Bracken: estimating species abundance in metagenomics data

Abstract

Metagenomic experiments attempt to characterize microbial communities using high-throughput DNA sequencing. Identification of the microorganisms in a sample provides information about the genetic profile, population structure, and role of microorganisms within an environment. Until recently, most metagenomics studies focused on high-level characterization at the level of phyla, or alternatively sequenced the 16S ribosomal RNA gene that is present in bacterial species. As the cost of sequencing has fallen, though, metagenomics experiments have increasingly used unbiased shotgun sequencing to capture all the organisms in a sample. This approach requires a method for estimating abundance directly from the raw read data. Here we describe a fast, accurate new method that computes the abundance at the species level using the reads collected in a metagenomics experiment. Bracken (Bayesian Reestimation of Abundance after Classification with KrakEN) uses the taxonomic assignments made by Kraken, a very fast read-level classifier, along with information about the genomes themselves to estimate abundance at the species level, the genus level, or above. We demonstrate that Bracken can produce accurate species- and genus-level abundance estimates even when a sample contains multiple near-identical species.

References 26

1. 1.
   The GAAS Metagenomic Tool and Its Estimations of Viral and Microbial Average Genome Size in Four Major Biomes · 2009

   No notice
2. 2.

   Benson DA, Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW. 2015. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Research 43:D30–D35 DOI.

   Not in our library10.1093/nar/gku1216

3. 3.

   Bowers RM, Clum A, Tice H, Lim J, Singh K, Ciobanu D, Ngan CY, Cheng JF, Tringe SG, Woyke T. 2015. Impact of library preparation protocols and template quantity on the metagenomic reconstruction of a mock microbial community. BMC Genomics 16:856 DOI.

   Not in our library10.1186/s12864-015-2063-6

4. 4.

   Brosch R, Gordon SV, Marmiesse M, Brodin P, Buchrieser C, Eiglmeier K, Garnier T, Gutierrez C, Hewinson G, Kremer K, Parsons LM, Pym AS, Samper S, Van Soolingen D, Cole ST. 2002. A new evolutionary scenario for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99:3684–3689 DOI.

   Not in our library10.1073/pnas.052548299

5. 5.

   Garnier T, Eiglmeier K, Camus JC, Medina N, Mansoor H, Pryor M, Duthoy S, Grondin S, Lacroix C, Monsempe C, Simon S, Harris B, Atkin R, Doggett J, Mayes R, Keating L, Wheeler PR, Parkhill J, Barrell BG, Cole ST, Gordon SV, Hewinson RG. 2003. The complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium bovis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100:7877–7882 DOI.

   Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1130426100

6. 6.

   Grange JM. 2001. Mycobacterium bovis infection in human beings. Tuberculosis 81:71–77 DOI.

   Not in our library10.1054/tube.2000.0263

7. 7.

   Helgason E, Okstad OA, Caugant DA, Johansen HA, Fouet A, Mock M, Hegna I, Kolsto AB. 2000. Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, and Bacillus thuringiensis–one species on the basis of genetic evidence. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66:2627–2630 DOI.

   Not in our library10.1128/aem.66.6.2627-2630.2000

8. 8.

   Human Microbiome Project C. 2012. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486:207–214 DOI.

   Not in our library10.1038/nature11234

9. 9.

   Lan R, Reeves PR. 2002. Escherichia coli in disguise: molecular origins of Shigella. Microbes and Infection 4:1125–1132 DOI.

   Not in our library10.1016/s1286-4579(02)01637-4

10. 10.
    An evaluation of the accuracy and speed of metagenome analysis tools · 2016

    Corrected
11. 11.

    Lindner MS, Renard BY. 2012. Metagenomic abundance estimation and diagnostic testing on species level. Nucleic Acids Research 41:e10 DOI.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gks803

12. 12.
    Genomic insights into the taxonomic status of the Bacillus cereus group · 2015

    No notice
13. 13.

    Luo C, Knight R, Siljander H, Knip M, Xavier RJ, Gevers D. 2015. ConStrains identifies microbial strains in metagenomic datasets. Nature Biotechnology 33:1045–1052 DOI.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.3319

14. 14.
    Assessment of Metagenomic Assembly Using Simulated Next Generation Sequencing Data · 2012

    Corrected
15. 15.

    Morgulis A, Coulouris G, Raytselis Y, Madden TL, Agarwala R, Schaffer AA. 2008. Database indexing for production MegaBLAST searches. Bioinformatics 24:1757–1764 DOI.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btn322

16. 16.
    Evaluation of shotgun metagenomics sequence classification methods using in silico and in vitro simulated communities · 2015

    No notice
17. 17.

    Riesenfeld CS, Schloss PD, Handelsman J. 2004. Metagenomics: genomic analysis of microbial communities. Annual Review of Genetics 38:525–552 DOI.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.091216

18. 18.

    Schaeffer L, Pimentel H, Bray N, Melsted P, Pachter L. 2015. Pseudoalignment for metagenomic read assignment. ArXiv preprint. arXiv:1510.07371v07372.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btx106

19. 19.

    Segata N, Waldron L, Ballarini A, Narasimhan V, Jousson O, Huttenhower C. 2012. Metagenomic microbial community profiling using unique clade-specific marker genes. Nature Methods 9:811–814 DOI.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.2066

20. 20.

    Sohn M, An L, Pookhao N, Li Q. 2014. Accurate genome relative abundance estimation for closely related species in a metagnomic sample. BMC Bioinformatics 15:Article 242 DOI.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2105-15-242

21. 21.

    The International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. 2001. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409:860–921 DOI.

    Not in our library10.1038/35057062

22. 22.

    Thiel T, Pratte BS, Zhong J, Goodwin L, Copeland A, Lucas S, Han C, Pitluck S, Land ML, Kyrpides NC, Woyke T. 2014. Complete genome sequence of Anabaena variabilis ATCC 29413. Standards in Genomic Sciences 9:562–573 DOI.

    Not in our library10.4056/sigs.3899418

23. 23.

    Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, Li PW, Mural RJ, Sutton GG, Smith HO, Yandell M, Evans CA, Holt RA, Gocayne JD, Amanatides P, Ballew RM, Huson DH, Wortman JR, Zhang Q, Kodira CD, Zheng XH, Chen L, Skupski M, Subramanian G, Thomas PD, Zhang J, Gabor Miklos GL, Nelson C, Broder S, Clark AG, Nadeau J, McKusick VA, Zinder N, Levine AJ, Roberts RJ, Simon M, Slayman C, Hunkapiller M, Bolanos R, Delcher A, Dew I, Fasulo D, Flanigan M, Florea L, Halpern A, Hannenhalli S, Kravitz S, Levy S, Mobarry C, Reinert K, Remington K, Abu-Threideh J, Beasley E, Biddick K, Bonazzi V, Brandon R, Cargill M, Chandramouliswaran I, Charlab R, Chaturvedi K, Deng Z, Di Francesco V, Dunn P, Eilbeck K, Evangelista C, Gabrielian AE, Gan W, Ge W, Gong F, Gu Z, Guan P, Heiman TJ, Higgins ME, Ji RR, Ke Z, Ketchum KA, Lai Z, Lei Y, Li Z, Li J, Liang Y, Lin X, Lu F, Merkulov GV, Milshina N, Moore HM, Naik AK, Narayan VA, Neelam B, Nusskern D, Rusch DB, Salzberg S, Shao W, Shue B, Sun J, Wang Z, Wang A, Wang X, Wang J, Wei M, Wides R, Xiao C, Yan C, Yao A, Ye J, Zhan M, Zhang W, Zhang H, Zhao Q, Zheng L, Zhong F, Zhong W, Zhu S, Zhao S, Gilbert D, Baumhueter S, Spier G, Carter C, Cravchik A, Woodage T, Ali F, An H, Awe A, Baldwin D, Baden H, Barnstead M, Barrow I, Beeson K, Busam D, Carver A, Center A, Cheng ML, Curry L, Danaher S, Davenport L, Desilets R, Dietz S, Dodson K, Doup L, Ferriera S, Garg N, Gluecksmann A, Hart B, Haynes J, Haynes C, Heiner C, Hladun S, Hostin D, Houck J, Howland T, Ibegwam C, Johnson J, Kalush F, Kline L, Koduru S, Love A, Mann F, May D, McCawley S, McIntosh T, McMullen I, Moy M, Moy L, Murphy B, Nelson K, Pfannkoch C, Pratts E, Puri V, Qureshi H, Reardon M, Rodriguez R, Rogers YH, Romblad D, Ruhfel B, Scott R, Sitter C, Smallwood M, Stewart E, Strong R, Suh E, Thomas R, Tint NN, Tse S, Vech C, Wang G, Wetter J, Williams S, Williams M, Windsor S, Winn-Deen E, Wolfe K, Zaveri J, Zaveri K, Abril JF, Guigo R, Campbell MJ, Sjolander KV, Karlak B, Kejariwal A, Mi H, Lazareva B, Hatton T, Narechania A, 2001. The sequence of the human genome. Science 291:1304–1351 DOI.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1058040

24. 24.

    Venter JC, Remington K, Heidelberg JF, Halpern AL, Rusch D, Eisen JA, Wu D, Paulsen I, Nelson KE, Nelson W, Fouts DE, Levy S, Knap AH, Lomas MW, Nealson K, White O, Peterson J, Hoffman J, Parsons R, Baden-Tillson H, Pfannkoch C, Rogers YH, Smith HO. 2004. Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science 304:66–74 DOI.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1093857

25. 25.
    Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments · 2014

    No notice
26. 26.

    Xia LC, Cram JA, Chen T, Fuhrman JA, Fengzhu S. 2011. Accurate genome relative abundance estimation based on shotgun metgenomic reads. PLoS ONE 6:e27992 DOI.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0027992

Cited by papers we hold 49

• Metagenomic estimation of absolute bacterial biomass in the mammalian gut through host-derived read normalization · 2025
  Not checked
• Host genetic regulation of human gut microbial structural variation · 2024
  No notice
• Wekemo Bioincloud: A user‐friendly platform for meta‐omics data analyses · 2024
  No notice
• Synergy and oxygen adaptation for development of next-generation probiotics · 2023
  No notice
• Deficient butyrate-producing capacity in the gut microbiome is associated with bacterial network disturbances and fatigue symptoms in ME/CFS · 2023
  No notice
• Extending and improving metagenomic taxonomic profiling with uncharacterized species using MetaPhlAn 4 · 2023
  No notice
• Strain level microbial detection and quantification with applications to single cell metagenomics · 2022
  Not checked
• Developing whole cell standards for the microbiome field · 2022
  Not checked
• Genomic reconstruction of short-chain fatty acid production by the human gut microbiota · 2022
  Not checked
• Phylogeny-Aware Analysis of Metagenome Community Ecology Based on Matched Reference Genomes while Bypassing Taxonomy · 2022
  Corrected
• Cultivation-independent genomes greatly expand taxonomic-profiling capabilities of mOTUs across various environments · 2022
  No notice
• The Mouse Gastrointestinal Bacteria Catalogue enables translation between the mouse and human gut microbiotas via functional mapping · 2022
  No notice
• Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation: the second round of challenges · 2022
  No notice
• Intratumor microbiome features reveal antitumor potentials of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma · 2022
  No notice
• Multi-kingdom microbiota analyses identify bacterial–fungal interactions and biomarkers of colorectal cancer across cohorts · 2022
  No notice
• Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets · 2022
  No notice
• Characterization of interactions of dietary cholesterol with the murine and human gut microbiome · 2022
  No notice
• Nivolumab plus ipilimumab with or without live bacterial supplementation in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomized phase 1 trial · 2022
  No notice
• Performance of Multiple Metagenomics Pipelines in Understanding Microbial Diversity of a Low-Biomass Spacecraft Assembly Facility · 2021
  Not checked
• Tumor microbiome contributes to an aggressive phenotype in the basal-like subtype of pancreatic cancer · 2021
  No notice

and 29 more

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.