No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 15, 2026.
SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis
F. Alexander Wolf, Philipp Angerer, Fabian J. Theis
Genome Biology · 2018
Abstract
SCANPY is a scalable toolkit for analyzing single-cell gene expression data. It includes methods for preprocessing, visualization, clustering, pseudotime and trajectory inference, differential expression testing, and simulation of gene regulatory networks. Its Python-based implementation efficiently deals with data sets of more than one million cells ( https://github.com/theislab/Scanpy ). Along with SCANPY, we present ANNDATA, a generic class for handling annotated data matrices ( https://github.com/theislab/anndata ).
Full text
From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 15, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.
Background
Simple integrated analysis work flows for single-cell transcriptomic data have been enabled by frameworks such as SEURAT, MONOCLE, SCDE/PAGODA, MAST, CELL RANGER, SCATER, and SCRAN. However, these frameworks do not scale to the increasingly available large data sets with up to and more than one million cells. Here, we present a framework that overcomes this limitation and provides similar analysis possibilities. Moreover, in contrast to the existing R-based frameworks, SCANPY’s Python-based implementation is easy to interface with advanced machine-learning packages, such as TENSORFLOW.
SCANPY integrates canonical analysis methods in a scalable way
SCANPY integrates the analysis possibilities of established R-based frameworks and provides them in a scalable and modular form. Specifically, SCANPY provides preprocessing comparable to SEURAT and CELL RANGER, visualization through TSNE, graph-drawing and diffusion maps, clustering similar to PHENOGRAPH, identification of marker genes for clusters via differential expression tests and pseudotemporal ordering via diffusion pseudotime, which compares favorably with MONOCLE 2, and WISHBONE (Fig. 1a).
SCANPY is benchmarked in comparisons with established packages
In a detailed clustering tutorial of 2700 peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), adapted from one of SEURAT’s tutorials (http://satijalab.org/seurat/pbmc3k_tutorial.html), all steps starting from raw count data to the identification of cell types are carried out, providing speedups between 5 and 90 times in each step (https://github.com/theislab/scanpy_usage/tree/master/170505_seurat). Benchmarking against the more run-time optimized CELL RANGER R kit, we demonstrate a speedup of 5 to 16 times for a data set of 68,579 PBMCs (Fig. 1a,b, https://github.com/theislab/scanpy_usage/tree/master/170503_zheng17). Moreover, we demonstrate the feasibility of analyzing 1.3 million cells without subsampling in a few hours of computing time on eight cores of a small computing server (Fig. 1c, https://github.com/theislab/scanpy_usage/tree/master/170522_visualizing_one_million_cells). Thus, SCANPY provides tools with speedups that enable an analysis of data sets with more than one million cells and an interactive analysis with run times of the order of seconds for about 100,000 cells.
In addition to the mentioned standard clustering-based analyses approaches, we demonstrate the reconstruction of branching developmental processes via diffusion pseudotime as in the original paper (https://github.com/theislab/scanpy_usage/tree/master/170502_haghverdi16), the simulation of single cells using literature-curated gene regulatory networks based on the ideas of (https://github.com/theislab/scanpy_usage/tree/master/170430_krumsiek11), and the analysis of deep-learning results for single-cell imaging data (https://github.com/theislab/scanpy_usage/tree/master/170529_images).
SCANPY introduces efficient modular implementation choices
With SCANPY, we introduce the class ANNDATA—with a corresponding package ANNDATA—which stores a data matrix with the most general annotations possible: annotations of observations (samples, cells) and variables (features, genes), and unstructured annotations. As SCANPY is built around that class, it is easy to add new functionality to the toolkit. All statistics and machine-learning tools extract information from a data matrix, which can be added to an ANNDATA object while leaving the structure of ANNDATA unaffected. ANNDATA is similar to R’s EXPRESSIONSET, but supports sparse data and allows HDF5-based backing of ANNDATA objects on disk, a format independent of platform, framework, and language. This allows operating on an ANNDATA object without fully loading it into memory—the functionality is offered via ANNDATA’s backed mode as opposed to its memory mode. To simplify memory-efficient pipelines, SCANPY’s functions operate in-place by default but allow the optional non-destructive transformation of objects. Pipelines written this way can then also be run in backed mode to exploit online-learning formulations of algorithms. Almost all of SCANPY’s tools are parallelized.
SCANPY introduces a class for representing a graph of neighborhood relations among data points. The computation of neighborhood relations is much faster than in the popular reference package. This is achieved by aggregating rows (observations) in a data matrix to submatrices and computing distances for each submatrix using fast parallelized matrix multiplication. Moreover, the class provides several functions to compute random-walk-based metrics that are not available in other graph software. Typically, SCANPY’s tools reuse a once-computed, single graph representation of data and hence, avoid the use of different, potentially inconsistent, and computationally expensive representations of data.
Conclusions
SCANPY’s scalability directly addresses the strongly increasing need for aggregating larger and larger data sets across different experimental setups, for example within challenges such as the Human Cell Atlas. Moreover, being implemented in a highly modular fashion, SCANPY can be easily developed further and maintained by a community. The transfer of the results obtained with different tools used within the community is simple, as SCANPY’s data storage formats and objects are language independent and cross-platform. SCANPY integrates well into the existing Python ecosystem, in which no comparable toolkit yet exists.
During the revision of this article, the loom file format (https://github.com/linnarsson-lab/loompy) was proposed for HDF5-based storage of annotated data. Within a joint effort of facilitating data exchange across different labs, ANNDATA now supports importing and exporting to loom (https://github.com/linnarsson-lab/loompy). In this context, we acknowledge the discussions with S. Linnarson, which motivated us to extend ANNDATA’s previously static to a dynamic HDF5 backing. Just before submission of this manuscript, a C++ library that provides simple interfacing of HDF5-backed matrices in R was made available as a preprint.
SCANPY’s technological foundations
SCANPY’s core relies on NUMPY, SCIPY, MATPLOTLIB, PANDAS, and H5PY. Parts of the toolkit rely on SCIKIT-LEARN, STATSMODELS, SEABORN, NETWORKX, IGRAPH, the TSNE package of, and the Louvain clustering package of. The ANNDATA class—available within the package ANNDATA—relies only on NUMPY, SCIPY, PANDAS, and H5PY.
SCANPY’s Python-based implementation allows easy interfacing to advanced machine-learning packages such as TENSORFLOW for deep learning, LIMIX for linear mixed models, and GPY/GPFLOW for Gaussian processes. However, we note that the Python ecosystem comes with less possibilities for classical statistical analyses compared to R.
Comparison with existing Python packages for single-cell analysis
Aside from the highly popular SCLVM (https://github.com/PMBio/scLVM), which uses Gaussian process latent variable models for inferring hidden sources of variation, there are, among others, the visualization frameworks FASTPROJECT (https://github.com/YosefLab/FastProject), ACCENSE (http://www.cellaccense.com/), and SPRING (https://github.com/AllonKleinLab/SPRING)—the latter uses the JavaScript package (http://d3js.org D3.js for the actual visualization and Python only for preprocessing—the trajectory inference tool SCIMITAR (https://github.com/dimenwarper/scimitar), the clustering tool PHENOGRAPH (https://github.com/jacoblevine/PhenoGraph), the single-cell experiment design tool MIMOSCA (https://github.com/asncd/MIMOSCA), UMIS (https://github.com/vals/umis) for handling raw read data, the tree-inference tool ECLAIR (https://github.com/GGiecold/ECLAIR), and the framework FLOTILLA (https://github.com/yeolab/flotilla), which comes with modules for simple visualization, simple clustering, and differential expression testing. Hence, only the latter provides a data analysis framework that solves more than one specific task. In contrast to SCANPY, however, FLOTILLA is neither targeted at single-cell nor at large-scale data and does not provide any graph-based methods, which are the core of SCANPY. Also, FLOTILLA is built around a complicated class STUDY, which contains data, tools, and plotting functions. SCANPY, by contrast, is built around a simple HDF5-backed class ANNDATA, which makes SCANPY both scalable and extendable (law of Demeter).
Availability and requirements
SCANPY’s and ANNDATA’s open-source code are maintained on GITHUB (https://github.com/theislab/scanpy, https://github.com/theislab/anndata) and published under the BSD3 license.
SCANPY and ANNDATA are released via the Python packaging index: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/scanpy and https://pypi.python.org/pypi/anndata.
Demonstrations and benchmarks discussed in the main text are all stored at https://github.com/theislab/scanpy_usageand summarized here: Analyzing 68,579 PBMCs (Fig. 1) in a comparison with the Cell Ranger R kit: https://github.com/theislab/scanpy_usage/tree/master/170503_zheng17.Clustering and identifying cell types, adapted from and benchmarked with http://satijalab.org/seurat/pbmc3k_tutorial.htmland one of Seurat’s tutorials: https://github.com/theislab/scanpy_usage/tree/master/170505_seurat.Visualizing and clustering 1.3 million cells (Fig. 1c): https://github.com/theislab/scanpy_usage/tree/master/170522_visualizing_one_million_cells.Reconstructing branching processes via diffusion pseudotime: https://github.com/theislab/scanpy_usage/tree/master/170502_haghverdi16.Simulating single cells using gene regulatory networks: https://github.com/theislab/scanpy_usage/tree/master/170430_krumsiek11.Analyzing deep-learning results for single-cell images: https://github.com/theislab/scanpy_usage/tree/master/170529_images.
Analyzing 68,579 PBMCs (Fig. 1) in a comparison with the Cell Ranger R kit: https://github.com/theislab/scanpy_usage/tree/master/170503_zheng17.
Clustering and identifying cell types, adapted from and benchmarked with http://satijalab.org/seurat/pbmc3k_tutorial.htmland one of Seurat’s tutorials: https://github.com/theislab/scanpy_usage/tree/master/170505_seurat.
Visualizing and clustering 1.3 million cells (Fig. 1c): https://github.com/theislab/scanpy_usage/tree/master/170522_visualizing_one_million_cells.
Reconstructing branching processes via diffusion pseudotime: https://github.com/theislab/scanpy_usage/tree/master/170502_haghverdi16.
Simulating single cells using gene regulatory networks: https://github.com/theislab/scanpy_usage/tree/master/170430_krumsiek11.
Analyzing deep-learning results for single-cell images: https://github.com/theislab/scanpy_usage/tree/master/170529_images.
The data sets used in demonstrations and benchmarks are three data sets from 10x Genomics.
Programming language: Python
Operating system: Linux, Mac OS and Windows
References 52
- 1.
Wagner A, Regev A, Yosef N. Revealing the vectors of cellular identity with single-cell genomics. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34:1145-60.
Not in our library10.1038/nbt.3711
- 2.
Satija R, Farrell JA, Gennert D, Schier AF, Regev A. Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33:495-502.
Not in our library10.1038/nbt.3192
- 3.
Trapnell C, et al. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:381-6.
Not in our library10.1038/nbt.2859
- 4.
Kharchenko PV, Silberstein L, Scadden DT, Bayesian approach to single-cell differential expression analysis. Nat Methods. 2014;11:740-2.
Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.2967
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
Abadi M, et al.TensorFlow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems. 2015. https://www.tensorflow.org/about/bib.
Not in our library
- 10.
Macosko EZ, et al. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell. 2015;161:1202-14.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.002
- 11.
Coifman RR, et al. Geometric diffusions as a tool for harmonic analysis and structure definition of data: diffusion maps. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2005;102:7426-31.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0500334102
- 12.
Amir EAD, Davis KL, Tadmor MD, Simonds EF, Levine JH, Bendall SC, et al. viSNE enables visualization of high dimensional single-cell data and reveals phenotypic heterogeneity of leukemia. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:545-52.
Not in our library10.1038/nbt.2594
- 13.
Reingold EM. Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Softw Pract Exp. 1991;21:1129-64.
Not in our library10.1002/spe.4380211102
- 14.
Csardi G, Nepusz T. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal Compl Syst. 2006;2006:1695.
Not in our library
- 15.
Weinreb C, Wolock S, Klein A. Spring: a kinetic interface for visualizing high dimensional single-cell expression data. bioRxiv. 2017. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx792.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btx792
- 16.
Buettner F, Theis FJ. Diffusion maps for high-dimensional single-cell analysis of differentiation data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:2989-98.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btv325
- 17.
Angerer P, et al. destiny: diffusion maps for large-scale single-cell data in R. Bioinformatics. 2015;32:1241.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btv715
- 18.
Blondel VD, Guillaume J-L, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech. 2008;2008:P10008.
Not in our library10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/p10008
- 19.
Levine JH, et al. Data-driven phenotypic dissection of AML reveals progenitor-like cells that correlate with prognosis. Cell. 2015;162:184-97.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.047
- 20.
Xu C, Su Z. Identification of cell types from single-cell transcriptomes using a novel clustering method. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:1974-80.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btv088
- 21.
Haghverdi L, Buttner, M̈, Wolf FA, Buettner F, Theis FJ. Diffusion pseudotime robustly reconstructs branching cellular lineages. Nat Methods. 2016;13:845-8.
Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.3971
- 22.
Qiu X, et al. Reversed graph embedding resolves complex single-cell trajectories. Nat Methods. 2017;14:979-82.
Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.4402
- 23.
Setty, M, et al. Wishbone identifies bifurcating developmental trajectories from single-cell data. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34:637-45.
Not in our library10.1038/nbt.3569
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
Huber, W, et al. Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with Bioconductor. Nat Methods. 2015;12:115-21.
Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.3252
- 27.
Pedregosa F, et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res. 2011;12:2825-30.
Not in our library
- 28.
Hagberg AA, Schult DA, Swart PJ. Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using networkx. In: Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy2008). Pasadena: 2008. p. 11–15.
Not in our library
- 29.
Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. 2009.
Not in our library
- 30.
Angerer, P, et al. Single cells make big data: new challenges and opportunities in transcriptomics. Curr Opin Syst Biol. 2017;4:85-91.
Not in our library10.1016/j.coisb.2017.07.004
- 31.
- 32.
Lun ATL, Pages̀ H, Smith ML. beachmat: a Bioconductor C++ API for accessing single-cell genomics data from a variety of R matrix types. bioRxiv. 2017. 10.1101/167445.
Not in our library
- 33.
van der Walt S, Colbert SC, Varoquaux G. The NumPy array: a structure for efficient numerical computation. Comput Sci Eng. 2011;13:22-30.
Not in our library10.1109/mcse.2011.37
- 34.
Jones E, Oliphant T, Peterson P, et al.SciPy: open source scientific tools for Python. 2001. https://www.scipy.org/citing.html.
Not in our library
- 35.
Hunter JD. Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng. 2007;9:90-5.
Not in our library10.1109/mcse.2007.55
- 36.
McKinney W. Data structures for statistical computing in Python In: van der Walt S, Millman J, editors. Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference: 2010. p. 51–6.
Not in our library
- 37.
Collette A. Python and HDF5. 2013.
Not in our library
- 38.
Seabold S, Perktold J. Statsmodels: econometric and statistical modeling with Python. 9th Python in Science Conference. 2010.
Not in our library
- 39.
Waskom, M, et al. In: Varoquaux G, Vaught T, Millman J, (eds).Seaborn; 2016. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12710, https://networkx.github.io/documentation/networkx-1.10/reference/citing.html.
Not in our library
- 40.
Ulyanov D. Multicore-tsne. 2016. https://github.com/DmitryUlyanov/Multicore-TSNE.
Not in our library
Cited by papers we hold 240
- Spatiotemporal profiling reveals the impact of caloric restriction in the aging mammalian brain · 2025Not checked
- Engineered heart muscle allografts for heart repair in primates and humans · 2025No notice
- Integrative multiomics analysis reveals the subtypes and key mechanisms of platinum resistance in gastric cancer: identification of KLF9 as a promising therapeutic target · 2025Not checked
- Triggering AHR resolves TGF-β1 induced fibroblast activation and promotes AT1 cell regeneration in alveolar organoids · 2025Not checked
- Mapping cells through time and space with moscot · 2025No notice
- Advances in spatial transcriptomics and its applications in cancer research · 2024No notice
- Deciphering spatial domains from spatial multi-omics with SpatialGlue · 2024No notice
- Assessing GPT-4 for cell type annotation in single-cell RNA-seq analysis · 2024No notice
- CellRank 2: unified fate mapping in multiview single-cell data · 2024No notice
- Mitochondrial complex I activity in microglia sustains neuroinflammation · 2024No notice
- Single-cell multiregion dissection of Alzheimer’s disease · 2024No notice
- Human skeletal muscle aging atlas · 2024No notice
- Spatial transcriptomics reveals discrete tumour microenvironments and autocrine loops within ovarian cancer subclones · 2024No notice
- Evolution of myeloid-mediated immunotherapy resistance in prostate cancer · 2024No notice
- Rapid functional impairment of natural killer cells following tumor entry limits anti-tumor immunity · 2024No notice
- Human SARS-CoV-2 challenge uncovers local and systemic response dynamics · 2024Corrected
- Generation of complex bone marrow organoids from human induced pluripotent stem cells · 2024No notice
- APOE4/4 is linked to damaging lipid droplets in Alzheimer’s disease microglia · 2024No notice
- An atlas of cells in the human tonsil · 2024No notice
- A comparison of marker gene selection methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data · 2024No notice
and 220 more
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.