No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.

Sequence co-evolution gives 3D contacts and structures of protein complexes

Thomas A Hopf, Charlotta P I Schärfe, João P G L M Rodrigues and 5 more

eLife · 2014 · CC BY

Abstract

Protein–protein interactions are fundamental to many biological processes. Experimental screens have identified tens of thousands of interactions, and structural biology has provided detailed functional insight for select 3D protein complexes. An alternative rich source of information about protein interactions is the evolutionary sequence record. Building on earlier work, we show that analysis of correlated evolutionary sequence changes across proteins identifies residues that are close in space with sufficient accuracy to determine the three-dimensional structure of the protein complexes. We evaluate prediction performance in blinded tests on 76 complexes of known 3D structure, predict protein–protein contacts in 32 complexes of unknown structure, and demonstrate how evolutionary couplings can be used to distinguish between interacting and non-interacting protein pairs in a large complex. With the current growth of sequences, we expect that the method can be generalized to genome-wide elucidation of protein–protein interaction networks and used for interaction predictions at residue resolution.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 68

1.
Andreani J, Guerois R. Evolution of protein interactions: from interactomes to interfaces. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2014;554:65-75.
Not in our library10.1016/j.abb.2014.05.010
2.
Andreani J, Faure G, Guerois R. InterEvScore: a novel coarse-grained interface scoring function using a multi-body statistical potential coupled to evolution. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1742-1749.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btt260
3.
Aurell E, Ekeberg M. Inverse Ising inference using all the data. Physical Review Letters. 2012;108:090201.
Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.108.090201
4.
Baker LA, Watt IN, Runswick MJ, Walker JE, Rubinstein JL. Arrangement of subunits in intact mammalian mitochondrial ATP synthase determined by cryo-EM. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA. 2012;109:11675-11680.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1204935109
5.
Balakrishnan S, Kamisetty H, Carbonell JG, Lee SI, Langmead CJ. Learning generative models for protein fold families. Proteins. 2011;79:1061-1078.
Not in our library10.1002/prot.22934
6.
Beuning PJ, Simon SM, Godoy VG, Jarosz DF, Walker GC. Characterization of Escherichia coli translesion synthesis polymerases and their accessory factors. Methods in Enzymology. 2006;408:318-340.
Not in our library10.1016/s0076-6879(06)08020-7
7.
Brandt K, Maiwald S, Herkenhoff-Hesselmann B, Gnirß K, Greie JC, Dunn SD, Deckers-Hebestreit G. Individual interactions of the b subunits within the stator of the Escherichia coli ATP synthase. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2013;288:24465-24479.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m113.465633
8.
Brunger AT. Version 1.2 of the Crystallography and NMR system. Nature Protocols. 2007;2:2728-2733.
Not in our library10.1038/nprot.2007.406
9.
Burger L, van Nimwegen E. Accurate prediction of protein-protein interactions from sequence alignments using a Bayesian method. Molecular Systems Biology. 2008;4:165.
Not in our library10.1038/msb4100203
10.
Benchmarking and Analysis of Protein Docking Performance in Rosetta v3.2 · 2011
No notice
11.
Cingolani G, Duncan TM. Structure of the ATP synthase catalytic complex (F(1)) from Escherichia coli in an autoinhibited conformation. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 2011;18:701-707.
Not in our library10.1038/nsmb.2058
12.
de Juan D, Pazos F, Valencia A. Emerging methods in protein co-evolution. Nature reviews. Genetics. 2013;14:249-261.
Not in our library10.1038/nrg3414
13.
de Vries SJ, van Dijk AD, Krzeminski M, van Dijk M, Thureau A, Hsu V, Wassenaar T, Bonvin AM. HADDOCK versus HADDOCK: new features and performance of HADDOCK2.0 on the CAPRI targets. Proteins. 2007;69:726-733.
Not in our library10.1002/prot.21723
14.
DeLeon-Rangel J, Zhang D, Vik SB. The role of transmembrane span 2 in the structure and function of subunit a of the ATP synthase from Escherichia coli. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2003;418:55-62.
Not in our library10.1016/s0003-9861(03)00391-6
15.
DeLeon-Rangel J, Ishmukhametov RR, Jiang W, Fillingame RH, Vik SB. Interactions between subunits a and b in the rotary ATP synthase as determined by cross-linking. FEBS Letters. 2013;587:892-897.
Not in our library10.1016/j.febslet.2013.02.012
16.
Dmitriev OY, Jones PC, Fillingame RH. Structure of the subunit c oligomer in the F1Fo ATP synthase: model derived from solution structure of the monomer and cross-linking in the native enzyme. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA. 1999;96:7785-7790.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.96.14.7785
17.
Dominguez C, Boelens R, Bonvin AM. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2003;125:1731-1737.
Not in our library10.1021/ja026939x
18.
Ekeberg M, Lovkvist C, Lan Y, Weigt M, Aurell E. Improved contact prediction in proteins: using pseudolikelihoods to infer Potts models. Physical Review. E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics. 2013;87:012707.
Not in our library10.1103/physreve.87.012707
19.
Faure G, Andreani J, Guerois R. InterEvol database: exploring the structure and evolution of protein complex interfaces. Nucleic Acids Research. 2012;40:D847-D856.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkr845
20.
Fernandez-Recio J, Totrov M, Abagyan R. Identification of protein-protein interaction sites from docking energy landscapes. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2004;335:843-865.
Not in our library10.1016/j.jmb.2003.10.069
21.
Fillingame RH, Steed PR. Half channels mediating H transport and the mechanism of gating in the F sector of Escherichia coli FF ATP synthase. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta. 2014.
Not in our library10.1016/j.bbabio.2014.03.005
22.
Gobel U, Sander C, Schneider R, Valencia A. Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins. 1994;18:309-317.
Not in our library10.1002/prot.340180402
23.
Hart GT, Ramani AK, Marcotte EM. How complete are current yeast and human protein-interaction networks? Genome Biology. 2006;7:120.
Not in our library10.1186/gb-2006-7-11-120
24.
Hopf TA, Colwell LJ, Sheridan R, Rost B, Sander C, Marks DS. Three-dimensional structures of membrane proteins from genomic sequencing. Cell. 2012;149:1607-1621.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.012
25.
Sequence co-evolution gives 3D contacts and structures of protein complexes · 2014
No notice
26.
Hvorup RN, Goetz BA, Niederer M, Hollenstein K, Perozo E, Locher KP. Asymmetry in the structure of the ABC transporter-binding protein complex BtuCD-BtuF. Science. 2007;317:1387-1390.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1145950
27.
Hidden Markov model speed heuristic and iterative HMM search procedure · 2010
No notice
28.
Johnson E, Nguyen PT, Yeates TO, Rees DC. Inward facing conformations of the MetNI methionine ABC transporter: Implications for the mechanism of transinhibition. Protein Science. 2012;21:84-96.
Not in our library10.1002/pro.765
29.
Jones DT, Buchan DW, Cozzetto D, Pontil M. PSICOV: precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:184-190.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btr638
30.
Kadaba NS, Kaiser JT, Johnson E, Lee A, Rees DC. The high-affinity E. coli methionine ABC transporter: structure and allosteric regulation. Science. 2008;321:250-253.
Not in our library10.1126/science.1157987
31.
Kamisetty H, Ovchinnikov S, Baker D. Assessing the utility of coevolution-based residue-residue contact predictions in a sequence- and structure-rich era. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA. 2013;110:15674-15679.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1314045110
32.
Karaca E, Bonvin AM. Advances in integrative modeling of biomolecular complexes. Methods. 2013;59:372-381.
Not in our library10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.12.004
33.
Kortemme T, Baker D. A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein-protein complexes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA. 2002;99:14116-14121.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.202485799
34.
Kortemme T, Baker D. Computational design of protein-protein interactions. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 2004;8:91-97.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cbpa.2003.12.008
35.
Kortemme T, Joachimiak LA, Bullock AN, Schuler AD, Stoddard BL, Baker D. Computational redesign of protein-protein interaction specificity. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 2004;11:371-379.
Not in our library10.1038/nsmb749
36.
Krivov GG, Shapovalov MV, Dunbrack RL. Improved prediction of protein side-chain conformations with SCWRL4. Proteins. 2009;77:778-795.
Not in our library10.1002/prot.22488
37.
Liang Y, Gao Z, Wang F, Zhang Y, Dong Y, Liu Q. Structural and functional Characterization of Escherichia coli toxin-antitoxin complex DinJ-YafQ. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2014;289:21191-21202.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m114.559773
38.
Linge JP, Habeck M, Rieping W, Nilges M. ARIA:automated NOE assignment and NMR structure calculation. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:315-316.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.315
39.
Long JC, DeLeon-Rangel J, Vik SB. Characterization of the first cytoplasmic loop of subunit a of the Escherichia coli ATP synthase by surface labeling, cross-linking, and mutagenesis. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2002;277:27288-27293.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m202118200
40.
Protein 3D Structure Computed from Evolutionary Sequence Variation · 2011
No notice
41.
Marks DS, Hopf TA, Sander C. Protein structure prediction from sequence variation. Nature Biotechnology. 2012;30:1072-1080.
Not in our library10.1038/nbt.2419
42.
McLachlin DT, Dunn SD. Disulfide linkage of the b and delta subunits does not affect the function of the Escherichia coli ATP synthase. Biochemistry. 2000;39:3486-3490.
Not in our library10.1021/bi992586b
43.
Morcos F, Pagnani A, Lunt B, Bertolino A, Marks DS, Sander C, Zecchina R, Onuchic JN, Hwa T, Weigt M. Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA. 2011;108:E1293-E1301.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1111471108
44.
Mosca R, Ceol A, Aloy P. Interactome3D: adding structural details to protein networks. Nature Methods. 2012;10:47-53.
Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.2289
45.
Nugent T, Jones DT. Accurate de novo structure prediction of large transmembrane protein domains using fragment-assembly and correlated mutation analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA. 2012;109:E1540-E1547.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1120036109
46.
Robust and accurate prediction of residue–residue interactions across protein interfaces using evolutionary information · 2014
No notice
47.
Pakseresht N, Alako B, Amid C, Cerdeño-Tárraga A, Cleland I, Gibson R, Goodgame N, Gur T, Jang M, Kay S, Leinonen R, Li W, Liu X, Lopez R, McWilliam H, Oisel A, Pallreddy S, Plaister S, Radhakrishnan R, Rivière S, Rossello M, Senf A, Silvester N, Smirnov D, Squizzato S, ten Hoopen P, Toribio AL, Vaughan D, Zalunin V, Cochrane G. Assembly information services in the European Nucleotide Archive. Nucleic Acids Research. 2014;42:D38-D43.
Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkt1082
48.
Pazos F, Valencia A. Similarity of phylogenetic trees as indicator of protein-protein interaction. Protein Engineering. 2001;14:609-614.
Not in our library10.1093/protein/14.9.609
49.
Pazos F, Valencia A. In silico two-hybrid system for the selection of physically interacting protein pairs. Proteins. 2002;47:219-227.
Not in our library10.1002/prot.10074
50.
Pazos F, Helmer-Citterich M, Ausiello G, Valencia A. Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction. Journal of Molecular Biology. 1997;271:511-523.
Not in our library10.1006/jmbi.1997.1198
51.
Perez F, Granger BE. IPython: a system for Interactive Scientific computing. Computing in Science and Engineering. 2007;9:21-29.
Not in our library10.1109/mcse.2007.53
52.
Rajagopala SV, Sikorski P, Kumar A, Mosca R, Vlasblom J, Arnold R, Franca-Koh J, Pakala SB, Phanse S, Ceol A, Häuser R, Siszler G, Wuchty S, Emili A, Babu M, Aloy P, Pieper R, Uetz P. The binary protein-protein interaction landscape of Escherichia coli. Nature Biotechnology. 2014;32:285-290.
Not in our library10.1038/nbt.2831
53.
Rastogi VK, Girvin ME. Structural changes linked to proton translocation by subunit c of the ATP synthase. Nature. 1999;402:263-268.
Not in our library10.1038/46224
54.
Rodgers AJ, Wilce MC. Structure of the gamma-epsilon complex of ATP synthase. Nat Struct Biol. 2000;7:1051-1054.
Not in our library10.1038/80975
55.
Rodrigues JP, Melquiond AS, Karaca E, Trellet M, van Dijk M, van Zundert GC, Schmitz C, de Vries SJ, Bordogna A, Bonati L, Kastritis PL, Bonvin AM. Defining the limits of homology modelling in information-driven protein docking. Proteins. 2013;81:2119-2128.
Not in our library10.1002/prot.24382
56.
Sastry GM, Adzhigirey M, Day T, Annabhimoju R, Sherman W. Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments. Journal of Computer-aided Molecular Design. 2013;27:221-234.
Not in our library10.1007/s10822-013-9644-8
57.
Schneidman-Duhovny D, Rossi A, Avila-Sakar A, Kim SJ, Velázquez-Muriel J, Strop P, Liang H, Krukenberg KA, Liao M, Kim HM, Sobhanifar S, Dötsch V, Rajpal A, Pons J, Agard DA, Cheng Y, Sali A. A method for integrative structure determination of protein-protein complexes. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:3282-3289.
Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bts628
58.
Schulenberg B, Aggeler R, Murray J, Capaldi RA. The gammaepsilon-c subunit interface in the ATP synthase of Escherichia coli. cross-linking of the epsilon subunit to the c subunit ring does not impair enzyme function, that of gamma to c subunits leads to uncoupling. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1999;274:34233-34237.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.274.48.34233
59.
Schwem BE, Fillingame RH. Cross-linking between helices within subunit a of Escherichia coli ATP synthase defines the transmembrane packing of a four-helix bundle. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2006;281:37861-37867.
Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m607453200
60.
Skerker JM, Perchuk BS, Siryaporn A, Lubin EA, Ashenberg O, Goulian M, Laub MT. Rewiring the specificity of two-component signal transduction systems. Cell. 2008;133:1043-1054.
Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2008.04.040
61.
Svensson HG, Wedemeyer WJ, Ekstrom JL, Callender DR, Kortemme T, Kim DE, Sjöbring U, Baker D. Contributions of amino acid side chains to the kinetics and thermodynamics of the bivalent binding of protein L to Ig kappa light chain. Biochemistry. 2004;43:2445-2457.
Not in our library10.1021/bi034873s
62.
Uhlin U, Cox GB, Guss JM. Crystal structure of the epsilon subunit of the proton-translocating ATP synthase from Escherichia coli. Structure. 1997;5:1219-1230.
Not in our library10.1016/s0969-2126(97)00272-4
63.
Activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) · 2013
No notice
64.
Velazquez-Muriel J, Lasker K, Russel D, Phillips J, Webb BM, Schneidman-Duhovny D, Sali A. Assembly of macromolecular complexes by satisfaction of spatial restraints from electron microscopy images. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA. 2012;109:18821-18826.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1216549109
65.
Walker JE. The ATP synthase: the understood, the uncertain and the unknown. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2013;41:1-16.
Not in our library10.1042/bst20110773
66.
Webb B, Lasker K, Velázquez-Muriel J, Schneidman-Duhovny D, Pellarin R, Bonomi M, Greenberg C, Raveh B, Tjioe E, Russel D, Sali A. Modeling of proteins and their assemblies with the Integrative Modeling Platform. Methods in molecular biology. 2014;1091:277-295.
Not in our library10.1007/978-1-62703-691-7_20
67.
Weigt M, White RA, Szurmant H, Hoch JA, Hwa T. Identification of direct residue contacts in protein-protein interaction by message passing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA. 2009;106:67-72.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0805923106
68.
Zhang QC, Petrey D, Deng L, Qiang L, Shi Y, Thu CA, Bisikirska B, Lefebvre C, Accili D, Hunter T, Maniatis T, Califano A, Honig B. Structure-based prediction of protein-protein interactions on a genome-wide scale. Nature. 2012;490:556-560.
Not in our library10.1038/nature11503

Cited by papers we hold 15

Pathogen-driven cancers from a structural perspective: Targeting host-pathogen protein-protein interactions · 2023
Not checked
Protein complexes in cells by AI‐assisted structural proteomics · 2023
No notice
From complete cross-docking to partners identification and binding sites predictions. · 2022
Not checked
Analysis of 6.4 million SARS-CoV-2 genomes identifies mutations associated with fitness · 2022
No notice
Benchmarking AlphaFold for protein complex modeling reveals accuracy determinants · 2022
No notice
Protein design and variant prediction using autoregressive generative models · 2021
No notice
ECNet is an evolutionary context-integrated deep learning framework for protein engineering · 2021
No notice
A multi-scale coevolutionary approach to predict interactions between protein domains. · 2019
Not checked
SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes · 2018
No notice
Numerical Encodings of Amino Acids in Multivariate Gaussian Modeling of Protein Multiple Sequence Alignments · 2018
Not checked
Synthetic protein alignments by CCMgen quantify noise in residue-residue contact prediction. · 2018
Not checked
Modeling protein quaternary structure of homo- and hetero-oligomers beyond binary interactions by homology · 2017
No notice
Inter-Protein Sequence Co-Evolution Predicts Known Physical Interactions in Bacterial Ribosomes and the Trp Operon. · 2016
Not checked
Large-scale determination of previously unsolved protein structures using evolutionary information · 2015
No notice
Robust and accurate prediction of residue–residue interactions across protein interfaces using evolutionary information · 2014
No notice

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.