospitals. In this cross-sectional analysis of data collected at baseline, we examined SARS-CoV-2 infection status (as determined by presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in oropharyngeal swabs) by healthcare worker status and role. Results At baseline, 41 (5.0%) of the participants tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection, of whom 14 (34.2%) reported symptoms. The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was higher among HCW (7.3%) than in NHCW (0.4%), representing a 7.0% greater absolute risk (95% confidence interval for risk difference 4.7, 9.3%). The majority of infected HCW (62.5%) were nurses. Positive tests increased across the two weeks of cohort recruitment in line with rising confirmed cases in the hospitals and surrounding counties. Conclusions Overall, our results demonstrate that HCW had a higher prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection than NHCW. Continued follow-up of this cohort will enable us to monitor infection rates and examine risk factors for transmission.

References 19

  1. 1.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.2020.2648 (opens in a new tab)

  2. 2.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.5582/bst.2020.01043 (opens in a new tab)

  3. 3.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0233255 (opens in a new tab)

  4. 4.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1093/cid/ciaa287 (opens in a new tab)

  7. 7.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.2807/1560-7917.es.2020.25.12.2000334 (opens in a new tab)

  8. 8.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.2020.1585 (opens in a new tab)

  9. 9.
  10. 10.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.2020.3413 (opens in a new tab)

  11. 11.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.7326/m20-1301 (opens in a new tab)

  12. 12.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.2020.2565 (opens in a new tab)

  13. 13.
  14. 14.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1038/s41591-020-0869-5 (opens in a new tab)

  15. 15.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 (opens in a new tab)

  16. 16.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 1

Questions about this paper

We email you if it is retracted, withdrawn, corrected or flagged.

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.