Skip to content
naulon
Get started

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Nov 1, 2026.

Genomic landscape of oxidative DNA damage and repair reveals regioselective protection from mutagenesis

Anna R. Poetsch, Simon J. Boulton, Nicholas M. Luscombe

Genome Biology · 2018

doi:10.1101/168153

Abstract

Background. DNA is subject to constant chemical modification and damage, which eventually results in variable mutation rates throughout the genome. Although detailed molecular mechanisms of DNA damage and repair are well understood, damage impact and execution of repair across a genome remain poorly defined.

Results. To bridge the gap between our understanding of DNA repair and mutation distributions, we developed a novel method, AP-seq, capable of mapping apurinic sites and 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine bases at approximately 250-bp resolution on a genome-wide scale. We directly demonstrate that the accumulation rate of apurinic sites varies widely across the genome, with hot spots acquiring many times more damage than cold spots. Unlike single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in cancers, damage burden correlates with marks for open chromatin notably H3K9ac and H3K4me2. Apurinic sites and oxidative damage are also highly enriched in transposable elements and other repetitive sequences. In contrast, we observe a reduction at chromatin loop anchors with increased damage load towards inactive compartments. Less damage is found at promoters, exons, and termination sites, but not introns, in a seemingly transcription-independent but GC content-dependent manner. Leveraging cancer genomic data, we also find locally reduced SNV rates in promoters, coding sequence, and other functional elements.

Conclusions. Our study reveals that oxidative DNA damage accumulation and repair differ strongly across the genome, but culminate in a previously unappreciated mechanism that safeguards the regulatory and coding regions of genes from mutations.

Electronic supplementary material. The online version of this article (10.1186/s13059-018-1582-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References 97

  1. 1.

    Lindahl T. Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nature. 1993;362:709-715.

    Not in our library10.1038/362709a0

  2. 2.

    Swenberg JA, Lu K, Moeller BC, Gao L, Upton PB, Nakamura J, Starr TB. Endogenous versus exogenous DNA adducts: their role in carcinogenesis, epidemiology, and risk assessment. Toxicol Sci. 2011;120(Suppl 1):S130-S145.

    Not in our library10.1093/toxsci/kfq371

  3. 3.

    Muller N, Moreno-Villanueva M, Fischbach A, Kienhofer J, Martello R, Dedon PC, Ullrich V, Burkle A, Mangerich A. An automated Fpg-based FADU method for the detection of oxidative DNA lesions and screening of antioxidants. Toxicology. 2013;310:15-21.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tox.2013.05.006

  4. 4.

    Ravanat JL, Cadet J, Douki T. Oxidatively generated DNA lesions as potential biomarkers of in vivo oxidative stress. Curr Mol Med. 2012;12:655-671.

    Not in our library10.2174/156652412800792651

  5. 5.

    Allgayer J, Kitsera N, Bartelt S, Epe B, Khobta A. Widespread transcriptional gene inactivation initiated by a repair intermediate of 8-oxoguanine. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:7267-7280.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkw473

  6. 6.

    Larsen E, Kwon K, Coin F, Egly JM, Klungland A. Transcription activities at 8-oxoG lesions in DNA. DNA Repair (Amst). 2004;3:1457-1468.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.06.008

  7. 7.

    Khobta A, Anderhub S, Kitsera N, Epe B. Gene silencing induced by oxidative DNA base damage: association with local decrease of histone H4 acetylation in the promoter region. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:4285-4295.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkq170

  8. 8.

    Sedletska Y, Radicella JP, Sage E. Replication fork collapse is a major cause of the high mutation frequency at three-base lesion clusters. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:9339-9348.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkt731

  9. 9.

    Rhee DB, Ghosh A, Lu J, Bohr VA, Liu Y. Factors that influence telomeric oxidative base damage and repair by DNA glycosylase OGG1. DNA Repair (Amst). 2011;10:34-44.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.008

  10. 10.

    Shibutani S, Takeshita M, Grollman AP. Insertion of specific bases during DNA synthesis past the oxidation-damaged base 8-oxodG. Nature. 1991;349:431-434.

    Not in our library10.1038/349431a0

  11. 11.

    Chalissery J, Jalal D, Al-Natour Z, Hassan AH. Repair of oxidative DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst). 2017;51:2-13.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.dnarep.2016.12.010

  12. 12.

    Hamilton ML, Guo Z, Fuller CD, Van Remmen H, Ward WF, Austad SN, Troyer DA, Thompson I, Richardson A. A reliable assessment of 8-oxo-2-deoxyguanosine levels in nuclear and mitochondrial DNA using the sodium iodide method to isolate DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:2117–2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC55450/.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/29.10.2117

  13. 13.

    Rahimoff R, Kosmatchev O, Kirchner A, Pfaffeneder T, Spada F, Brantl V, Müller M, Carell T. 5-Formyl- and 5-carboxydeoxycytidines do not cause accumulation of harmful repair intermediates in stem cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139:10359-10364.

    Not in our library10.1021/jacs.7b04131

  14. 14.

    Boiteux S, Guillet M. Abasic sites in DNA: repair and biological consequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst). 2004;3:1-12.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.dnarep.2003.10.002

  15. 15.

    Sagher D, Strauss B. Insertion of nucleotides opposite apurinic/apyrimidinic sites in deoxyribonucleic acid during in vitro synthesis: uniqueness of adenine nucleotides. Biochemistry. 1983;22:4518-4526.

    Not in our library10.1021/bi00288a026

  16. 16.

    Loeb LA. Apurinic sites as mutagenic intermediates. Cell. 1985;40:483-484.

    Not in our library10.1016/0092-8674(85)90191-6

  17. 17.

    Ward JF. Complexity of damage produced by ionizing radiation. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2000;65:377-382.

    Not in our library10.1101/sqb.2000.65.377

  18. 18.

    Roots R, Okada S. Protection of DNA molecules of cultured mammalian cells from radiation-induced single-strand scissions by various alcohols and SH compounds. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1972;21:329-342.

    Not in our library10.1080/09553007214550401

  19. 19.

    Shirley L. Biomolecular action of ionizing radiation. 2007.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    Blakely WF, Fuciarelli AF, Wegher BJ, Dizdaroglu M. Hydrogen peroxide-induced base damage in deoxyribonucleic acid. Radiat Res. 1990;121:338-343.

    Not in our library10.2307/3577785

  21. 21.

    Kasai H, Crain PF, Kuchino Y, Nishimura S, Ootsuyama A, Tanooka H. Formation of 8-hydroxyguanine moiety in cellular DNA by agents producing oxygen radicals and evidence for its repair. Carcinogenesis. 1986;7:1849-1851.

    Not in our library10.1093/carcin/7.11.1849

  22. 22.

    Sutherland BM, Bennett PV, Sidorkina O, Laval J. Clustered DNA damages induced in isolated DNA and in human cells by low doses of ionizing radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:103-108.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.97.1.103

  23. 23.

    Kennedy LJ, Moore K, Caulfield JL, Tannenbaum SR, Dedon PC. Quantitation of 8-oxoguanine and strand breaks produced by four oxidizing agents. Chem Res Toxicol. 1997;10:386-392.

    Not in our library10.1021/tx960102w

  24. 24.

    Dizdaroglu M. Measurement of radiation-induced damage to DNA at the molecular level. Int J Radiat Biol. 1992;61:175-183.

    Not in our library10.1080/09553009214550791

  25. 25.

    Cairns J, Overbaugh J, Miller S. The origin of mutants. Nature. 1988;335:142-145.

    Not in our library10.1038/335142a0

  26. 26.

    Lenski RE, Mittler JE. The directed mutation controversy and neo-Darwinism. Science. 1993;259:188-194.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.7678468

  27. 27.

    Martincorena I, Seshasayee AS, Luscombe NM. Evidence of non-random mutation rates suggests an evolutionary risk management strategy. Nature. 2012;485:95-98.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature10995

  28. 28.

    Polak P, Karlić R, Koren A, Thurman R, Sandstrom R, Lawrence MS, Reynolds A, Rynes E, Vlahoviček K, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Sunyaev SR. Cell-of-origin chromatin organization shapes the mutational landscape of cancer. Nature. 2015;518:360-364.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature14221

  29. 29.

    Schuster-Bockler B, Lehner B. Chromatin organization is a major influence on regional mutation rates in human cancer cells. Nature. 2012;488:504-507.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11273

  30. 30.

    Katainen R, Dave K, Pitkänen E, Palin K, Kivioja T, Välimäki N, Gylfe AE, Ristolainen H, Hänninen UA, Cajuso T, Kondelin J, Tanskanen T, Mecklin JP, Järvinen H, Renkonen-Sinisalo L, Lepistö A, Kaasinen E, Kilpivaara O, Tuupanen S, Enge M, Taipale J, Aaltonen LA. CTCF/cohesin-binding sites are frequently mutated in cancer. Nat Genet. 2015;47:818-821.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.3335

  31. 31.

    Perera D, Poulos RC, Shah A, Beck D, Pimanda JE, Wong JW. Differential DNA repair underlies mutation hotspots at active promoters in cancer genomes. Nature. 2016;532:259-263.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature17437

  32. 32.

    Reijns MA, Kemp H, Ding J, de Procé SM, Jackson AP, Taylor MS. Lagging-strand replication shapes the mutational landscape of the genome. Nature. 2015;518:502-506.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature14183

  33. 33.

    Sabarinathan R, Mularoni L, Deu-Pons J, Gonzalez-Perez A, López-Bigas N. Nucleotide excision repair is impaired by binding of transcription factors to DNA. Nature. 2016;532:264-267.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature17661

  34. 34.

    Martincorena I, Luscombe NM. Non-random mutation: the evolution of targeted hypermutation and hypomutation. Bioessays. 2013;35:123-130.

    Not in our library10.1002/bies.201200150

  35. 35.

    Pastukh V, Roberts JT, Clark DW, Bardwell GC, Patel M, Al-Mehdi AB, Borchert GM, Gillespie MN. An oxidative DNA “damage” and repair mechanism localized in the VEGF promoter is important for hypoxia-induced VEGF mRNA expression. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2015;309:L1367-L1375.

    Not in our library10.1152/ajplung.00236.2015

  36. 36.

    Ding Y, Fleming AM, Burrows CJ. Sequencing the mouse genome for the oxidatively modified base 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine by OG-Seq. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139:2569-2572.

    Not in our library10.1021/jacs.6b12604

  37. 37.

    Wu J, Mckeague M, Sturla SJ. Nucleotide-resolution genome-wide mapping of oxidative DNA damage by click-code-seq. J Am Chem Soc. 2018; 10.1021/jacs.8b03715.

    Not in our library10.1021/jacs.8b03715

  38. 38.

    Ohno M, Miura T, Furuichi M, Tominaga Y, Tsuchimoto D, Sakumi K, Nakabeppu Y. A genome-wide distribution of 8-oxoguanine correlates with the preferred regions for recombination and single nucleotide polymorphism in the human genome. Genome Res. 2006;16:567-575.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.4769606

  39. 39.

    Yoshihara M, Jiang L, Akatsuka S, Suyama M, Toyokuni S. Genome-wide profiling of 8-oxoguanine reveals its association with spatial positioning in nucleus. DNA Res. 2014;21:603-612.

    Not in our library10.1093/dnares/dsu023

  40. 40.

    Mitchell DL, Meador J, Paniker L, Gasparutto D, Jeffrey WH, Cadet J. Development and application of a novel immunoassay for measuring oxidative DNA damage in the environment. Photochem Photobiol. 2002;75:257-265.

    Not in our library10.1562/0031-8655(2002)075<0257:daaoan>2.0.co;2

  41. 41.

    Serrano J, Palmeira CM, Wallace KB, Kuehl DW. Determination of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine in biological tissue by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 1996;10:1789-1791.

    Not in our library10.1002/(sici)1097-0231(199611)10:14<1789::aid-rcm752>3.0.co;2-6

  42. 42.

    Kubo K, Ide H, Wallace SS, Kow YW. A novel, sensitive, and specific assay for abasic sites, the most commonly produced DNA lesion. Biochemistry. 1992;31:3703-3708.

    Not in our library10.1021/bi00129a020

  43. 43.

    Nakamura J, Walker VE, Upton PB, Chiang SY, Kow YW, Swenberg JA. Highly sensitive apurinic/apyrimidinic site assay can detect spontaneous and chemically induced depurination under physiological conditions. Cancer Res. 1998;58:222-225.

    Not in our library

  44. 44.
    A method for detecting abasic sites in living cells: Age-dependent changes in base excision repair · 2000
    Not checked
  45. 45.

    Nakano T, Terato H, Yoshioka Y, Ohyama Y, Kubo K, Ide H. Detection of NO-induced DNA lesions by the modified aldehyde reactive probe (ARP) assay. Nucleic Acids Res Suppl. 2002:239–40.

    Not in our library10.1093/nass/2.1.239

  46. 46.

    Roberts KP, Sobrino JA, Payton J, Mason LB, Turesky RJ. Determination of apurinic/apyrimidinic lesions in DNA with high-performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. Chem Res Toxicol. 2006;19:300-309.

    Not in our library10.1021/tx0502589

  47. 47.
    Genome-wide distribution of 5-formylcytosine in embryonic stem cells is associated with transcription and depends on thymine DNA glycosylase · 2012
    No notice
  48. 48.

    Song CX, Szulwach KE, Dai Q, Fu Y, Mao SQ, Lin L, Street C, Li Y, Poidevin M, Wu H, Gao J, Liu P, Li L, Xu GL, Jin P, He C. Genome-wide profiling of 5-formylcytosine reveals its roles in epigenetic priming. Cell. 2013;153:678-691.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.001

  49. 49.

    Bachman M, Uribe-Lewis S, Yang X, Burgess HE, Iurlaro M, Reik W, Murrell A, Balasubramanian S. 5-Formylcytosine can be a stable DNA modification in mammals. Nat Chem Biol. 2015;11:555-557.

    Not in our library10.1038/nchembio.1848

  50. 50.

    Gackowski D, Zarakowska E, Starczak M, Modrzejewska M, Olinski R. Tissue-specific differences in DNA modifications (5-hydroxymethylcytosine, 5-formylcytosine, 5-carboxylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethyluracil) and their interrelationships. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0144859.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0144859

  51. 51.

    Baubec T, Colombo DF, Wirbelauer C, Schmidt J, Burger L, Krebs AR, Akalin A, Schübeler D. Genomic profiling of DNA methyltransferases reveals a role for DNMT3B in genic methylation. Nature. 2015;520:243-247.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature14176

  52. 52.

    Sassa A, Beard WA, Prasad R, Wilson SH. DNA sequence context effects on the glycosylase activity of human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:36702-36710.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m112.397786

  53. 53.

    Ba X, Aguilera-Aguirre L, Rashid QT, Bacsi A, Radak Z, Sur S, Hosoki K, Hegde ML, Boldogh I. The role of 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase-1 in inflammation. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15:16975-16997.

    Not in our library10.3390/ijms150916975

  54. 54.

    Bilotti K, Kennedy EE, Li C, Delaney S. Human OGG1 activity in nucleosomes is facilitated by transient unwrapping of DNA and is influenced by the local histone environment. DNA Repair (Amst). 2017;59:1-8.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.dnarep.2017.08.010

  55. 55.

    Mao P, Brown AJ, Malc EP, Mieczkowski PA, Smerdon MJ, Roberts SA, Wyrick JJ. Genome-wide maps of alkylation damage, repair, and mutagenesis in yeast reveal mechanisms of mutational heterogeneity. Genome Res. 2017;27:1674-1684.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.225771.117

  56. 56.

    Burns KH. Transposable elements in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:415-424.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc.2017.35

  57. 57.

    Sahakyan AB, Murat P, Mayer C, Balasubramanian S. G-quadruplex structures within the 3′ UTR of LINE-1 elements stimulate retrotransposition. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2017;24:243-247.

    Not in our library10.1038/nsmb.3367

  58. 58.

    Lavie L, Maldener E, Brouha B, Meese EU, Mayer J. The human L1 promoter: variable transcription initiation sites and a major impact of upstream flanking sequence on promoter activity. Genome Res. 2004;14:2253-2260.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.2745804

  59. 59.

    Liu N, Lee CH, Swigut T, Grow E, Gu B, Bassik M, Wysocka J. Selective silencing of euchromatic L1s revealed by genome-wide screens for L1 regulators. Nature. 2017;553:228–32. 10.1038/nature25179.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature25179

  60. 60.

    McClintock B. The origin and behavior of mutable loci in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1950;36:344-355.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.36.6.344

  61. 61.

    Farkash EA, Kao GD, Horman SR, Prak ET. Gamma radiation increases endonuclease-dependent L1 retrotransposition in a cultured cell assay. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:1196-1204.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkj522

  62. 62.

    Kwok CK, Marsico G, Sahakyan AB, Chambers VS, Balasubramanian S. rG4-seq reveals widespread formation of G-quadruplex structures in the human transcriptome. Nat Methods. 2016;13:841-844.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.3965

  63. 63.

    Henderson E, Hardin CC, Walk SK, Tinoco I, Blackburn EH. Telomeric DNA oligonucleotides form novel intramolecular structures containing guanine-guanine base pairs. Cell. 1987;51:899-908.

    Not in our library10.1016/0092-8674(87)90577-0

  64. 64.

    Bochman ML, Paeschke K, Zakian VA. DNA secondary structures: stability and function of G-quadruplex structures. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13:770-780.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg3296

  65. 65.

    Fouquerel E, Lormand J, Bose A, Lee HT, Kim GS, Li J, Sobol RW, Freudenthal BD, Myong S, Opresko PL. Oxidative guanine base damage regulates human telomerase activity. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016;23:1092-1100.

    Not in our library10.1038/nsmb.3319

  66. 66.

    Bagshaw ATM. Functional mechanisms of microsatellite DNA in eukaryotic genomes. Genome Biol Evol. 2017;9:2428-2443.

    Not in our library10.1093/gbe/evx164

  67. 67.

    Poulos RC, Thoms JAI, Guan YF, Unnikrishnan A, Pimanda JE, Wong JWH. Functional mutations form at CTCF-cohesin binding sites in melanoma due to uneven nucleotide excision repair across the motif. Cell Rep. 2016;17:2865-2872.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2016.11.055

  68. 68.
    Identification of the elementary structural units of the DNA damage response · 2017
    No notice
  69. 69.

    Cheng KC, Cahill DS, Kasai H, Nishimura S, Loeb LA. 8-Hydroxyguanine, an abundant form of oxidative DNA damage, causes G----T and A----C substitutions. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:166-172.

    Not in our library

  70. 70.

    Campbell PJ. Getz G, Stuart JM, Korbel JO, Stein LD. ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Net. Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes. In: bioRxiv; 2017. 10.1101/162784.

    Not in our library

  71. 71.

    Lujan SA, Clausen AR, Clark AB, MacAlpine HK, MacAlpine DM, Malc EP, Mieczkowski PA, Burkholder AB, Fargo DC, Gordenin DA, Kunkel TA. Heterogeneous polymerase fidelity and mismatch repair bias genome variation and composition. Genome Res. 2014;24:1751-1764.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.178335.114

  72. 72.

    Frigola J, Sabarinathan R, Mularoni L, Muiños F, Gonzalez-Perez A, López-Bigas N. Reduced mutation rate in exons due to differential mismatch repair. Nat Genet. 2017;49:1684-1692.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.3991

  73. 73.

    Alexandrov LB, Nik-Zainal S, Wedge DC, Aparicio SA, Behjati S, Biankin AV, Bignell GR, Bolli N, Borg A, Børresen-Dale AL, Boyault S, Burkhardt B, Butler AP, Caldas C, Davies HR, Desmedt C, Eils R, Eyfjörd JE, Foekens JA, Greaves M, Hosoda F, Hutter B, Ilicic T, Imbeaud S, Imielinski M, Imielinsk M, Jäger N, Jones DT, Jones D, Knappskog S, Kool M, Lakhani SR, López-Otín C, Martin S, Munshi NC, Nakamura H, Northcott PA, Pajic M, Papaemmanuil E, Paradiso A, Pearson JV, Puente XS, Raine K, Ramakrishna M, Richardson AL, Richter J, Rosenstiel P, Schlesner M, Schumacher TN, Span PN, Teague JW, Totoki Y, Tutt AN, Valdés-Mas R, van Buuren MM, van ‘t Veer L, Vincent-Salomon A, Waddell N, Yates LR, Australian PCGI, ICGC BCC, ICGC MMML-SC, ICGC P, Zucman-Rossi J, Futreal PA, McDermott U, Lichter P, Meyerson M, Grimmond SM, Siebert R, Campo E, Shibata T, Pfister SM, Campbell PJ, Stratton MR. Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature. 2013;500:415-421.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature12477

  74. 74.

    Alexandrov LB, Kim J, Haradhvala NJ, Huang MN, Ng AWT, Boot A, Covington KR, Gordenin DA, Bergstrom E, Lopez-Bigas N, Klimczak LJ, McPherson JR, Morganella S, Sabarinathan R, Wheeler DA, Mustonen V, Getz G, Rozen SG, PCAWG Mutational Signatures Working Group, ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Net. The repertoire of mutational signatures in human cancer. bioRxiv. 2018; 10.1101/322859.

    Not in our library

  75. 75.

    Dvorak K, Payne CM, Chavarria M, Ramsey L, Dvorakova B, Bernstein H, Holubec H, Sampliner RE, Guy N, Condon A, Bernstein C, Green SB, Prasad A, Garewal HS. Bile acids in combination with low pH induce oxidative stress and oxidative DNA damage: relevance to the pathogenesis of Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut. 2007;56:763-771.

    Not in our library10.1136/gut.2006.103697

  76. 76.
    Genomic catastrophes frequently arise in esophageal adenocarcinoma and drive tumorigenesis · 2014
    No notice
  77. 77.

    Barnes DE, Lindahl T. Repair and genetic consequences of endogenous DNA base damage in mammalian cells. Annu Rev Genet. 2004;38:445-476.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.092448

  78. 78.

    Shinbrot E, Henninger EE, Weinhold N, Covington KR, Göksenin AY, Schultz N, Chao H, Doddapaneni H, Muzny DM, Gibbs RA, Sander C, Pursell ZF, Wheeler DA. Exonuclease mutations in DNA polymerase epsilon reveal replication strand specific mutation patterns and human origins of replication. Genome Res. 2014;24:1740-1750.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.174789.114

  79. 79.

    Fleming AM, Ding Y, Burrows CJ. Oxidative DNA damage is epigenetic by regulating gene transcription via base excision repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:2604-2609.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1619809114

  80. 80.

    Supek F, Lehner B. Clustered mutation signatures reveal that error-prone DNA repair targets mutations to active genes. Cell. 2017;170:534-547.e23.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.003

  81. 81.

    Supek F, Lehner B. Differential DNA mismatch repair underlies mutation rate variation across the human genome. Nature. 2015;521:81-84.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature14173

  82. 82.
    Validating the concept of mutational signatures with isogenic cell models · 2018
    No notice
  83. 83.

    Svejstrup JQ. The interface between transcription and mechanisms maintaining genome integrity. Trends Biochem Sci. 2010;35:333-338.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tibs.2010.02.001

  84. 84.

    Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357-359.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.1923

  85. 85.

    Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 GPDPS. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078-2079.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352

  86. 86.

    Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, Getz G, Mesirov JP. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:24-26.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.1754

  87. 87.

    Lawrence M, Gentleman R, Carey V. rtracklayer: an R package for interfacing with genome browsers. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1841-1842.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btp328

  88. 88.

    The ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012;489:57-74.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11247

  89. 89.
    ggbio: an R package for extending the grammar of graphics for genomic data · 2012
    No notice
  90. 90.

    Ramírez F, Ryan DP, Grüning B, Bhardwaj V, Kilpert F, Richter AS, Heyne S, Dündar F, Manke T. deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W160-W165.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkw257

  91. 91.

    Bedrat A, Lacroix L, Mergny JL. Re-evaluation of G-quadruplex propensity with G4Hunter. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:1746-1759.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkw006

  92. 92.

    Feuerbach L, Sieverling L, Deeg K, Ginsbach P, Hutter B, Buchhalter I, Northcott PA, Lichter P, Pfister SM, Jones DTW, Rippe K, Brors B. TelomereHunter: telomere content estimation and characterization from whole genome sequencing data. bioRxiv. 2016.

    Not in our library

  93. 93.

    Canela A, Maman Y, Jung S, Wong N, Callen E, Day A, Kieffer-Kwon KR, Pekowska A, Zhang H, Rao SSP, Huang SC, Mckinnon PJ, Aplan PD, Pommier Y, Aiden EL, Casellas R, Nussenzweig A. Genome organization drives chromosome fragility. Cell. 2017;170:507-521.e18.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2017.06.034

  94. 94.

    Sabarinathan R, Pich O, Martincorena I, Rubio-Perez C, Juul M, Wala J, Schumacher S, Shapira O, Sidiropoulos N, Waszak S, Tamborero D, Mularoni L, Rheinbay E, Hornshoj H, Deu-Pons J, Muinos F, Bertl J, Guo Q, Weischenfeldt J, Korbel JO, Getz G, Campbell PJ, Pedersen JS, Beroukhim R, Perez-Gonzalez A, Lopez-Bigas N. The whole-genome panorama of cancer drivers. bioRxiv. 2017.

    Not in our library

  95. 95.
    The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor · 2016
    No notice
  96. 96.

    Yu G, Wang LG, He QY. ChIPseeker: an R/Bioconductor package for ChIP peak annotation, comparison and visualization. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:2382-2383.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btv145

  97. 97.
    Genomic landscape of oxidative DNA damage and repair reveals regioselective protection from mutagenesis · 2018
    No notice

Cited by papers we hold 5

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.