Skip to content
naulon
Get started

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 31, 2026.

CHiCAGO: robust detection of DNA looping interactions in Capture Hi-C data

Jonathan Cairns, Paula Freire-Pritchett, Steven W. Wingett and 9 more

Genome Biology · 2016

doi:10.1101/028068

Abstract

Electronic supplementary material. The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-016-0992-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References 62

  1. 1.

    Dekker J, Marti-Renom MA, Mirny LA. Exploring the three-dimensional organization of genomes: interpreting chromatin interaction data. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14:390-403.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg3454

  2. 2.

    van Steensel B, Dekker J. Genomics tools for unraveling chromosome architecture. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:1089-1095.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.1680

  3. 3.

    Mifsud B, Tavares-Cadete F, Young AN, Sugar R, Schoenfelder S, Ferreira L, et al. Mapping long-range promoter contacts in human cells with high-resolution capture Hi-C. Nat Genet. 2015;47:598-606.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.3286

  4. 4.
    The pluripotent regulatory circuitry connecting promoters to their long-range interacting elements · 2015
    No notice
  5. 5.

    Schoenfelder S, Sugar R, Dimond A, Javierre BM, Armstrong H, Mifsud B, et al. Polycomb repressive complex PRC1 spatially constrains the mouse embryonic stem cell genome. Nat Genet. 2015;47:1179-1186.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.3393

  6. 6.

    Dryden NH, Broome LR, Dudbridge F, Johnson N, Orr N, Schoenfelder S, et al. Unbiased analysis of potential targets of breast cancer susceptibility loci by Capture Hi-C. Genome Res. 2014;24:1854-1868.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.175034.114

  7. 7.
    Capture Hi-C identifies the chromatin interactome of colorectal cancer risk loci · 2015
    No notice
  8. 8.

    Imakaev M, Fudenberg G, McCord RP, Naumova N, Goloborodko A, Lajoie BR, et al. Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization. Nat Methods. 2012;9:999-1003.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.2148

  9. 9.

    Sanyal A, Lajoie BR, Jain G, Dekker J. The long-range interaction landscape of gene promoters. Nature. 2012;489:109-113.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11279

  10. 10.

    Yaffe E, Tanay A. Probabilistic modeling of Hi-C contact maps eliminates systematic biases to characterize global chromosomal architecture. Nat Genet. 2011;43:1059-1065.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.947

  11. 11.

    Sahlen P, Abdullayev I, Ramskold D, Matskova L, Rilakovic N, Lotstedt B, et al. Genome-wide mapping of promoter-anchored interactions with close to single-enhancer resolution. Genome Biol. 2015;16:156.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13059-015-0727-9

  12. 12.

    van de Werken HJ, Landan G, Holwerda SJ, Hoichman M, Klous P, Chachik R, et al. Robust 4C-seq data analysis to screen for regulatory DNA interactions. Nat Methods. 2012;9:969-972.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.2173

  13. 13.

    Klein FA, Pakozdi T, Anders S, Ghavi-Helm Y, Furlong EE, Huber W. FourCSeq: analysis of 4C sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3085-3091.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btv335

  14. 14.

    Raviram R, Rocha PP, Müller CL, Miraldi ER, Badri S, Fu Y, et al. 4C-ker: a method to reproducibly identify genome-wide interactions captured by 4C-Seq experiments. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016;12:e1004780.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004780

  15. 15.

    Genovese CR, Roeder K, Wasserman L. False discovery control with p-value weighting. Biometrika. 2006;93:509-524.

    Not in our library10.1093/biomet/93.3.509

  16. 16.

    Ay F, Bailey TL, Noble WS. Statistical confidence estimation for Hi-C data reveals regulatory chromatin contacts. Genome Res. 2014;24:999-1011.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.160374.113

  17. 17.

    Thongjuea S, Stadhouders R, Grosveld FG, Soler E, Lenhard B. r3Cseq: an R/Bioconductor package for the discovery of long-range genomic interactions from chromosome conformation capture and next-generation sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:e132.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkt373

  18. 18.

    Rosa A, Becker NB, Everaers R. Looping probabilities in model interphase chromosomes. Biophys J. 2010;98:2410-2419.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bpj.2010.01.054

  19. 19.
    Diffusion-Driven Looping Provides a Consistent Framework for Chromatin Organization · 2010
    No notice
  20. 20.

    Gui J, Tosteson T, Borsuk M. Weighted multiple testing procedures for genomic studies. BioData Mining. 2012;5:4.

    Not in our library10.1186/1756-0381-5-4

  21. 21.

    Ong C-T, Corces VG. CTCF: an architectural protein bridging genome topology and function. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15:234-246.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg3663

  22. 22.

    Maurano MT, Humbert R, Rynes E, Thurman RE, Haugen E, Wang H, et al. Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA. Science. 2012;337:1190-1195.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1222794

  23. 23.

    Trynka G, Westra H-J, Slowikowski K, Hu X, Xu H, Stranger Barbara E, et al. Disentangling the effects of colocalizing genomic annotations to functionally prioritize non-coding variants within complex-trait loci. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;97:139-152.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.05.016

  24. 24.

    Akhtar W, de Jong J, Pindyurin AV, Pagie L, Meuleman W, de Ridder J, et al. Chromatin position effects assayed by thousands of reporters integrated in parallel. Cell. 2013;154:914-927.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.018

  25. 25.

    Sexton T, Umlauf D, Kurukuti S, Fraser P. The role of transcription factories in large-scale structure and dynamics of interphase chromatin. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2007;18:691-697.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.08.008

  26. 26.

    Ma T, Van Tine BA, Wei Y, Garrett MD, Nelson D, Adams PD, et al. Cell cycle-regulated phosphorylation of p220(NPAT) by cyclin E/Cdk2 in Cajal bodies promotes histone gene transcription. Genes Dev. 2000;14:2298-2313.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.829500

  27. 27.
    Cajal bodies are linked to genome conformation · 2016
    No notice
  28. 28.

    Heinz S, Benner C, Spann N, Bertolino E, Lin YC, Laslo P, et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell. 38:576–89.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.004

  29. 29.

    Mifsud B, Martincorena I, Darbo E, Sugar R, Schoenfelder S, Fraser P, Luscombe N. GOTHiC, a simple probabilistic model to resolve complex biases and to identify real interactions in Hi-C data. biorXiv preprint. 2015;10.1101/023317.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0174744

  30. 30.

    Hu M, Deng K, Selvaraj S, Qin Z, Ren B, Liu JS. HiCNorm: removing biases in Hi-C data via Poisson regression. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:3131-3133.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bts570

  31. 31.

    Dudoit S, van der Laan MJ. Multiple testing procedures with applications to genomics. 2008.

    Not in our library

  32. 32.

    Sun L, Craiu RV, Paterson AD, Bull SB. Stratified false discovery control for large-scale hypothesis testing with application to genome-wide association studies. Genet Epidemiol. 2006;30:519-530.

    Not in our library10.1002/gepi.20164

  33. 33.

    Lin WY, Lee WC. Improving power of genome-wide association studies with weighted false discovery rate control and prioritized subset analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33716.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0033716

  34. 34.

    Roeder K, Wasserman L. Genome-wide significance levels and weighted hypothesis testing. Stat Sci. 2009;24:398-413.

    Not in our library10.1214/09-sts289

  35. 35.

    Li L, Kabesch M, Bouzigon E, Demenais F, Farrall M, Moffatt MF, et al. Using eQTL weights to improve power for genome-wide association studies: a genetic study of childhood asthma. Front Genet. 2013;4:103.

    Not in our library10.3389/fgene.2013.00103

  36. 36.

    Ignatiadis N, Klaus B, Zaugg JB, Huber W. Data-driven hypothesis weighting increases detection power in genome-scale multiple testing. Nat. Methods. 2016; doi:10.1038/nmeth.3885.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.3885

  37. 37.

    Zhao H, Fung WK. A powerful FDR control procedure for multiple hypotheses. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2016;98:60-70.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.csda.2015.12.013

  38. 38.

    Li Q, Brown JB, Huang H, Bickel PJ. Measuring reproducibility of high-throughput. Ann Appl Stat. 2011;5:1752-1779.

    Not in our library10.1214/11-aoas466

  39. 39.

    Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1995;57:289-300.

    Not in our library

  40. 40.
    Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2 · 2014
    No notice
  41. 41.
    Discovering collectively informative descriptors from high-throughput experiments · 2009
    Not checked
  42. 42.

    Blangiardo M, Cassese A, Richardson S. sdef: an R package to synthesize lists of significant features in related experiments. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:1-10.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2105-11-270

  43. 43.

    Xu Z, Zhang G, Jin F, Chen M, Furey TS, Sullivan PF, et al. A hidden Markov random field-based Bayesian method for the detection of long-range chromosomal interactions in Hi-C data. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:650-656.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btv650

  44. 44.

    Dixon JR, Selvaraj S, Yue F, Kim A, Li Y, Shen Y, et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature. 2012;485:376-380.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11082

  45. 45.

    The CHiCAGO home page. http://www.regulatorygenomicsgroup.org/chicago.Accessed 25 May 2016.

    Not in our library

  46. 46.

    HiCUP. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/hicup/overview/. Accessed 25 May 2016.

    Not in our library

  47. 47.
    HiCUP: pipeline for mapping and processing Hi-C data · 2015
    No notice
  48. 48.
    Differential expression analysis for sequence count data · 2010
    No notice
  49. 49.

    Nelder JA, Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J. 1965;7:308-313.

    Not in our library10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308

  50. 50.

    R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015.

    Not in our library

  51. 51.

    data.table: Extension of data.frame. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=data.table. Accessed 25 May 2016.

    Not in our library

  52. 52.

    Huber W, Carey VJ, Gentleman R, Anders S, Carlson M, Carvalho BS, et al. Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with Bioconductor. Nat Methods. 2015;12:115-121.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.3252

  53. 53.

    The Chicago R package on Bioconductor. http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/Chicago.html. Accesseed 25 May 2016.

    Not in our library

  54. 54.

    ArrayExpress—functional genomics data. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/. Accessed 25 May 2016.

    Not in our library

  55. 55.
    ArrayExpress update—simplifying data submissions · 2014
    No notice
  56. 56.

    Analysis of Promoter Capture Hi-C data for GM12878 and mouse ES cells using the CHiCAGO pipeline. http://osf.io/nemc6. Accessed 18 May 2016.

    Not in our library

  57. 57.

    NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE81503. Accessed 25 May 2016.

    Not in our library

  58. 58.

    WashU Epigenome Browser. http://epigenomegateway.wustl.edu. Accessed 25 May 2016.

    Not in our library

  59. 59.

    Zhou X, Lowdon RF, Li D, Lawson HA, Madden PA, Costello JF, et al. Exploring long-range genome interactions using the WashU Epigenome Browser. Nat Methods. 2013;10:375-376.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.2440

  60. 60.

    Ernst J, Kellis M. ChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization. Nat Methods. 2012;9:215-216.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.1906

  61. 61.

    ENCODE Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012;489:57-74.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11247

  62. 62.

    Yue F, Cheng Y, Breschi A, Vierstra J, Wu W, Ryba T, et al. A comparative encyclopedia of DNA elements in the mouse genome. Nature. 2014;515:355-364.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature13992

Cited by papers we hold 20

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.