Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Nov 4, 2026.

Reconstructing the Backbone of the Saccharomycotina Yeast Phylogeny Using Genome-Scale Data

Xing-Xing Shen, Xiaofan Zhou, Jacek Kominek and 3 more

G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics · 2016

doi:10.1534/g3.116.034744

Abstract

Understanding the phylogenetic relationships among the yeasts of the subphylum Saccharomycotina is a prerequisite for understanding the evolution of their metabolisms and ecological lifestyles. In the last two decades, the use of rDNA and multilocus data sets has greatly advanced our understanding of the yeast phylogeny, but many deep relationships remain unsupported. In contrast, phylogenomic analyses have involved relatively few taxa and lineages that were often selected with limited considerations for covering the breadth of yeast biodiversity. Here we used genome sequence data from 86 publicly available yeast genomes representing nine of the 11 known major lineages and 10 nonyeast fungal outgroups to generate a 1233-gene, 96-taxon data matrix. Species phylogenies reconstructed using two different methods (concatenation and coalescence) and two data matrices (amino acids or the first two codon positions) yielded identical and highly supported relationships between the nine major lineages. Aside from the lineage comprised by the family Pichiaceae, all other lineages were monophyletic. Most interrelationships among yeast species were robust across the two methods and data matrices. However, eight of the 93 internodes conflicted between analyses or data sets, including the placements of: the clade defined by species that have reassigned the CUG codon to encode serine, instead of leucine; the clade defined by a whole genome duplication; and the species Ascoidea rubescens. These phylogenomic analyses provide a robust roadmap for future comparative work across the yeast subphylum in the disciplines of taxonomy, molecular genetics, evolutionary biology, ecology, and biotechnology. To further this end, we have also provided a BLAST server to query the 86 Saccharomycotina genomes, which can be found at http://y1000plus.org/blast.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 90

  1. 1.

    Altschul S. F. Gish W. Miller W. Myers E. W. Lipman D. J., 1990 Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403–410.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80360-2

  2. 2.

    Borneman A. R. Desany B. A. Riches D. Affourtit J. P. Forgan A. H., 2012 The genome sequence of the wine yeast VIN7 reveals an allotriploid hybrid genome with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii origins. FEMS Yeast Res. 12: 88–96.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00773.x

  3. 3.

    Butler G. Rasmussen M. D. Lin M. F. Santos M. A. S. Sakthikumar S., 2009 Evolution of pathogenicity and sexual reproduction in eight Candida genomes. Nature 459: 657–662.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08064

  4. 4.
  5. 5.

    Capella-Gutierrez S. Silla-Martinez J. M. Gabaldon T., 2009 TrimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25: 1972–1973.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348

  6. 6.

    Darriba D. Taboada G. L. Doallo R. Posada D., 2011 ProtTest 3: fast selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 27: 164–165.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btr088

  7. 7.

    Dujon B., 2010 Yeast evolutionary genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11: 512–524.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg2811

  8. 8.
  9. 9.

    Edwards S. V., 2009 Is a new and general theory of molecular systematics emerging? Evolution. 63: 1–19.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00549.x

  10. 10.

    Felsenstein J., 1981 Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17: 368–376.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf01734359

  11. 11.
  12. 12.

    Gibson B. Liti G., 2015 Saccharomyces pastorianus: genomic insights inspiring innovation for industry. Yeast 32: 17–27.

    Not in our library10.1002/yea.3033

  13. 13.

    Goffeau A. Barrell B. G. Bussey H. Davis R. W. Dujon B., 1996 Life with 6000 Genes. Science 274: 546–567.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.274.5287.546

  14. 14.

    Hall C. Dietrich F. S., 2007 The reacquisition of biotin prototrophy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae involved horizontal gene transfer, gene duplication and gene clustering. Genetics 177: 2293–2307.

    Not in our library10.1534/genetics.107.074963

  15. 15.

    Heath T. A. Hedtke S. M. Hillis D. M., 2008 Taxon sampling and the accuracy of phylogenetic analyses. J. Syst. Evol. 46: 239–257.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Hittinger C. T., 2013 Saccharomyces diversity and evolution: a budding model genus. Trends Genet. 29: 309–317.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tig.2013.01.002

  17. 17.

    Hittinger C. T. Rokas A. Carroll S. B., 2004 Parallel inactivation of multiple GAL pathway genes and ecological diversification in yeasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 14144–14149.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0404319101

  18. 18.

    Hittinger C. T. Rokas A. Bai F.-Y. Boekhout T. Gonçalves P., 2015 Genomics and the making of yeast biodiversity. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 35: 100–109.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.gde.2015.10.008

  19. 19.

    Hosner P. A. Faircloth B. C. Glenn T. C. Braun E. L. Kimball R. T., 2016 Avoiding missing data biases in phylogenomic inference: an empirical study in the Landfowl (Aves: Galliformes). Mol. Biol. Evol. 33: 1110–1125.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msv347

  20. 20.

    Hovmöller R. Knowles L. L. Kubatko L. S., 2013 Effects of missing data on species tree estimation under the coalescent. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 69: 1057–1062.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ympev.2013.06.004

  21. 21.

    Huelsenbeck J. P. Bull J. J. Cunningham C. W., 1996 Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 152–158.

    Not in our library10.1016/0169-5347(96)10006-9

  22. 22.

    Huson D. H. Bryant D., 2006 Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23: 254–267.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msj030

  23. 23.

    James T. Y. Kauff F. Schoch C. L. Matheny P. B. Hofstetter V., 2006 Reconstructing the early evolution of fungi using a six-gene phylogeny. Nature 443: 818–822.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature05110

  24. 24.

    Katoh K. Standley D. M., 2013 MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30: 772–780.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/mst010

  25. 25.

    Kobert K. Salichos L. Rokas A. Stamatakis A., 2016 Computing the internode certainty and related measures from partial gene trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33: 1606–1617.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msw040

  26. 26.

    Kurtzman C. P. Robnett C. J., 1994 Orders and families of ascosporogenous yeasts and yeast-like taxa compared from ribosomal RNA sequence similarities, pp. 249–258 in Ascomycete Systematics: Problems and Perspectives in the Nineties, edited by Hawksworth D. L. Plenum Press, New York.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    Kurtzman C. P. Robnett C. J., 1998 Identification and phylogeny of ascomycetous yeasts from analysis of nuclear large subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA partial sequences. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 73: 331–371.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1001761008817

  28. 28.

    Kurtzman C. P. Robnett C. J., 2003 Phylogenetic relationships among yeasts of the “Saccharomyces complex” determined from multigene sequence analyses. FEMS Yeast Res. 3: 417–432.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1567-1356(03)00012-6

  29. 29.

    Kurtzman C. P. Robnett C. J., 2007 Multigene phylogenetic analysis of the Trichomonascus, Wickerhamiella and Zygoascus yeast clades, and the proposal of Sugiyamaella gen. nov. and 14 new species combinations. FEMS Yeast Res. 7: 141–151.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00157.x

  30. 30.

    Kurtzman C. P. Robnett C. J., 2013 Relationships among genera of the Saccharomycotina (Ascomycota) from multigene phylogenetic analysis of type species. FEMS Yeast Res. 13: 23–33.

    Not in our library10.1111/1567-1364.12006

  31. 31.

    Kurtzman C. P. Suzuki M., 2010 Phylogenetic analysis of ascomycete yeasts that form coenzyme Q-9 and the proposal of the new genera Babjeviella, Meyerozyma, Millerozyma, Priceomyces, and Scheffersomyces. Mycoscience 51: 2–14.

    Not in our library

  32. 32.

    Kurtzman C. P. Robnett C. J. Basehoar-Powers E., 2008 Phylogenetic relationships among species of Pichia, Issatchenkia and Williopsis determined from multigene sequence analysis, and the proposal of Barnettozyma gen. nov., Lindnera gen. nov. and Wickerhamomyces gen. nov. FEMS Yeast Res. 8: 939–954.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00419.x

  33. 33.

    Kurtzman C. P. Fell J. W. Boekhout T., 2011 The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study. Elsevier Science, New York.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    Lartillot N. Philippe H., 2004 A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21: 1095–1109.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msh112

  35. 35.

    Lartillot N. Lepage T. Blanquart S., 2009 PhyloBayes 3: a Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating. Bioinformatics 25: 2286–2288.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btp368

  36. 36.

    Le S. Q. Gascuel O., 2008 An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25: 1307–1320.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msn067

  37. 37.

    Liang D. Shen X. X. Zhang P., 2013 One thousand two hundred ninety nuclear genes from a genome-wide survey support lungfishes as the sister group of tetrapods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30: 1803–1807.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/mst072

  38. 38.

    Libkind D. Hittinger C. T. Valério E. Gonçalves C. Dover J., 2011 Microbe domestication and the identification of the wild genetic stock of lager-brewing yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108: 14539–14544.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1105430108

  39. 39.

    Lin Z. Li W. H., 2011 Expansion of hexose transporter genes was associated with the evolution of aerobic fermentation in yeasts. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28: 131–142.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msq184

  40. 40.

    Liti G. Ba A. N. N. Blythe M. Müller C. A. Bergström A., 2013 High quality de novo sequencing and assembly of the Saccharomyces arboricolus genome. BMC Genomics 14: 69.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2164-14-69

  41. 41.

    Liu L. Xi Z. Wu S. Davis C. C. Edwards S. V., 2015 Estimating phylogenetic trees from genome-scale data. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1360: 36–53.

    Not in our library10.1111/nyas.12747

  42. 42.

    Liu Y. Leigh J. W. Brinkmann H. Cushion M. T. Rodriguez-Ezpeleta N., 2009 Phylogenomic analyses support the monophyly of Taphrinomycotina, including Schizosaccharomyces fission yeasts. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26: 27–34.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msn221

  43. 43.

    Louis V. L. Despons L. Friedrich A. Martin T. Durrens P., 2012 Pichia sorbitophila, an interspecies yeast hybrid, reveals early steps of genome resolution after polyploidization. G3 (Bethesda) 2: 299–311.

    Not in our library10.1534/g3.111.000745

  44. 44.

    Maere S. Heymans K. Kuiper M., 2005 BiNGO: a Cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics 21: 3448–3449.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bti551

  45. 45.
  46. 46.

    Medina E. M. Jones G. W. Fitzpatrick D. A., 2011 Reconstructing the fungal tree of life using phylogenomics and a preliminary investigation of the distribution of yeast prion-like proteins in the fungal kingdom. J. Mol. Evol. 73: 116–133.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00239-011-9461-4

  47. 47.

    Mirarab S. Reaz R. Bayzid M. S. Zimmermann T. Swenson M. S., 2014 ASTRAL: genome-scale coalescent-based species tree estimation. Bioinformatics 30: i541–i548.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btu462

  48. 48.

    Mirarab S. Bayzid M. S. Boussau B. Warnow T., 2015 Response to Comment on “Statistical binning enables an accurate coalescent-based estimation of the avian tree.” Science 350: 171.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.aaa7719

  49. 49.

    Morel G. Sterck L. Swennen D. Marcet-Houben M. Onesime D., 2015 Differential gene retention as an evolutionary mechanism to generate biodiversity and adaptation in yeasts. Sci. Rep. 5: 11571.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep11571

  50. 50.

    Mühlhausen S. Kollmar M., 2014 Molecular phylogeny of sequenced Saccharomycetes reveals polyphyly of the alternative yeast codon usage. Genome Biol. Evol. 6: 3222–3237.

    Not in our library10.1093/gbe/evu152

  51. 51.

    Nguyen N. H. Suh S.-O. Marshall C. J. Blackwell M., 2006 Morphological and ecological similarities: wood-boring beetles associated with novel xylose-fermenting yeasts, Spathaspora passalidarum gen. sp. nov. and Candida jeffriesii sp. nov. Mycol. Res. 110: 1232–1241.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mycres.2006.07.002

  52. 52.

    Philippe H. Delsuc F. Brinkmann H. Lartillot N., 2005 Phylogenomics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 541–562.

    Not in our library

  53. 53.

    Polev D. E. Bobrov K. S. Eneyskaya E. V. Kulminskaya A. A., 2014 Draft genome sequence of Geotrichum candidum strain 3C. Genome Announc. 2: e00956–14.

    Not in our library10.1128/genomea.00956-14

  54. 54.

    Polzin K. Rokas A., 2014 Evaluating rare amino acid substitutions (RGC_CAMs) in a yeast model clade. PLoS One 9: e92213.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0092213

  55. 55.
  56. 56.

    Riley R. Haridas S. Wolfe K. H. Lopes M. R. Hittinger C. T., 2016 Comparative genomics of biotechnologically important yeasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113: 9882–9887.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1603941113

  57. 57.
  58. 58.

    Rokas A. Holland P. W. H., 2000 Rare genomic changes as a tool for phylogenetics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 454–459.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01967-4

  59. 59.

    Rokas A. Williams B. L. King N. Carroll S. B., 2003 Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425: 798–804.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature02053

  60. 60.

    Salichos L. Rokas A., 2013 Inferring ancient divergences requires genes with strong phylogenetic signals. Nature 497: 327–331.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature12130

  61. 61.

    Salichos L. Stamatakis A. Rokas A., 2014 Novel information theory-based measures for quantifying incongruence among phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31: 1261–1271.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msu061

  62. 62.

    Scannell D. R. Byrne K. P. Gordon J. L. Wong S. Wolfe K. H., 2006 Multiple rounds of speciation associated with reciprocal gene loss in polyploid yeasts. Nature 440: 341–345.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature04562

  63. 63.
  64. 64.

    Schwarz G., 1978 Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 6: 461–464.

    Not in our library

  65. 65.

    Seo T.-K., 2008 Calculating bootstrap probabilities of phylogeny using multilocus sequence data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25: 960–971.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msn043

  66. 66.

    Shannon P. Markiel A. Ozier O. Baliga N. S. Wang J. T., 2003 Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13: 2498–2504.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.1239303

  67. 67.

    Shen X.-X. Salichos L. Rokas A., 2016 A genome-scale investigation of how sequence, function, and tree-based gene properties influence phylogenetic inference. Genome Biol. Evol. 8: 2565–2580.

    Not in our library10.1093/gbe/evw179

  68. 68.

    Simão F. A. Waterhouse R. M. Ioannidis P. Kriventseva E. V. Zdobnov E. M., 2015 BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31: 3210–3212.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351

  69. 69.

    Slot J. C. Rokas A., 2010 Multiple GAL pathway gene clusters evolved independently and by different mechanisms in fungi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 10136–10141.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0914418107

  70. 70.

    Song S. Liu L. Edwards S. V. Wu S., 2012 Resolving conflict in eutherian mammal phylogeny using phylogenomics and the multispecies coalescent model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 14942–14947.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1211733109

  71. 71.

    Springer M. S. Gatesy J., 2016 The gene tree delusion. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 94: 1–33.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ympev.2015.07.018

  72. 72.

    Stamatakis A., 2014 RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30: 1312–1313.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033

  73. 73.

    Stamatakis A. Hoover P. Rougemont J., 2008 A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst. Biol. 57: 758–771.

    Not in our library10.1080/10635150802429642

  74. 74.

    Stanke M. Waack S., 2003 Gene prediction with a hidden markov model and a new intron submodel. Bioinformatics 19(Suppl 2): ii215–ii225.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1080

  75. 75.

    Sugiyama J. Hosaka K. Suh S.-O., 2006 Early diverging Ascomycota: phylogenetic divergence and related evolutionary enigmas. Mycologia 98: 996–1005.

    Not in our library10.3852/mycologia.98.6.996

  76. 76.

    Tavaré S., 1986 Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences, pp. 57–86 in Lectures on Mathematics in the Life Sciences, edited by Miura R. M. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.

    Not in our library

  77. 77.

    Taylor J. W. Berbee M. L., 2006 Dating divergences in the fungal tree of life: review and new analyses. Mycologia 98: 838–849.

    Not in our library10.3852/mycologia.98.6.838

  78. 78.

    Wang Y. Zhou X. Yang D. Rokas A., 2015 A genome-scale investigation of incongruence in culicidae mosquitoes. Genome Biol. Evol. 7: 3463–3471.

    Not in our library10.1093/gbe/evv235

  79. 79.

    Waterhouse R. M. Tegenfeldt F. Li J. Zdobnov E. M. Kriventseva E. V., 2013 OrthoDB: a hierarchical catalog of animal, fungal and bacterial orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res. 41: D358–D365.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gks1116

  80. 80.
  81. 81.

    Whelan N. Kocot K. M. Moroz L. L. Halanych K. M., 2015 Error, signal, and the placement of Ctenophora sister to all other animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112: 5773–5778.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1503453112

  82. 82.

    Wickett N. J. Mirarab S. Nguyen N. Warnow T. Carpenter E., 2014 Phylotranscriptomic analysis of the origin and early diversification of land plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111: E4859–E4868.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1323926111

  83. 83.

    Wolfe K. H. Shields D. C., 1997 Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387: 708–713.

    Not in our library10.1038/42711

  84. 84.

    Wolfe K. H. Armisén D. Proux-Wera E. ÓhÉigeartaigh S. S. Azam H., 2015 Clade- and species-specific features of genome evolution in the Saccharomycetaceae. FEMS Yeast Res. 15: fov035.

    Not in our library10.1093/femsyr/fov035

  85. 85.

    Xi Z. Liu L. Rest J. S. Davis C. C., 2014 Coalescent vs. concatenation methods and the placement of Amborella as sister to water lilies. Syst. Biol. 63: 919–932.

    Not in our library10.1093/sysbio/syu055

  86. 86.

    Xi Z. Liu L. Davis C. C., 2016 The impact of missing data on species tree estimation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33: 838–860.

    Not in our library10.1093/molbev/msv266

  87. 87.

    Yandell M. Ence D., 2012 A beginner’s guide to eukaryotic genome annotation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13: 329–342.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg3174

  88. 88.

    Yang Z., 1994 Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39: 306–314.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf00160154

  89. 89.

    Yang Z., 1996 Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analyses. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 367–372.

    Not in our library10.1016/0169-5347(96)10041-0

  90. 90.

    Zwickl D. J. Hillis D. M., 2002 Increased taxon sampling greatly reduces phylogenetic error. Syst. Biol. 51: 588–598.

    Not in our library10.1080/10635150290102339

Cited by papers we hold 7

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.