Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 24, 2026.

Human Ageing Genomic Resources: updates on key databases in ageing research

João Pedro de Magalhães, Zoya Abidi, Gabriel Arantes dos Santos and 12 more

Nucleic Acids Research · 2023 · CC BY

doi:10.1093/nar/gkad927

Abstract

Ageing is a complex and multifactorial process. For two decades, the Human Ageing Genomic Resources (HAGR) have aided researchers in the study of various aspects of ageing and its manipulation. Here, we present the key features and recent enhancements of these resources, focusing on its six main databases. One database, GenAge, focuses on genes related to ageing, featuring 307 genes linked to human ageing and 2205 genes associated with longevity and ageing in model organisms. AnAge focuses on ageing, longevity, and life-history across animal species, containing data on 4645 species. DrugAge includes information about 1097 longevity drugs and compounds in model organisms such as mice, rats, flies, worms and yeast. GenDR provides a list of 214 genes associated with the life-extending benefits of dietary restriction in model organisms. CellAge contains a catalogue of 866 genes associated with cellular senescence. The LongevityMap serves as a repository for genetic variants associated with human longevity, encompassing 3144 variants pertaining to 884 genes. Additionally, HAGR provides various tools as well as gene expression signatures of ageing, dietary restriction, and replicative senescence based on meta-analyses. Our databases are integrated, regularly updated, and manually curated by experts. HAGR is freely available online (https://genomics.senescence.info/).

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 24, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Ageing is one of the most complex biological processes whose underlying mechanisms, despite extensive studies, remain to be elucidated. Furthermore, because ageing is a major risk factor for mortality and several diseases, researchers from various fields are studying this process. The Human Ageing Genomic Resources (HAGR) is an intuitive and powerful collection of online tools and databases that have greatly assisted scientists in addressing this complex problem.

HAGR first became publicly available online in 2004 and has been growing dynamically since, in parallel with the major growth and development of ageing-related research. Our resources include six main databases related to different aspects of ageing research (Figure 1), alongside other supplementary projects and general information on ageing biology. Given the impact of genetics on ageing, HAGR places a strong emphasis on genetics and genomics.

In this paper, we provide an overview of the current version of HAGR, summarizing each of its databases and tools, and highlighting updates made since its previous release. Our goal is to provide an up-to-date guide to one of the leading and most frequently accessed online platforms used in biogerontology. HAGR is freely available at https://genomics.senescence.info/, with no registration required.

GenAge: The database of ageing-related genes

GenAge (https://genomics.senescence.info/genes/) is our benchmark database focused on genes associated with the ageing process, the so-called ‘gerontome’. It is in turn divided into two core databases: (i) GenAge—Human; and (ii) GenAge—Model Organisms. Both databases have been manually curated from the scientific literature. Detailed information about GenAge is available in earlier publications, what follows is a brief description.

GenAge—Human—is a curated list of 307 genes associated with human ageing, or at least genes that may significantly impact the human ageing phenotype and processes. It is important to note that our focus within HAGR is on biological ageing, not just age-related diseases. Because lifespan is influenced by multiple factors beyond ageing, such as accidents and non-age-related pathologies, we focus on genes that potentially regulate the ageing process as a whole—or that at least influence various aspects of the ageing phenotype—rather than solely those affecting lifespan (refer to the LongevityMap below for longevity-related genes). Each human gene entry was thus selected following a careful review of the literature with genes associated with human progeroid syndromes, such as Werner syndrome, and human homologs of genes modulating ageing in mammalian models—typically mice—as a starting point. Considering that genes can be associated with ageing based on different types of studies and evidence, further relevant studies for gene selection include human genetic association studies for longevity, genetic manipulations in lower model organisms, and in vitro studies. Consequently, genes are classified into nine categories corresponding to their level of ageing-associated evidence (ranging from ‘indirect/inconclusive evidence linking the gene product to ageing’ to ‘evidence directly linking the gene product to ageing in humans’), as previously detailed.

Genes commonly differentially expressed during mammalian ageing are also available to researchers in GenAge. A recent meta-analysis by our lab revealed global and tissue-specific gene expression changes during human ageing, with significant overlaps with both GenAge Human and with the LongevityMap. More specifically, we identified 449 upregulated and 162 downregulated genes with age across all tissues. This is a substantially larger mammalian ageing signature than previously, which in 2009 consisted of 56 upregulated and 17 downregulated genes, possibly due to the larger number of studies now available.

GenAge—Model Organisms—comprises 2205 genes associated with longevity or ageing in model organisms based on genetic manipulation experiments curated from the literature. Only genes that, when genetically manipulated, have a significant impact on ageing and/or longevity are included. As our focus is on the ageing process, genes reducing lifespan by causing specific diseases without evidence of premature or accelerated ageing phenotypes are typically excluded. Genes are then classified into two broad categories: ‘pro-longevity’ (n = 545) and ‘anti-longevity’ (n = 1101). In addition, yeast genes that reduce lifespan in large-scale screens or without a significant link to ageing processes are more ambiguously classified as ‘necessary for fitness’ (n = 497). In addition, genes with conflicting results are classified as ‘unclear’ (n = 27) and, lastly, genes with insufficient data are categorized as ‘unannotated’ (n = 35), as previously described. Information from model organisms is also leveraged to infer possible genes associated with human ageing in the aforementioned human dataset. The species distribution in GenAge is presented in Table 1 and includes the major traditional biomedical models such as mice, flies, worms, and yeast.

While the number of human ageing-related genes has only modestly changed over the years, existing entries are further curated, resulting in the addition of dozens of new bibliographic references. Observations concerning many genes are also regularly updated to reflect new findings. Regarding model organisms, in addition to including almost 100 new genes since the last update, we also added five additional species, most notably S. pombe, an essential unicellular organism in ageing research—now featuring 61 entries.

AnAge: the database of animal ageing and longevity

AnAge (https://genomics.senescence.info/species/) is a curated database of ageing, longevity, and life-history traits. Its primary aim is to support studies involving comparative ageing biology while also being of value to fields such as evolutionary biology, ecology and conservation.

For a comprehensive description of AnAge, please refer to an earlier publication. In brief, this database presents entries with a multitude of data, including data on maximum lifespan, metabolism, taxonomy, and additional life-history data, alongside relevant ageing phenotypes and observations. AnAge incorporates over 1400 articles and also highlights a list of nine species exhibiting negligible senescence.

Although primarily focused on animal biology, AnAge also includes entries about plants (n = 5) and fungi (n = 4). Regarding animals, nine phyla are represented, with approximately 98% of the entries in Chordata, divided into 14 classes. The most well-represented classes are Aves, Mammalia, Teleostei and Reptilia, respectively (Table 2). AnAge is of great value for ageing research as it offers information on the wide range of lifespans across taxa (Figure 2), facilitating a variety of comparative studies in biogerontology.

AnAge is one of the oldest and most frequently used HAGR resources and is arguably the benchmark animal longevity database worldwide due to its constant updating and manual curation. The current version comprises 4671 entries, encompassing 4645 species and 26 taxa.

DrugAge: the database of anti-ageing drugs

Among HAGR’s recent additions, DrugAge (https://genomics.senescence.info/drugs/), consists of a manually curated compilation of drugs and compounds that extend longevity in model organisms. Some compounds are listed multiple times because they have been tested across various species and doses, enabling more comprehensive assessments of their impact on longevity, as shown previously using DrugAge data. Given our focus on ageing, compounds from studies involving disease-prone animals or harmful conditions are not included.

Presently, DrugAge features 1097 drugs or compounds evaluated in over 3200 experiments across 37 species, supported by a total of 656 references. Figure 3 illustrates the growth trajectory of HAGR databases over the years, where we can see a major improvement over the previous versions that is more marked for DrugAge. Indeed, longevity pharmacology has been exploding, and the growth in longevity drugs has outpaced the growth of longevity genes.

The recent surge of interest in anti-ageing drugs within health research and the pharmaceutical/biotechnology sectors underscores the significance of a scientifically reliable resource like DrugAge. Despite its relatively recent development, our DrugAge database has established itself as a leading information source in geroscience and is, after GenAge and AnAge, the most widely accessed database within HAGR (Figure 4A).

GenDR: the database of dietary restriction genes

Dietary restriction (DR) is a widely studied anti-ageing intervention, yet its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Recognizing the genetic component of ageing, our GenDR database (https://genomics.senescence.info/diet/) compiles genes associated with DR to aid research and advance our understanding of the genetic and molecular mechanisms of DR-induced life-extension.

Further details about GenDR are available in a previous publication, but briefly this database includes two datasets: (i) genes inferred from genetic manipulation experiments in model organisms that regulate the life-extending benefits of DR; and (ii) mammalian genes whose expression is robustly altered due to DR derived from a meta-analysis. In total, GenDR comprises 5 model organisms and entails 214 genes inferred from genetic manipulations, alongside 172 genes derived from gene expression changes. To our knowledge, it remains the only database of genetic alterations associated with DR.

CellAge: the database of cell senescence genes

Cellular senescence is triggered by various stressors like telomere attrition during replication, the dysregulation of onco- and tumour-suppressor genes, and cellular or DNA damage from sources such as hydrogen peroxide and irradiation. Senescent cells undergo proliferative arrest and secrete a mix of proinflammatory factors known as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). As senescent cells continually produce proinflammatory factors they may contribute to inflammageing and hinder tissue repair and renewal. Cellular senescence has been linked to various ageing-related diseases including cancer, Alzheimer's disease, osteoarthritis and diabetes.

CellAge was compiled from a systematic search of the literature, and genes were included based on specific criteria, as described. Briefly, the CellAge database consists of genes inferred from genetic manipulations in vitro that induce (n = 370, 42.7%) or inhibit (n = 475, 54.8%) replicative (n = 153), stress-induced (n = 185), and oncogene-induced (n = 238) cellular senescence (https://genomics.senescence.info/cells/). Some genes are involved in multiple classes of senescence. There are 21 genes that have an unclear effect on cellular senescence, inducing or inhibiting this process depending on experimental context. Additionally, there are 360 genes in CellAge where the mechanism by which they influence the senescence program is unclear.

The current version of the CellAge database contains 866 genes, a considerable increase from the 279 genes in the first build. Furthermore, we previously used ‘replicative senescence’ as the default annotation for CellAge genes when the literature did not specify how the gene was influencing the senescence phenotype. We have now added a fourth annotation, ‘unclear,’ alongside the ‘replicative,’ ‘stress-induced,’ and ‘oncogene-induced’ tags, in order to better represent our knowledge of how these genes contribute to cellular senescence. Previous entries have been updated to reflect this new annotation where applicable.

Furthermore, CellAge includes a list of 1259 genes differentially expressed during replicative senescence (525 and 734 over- and underexpressed, respectively) derived from a meta-analysis of senescent cells compared to proliferating counterparts.

LongevityMap: The database of genetic association studies of longevity

While human longevity derives from a complex interplay of factors, the heritability of human longevity has been estimated to be ∼25%. The LongevityMap (https://genomics.senescence.info/longevity/) was developed to assist in cataloguing the increasing volume of data arising from genetic-variant studies of human longevity.

Succinctly, all entries within the LongevityMap were curated from the literature, excluding studies in cohorts of unhealthy individuals at baseline. Details on study design are provided for each entry, including population details, sample sizes, and indications of statistical significance, alongside negative results. In total, our database encompasses over 500 entries, comprising 884 genes and 3144 variants. The list is derived from 270 individual studies and presents 275 statistically significant results.

Additional datasets, tools, and features

In addition to our core databases, HAGR also integrates other relevant resources on ageing. Of note, the Digital Ageing Atlas (https://ageing-map.org/) serves as a platform for age-related changes that includes age-related molecular, physiological, psychological, and pathological data to deliver an interactive database that centralizes human ageing-related changes. Despite its status as an external database to HAGR, we link to this portal to provide additional ageing-related context to genes in HAGR. Likewise, our genomics resources include genome and transcriptome sequencing of the naked-mole rat (the longest-lived rodent) and the bowhead whale (the longest-lived mammal). Moreover, HAGR encompasses projects on the relationship between ageing, cancer, and evolution. Beyond genes related to age-related diseases and transcriptional signatures of ageing, these projects host datasets that can be explored and downloaded. In addition, two bioinformatics tools for ageing research are featured in HAGR: Ageing Research Computational Tools (ARCT), a Perl toolkit and an SPSS script to determine the demographic rate of aging for a given population, as described previously.

Furthermore, HAGR provides information and news about ageing biology. Our website includes links to social media (Twitter: https://twitter.com/AgingBiology and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BiologyAgingNews) with the latest news in the biology and genetics of ageing and includes an educational resource on ageing (https://www.senescence.info/). Lastly, we maintain WhosAge (https://whoswho.senescence.info/), a compilation featuring 340 individuals and 65 companies contributing to biogerontology.

Usage examples in ageing and longevity

With over 1000 citations (Figure 4B), HAGR has been invaluable to multiple studies in various and diverse research topics in the biology of ageing (Figure 4C). Of note in recent years, AnAge was used in a study to identify species with remarkable longevity with evolutionary implications for lifespan. AnAge has also facilitated data gathering on species’ maximum lifespan and relative age comparisons, body size values in a study exploring evolutionary pathways to SARS-CoV-2 resistance, and age at female sexual maturity in a major research endeavour on somatic mutation rates across mammals. HAGR’s data contributed to accurate predictions of basal metabolic rate and organ weights.

To highlight other recent examples of the use of HAGR, Townes et al. used GenAge in their work to identify new potential genes associated with longevity in C. elegans and S. cerevisiae. Moreover, GenAge and DrugAge facilitated the annotation and curation of ageing-related genes/proteins which led to the identification of potential drug targets. In collaboration with other scientists, our research group has used GenDR to aid in the application of machine learning methods to identify DR-associated features. A recent study used DrugAge as the primary source of information to identify lifespan-extending compounds in diverse model organisms, providing novel insights on lifespan extension. A co-regulated network of senescence genes in human tissues was created using CellAge's features. The CellAge database was also utilized in a study on microglial senescence, where human senescence signatures and senescence-associated genes were retrieved, and in another research endeavour where it assisted in identifying genes differentially expressed in aged stem cells. Further, the association of host genes with ageing across various eukaryotic hosts was investigated using the CellAge and GenAge databases. Podder et al. used, among other databases, the Digital Ageing Atlas to discover longevity genes associated with nutrient sensing. A new variant in HLA-DQB1 gene was associated with longevity and lipid homeostasis in a Chinese population study that employed the LongevityMap in variant selection. Finally, Cardoso et al. used several HAGR databases to generate biomarker panels for human frailty. These instances underscore the diverse ways in which HAGR databases can support ageing research.

Discussion

Ageing is a complex process that arises from the interplay of various molecular pathways and the environment; therefore, the catalogue and study of its multiple components is pivotal for understanding ageing and developing interventions. HAGR was conceived to facilitate such comprehensive analyses by offering comprehensive, consistent, and accurate data. Since its start, HAGR has been publicly available online for everyone to use, with all HAGR databases available for download.

Compared to previous versions of HAGR, our resources have seen significant updates and growth (Figure 3). Furthermore, as illustrated in Figure 4B, since its inception in 2004, HAGR has consistently expanded in terms of users and citations, emphasizing its importance within the scientific community. Among our primary resources, AnAge and GenAge continue to attract the most visitors, with the more recent DrugAge also now a popular resource (Figure 4A). As we look to the future of HAGR, we will leverage insights from database usage as well as user feedback to guide future developments and prioritize our curation efforts. We will also continue to align HAGR with developments in the ageing field and with new technologies, such as advances in single-cell sequencing as well as recent discoveries regarding the role of epigenetics in ageing.

In addition to HAGR, other websites and databases also provide valuable resources for studying ageing. One noteworthy example is the Ageing Atlas, an online resource that employs diverse data to explore the ageing process in a multidimensional way. Another database, AgeFactDB, compiles ageing-related factors, incorporating our databases in its analyses. Nonetheless, HAGR stands out as a leading resource in biogerontology due to its integrated features, offering comprehensive tools, datasets, and insights into ageing and longevity. We anticipate that HAGR, together with other tools, will continue to advance the study of ageing biology and contribute to our overarching goal: developing a paradigm that explains ageing and improves human health and longevity.

References 60

  1. 1.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.
  6. 6.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.
  9. 9.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  13. 13.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  14. 14.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  25. 25.
  26. 26.
  27. 27.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  28. 28.
  29. 29.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  30. 30.
  31. 31.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  32. 32.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  33. 33.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  35. 35.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  36. 36.
  37. 37.
  38. 38.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

  39. 39.
  40. 40.
All 60 references

Cited by papers we hold 1

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.