SCoPE-MS: mass spectrometry of single mammalian cells quantifies proteome heterogeneity during cell differentiation

Abstract

References 54

1. 1.

   Dean M, Fojo T, Bates S. Tumour stem cells and drug resistance. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5(4):275-284.

   Not in our library10.1038/nrc1590

2. 2.

   Cohen AA, Geva-Zatorsky N, Eden E, Frenkel-Morgenstern M, Issaeva I, Sigal A, et al. Dynamic proteomics of individual cancer cells in response to a drug. Science. 2008;322(5907):1511-1516.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1160165

3. 3.

   Semrau S, van Oudenaarden A. Studying lineage decision-making in vitro: emerging concepts and novel tools. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2015;31:317-345.

   Not in our library10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100814-125300

4. 4.

   Symmons O, Raj A. Whats luck got to do with it: single cells, multiple fates, and biological nondeterminism. Mol Cell. 2016;62(5):788-802.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.023

5. 5.

   Levy E, Slavov N. Single cell protein analysis for systems biology. Essays Biochem. 2018;62. 10.1042/EBC20180014.

   Not in our library10.1042/ebc20180014

6. 6.

   Landgraf D, Okumus B, Chien P, Baker TA, Paulsson J. Segregation of molecules at cell division reveals native protein localization. Nat Methods. 2012;9(5):480-482.

   Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.1955

7. 7.

   Bandura DR, Baranov VI, Ornatsky OI, Antonov A, Kinach R, Lou X, et al. Mass cytometry: technique for real time single cell multitarget immunoassay based on inductively coupled plasma time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2009;81(16):6813-6822.

   Not in our library10.1021/ac901049w

8. 8.

   Bendall SC, Simonds EF, Qiu P, El-ad DA, Krutzik PO, Finck R, et al. Single-cell mass cytometry of differential immune and drug responses across a human hematopoietic continuum. Science. 2011;332(6030):687-696.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1198704

9. 9.

   Hughes AJ, Spelke DP, Xu Z, Kang CC, Schaffer DV, Herr AE. Single-cell western blotting. Nat Methods. 2014;11(7):749-755.

   Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.2992

10. 10.

    Darmanis S, Gallant CJ, Marinescu VD, Niklasson M, Segerman A, Flamourakis G, et al. Simultaneous multiplexed measurement of RNA and proteins in single cells. Cell Rep. 2016;14(2):380-389.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.021

11. 11.

    Marcon E, Jain H, Bhattacharya A, Guo H, Phanse S, Pu S, et al. Assessment of a method to characterize antibody selectivity and specificity for use in immunoprecipitation. Nat Methods. 2015;12(8):725.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.3472

12. 12.

    Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature. 2003;422(6928):198-207.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature01511

13. 13.

    De Godoy LM, Olsen JV, Cox J, Nielsen ML, Hubner NC, Fröhlich F, et al. Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast. Nature. 2008;455(7217):1251.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature07341

14. 14.

    Cox J, Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized ppb range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(12):1367-1372.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.1511

15. 15.
    Constant Growth Rate Can Be Supported by Decreasing Energy Flux and Increasing Aerobic Glycolysis · 2014

    Not checked
16. 16.

    Wilhelm M, Schlegl J, Hahne H, Gholami A, Lieberenz M, et al. Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome. Nature. 2014;509:582-587.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature13319

17. 17.

    van den Berg PR, Budnik B, Slavov N, Semrau S. Dynamic post-transcriptional regulation during embryonic stem cell differentiation. bioRxiv. 2017;1. 10.1101/123497.

    Not in our library

18. 18.

    Nesvizhskii AI. Proteogenomics: concepts, applications and computational strategies. Nat Methods. 2014;11(11):1114.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.3144

19. 19.

    Milo R, Jorgensen P, Moran U, Weber G, Springer M. BioNumbers—the database of key numbers in molecular and cell biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:D750-D753.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkp889

20. 20.

    Schwanhäusser B, Busse D, Li N, Dittmar G, Schuchhardt J, Wolf J, et al. Corrigendum: global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature. 2013;495:126127.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11848

21. 21.

    Zubarev RA, Makarov A. Orbitrap mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2013;85(11):5288-5296.

    Not in our library10.1021/ac4001223

22. 22.

    Specht H, Slavov N. Transformative opportunities for single-cell proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2018;17:2563-2916.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00257

23. 23.

    Dhabaria A, Cifani P, Reed C, Steen H, Kentsis A. A high-efficiency cellular extraction system for biological proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2015;14(8):3403-3408.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00547

24. 24.
    Ultrasensitive proteome analysis using paramagnetic bead technology · 2014

    No notice
25. 25.

    Kulak NA, Pichler G, Paron I, Nagaraj N, Mann M. Minimal, encapsulated proteomic sample processing applied to copy-number estimation in eukaryotic cells. Nat Methods. 2014;11(3):319.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.2834

26. 26.

    Sielaff M, Kuharev J, Bohn T, Hahlbrock J, Bopp T, Tenzer S, et al. Evaluation of FASP, SP3, and iST protocols for proteomic sample preparation in the low microgram range. J Proteome Res. 2017;16(11):4060-4072.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00433

27. 27.

    Virant-Klun I, Leicht S, Hughes C, Krijgsveld J. Identification of maturation-specific proteins by single-cell proteomics of human oocytes. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2016;15(8):2616-2627.

    Not in our library10.1074/mcp.m115.056887

28. 28.

    Li S, Plouffe BD, Belov AM, Ray S, Wang X, Murthy SK, et al. An integrated platform for isolation, processing, and mass spectrometry-based proteomic profiling of rare cells in whole blood. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2015;14(6):1672-1683.

    Not in our library10.1074/mcp.m114.045724

29. 29.

    Lombard-Banek C, Moody SA, Nemes P. Single-cell mass spectrometry for discovery proteomics: quantifying translational cell heterogeneity in the 16-cell frog (Xenopus) embryo. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2016;55(7):2454-2458.

    Not in our library10.1002/anie.201510411

30. 30.

    Eng JK, McCormack AL, Yates JR. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 1994;5(11):976-989.

    Not in our library10.1016/1044-0305(94)80016-2

31. 31.

    Sinitcyn P, Rudolph JD, Cox J. Computational methods for understanding mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics data. Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. 2018;1:207-234.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013516

32. 32.

    Thompson A, Schäfer J, Kuhn K, Kienle S, Schwarz J, Schmidt G, et al. Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal Chem. 2003;75(8):1895-1904.

    Not in our library10.1021/ac0262560

33. 33.

    Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN, Williamson B, Parker K, Hattan S, et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2004;3(12):1154-1169.

    Not in our library10.1074/mcp.m400129-mcp200

34. 34.

    Slavov Nikolai, Semrau Stefan, Airoldi Edoardo, Budnik Bogdan, van Oudenaarden Alexander. Differential Stoichiometry among Core Ribosomal Proteins. Cell Reports. 2015;13(5):865-873.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.056

35. 35.

    Savitski MM, Mathieson T, Zinn N, Sweetman G, Doce C, Becher I, et al. Measuring and managing ratio compression for accurate iTRAQ/TMT quantification. J Proteome Res. 2013;12(8):3586-3598.

    Not in our library10.1021/pr400098r

36. 36.
    Mass Spectrometry-based Proteomics Using Q Exactive, a High-performance Benchtop Quadrupole Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer · 2011

    No notice
37. 37.

    Meier F, Beck S, Grassl N, Lubeck M, Park MA, Raether O, et al. Parallel accumulation–serial fragmentation (PASEF): multiplying sequencing speed and sensitivity by synchronized scans in a trapped ion mobility device. J Proteome Res. 2015;14(12):5378-5387.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00932

38. 38.
    SCoPE-MS: mass spectrometry of single mammalian cells quantifies proteome heterogeneity during cell differentiation · 2018

    No notice
39. 39.
    SCoPE-MS: mass spectrometry of single mammalian cells quantifies proteome heterogeneity during cell differentiation · 2018

    No notice
40. 40.
    Post-transcriptional regulation across human tissues · 2017

    No notice
41. 41.

    Hicks SC, Teng M, Irizarry RA. On the widespread and critical impact of systematic bias and batch effects in single-cell RNA-Seq data. bioRxiv. 2015;1:025528.

    Not in our library

42. 42.

    Slavov N, Dawson KA. Correlation signature of the macroscopic states of the gene regulatory network in cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106(11):4079-4084.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0810803106

43. 43.

    Mauro VP, Edelman GM. The ribosome filter hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002;99(19):12031-12036.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.192442499

44. 44.

    Preiss Thomas. All Ribosomes Are Created Equal. Really? Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2016;41(2):121-123.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tibs.2015.11.009

45. 45.

    Emmott EP, Jovanovic M, Slavov N. Ribosome stoichiometry: from form to function. Peer J Preprints. 2018;6:e26991v1.

    Not in our library10.7287/peerj.preprints.26991v1

46. 46.

    Wool IG. Extraribosomal functions of ribosomal proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 1996;21(5):164-165.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0968-0004(96)20011-8

47. 47.

    Klein AM, Mazutis L, Akartuna I, Tallapragada N, Veres A, Li V, et al. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell. 2015;161(5):1187-1201.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.044

48. 48.

    Silverman SJ, Petti AA, Slavov N, Parsons L, Briehof R, Thiberge SY, et al. Metabolic cycling in single yeast cells from unsynchronized steady-state populations limited on glucose or phosphate. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107(15):6946-6951.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1002422107

49. 49.

    Chen A, Franks A, Slavov N. DART-ID increases single-cell proteome coverage. bioRxiv. 2018. 10.1101/399121.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007082

50. 50.

    Specht H, Harmange G, Perlman DH, Emmott E, Niziolek Z, Budnik B, Slavov N. Automated sample preparation for high-throughput single-cell proteomics. bioRxiv. 2018. 10.1101/399774.

    Not in our library

51. 51.

    Cox J, Neuhauser N, Michalski A, Scheltema RA, Olsen JV, Mann M. Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. J Proteome Res. 2011;10(4):1794-1805.

    Not in our library10.1021/pr101065j

52. 52.

    Tyanova S, Temu T, Cox J. The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. Nat Protoc. 2016;11(12):2301.

    Not in our library10.1038/nprot.2016.136

53. 53.

    Woo S, Cha SW, Merrihew G, He Y, Castellana N, Guest C, et al. Proteogenomic database construction driven from large scale RNA-seq data. J Proteome Res. 2013;13(1):21-28.

    Not in our library10.1021/pr400294c

54. 54.

    Plerou V, Gopikrishnan P, Rosenow B, Amaral LAN, Guhr T, Stanley HE. Random matrix approach to cross correlations in financial data. Phys Rev E. 2002;65(6):066126.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.65.066126

Cited by papers we hold 25

• Challenging the Astral mass analyzer to quantify up to 5,300 proteins per single cell at unseen accuracy to uncover cellular heterogeneity · 2025
  No notice
• Automated single-cell proteomics providing sufficient proteome depth to study complex biology beyond cell type classifications · 2024
  No notice
• MS-Based Proteomics of Body Fluids: The End of the Beginning · 2023
  No notice
• A deeper look at carrier proteome effects for single-cell proteomics · 2022
  Not checked
• Large-scale deep multi-layer analysis of Alzheimer’s disease brain reveals strong proteomic disease-related changes not observed at the RNA level · 2022
  No notice
• Breaking the Immune Complexity of the Tumor Microenvironment Using Single-Cell Technologies · 2022
  Not checked
• Streamlined single-cell proteomics by an integrated microfluidic chip and data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry · 2022
  No notice
• Exploring functional protein covariation across single cells using nPOP · 2022
  No notice
• cyCombine allows for robust integration of single-cell cytometry datasets within and across technologies · 2022
  No notice
• Ultra‐high sensitivity mass spectrometry quantifies single‐cell proteome changes upon perturbation · 2022
  No notice
• Single-cell proteomic and transcriptomic analysis of macrophage heterogeneity using SCoPE2 · 2021
  No notice
• Assessment of TMT Labeling Efficiency in Large-Scale Quantitative Proteomics: The Critical Effect of Sample pH · 2021
  Not checked
• Application of Proteomics in Cancer: Recent Trends and Approaches for Biomarkers Discovery · 2021
  No notice
• Quantitative single-cell proteomics as a tool to characterize cellular hierarchies · 2021
  No notice
• Surfactant-assisted one-pot sample preparation for label-free single-cell proteomics · 2021
  No notice
• The Human Proteoform Project: Defining the human proteome · 2021
  No notice
• High-throughput and high-efficiency sample preparation for single-cell proteomics using a nested nanowell chip · 2021
  Corrected
• 3D projection electrophoresis for single-cell immunoblotting · 2020
  Not checked
• An Improved Boosting to Amplify Signal with Isobaric Labeling (iBASIL) Strategy for Precise Quantitative Single-cell Proteomics · 2020
  No notice
• Raman-guided subcellular pharmaco-metabolomics for metastatic melanoma cells · 2020
  No notice

and 5 more

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.