Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Nov 2, 2026.

Domain-General and Domain-Specific Patterns of Activity Supporting Metacognition in Human Prefrontal Cortex

Jorge Morales, Hakwan Lau, Stephen M. Fleming

The Journal of Neuroscience · 2018 · CC BY-NC-SA

doi:10.1101/172445

Abstract

Metacognition is the capacity to evaluate the success of one's own cognitive processes in various domains; for example, memory and perception. It remains controversial whether metacognition relies on a domain-general resource that is applied to different tasks or if self-evaluative processes are domain specific. Here, we investigated this issue directly by examining the neural substrates engaged when metacognitive judgments were made by human participants of both sexes during perceptual and memory tasks matched for stimulus and performance characteristics. By comparing patterns of fMRI activity while subjects evaluated their performance, we revealed both domain-specific and domain-general metacognitive representations. Multivoxel activity patterns in anterior prefrontal cortex predicted levels of confidence in a domain-specific fashion, whereas domain-general signals predicting confidence and accuracy were found in a widespread network in the frontal and posterior midline. The demonstration of domain-specific metacognitive representations suggests the presence of a content-rich mechanism available to introspection and cognitive control. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We used human neuroimaging to investigate processes supporting memory and perceptual metacognition. It remains controversial whether metacognition relies on a global resource that is applied to different tasks or if self-evaluative processes are specific to particular tasks. Using multivariate decoding methods, we provide evidence that perceptual- and memory-specific metacognitive representations coexist with generic confidence signals. Our findings reconcile previously conflicting results on the domain specificity/generality of metacognition and lay the groundwork for a mechanistic understanding of metacognitive judgments.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 73

  1. 1.

    Ais J, Zylberberg A, Barttfeld P, Sigman M (2016 ) Individual consistency in the accuracy and distribution of confidence judgments. Cognition 146:377–386.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.006

  2. 2.

    Andersson JL, Hutton C, Ashburner J, Turner R, Friston K (2001 ) Modeling geometric deformations in EPI time series. Neuroimage 13:903–919.

    Not in our library10.1006/nimg.2001.0746

  3. 3.

    Ashburner J, Friston KJ (2005 ) Unified segmentation. Neuroimage 26:839–851.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018

  4. 4.

    Baird B, Smallwood J, Gorgolewski KJ, Margulies DS (2013 ) Medial and lateral networks in anterior prefrontal cortex support metacognitive ability for memory and perception. J Neurosci 33:16657–16665.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.0786-13.2013

  5. 5.

    Bhandari A, Gagne C, Badre D (2017 ) Just above chance: is it harder to decode information from human prefrontal cortex BOLD signals? bioRxiv: 1–28.

    Not in our library10.1101/127324

  6. 6.

    Boldt A, Yeung N (2015 ) Shared neural markers of decision confidence and error detection. J Neurosci 35:3478–3484.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.0797-14.2015

  7. 7.

    Botvinick MM, Cohen JD, Carter CS (2004 ) Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends Cogn Sci 8:539–546.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.003

  8. 8.

    Brainard DH (1997 ) The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision 10:433–436.

    Not in our library10.1163/156856897x00357

  9. 9.

    Busey TA, Tunnicliff J, Loftus GR, Loftus EF (2000 ) Accounts of the confidence-accuracy relation in recognition memory. Psychon Bull Rev 7:26–48.

    Not in our library10.3758/bf03210724

  10. 10.

    Chua EF, Pergolizzi D, Weintraub RR (2014 ) The cognitive neuroscience of metamemory monitoring: understanding metamemory processes, subjective levels expressed, and metacognitive accuracy. In: The cognitive neuroscience of metacognition (Fleming SM, Frith CD, eds), pp 267–291. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Cole MW, Reynolds JR, Power JD, Repovs G, Anticevic A, Braver TS (2013 ) Multi-task connectivity reveals flexible hubs for adaptive task control. Nat Neurosci 16:1348–1355.

    Not in our library10.1038/nn.3470

  12. 12.

    Cole MW, Ito T, Braver TS (2016 ) The behavioral relevance of task information in human prefrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 26:2497–2505.

    Not in our library10.1093/cercor/bhv072

  13. 13.
  14. 14.

    Daniel R, Pollmann S (2012 ) Striatal activations signal prediction errors on confidence in the absence of external feedback. Neuroimage 59:3457–3467.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.058

  15. 15.

    de Gardelle V, Mamassian P (2014 ) Does confidence use a common currency across two visual tasks? Psychol Sci 25:1286–1288.

    Not in our library10.1177/0956797614528956

  16. 16.

    De Martino B, Fleming SM, Garrett N, Dolan RJ (2013 ) Confidence in value-based choice. Nat Neurosci 16:105–110.

    Not in our library10.1038/nn.3279

  17. 17.

    Donoso M, Collins AG, Koechlin E (2014 ) Foundations of human reasoning in the prefrontal cortex. Science 344:1481–1486.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1252254

  18. 18.

    Faivre N, Filevich E, Solovey G, Kühn S, Blanke O (2018 ) Behavioral, modeling, and electrophysiological evidence for supramodality in human metacognition. J Neurosci 38:263–277.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.0322-17.2017

  19. 19.

    Flavell JH (1979 ) Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. Am Psychol 34:906–911.

    Not in our library10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906

  20. 20.

    Fleck MS, Daselaar SM, Dobbins IG, Cabeza R (2006 ) Role of prefrontal and anterior cingulate regions in decision-making processes shared by memory and nonmemory tasks. Cereb Cortex 16:1623–1630.

    Not in our library10.1093/cercor/bhj097

  21. 21.
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.

    Fleming SM, Weil RS, Nagy Z, Dolan RJ, Rees G (2010 ) Relating introspective accuracy to individual differences in brain structure. Science 329:1541–1543.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1191883

  25. 25.
  26. 26.

    Fleming SM, Huijgen J, Dolan RJ (2012b ) Prefrontal contributions to metacognition in perceptual decision making. J Neurosci 32:6117–6125.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.6489-11.2012

  27. 27.
  28. 28.

    Galvin SJ, Podd JV, Drga V, Whitmore J (2003 ) Type 2 tasks in the theory of signal detectability: discrimination between correct and incorrect decisions. Psychon Bull Rev 10:843–876.

    Not in our library10.3758/bf03196546

  29. 29.

    García-Pérez MA (1998 ) Forced-choice staircases with fixed step sizes: asymptotic and small-sample properties. Vision Res 38:1861–1881.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00340-4

  30. 30.

    Gehring WJ, Goss B, Coles MGH, Meyer DE, Donchin E (1993 ) A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychol Sci 4:385–390.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00586.x

  31. 31.
  32. 32.

    Guggenmos M, Wilbertz G, Hebart MN, Sterzer P (2016 ) Mesolimbic confidence signals guide perceptual learning in the absence of external feedback. eLife 5:e13388.

    Not in our library10.7554/elife.13388

  33. 33.
  34. 34.

    Hebart MN, Schriever Y, Donner TH, Haynes JD (2016 ) The relationship between perceptual decision variables and confidence in the human brain. Cereb Cortex 26:118–130.

    Not in our library10.1093/cercor/bhu181

  35. 35.

    Heekeren HR, Marrett S, Ruff DA, Bandettini PA, Ungerleider LG (2006 ) Involvement of human left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in perceptual decision making is independent of response modality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:10023–10028.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0603949103

  36. 36.

    Heereman J, Walter H, Heekeren HR (2015 ) A task-independent neural representation of subjective certainty in visual perception. Front Hum Neurosci 9:551.

    Not in our library10.3389/fnhum.2015.00551

  37. 37.

    Hilgenstock R, Weiss T, Witte OW (2014 ) You'd better think twice: post-decision perceptual confidence. Neuroimage 99:323–331.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.049

  38. 38.

    Holroyd CB, Yeung N, Coles MG, Cohen JD (2005 ) A mechanism for error detection in speeded response time tasks. J Exp Psychol Gen 134:163–191.

    Not in our library10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.163

  39. 39.

    Insabato A, Pannunzi M, Rolls ET, Deco G (2010 ) Confidence-related decision making. J Neurophysiol 104:539–547.

    Not in our library10.1152/jn.01068.2009

  40. 40.

    Kamitani Y, Sawahata Y (2010 ) Spatial smoothing hurts localization but not information: pitfalls for brain mappers. Neuroimage 49:1949–1952.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.040

  41. 41.

    Kelemen WL, Frost PJ, Weaver CA 3rd (2000 ) Individual differences in metacognition: evidence against a general metacognitive ability. Mem Cognit 28:92–107.

    Not in our library10.3758/bf03211579

  42. 42.

    Kerns JG, Cohen JD, Stenger VA, Carter CS (2004 ) Prefrontal cortex guides context-appropriate responding during language production. Neuron 43:283–291.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2004.06.032

  43. 43.

    Kiani R, Shadlen MN (2009 ) Representation of confidence associated with a decision by neurons in the parietal cortex. Science 324:759–764.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1169405

  44. 44.

    Kruschke J (2010 ) Doing Bayesian data analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic.

    Not in our library

  45. 45.

    Lebreton M, Abitbol R, Daunizeau J, Pessiglione M (2015 ) Automatic integration of confidence in the brain valuation signal. Nat Neurosci 18:1159–1167.

    Not in our library10.1038/nn.4064

  46. 46.

    Macpherson F (2011 ) Introduction: individuating the senses. In: The senses (Macpherson F, ed), pp 3–42. Oxford, UK: OUP.

    Not in our library

  47. 47.

    Maniscalco B, Lau H (2012 ) A signal detection theoretic approach for estimating metacognitive sensitivity from confidence ratings. Conscious Cogn 21:422–430.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.021

  48. 48.

    Maniscalco B, McCurdy LY, Odegaard B, Lau H (2017 ) Limited cognitive resources explain a trade-off between perceptual and metacognitive vigilance. J Neurosci 37:1213–1224.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.2271-13.2016

  49. 49.

    McCurdy LY, Maniscalco B, Metcalfe J, Liu KY, de Lange FP, Lau H (2013 ) Anatomical coupling between distinct metacognitive systems for memory and visual perception. J Neurosci 33:1897–1906.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.1890-12.2013

  50. 50.

    Mendoza-Halliday D, Martinez-Trujillo JC (2017 ) Neuronal population coding of perceived and memorized visual features in the lateral prefrontal cortex. Nat Commun 8:15471.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms15471

  51. 51.

    Metcalfe J, Shimamura AP eds (1994 ) Metacognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Not in our library

  52. 52.

    Nelson DL, McEvoy CL, Schreiber TA (2004 ) The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 36:402–407.

    Not in our library10.3758/bf03195588

  53. 53.

    Nelson TO, Narens L (1990 ) Metamemory: a theoretical framework and new findings. In: The psychology of learning and motivation (Bower G, ed), pp 125–173. New York, NY: Academic.

    Not in our library

  54. 54.

    Op de Beeck HP (2010 ) Against hyperacuity in brain reading: spatial smoothing does not hurt multivariate fMRI analyses? Neuroimage 49:1943–1948.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.047

  55. 55.

    Overgaard M, Sandberg K (2012 ) Kinds of access: different methods for report reveal different kinds of metacognitive access. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 367:1287–1296.

    Not in our library10.1098/rstb.2011.0425

  56. 56.

    Poldrack RA, Baker CI, Durnez J, Gorgolewski KJ, Matthews PM, Munafò MR, Nichols TE, Poline JB, Vul E, Yarkoni T (2017 ) Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research. Nat Rev Neurosci 18:115–126.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrn.2016.167

  57. 57.

    Pouget A, Drugowitsch J, Kepecs A (2016 ) Confidence and certainty: distinct probabilistic quantities for different goals. Nat Neurosci 19:366–374.

    Not in our library10.1038/nn.4240

  58. 58.

    Purcell BA, Kiani R (2016 ) Hierarchical decision processes that operate over distinct timescales underlie choice and changes in strategy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E4531–E4540.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1524685113

  59. 59.

    Rahnev D, Koizumi A, McCurdy LY, D'Esposito M, Lau H (2015 ) Confidence leak in perceptual decision making. Psychol Sci 26:1664–1680.

    Not in our library10.1177/0956797615595037

  60. 60.

    R Studio Team (2015 ) RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Available from http://www.rstudio.com.

    Not in our library

  61. 61.

    Ridderinkhof KR, Ullsperger M, Crone EA, Nieuwenhuis S (2004 ) The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 306:443–447.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1100301

  62. 62.

    Rounis E, Maniscalco B, Rothwell JC, Passingham RE, Lau H (2010 ) Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation to the prefrontal cortex impairs metacognitive visual awareness. Cogn Neurosci 1:165–175.

    Not in our library10.1080/17588921003632529

  63. 63.

    Ruby E, Giles N, Lau H (2017 ) Finding domain-general metacognitive mechanisms requires using appropriate tasks. bioRxiv: 1–20.

    Not in our library10.1101/211805

  64. 64.

    Samaha J, Postle BR (2017 ) Correlated individual differences suggest a common mechanism underlying metacognition in visual perception and visual short-term memory. Proc Biol Sci 284:20172035.

    Not in our library10.1098/rspb.2017.2035

  65. 65.

    Scheffers MK, Coles MG (2000 ) Performance monitoring in a confusing world: error-related brain activity, judgments of response accuracy, and types of errors. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:141–151.

    Not in our library10.1037/0096-1523.26.1.141

  66. 66.

    Schnyer DM, Verfaellie M, Alexander MP, LaFleche G, Nicholls L, Kaszniak AW (2004 ) A role for right medial prefrontal cortex in accurate feeling-of-knowing judgments: evidence from patients with lesions to frontal cortex. Neuropsychologia 42:957–966.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.11.020

  67. 67.

    Shimamura AP, Squire LR (1986 ) Memory and metamemory: a study of the feeling-of-knowing phenomenon in amnesic patients. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 12:452–460.

    Not in our library10.1037/0278-7393.12.3.452

  68. 68.

    Simons JS, Peers PV, Mazuz YS, Berryhill ME, Olson IR (2010 ) Dissociation between memory accuracy and memory confidence following bilateral parietal lesions. Cereb Cortex 20:479–485.

    Not in our library10.1093/cercor/bhp116

  69. 69.

    Sladky R, Friston KJ, Tröstl J, Cunnington R, Moser E, Windischberger C (2011 ) Slice-timing effects and their correction in functional MRI. Neuroimage 58:588–594.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.078

  70. 70.

    Tang H, Yu HY, Chou CC, Crone NE, Madsen JR, Anderson WS, Kreiman G (2016 ) Cascade of neural processing orchestrates cognitive control in human frontal cortex. eLife 5:e12352.

    Not in our library10.7554/elife.12352

  71. 71.

    Vo VA, Li R, Kornell N, Pouget A, Cantlon JF (2014 ) Young children bet on their numerical skills: metacognition in the numerical domain. Psychol Sci 25:1712–1721.

    Not in our library10.1177/0956797614538458

  72. 72.

    Wilson M (1988 ) MRC psycholinguistic database: machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 20:6–10.

    Not in our library10.3758/bf03202594

  73. 73.

    Yokoyama O, Miura N, Watanabe J, Takemoto A, Uchida S, Sugiura M, Horie K, Sato S, Kawashima R, Nakamura K (2010 ) Right frontopolar cortex activity correlates with reliability of retrospective rating of confidence in short-term recognition memory performance. Neurosci Res 68:199–206.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neures.2010.07.2041

Cited by papers we hold 3

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.