Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 17, 2026.

Enhanced secondary pollution offset reduction of primary emissions during COVID-19 lockdown in China

Xin Huang, Aijun Ding, Jian Gao and 24 more

National Science Review · 2020 · CC BY

doi:10.1093/nsr/nwaa137

Abstract

To control the spread of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19), China imposed nationwide restrictions on the movement of its population (lockdown) after the Chinese New Year of 2020, leading to large reductions in economic activities and associated emissions. Despite such large decreases in primary pollution, there were nonetheless several periods of heavy haze pollution in eastern China, raising questions about the well-established relationship between human activities and air quality. Here, using comprehensive measurements and modeling, we show that the haze during the COVID lockdown was driven by enhancements of secondary pollution. In particular, large decreases in NOx emissions from transportation increased ozone and nighttime NO3 radical formation, and these increases in atmospheric oxidizing capacity in turn facilitated the formation of secondary particulate matter. Our results, afforded by the tragic natural experiment of the COVID-19 pandemic, indicate that haze mitigation depends upon a coordinated and balanced strategy for controlling multiple pollutants.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 17, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

INTRODUCTION

Efforts to control the spread of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) have drastically reduced human activities worldwide. As one of the epicenters of the pandemic, China was the first country to shut down commercial activities, restrict travel and require its people to stay home beginning in late January 2020. These restrictions are believed to have drastically decreased air pollutant emissions. For example, the TROPOMI instrument on the Sentinel 5P satellite observed approximately 65% decrease in tropospheric NO2 columns over the eastern China region compared to the same period in 2019. Previous studies have shown that heavy haze pollution in eastern China has primarily been driven by accumulated anthropogenic emissions together with rapid secondary production. Indeed, strict policies reduced anthropogenic air pollution emissions between 2013–17 and have been the main driver of decreases in PM2.5 (particles with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 2.5 μm) pollution in China.

Yet despite large reductions in primary pollutant emissions, there were several heavy haze events over eastern China during the COVID-19 lockdown, which have seeded doubt among the Chinese public and policymakers regarding the current scientific understanding of the mechanisms of haze pollution. Here, using comprehensive measurements of the mass and chemical compositions of PM2.5 as well as related trace gases, together with numerical model simulations, we show that secondary pollution during the COVID lockdown was unexpectedly enhanced as the result of imbalances in the reduction of primary emissions. Our findings thus underscore the importance of a carefully tailored and balanced strategy of emission control to reduce haze pollution in China.

OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCES OF ENHANCED SECONDARY PM FORMATION

Figure 1 and Fig. S1 in the Supplementary Data show the large change in pollutant emissions during the three weeks of the Chinese New Year holiday and the COVID lockdown that immediately followed (the lock period) in comparison with the three weeks before the Chinese New Year (pre-period), based on the real-time measurement by air quality monitoring network. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels decline sharply (by >60%) during the lockdown, consistent with both the reduction in human activities reflected by the transportation index (Fig. 1a and e) and satellite observations (Fig. S2). Other primary gaseous pollutants such as carbon monoxide (CO) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) show patterns similar to NO2 (Fig. S1). Yet concentrations of PM2.5—perhaps the most important air pollutant from a public health perspective—do not show the same decrease over eastern China, but instead increase in the area of Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei (BTH) and in the northern part of China (Fig. 1b and e). Meanwhile, ozone (O3), which is an important secondary pollutant in warmer months but generally of less concern in winter, was also substantially enhanced (in some cases by >100%) over all of eastern China (Fig. 1e). The distribution of pollutant levels shows systematic shifts in O3 and NO2 in the heavily populated BTH and Yangtze River Delta (YRD) areas of eastern China during the COVID lockdown, with less change in PM2.5, particularly in the BTH region (Fig. S3). The ratio of PM2.5/CO, an indicator of secondary pollutants to primary emission, reveals a large-scale enhancement throughout northern China (Fig. 1d). The anomalies in all these species diminished near the end of February, when COVID restrictions began to be eased and people outside of the Hubei province started back to work (Fig. 1e).

The observed changes in primary pollutants are proportionate to reductions in emissions during the COVID lockdown. Emissions estimates based on up-to-date activity levels suggest an overall reduction of NOx about 60%–70% in eastern China, 70%–80% of which was related to road traffic and 20%–25% from industry and power plants (Table S1). Model simulations with fixed emission inventory without reduction considered (to exclude the possible influence of synoptic weather on air pollution) show very large bias from observations, which also confirms the change in primary reduction (NOx) and elevated O3 and PM2.5, especially in the BTH region (Fig. S4). Importantly, studies of previous changes in pollution emissions have never found such a pronounced increase in secondary pollutants like O3 and PM2.5. But the reduction in primary pollutants during the COVID lockdown is also more extreme than those observed previously (e.g. during past holidays or special events such as the 2008 Olympics or the 2014 meeting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation in Beijing).

Previous studies have suggested many different processes of secondary PM formation in northern China. To investigate the causes for the increase in PM2.5 in eastern China during the COVID lockdown, we examine the chemical compositions of PM2.5 from a regional network in northern and eastern China. Because elemental carbon (EC) is mainly from primary emissions, the relative change in concentration of secondary species, e.g. sulfate, nitrate, ammonium and organic matter (SNAO), provides information on the enhancement of secondary PM formation. Given that secondary organic aerosol (SOA) has been reported to dominate the OM (organic matters) in megacities in China and field measurements in both Beijing and Nanjing during the study period is also indicative of the dominance of SOA in the OM (Fig. S5), here the relative change of OM to EC could reveal the secondary OM production. As shown in Fig. 2a, secondary PM production during the lockdown was especially high in eastern China in comparison to the pre-period, especially in the BTH region (with a ratio of ΔSNAO/ΔEC as high as 1.5). Such secondary formation is also consistent with the PM2.5/CO ratios from the air quality monitoring network (Fig. 1d).

The scatter plots of the ΔSNAO/ΔEC during the lockdown indicate an overall reduction in EC for all stations (the ratio of ECLock/Pre lower than 1 with a minimum as low as 0.4), but a substantial enhancement in secondary PM formation, shown by the much higher ratio of ΔSNAO/ΔECLock/Pre (Fig. 2b–e). In these scatter plots, the dots above the 1:1 line generally indicate higher proportion and an enhanced secondary production rate, but those with the y-axis above 1.0 mean increased concentrations, i.e. the reduction of primary emission offset by secondary products. For OM, sulfate and ammonium, the ratio is particularly high, ∼20%–100% (Fig. 2b, c and e), but for nitrate, the ratio is relatively low (∼−30%–60%), with some cities in the YRD and Henan Province below the 1:1 line (Fig. 2d), indicating weakened nitrate formation associated with the overall changes in NO2 and O3. The decreased nitrate formation in regions other than the BTH could explain why the PM2.5/CO ratio mainly increased in northern China (Fig. 1d). Although the difference in reduction rate of different primary OM sources may also affect the OM/ECLock/Pre ratio, given the high portion of secondary organics in megacities in China, the significantly high ratio in Fig. 2b indicates a substantial influence from enhanced production of secondary OM. Available field measurements in Beijing and Nanjing also confirmed a substantial stronger enhancement of secondary OM than primary (Fig. S5). However, for the BTH region all secondary inorganic aerosols, e.g. sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, and organics show significantly higher net chemical production (see the ratio of SNAOLock/Pre over 1.0, marked in red), thereby a pretty high concentration of PM2.5 in northern China, as shown in Fig. 1.

The diurnal cycle of the ΔSNAO/ΔECLock/Pre ratio further reveals the main processes that influence secondary PM. As shown in Fig. S6c, the secondary production of all PM species in the BTH area were enhanced (positive values) most of the day during the lockdown period, with the enhancement extending from midnight to around 9:00 LT (local time) in the morning, indicating an important role of nighttime chemistry. The enhancement of secondary aerosols coincides with the rise in ozone (over 100%) and also O3*NO2, a proxy of NO3 radical, which is a vital oxidant for nighttime secondary PM formation. However, in other regions, such as YRD, the diurnal cycle of these ratios shows an overall positive value, except for nitrate, which was consistent with the change of O3*NO2 proxy (Fig. S6d). These results imply that—although secondary haze formation was generally enhanced during the COVID lockdown—the magnitude of such secondary PM production was different in different regions, depending on O3 and the NO3 radical. This suggests the great importance of NOx on both daytime and nighttime atmospheric chemistry.

MODEL SIMULATIONS AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE DOMINANT MECHANISM

We further conduct model simulations using the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with Chemistry (WRF-Chem), based on an up-to-date emissions inventory estimated by dynamically adjusted human activity levels (Table S1 and Fig. S7). As aforementioned, we find significant decreases in atmospheric NOx, due mainly to lower vehicle emissions, which could cause a substantial increase in the availability of O3 and nighttime NO3 radical in eastern China (Fig. 3). Moreover, the simulations reproduce the enhancements of both O3 and NO3 radical in eastern China, a region with intensive anthropogenic emissions of NOx, and a decrease in southern and southwestern China (Figs 3a and S8). The diurnal cycles from both model simulations (Fig. 3b) and observation-based diagnose (Fig. S6) show that the relative changes in O3 and NO3 radical concentrations during the pre/lock periods are significant, particularly during nighttime, because of strong NO-titration existed in the pre-lockdown period (Figs 3b and S8). Accordingly, the NO3 radical increased a lot below the altitude of 1 km during the night, even if its precursor NOx declined sharply.

The enhanced atmospheric oxidizing capacity accelerated the formation of sulfuric acid (H2SO4) in the boundary layer. Comparatively, this kind of enhancement is much stronger in the BTH region than the YRD region. By diagnosing the changes in HNO3 and nitrate in WRF-Chem simulations (Fig. S9), we can explain the differences in diurnal cycle of nitrate changes in BTH and other regions (Fig. S6). Here we mainly examine those gaseous intermediate products directly linked with oxidants and secondary PM formation averaged over a regional scale. In the BTH region, a substantial increase of HNO3 occurs in the boundary layer almost the entire day with a positive nitrate formation occurring from night to early morning in the lower PBL (planetary boundary layer). However, in the YRD region, HNO3 and nitrate show an overall decrease during the COVID lockdown (Fig. S9), consistent with observations (Figs 2c and S6d).

As a result of the enhanced oxidizing capacity, the model shows a significant increase in sulfuric acid production during the daytime in eastern China (Figs 3 and S8). Observations at the Station for Observing Regional Processes of the Earth System (SORPES) in Nanjing also show an increase in sulfuric acid concentration (∼30% increase) in both the day and night of sunny days (Fig. S10). Consequently, vigorous new particle formation processes and stronger sulfate production were frequently observed at the station during the COVID lockdown. It is also worth noting that a substantially higher OM fraction at night during the lockdown period was associated with stronger daytime new particle formation (NPF) events (Fig. S10), implying that the enhanced formation of secondary PM was due to a stronger nighttime oxidization by both O3 and NO3 radical, even under the condition of decreasing precursors (i.e. volatile organic compounds (VOCs), SO2 and NOx).

Figure 4 illustrates such non-linear relationship of reduced precursors causing enhanced oxidants and secondary products over a regional scale. The elevated oxidizing capacity will enhance the proportion of secondary PM in regional-scale haze. Under typical meteorological conditions, such enhancement of secondary PM formation could cause even higher concentrations and hence offset the efforts of a substantial reduction in primary emissions in sub-regional scale, like the BTH (Fig. S11). The non-linear relationship between NOx reduction and oxidant enhancement is also evident in measurements from air quality monitoring networks. As shown in Fig. S12, the relationship of O3 and night O3*NO2 proxy vs. NO2 in BTH and YRD regions shows distinct patterns during the COVID-lock and pre-COVID periods. A more substantial enhancement of oxidizing capacity, for both O3 and NO3 radical, took place in the BTH region.

By testing the sensitivity of our WRF-Chem simulations to different NOx reduction rates (10%–90%), we find a non-linear response in both O3 and NO3 radical in eastern China (Fig. S13). These results show that the sudden and precipitous reduction in NOx emissions could cause a substantial increase of O3, NO3 radical and hence a non-linear response of oxidation products like H2SO4, HNO3 and N2O5 and oxygen-containing organic compound, which have a direct linkage to the enhancement of secondary PM species. In the BTH region, the enhancement is extremely significant because of the much higher NOx concentrations and weak incident solar radiation in northern China, which makes the NO-titration and O3-VOCs-NOx photochemistry more sensitive to the NOx reduction. Figure S13 also suggests that a further reduction of NOx (e.g. to 60%–70% in BTH and 50%–60% in YRD, achieved from industrial or residuals sectors) would reach a tipping point for decreasing oxidizing capacity. Unfortunately, the emission reductions in both regions during the COVID lockdown were almost at the peak for secondary production. A concurrent reduction in VOCs could also have reduced the non-linear relationship. As shown in Fig. S14, synchronous VOCs reduction could have partly counterbalanced the enhancement of secondary pollution due to such non-linear response. Based on matrix-type WRF-Chem simulations considering the synergetic effects from NOx and VOCs emission reduction, we obtained EKMA (empirical kinetic modeling approach) isopleths for main oxidants and gaseous oxidation products for eastern China (Fig. 5). They clearly demonstrate the high non-linear dependence of oxidants and secondary PM formation upon the reduction of primary emissions.

CONCLUSION AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Our results show that the dramatic reductions in NOx and other air pollution emissions during China's COVID lockdown led to substantial increases in O3, which in turn increased atmospheric oxidizing capacity and enhanced formation of secondary PM in eastern China. In China, winter haze and summer ozone pollution are the two major air quality challenges, but with different and separated control policies. To mitigate haze pollution, policies have focused on the reduction of primary emissions such as SO2, NOx and NH3, while efforts have been proposed to reduce ozone pollution target VOCs. Although some works partly investigated the impact of primary emission to secondary pollution based mainly on modeling in different regions, based on the natural passive control experiment during the COVID lockdown, here our study shows direct and consistent ‘observational’ and modeling evidences on the non-linear relationship of emission reduction and secondary haze pollution in the real world. Regulation of SO2 and NOx emissions imposed since 2013 have successfully reduced haze pollution in eastern China, while our results suggest that the benefit of proposed further reductions in primary emissions might be offset by enhanced secondary formation of PM. Thus, the lockdown imposed to protect public health during the COVID pandemic has shown that efforts to further decrease PM2.5 pollution in eastern China may be more challenging than anticipated. Specifically, a non-linear tipping point of NOx chemistry will require that future reductions in China's haze pollution manage the balance of emitted species, with different consideration of VOCs and NOx ratios among different regions.

Observational data and analysis method

Concentrations of NO2, O3, CO, SO2, PM2.5 and PM10 at more than 1500 stations are archived at the air monitoring data center of Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China. To demonstrate pollution variations, ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) is applied to decompose observational data. In addition, PM2.5 chemical compositions are recorded in more than 40 cities. In Nanjing, we also conducted observations on particle size distribution, VOCs and other trace gases at the SORPES station. TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) provides retrievals of NO2 column amount, which are also employed to illustrate the spatial pattern and temporal variation of air pollution around COVID-19 in China. Detailed information on observational data can be found in the supplementary text.

Emission reduction estimation due to the lockdown control

Emission reduction is estimated using the bottom-up inventory model of Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China (MEIC), developed by Tsinghua University. To estimate emission reductions due to COVID-19 lockdown, we update China's emissions data to January and February 2020 based on dynamic economic and industrial activity levels. Descriptions on emission reduction estimation due to the lockdown control are detailed in the supplementary text. The estimation of provincial emission reduction ratio of main trace gases and primary PM is presented in Table S1.

Regional air quality modeling

Coupled dynamical and chemical simulations are conducted based on WRF-Chem model. This model is demonstrated to be able to reproduce pollution in China and the configurations are given in detail in previous works. The base simulation was conducted from 1 December 2019 to 5 March 2020 by using MEIC emission inventory. We then use the up-to-date reduction ratio to understand the emission-triggered perturbations. Furthermore, hundreds of parallel simulations with various NOx and VOCs emission scenarios were performed to investigate the relationship between primary emission and secondary pollution. Given that current air quality models still face challenges for accurately characterizing secondary PM and we mainly focus on the enhancement of secondary PM formation, it is feasible to reveal the sensitivity of secondary PM based on their precursors like H2SO4, HNO3 and VOC oxidation product. Furthermore, the Lagrangian particle dispersion model HYSPLIT was used to identify transport pathways and to track potential sources. Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS) data was used to drive the model and 3000 particles released every hour from the location of concern were then tracked backward for 7 days to identify ‘footprint’ retroplume.

DATA AVAILABILITY

Daily satellite retrievals of NO2 column amount are openly accessible at http://www.temis.nl/airpollution/no2col/data/tropomi. The daily transportation index is provided by Baidu migration dataset (https://qianxi.baidu.com). NCEP (National Centers for Environmental Prediction) FNL (Final) and ADP (Automated Data Processing) observational data can be obtained from https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds083.2 and https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds351.0. GDAS data is available at NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) Air Resources Laboratory (ftp://arlftp.arlhq.noaa.gov/archives/gdas1). The simulation data used in this study are stored in the high performance computing center of Nanjing University and can be made available from the corresponding author upon request. Data processing techniques are available on request from the corresponding author. The source code of WRF-Chem model is archived on UCAR data repository (http://www2.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/download). Lagrangian dispersion model can be acquired from the NOAA Air Resources Laboratory for the provision of the HYSPLIT (Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory model) transport and dispersion model (http://www.ready.noaa.gov). The EEMD analysis code embedded in NCAR Command Language version 6.40 is available at https://www.earthsystemgrid.org/dataset/ncl.640.html.

References 54

  1. 1.
  2. 2.

    Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG et al. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet2020; 395: 470–3.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30185-9

  3. 3.

    NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Airborne Nitrogen Dioxide Plummets Over China. https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/146362/airborne-nitrogen-dioxide-plummets-over-china (10 April 2020, date last accessed).

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    Wang P, Chen K, Zhu S et al. Severe air pollution events not avoided by reduced anthropogenic activities during COVID-19 outbreak. Resour Conserv Recy2020; 158: 104814.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104814

  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.

    Sun YL, Wang ZF, Fu PQ et al. Aerosol composition, sources and processes during wintertime in Beijing, China. Atmos Chem Phys2013; 13: 4577–92.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    Huang RJ, Zhang YL, Bozzetti C et al. High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China. Nature2014; 514: 218–22.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature13774

  9. 9.

    Fu X, Wang T, Gao J et al. Persistent heavy winter nitrate pollution driven by increased photochemical oxidants in Northern China. Environ Sci Technol2020; 54: 3881–9.

    Not in our library10.1021/acs.est.9b07248

  10. 10.

    Xie Y, Ding AJ, Nie W et al. Enhanced sulfate formation by nitrogen dioxide: implications from in situ observations at the SORPES station. J Geophys Res-Atmos2015; 120: 12679–94.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Song SJ, Gao M, Xu WQ et al. Possible heterogeneous chemistry of hydroxymethanesulfonate (HMS) in northern China winter haze. Atmos Chem Phys2019; 19: 1357–71.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    Cheng YF, Zheng GJ, Wei C et al. Reactive nitrogen chemistry in aerosol water as a source of sulfate during haze events in China. Sci Adv2016; 2: e1601530.

    Not in our library10.1126/sciadv.1601530

  13. 13.

    Liu Y, Wang T. Worsening urban ozone pollution in China from 2013 to 2017—Part 2: the effects of emission changes and implications for multi-pollutant control. Atmos Chem Phys2020; 20: 6323–37.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    Zhang Q, Zheng YX, Tong D et al. Drivers of improved PM2.5 air quality in China from 2013 to 2017. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2019; 116: 24463–9.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1907956116

  15. 15.

    Ding AJ, Huang X, Nie W et al. Significant reduction of PM2.5 in eastern China due to regional-scale emission control: evidence from SORPES in 2011–2018. Atmos Chem Phys2019; 19: 11791–801.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Liu Y, Wang T. Worsening urban ozone pollution in China from 2013 to 2017 – Part 1: the complex and varying roles of meterology. Atmos Chem Phys2020; 20: 6305–21.

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    Wang T, Xue LK, Brimblecombe P et al. Ozone pollution in China: a review of concentrations, meteorological influences, chemical precursors, and effects. Sci Total Environ2017; 575: 1582–96.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.081

  18. 18.

    Li K, Jacob DJ, Liao H et al. Anthropogenic drivers of 2013–2017 trends in summer surface ozone in China. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2019; 116: 422–7.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1812168116

  19. 19.

    Xue LK, Wang T, Gao J et al. Ground-level ozone in four Chinese cities: precursors, regional transport and heterogeneous processes. Atmos Chem Phys2014; 14: 13175–88.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    Guo S, Hu M, Zamora M et al. Elucidating severe urban haze formation in China. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2014; 111: 17373–8.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1419604111

  21. 21.

    Zhang Y, Ding AJ, Mao HT et al. Impact of synoptic weather patterns and inter-decadal climate variability on air quality in the North China Plain during 1980–2013. Atmos Environ2016; 124: 119–28.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    Wang T, Nie W, Gao J et al. Air quality during the 2008 Beijing Olympics: secondary pollutants and regional impact. Atmos Chem Phys2010; 10: 7603–15.

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    Wang Y, Hao J, McElroy MB et al. Ozone air quality during the 2008 Beijing Olympics: effectiveness of emission restrictions. Atmos Chem Phys2009; 9: 5237–51.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Jiang Q, Sun YL, Wang Z et al. Aerosol composition and sources during the Chinese Spring Festival: fireworks, secondary aerosol, and holiday effects. Atmos Chem Phys2015; 15: 6023–34.

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    Xu ZN, Huang X, Nie W et al. Influence of synoptic condition and holiday effects on VOCs and ozone production in the Yangtze River Delta region, China. Atmos Environ2017; 168: 112–24.

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    Tan PH, Chou C, Liang JY et al. Air pollution ‘holiday effect’ resulting from the Chinese New Year. Atmos Environ2009; 43: 2114–24.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    Ansari TU, Wild O, Li J et al. Effectiveness of short-term air quality emission controls: a high-resolution model study of Beijing during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit period. Atmos Chem Phys2019; 19: 8651–68.

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    Wang YS, Yao L, Wang L et al. Mechanism for the formation of the January 2013 heavy haze pollution episode over central and eastern China. Sci China Earth Sci2014; 57: 14–25.

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    Cao JJ, Zhu CS, Tie XX et al. Characteristics and sources of carbonaceous aerosols from Shanghai, China. Atmos Chem Phys2013; 13: 803–17.

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    Seinfeld JH, Pankow JF. Organic atmospheric particulate material. Annu Rev Phys Chem2003; 54: 121–40.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.physchem.54.011002.103756

  31. 31.

    Brown SS, Ryerson TB, Wollny AG et al. Variability in nocturnal nitrogen oxide processing and its role in regional air quality. Science2006; 311: 67–70.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1120120

  32. 32.

    Hallquist M, Wenger JC, Baltensperger U et al. The formation, properties and impact of secondary organic aerosol: current and emerging issues. Atmos Chem Phys2009; 9: 5155–236.

    Not in our library

  33. 33.

    McDuffie EE, Fibiger DL, Dube WP et al. Heterogeneous N2O5 uptake during winter: aircraft measurements during the 2015 WINTER campaign and critical evaluation of current parameterizations. J Geophys Res-Atmos2018; 123: 4345–72.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    Kroll JH, Seinfeld JH. Chemistry of secondary organic aerosol: formation and evolution of low-volatility organics in the atmosphere. Atmos Environ2008; 42: 3593–624.

    Not in our library

  35. 35.

    Brasseur GP, Muller JF, Granier C. Atmospheric impact of NOx emissions by subsonic aircraft: a three-dimensional model study. J Geophys Res-Atmos1996; 101: 1423–8.

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    Crawford J, Davis D, Chen G et al. An assessment of ozone photochemistry in the extratropical western North Pacific: impact of continental outflow during the late winter early spring. J Geophys Res-Atmos1997; 102: 28469–87.

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    Lu K, Zhang Y, Su H et al. Oxidant (O3 + NO2) production processes and formation regimes in Beijing. J Geophys Res-Atmos2010; 115: 2009JD012714.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    Edwards PM, Aikin KC, Dube WP et al. Transition from high- to low-NOx control of night-time oxidation in the southeastern US. Nat Geosci2017; 10: 490–5.

    Not in our library

  39. 39.

    Ronald JV, Mijling B, Ding J et al. Cleaning up the air: effectiveness of air quality policy for SO2 and NOx emissions in China. Atmos Chem Phys2017; 17: 1775–89.

    Not in our library

  40. 40.

    Richter A, Burrows JP, Nuss H et al. Increase in tropospheric nitrogen dioxide over China observed from space. Nature2005; 437: 129–32.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature04092

  41. 41.

    Wang Y, Zhang Q, He K et al. Sulfate-nitrate-ammonium aerosols over China: response to 2000–2015 emission changes of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and ammonia. Atmos Chem Phys2013; 13: 2635–52.

    Not in our library

  42. 42.

    Shah V, Jaegle L, Thornton JA et al. Chemical feedbacks weaken the wintertime response of particulate sulfate and nitrate to emissions reductions over the eastern United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2018; 115: 8110–5.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1803295115

  43. 43.

    Shrivastava M, Cappa CD, Fan JW et al. Recent advances in understanding secondary organic aerosol: implications for global climate forcing. Rev Geophys2017; 55: 509–59.

    Not in our library

  44. 44.

    Gao J, Wang T, Zhou XH et al. Measurement of aerosol number size distributions in the Yangtze River delta in China: formation and growth of particles under polluted conditions. Atmos Environ2009; 43: 829–36.

    Not in our library

  45. 45.

    Liu F, Zhang Q, Tong D et al. High-resolution inventory of technologies, activities, and emissions of coal-fired power plants in China from 1990 to 2010. Atmos Chem Phys2015; 15: 13299–317.

    Not in our library

  46. 46.

    Liu MX, Huang X, Song Y et al. Ammonia emission control in China would mitigate haze pollution and nitrogen deposition, but worsen acid rain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2019; 116: 7760–5.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1814880116

  47. 47.

    Liu J, Mauzerall DL, Chen Q et al. Air pollutant emissions from Chinese households: a major and underappreciated ambient pollution source. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2016; 113: 7756–61.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1604537113

  48. 48.

    Feng T, Zhao SY, Bei NF et al. Secondary organic aerosol enhanced by increasing atmospheric oxidizing capacity in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH), China. Atmos Chem Phys2019; 19: 7429–43.

    Not in our library

  49. 49.

    Li Y, Lau AKH, Fung JCH et al. Importance of NOx control for peak ozone reduction in the Pearl River Delta region. J Geophys Res-Atmos2013; 118: 9428–43.

    Not in our library

  50. 50.

    Zhao B, Wang SX, Wang JD et al. Impact of national NOx and SO2 control policies on particulate matter pollution in China. Atmos Environ2013; 77: 453–63.

    Not in our library

  51. 51.

    Li M, Zhang Q, Streets DG et al. Mapping Asian anthropogenic emissions of non-methane volatile organic compounds to multiple chemical mechanisms. Atmos Chem Phys2014; 14: 5617–38.

    Not in our library

  52. 52.

    Veefkind J, Aben I, McMullan K et al. TROPOMI on the ESA Sentinel-5 Precursor: a GMES mission for global observations of the atmospheric composition for climate, air quality and ozone layer applications. Remote Sens Environ2012; 120: 70–83.

    Not in our library

  53. 53.

    Huang X, Ding AJ, Wang ZL et al. Amplified transboundary transport of haze by aerosol-boundary layer interaction in China. Nat Geosci2020; 13: 428–34.

    Not in our library

  54. 54.

    Huang X, Wang ZL, Ding AJ. Impact of aerosol-PBL interaction on haze pollution: multiyear observational evidences in north China. Geophys Res Lett2018; 45: 8596–603.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 4

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.