Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 19, 2026.

Distinct combinations of variant ionotropic glutamate receptors mediate thermosensation and hygrosensation in Drosophila

Zachary A Knecht, Ana F Silbering, Lina Ni and 8 more

eLife · 2016 · CC BY

doi:10.1101/056267

Abstract

Ionotropic Receptors (IRs) are a large subfamily of variant ionotropic glutamate receptors present across Protostomia. While these receptors are most extensively studied for their roles in chemosensory detection, recent work has implicated two family members, IR21a and IR25a, in thermosensation in Drosophila. Here we characterize one of the most evolutionarily deeply conserved receptors, IR93a, and show that it is co-expressed and functions with IR21a and IR25a to mediate physiological and behavioral responses to cool temperatures. IR93a is also co-expressed with IR25a and a distinct receptor, IR40a, in a discrete population of sensory neurons in the sacculus, a multi-chambered pocket within the antenna. We demonstrate that this combination of receptors is required for neuronal responses to dry air and behavioral discrimination of humidity differences. Our results identify IR93a as a common component of molecularly and cellularly distinct IR pathways important for thermosensation and hygrosensation in insects.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 20, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Ionotropic Receptors (IRs) are a large subfamily of ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) that appear to have evolved in the last common protostome ancestor. In contrast to the critical role of iGluRs in synaptic communication, IRs have diverse roles in chemosensory detection. The best-defined functions of IRs are in olfaction, where they mediate sensory neuron responses to diverse chemicals, including many acids and amines. Most IRs are thought to form heteromeric ligand-gated ion channels, in which broadly expressed co-receptor subunits (e.g., IR8a, IR25a and IR76b) combine with more selectively expressed IR subunits that confer stimulus specificity. Many of these IRs are highly conserved in insects, indicating that they define sensory pathways common to a wide range of species.

Although most conserved IRs have been assigned chemosensory roles, we recently reported that one of these receptors, IR21a, mediates cool sensing (together with IR25a) in a population of neurons in the Drosophila melanogaster larva, the dorsal organ cool cells (DOCCs). This finding raised the possibility that other IRs serve non-chemosensory functions. In this work we characterize one of these 'orphan' receptors, IR93a, which has orthologs across arthropods. RNA expression analysis in several insects and crustaceans indicates that this receptor gene is transcribed in peripheral sensory organs, but its role(s) are unknown. Using Drosophila as a model, we find that IR93a acts with different combinations of IRs in distinct populations of neurons to mediate physiological and behavioral responses to both thermosensory and hygrosensory cues.

IR93a is expressed in larval thermosensory neurons and is essential for cool avoidance

To investigate the expression and function of IR93a, we generated antibodies against a C-terminal peptide sequence of this receptor and obtained two Ir93a mutant alleles: Ir93aMI05555, which contains a transposon insertion in the fifth coding exon, and Ir93a122, which we generated using CRISPR/Cas9 to delete 22 bases within the sequence encoding the first transmembrane domain (Figure 1a).

In larvae, IR93a protein is expressed in several neurons in the dorsal organ ganglion, one of the main sensory organs in the larval head (Figure 1b–c). These neurons encompass the DOCCs (labeled by an Ir21a promoter-Gal4-driven GFP reporter), and the protein localizes prominently to the dendritic bulb at the tip of the sensory processes of these cells (Figure 1c). All expression was absent in Ir93a mutants, confirming antiserum specificity (Figure 1c).

These observations indicated that IR93a might function in cool sensing. Indeed, when larval thermotaxis was assessed on a thermal gradient, we found both Ir93a mutant alleles exhibited strong defects in cool avoidance (Figure 1d). Cell-specific expression of an Ir93a cDNA in the DOCCs under Ir21a-Gal4 control fully rescued this mutant phenotype (Figure 1d). These data demonstrate an essential role for IR93a in DOCCs in larval thermotaxis.

IR93a is required, together with IR21a and IR25a, for cool-dependent physiological responses of DOCCs

We next assessed whether IR93a is required for the physiological responses of DOCCs to cooling by optical imaging of these neurons using the genetically encoded calcium indicator, GCaMP6m. As previously reported, wild-type DOCCs exhibit robust increases in intracellular calcium in response to cooling (Figure 2a). These responses were dramatically reduced in Ir93a mutants, and could be rescued by cell-specific expression of an Ir93a cDNA (using the R11F02-Gal4 DOCC driver) (Figure 2a,b). This dramatic loss of DOCC temperature sensitivity resembles that observed in both Ir21a and Ir25a mutants, and is consistent with IR21a, IR25a and IR93a functioning together to mediate cool activation of the DOCCs.

To provide a more direct readout of thermotransduction in these neurons than soma calcium measurements, we tested the requirement for IR93a, IR21a and IR25a in cool-evoked membrane voltage changes using the genetically encoded voltage sensor, Arclight. In wild-type animals, cool-dependent voltage changes were observed in the DOCC sensory dendritic bulbs (Figure 2c–d), where IRs are localized (Figure 1c). This response was completely eliminated in Ir21a, Ir25a and Ir93a mutants (Figure 2c–e), indicating that each of these IRs is required for temperature-dependent voltage changes in this sensory compartment.

IR93a is co-expressed with IR25a and IR40a in the antennal sacculus

In adults, Ir93a transcripts were previously weakly detected in a set of neurons in the third antennal segment surrounding the sacculus, a three-chambered pouch whose opening lies on the posterior surface of the antenna (Figure 3a). With our IR93a antibody, we detected IR93a expression in neurons innervating sacculus chamber I (11.0 ± 0.5 neurons, n = 48 animals; mean ± SEM) and chamber II (13.9 ± 0.7 neurons, n = 23), with signal detected both in the soma and in the sensory cilia that project into cuticular sensory hairs (sensilla) (Figure 3b). As in larval DOCCs, IR25a was expressed in IR93a-expressing cells in the sacculus (Figure 3c). By contrast, no expression was detected in these cells when using our Ir21a promoter driver (data not shown). We found instead that the IR93a/IR25a sacculus neurons express a distinct receptor, IR40a (Figure 3d–e).

IR93a, IR25a and IR40a are necessary for hygrosensory behavior

Morphological studies have suggested that neurons in sacculus chambers I and II are hygroreceptive, raising the possibility that IR93a, IR25a, and IR40a are required for hygrosensory behavior. To test this hypothesis, we adapted an experimental paradigm in which flies choose between regions of differing humidity generated by two underlying chambers: one containing deionized water and the other containing water saturated with a non-volatile solute (ammonium nitrate) to lower its vapor pressure (Figure 4a). This assay design created a humidity gradient of ~96% relative humidity (RH) to ~67% RH, with negligible variation in temperature (Figure 4b). Consistent with previous observations, wild-type flies exhibited a strong preference for lower humidity (Figure 4c). This preference was completely eliminated in Ir93a and Ir25a mutant flies, and significantly reduced, but not abolished, in Ir40a mutants (Figure 4c, Figure 4—figure supplement 1a). All of these behavioral defects were robustly rescued by the corresponding cDNAs, confirming the specificity of the mutant defects (Figure 4c). Importantly, the loss of Ir21a (or other antennal-expressed IR co-receptors, Ir8a and Ir76b) did not disrupt dry preference. To exclude any potential contribution of the non-volatile solute to the behavior observed, we also tested flies in a humidity gradient (~89% to ~96% RH) generated using underlying chambers of deionized water alone and air (Figure 4a). Even in this very shallow gradient, wild type flies displayed a strong preference for the side with lower humidity (Figure 4d), and this preference was dependent on IR93a, IR25a and IR40a, but independent of IR21a (Figure 4d). The distinction between the functions of IR21a and IR40a extended to thermotaxis, as Ir40a mutants exhibited no defects in this IR21a-dependent behavior (Figure 4—figure supplement 1a–b), consistent with lack of expression of IR40a in the larval DOCCs (data not shown).

IRs mediate dry detection by sacculus neurons

To test whether the IR40a/IR93a/IR25a-expressing sacculus neurons are physiological hygrosensors, we monitored their calcium responses to changes in the RH of an airstream (of constant temperature) directed towards the antenna. We used Ir40a-Gal4 to express UAS-GCaMP6m selectively in these neurons, and measured GCaMP6m fluorescence in their axon termini, which innervate two regions of the antennal lobe, the 'arm' and the 'column' (Figure 5a–b).

We observed that these sacculus neurons behave as dry-activated hygrosensors: decreasing the RH from ~90% to ~7% RH elicited an increase in GCaMP6m fluorescence, while increasing RH from ~7% to ~90% elicited a decrease (Figure 5c–g). Calcium changes were most apparent in the 'arm' (Figure 5c). Importantly, these physiological responses were IR-dependent: mutations in either Ir93a or Ir40a eliminated the dry response (Ir25a mutants were not tested), and these defects were restored with corresponding cDNA rescue transgenes (Figure 5d–g). These data corroborate the requirement for IRs in behavioral preference for lower humidity.

The TRP channels Nanchung and Water witch do not mediate IR-dependent dry sensation

Previous work has implicated two Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) channels, Nanchung and Water witch, in hygrosensation, but it is unclear whether they have an essential function in this modality and the cells in which these proteins act are unknown. In our gradient assay, we found that animals mutant for nanchung or water witch displayed partially diminished dry preference behavior (Figure 6a). However, neither nan nor wtrw was required for the dry responsiveness of IR40a-expressing sacculus neurons (Figure 6b–e). Thus, these TRP channels are not essential for IR-dependent dry sensing, suggesting that they contribute to hygrotaxis through other mechanisms.

Discussion

From their ancestral origins within the synaptic iGluR family, IRs are widely appreciated to have evolved functionally diverse roles in environmental chemosensory detection. Here we provide evidence that a previously uncharacterized member of this repertoire, IR93a, functions in two critical non-chemosensory modalities, thermosensation and hygrosensation. In both of these roles, IR93a acts with the broadly expressed co-receptor IR25a. However, these IRs mediate these two modalities in different populations of neurons in conjunction with a third, distinct IR: with IR21a in cool sensation, but not dry sensation, and with IR40a in dry sensation, but not cool sensation. All of these receptors are widely conserved in insects, indicating that these sensory pathways likely underlie behavioral responses of diverse species to these important environmental stimuli.

The identification of an IR21a/IR25a/IR93a-dependent cool-sensing system provides a molecular counterpart to the well-established TRP channel and 'Gustatory' Receptor GR28B(D) warmth-sensing systems. By contrast, despite the importance of hygrosensation in helping insects to avoid desiccation or inundation and – in blood-feeding species such as mosquitoes – to locate mammalian hosts, the neuronal and molecular basis of this sensory modality is poorly understood. Hygrosensitive neurons have been identified electrophysiologically in large insects, but their behavioral role has been hard to determine. In Drosophila, the antenna has long been suspected to be an important hygrosensory organ, but there has been little consensus on the relevant populations of neurons and sensory receptors. We have identified a discrete population of dry-activated hygroreceptors in the sacculus that express IR40a/IR93a/IR25a. Together with an independent study, our data provide physiological and behavioral evidence supporting these as one pathway that enables flies to distinguish external humidity levels.

In addition to the roles of IR93a in cool and dry sensing, it is very likely that this receptor defines additional sensory pathways. Our expression analysis has identified IR93a-positive cells that do not express IR21a or IR40a, such as non-DOCCs in the larval dorsal organ (Figure 1c). Moreover, the milder hygrosensory behavior phenotype of our protein null Ir40a mutants compared to Ir93a (or Ir25a) mutants hints that IR93a may have broader roles in this sensory modality than acting exclusively with IR40a. The populations of IR93a-expressing neurons characterized in this study are themselves heterogeneous. For example, IR40a/IR93a/IR25a-expressing sacculus neurons belong to two morphologically and physiologically distinct subpopulations. Arm neurons have contralateral projections and respond robustly to low humidity, while column neurons are exclusively ipsilateral and respond more weakly to humidity, as well as displaying mild thermosensitivity. IR40a-expressing neurons also respond to ammonia. Given that these neurons are housed in apparently poreless sensilla, we speculate that this chemical activates these cells indirectly, for example, through modification of the humidity of the air, or the temperature of the cuticular surface, within the sacculus.

A key future challenge will be to determine the mechanisms by which IRs contribute to the sensation of thermal and humidity cues. We previously showed that ectopically-expressed IR21a can confer cool sensitivity to other IR-expressing neurons, consistent with IR21a acting as a sensory specificity determinant. It will be important to determine if IR40a serves a more permissive role or functions in a similar capacity in dry sensing. The contribution (if any) of the Venus flytrap-like ligand-binding domains of these receptors is of particular interest. Although this domain recognizes glutamate in iGluRs, and diverse organic molecules in chemosensory IRs, it is conceivable that these domains mediate thermo- and hygrosensory detection in these receptors in a ligand-independent manner. For example, IR21a could transduce information via temperature-dependent conformational changes. The requirement for IR93a (and IR25a) in both thermosensation and hygrosensation also indicates that these modalities could share common mechanisms of sensory detection. For example, hygrosensation could involve a thermosensory component, based on evaporative cooling. Alternatively, both temperature and moisture detection could involve mechanosensation, based on swelling or shrinkage of sensory structures, as suggested in mammals and C. elegans. Further characterization of how IRs mediate temperature and moisture detection is currently limited by our inability to reconstitute thermosensory or hygrosensory responses in heterologous systems by expressing the known combinations of IRs (G.B., L.N., A.F.S., R.B. and P.G., unpublished data). IRs, like iGluRs, are thought to form heterotetrameric complexes, raising the possibility that additional IR subunits are required. It is also conceivable that other types of accessory signaling molecules act with IRs, and/or that the cellular and cuticular specializations of the thermosensory and hygrosensory structures are critical to allow monitoring of these ubiquitous and ever-changing environmental stimuli.

Fly strains

Ir25a2, UAS-Ir25a, Ir8a1, Ir21a123, Ir76b2, R11F02-Gal4, Ir40a-Gal4, Ir40a1, UAS-Ir40a, Ir93aMI05555, UAS-GCaMP6m (P[20XUAS-IVS-GCaMP6m]attp2 and P[20XUAS-IVS-GCaMP6m]attp2attP40), UAS-Arclight UAS-GFP (P[10XUAS-IVS-Syn21-GFP-p10]attP2), nan36a, wtrw2 and y1 P(act5c-cas9, w) M(3xP3-RFP.attP)ZH-2A w* were previously described.

Ir40a134 (Figure 4—figure supplement 1a) and Ir93a122 (Figure 1a) were generated by transgene-based CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering, using either an Ir40a-targeting gRNA (5’-GCCCGTTTAAGCAAGACATC) or an Ir93a-targeting gRNA (5’-TCAGCAGAATGATGCCCATT) expressed under U6-3 promoter control (dU6-3:gRNA) in the presence of act-cas9. UAS-mCherry:Ir93a contains codons 29–869 of the Ir93a ORF (corresponding to Ir93a-PD [flybase.org], without the sequence encoding the predicted endogenous signal peptide), which were PCR amplified from Oregon R antennal cDNA and subcloned into pUAST-mCherry attB (which encodes the calreticulin signal sequence upstream of the mCherry ORF). This construct was integrated into VK00027 by phiC31-mediated transgenesis (Genetic Services, Inc.).

Behavior

Thermotaxis of early second instar larvae was assessed over a 15 min period on a temperature gradient extending from 13.5 to 21.5°C over 22 cm (~0.36°C/cm) as described. As thermotaxis data were normally distributed (as assessed by Shapiro-Wilk test), statistical comparisons were performed by Tukey HSD test, which corrects for multiple comparisons.

To assay hygrosensory behavior, 8 well rectangular dishes (12.8 × 8.55 × 1.5 cm; ThermoFisher #267060) were modified to serve as humidity preference chambers. The lids of two 8 well plates were used. A heated razor blade was used to cut out the middle of one lid, and a nylon mesh was glued into place around the edges, providing a surface for the animals to walk on which separated them from contact with any liquid. A soldering iron was used to melt a small hole in a second culture plate lid, which could then be placed over the screen, creating a chamber ~0.7 cm in height in which the flies could move freely. To monitor the gradients formed, an additional chamber was constructed with four holes equally spaced along its length to allow the insertion of humidity sensors (Sensirion EK-H4 evaluation kit) for monitoring the humidity and temperature.

Prior to the start of each experiment, 4 wells on one side of the culture dish were filled with purified water, while the opposite 4 were filled with ~4 ml water and sufficient ammonium nitrate to obtain a saturated solution (~3 g). The gradient was assembled with the screen and lid piece, and the whole apparatus wrapped in food service film to avoid any transfer of air between the inside and outside of the device. Gradients were transferred to an environmental room that maintained at constant external temperature and humidity (25°C and 70%RH). Ammonium nitrate gradients were permitted to equilibrate for approximately 1 hr and were stable over many hours. For the water and air only gradients, the air only side humidified over time. These gradients were incubated for 25 min prior to use to allow the temperature to equilibrate; the humidity of the dry side typically rose by ~2% RH during the 30 min assay (values shown are at the 30 min time point). A small hole was poked through the food service film covering the device to allow animals to be transferred to the gradient. This hole was sealed using transparent scotch tape once the animals were inside. Experiments used 1–4 day old adult flies that had been sorted under light CO2 anesthesia into groups of 30 (15 male and 15 female) animals 24 hr before testing, and transferred to fresh tubes. Flies were allowed 30 min to settle on the gradient, at which point a photograph was taken of their position, and the number of animals on each side counted, allowing calculation of a dry preference index as follows:

As moisture preference data did not conform to normal distributions (as assessed by Shapiro-Wilk test, p<0.01), statistical comparisons to wild-type control were performed by Steel test, a non-parametric test that corrects for multiple comparisons, using JMP11 (SAS).

Calcium and Arclight imaging

Calcium and Arclight imaging of larval thermosensors was performed as previously described. Pseudocolor images were created using the 16-colors lookup table in ImageJ 1.43r. Adult antennal lobe calcium imaging was performed as described for olfactory imaging, with slight modifications to sample preparation and stimulation. Briefly, 3–7 day old flies were fixed to a Plexiglas stage using UV-glue (A1 Tetric Evoflow, Ivoclar Vivadent), the antennae were pulled forward and a small opening was made in the head capsule to allow visual access to the antennal lobes. For the stimulation compressed air from a tank was passed through activated charcoal and then either through an empty gas washing bottle or a gas washing bottle filled with distilled water producing either a dry airstream of ~7% RH or a humid airstream of ~90% RH. A computer controlled solenoid valve (The Lee Company, Westbrook, CT) was used to switch the airflow between the two gas washing bottles. The flow was kept constant at 1 l/min with a parallel arrangement of two 500 ml/min mass flow controllers (PKM SA, www.pkmsa.ch) placed before the gas washing bottles. Activating the solenoid valve resulted in a complete reversal of RH from low to high or high to low within less than 10 s. For each animal tested, both high to low and low to high RH transitions were applied in random order. Following humidity stimulation, a final pulse of 10% ammonia was applied as a control to confirm cellular activity (animals showing no response to this positive control were excluded from the analysis). Data were processed using Stackreg (ImageJ) to correct for movement artifacts (animals with movement artifacts that could not be corrected with Stackreg were excluded from the analysis) and custom scripts in Matlab and R as previously described. As quantified imaging data did not conform to normal distributions (as assessed by Shapiro-Wilk test, p<0.01), statistical comparisons were performed by Steel-Dwass test, a non-parametric test that corrects for multiple comparisons, using JMP11 (SAS).

Immunohistochemistry

Larval immunostaining was performed as described. Immunofluorescence on antennal cryosections or whole-mount antennae was performed essentially as described, except that whole-mount antennae were placed in Vectashield immediately after the final washes without dehydration. The following antibodies were used: rabbit anti-IR25a (1:1000;), guinea pig anti-IR40a (1:200,), rabbit anti-IR93a (peptide immunogen CGEFWYRRFRASRKRRQFTN, Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA, 1:4000 for tissue sections and 1:500 for whole-mount tissue), guinea pig anti-IR25a (peptide immunogen SKAALRPRFNQYPATFKPRF, Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA, 1:200), mouse anti-GFP (1:200; Roche), goat anti-rabbit Cy3 (1:100 larva, 1:1000 sections; Jackson ImmunoResearch), goat anti-rabbit Alexa488 (1:100 antenna whole-mount, 1:1000 antennal sections, A11034 Invitrogen AG), goat anti-guinea pig (1:1000, A11073 Invitrogen AG) and donkey anti-mouse FITC (1:100; Jackson ImmunoResearch).

RT-PCR

cDNA for each genotype was purified from 20 fly heads (RETROscript, Ambion) for RT-PCR. Primers used: Ir25a forward, 5’-TAGCAGTCAGCGGGACAATG; Ir25a reverse, 5’ -GAGTGGATTGCGTGACGAGA; Ir40a forward, 5’-GGCGAGGACAAGGCAGTA; Ir40a reverse, 5’-CGGCAGCGGTCATCTTATCT; Ir93a forward, 5’-TGCCAAGGTCCAGCAGATTC; Ir93a reverse, 5’-AACATGTTCAGGGTCTCGGC. RpL32 forward, 5’-GCTAAGCTGTCGCACAAATG; RpL32 reverse 5’-GTTCGATCCGTAACCCGATGT.

References 44

  1. 1.

    Abuin L, Bargeton B, Ulbrich MH, Isacoff EY, Kellenberger S, Benton R. Functional architecture of olfactory ionotropic glutamate receptors. Neuron. 2011;69:44-60.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.042

  2. 2.

    Barbagallo B, Garrity PA. Temperature sensation in Drosophila. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2015;34:8-13.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.conb.2015.01.002

  3. 3.

    Benton R, Vannice KS, Gomez-Diaz C, Vosshall LB. Variant ionotropic glutamate receptors as chemosensory receptors in Drosophila. Cell. 2009;136:149-162.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.001

  4. 4.

    Brown AWA. The Attraction of Mosquitoes to Hosts. JAMA. 1966;196:249-162.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.1966.03100160099028

  5. 5.

    Cao G, Platisa J, Pieribone VA, Raccuglia D, Kunst M, Nitabach MN. Genetically targeted optical electrophysiology in intact neural circuits. Cell. 2013;154:904-913.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.027

  6. 6.

    Chen TW, Wardill TJ, Sun Y, Pulver SR, Renninger SL, Baohan A, Schreiter ER, Kerr RA, Orger MB, Jayaraman V, Looger LL, Svoboda K, Kim DS. Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature. 2013;499:295-300.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature12354

  7. 7.

    Chown SL, Sørensen JG, Terblanche JS. Water loss in insects: an environmental change perspective. Journal of Insect Physiology. 2011;57:1070-1084.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.05.004

  8. 8.

    Corey EA, Bobkov Y, Ukhanov K, Ache BW. Ionotropic crustacean olfactory receptors. PLoS One. 2013;8:e17879.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0060551

  9. 9.
  10. 10.

    Enjin A, Zaharieva EE, Frank DD, Mansourian S, Suh GS, Gallio M, Stensmyr MC. Humidity Sensing in Drosophila. Current Biology. 2016;26:1352-1358.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.049

  11. 11.

    Filingeri D. Humidity sensation, cockroaches, worms, and humans: are common sensory mechanisms for hygrosensation shared across species? Journal of Neurophysiology. 2015;114:763-767.

    Not in our library10.1152/jn.00730.2014

  12. 12.

    Gong Z, Son W, Chung YD, Kim J, Shin DW, McClung CA, Lee Y, Lee HW, Chang DJ, Kaang BK, Cho H, Oh U, Hirsh J, Kernan MJ, Kim C. Two interdependent TRPV channel subunits, inactive and Nanchung, mediate hearing in Drosophila. Journal of Neuroscience. 2004;24:9059-9066.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.1645-04.2004

  13. 13.

    Groh-Lunow KC, Getahun MN, Grosse-Wilde E, Hansson BS. Expression of ionotropic receptors in terrestrial hermit crab's olfactory sensory neurons. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 2014;8:e17879.

    Not in our library10.3389/fncel.2014.00448

  14. 14.
  15. 15.

    Jin L, Han Z, Platisa J, Wooltorton JR, Cohen LB, Pieribone VA. Single action potentials and subthreshold electrical events imaged in neurons with a fluorescent protein voltage probe. Neuron. 2012;75:779-785.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.040

  16. 16.

    Jourjine N, Mullaney BC, Mann K, Scott K. Coupled Sensing of Hunger and Thirst Signals Balances Sugar and Water Consumption. Cell. 2016;166:855-866.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.046

  17. 17.

    Kang K, Panzano VC, Chang EC, Ni L, Dainis AM, Jenkins AM, Regna K, Muskavitch MAT, Garrity PA. Modulation of TRPA1 thermal sensitivity enables sensory discrimination in Drosophila. Nature. 2012;481:76-80.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature10715

  18. 18.

    Klein M, Afonso B, Vonner AJ, Hernandez-Nunez L, Berck M, Tabone CJ, Kane EA, Pieribone VA, Nitabach MN, Cardona A, Zlatic M, Sprecher SG, Gershow M, Garrity PA, Samuel ADT. Sensory determinants of behavioral dynamics in Drosophila thermotaxis. PNAS. 2015;112:E220-E229.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1416212112

  19. 19.

    Koh TW, He Z, Gorur-Shandilya S, Menuz K, Larter NK, Stewart S, Carlson JR. The Drosophila IR20a clade of ionotropic receptors are candidate taste and pheromone receptors. Neuron. 2014;83:850-865.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuron.2014.07.012

  20. 20.

    Kwon Y, Shen WL, Shim HS, Montell C. Fine thermotactic discrimination between the optimal and slightly cooler temperatures via a TRPV channel in chordotonal neurons. Journal of Neuroscience. 2010;30:10465-10471.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.1631-10.2010

  21. 21.

    Liu L, Li Y, Wang R, Yin C, Dong Q, Hing H, Kim C, Welsh MJ. Drosophila hygrosensation requires the TRP channels water witch and nanchung. Nature. 2007;450:294-298.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature06223

  22. 22.

    Mao CX, Xiong Y, Xiong Z, Wang Q, Zhang YQ, Jin S. Microtubule-severing protein Katanin regulates neuromuscular junction development and dendritic elaboration in Drosophila. Development. 2014;141:1064-1074.

    Not in our library10.1242/dev.097774

  23. 23.

    Ni L, Bronk P, Chang EC, Lowell AM, Flam JO, Panzano VC, Theobald DL, Griffith LC, Garrity PA. A gustatory receptor paralogue controls rapid warmth avoidance in Drosophila. Nature. 2013;500:580-584.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature12390

  24. 24.
  25. 25.

    Olanga EA, Okal MN, Mbadi PA, Kokwaro ED, Mukabana WR. Attraction of Anopheles gambiae to odour baits augmented with heat and moisture. Malaria Journal. 2010;9:e17879.

    Not in our library10.1186/1475-2875-9-6

  26. 26.

    Perttunen V, Salmi H. The responses of Drosophila melanogaster Dipt Drosophilidae to the Relative Humidity of the Air. Suomen Hyonteistieteellinen Aikakauskirja. Annales Entomologici Fennici. 1956;22:36-45.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    Perttunen V, Syrjamaki J. The effect of antennaectomy on the humidity reactions of Drosophila melanogaster. Suomen Hyonteistieteellinen Aikakauskirja: Annales Entomologici Fennici. 1958;24:78-83.

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    Pfeiffer BD, Truman JW, Rubin GM. Using translational enhancers to increase transgene expression in Drosophila. PNAS. 2012;109:6626-6631.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1204520109

  29. 29.

    Port F, Chen H-M, Lee T, Bullock SL. Optimized CRISPR/Cas tools for efficient germline and somatic genome engineering in Drosophila. PNAS. 2014;111:E2967-E2976.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1405500111

  30. 30.

    Russell J, Vidal-Gadea AG, Makay A, Lanam C, Pierce-Shimomura JT. Humidity sensation requires both mechanosensory and thermosensory pathways in Caenorhabditis elegans. PNAS. 2014;111:8269-8274.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1322512111

  31. 31.

    Rytz R, Croset V, Benton R. Ionotropic receptors (IRs): chemosensory ionotropic glutamate receptors in Drosophila and beyond. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2013;43:888-897.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ibmb.2013.02.007

  32. 32.

    Saina M, Benton R. Visualizing olfactory receptor expression and localization in Drosophila. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2013;1003:211-228.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-1-62703-377-0_16

  33. 33.

    Sayeed O, Benzer S. Behavioral genetics of thermosensation and hygrosensation in Drosophila. PNAS. 1996;93:6079-6084.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.93.12.6079

  34. 34.

    Shanbhag SR, Singh K, Singh RN. Fine structure and primary sensory projections of sensilla located in the sacculus of the antenna of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell & Tissue Research. 1995;282:237-249.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf00319115

  35. 35.

    Silbering AF, Bell R, Galizia CG, Benton R. Calcium imaging of odor-evoked responses in the Drosophila antennal lobe. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2012;61:e17879.

    Not in our library10.3791/2976

  36. 36.

    Silbering AF, Bell R, Münch D, Cruchet S, Gomez-Diaz C, Laudes T, Galizia CG, Benton R. Ir40a neurons are not DEET detectors. Nature. 2016;534:E5-E7.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature18321

  37. 37.

    Silbering AF, Rytz R, Grosjean Y, Abuin L, Ramdya P, Jefferis GS, Benton R. Complementary function and integrated wiring of the evolutionarily distinct Drosophila olfactory subsystems. Journal of Neuroscience. 2011;31:13357-13375.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.2360-11.2011

  38. 38.

    Stocker RF. The organization of the chemosensory system in Drosophila melanogaster: a review. Cell and Tissue Research. 1994;275:3-26.

    Not in our library10.1007/bf00305372

  39. 39.

    Thévenaz P, Ruttimann UE, Unser M. A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 1998;7:27-41.

    Not in our library10.1109/83.650848

  40. 40.

    Tichy H, Gingl E, Barth F. G, Schimd A. Problems in hygro- and thermoreception. The Ecology of Sensing. 2001;271-287.

    Not in our library

  41. 41.

    Tichy H, Kallina W. Insect hygroreceptor responses to continuous changes in humidity and air pressure. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2010;103:3274-3286.

    Not in our library10.1152/jn.01043.2009

  42. 42.

    Venken KJ, Schulze KL, Haelterman NA, Pan H, He Y, Evans-Holm M, Carlson JW, Levis RW, Spradling AC, Hoskins RA, Bellen HJ. MiMIC: a highly versatile transposon insertion resource for engineering Drosophila melanogaster genes. Nature Methods. 2011;8:737-743.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.1662

  43. 43.

    Yao CA, Ignell R, Carlson JR. Chemosensory coding by neurons in the coeloconic sensilla of the Drosophila antenna. Journal of Neuroscience. 2005;25:8359-8367.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.2432-05.2005

  44. 44.

    Zhang YV, Ni J, Montell C. The molecular basis for attractive salt-taste coding in Drosophila. Science. 2013;340:1334-1338.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1234133

Cited by papers we hold 9

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.